Performance SDO_DISTANCE

Table A_SPATIAL has 15 million records with different values of longitude and latitude. I also have the SDO_GEOMETRY shape, which stores the column SDO_GEOMETRY (2001, 8307, MDSYS.) SDO_POINT_TYPE (LONGITUDE, LATITUDE, NULL), NULL, NULL).

I created the function and the index below:

create or replace function get_long_lat_pt(longitude in number,  
                                         latitude in number)  
return SDO_GEOMETRY deterministic is  
begin  
return sdo_geometry(2001, 8307,  
                sdo_point_type(longitude, latitude, NULL),NULL, NULL);  
end;  
/ 
INSERT INTO user_sdo_geom_metadata VALUES(  
'A_SPATIAL', -- table  
'SHAPE', -- function  
   mdsys.sdo_dim_array( 
      mdsys.sdo_dim_element('LONGITUDE', -180, 180, 0.005),  
      mdsys.sdo_dim_element('LATITUDE', -90, 90, 0.005)  
   ), 
   8307  -- SRID  
    ); 
commit;  
CREATE INDEX A_SPATIAL_SHAPE_IDX  
ON A_SPATIAL(Shape)  
INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX;  

Then when I run the query below, it performs a full table scan. Even though I have the index above, the index get used because I use SDO_DISTANCE to wrap around her, I guess. The longitude and latitude provided to the get_long_lat_pt function below are some user input, and they all vary.

select * from A_SPATIAL where  
SDO_GEOM.SDO_DISTANCE(SHAPE, get_long_lat_pt(95.224, 31.601), 1, 'unit=MILE') < 20;  

Issues related to the:

1. What is the optimal way of running this query to perform the best? I guess the full table scan is obvious as I need to calculate the distance, but is there a way to improve the performance?

2 is the index above or even useful at all?

3. I use SDO_WITHIN_DISTANCE in my case, but it would run a full table in any case scan because I still need to calculate the distance. He would perform better than the example above?

Thank you.

The only difference in your queries (Simplified) is the max_resolution of the additional parameter, it is only applied in the other, but max_resolution = 400 is big enough?

Don't know if it makes a difference separating the parameters with ',' I got the same result.

'distance=400, max_resolution=400 , unit=mile') = 'TRUE';
'distance=400 max_resolution=400, unit=mile') = 'TRUE';

You can try to force ORACLE to use the INDEX and the execution of test plan:

SELECT /*+ INDEX (g a_spatial_shape_idx) */
       SDO_GEOM.SDO_DISTANCE(shape, get_long_lat_pt(95.224, 31.601),0.001,'unit=mile') dist
  FROM a_spatial g
 WHERE SDO_WITHIN_DISTANCE(shape, get_long_lat_pt(95.224, 31.601),'distance=400 unit=mile') = 'TRUE'
 ORDER BY dist;

If you can use the postal code instead of lat/lon for the query results, of course, create an index on the zip code, use it in the WHERE clause and test execution plan.

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • Vs MDSYS Haversine formula. SDO_GEOM. SDO_DISTANCE

    We need calculate the distance between 2 lat/long (from the GPS unit).

    What is more precise, the use of MDSYS. SDO_GEOM. SDO_DISTANCE or a hand coded formula Haversine?

    Thank you
    JB

    Well, the best thing to do is to perform a test.

    I looked at this website: http://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong-vincenty.html

    The answer to the default functional demo is 969954.114 meters.

    Test with SDO_DISTANCE, we get (I converted values DMS to DD):

    select sdo_geom.sdo_distance(
              sdo_geometry(2001,8307,sdo_point_type(-5.71475,      50.0663222222,null),null,null),
              sdo_geometry(2001,8307,sdo_point_type(-3.07009444444,58.6440222222,null),null,null),
              0.05) as dist
      from dual;
    -- Result
    --
    969954.113110585
    

    Which is pretty similar!

    So, don't bother coding your own Haversine (you need to add additional parameters to pass in parameters to ellisodal for non - WGS84 SRID...), use what comes out of the box.

    That answer your question? If so, please give points.

    concerning
    Simon

  • Crashing apps and the slow performance since the installation of macOS Sierra

    Hello

    Im a user of long date Mac but displays the first time that I was pretty happy with everything that on my macbook pro for the past years... until I installed Sierra a day ago.

    Since installing everything works super slow and a lot of my apps hang and crash. Things are not rosy, here is my EtreCheck report - running current version 10.12 on my MacBook Pro (mid 2010) if anyone can help would be much appreciated. Thank you

    EtreCheck version: 3.0.6 (315)

    Report generated 2016-10-07 16:52:11

    Download EtreCheck from https://etrecheck.com

    Time 06:53

    Performance: Below average

    Click the [Support] links to help with non-Apple products.

    Click [details] for more information on this line.

    Problem: Apps are broken

    Hardware Information:

    MacBook Pro Intel Core i5, Intel Core i7 (mid-2010)

    [Data sheet] - [User Guide] - [warranty & Service]

    MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro6, 2

    1 2.53 GHz Intel Core i5 CPU: 2 strands

    4 GB of RAM expandable - [Instructions]

    BANK 0/DIMM0

    OK 2 GB DDR3 1067 MHz

    BANK 1/DIMM0

    OK 2 GB DDR3 1067 MHz

    Bluetooth: Old - transfer/Airdrop2 not supported

    Wireless: en1: 802.11 a/b/g/n

    Battery: Health = Normal - Cycle count = 371

    Video information:

    Intel HD Graphics

    NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M - VRAM: 256 MB

    Color LCD 1440 x 900

    Software:

    macOS Sierra 10.12 (A 16, 323) - since startup time: less than an hour

    Disc information:

    Hitachi HTS545050B9SA02 disk0: (500,11 GB) (rotation)

    EFI (disk0s1) < not mounted >: 210 MB

    Recovery HD (disk0s3) < not mounted > [recovery]: 650 MB

    BOOTCAMP (disk0s4) / Volumes/BOOTCAMP: 86,37 (Go 31,68 free)

    Macintosh HD (disk 1) / [Startup]: 412,50 (GB 158,46 free)

    Encrypted AES - XTS unlocked

    Storage of carrots: disk0s2 412.88 GB Online

    MATSHITADVD-R UJ-898)

    USB information:

    Logitech USB receiver

    Card reader Apple

    Apple Inc. Apple keyboard / Trackpad

    Apple Inc. BRCM2070 hub.

    Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB host controller.

    Computer, Inc. Apple IR receiver.

    Built-in ISight from Apple Inc..

    Guardian:

    Mac App Store and identified developers

    Kernel extensions:

    / System/Library/Extensions

    com [no charge]. Huawei.driver.HuaweiDataCardDriver (4.0.6 - 2016-10-04) [Support]

    com [loading]. Logitech.Control Center.HID Driver (3.5.1 - SDK 10.0 - 2016-10-04) [Support]

    com [no charge]. Driver Logitech.Unifying.HID (1.2.0 - SDK 10.0 - 2016-10-04) [Support]

    [no charge] com.leapfrog.driver.LfConnectDriver (1.0.6 - SDK 10.0 - 2016-10-04) [Support]

    NET [no charge]. Thomson.iokit.USBLAN_usbpart (1.6.0 - 2016-10-04) [Support]

    Startup items:

    HWNetMgr: Path: / Library/StartupItems/HWNetMgr

    Startup items is no longer function in OS X Yosemite or later

    Launch system officers:

    [no charge] 7 tasks Apple

    tasks of Apple 178 [loading]

    tasks of Apple 86 [performance]

    Launch system demons:

    [no charge] 42 tasks of Apple

    tasks of Apple 167 [loading]

    tasks of Apple 95 [performance]

    Launch officers:

    [performance] com Logitech.Control Center.Daemon.plist (2011-11-05) [Support]

    [loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater - 1.0.plist (2015-09-18) [Support]

    [cannot] com.adobe.CS5ServiceManager.plist (2010-07-14) [Support]

    [loading] com.google.keystone.agent.plist (2016-07-13) [Support]

    [cannot] com.teamviewer.teamviewer.plist (08 / 08/2015) [Support]

    [cannot] com.teamviewer.teamviewer_desktop.plist (08 / 08/2015) [Support]

    Launch demons:

    [loading] com.adobe.SwitchBoard.plist (2010-07-14) [Support]

    com.Adobe.agsservice.plist [running] (2016-08-19) [Support]

    [loading] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist (2016-08-30) [Support]

    [loading] com.apple.installer.osmessagetracing.plist (2016-09-14)

    [loading] com.google.keystone.daemon.plist (2016-09-02) [Support]

    [loading] com.teamviewer.Helper.plist (2015-03-03) [Support]

    [cannot] com.teamviewer.teamviewer_service.plist (08 / 08/2015) [Support]

    User launch officers:

    [loading] com.adobe.AAM.Updater - 1.0.plist (2010-07-16) [Support]

    [loading] com.adobe.ARM. [...]. plist (2011-09-13) [Support]

    [loading] com.adobe.ARM. [...]. plist (2010-07-14) [Support]

    com.nero.HSMMonitor.plist [running] (2016-10-07) [Support]

    Plug-ins Internet:

    DirectorShockwave: 12.0.6r147 - SDK 10.6 (2013-11-25) [Support]

    OVSHelper: 1.0 (2010-12-10) [Support]

    OfficeLiveBrowserPlugin: 12.3.6 (2013-03-22) [Support]

    NP_2020Player_WEB: 5.0.7.0 (2011-04-03) [Support]

    AdobeAAMDetect: AdobeAAMDetect 1.0.0.0 - SDK 10.6 (2015-09-18) [Support]

    FlashPlayer - 10.6: 23.0.0.162 - SDK 10.9 (2016-09-29) [Support]

    AdobePDFViewerNPAPI: 11.0.10 - SDK 10.6 (2014-12-03) [Support]

    DivXBrowserPlugin: 2.1 (2010-12-10) [Support]

    QuickTime Plugin: 7.7.3 (2016-09-14)

    Flash Player: 23.0.0.162 - SDK 10.9 (2016-09-29) is unable to contact Adobe

    iPhotoPhotocast: 7.0 (2010-07-14)

    Silverlight: 5.1.30514.0 - SDK 10.6 (2015-01-17) [Support]

    AdobePDFViewer: 11.0.10 - SDK 10.6 (2015-03-29) [Support]

    JavaAppletPlugin: 15.0.1 - 10.12 (2013-10-25) check the version of the SDK

    User Plug-ins internet:

    Picasa: 1.0 (2011-03-29) [Support]

    Safari extensions:

    DivX HiQ - DivX, Inc. - http://www.divx.com/en/software/divx-plus/web-player/ (2010-12-21)

    DivX Plus Web Player HTML5 < video > - DivX, Inc. - http://www.divx.com/en/software/divx-plus/web-player/ (2010-12-21)

    3rd party preference panes:

    DivX (2010-12-10) [Support]

    Flash Player (2016-08-30) [Support]

    Logitech Control Center (2011-11-05) [Support]

    Time Machine:

    Time Machine not configured!

    Top of page process CPU:

    5% kernel_task

    5% WindowServer

    1% com.apple.AmbientDisplayAgent

    1% xpcproxy

    0% fontd

    Top of page process of memory:

    Kernel_task 432 MB

    Mdworker (15) 430 MB

    Airmail beta 283 MB

    152 MB Finder

    Sandboxd 147 MB

    Virtual memory information:

    476 MB free RAM

    3.53 GB used RAM (1.41 GB being cached)

    Used Swap 0 B

    Diagnostic information:

    7 October 2016, 16:39:48 Self test - passed

    7 October 2016, 16:20:48 ~/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/Airmail Beta_2016-10-07-162048_ [redacted] .crash

    / Applications/Airmail Beta.app/Contents/MacOS/Airmail Beta

    October 6, 2016, 08:17:31 PM/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/App Store_2016-10-06-201731_ [redacted] .hang

    / Applications/App Store Store.app/Contents/MacOS/App

    October 6, 2016, 07:52:21 PM/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/station air Beta_2016-10-06-195221_ [redacted] .hang

    October 6, 2016, 14:37:32 /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/Preview_2016-10-06-143732_[redacted].hang

    /Applications/preview.app/Contents/MacOS/preview

    October 6, 2016, 02:37:26 PM/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/station air Beta_2016-10-06-143726_ [redacted] .hang

    October 6, 2016, 14:37:22 /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/firefox_2016-10-06-143722_[redacted].hang

    /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/Firefox

    October 6, 2016, 14:37:18 /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/Pages_2016-10-06-143718_[redacted].hang

    /Applications/pages.app/Contents/MacOS/pages

    October 6, 2016, 14:37:12 /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/AdobeAcrobat_2016-10-06-143712_[redacted].hang

    / / Applications/Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro/Adobe Acrobat Pro.app/Contents/MacOS/AdobeAcrobat

    October 6, 2016, 14:36:50 /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/Preview_2016-10-06-143650_[redacted].hang

    UNKNOWN PATH

    Try this first: what happens if you start in safe mode (hold down the SHIFT key during startup), the problems go away?

    Try this second in normal startup mode: what happens if you create a new user account and log in as that user, the problems go away?

    I'm not sure I'd worry about the plane crashes - it is listed as beta software

  • AFP vs SMB performance

    I've just updated to the latest version of Sierra.  I thought I had read somewhere that SMB was preferred over the AFP in Sierra and that performance would improve.  I don't see any improvement.  My results are so radically different, I thought that I post to see if anyone can tell me why my performance SMB is so catastrophic?

    I have a Mac Pro (non-cylindre) on a home network wired gigabit.  Synology DS412 + NAS running 4 disks in RAID 5.  I mounted it my my Mac using the basic option "Connect to Server" in the Finder and typing "afp://server:share" and "smb://server:share" for testing.  Both were mounted and tested separately, which means I am disconnected from the AFP before Assembly and test SMB.  I used rsync with some verbose options to copy a 1.5 GB file in order to see the speed and get a transfer of the statistics.

    Here are the stats to transfer the file to AFP:

    [josh@jeter /joshtmp]-> transfer diskimage. ISO/Volumes/FILES/tmp /.

    Building file list...

    1 file to examine

    DiskImage. ISO

    1.49 G 100% 52.18 MB/s 0:00:27 (xfer #1,-check = 0/1)

    Number of files: 1

    Number of transferred files: 1

    File size: 1.49 G bytes

    The total size of the transferred file: 1.49 G bytes

    Literal data: 1.49 G bytes

    Matched data: 0 bytes

    Size of the file list: 121

    List of files generation time: 0.002 seconds

    List of files transfer time: 0.000 seconds

    Total number of bytes sent: 1.49 G

    Total number of bytes received: 42

    received bytes sent to 1.49 G 42 bytes 52,20 M bytes/s

    total size is 1.49 G speedup is 1.00

    I think it's a pretty decent speed, but my concern is not the top speed, is the disparity.

    Here is the SMB speed:

    [josh@jeter /joshtmp]-> transfer diskimage. ISO/Volumes/FILES/tmp /.

    Building file list...

    1 file to examine

    DiskImage. ISO

    1.49 G 100% 18.02 MB/s 0:01:18 (xfer #1,-check = 0/1)

    Number of files: 1

    Number of transferred files: 1

    File size: 1.49 G bytes

    The total size of the transferred file: 1.49 G bytes

    Literal data: 1.49 G bytes

    Matched data: 0 bytes

    Size of the file list: 121

    List of files generation time: 0.001 seconds

    List of files transfer time: 0.000 seconds

    Total number of bytes sent: 1.49 G

    Total number of bytes received: 42

    received bytes sent to 1.49 G 42 bytes 18,71 M bytes/s

    total size is 1.49 G speedup is 1.00

    Also, here is the info from statshare to see how it was mounted:

    [josh@jeter /joshtmp]-> smbutil statshares - a

    ================================================================================ ==================

    THE ACTION ATTRIBUTE VALUE TYPE

    ================================================================================ ==================

    FILES

    Server_name rivera

    USER_ID 1026

    SMB_NEGOTIATE SMBV_NEG_SMB1_ENABLED

    SMB_NEGOTIATE SMBV_NEG_SMB2_ENABLED

    SMB_NEGOTIATE SMBV_NEG_SMB3_ENABLED

    SMB_VERSION SMB_3.0

    SMB_SHARE_TYPE DISK

    SIGNING_SUPPORTED TRUE

    EXTENDED_SECURITY_SUPPORTED TRUE

    LARGE_FILE_SUPPORTED TRUE

    CLIENT_REQUIRES_SIGNING TRUE

    DFS_SUPPORTED TRUE

    MULTI_CREDIT_SUPPORTED TRUE

    ENCRYPTION_SUPPORTED TRUE

    SIGNING_ON TRUE

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------

    In addition, attached is a screenshot of my share of the Synology settings.  It shows the parameters of the SMB and AFP.  The pop-out box is the options 'Advanced settings' of the SMB section.

    Any ideas at all?  Please and thank you.

    See Image here.

    It seems that Apple still did not set their "quick and dirty" dose for such Badlock described in this thread: El Capitan 10.11.5 update slow SMB (bug)

    If you believe that your network is protected from man-in-the-middle attacks and the bug Badlock, then you can disable the client for signature.

    1. Create a nsmb.conf file in / etc with vim. sudo will be necessary.
    2. Write to the file:

    [default]

    signing_required = no


    Then restart your machine. Your SMB3 speeds should be comparable to the AFP again.

    Here is the post above: Re: Re: Re: Re: update of El Capitan 10.11.5 slow SMB (bug)

  • MacBook Pro 15 "end 2013 too slow performance

    Hello world

    My macbook pro 15 "end 2013 me294, Core i7 haswell 2.3 Ghz, 16 GB Ram, SSD PCI 256 GB, GT 750 m & Iris Pro.

    Geek of multicore benchmarks is too less to another macbook even type (me 294).

    It's my macbook: multi-core on 6000 landmarks

    https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/CPU/337791

    https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/CPU/337570

    This is another of the same type (me 294): multi-core on 12000 landmarks

    https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/CPU/search?q=model: % 22MacBook % 20Pro % 20 (15 - h % 20Retina % 20Late % 202013 Inc.) % 22% 20platform:...

    I reboot before benchmarks, I don't know why?

    GeekBench is a crude tool that is useful for computers compare configured identically. Means "Identically configured" quite the same hardware running identically configured systems with identical changes, as appropriate.

    As says Geekbench works best when it is the only application running. Comparing the performance of your Mac to others requires the abandonment of all other open applications in addition to process who can have no user interface.

    To identify the processes that are running on your Mac in order to see how they affect the activity and performance of your Mac, use the activity monitor: use the activity monitor to your Mac - Apple Support.

  • Reinstall 10.7.5 to help performance

    Late 2009 iMac 10.6.1 when new, now running 10.7.5 with 8 GB of memory and 2 TB of disk running

    My Mac worked slowly for a while. Check memory, CPU etc. in the activity monitor shows no reason for this.

    I want to reinstall the OS X 10.7.5 menu utilities in OS X, but I have no USB or disk with 10.7 on it.

    Given a stage to try and BONE cleaning is to wipe the drive, then I suppose I'll have 10.7 on some media.

    I believe that the steps would be:

    1. all save, deauthorise apps

    2 restart the Mac in recovery mode

    3 erase/format the disc extended journaled format

    4 reinstall OS X

    Who would bring back me to 10.6.1 that came with the Mac, so I have to upgrade to 10.6.8 then 10.7 as soon as I got it on a media, and then work my back to 10.7.5

    So, how I 10.7 or y at - it an easier way to get my Mac running as it was when new?

    Thank you.

    Frank.

    With 8 GB of memory and a HD 2 to (assuming that it has enough free space available on it) and your Mac must perform well. Mac in general do not need 'clean up', but they have a third-party software installed that can cause performance problems. Before you go to the backup, erase, re - install, upgrade to Lion road you can download and run EtreCheck and post the contents of his report here. Can anyone identify if there is a probable cause of software to your problem:

    http://etrecheck.com/

  • My email has been hacked and used to send Spam. I have to perform a virus check, or simply change the password?

    My email has been hacked and used to send Spam. I have to perform a virus check, or simply change the password?

    Do not install or run an anti virus app.

    How do you know that your email has been "hacked"? It is a common practice for spammers to forge an envoy from the e-mail address. It may be that your email address has been misused. There's nothing to do if this is the case for you. The spammer will soon pass and usurp another email address.

    It's a good idea to immediately change your password by email if someone would actually managed to access your e-mail account.

  • poor performance iTunes 12.4.3.1

    iTunes 12.4.3.1 worst level ever? Incomplete, burning playlists, software crashes frequently, slow dead URL, performance, WIN7

    For general advice, see troubleshooting problems with iTunes for Windows updates.

    The steps described in the second case are a guide to remove everything related to iTunes and then rebuild what is often a good starting point, unless the symptoms indicate a more specific approach.

    Review the other boxes and other support documents list to the bottom of the page, in case one of them applies.

    The more information box has direct links with the current and recent if you have problems to download, must revert to an older version or want to try the version of iTunes for Windows (64-bit - for older video cards) as a workaround for problems with installation or operation, or compatibility with third-party software.

    Backups of your library and device should be affected by these measures but there are links to backup and recovery advice there.

    TT2

  • Beach ball of death as well as by the slow performance of spinning glaciers

    Hi people,

    I have been enduring the beach ball of death from a spinning some time now in the calculation of my daily life and I just can't take longer, as long as it happens little matter what I do on the Mac, and performance are slowed by the glaciers.

    It happens all the time.

    I ran several ladies of virus, including clams and none of them came with something.

    The problem came slowly over a long period of time. Now, however, the beach ball takes over whenever I'm on Mac to the point that I have to force quit, and then restart just to get anything done, and even then, it is not long until the ball is back and performance slows down again.

    Thank you in advance for any help you can provide.

    Please let me know if you need more information than that on my computer:

    Model name: iMac
    Model identifier: iMac12, 1
    Processor name: Intel Core i5
    Processor speed: 2.5 GHz
    Number of processors: 1
    Total number of cores: 4
    L2 Cache (by heart): 256 KB
    L3 Cache Memory: 6 MB
    Memory: 4 GB
    Boot ROM version: IM121.0047.B23
    Version of the SCM (System): 1.71f22

    With gratitude,

    AK

    Please post a report of EtreCheckof your system. We then look for obvious problems. Please click on the link, download the application and run the report. Once you have the report, please copy and paste into your response to this post.

    If you would like more information on what is EtreCheck, just click on the link and you will find a description of the application.

    It is very possible that your problem much worse by installing antivirus on your computer applications. AV apps for Mac are useless, there is no virus for OS X. Most tend to create more problems than they solve so look for developers instructions to uninstall (s) installed and uninstall them.  Run the EtreCheck report after it has been uninstalled. OS X needs no antivirus, cleanup or ANY third party maintenance apps. If left alone and simply updated OS X will run well for most users for years!

  • MainStage - loss of connectivity environment performance

    Hi guys,.

    I seem to lose connectivity between my midi controller (m-audio code 61) and Mainstage environment performance. I lost sound and the warning message on the Mainstage saying that the midi controller is no longer available. Currently, I connect via the USB port, which also fuels the midi controller. I have to disconnect and reconnect the USB cable on the midi controller or laptop and then it seems to work again. Any ideas on how to solve this problem?

    Try another USB cable. A premium quality cable may be the solution. The connectors tend to have a tighter fit. Another alternative is to use a power supply and a USB MIDI cable, or connect via a cable to your audio interface MIDI, if it has a MIDI.

  • Concerned about the performance of the battery Ipod 6

    Hello!. Please tell me your thoughts on this because I have no idea about. I bought a new Ipod 6 a week ago. I think that the battery is not give the performance of desire. He's dead, and after a charge noticed that drain you very quickly. So I turned off bluetooth, reduces the brightness of the screen and wifi on when I used it. I loaded 100% today, and according to the battery report used for 1 h and 50 min. (audio, videos Youtube Safari 91% Config Kindle of 5%, Home and Lock Screen 3%, 1%), time to sleep 10: 00 and 9 min. and the battery icon displays between 50 and 60 per cent of costs. It is the average or do you think the device is defective? Thanks in advance.

    On the basis of messages as your battery life seems comparable to others. Note that % battery is not accurate on an iPod, then you can not go this way.

    The test is responsible for at least 6 hours and read a video. You should get 5-6 hours

  • East-audio/video or advertising photos in the tab 'not open' affect the performance of Firefox?

    From what I understand the audio Forum leaking by a tab can be cut. This means that the most important activity such as periodic updates on a page to download advertisements could also affect Firefox performance even if the tab has not been clicked. Is this true?

    Once the tab has been loaded, any video or audio active in this tab will have a negative impact on the performance of Firefox.

    In the options, you can tell Firefox to not load the tab until it is selected, but once you select the tab for the first time, the site will remain responsible.

  • Twitter: Your account may not perform this action. Please, refresh the page and try again.

    Since the update to Firefox 41.0.2 I couldn't use Twitter.com. When I try to tweet, favorite, or retweet the following error occurs. Your account may be able to perform this action. Please, refresh the page and try again. There are a couple of other users who have the same problem, but it was tinkered with Mozilla and the other pending.

    It started with the update to 41.0.2 and twitter works in all other browsers, but not Mozilla.

    Here's this other thread with the DIY: Impossible of Retweet, tweet or articles favorite on Twitter, even when I refresh the page.

    I think there must be a setting or a question Add on. Your extensions look pretty standard, so I'm leaning towards a parameter of the problem. You could test as follows:

    By default, Windows hides the .js extension. To make sure that the following steps work, you have to disable this feature, at least temporarily. This article has the steps: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/show-hide-file-name-extensions

    Open the settings folder (AKA Firefox profile) current Firefox help

    • button "3-bar" menu > "?" button > troubleshooting information
    • (menu bar) Help > troubleshooting information
    • type or paste everything: in the address bar and press Enter

    In the first table of the page, click on the view file"" button. This should launch a new window that lists the various files and folders in Windows Explorer.

    Leave this window open, switch back to Firefox and output, either:

    • "3-bar" menu button > button "power".
    • (menu bar) File > Exit

    Pause while Firefox finishing its cleanup, then rename prefs.js to something like prefs.old.

    Launch Firefox back up again and it must use the default settings (for example, integrated home page). If you need to restore your previous session windows and tabs, go ahead and select restore previous Session from the history menu.

    Twitter works best? If so, we could try to understand the precise adjustment at fault or you could rebuild your settings. Or you can undo the change by renaming the new prefs.js to prefs.txt and rename prefs.old back to prefs.js (with Firefox closed, as you did before) and understand it through a little trial and error.

  • Increase the performance of MAC with the SSD upgrade

    I have a 21.5-inch iMac model 14.1 (end 2013) with 8 GB of memory and a 1 TB drive. On this, I use some applications in memory such as Adobe CS 5.5 and VMWare Fusion 8.1.1. I have Applecare on the machine until September 2017. I often find myself running out of memory. My goto solution would be to increase the memory and replace the hard drive with an SSD. I fear, however, that this cancels my Applecare. My research indicates that while that frowned upon, I can upgrade my memory and keep my Applecare as long as it is done by an authorized by Apple, but if I do the SSD I'm out of luck for the installed components. My thought is that I can get an external SSD and move the ' WIndows 10' VM (s), as well as expand and move the swapfiles for the SSD system.»

    My questions are am I right about the Applecare and warranty and I plan to use an external SSD to accelerate performance and ease the work of memory constraints?

    I have f

    I have a Macbook Air in 2010 and also a 2008 iMac - both with only 4 GB of memory (you have twice as much), both running El Capitan and the two with SSD - and perform very well. The 2008 iMac used to have a rotating disc which has recently failed, with the replacement of SSD, it is a remarkable transformation with the new SSD, it seems very quickly for me. Both have Photoshop CS4, which is not used much more, but they run this software very well, as well as MS Office 2011 and other programs such as Mail, Safari, Firefox, etc. (Firefox + Photoshop together put a noticeable load on machines, in fact, but while I sometimes hear the fans come on the Macbook Air, it maintains not up very well) No slowdown) You'll be in great shape with a SSD for your newer computer. These old machines that I use have Core 2 Duo CPUs, chips relatively slow, but they seem very quickly with the SSD.

    You will need to check with Apple directly on your AppleCare and so that would be affected. I don't know that anyone is not Apple should trust this question.

  • Performance of YouTube on some videos

    So I came across a strange bug that I can reproduce on my MBP 2014 (Iris Pro) and my iMac end 2015 (with GPU), some videos on YouTube compleltey kill the performance of tabs. Stutters and takes about 4 seconds to go full screen, dropping about 100 images each time the page (if you look at "Stats for nerds" of Youtube). While the other videos of the same chain run perfectly, silky.

    Example of poor performance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahwV3JCDMzE

    Example of excellent performance: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8TiGWkoStI

    Only of one week difference between downloads...

    How to replicate, just load to the top of the video in 1080 p, then scroll quickly up and down, double-click on it to go full-screen, that sort of thing...

    Please let me know if you have the experience, can't reproduce the problem on chrome.

    Thank you!

    Well, I'm sorry to say, I wasn't able to recreate it: https://youtu.be/bQM4XRw9xpc

    I guess what I would try is to restart your computer and make sure that Safari is updated.

Maybe you are looking for