physcadelic tunnels

Similar Questions

• Could not load the driver for Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface

  Hello

  Does anyone know how to fix this problem (Vista) Business

  Product
  Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface

  Problem
  Could not load driver software

  Description
  Windows was able to successfully install device driver software, but the driver has encountered a problem when he tried to run. The problem code is 10.

  Signature of the problem
  Problem event name: PnPDeviceProblemCode
  Architecture: x 86
  Hardware ID: * TUNMP
  Configure the class GUID: {4d36e972-e325-11ce-bfc1-08002be10318}
  The PnP problem code: 0000000-a
  Driver name: tunmp.sys
  Driver version: 6.0.6000.16386
  Driver date: 02/11/2006
  OS version: 6.0.6000.2.0.0.256.6
  Locale ID: 2057

  Additional information about the problem
  Bucket ID: 12121968

  Concerning
  Dave

  Hi Dave

  Can you please give us more information on your laptop and what is happening exactly?

• It supports audio tunneling?

  The nexus 6 does support audio of tunneling as the nexus 5?

  Tunneling audio is available on the Nexus 6.

• No Internet VPN IPsec Tunnel access

  I use the Netgear VPN - Pro 5.51.001 client to configure and run a VPN Tunnel to a UTM10 (3.5.2 - 14). It works very well so far and my private network resources could be achieved.

  When the tunnel is established, the client (W7 x 64) loses connectivity to the Internet on LAN or WLAN port desired and expected.
  Now, the Internet connection must be provided inside my private behind the UTM network.
  Due to a DNS SERVER running on my private network addresses (even on the internet) are correctly resolved (use NSLOOKUP to check), but cannot be routed to my VPN client.
  I found, that the map virtual Green-bow had no entry for the gateway, but the entry door (my UTM10) could be ping from the VPN client.
  After you enter the internal IP address of the UTM in the field of "Redundant GW" of the client software and restart and reconnect to the customer,
  the entry door is now displayed in the properties of Green-bow (ipconfig on CMD-screen), but still no internet site can be reached.

  To test, I have disabled the firewall on my client PC.
  The tunnel use mode-config and receives the entries in DNS and WINS server according to the config folder. The client is configured to force the NAT-traversal.

  Customers should be able to connect from the offices at home (or mobile) to the network/domain of society and use internet as if they were connected locally.
  SSL - VPN is not an option.

  m.Vogel wrote:
  Now, the Internet connection must be provided inside my private behind the UTM network.

  No, it doesn't work like that. If you want to "full-tunnel" support you need to stick with SSL VPN and select this option in the settings.

• SSL Tunneling Application outgoing failure

  Outgoing SSL Tunneling Application error

  Hello dear colleagues,
  I have UTM5 with the latest firmware. The unit works fine now with 3 VLANS / subnets, routing inter - VLAN, SSL VPN configuration, etc. I have an interesting question, but probably one of these questions to someone else experienced and solved (I hope).

  Medical practice I have set this up for actually needs of outgoing VPN tunnel/SSL. I encouraged the VPN on UTM protocols so the initial remote OUTGOING connection goes off flawlessly and allows users to authenticate. My question is when we try to show the remote Citrix server/published apps page. I get an error "request the Tunneling SSL - Failed to connect to server" . I know that the issue must be understood with the ProSecure UTM because I've temporarily removed the UTM equation and put in a D-Link DIR - 655 and Citrix published apps portal page launches very well. I am able to launch a published application and function normally. I pass on the D-Link with the Prosecure and I get the same question.

  I really don't understand what prevents to launch published applications page.

  I'd be more than happy to provide more information that I need to solve this problem.

  Not that it is important, but all endpoint devices are XPSP3/IE8. Yet once, shouldn't matter that customers can bring to the top of the published page no problem when the D-Link is used.

  Thank you
  MED

  ADIT, I've really hemmed and best enemy cela and managed to get a solution in place. Curious, if you have an idea on the terminal services question license I have known which I'll explain a little.

  So, I have disabled HTTPS scanning as you said and it helped the citrix portal page to come; However, the user received an error of connection application failure when they launched an app on the page. The error said that there are not enough licenses available Terminal Server. I am as there is no way in hell that all licenses are in use.

  So I completely disconnected from the remote network via SSL - VPN and not connected from my home network this site remote to see if I would have the same result and no problems to launch the applications of the portal page... basically no problem license Terminal Server services. I tried connecting from the prosecure and received the same error message.

  I wanted to keep HTTPS enabled analysis despite connect it secure by nature implemented with 443, so I spotted around based on your advice and added 4 remote domains to exclusions scan tab (my eyes completely spent during this 1st 10 x (very annoying). I tested the outgoing connection and it helped me successfully citrix portal page, but applications would not launch successfully. I received once again the same error of license to the Terminal Server services, but we expected it because it didn't start with the scanning to disabled .

  so I connected to the remote network and thought that I would allow my client to its remote desktop RDP access. I have configured RDP on his computer to Office XP and the connected failed. I thought at this stage that he had something to do with trying to RDP through the Microsoft UAG gateway used by the remote site. Rather than trying to work through sets of rules with the specialist support network out there, we decided to allow my client to run an IP network connector dry which was all ready helped the UAG. This enabled him successfully to RDP to his remote desktop and run any distance needed applications on the remote network.

  So, it's not what I really wanted to do. I really want to start individual applications of the closed Citrix portal page, but why this issue licenses arose himself the Terminal Server services is a mystery to me. The specialist in support of the remote side has been also blocked down there. He informed me that he has other clients that connect out through boxes of CISCO ASA and they have any problems launches applications of the portal page. If they scan you 80/443 traffic is not relevant because I disabled it completely on the UTM and it did not help.

  So any thoughts on that would be great and I once again thank you for your expertise.

• Through tunnels of automatic indexation to write data files?

  Hello

  I use neither-controller to control a servo and position and torque data collection. I want to write data to the TDMS files.

  Recently, I learned about the design of producer/consumer model and I thought it would be a good approach to ensure that writing the files didn't slow down my timed loop of data collection.

  However, I also realized that my program seems to work well if I wire the data that I collect the tunnels of automatic indexation. Can I use a structure that executes only after the entire collection of data is made to write the charts that I built to TDMS files.

  Is there a reason that would make the last method against? Can the tunnels of idexing auto slow my loop enough to concern him? I collect only about 5,000 points of data for each channel.

  See you soon,.

  Kenny

  In my opinion, the main consideration is timing.  If you use consumers/producers, you essentially make writing while the data collection process is "pending" the next item to collect.  It should be the case that the consumption will be faster than production, so at any time, 99% of the data are already written, Yes (perhish forbid!) if the program crashes, you already have most of the data on the disk. fo

  Alternatively, you can use the tunnels and send an array of 5000 points (from the tunnel exit) for the writing process.  This requires it to be rather than parallel series - no writing occurs until all the 5000 points are generated, and the writing process, instead of is almost as soon as it starts, takes 5000 times longer (more or less).

  The series is 'simpler', especially for a beginner.  The producer/consumer, if you understand the design model, would be my preference.

  BS

• alternative to the option conditional tunnel (for LV 2011)

  Hello

  I created a VI in 2013 LV that uses a conditional tunnel in a loop for.

  Unfortunately the PC I did the VI for running LV 2011, where the conditional tunnel option is not yet implemented.

  so so, I build a work around:

  

  with this workaround it takes much longer until the loop ends over the solution of the condtional tunnel.

  an idea to work around the problem better/more fast?

  I strongly suggest you to install the add-on OpenG your LabVIEW and the use of the Tunnel VI of conditional automatic indexing they provide in their palette. This has been implemented before LabVIEW added functionality and he worked many years.

  It works essentially incrementing through indices real values in an array of Booleans and out the corresponding indices in the input array.

  Edit: What you're doing are almost exactly what the code gets converted to when you register for the previous version as Aputman said. The only drawback to this is that you cannot use the parallelism because of the shift register. If you try to process a lot of data, run the loop with all the clues to get out (with parallelism) and post-process the array using the add-on OpenG.

• Tunnel of automatic indexing problem

  I have a data acquisition program that uses an Auto-Indexed Tunnel in a loop to process and display data in a table 1 d.  The program behaves strangely with the first value in the array (the point where the program worked, in a few seconds).  13 other values in the table all correct update, but the value of time always shows approximately the same number.  The loop is scheduled to update the front values once per second.  If I use a table outside of the loop Index block For to get the value of time out of the matrix, I get the correct value for time increments upward by about a second each time that the loop runs.

  So basically, when the value of time is passed through the auto-index Tunnel, its output fluctuates up and down a few tenths of seconds each time the loop is executed (remaining to a single value... usually about 90, even if it changes each time I run), instead of starting with 0 and increases with time as the summer running program.

  I'm under LabVIEW 8.5.1

  Thank you

  Sam

  Because I have no data acquisition installed, I can not tell what is the size of the array is, but if it is greater than 14, the later elements overwrite time because 0 is also the default value. For safety, I add another case (empty) (e.g. - 1) and make it the default.

  A lot of things very unwise, for example in the dataHCC.vi 'calculate', you add an empty array in the table. This really does not something useful, right?

• TEREDO TUNNELING PSEUDO-INTERFACE DEVICE DOES NOT WORK CORRECTLY - ACCORDING TO AVG PC TUNE UP

  My laptop is a HP G7030EA - MS Windows Vista Home Basic 32-bit SP2 Intel Pentium Dual CPU T2330 @ 1.60 GHz, 1.0 GB RAM, Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family, bought new in February 2008.  I have not changed any hardware, software, etc.  I do not use it for games, only for things such as e-mails and visit websites

  Until last month when my desktop computer broke, I used the laptop only occasionally as a backup of the computer.  It never quite worked and seems to be unable to handle several tasks at once, often taking minutes for Google to load.  When I get impatient and click the mouse too much I heard a horrible noise and the screen mouse cursor freeze for a minute or two.

  As the laptop has become my main computer at the moment, I downloaded AVG PC Tune Up to see if it would improve it performance has not helped.  I was surprised to see how much memory the AVG2013 anti virus program uses, but wonder if the speed of connection and freezing problems I experience result (AVG Tune Up conclusions on) the Teredo Tunneling pseudo-interface unit does not properly.

  I follow AVG on screen re boards: looking for a software driver update but none was found, and I got the message "the best driver for your device software is already installed.  Windows has determined that the driver software for your device is up-to-date, Tun Miniport, Microsoft Map.

  This left me confused.  If there is a problem with this device, no solution seems to exist.

  Any help that will allow my laptop to function normally is welcome.

  I understand that you want to know if the teredo adapter can cause performance problems.

  The teredo adapter should not cause performance problems.  It is really just used to allow devices work IPv4 with IPv6 Internet service provider.  If the ISP was using IPv6 and your system did not have the adapter teredo, so it wouldn't work properly with the service provider.  For now, IPv6 is a significant minority that the world continues to work on IPv4 as not all networks, Internet service providers, and businesses are not entirely passed to IPv6.

  This thread on the Microsoft forums goes into a little more detail about the adapter teredo including how to disable it so that you only see it in Device Manager.  Unless you are using IPv6, this shouldn't really be a problem.

  If you start in safe mode, the performance problem persists?  Turn on the computer and press F8 once per second for the Mode option, safe mode with networking.  This will help you to further isolate the performance problem.

  Furthermore, does this happen that the adapter is connected or not?

• Problem with the HP 430 (bluetooth and teredo tunneling Pseudo-Interface) drivers

  Hello

  recently my bluetooth function cannot to connect to other devices... This is what happens to the Device Manager:

  

  What is teredo tunneling pseudo-interface is for? is it important?
  If so, how to solve this problem?
  How to solve the problem of the bluetooth?

  Generic Bluetooth adapter:
  USB\VID_03F0 & PID_311D & REV_0001
  USB\VID_03F0 & PID_311D

  Teredo tunneling pseudo-Interface:

  * TEREDO

  Go to Device Manager, right click on the device and select Update driver. Path to the .inf file that you downloaded for use.

• May not know what is the error in my car wash tunnels

  I did a vi to the practice of the CLD of car wash sample question. And labview wrote there a missing assignment in each of my 10 tunnels. But I checked, there is an array of enum enter each of the 10 tunnels. Whence the error?

  I can't understand! My tunnels look exactly like that of the attached sample CLD answer.

  

  Hello

  Just move this Enum tunnel upward, you specify in the RED arrow. You can find a tunnel unwired. Just delete that. It's since overlap, you are not able to see.

  She's. All your error will disappear.

• Register to offset or solid square tunnel and DAQ support

  Hello

  There is little doubt, but I want to clarify here.

  I have a Subvi and I use it in my main VI.  Subvi is written with state machines and have up to 6 different States. In one State, I have a comparison function that must value a value to a terminal for the purposes of comparison. This value is constant and I always change. Currently, I pass these values to the Subvi my main VI. Moreover, I do not use any kind of change to go through the tunnel square rather just solid. The Subvi is continuous on its States when it runs. My doubt is the value which I send VI is still exist at the Terminal comparison Subvi or better using shift registers. I have 6 situations even like that.

  In addition, by using the DAQ Assistant is really forbidden due to bad results. May be, OR use them to show the clients easy programming. I have a finite acquisition loop for 12 times. Too long, I don't have any problem with the help of data acquisition. But I got a problem when it is in continuous mode (especially when my mode of Highlighted code execution). I changed it to finished now. Is it possible to keep to herself as write like that for an application usable 10 years or better write with DAQmx functions.

  Thank you people.

  shjukheter wrote:

  I have to wait until the 1VI running and I need to pass the output to 2Vi.

  None of the screw that you set call 1. VI or 2.vi. If 2. VI requires a power of 1(vi), it will automatically wait up to 1. VI ended until he could start. It is dependent on the data. No required sequence.

  DBL values will be read without having changed the tunnel entrance of the while loop and then go to the tunnel entrance to the structure of the case. The value of the tunnel will not change for the duration of the subVIs. You only need a registry change if one instance changes the value and you want the changed value in the subsequence of the while loop iterations.

• Understanding tunnels

  I thought I knew the tunnels, but it turns out that I don't have.

  Look at thise 2 small programs for the elapsed time. In the first case the timer counts up to 5 and wait for 1000 seconds and turn the timer running. In the second case the timer count up to 5 sec and not wait but instantly restarts the timer. Why wait have no effect in the second oppose?

  

  It is a matter of DATA FLOW.  In your first set of code, the ms of waiting cannot start until the inner loop is completed.  In the second, the ms of waiting does not to wait and runs in parallel with the inner loop.

• Creating a tunnel with LV scripts programmatically

  Hello world!

  I'm really stupid question, but lost 3 hours trying to solve it...

  So far, I went through the tutorials on VI scripts available on the Web site of NOR.

  Currently, I am trying to build this VI programmatically:

  

  I had no problem to create the controls, the add function, the selector of business wire etc. My problem is with the tunnels: how to create them?

  I don't have no idea on what to give to the node 'style' of the 'New VI object' VI. The enum constant has too many a choice to try all the...

  In addition, none of the official example uses a tunnel on a structure (in particular the example 'Working with Structure.lvproj' which is really poor IMO :/))

  OK, I know that there is no official support for the scripts of VI, but I thank you in advance for answering my question!

  Bat.

  The tunnels are very easy or very difficult, depending on how you are what the end result looks like.

  Easy way

  Wire between the two terminals using wire to connectTerminal method.  The tunnel connects automatically for you.

  I want where I want!

  To put the tunnel where you want, you must make sure that the wire goes where you want that he (moving later, the tunnel is much harder).  Thus, for each location where you want a metal elbow, drop something off with a terminal (for example a bundler).  Make sure that the center of the terminal you will thread is where you want your elbow.  Wire between all terminals on all objects, and then delete the temporary objects.  The internal engine of codegen LabVIEW for this.

  Let us know if you need more information.

• For loop tunnel exit "Last value" output of default values

  Salvation OR community,

  Today, I came across a probem of LabVIEW stange. A tunnel of release of "Last value" to a for loop back the default values instead of the last real value. The code is below:

  

  Below as screenshots of probes 44 and 45.

  

  

  When the probe 44 contains al the data (all the planks are present (and the correct "Testrack Module" is used)) probe 45 is empty.

  I already tried to remove the complete thread and it rewire. The result was the same.

  However, I also tried to use registers with shift instead of the tunnels and the code works now (see below for the code).

  

  The used version of Labview is 2013 SP1.

  I hope you can help,

  Tim

  Edit: If the images are too small, you can drag it to a new tab, and they become the original size.

  Tim,

  My first assumption: the because the loop never executes as you pass an empty array to an entry of automatic indexation.

  Another option, which is difficult to see in the screenshot: are there two entries of tunnels over the probe nr 42?

  Norbert