PIX 515E - failed upgrade to ver 6.35-721-9
PIX515E with 128 MB of RAM and 16MB Flash
I just tried to improve my Pix515E of 6.35 to 7.21 - 9 in monitor mode. I am able to connect to the tftp server and upload the new image, once the download is finished my leaf through pix just re-boot and then not be able to find a valid image in flash.
In an effort to fix this problem, I have tried since downloading worm 7.01 I read in a post that you should spend to 7.01 before going to subsequent revisions to ver 7. It downloads also successfully and starts then to scroll the new config my pix, until it reaches the line of configuration to the tftp server, then timesout and restarts.
Have no clue? Any suggestions are welcome.
Thank you
I made this exactly the same there - from 6.3 to 7.2 about 2 weeks - this does not work if you do directly, and I found myself in with a completely erased flash memory monitor mode. fun. However, I can certainly you that from this State, if you load the version 7.0.5 TFTP image (in watch mode), it will work. Have you read the article in http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_70/pix_upgd/pixupgrd.htm#wp1752751 do the fashion upgrade monitor? Probably yes... I think the version 7.0.x knows how to do some special things for the PIX boot loader that change to be compatible 6.x to 7.x compatible, that is why, you can't go directly to 7.1.x and 7.2.x 6.3. I wasn't originally planning to do the update mode monitor but my plans changed when erased flash 7.2, then could not load into flash. ;)
So, you mentioned that when he reached the line of configuration to the tftp server, it expires and restarts... What is the command in your config? You load the config from TFTP during startup or something like that?
Tags: Cisco Security
Similar Questions
-
PIX-515E-R-BUN MEM upgrade with PIX-515-MEM-32
Hi all
is it maybe possible to upgrade the PIX 515E - r
with this release of PIX-515-MEM-32, without having to pay
for all PIX-525-SW-R-UR = update license.
Concerning
Richard
The PIX will recognize this new memory but the configuration is not supported. The upgrade of UR's memory, but also an update of license for several interfaces, failover, etc... Unless you want to add these features to your PIX, it is not necessary to upgrade memory. 32 MB is more than enough for a PIX 515R.
Does that help?
Scott
-
I have a pair of PIX 515E (6.3) running in failover mode. They are currently connected to a single chassis base. We are upgrading our network with the heart, dual 6500's. Is there a way to connect each PIX to a separate kernel (1 PIX - Core1, PIX 2 - Core2) to allow a failure of the base?
Core 1 and Core 2 will have a L2 link between them. If the current active PIX is connected to Core1 and Core 1 dies, this would not lead to support PIX failover. All LAN traffic would go through Core 2, but since he does not have an active path to the active PIX 1, traffic would drop. My reasoning is correct?
Is there a way to connect the PIX to two cores running V6.3?
Hello
If you use the cable-based failover, you can change the basis of LAN failover.
Read http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/pix/pix63/configuration/guide/failover.html#wp1024836
I hope this helps.
Best regards.
Massimiliano.
-
Cisco VPN Client behind PIX 515E,->; VPN concentrator
I'm trying to configure a client as follows:
The user is running Cisco VPN Client 4.0. They are behind a 6.1 PIX 515E (4), and I need to connect to a VPN concentrator located outside of our network. We use PAT for address translation. As far as I know, to allow ipsec through Firewall 1 tunnel, I need to upgrade the pix to 6.3 and activate "fixup protocol esp-ike.
Is there another way to do this? I am also curious to know how much more easy/better this will work if we were dealing with pptp.
You don't necessarily need to fixup protocol esp-ike active. The remote Hub there encapsulation NAT - T enabled so that clients behind the NAT can run?
-
Hello
I have pix 515E and I configured a VPN on it. My users connect to my network from the internet via the Cisco VPN client.
I have problem, only their LAN machine can do VPN from Cisco VPN client to my network at once.
Users are connected to the internet via an ADSL router and the LAN switch.
--------------------------------------------------
PIX Config:
6.3 (4) version PIX
interface ethernet0 car
Auto interface ethernet1
ethernet0 nameif outside security0
nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
enable encrypted password xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx encrypted passwd
hostname ABCDEFGH
ABCD.com domain name
clock timezone IS - 5
clock to summer time EDT recurring
fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512
fixup protocol ftp 21
fixup protocol h323 h225 1720
fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719
fixup protocol http 80
fixup protocol rsh 514
fixup protocol rtsp 554
fixup protocol sip 5060
fixup protocol sip udp 5060
fixup protocol 2000 skinny
fixup protocol smtp 25
fixup protocol sqlnet 1521
fixup protocol tftp 69
inside_out to the list of allowed access nat0_acl ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
list of allowed shared access ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
pager lines 24
Outside 1500 MTU
Within 1500 MTU
IP address outside xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.0
IP address inside 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
alarm action IP verification of information
alarm action attack IP audit
IP local pool vpnpool 192.168.2.1 - 192.168.2.254
PDM logging 100 information
history of PDM activate
ARP timeout 14400
Global interface 10 (external)
NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_out-nat0_acl
NAT (inside) 10 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 0
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 1
Timeout xlate 03:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225
H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute
GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server
AAA-server GANYMEDE + 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-server GANYMEDE + deadtime 10
RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server
AAA-server RADIUS 3 max-failed-attempts
AAA-RADIUS deadtime 10 Server
AAA-server RADIUS (inside) host ABCDE timeout 10
AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol
RADIUS protocol radius AAA-server
Radius max-failed-attempts 3 AAA-server
AAA-radius deadtime 10 Server
RADIUS protocol AAA-server partnerauth
AAA-server partnerauth max-failed-attempts 3
AAA-server deadtime 10 partnerauth
partnerauth AAA-server (host ABCDEFG myvpn1 timeout 10 Interior)
Enable http server
http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
No snmp server location
No snmp Server contact
SNMP-Server Community public
No trap to activate snmp Server
enable floodguard
Permitted connection ipsec sysopt
Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5-esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
Crypto-map dynamic outside_dyn_map 20 the transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 value
map outside_map 65535-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic outside_dyn_map
card crypto client outside_map of authentication partnerauth
outside_map interface card crypto outside
ISAKMP allows outside
ISAKMP key * address 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0
ISAKMP identity address
part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 8
ISAKMP strategy 8 3des encryption
ISAKMP strategy 8 md5 hash
8 2 ISAKMP policy group
ISAKMP life duration strategy 8 the 86400
part of pre authentication ISAKMP policy 10
ISAKMP policy 10 3des encryption
ISAKMP policy 10 sha hash
10 2 ISAKMP policy group
ISAKMP life duration strategy 10 86400
vpngroup myvpn address vpnpool pool
vpngroup myvpn ABCDE dns server
vpngroup myvpn by default-field ABCD.com
splitting myvpn vpngroup split tunnel
vpngroup idle 1800 myvpn-time
vpngroup myvpn password *.
Telnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
Telnet timeout 5
SSH timeout 5
Console timeout 0
dhcpd address 192.168.1.200 - 192.168.1.254 inside
dhcpd dns ABCDE
dhcpd lease 3600
dhcpd ping_timeout 750
field of dhcpd ABCD.com
dhcpd outside auto_config
dhcpd allow inside
Terminal width 80
--------------------------------------------------
Thanks in advance.
-Amit
Try to add the "isakmp nat-traversal" command to your PIX. I suspect what happens is that Remote LAN users is translated to a single IP address as they pass through the DSL connection. I also assume that the machine doing the translation has a capacity of IPSec passthrough. Linksys routers would be a good example of this type of NAT device that allows IPSec pull-out.
If that's the case, that a single VPN connection will be able to operate both. The above command will turn PIX detect clients that are located behind a NAT device, and then try to configure the VPN sessions in UDP packets and so to work around the limitation of NAT and IPSec passthrough device.
-
Using PIX 515E configuration require
Dear all,
Hi.Actually I need help for PIX 515E.Pls. check out the scenario, design & suggest?
Pls. find the details following and configuration of VLAN attached router.
# I want to put as
«Spend my LAN on CISCO 2900 (range 172.16.29.X IP...» (25 PCs) - VLAN router - CISCO PIX - ISP public IP.
# Now it's
"My LAN on CISCO 2900 - VLAN (external) router - ISP.
Details of router & PIX:
#Router inside the IP - 172.16.29.1 (inside property intellectual as it is very critical that cannot be changed)
Outdoor #Router ip - what ip should I use? (I tried with 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0)
#PIX outside intellectual property - what ip should I use? (My ISP IP?-j' tried with 208.144.230.197 which is currently outside of my router)
#PIX within the intellectual property - what ip should I use? (I tried with 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0)
Connection ISP #My is directly from the ISP GW to an ethernet cat 5 on my router VLAN
#I would allow www, FTP, web-based like Yahoomail... etc... & Messenger services
VLAN router Config:
Current configuration: 1028 bytes
!
version 12.3
horodateurs service debug datetime msec
Log service timestamps datetime msec
no password encryption service
!
hostname VLANRouter
!
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
!
activate the gcsroot password
!
No aaa new-model
IP subnet zero
!
!
no record of conflict ip dhcp
DHCP excluded-address IP 172.16.29.1 172.16.29.240
DHCP excluded-address IP 172.16.29.250 172.16.29.254
!
IP dhcp pool dhcppool
network 172.16.29.0 255.255.255.0
DNS-server 208.144.230.1 208.144.230.2
router by default - 172.16.29.1
!
!
!
!
controller E1 0/0
!
controller E1 0/1
!
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
IP 208.144.230.197 255.255.255.224
NAT outside IP
automatic duplex
automatic speed
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
IP 172.16.29.1 255.255.255.0
IP nat inside
automatic duplex
automatic speed
!
IP nat inside source list 7 interface FastEthernet0/0 overload
IP http server
IP classless
IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 208.144.230.200
!
!
access-list 7 permit 172.16.29.0 0.0.0.255
!
Line con 0
line to 0
line vty 0 4
opening of session
!
!
!
end
All advice is appreciated.
Kind regards
Hiren s Mehta.
ORG Informatics Ltd.
Bamako, MALI
AFRICA
Hi hiren,.
See the answers below:
#Router inside the IP - 172.16.29.1 (inside property intellectual as it is very critical that cannot be changed)
When you upgrade the PIX router inbetween and your switch, you must put the PIX inside IP like 172.16.29.1 and change the router within the subnet to someother pool. Do the PAT on the PIX, rather than the router.
Outdoor #Router ip - what ip should I use? (I tried with 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0)
Router outside the property intellectual property will be that given by the ISP... The ISP would have given a public IP address for the WAN link. This cannot be changed.
#PIX outside intellectual property - what ip should I use? (My ISP IP?-j' tried with 208.144.230.197 which is currently outside of my router)
PIX outside IP must be comprehensive. ISP would have given you a LAN subnet. Use it. In this case, inside the interface of the router has an IP address from that subnet even...
#PIX within the intellectual property - what ip should I use? (I tried with 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0)
PIX inside must be 172.16.29.1, which will be the default gateway for all PCs. If you change this subnet, then the PC should have an IP address on the same subnet that has decided.
Connection ISP #My is directly from the ISP GW to an ethernet cat 5 on my router VLAN
didn't get it... is that on the internet router or switch?
#I would allow www, FTP, web-based like Yahoomail... etc... & Messenger services
If all these must be permitted from inside to outside, you have not open anything... by default, all traffic to the inside outside is allowed (except if you put a list of access denied)...
-
problems after Pix 515e of 6.34 to 7.12
Recently upgrade a PIX 515e of 6.34 to 7.12. Everything seemed to work well, but having a problem of access to certain web sites. Basically, allow us all IP from the "inside" network traffic Log errors are:
609001: built outide:199.230.128.100 local-home
106015: TCP (no relation) to deny djm/1646 199.230.128.100/80 flags ACK on the interface inside
609002: dismantling of the local-host ouside: 199.230.128.100 duration 0:00:00
Config is attached...
We also find that the problems on the same platform. Have removed the inspection of HTTP the default control as a temporary workaround rule:
Policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
don't inspect http
Still looking for a solution...
-
I got some new PIX 515E security infra-red and I had sex 2 questions about everything I tried. I installed a 5 port switch inside and cannot ping anything from the console. I have a computer on the switch, and he is able to ping other devices on the switch, but not the PIX.
What I find strange is that when I try to ping from the inside interface on the PIX of one inside computers, PIX displays the MAC address of the computer inside in the arp table.
My goal is to upgrade the PIX to ver7.0 but I can't do so until I can solve this problem.
Here are some information among the PIX.
#sh worm
Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3 (4)
Cisco PIX Device Manager Version 3.0 (2)
Updated Saturday 2 July 04 00:07 by Manu
pixfirewall up to 29 minutes 33 seconds
Material: PIX-515E, 128 MB RAM, Pentium II 433 MHz processor
Flash E28F128J3 @ 0 x 300, 16 MB
BIOS Flash AM29F400B @ 0xfffd8000, 32 KB
Hardware encryption device: VAC + (Crypto5823 revision 0 x 1)
0: ethernet0: the address is 0015.625a.f7da, irq 10
1: ethernet1: the address is 0015.625a.f7db, irq 11
2: ethernet2: the address is 000d.8810.902c, irq 11
3: ethernet3: the address is 000d.8810.902d, irq 10
4: ethernet4: the address is 000d.8810.902e, irq 9
5: ethernet5: the address is 000d.8810.902f, irq 5
Features licensed:
Failover: enabled
VPN - A: enabled
VPN-3DES-AES: disabled
The maximum physical Interfaces: 6
Maximum Interfaces: 10
Cut - through Proxy: enabled
Guardians: enabled
URL filtering: enabled
Internal hosts: unlimited
Throughput: unlimited
Peer IKE: unlimited
This PIX has a failover license only (FO).
#sh run
interface ethernet1 100full
nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
pixfirewall hostname
domain testlan
access-list acl_out permit icmp any one
No external ip address
IP address inside 192.168.1.222 255.255.255.0
No IP failover outdoors
No IP failover inside
#sh int e1
interface ethernet1 'inside' is up, line protocol is up
The material is i82559 ethernet, the address is 0015.625a.f7db
IP 192.168.1.222, subnet mask 255.255.255.0
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit full duplex
Hi M8,
Your firewall has a license of FO, you must enable this device to be able to see it.
Run the command:
active failover
With this command, the device turns into the 'Active' from a perspective of failover state. It will work after that.
See you soon.
Salem.
-
UAL IP on a PIX 515E with 6.2 (2)
Sorry, I have not found this in a search. I need to understand how to connect what specific host IPs access only. I have a 6.2 (2) running of PIX 515E and no other devices to use for this - no router, etc., nor lead us auth servers. I have used the parameter "log" on router ACL several times but do not see that in this version of PIX. Thanks in advance.
Hi Brian,.
The feature of logging for PIX ACL not brought up to version 6.3. The following link has some info on it:
http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/iaabu/PIX/pix_sw/v_63/63rnotes/pixrn63.htm#wp68356
I'm afraid you will have to upgrade to get this functionality.
Hope that help - rate pls post if it does.
Paresh
-
I am a new user and I'm trying to configure a PIX 515e Ver 6.3 (3). How can I give my users inside access to my webfarm located on dmz1. I am able to access the test sites inside and outside dzm1. I can't access the Web inside dmz1 sites. Here is my current config:
6.3 (3) version PIX
interface ethernet0 100full
interface ethernet1 100full
interface ethernet2 100full
Automatic stop of interface ethernet3
Automatic stop of interface ethernet4
Automatic stop of interface ethernet5
ethernet0 nameif outside security0
nameif ethernet1 inside the security100
nameif ethernet2 dmz1 security50
nameif ethernet3 intf3 securite6
nameif ethernet4 intf4 security8
ethernet5 intf5 security10 nameif
enable password xxxx
passwd xxxx
hostname pix1
apprendrefacile.com domain name
fixup protocol dns-length maximum 512
fixup protocol ftp 21
fixup protocol h323 h225 1720
fixup protocol h323 ras 1718-1719
fixup protocol http 80
fixup protocol rsh 514
fixup protocol rtsp 554
fixup protocol sip 5060
fixup protocol sip udp 5060
fixup protocol 2000 skinny
fixup protocol smtp 25
fixup protocol sqlnet 1521
fixup protocol tftp 69
names of
aetest name 10.10.10.1
name 10.10.10.2 aetest1
name 13.13.13.3 aetestdmz
name 13.13.13.4 aetestdmz1
access-list from-out-to allow tcp any any eq www
pager lines 24
opening of session
debug logging in buffered memory
Outside 1500 MTU
Within 1500 MTU
dmz1 MTU 1500
intf3 MTU 1500
intf4 MTU 1500
intf5 MTU 1500
IP address outside the 12.x.x.x.255.255.0
IP address inside 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
IP address dmz1 13.x.x.x.255.255.0
No intf3 ip address
No intf4 ip address
No intf5 ip address
alarm action IP verification of information
alarm action attack IP audit
no failover
failover timeout 0:00:00
failover poll 15
No IP failover outdoors
No IP failover inside
no failover ip address dmz1
no failover ip address intf3
no failover ip address intf4
no failover ip address intf5
history of PDM activate
ARP timeout 14400
public static 12.12.12.15 (inside, outside) aetest netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
public static 12.12.12.16 (inside, outside) aetest1 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
(dmz1, external) 12.12.12.17 static aetestdmz netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
(dmz1, external) 12.12.12.18 static aetestdmz1 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
Access-group from-out-to external interface
Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 12.12.12.1 1
Timeout xlate 03:00
Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0: CPP 02:00 0:10:00 01:00 h225
H323 timeout 0:05:00 mgcp 0: sip from 05:00 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
Timeout, uauth 0:05:00 absolute
GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server
RADIUS Protocol RADIUS AAA server
AAA-server local LOCAL Protocol
Enable http server
http 10.10.10.207 255.255.255.255 inside
No snmp server location
No snmp Server contact
SNMP-Server Community public
No trap to activate snmp Server
enable floodguard
Telnet 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 inside
Telnet timeout 20
SSH timeout 5
Console timeout 0
Terminal width 80
Cryptochecksum:XXXXX
: end
Thank you... Jay
with pix v6.x, nat/global or static is a must do before the pix will start to transfer packets between two interfaces.
the current static instructions do not cover the translation between the inside and the dmz. as the traffic between pix inside the net and dmz is private, I suggest you to set up no. - nat between the two.
for example
static (inside, dmz1) 10.10.10.0 10.10.10.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
clear xlate
in the above example, pix inside the host must be able to access the dmz Server pointing to the private ip address of dmz Web server.
If you prefer the pix inside the host to access the dmz by name server, then "alias" command should be applied.
for example
alias (inside) 13.13.13.3 12.12.12.17 255.255.255.255
the need for the command "alias" is due to the fact that when pix inside the host tries to access the server dmz by name, the public dns will point to the public IP address of the dmz Web server. now, as the static electricity created for the dmz Web server is directional i.e. public ip will be accessible from the outside, not the pix inside the net. so the 'alias' command will allow the PIX to manipulate the dns response and point the name to the private ip of Web server dmz for the pix inside the host.
-
I have a problem of analysis since the upgrade to ver El Capitan 10.11.4
I have a Samsung M2070W printer/scanner which had no problem until I upgraded to Ver 10.11.4. Now the printer works well but when I scan a document or a picture, I get a message that has a layered 'YES' or he simply loses the scanner completely and I have a message that has a report was automatically sent to Apple.
When I get the area overlaid with 'YES' if I hit ESC sometimes allow me to save the scan.
I have no problem when using the printer.
Is that what the problem of ideas?
Go to the Samsung support website and download the latest driver for your specific device model. After installing the driver, you may need to set the new print and scan drivers as your default values.
-
4240 IPS blocking queries with Pix 515E
I have activated the lock on the 4240 and put locking as our Pix 515E. When I look at the Configurations of Signature quite a few Signature Actions are set to alert only produce. If blocking is enabled you also go and the Actions of signing the Deny value or TCP Reset? So far my attackers show dosen't IPS refused and he detected the high level of traffic which I assume must now be blocked. Thanks John
Yes, go under the signatures that you want and enable blocking for them as an action. Globally blocking configuration (setting the blocking device, the interface, the connection of the device information, etc.), does not actually blocked on the sensor itself, we must still go and activate the blocking of this particular signature. When this particular GIS fires in the future, the sensor it will block on the device that you configured.
Be very careful with blocking, the reason that we're not blocking simply all the signatures, it is that it would be very dangerous to blindly add access lists to a device that will stop traffic. You must first make sure that you don't get any number of false positives on the signatures and end up blocking valid traffic. In addition, on a busy sensor you could easily overrun detector and locking to writing and deleting 1000's of top access lists. And finally, although probably not, blocking can even be used as an attack denial of service, where an attacker, if they know what signatures you block, can usurp packages past your sensor so that it denies traffic to our legitimate guests.
You have to look at what signatures you really want to block, and then enable blocking on them individually.
-
Cisco VPN Client Authentication - PIX 515E-UR
Hi all
I need your expert help on the following issues I have:
1. I would like to create more than 1 client VPN on my PIX-515E groups. This is so that I can give a different part of the internal network access to different type of VPN connection. For example, I want a group to have no XAUTH, while the other group must use RADIUS XAUTH. Is it possible for me to do this? I see the PIX automatically enable RADIUS on both groups of VPN clients.
2. the RADIUS server is a Microsoft ISA with IAS server and it is located on the PIX inside interface. The VPN endpoint is external interface of the PIX. Is there a problem with this Setup? Do I need to have the RADIUS server that is located on the external interface?
3 can. what command I use to debug RADIUS authentication?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Hi vincent,.
(1) you can use the vpngroup *-authentication server ipaddress to specify the IP address of the Radius Server on a particular group... If you do not specify this, the authentication of the user is made locally... also check for vpngroup * order of user authentication
(2) there should be no problem with the installation of your... should work fine... If the RADIUS is outdoors, it is subject to many attacks... so have it inside...
(3) use the "RADIUS session debug" or "debug aaa authentication..."
I hope this helps... all the best... the rate of responses if found useful
REDA
-
Clearing its IPSec on a PIX 515E
Hello
Is it possible to delete a particular IPSec security association to a PIX 515E Version 6.3 (1)?
Concerning
Lisbeth
Clear [crypto] ipsec his destination-address spi protocol entry
is what you are looking for.
-
Hello
7.0 (1) version pix
ASDM version 5.0 (1)
I have a situation where you go paas-thanks to the VPN feature goes on our PIX 515E. I tried to put this on the pix using a VPN Wizard Site to site
who is enabled. I was unable to connect to the pix from the remote site. Witch's journal replied negotiate the pix is OK and the success
The problem is when I try to set up the tunnel to the top of the remote site. I fall without failure.
where can I see the vpn pix for error log?
is there a manual for the solution of site to site VPN using the wizard
Help, please.
Thanks in advance
the section 'use adsm' (step 14) gives an example on how to set up vpn lan - lan via adsm
Newspaper to go to the section "check".
Maybe you are looking for
-
no backup iPhone on iCloud contacts
All the details of my iPhone do not appear in iCloud. I'm afraid to activate the new phone until I can see all the details.
-
My L50 Satellite has just been stolen
My 1 month l50 was stolen just in my way of locating any car? Secure password isn't enough or can it be just rebooted?
-
Cannot load Windows 10 in Bootcamp
I'm following the directions of Apple install Windows 10 (1st time install, not an update) on my end 2015 iMac, retina 5 k (with disc Fusion) and he could not get past the stage of "format" in the part of the bootcamp partition Windows Installer. Acc
-
I'm trying to recover my old Xbox gamer tag spinout85, I do not remember the address or the password and I spent an hour on the phone with xbox to find that they could not help me. I need to know the e-mail address attatched to this tag and put it b
-
No hard drive found during the installation of the OS
OK so I bought this used computer and I will install win 7 64 when it comes to the screen that shows the location of windows installation, nothing indicating no hd inside says no drives found. Click on load a driver to provide a driver for installing