One-to-one rules NAT?

Similar Questions

• Two different sources of data in a SQL data in the file one rule

  Hello

  Just curious if we can refer to two different data sources in a unique piece of data SQL in a rules file to load the data into the SQL Interface.

  Thank you
  Ted.

  TIm

  While you were incorrect, you weren't wrong. You ca. Use has either an odbc connection that is hard-coded or a substitution variable to define the name of connection oCBC (with the exception of the connections of the OIC). You can not connect to two different odbc both connections. Your idea of a related db or a synonym is a good if their environment allows

• Rule NAT VPN problem

  Hello people, I had a lot of trouble trying to solve this problem, but hoping someone here can enlighten me.

  I have a remote site that hosts a number of services that we manage remotely with an IPSec VPN connection. When connecting to the site connect us very well and can make most of the actions like RDP and connect to servers for maintenance, but a service fails to connect unless I have add a NAT rule exempt to the configuration of the router (ASA 5505).

  Once this rule in place service work, but other services that initially worked work stoppage. In short, this rule must be in place while doing a single task, but then contracted for other tasks. I hope that there is some sort of rule or behavior, I can add to the ASDM configuration makes it so I don't have to manually add this rule whenever I connect.

  Here are the details of the rule:

  access-list 1 permit line outside_nat0_outbound extended ip 192.168.15.192 255.255.255.192 192.168.15.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (outside) 0 outside_nat0_outbound list access outside tcp udp 0 0 0

  When the connection is established without the rule in place the ASDM syslog shows these warnings:

  Deny tcp src inside: outside:10.100.32.203/135 dst61745 by access-group "inside_access_in" [0x0, 0x0]

  The strange thing is 10.100.32.203 is IP internal my host computer. This is not yet the external IP address of the network I connect from.

  Is it possible a problem with the VPN pool using a subset of the subnet of the VIRTUAL LAN inside? Inside VLAN is 192.168.15.0/24 and the VPN is 192.168.15.200 - 250. I am ready to reconfigure the VPN address pool but need to do remotely, and am unaware of how to do this reconfiguration safely without losing my remote access, since physical access to the router itself is currently very difficult.

  If more details are needed, I am happy to give them.

  Hi GrahamB,

  Yes, the problem with too much running in subnet.

  There are a lot of private-address available, so please create a new group policy and tunnel-group and fill

  pool separate to value ip address and remote with it, when the new cluster to solve your problem, can safely remove the old one.

  I hope this helps.

  Thank you

  Rizwan Muhammed.

• RV082 v4.0.0.07 individuals and access rules NAT problem

  Hello

  I just bought two RV082 to run a 20 computer and office web server 4. I use special NAT to public IPs are mapped on different servers and our monitoring system and it seems to work very well. For each address of individuals using a NAT, I created the following access rules:

  Allow HTTP WAN1 everything [PA]

  Allow SSH WAN1 everything [PA]

  Refuse all WAN1 everything [PA]

  Allow rules are of a higher priority so my experience with other firewalls suggests that they should be applied first blocks access to all ports and ports HTTP and SSH then would be open. What seems to be the case is very disconcerting, with any rules applied Allow refusal rules are removed completely open all ports. If I move the priority of rule Deny it blocks all ports, as expected.

  My question is how can I prevent access to all ports except ports HTTP and SSH with the router in NAT mode specific.

  When an access rule is set on a NAT 1 rule at 1, you want to change the public ip address to the private IP which is mapped to the public ip address.

  Allow to use HTTP WAN1 everything [private address]

  Allow SSH WAN1 everything [private address]

  Refuse all WAN1 everything [private address]

• VCloud 5.1 API c# edge Gateway service detailed configuration examples of code including firewall rules, rules Nat and DHCP.

  Hello world

  Everyone can share codes sample detailed to set firewall rules and NAT for c# rules?  I looked in the examples provided with the API, but I need more samples.

  Here is the example of function to configure the firewall to VCloud API 5.1 for c# rule.

  ///

  To create an object of type of firewall rule. This object is used to configure the firewall.

  ///

  Name of the rule

  Source IP address range

  Firewall Type protocols

  Type of firewall policy

  Source port

  Destiniation Ip address range.

  Destination

  Toggle rule

  Turn logging on or off.

  Firewall rule

  public static FirewallRuleType CreateFirewallRule (string name, string sourceIpRange, FirewallRuleTypeProtocols protocols, FirewallPolicyType action, sourcePort int, string destinationIpRange, int destinationPort, bool isEnabled, bool enableLogging)

  {

  Create an object of type firewall rule.

  FirewallRuleType firewallRuleType = new FirewallRuleType();

  Configure the setting was active user interface check box.

  firewallRuleType.IsEnabled = isEnabled;

  firewallRuleType.IsEnabledSpecified = true;

  Set the description of the rule from the user interface name text box.

  firewallRuleType.Description = name;

  Normally, this is a port number.

  firewallRuleType.SourcePortRange = sourcePort.ToString ();

  firewallRuleType.SourcePortSpecified = true;

  Configure the Protocol

  Protocol of var = new FirewallRuleTypeProtocols();

  Value of the Protocol Set object

  Protocol. Items = new Object() {true};

  Define the name of element

  Protocol. ItemsElementName = new ItemsChoiceType [] {ItemsChoiceType.Tcp};

  Protocol Set

  firewallRuleType.Protocols = Protocol;

  Set the destination IP address range

  firewallRuleType.Item = destinationIpRange;

  Normally this is the port number.

  firewallRuleType.DestinationPortRange = destinationPort.ToString ();

  Set Source Ip range

  firewallRuleType.Item1 = sourceIpRange;

  Configure logging check box UI activate recording.

  firewallRuleType.EnableLogging = enableLogging;

  firewallRuleType.EnableLoggingSpecified = true;

  Configuration by default allow/deny action.

  firewallRuleType.Policy = action. Value();

  Return firewallRuleType;

  }

• Static IP behind RV220W

  I'll start by saying even though I have some experience of COMPUTING, networking is not my most fort.

  Picked up a pair of RV220W for a project I'm working on.  I have several available IP, of which 4 are assigned in use by a server behind the RV220W.  All 4 of these IP addresses are static external IP.  I'm trying to figure out how I can configure the RV220W so that the requests for these 4 IP get routed to the server.

  Before buying it, I was under the impression that I was trying to do was called one-to-one NAT, but after reading the 'Help' document on the individual page of NAT, I don't think that is fair.  I point out below:

  Cisco RV220W network Wireless N security firewall help

  Firewall
  One-to-one NAT
  One-to-one NAT is a way to make the systems behind a firewall and configured with the private IP addresses seem to have public IP addresses.
  One - to One-rule of NAT table
  The following table contains the list of the available special NAT rules configured by the user.
  Begin private Range: start ip address in the private IP (LAN)
  Public range start: start the IP the public IP (WAN IP).
  Public IP subnet mask: the subnet mask of the public IP address
  The range length: length of the range maps one at a private address in the public address to the given range.
  Service: this column indicates the service to be accepted by the host LAN.
  The actions that can be taken on One - to One-rules NAT are:
  (Checkbox in the first column heading): selects all the entries in the table.
  Add: opens the Configuration specific NAT page, to add a new entry.
  Edit: opens the Configuration specific NAT page, to edit the selected entry.
  Remove: removes the selected entries.

  So according to their literature, the server must be configured with a private IP address.  Unfortunately, one of the applications that I use is allowed per IP address, and I know that I can't use the software with private/not routable IPS.

  The RV220W is capable of not only ensure the line (firewall, rules of access, content filtering, port trigering & transfer etc.) but also to do what I was hoping to do (keep the external IP address on the server and routing appropriate)?

  Thanks a lot for your advice & expertise!

  Julius Perkins wrote:
  Picked up a pair of RV220W's for a project I'm working on.  I have several IP's available, 4 of which are assigned to/in use by a server behind the RV220W.  All 4 of these IP's are static external IPs.  I'm trying to figure out how I can configure the RV220W so that requests to those 4 IP's get routed to the server.
  

  Because your servers must be configured with static public IP addresses, RV220W may not work for you.

  RV042G supports the DMZ port, which allows the servers to be connected via a switch (labeled with "DMZ/WAN") 2nd WAN port.

• Adding more of one type of topology in the rules

  Hello world

  Is it possible to add more than one type of topology and get properties combined on a single rule?

  If so, please help me as soon as possible.

  -Shiva

  I don't think it's a problem of multiple TopologyObjects in one rule. The way THIS particular gem is realized is using abstraction.

  The highest level, this can be done by doing something as affecting the scope:

  "TopologyObject where topologyTypeName = 'HostCPUs' or topologyTypeName = 'LogicalDisk' or......"

  (add as much as you had like... but be warned: you'll have to do your own intelligence here to ensure that you do not use invalid property queries, because each of these extended types have different properties.)

  HOWEVER -

  I think that the real solution to your problem, it's that you must set your scope to something that you can use to associate all together. In this case, why not just set your scope to the FSMService itself, then use logic to find the children of type 'Host' and go from there? Even more, you can define your scope on the ' home' object and try to find the host for an object of type 'FSMService' parents - which gives you your HostCPUs information, (since HostCPUs is owned by 'cpu' of the ' host' object), as well as information on the application of the FSMService.

• RV180 rules of access and NAT

  OK, I have a RV180 that I'm going to have some problems with access rules and one to one NAT.

  What I have is very basic with regard to needs. Outgoing Internet flows very well.

  I have an FTP server that does not use the WAN interface for the public IP address, so I created a One to One private NAT range Begin 192.168.8.28 for the inside address. I then enter the public IP 1.1.1.1 set the length of the range to 1 and the FTP service (also tried everything) and then saved.

  In my access rules I created and rule of incoming traffic always allow ANY for FTP

  192.168.8.28 is sent to the Server Local (DNAT IP)

  Use another WAN IP address is active and set to 1.1.1.1 and the rule is enabled

  No joy in the FTP connection and I don't see anything in the papers, showing the blocked port. What I'm missing here?

  After you configure a rule one by one, the outbound traffic is allowed by default and incoming traffic is allowed by the services defined in the one-to-one NAT rule.

• 8.3 (1) ASA Cisco VPN Client and IP Communicator - one-way communication

  Community salvation.

  I have a strange problem with my setup and I'm sure it's either some type of routing (or NAT) or just missing one rule allows traffic. But I'm now at a point where I would like to ask your help.

  I have a few users remote access that have the Cisco IP Communicator (CICC) application installed on their laptops. So:

  The VPN with CPIC user <> ASA Firewall <> router voice <> MAC <> IP phone

  The VPN works fine for all other traffic. The connection of basis for the IP Communicator works well. He get is connected to the CallManager, is shown as registered and you can even call an internal phone and also external phones. BUT: while you can hear the called party (if the phone internal) it does not work for the other direction. There is no sound from the remote/appellant.

  I already understood that it is also not possible to ping from the phone VPN to the internal subnet IP phone. While the VPN user can ping any other device in the network internal, he cannot do for Cisco IP phones. But if the VPN phone calls a phone no-internal (mobile...) - it works!

  My thought is that the call cannot be build up properly between the VPN phone and the internal phone.

  I found similar situations with google, but they are all for the reverse: call for internal works, but not for VPN.

  What do you think?

  Hello

  Usually ASA lists specific to the customer networks VPN Split Tunnel runs.

  This would mean that there is a Split Tunnel ACL used in configurations of the SAA for this VPN connection that needs to have the missing network added to the VPN connection traffic.

  -Jouni

• ASA 8.3 - SSL VPN - NAT problem

  Need help to find how to configure anyconnect VPN with VPN client using a NAT networking internal.

  There are many items on the side - how to disable NAT for vpn pool.

  I need to create the gateway VPN to the complex international lnetwork, vpnpool is out of range of regular subnet of that network, so it's going to be questions witout NAT routing.

  I so need to vpn clients connected to be PATed to . The problem is that there is also a dynamic to PAT rule for the ordinary acccess Iternet which translates as 'rules NAT asymmetry... "error.

  Create two times different NAT rules and moving them on up/down makes no difference. There are also some hidden rules of vpn setup :-(that could not be seen.

  V8.3 seems is destroying trust in Cisco firewall...

  Thank you.

  Stan,

  Something like this works for me.

  192.168.0.0/24---routeur--172.16.0.0/24 ASA-= cloud = host. (the tunnel he get IP address of 'over' pool, which is also connected to the inside)

  BSNs-ASA5520-10 (config) # clear xlate
  INFO: 762 xlates deleted
  BSNs-ASA5520-10 (config) # sh run nat
  NAT (inside, outside) static all of a destination SHARED SHARED static
  !
  NAT source auto after (indoor, outdoor) dynamic one interface
  BSNs-ASA5520-10 (config) # sh run object network
  network of the LOCAL_NETWORK object
  192.168.0.0 subnet 255.255.255.0
  The SHARED object network
  172.16.0.0 subnet 255.255.255.0
  BSNs-ASA5520-10 (config) # sh run ip local pool
  IP local pool ALL 10.0.0.100 - 10.0.0.200
  local IP ON 172.16.0.100 pool - 172.16.0.155
  BSNs-ASA5520-10 (config) # sh run tunne
  BSNs-ASA5520-10 (config) # sh run tunnel-group
  attributes global-tunnel-group DefaultWEBVPNGroup
  address pool ON

  If I get your drift... bypass inside and outside is not really necessary on Cisco equipment as it should work straight out of the box via the proxy arp, but I'm not face or solution providers for remote access.

  Marcin

• 2 static NAT on the same Interface

  I have an ASA 5510 (8.2 (5)) and I'm trying to set up a VPN site-to site of one of our suppliers.  The problem I am running into is that they want me NAT one specific to one of our servers private IP, and this server already has a static NAT from the outside of a demilitarized zone.  It's the current rule NAT:

  static (DMZ1, external) 65.43.x.x 10.0.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.255

  and they want card me 172.28.9.42 on the same server, so I tried to add:

  (DMZ1, external) 172.28.9.42 static 10.0.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.255

  but can not because it's a double translation.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Hello

  It seems to me you must configure a static NAT to politics

  Configurations would be as follows

  DMZ-POLICY-NAT of ip 10.0.0.3 host allowed access list

  (DMZ1, external) 172.28.9.42 static access-list DMZ-POLICY-NAT

  Regarding configurations

  • Name of the ACL can be naturally you want
  • Destination network can be a single host if necessary IP address
  • You should be able to configure multiple lines if necessary

  Note that you need to have this NAT configuration before the real public IP address command static NAT. You need to remove the existing static NAT to configure the above and add the original.

  This is because if you do not configure static NAT of politics first in the configuration, all traffic will keep hitting the normal rule of the static NAT for the public IP address.

  -Jouni

• Open with a Xbox NAT problems.

  When I got my 1900ac I used Media Priortization to get NAT open for Call of Duty Advanced Warfare on my Xbox One. prioritize the Xbox. It worked fine for about 6 months until what I changed my operator of cable/net of Nextech in Ks. This company uses the 1900ac to connect its system to all it's customers (since I already had one they use mine). Unfortunately, I am unable to get an open NAT in this game I tried almost everything, NAT forwarding, triggering, prioritization of the media. Support of NexTech & Xbox Live support, useless. I tried Portforward. com, nothing. Redirect port 53 breaks the connection to the network & making the static ip address change for Xbox has not helped. Almost everything I looked at seem obsolete & I am at my wits end. It would seem by now Linksys should have available solutions, any ideas?

  Chin_pamz13 thank you very much for your answer. I tried to check if my modem had a public or private ip address, but I don't know how to do this; I read on double NAT elsewhere. Nevertheless, I think I finally found a solution that seems to work so far. I went to the website "tech - recipes.» com "& found an article, 'Xbox one open NAT' by Aaron St. Clair.» I tried his first suggestion regarding the port of release, with additional ports I had'nt seen before. Who has not worked for me so I followed his instructions to the Xbox in the demilitarized zone & it works! I think that my problems from before were the result of bad to configure the static ip address for my router & Xbox. The previous instructions had me change the ip in the console with the router. Aaron said does not do in the Xbox, leave the router to do the work, it's supposed to do & make sure the console settings are on automatic. In the router in the DMZ, I was'nt sure how to proceed, but at the bottom is a section called list of reservations DHCP; clicked on this, XboxOne saw, clicked on that & he filled the top for me MAC address. Then I went to network settings Xbox, advanced & clicked settings on "automatic" to the ip address, subnet and DNS. I checked the connections mutiplayer, toured "hold bumper & trigger buttons" & finally got a NAT open; pulled up to cod Advanced Warfare & also got open NAT it. I could have screwed up when I did the port triggering, but given the difficulty of the DMZ seems to work I'll let things alone. Hope this helps anyone else having problems NAT open.

• How to set access restrictions "collision" in wrt610n - what are the preferences of rule?

  Hello. I want to implement access restrictions to a MAC address (machine of my child) based on the days of the week. Su in Th allow less access time throughout the fifth - his afternoon access should arrive later. The question is how do I program in the router. I know I can set the rules with the keyword 'allow' and 'disable', but I do know not preference storage.

  When I put (Su-Th-6-21) allowed the time to access and router automatically denies internet access machine set outside this interval of time then. The problem is in the power of the time who refuses so calculated. I want to give more time access at the weekend, so I was hoping if I can simply add rule ' fifth - his 6-22:30 allowed access time. I hoped that router will consider time explicitly defined in time inexplicitly set but it seems that this is not so.

  Does anyone know the rules rule? What are their preferences/priorieties, iis, it is possible to stack more rules affecting a MAC address or it is so simple that the first rule "rulez"? Is it possible to put more than one rule of time touching a machine?

  GV, thanks for your explanation. I would discuss only if access to equal access to the router itself and what is more, the reset action would be easily detected and can be protected physically. It is a pity however, during the router power can intestinal strategies. I like being green and I would like to physically cut access to my home network by disabling the router (even if I tried to maximize the software protection). Thanks again for your confirmation, we must only remember that it is better to use 'disable' the rule that 'allow' if the router can suffer power breaks.

• Lower to upper - must I NAT?

  Hi all

  My PIX book States for traffic to pass a lower to a higher level of security level of security (e.g. out I / f-> in i / f) then two conditions must be met:

  (i) a static translation must exist for the destination.

  (II) an appropriate ACL/Conduit must be in place.

  Point ii) is fine, but what if I have no requirement for NAT?

  What I do NAT?

  I have implemented a config "no nat?

  Can I just ignore NAT altogether?

  Thanks in advance.

  If you run PIX 7.0, then the 'no nat-control' disables the need for NAT (which should now be the default).

  If you are running an earlier version, you need to configure NAT/static statements:

  There are two options, one using nat 0/static the other just with nat 0 and the sheep setting...

  Visit this link for more information:

  How to configure the PIX firewall to pass traffic without NAT

  http://www.ciscotaccc.com/security/showcase?case=K72878196

• As a general rule for video compression without loss of quality?

  I noticed on iTunes for example I can download a full movie of 1080 p that looks great, and it won't be like 3 or 4 GB, sometimes less. But I've got 15 minutes videos that are much more than that.

  I want to compress a video and then store it in my videos on my computer folder. But they are still huge and I'm still too afraid to go too low because I have no idea how saying how much it will affect quality.

  Is there a general rule? Perhaps a way to divide the size of the original file? If the initial project is say 40 GB, which is not a lot compared to Hollywood movies, I'm sure that there are thousands of GB. How to make it down to 3 or 4 GB and it look fine?

  I'm talking about the videos that I'm done, I'm not going to change again once, etc. I know how to export just in case I need to go back.

  There is only one "rule" when it comes to compression without quality loss - files will be huge.

  Now, if we change this scenario a bit to say "without significant quality loss", the situation becomes more complex.  Different people notice different things, and there are a LOT of variables that go into the encoding.  There is no simple guide for this.  My advice would be either learn about compression, or simply you don't have to worry about the size so.

  Hard drives are cheap.  Download more when you need it.