Port in WLC2112 channel

Similar Questions

• Cisco 6500's inside the VSS Configuration. Port ID's channel

  Hello

  I have a pair of 6500's Setup with VSS and there is currently only one link between then. However, one end of the link is Po10 and the other end is on Po25.  If I move the Po10 Po25, things will break? It seems to work fine now. I am about to add a second link and I am concerned about the current configuration.  It makes more sense for me to have the two ends of the same binding on the same port channel ID.  I have seen documentation that States otherwise however.

  Interface Port-channel10

  No switchport

  no ip address

  pass the virtual link 1

  MLS qos trust cos

  no consistency mls qos channel

  !

  Interface Port-channel25

  No switchport

  no ip address

  pass the virtual link 2

  MLS qos trust cos

  no consistency mls qos channel

  DTC_6509s_VSS #sh run int Te1/5/4

  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 116 bytes

  !

  interface TenGigabitEthernet1/5/4

  No switchport

  no ip address

  MLS qos trust cos

  channel-group 10 mode on

  end

  DTC_6509s_VSS #sh run int Te2/5/4

  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 116 bytes

  !

  interface TenGigabitEthernet2/5/4

  No switchport

  no ip address

  MLS qos trust cos

  channel-group 25 mode on

  end

  DTC_6509s_VSS #.

  DTC_6509s_VSS #sh vslp lmp sum

  Example #1:

  Summary of the LMP

  Information about the link: configured: operational 1: 1

  Peer Peer Peer Peer timers running

  Interface Interface state flag MAC indicator switch (time remaining)

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  4/5/TE1 VSFP VSFP operational 0026.0a26.84c0 2 Te2/5/4 T4 (24ms)

  T5 (s 59.95)

  DTC_6509s_VSS #sh switch port-channel virtual link

  Flags: - Low P - D bundled in port-channel

  I have - autonomous s - suspended

  H Eve (LACP only)

  R - Layer 3 S - Layer2

  U - N running - is not in service, no aggregation

  f cannot allocate an aggregator

  M not in use, no aggregation due to minimum links has not met

  m don't use, port do not associate due to not meeting minimum links

  u - unfit to tied selling

  d default port

  w waiting to be aggregated

  Protocol for the Port-Channel port group

  ------+-------------+-----------+-------------------

  10 Po10 (RU) - Te1/5/4 (P)

  25 Po25 (RU) - Te2/5/4 (P)

  Hello

  It doesn't make a difference if you do both sides with the same channel id or not. The ID of the port channel is a logical interface that does not impact on the etherchannel between them at all. So, you can leave one side Po10 and other like Po25 without problem. Just make sure you have at least one member of the Portchannel Active physical interfaces for not losing your connection to VSS.

  Kind regards

  Mohamed

• Remove the port from the channel-group

  I met a strange problem with port aggregation, where I decided to remove a port of a port channel and put it in another, but in my SNMP tool, it still belongs to the old channel of port and the new at the same time.

  Port channel was created using:

  (config) #interface gigabitEthernet 0/1/22

  (config-if) trunk mode #switchport

  (config-if) active in mode #channel-group 1

  Then passes through

  (config) #interface gigabitEthernet 0/1/22

  (config-if) #no active mode channel-group 1
  (config-if) active in mode #channel-group 2

  I have also that when I pull up some information on configuring etherchannel.

  #show interfaces gigabitEthernet 0/1/22 etherchannel

  Port status Up Mstr Assoc in Bndl

  Group of channels = 2 Mode = active = Gcchange-

  Port channel = GC Po2 = - port-channel Pseudo = Po2

  Port index = 0 load = 0 x 00 Protocol = LACP

  Flags: S - device sends slow LACPDUs F - device sends Rapids LACPDUs.

  A - unit is in Active mode.        P - peripheral is in passive mode.

  Local information:

  LACP Admin Oper Port Port port

  Port flags State priority key number

  Item in gi1/0/22 SFT bndl 32768 0 x 2 0 x 2 0 x 117 0x3D

  Partner information:

  LACP Admin Oper Port Port port

  Key priority indicators Dev ID Age port key number status

  Item in gi1/0/22 SFT 32768 0817.35e4.2c80 26 s 0x0 0 x 2 0 x 118 0x3D

  Age of the port in the current state: 164d: 21 h: 32 m: 44s

  This could be a problem with my (observium) snmp tool or are there additional measures to eliminate a port of a group of channels? Reboot of the switch?

  System image file is "flash: c2960s-universalk9 - mz.150 - 2.SE4.bin.

  Hello

  I would say that it is related to the snmp tool, once you remove the port of the chain earlier and added to the new, which will be to the one, it is impossible that an interface will be less than 2 different port channels.

  Also there is no need to restart the switch or something like that, you can use the following commands to verify that the interface is now part of the new channel group:

  Show etherchannel summary

  Show interface execution item in gi1/0/22

  With these commands, you will see that the interface belongs to the Group channel 2, and the order that you set above shows that the interface belongs to po2.

  Hope this helps

• How better to configure ports of ether-channel for use with iSCSI?

  I had a quick glance and find a number of different discussions about the best solution for simlar scenarios but nothing quite close enough to convince me to implement the proposed solution.

  The configuration that I was left with is not ideal, because it is not redundent. So I need to find a quick solution pritty.

  Two cards (each NIC goes to different switch) - Console of Service

  Two network cards (both in the same key) - vMotion

  Two network cards (they both go to the same switch) - Prod (10 discussions)

  Two network cards (they both go to the same switch in an ether channel) - storage (iSCSI)

  The environment is a cluster of three ESXi 4.1 ENT U1 + environment, connected to a vCenter STD.

  Here's what I intend to allocate, but hoped a nice person enough to suggest the best configuration. I realize the number of connections to Prod is excessive and we will reach neaver as bandwidth, but I have free network cards.

  Two cards (each NIC goes to different switch) - Console of Service

  Two cards (each NIC goes to different switch) - vMotion

  Four NICs (two pairs in different switches) - Prod (10 discussions)

  Four (#) - storage (iSCSI) network interface cards

  The part that concerns me is get the configuration for storage network cards just like we use the ether-channel, which seems to complicate things from what I've read.

  So in summary I want to use four NICs for storage and bandwidth is not wasted I currenlty have using the channel of the ether. If I can work it another way without the use of ether-channel I am pleased to see again.

  If I have not provided enough information to evaluate, please let me know and I'll give you more.

  Thanks in advance for any helpful information.

  So in summary I want to use four NICs for storage and bandwidth is not wasted I currenlty have using the channel of the ether. If I can work it another way without the use of ether-channel I am pleased to see again.

  First of all, let me squash the myth an EtherChannel gives you additional bandwidth for iSCSI. Each iSCSI initiator can use an uplink to an iSCSI target vSphere being limited to a hash value "IP". Given that the source and destination IPs are always the same, the hash is always the same.

  I wrote about it here in my post seriously, Stop "Using Port channels for vSphere storage traffic":

  http://wahlnetwork.com/2013/03/05/stop-using-port-channels-to-vSphere-hosts/

  I recommend to use the vmkernel ports link. It is available in 4.1, but not through the GUI.

  http://pubs.VMware.com/vSphere-4-ESX-vCenter/topic/com.VMware.vSphere.config_iscsi.doc_40/esx_san_config/configuring_iscsi/t_connect_software_iscsi_initiators_to_iscsi_vmkernel_ports.html

• MDS configuration for port channel

  I tried to put in place the new download FC port channel to a pair of 9124 s MDS, but as I don't know enough on the side MDS, I can't the link to come. Are there references available anywhere say you blow by blow exactly how to set up the side MDS of the channel of the port? Or maybe an example of configuration work?

  Thank you

  I don't think it's possible to configure the fabric of interconnections, FC switch mode that only VAN is based on those. The only mode of switch that is taken in charge and possible to configure is the local network Ethernet switching mode.

  I have configured the week last on a pair of 9124 s MDS and needed to activate the F port trunking and channeling Protocol feature by using this command

  "feature fport-channel-trunk.

  After that, I had to run SAN Port Channeling. Here's a snipit of my configuration:

  npiv functionality
  fport-channel-trunk feature

  interface port-channel 11
  active channel mode
  rate switchport dedicated mode

  interface fc1/1
  port-license purchase
  Channel-Group 11
  no downtime

  interface fc1/2
  port-license purchase
  Channel-Group 11
  no downtime

• Uplink Ports Fibre Channel - UCS GUI Configuration Guide

  Hi all

  Could someone please explain which means that what follows in the Configuration of GUI of UCS guide @.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/unified_computing/UCS/SW/GUI/config/Guide/2.0/b_UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_0_chapter_0101.PDF

  Uplink Ports Fibre Channel

  Manage ports Uplink Fiber Channel FCoE traffic between the interconnection of fabric and the next layer of the

  SAN storage network. All FCoE network-related traffic is pinned to one of these ports.

  By default, the Fibre Channel ports are uplink. However, you can configure them to work as Fibre Channel

  storage ports. This is useful in cases where a Cisco UCS requires a connection to a DAS storage

  Device (DAS).

  My question is, how the FC Port could handle FCoE traffic? My understanding was that FCoE will be lifted and Enthernet connection only.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/unified_computing/UCS/SW/GUI/config/Guide/2.0/b_UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_0_chapter_0101.PDF

  Thanks for your help

  Concerning

  Vikas Srivastava

  The CF module interconnection fabric is the place where the speration of CF vs. FCoE happen, so it's where the FC frame is extracted in the Ethernet frame.

• Setting port channel between UCS - FI and MDS 9124 (Mode F)

  Dear team,

  We tried to create the channel of port between UCS FI and MDS 9124

  But the port channel do not take action in mode F on MDS 9124

  FI is in host FC end Mode

  We have allowed FC uplink on FI trunking

  We have activated NPIV on MDS

  We have activated the MDS trunk

  FI and MDS in default VSAN

  To check that we have changed the way FI FC channels mode and switch port became active, but in E mode

  When we enabled CF trunking of uplink on the port mode FI channels and FC Switching became active in mode TE

  but in both cases above, showflogi database shows WWPN of SAN alone does not have the any fi.

  How to achieve this?

  Have read that no need to change the mode switching mode of CF swicthing and keep FC Endhost way

  SO how to channel ports with mode F MDS and FI (Display Mode as NProxy)

  What is it has nothing to do with the MDS NX - OS version? (https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2179129)

  If yes how to put as license for ports came with the camera and we don't have any CAP/PAK or license file as she came

  with license

  Also, we saw 2 files available for download (m9100-s2ek9-kickstart - mz.5.2.8 .bin and m9100-s2ek9 - mz.5.2.8 .bin b b) to use

  Thanks and greetings

  Jose

  Hi Jo Bo.

  What version of the software if your MDS race?

  On your UCS do connect nxos and show ficelleStringString ficelleT inteface and find the mac address.

  It is possible that you could be hitting the bug below. If this is the case, you may need to update the firmware on your MDS.

  Add MAC YES '002a6a', '8c604f', '00defb' for 5 k/UCS-FI

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId= CSCty04686

  Symptom:

  Link change cannot connect any other Nexus or other Cisco Switch in mode VAN with a port channel F.   Question can be viewed in older versions of 5.1

  5.1.3.N1.1a

  but not later

  5.1.3.N2.1c

  Release. Question is also found in

  5.2 (1) N1 (1)

  and

  6.0 (2) N1 (1)

  and later versions.

  Conditions:

  Nexus configured for the link SAN PortChannels or NPIV Nexus mode connected to the UCS via regular F port channel where UCS VAN VAN edge mode switch: YES switch manufactured FI or another Cisco UCS Port WWN: xx:xx:00:2 has: 6a: xx:xx:xx or xx:xx:8 c: 60:4f:xx:xx:xx

  Workaround solution:

  Turn-off on Nexus 5 k TF-port question link mode does not happen with standard F-PORT SAN to remove Portchannel config

  Other Description of the problem:

  To check question collect please see the flogi-event history internal errors whenever the port is attempted OLS, AMENDMENTS, PBA counters will increment. This can be determined via the following output, view port internal info to see all the internal-historic port of error events

• port channels

  I'm looking on the port channels configured on the FI. And that's all. port channel 21 is (eth 1/27-20) which is connected to the nexus 7000

  so, what are the others?

  (nxos) # sh port-channel summary

  Flags: D - low P - Up in the port-channel (members)

  I - individual H - standby (LACP only)

  s suspended r - Module-removal

  S - Dial R - routed

  U - up (port-channel)

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Group-Type Port Protocol Ports members

  Channel

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  21 Po21 (SU) Eth LACP Eth1/17 (P) Eth1/18 (P) Eth1/19 (P)

  Eth1/20 (P)

  1286 Po1286 (SU) Eth NO Eth2/1/9 (P) Eth2/1/10 (P) Eth2/1/11 (P)

  Eth2/1/12 (P)

  1293 Po1293 (SU) Eth NO Eth1/1/9 (P) Eth1/1/10 (P) Eth1/1/11 (P)

  Eth1/1/12 (P)

  1298 Po1298 (SU) Eth NO Eth1/1/5 (P) Eth1/1/6 (P) Eth1/1/7 (P)

  Eth1/1/8 (P)

  1300 Po1300 (SU) Eth NO Eth2/1/5 (P) Eth2/1/6 (P) Eth2/1/7 (P)

  Eth2/1/8 (P)

  1306 Po1306 (SU) Eth NO Eth1/1/17 (P) Eth1/1/18 (P) Eth1/1/19 (P)

  Eth1/1/20 (P)

  1308 Po1308 (SU) Eth NO Eth2/1/17 (P) Eth2/1/18 (P) Eth2/1/19 (P)

  Eth2/1/20 (P)

  1311 Po1311 (SU) Eth NO Eth2/1/13 (P) Eth2-1-14 (P) Eth2/1/15 (P)

  Eth2/1/16 (P)

  1312 Po1312 (SU) Eth NO Eth1/1/13 (P) 1/Eth1/14 (P) 1/Eth1/15 (P)

  Eth1/1/16 (P)

  1315 Po1315 (SU) Eth NO Eth2/1/21 (P) Eth2/1/23 (P)

  1317 Po1317 (SU) Eth NO Eth1/1/21 (P) Eth1/1/23 (P)

  Tony,

  Port channels is those created implicitly by having the material of generation 2 (220 x, VIC 1240/80 and 62xx)

  These PC cannot be destroyed and cannot be seen through NXOS (UCSM-GUI will not display the)< thanks="" to="" my="" colleague="" jeff="">

  There is another discussion in this same forum this morning:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/message/4013409#4013409

  I hope this helps

  -Kenny

• A full Port-channel should be blocking?

  I had a topology.

  Everything has been properly configured, I veried all channels ports work on all switches... all hosts can talk to each other in their VLAN respective.

  I had trunks on all links between all switches.

  My show etherchannel summary indicates the Port Channel is GOOD if:

  SW1 #show etherchannel summary

  Flags: D - low P - port-channel

  I have - autonomous s - suspended

  H Eve (LACP only)

  R - Layer 3 S - Layer2

  U - running f - cannot allocate an aggregator

  u - unfit to tied selling

  w waiting to be aggregated

  d default port

  Number of channels in use: 2

  Number of aggregators: 2

  Protocol for the Port-Channel port group

  ------+-------------+-----------+----------------------------------------------

  1 Po1 (SU) LACP Gig0/1 (P) Gig0/2 (P)

  However, you will notice that the two ports Gigabit (1 channel Port on this switch) are ORANGE... which means BLOCKED... .and this has been verified when I ran see the spanning tree on this switch

  If it's supposed to happen?

  Yes, even if these links were green in your portchannel LACP always would play you a loop, for this purpose, he blocked because of the fact that you have more links (aggregate bandwidth) between other switches so it is allowing more transmission between.

• problem by creating a virtual traditional NI-DAQ channel

  Hello friends,

  in fact I change computer daq to a machine, but for now I have problems when I try to create a virtual channel.

  I see the jury on the devices and interfaces but when I fill in the parameters of the analog track exactly in step giving the ports, and the channel of material not appear anything and when I finished the configuration in the virtual channel properties appears invalid configuration and there I can't select anything in the hardware channels.

  I don't know what is happening?

  I installed labview 2009 Windows 7 with MAX 5.0 and NI DAQ 9.4

  Please help me or ideas on the...

  Thank you...

  You change os or change at DAQmx. Traditional DAQ has been made obsolete when DAQmx was introduced with LabVIEW 7. If your card is one of the old cards that didn't is not supported by DAQmx, then Yes, you would also have to replace one if you stayed with windows 7.

• loop and multi com ports

  Hello world

  Store device data in Server series of STS (which has 16 com ports).

  But I need to use 7 series STS server com ports. I need to read that data 7 com ports and save in a file.

  Each com port has a different function (for example the reading of data or display).

  My question is,

  (1) can I use different while loop for each com ports (if each com port have various channels)?

  (2) if I use different while loops for each com ports, will there be problems (like data layering or stacking)?

  (3) using different loops can be considered as parallel processing? (if not, explain pls)

  the most important is

  (4) should I use a main while loop for all com ports 7?

  Kind regards

  You can run all ports in parallel, and as long as you don't create other dependencies between the loops, interference will not normally a problem. We do this all the time (32 ports ++), there could be a lot of incoming data on a port, or a slow response from a slave on another port... and you do not want other ports to get affected by it.

  With the help of several ports with multiple loops is very rigid though (you will need to re-encode if the number of ports changes). It is best to dynamically create a VI 'port manager' for each port (open a reference to a reentrant VI, one LIVES, or create a copy of a VI on request at the opening, a reference to that - and then run with the run method with the input set to false, queue...) and use queues to get data in and out of each port/port manager.

• With respect to the ether channel

  Hi friends,

  I have a few basics of manufacturing of switch ports 1 Channel eil. I just want to know something.

  I have 4 switches from cisco 2960 to which many users are connected. None VLAN are that the only default vlan 1 is here. Now I want to make the channel of ether on the switch 1, which has 24 fast etherenet ports. Can I do port 1-8 as a channel of the ether related to users or I can do only eil channel

  ports that are connectd to other switches. If I can, how the other switches will be comnicate with the bundalled of switch ports in the channel of the ether in the switch 1. Please help me... 0o0o in advance.

  Hello Sabine,.

  You can't do the port connected to the normal PC user as the ether (of media storage/server) channel and in your scenario, you can only do etherchannel between your switches.

  Once the channel of the ether is done, there will be another created interface called port-channel, which will undergo the same properties as access/trunk depending on your configuration

  As you create the channel on both switches, they can identify the etherchannel and communicate each oher

  Hope this helps

  Haris

  Please rate all the helpful post!

• UCS Manager of port feeder error

  Hey members,.

  I use in this critical error on my UCS Manager. Member of San 1/12 of the Port - Channel on interconnect fabric A is down, subscription to the bottom.

  It worked before. After an upgrade if this message began to appear. Someone has an idea?

  Hi Mark,

  Is your switch upstream a SDM or N5K? (Fabric interconnects UCS--> MDS / N5K?).

  If so you are more likely to fall on a known bug that I've linked below;

  https://Tools.Cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCty04686/?reffering_site=dumpcr

  To help me to check if it is the bug on your fabric to interconnect and switch upstream could you run the following command;

  Setting wwn Show

  If your output is then as says the bug you will be running in it;

  XX:xx:00:2 has: 6a: XX:XX:XX

  OR

  XX:xx:8 c: 60:4f:xx:xx:xx

  Work around this is to update your MDS or N5K switch. This bug is due to the fact that upstream switch does not recognize codes MAC YES fabric interconnects. Since the Port of SAN-channels is a Cisco proprietary technology must be able to recognize it so that it works correctly. Once that you upgrade your switch upstream port-channel should continue to function normally.

  Best regards

  Qiese Sa'di

• Port Trunk on Vmware EXSi 5?

  Hello

  We have vShpere Essentials more here with EXSi 5. I want to trunk 4 times of the network ports for each host. Then on Vmware, we can choose what VLAN belongs to the Virtual Machine.

  I think I know how to configure the Cisco switch. Series 4 ports in a trunk and puts all 4 ports in a channel group. I don't know how to configure Vmware. Someone has links to blogs with guides step by step please?

  Thank you

  QantasA380 wrote:

  Thanks for your help. I'll test this tomorrow (if I have time). I guess it's just a trunk mode standard switchport - nothing special on the cisco switch otherwise?

  Thank you

  Yes, that's correct.

  It is recommended to configure the portfast too.

• Option named pipe to add the missing Serial Port to Linux host

  Hi all

  I try to add a serial port as a channel named for a kernel debugging

  the installer, but this option is missing (see screenshot1). There are

  However the options to add the serial port in the file/socket.

  The host is 64-bit Fedora 10 2.6.27.24 - 170.2.68.fc10.x86_64 running.

  Workstation is 6.5.2 build-156735. I found that the named pipe option is missing, regardless of the type of the guest OS.

  I had posted this last week.

  http://communities.VMware.com/message/1267552

  and he said since as soon as I put in the following options in the marked .vmx file, a serial port option came (see screenshot2).

  Serial0.present = 'TRUE '.

  Serial0.filetype = 'pipe '.

  Serial0.filename = "/ tmp/com_1".

  I realized that I have a VM as the serial port server and others as a customer. So adding the option-

  Serial0.pipe.endpoint = 'server '.

  However, this option is breaking the vm configs (cannot start VM until I have delete this line).

  Please see the attached screenshot3 6.5.2 on Windows and you will see that there is a different and complete serial port setting to the research. You can easily set a virtual machine as a client/server side of the connection series on Windows.

  I would really appreciate if someone could give me some pointers as to why this difference between Linux and Windows, and how to get the type parameters for the serial ports under Linux Windows?

  My main goal for the purchase of workstation was to do kernel debugging using the serial ports, and now I'm totally paralyzed because of this. Pointers and suggestions are greatly welcome.

  Thank you very much

  HS

  no need to apologize

  Hey - if you work with functions like this - use the vmx directly - file so you can be sure that you get what you order

  ___________________________________

  VMX-settings- VMware-liveCD - VM-infirmary