Similar Questions

• Fervent support artist/Euphonix MC Color

  I know this will be requested before, but in the new spirit of openness and collaboration, are there plans to support the avid group yet?

  Otherwise, the wave is the only Panel CC supported, I have, but I much prefer the MC Panel because it has the smallest form factor and more standardized rings for luminance.

  What exactly is the reason for NOT supporting their?

  Looks like you're locking many users supporting them not.

  I'm really an artist sequelae and usually use the wave with the finesse of the color.

  with speedgrade oart of the suite is amazing, but I really want to switch the signs?

  Plans at all to support them or EuCon just isn't possible.

  I have a CP-200, but they seem to be really difficult to get working and limited, and still too big. I like the smaller color...

  Tristan

  Please file a feature on that request... a bit of a warning, this captcha is one of the trickier to 'pass '. There are a lot of people would like additional surfaces supported.

  /Feature bug report form requires Adobe...

  https://www.Adobe.com/cfusion/mmForm/index.cfm?name=wishform

  Neil

• Make a translation specific LR of monitor in the laboratory?

  I am new to Lightroom and did not dare in PS again. I just upgraded from a Mac Book Pro, iMac. I have a calibrator screen Spyder Pro5 and I used it to calibrate my monitor. Thinking that I was ready, repaired a few photos of the beautiful landscape (shot on Nikon D810 in RAW) and exported and then uploaded to the Photo of the Bay. Impressions approached back on color by far on the density. After a few emails back and comes with the support of the Photo of the Bay, I had the note below. Clearly, I don't want to give up my iMac nine, so there the advice of others to help me?

  Bay Photo e-mail:

  We do not recommend using Apple-brand monitors for calibration printing. They are designed to make the images on-screen pleasant to the eye: contrast, saturation high and bright. The result is the user in compensation because of these attributes - the images on the screen will appear always brighter and more vibrant color correction-no prints will be.

  Here are some recommended monitors:

  Recommendations:

  EIZO ColorEdge series, starting at ~ $1000
  NEC - P, PA - or SpectraView series, starting at ~ $600
  Series ASUS PA, from ~ $400
  Dell UltraSharp PremierColor series, starting at ~ $500

  In general, a good monitor, designed for a rendering of the colors accurate, must have the following characteristics:

  Resolution: 1920 x 1080px or better (16:9 or 16:10 aspect ratio)
  Contrast ratio: 1000: 1 or better
  Color support: 1.07 billion colors or more
  Viewing angle: 178 ° or better

  The little Apple monitors is pure BS! Your problem is your laboratory whose color is not very successful (bet that they require to send you documents to sRGB; awful).

  You want to match a print view, here is a video to walk if she. Yes, Eizo and SpectraView are a reference display system much better that what Apple offers, but you must all properly calibrate them for a match. Also consider using a picture of color like this reference: http://www.digitaldog.net/files/2014PrinterTestFileFlat.tif.zip and http://www.digitaldog.net/files/Gamut_Test_File_Flat.tif

  Why are my prints too dark?

  A video update of a piece written on the subject as soon as 2013

  In this 24 minute video, I'll cover:

  Your impressions are really too dark?

  Calibration of the screen and WYSIWYG

  Viewing print conditions

  In case of problems to get a match

  Avoiding the hacks who do not resolve the problem

  High resolution: http://digitaldog.net/files/Why_are_my_prints_too_dark.mp4

  Low resolution: https://youtu.be/iS6sjZmxjY4

• The color of some images not displayed correctly

  A lot of png images are the wrong color. For example a page the png is green while they should be blue. On the page linked below the laptop and the person are bright pink. When I save the pngs and open them using other software (or use another browser) the colors are correct.
  I use Firefox 6 on Ubuntu 11.04 on a MacPro

  This may be due to a problem with the profile for your monitor screen colors or color profiles embedded in images.

  You can disable color management to test whether the problem is the color on the computer profile.
  
  You can set the pref to 0 on the subject gfx.color_management.mode: configuration page to disable color management.
  
  You have to close and restart Firefox for the changes to take effect.
  
  See:

  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/GFX.color_management.mode

  See:

  • https://developer.Mozilla.org/en/ICC_color_correction_in_Firefox

  Warnings: The new color QCMS management system introduced in Firefox 3.5 currently only supports ICC version 2 color profiles, not version 4.

  To open the topic: config page, type Subject: config in the address bar (address) and press the 'Enter' key, as you type the url of a Web site to open a Web site.
  
  If you see a warning then you can confirm that you want to access this page.

  • Use the filter at the top bar of the on: page config to more easily spot a preference.
  • Preferences that have changed see the bold (user set).
  • Preferences you can restore the default value or change via the context menu.

• Tecra M1 and support external graphics resolution 1400 x 1050

  Hello!

  Are there special drivers or solutions that support the resolution 1400 x 1050 on an external monitor with Tecra M1?

  Spec. I do not have this resolution too choose:
  Trident XP4m32 graphics controller. 32 MB of video memory DDR
  Support of the exterior colors:
  1280 x 1024, 1024 x 768, 800 x 600; 100 Hz Non interlaced @ 16 M
  1600 x 1200; 85 Hz Non interlaced @ 16 M
  2048 x 1536, 1920 x 1440; 60 Hz Non interlaced @ 16 M

  / Shovel

  Hello

  Your favorite resolution 1400 x 1050 is not available because the graphics card or a chip of the graphics card driver does not support this resolution.

  In your manual, you can find details about the external resolutions supported and available.
  Check it out.

  If 1400 x 1050 is not mentioned then the GPU would not support this and that's why you would not be able to use it!

  Good bye

• colors look not smooth on my Droid X 2

  My droid X 2 shows colors in gradient type, but the same picture looks super smooth on my laptop, I don't understand, it's the phone supports 8 bits of color or my phone is defective.

  This is the pentile for you screen.

  But... isn't so much more wonderful on-screen to see sunlight as the DX?

  I wonder if it's a permanent compromise, however, or something that can be improved with a software update - color and image rendering process, I mean.

• HP LaserJet Pro 400 color MFP M475 - driver Linux

  According to the product description page, this printer is supposed to have a Linux driver available, but I can't locate one.

  Nobody knows where and when you can be available for download?

  Thanks in advance.

  HP LaserJet 400 colorMFP M475dn NPIE7A8DA

  OS: Linux (any flavor)

  I think that this is the site you need to get the information you're looking for:

  HP Linux imaging and printing

  Supported printers

  MFP color HP LaserJet 400 m475dw

• Color variation when you import a PDF file with transparency masks

  Hi, I have a CC PDF Illustrator with multiple pages and multiple spot colors defined by the user and on some pages of an element containing the mask transparency.

  The problem with color deviation between the pages with and without the object that contains the tx masks as they are imported into InDesign.

  Looking at the page in InDesign with the described object, color chart, imported from Illustrator no longer correspond to any PDF file.

  Without the mask tx, correspond to the Illustrator PDF color chart color placed in the shade in InDesign.

  What is going on?

  Unlike Illustrator, InDesign can support RGB and CMYK colors in the same document. If InDesign won't change the colors of your Illustrator object placed as long as there is no transparency on the spread.

  When transparency is applied to the spread, all objects have to 'mix' by using the same color space. I think that this is necessary if the transparency must be flattened as it should be for many printers. InDesign uses the color set under Edition space > space of merger of transparency to determine the color space. By default, it is a print CMYK document.

• Tiger Paw without background color

  Create a photo album on the State of the craftsman.  I have a picture of a tiger paw that I deleted the background color to and saved on a transparent background.   When I save it to download replaces the background white I

  do not want.  A save in JPEG, GIF, TIFF, but Artisan software does not recognize.

  How can I get just the bottomless Tiger paw.

  PRJ

  JPEG does not support transparency, Gif has bad color Tiff are not displayed by browsers use .png that support transparency and good color.

• I need help on the colors in first pro.

  I need help on the color in general information.

  http://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=vLEGtzyZ0Fs

  I made this video in AfterEffects and exported in color 16-bit png sequence.

  I then imported in first pro and added audio and some titles at the end.

  Now, I want to do is have a perfect version that I could watch on my pc.

  I used Mp4 h 264 to compress the video and it is on youtube.

  I think that this compressor support only 8-bit color because there are bands in the sky.

  Now, I have to make a version which is of very high quality that I can watch on my pc... I tried several codecs and it does not work.

  The problem is so long that there something on top of the png sequence in premirere pro as an image or something, it's like

  the displacement of the image in 8-bit color mode.

  It's using Avi Lagarith lossless codec

  Before there is a picture on top...

  

  Just after that, the image appears... As you can the there are a few bands on this image.

  I know it's subtle, but I want to know why this is happening.

  

  Is there something I'm missing... I took much too long to try to fix this.

  I ended up using the Quicktime animation codec for my video. The problem does not occur with this one, and I can't see any decline in the quality of the image.

  Now, I have a file compressed at low cost for online viewing and a huge file that I can watch on my computer.

  On a side note, can you guess how many hours it took for my computer make the png of this video sequence... 12 HOURS!

  Should I get a new computer...

  Thanks for the reply!

• Lightning is not applied to colored items (u3d)

  Take a look at the following teapot.pdf:

  http://DL.dropbox.com/u/4571/teapot.PDF

  The walls around the teapot are lightned, but it seems that the teapot is not lightned at all. The colors of the teapot are created by diffuse color table, as described in ECMA U3D (9.6.1.1.3.5). So my question is simple. Is Adobe Acrobat that does not apply to the Flash on the objects colored by a range of color and if so, why?

  PS: I ask whether it is the fault or the function of Adobe Acrobat or something else. I actually use converter IDTF created by:

  http://sourceforge.NET/projects/U3D/

  so maybe I just create the IDTF in wrong way.

  That the type of lighting is not supported. Because of the limitations of direct rendering on windows, 3D annotations support that point and colors of unique value.

• Is it possible to use or find colors plus five?

  Hello :-)

  Is it possible to find a harmony of eleven colors in adobe kuler?
  And - in this case how can I do this?

  Welcome Jasmine

  Hello jasmine,

  Kuler does not support more than five colors from now on. It would be great if you can talk about a few stream where you will find having more than five useful colors.

  Kind regards

  Kuler team

• PS Preferences - new document preset resolutions

  Gossip of dinosaurs...

  PS default 72 pixels per inch. It's ugly! More T - Rex the 1980 Atari s. What are harm am do, accept these flaws Eater scary (why doesn't Adobe read my system in a way to apply my control panel in preferences, like most other applications)?

  First step, Google "photoshop" "new document preset resolutions. Pumped in the first place by hackers Adobe PR, a just as old Adobe's Forum post some 10 odd years ago...

  Image and resolution of the monitor (read-only) ... related to, impression one that linked to Scan tips

  There, a person named Wo Tai Lao it is framed as the expert and she (?), he wrote make you a PNG 500x500px, enlarge it to the size, measure the inches with a ruler and divide by 500. WO and all its resources related saying, 'it's your screen resolution

  verification of the reality of 2016...

  Well, this is so the era post Nintendo Atari, not true? My Home Office using a Mac Pro from 2016. The screens use T2 connections. Work horse display is a Display Port version 1.4, with 1.2 billion colors on the 34-inch 2560 x 1440 resolution (oh yes! so-o-o easy on my BenQ eyes). My second T2 "scrap box" with 2.4 million colors on some old connection HDMI is a standard of 24-inch 1080 p 1920x1200px. Mac Pro automatically resets the fall less than the same functional resolution area that my bigger screen (naturally leaving the box of scrap to its color of 24 inches and resolution limits internal. Appears in the shape (thanks Apple)!

  Answer forum of Wo Tai Lao the star back to Adobe. It does not matter what size or resolution that I use Photoshop Document new Preset resolutions, 100px is always exactly 1 inch. But here's the real thicket...

  Adobe Photoshop will create new images with resolutions of age of Pierre Atari-Nintendo if let you it fixed to this bad thing. Question so very valid, what is this 72px default to? This means Photoshop needs to make website fav icons, using a Wo Tai Lao script the era fav-icon Adobe? Are we supposed to until something less primitive if we build, say wallpapers? Where is implemented in Adobe support on the preferences of this criticism?

  What we said...

  Telephone support me has said, "it does not matter." Then I shared the screen and showed how important it is to support and we were gruff said, well, "set it to what you want."

  What we like...

  Kind of limit to what sells in stores today, we have to settle by primitive defect in Photoshop. It should be placed here as a reminder that the software we use is... "established". Kinda like the size of column parameters must mean London Herald and the New York Times.

  

  You want to ensure that you could disintegrate the shit of Point/Pica size (is that). New Document Preset resolutions shows 300 pixels/inch. Our Canon MX 530 Series is actually 300 DPI, whatever that means in pixels? Hmm. The dinosaur croak like toad if we set Print and screen to 600?

  

  NCIS and Adobe

  "I'm so lost without Gibbs!"

  What screen and print resolutions want my babies?

  

  We'll go with Elf Lord of Pixels. Is this impression of Dino 300 resolution, or...

  x / 300 = 100 / 72 > x = 416.666666 Pixels/inch > or just 416?

  Someone, please help me!

  Adobe are largely correct that no matter how you set the screen resolution in Photoshop-except when you want to use the display 'size print'. Photoshop only cares about pixels and dots per inch review applies only when you print an image, but sometimes you don't want to see on the screen shows a picture with precision the size in inches or in centimeters and to do that you need to know the number of pixels per inch of your screen. Its not true 72 dpi is very outdated. If you are running 1920 x 1080 on a big flat screen figure will be around 80ppi (pixels/inch). It is only when the retina and other screens ultra high definition are used 72 dpi will start to look at the lowest.

  There are formulas to calculate the density of the screen, but an easy way is a screen like this calculator

  http://kingscalculator.com/en/other-calculators/pixel-density-calculator

  You just put to the screen size and resolution that you use and it displays a result

  

  As you can see a pretty big screen with an ordinary resolution is not special as density of screens is concerned. Once you have this number you put in the screen resolution box in preferences

  

  Now, when you want to see your image on the screen to size, it will print all you need to do is call the view "print size". The 81ppi parameter should not make a difference in another mode.

  

• Why move to creative cloud?

  I still don't understand why Adobe is forcing us to move to the creative Cloud?

  All these "benefits" that Adobe has served us, is just a marketing gimmick.

  Adobe said something like this: "all the most recent updates and features are immediately available for creative users Cloud" it's the new benefit? Front Creative Cloud updates did not yet exist? When Adobe release an update that I don't see why "from users of the box" also could not bring (updates) as users of creative Cloud? In both cases the user has to download the update (if he or she wants). Adobe also said something like this: "For updates of creative cloud members are available immediately" - it is discriminatory for the people who are for some reason any could not not want to buy creative cloud status, and who use 'from the box' Adobe. Why is less worthy than money who is subscribed to the creative cloud their money? When I buy a car inside and with the same engine, but in a different color that my neighbor's car, I expect to have the same car, but in different colors. Why this is not the case with Adobe? These statements are taken way to force people to register with creative cloud. I assume that CS7 (or posterior edition) will be available only for users of Cloud Creative and that Adobe will cease licensing "in the box" editions. Why Adobe won't give users the option to choose where to spend their money and what to buy and how to use it (online or offline)?
  

  "Each Subscriber creative cloud have 20GB of storage available! Hey! How many HD images, we can store there? With external hard drives from 1 to 2 to anyone can buy for $ 100-150 Adobe offering 20 GB of storage as a better solution? What is the fastest solution: HDD service or cloud? "The files stored in the cloud are more secure than those HDD (s) of the user"? Someone at Adobe has heard for backup? I have a PC for about 20 years and do not have any single problem with HARD drive malfunction. So, Adobe, please tell us what is the REAL reason why you want us to store OUR files on YOUR servers? Anyone can share their files with who ever they want to use e-mail (for smaller files), and there are so many FREE web storage services, then why do we need pay for something that we already have for free Adobe? I use a free web storage to keep my files, then open them with Adobe software current, directly from network and HARD drive, and they will be automatically updated as soon as I save. Also I can access anywhere where I am and share them with whom I dream. So I really don't see why people are buying this marketing tip called creative cloud?

  Only REAL reason to create something as creative cloud, as far as I can see it, is to stop piracy, and this is something that I truly support. But I would really like to see that such a large company stop using these discriminatory methods on their users!

  I use Adobe Premiere since version 6 and After effects since the first edition so many years ago... All these years, never crossed my mind that Adobe could someday discriminatory to their users in a way!
  

  Adobe, please offer us the opportunity to CHOOSE equal products - not the same but different products (at the same time)!

  Thank you!
  

  I'm not here for a lesson in trade laws. Or I don't defend Adobe.  I'm saying that an American company like Adobe, Apple or Microsoft must respect the laws of the country in which they are headquartered.   It's the same for companies whose headquarters is in France, Germany, Singapore, Russia, Japan, etc...

  I was not talking about major updates. I spoke to all the updates because Adobe said that all the updates will be immediately available to users of creative Cloud (only).

  I think you're confused by the differences between a regular cycle update and an upgrade of the main product.   These are two different things.

  Licensed users continue to receive all updates before just like regular cycle.  And as before, they can't buy a upgrade of main product until Adobe officially releases.  Nothing has changed in this regard.   Perpetual license always users get updates as they always have.

  While it is true that Cloud users do not have to wait long for the major updates, it could be argued (and I do not disagree) that cloud members are used as "beta-testers".  Some of the improvements immediately released was botched and less received successfully.  I think it's a downside to this new policy and one that Adobe needs to address in the coming months.

  I also asked why all the software Adobe is not available for users of"the box"? Why can't I buy Adobe Muse without membership creative cloud?

  If 'from the box' you mean a perpetual license, I don't know the answer to that.  All I can say is Muse is a relatively new product.  Maybe Adobe has not determined how or where MU joined the family of Adobe products.  It is the same for high-tech products.  You will have to ask Adobe about it.

  By the way, after May 1, "box" software will be no longer available.  Adobe Creative Suite products purchased on a perpetual license will be performed by download only.

  Creative Cloud users do not have the same opportunities. Adobe forcing users to move to creative cloud giving them immediate updates, more software to buy etc.

  It's called incentives, and it is fundamental to good marketing.  You have something new, you want people to buy if you give them good incentives to try.  I don't have a problem with that.

  Nancy O.

• No assistance on a professional monitor

  Hi all

  I use AJA Cona 3 G, looking for a professional monitor under $4000, so I got those:

  1 - JVC 21 "truth series DT-V21G11Z LCD monitor

  http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/849456-reg/JVC_DT_V21G11Z_21_Verite_Series_DT_V21G11 http://www.CPUID.com/softwares/CPU-z.html

  
  

  2 - JVC 17 "DT-V17G15 multiformat HD LCD Monitor

  http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/907175-reg/jvc_dt_v17g15z_17_verite_g_series_hd_lcd. HTML

  
  

  3 - Panasonic LCD 21.5 "Studio monitor

  http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/891005-reg/Panasonic_bt_lh2170pj_21_5_LCD_Studio_Mon itor.html

  
  

  4 - Sony PVM-1741 photo OLED monitor (17 '')

  http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/766409-reg/Sony_PVM_1741_PVM_1741_OLED_Picture_Monit or.html

  
  

  I appreciate any suggestions,

  Thank you

  Sheriff

  OK, thanks to all, I'll go to the ISP, they have convinced me after contacting them and below is the results:

  ME:

  Hi, I'm looking for a good monitor

  for C.G. (10-bit, playback 1080 50i & 25 1080 p).

  If you would inform my why should screaming your LM - 2461W 24 '' not others like:

  -Panasonic BT-LH2550

  http://www.Panasonic.com/business/ProVideo/BT-LH2550.asp

  -JVC DT-V24G11Z

  http://Pro.JVC.com/Prof/attributes/features.jsp?model_id=MDL102068

  -Wöhler RMQ-230-3 G

  http://www.Wohler.com/details.aspx?ItemNumber=RMQ-230-3G

  http://www.TVTechnology.com/article/Wohler-RMQ--g-video-monitor/216882

  -17 "TV logic XVM-175W (true 10-bit)

  http://www.abelcine.com/store/TV-logic-xVM-175W-17-inch-multi-format-L
  CD-HD-SD-monitor.

  ISP:

  In general our instructors will offer the best combination of performance, features and price compared any competitor. However, in direct comparison with the units you list there are some very clear benefits for the LM-2461W.

  1 BTLH-2550. This device is not 10 bit.its year10 bit treatment (just the fact that they can accept a 10-bit signal), but the Panel is 8 bits with a color depth of 16.7 million colors, not 10 bits in 1.073 billion colors. It is also fairly old Panel technology that has other drawbacks as shifts more colors off-axis than most modern monitors.

  2 DT-V24G11Z. Like the Panasonic is not a 10-bit screen. Yet once, 10bits treatment does not mean that there is a 10-bit Panel.

  3 Wöhler. Once again, an 8-bit, 10-bit monitor not just like the previous two.

  4 XVM-175W. It is a good 10-bit monitor, but it's very expensive for a 17 "monitor. If you want a unit 10 bit 17 ' then our CM-170W might be a good review. However, the XVM-175W and LM-2461W are the same price in order to get a unit of 24 "for the same price as a unit 17". For use in a studio 17 "is going to be very small, so the 24" clearly has the advantage here. The XVM-245W is more similar to our LM-2461W (same size, performance, etc.), but it will cost more than twice as much as our monitor (vs $ $12,000 5 000)

  ME:

  OK, what about the IKEGAMI:

  http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/739821-reg/Ikegami_HLM_2450WB_HLM_2450WB_Multi_Forma t_LCD_Monitor.html

  
  

  ISP:

  We have won several shootings against this exact unit. Most customers agree that the LM-2461W has better display performance and there certainly many more features including things like 12 extended mode, measure of level of pixel and much more. Also, don't forget that the Ikegami does NOT come with the 3 Gbps SDI standard. It only comes with the HD - SDI. If you want to support the formats more advanced as 4:4:4 signals, 1080 p 50/60, etc, which is not possible on the Ikegami unless you buy 3G optional entry (costs about $1,200), which will make the unit around the same price as the LM-2461W.

  I also know that visitors have never really received an answer as to if the device has a panel of 8 or 10 bits. If you look at their own record, it seems, the Panel is actually of 8-bit, 10-bit (http://www.ikegami.com/br/products/hdtv/pdf/hlm2450w.pdf). Unity also clearly lack of advanced support all formats such as LM-2461W (e.g., it does not support XYZ, 12 bit, DCI P3, etc..)

  For basically the same price so equipped in the same way the LM-2461W offers the best performance, more features and a wide range of signal support. You can also get quick answers to technical applications.

  The end

  http://www.careydissmore.com/?p=207

  Thank you all,

  Sheriff.