Port of SAN-Television - no operational Member

Similar Questions

• Remove the ' system VLAN "Nexus 1000V port-profile

  We have a Dell M1000e blade chassis with a number of Server Blade M605 ESXi 5.0 using the Nexus 1000V for networking.  We use 10 G Ethernet fabric B and C, for a total of 4 10 cards per server.  We do not use the NIC 1 G on A fabric.  We currently use a NIC of B and C fabrics for the traffic of the virtual machine and the other card NETWORK in each fabric for traffic management/vMotion/iSCSI VM.  We currently use iSCSI EqualLogic PS6010 arrays and have two configuration of port-groups with iSCSI connections (a physical NIC vmnic3 and a vmnic5 of NIC physical).

  We have added a unified EMC VNX 5300 table at our facility and we have configured three VLANs extra on our network - two for iSCSI and other for NFS configuration.  We've added added vEthernet port-profiles for the VLAN of new three, but when we added the new vmk # ports on some of the ESXi servers, they couldn't ping anything.   We got a deal of TAC with Cisco and it was determined that only a single port group with iSCSI connections can be bound to a physical uplink both.

  We decided that we would temporarily add the VLAN again to the list of VLANS allowed on the ports of trunk of physical switch currently only used for the traffic of the VM. We need to delete the new VLAN port ethernet-profile current but facing a problem.

  The Nexus 1000V current profile port that must be changed is:

  The DenverMgmtSanUplinks type ethernet port profile

  VMware-port group

  switchport mode trunk

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 2308-2306, 2311-2315

  passive auto channel-group mode

  no downtime

  System vlan 2308-2306, 2311-2315

  MGMT RISING SAN description

  enabled state

  We must remove the list ' system vlan "vlan 2313-2315 in order to remove them from the list" trunk switchport allowed vlan.

  However, when we try to do, we get an error about the port-profile is currently in use:

  vsm21a # conf t

  Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.

  vsm21a (config) #-port ethernet type DenverMgmtSanUplinks profile

  vsm21a(config-port-Prof) # system vlan 2308-2306, 2311-2312

  ERROR: Cannot delete system VLAN, port-profile in use by Po2 interface

  We have 6 ESXi servers connected to this Nexus 1000V.  Originally they were MEC 3-8 but apparently when we made an update of the firmware, they had re - VEM 9-14 and the old 6 VEM and associates of the Channel ports, are orphans.

  By example, if we look at the port-channel 2 more in detail, we see orphans 3 VEM-related sound and it has no ports associated with it:

  Sho vsm21a(config-port-Prof) # run int port-channel 2

  ! Command: show running-config interface port-canal2

  ! Time: Thu Apr 26 18:59:06 2013

  version 4.2 (1) SV2 (1.1)

  interface port-canal2

  inherit port-profile DenverMgmtSanUplinks

  MEC 3

  vsm21a(config-port-Prof) # sho int port-channel 2

  port-canal2 is stopped (no operational member)

  Material: Port Channel, address: 0000.0000.0000 (bia 0000.0000.0000)

  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,

  reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255

  Encapsulation ARPA

  Port mode is trunk

  Auto-duplex, 10 Gb/s

  Lighthouse is off

  Input stream control is turned off, output flow control is disabled

  Switchport monitor is off

  Members in this channel: Eth3/4, Eth3/6

  Final cleaning of "show interface" counters never

  102 interface resets

  We can probably remove the port-channel 2, but assumed that the error message on the port-profile in use is cascading on the other channel ports.  We can delete the other port-channel 4,6,8,10 orphans and 12 as they are associated with the orphan VEM, but we expect wil then also get errors on the channels of port 13,15,17,19,21 and 23 who are associated with the MEC assets.

  We are looking to see if there is an easy way to fix this on the MSM, or if we need to break one of the rising physical on each server, connect to a vSS or vDS and migrate all off us so the Nexus 1000V vmkernel ports can clean number VLAN.

  You will not be able to remove the VLAN from the system until nothing by using this port-profile. We are very protective of any vlan that is designated on the system command line vlan.

  You must clean the canals of old port and the old MEC. You can safely do 'no port-channel int' and "no vem" on devices which are no longer used.

  What you can do is to create a new port to link rising profile with the settings you want. Then invert the interfaces in the new port-profile. It is generally easier to create a new one then to attempt to clean and the old port-profile with control panel vlan.

  I would like to make the following steps.

  Create a new port-profile with the settings you want to

  Put the host in if possible maintenance mode

  Pick a network of former N1Kv eth port-profile card

  Add the network adapter in the new N1Kv eth port-profile

  Pull on the second NIC on the old port-profile of eth

  Add the second network card in the new port-profile

  You will get some duplicated packages, error messages, but it should work.

  The other option is to remove the N1Kv host and add it by using the new profile port eth.

  Another option is to leave it. Unless it's really bother you no VMs will be able to use these ports-profile unless you create a port veth profile on this VLAN.

  Louis

• UCS - san-port-channel on vpc

  Hello

  I hope someone can help with this,

  I have a Setup with 2 Nexus of 5548 connected via a link of vpc peers and a keepalive, these two nexus switch have a link of standard VPC to a 6500 upstream. It works fine,

  Then, there are several native FC connections of the 5548 to of 6248. I know that there is the possibility to configure the channel port of CF on the UCS 2.0 but it is possible to link 5548 CF interfaces in a port channel san through a vpc between the nexus of 5548.

  so, for example, I can port-channel which follows through a vpc or is a channel of port san, limited to the same nexus only switch ports.

  Fc1/31 & fc1/32 fabric sent to-> NX5K - 1 Port fc1/31 & NX5K - 2 Port fc1/32 (san port-channel 10 on a VPC)

  Fabric B fc1/31 & fc1/32 passed to-> NX5K - 1 Port fc1/32 & NXFK - 2 Port fc1/31 (san port-channel 11 on a VPC)

  Thank you

  Ray.

  It is not possible. VPC is the only Layer 2 ethernet port channel. Port channel San cannot be built through vpc

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPhone App

• Port-channel problem between fabric Interconnect and vPC N7K

  Hi all

  I have a problem with the Port Uplink channel between fabric interconnect with N7K using vPC

  It's my network for the UCS deployment topology

  

  N7K I configured vPC for red link and green linkto the fabric Interconnect A I has configured the Port-Channel with Member is Port 1 and Port 2, uplink is red link. Interconnection fabric B, I have configured the Port-Channel with Member's Port 1 and Port 2, uplink's green link.

  The interface port-channel on N7K show is good, each port-channel upwards and have all members. But the fabric Interconnnect, when I see in the UCS Manager, the status of the Port-Channel on Fabic A and fabric B dysfunction not more info: no operational Member. Although all the link is a link to the top and I've got the status of the Port Channel is enabled in the UCS Manager. When I see the properties Port 1, Port to Port-Channel 2, I see the number of members status is: individual. This means channel port is not up and no member in this configuration. I want to using the port-channel load balance and more bandwidth for the uplink of 20Gig. I don't understand why?

  Please help me solve this problem, I have to send the screenshot of UCS Manager when I show the status of the Port-Channel and Port-member in port-channel to reach items.

  Can someone help me solve this problem, thanks a lot. References, please include elements for more details on the fault.

  Thank you

  Trung.

  Hello Nguyen,

  Since the two N7k please collect:

  SH cdp nei

  SH run membership in. X int

  SH sum port-chan

  Thank you

  Matthew

• No operational members and UCS vPC

  I get the following error message when you try to configure a vPC to a set of 6248 FIs to a set of N5Ks. Lacp and vpc are enabled on the 5ks.

  "No operational Member".

  Sho vpc br

  Legend:

  (*) - local vPC is down, transfer via vPC peer-link

  domain mail order ID: 1

  Status of peers: peers contiguity formed ok

  vPC KeepAlive status: peer is alive

  Consistency of configuration status: success

  State of coherence by vlan: success

  State of consistency of type 2: success

  role of the vPC: secondary

  Configured number of VPC: 1

  Peer gateway: disabled

  Duplicate assets excluded VLAN: -.

  Graceful consistency check: enabled

  The automatic recovery status: activated (timeout = 240 seconds)

  Sho vpc consistency-parameters int BP 22

  Legend:

  Type 1: vPC will be suspended in the event of incompatibility

  Name Type Local Peer value

  -------------               ----  ---------------------- -----------------------

  Do not close the Lan 1 no

  STP Port Type DEFAULT 1

  Port STP guard 1 none none

  STP STD simulate PVST 1 DEFAULT

  mode                        1     on                     on

  Speed 1 10 Gbit/s, 10 Gb/s

  1 full duplex

  Trunk to trunk for Mode 1 port

  VLAN 1 1 1 native

  MTU                         1     1500                   1500

  Port admin mode 1

  map of vPC type 1 empty empty

  Allowed VLAN - 1, xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 1-4094

  Sho int BP 22 br

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  VLAN port-channel Type Mode State reason speed Protocol

  Interface

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Trunk eth Po22 1 place no a - 10 G (D) no

  feat(Config-if) #.

  Sho run membership int BP 22

  ! Command: show running-config interface port-channel22 membership

  ! Time: Kills Sep 28 18:31:06 2009

  version 6.0 (2) N2 (2)

  interface port-channel22

  switchport mode trunk

  Speed 10000

  VPC 22

  interface Ethernet1/15

  switchport mode trunk

  channel-group 22

  interface Ethernet1/16

  switchport mode trunk

  channel-group 22

  Terry,

  I got the same error when starting to integrate UCS with the Nexus product line. In addition to LACP, how vPC that you have on "every" 5 K? In the above diagrams, you should have 2. I bet that you have only 1.

  Mike

• Effect of loss of link IOM UCS on CF in Port-channel mode

  Hello

  We recently discovered that when UCS Server Ports are port-channel mode, loss of a member link causes CF traffic disruption in a VMware environment.  Host VMware never sees a path down and his guest enter a time-out period of IO wait.  Once expired the time-out of comments, a SCSI reset restores connectivity of storage.  We responded to several customers and said that this is the expected behavior.  This is of concern to us and how it affects the design decisions.

  Any contribution is appreciated.

  Thank you.

  It is true, that you expect the SCSI timeout, and then the operating system must redo a flogi. Of course, I guess that you have CF multipathing installation and work; Therefore, no disruption to traffic.

  Without port-channel, the vhba on the failing tissue will go down; and the management of multi-channel FC is the only solution.

• UCS Manager of port feeder error

  Hey members,.

  I use in this critical error on my UCS Manager. Member of San 1/12 of the Port - Channel on interconnect fabric A is down, subscription to the bottom.

  It worked before. After an upgrade if this message began to appear. Someone has an idea?

  Hi Mark,

  Is your switch upstream a SDM or N5K? (Fabric interconnects UCS--> MDS / N5K?).

  If so you are more likely to fall on a known bug that I've linked below;

  https://Tools.Cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCty04686/?reffering_site=dumpcr

  To help me to check if it is the bug on your fabric to interconnect and switch upstream could you run the following command;

  Setting wwn Show

  If your output is then as says the bug you will be running in it;

  XX:xx:00:2 has: 6a: XX:XX:XX

  OR

  XX:xx:8 c: 60:4f:xx:xx:xx

  Work around this is to update your MDS or N5K switch. This bug is due to the fact that upstream switch does not recognize codes MAC YES fabric interconnects. Since the Port of SAN-channels is a Cisco proprietary technology must be able to recognize it so that it works correctly. Once that you upgrade your switch upstream port-channel should continue to function normally.

  Best regards

  Qiese Sa'di

• Satellite L20 PSL2ZE: Identified as 1.1 instead of 2.0 USB Ports

  Model: L20 - 264 (PSL2ZE)
  OS: Windows XP Home SP2

  For some reason, 2 of the 3 USB ports are identified by the operating system as USB 1.1 devices (Standard OpenHCD USB Host Controller) instead of USB 2.0 (Standard Enhanced PCI to USB Host Controller). Is this as expected?

  User reported this behavior after installing a few webcam drivers (summary details, apparently a Logitech QuickCam Pro).

  Also, I am unable to find a suitable chipset driver package, since for this model, the driver page offers only a package Intel while device ID numbers point to ATI IXP SB400 chipset.

  Any ideas?

  Hello

  The same appears in my device manager!
  I have a Standard Enhanced PCI controller USB host and two inputs OpenHCD USB Host Controller Standard.
  But I put t have problems with the speed of the USB or something like that

  If you wish, you can remove the USB controllers in Device Manager and then restart the laptop again!

  This should load the USB drivers again!

  Check it out

• Port Replicator III + very high CPU when you move the usb mouse only in W2k

  Tecra M2 with a port replicator III +.

  It is set to dual boot XP and Windows 2000 (yes I know it is well a bit but I have a bunch of stuff installed in win2k it is difficult to find these days).

  XP is very good at 100%, but with win 2000 if I use my * USB mouse * on the * ports port replicator and waggle the mouse around - the * CPU * jumps from 0 to * 70 + % * use (System process that seems indicatates like IRQ problem). If I plug the mouse into the ports of the laptop (when the laptop is connected) - it's fine, no more than 5% cpu usage. It's a microsoft basic mouse. I really believe that this is a problem of usb any, because the cpu jumps a little if I type quickly on my usb keyboard (only a few %). It comes with the usb ports on all the Replicator.

  Any ideas? I don't really want to plug my mouse in the morning because it beats a little interest to have a docking station in the first place! I have installed mobile extensions. All other aspects of the replicator are fine

  Martin

  Huh it will not be easy to find the right explanation for this.
  At the moment when Tecra M2 has been offered on the market as Replicator port compatible Toshiba offered Toshiba Advanced Port Replicator III (no +) and at that time both supported in operating system has been tested with it.

  Toshiba later designed Toshiba Advanced Port Replicator III + and confirmed the compatibility with Tecra M2, but obviously with more recent WXP (at this time).
  So now, you've been following situation: you use most recent Replicator port, but with much older operating system so I assume that there may be a compatibility issue with W2K.

  I can't imagine use you so often with W2K and if so, may not be so problematic to connect the mouse directly on the cell s USB port.

  Sorry, but I don't think that there is nothing you can do about it.

• Model a block synchronous dual-port RAM with LabVIEW FPGA

  This question caught my attention recently.

  I am trying to model a particular design element called "RAMB4_S8_S8" with the LabVIEW FPGA module. This element is a block synchronous dual-port RAM allowing simultaneous access to two ports independently from each other. That being said, a port can perform read/write operation to this RAM while at the same time, the other port might be able to do the same thing. There are two opportunities of possible port conflict, however. The first is when both ports are trying to write to the same memory cell. The other scenario is when a port writes in a cell memory while at the same time the other port reads from it. Other than that, everything should be a legitimate operation.

  In order to reproduce this I select memory block that is integrated into my FPGA target. An interface is configured to be the playback mode, and the other is set to write fashion. For the option of arbitration, I let the two interfaces to be "arbitrate if several applicants only. Then I got a compiler error when I tried to run my FPGA code for this model in a SCTL. The error message is something like "several objects to request access to a resource through a resource configured with option interface" arbitrate if several applicants only ", which is supported only in the single-cycle Timed loop if there is only a single applicant by interface.

  This error goes away if I replace the SCTL with a simple while loop, but not what I would like to implement. So I wonder if there is a better solution to this problem, or is it just the limitation of the LabVIEW FPGA module.

  Thank you.

  Yes, you can use a form of conduct to perform the operations you want in the generations clock cycles, but all the code is inside a single SCTL. Basically, read the first address and storing in a register in a single cycle and then read the second address in the second clock cycle. This would allow you to two readings of valid memory every clock cycle 2. I have included a crude extract to illustrate the concept. The case selectors are identical with address A being connected to the memory in the true case, B in the case of fake address. Your biggest model memory dual port will be intact, but it will operate at 1/2 rate.

  Take a look at the white paper that provides more details on the construction of memory:

  Data on a target FPGAS (FPGA Module)

  The ball on the memory block indicates that memory block double port cannot be applied in a configuration of reading, which is a double ROM. access read/write port must be imitated with custom code.

• Internet connection with only a single cable to the ADSL PoRt ADSL in windows7

  Hi, sorry to ask this dumb questions

  It is possible to connect internet with only cable ADSL ISP in there.
  He got'in Port ADSL
  the operating system is windows7
  I already tried with checking the LAN settings in network and sharing Center
  but it does not solve my problem :(
  Please help me fast, the sooner the better :D

  Hello

  Thanks for posting your query in Microsoft Community and gives us the opportunity to help.

  Yes, you can connect to the internet using cable ADSL to ADSL Port in the Windows 7 operating system.

  See these articles for more information on the same:

  What do I need to connect to the Internet?

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/what-do-I-need-to-connect-to-the-Internet

   

  Allows to connect to the Internet mobile broadband

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/use-mobile-broadband-to-connect-to-the-Internet

   

  Should which modem I use to connect to the Internet?

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/which-modem-should-I-use-to-connect-to-the-Internet

  Hope this information helps. For any other related Windows help, do not hesitate to contact us and we will be happy to help you.

• Problems whit my usb 2.0 port (1.0 working)

  Hello!

  I have problems whit my usb 2.0 port, when I update my operating system to windows 7 Home premium to windows 7 ultimate without hp software (formatting only the c: local drive and still having the recovery partition) pilot who or what I need to do for my port is working properly because when I transfer to my external hard drive or USB data transfer rate is max 6 MB/s, which is too slow because I want to make a backup

  Thanks in advance!

  Data sheet:

  HP desktop PC

  Model: p6404y

  Hello:

  See if the chipset driver installation will fix USB issues:

  32 bits:

  http://www.nvidia.com/object/nForce-Vista-Win7-32bit-15.56-driver.html

  64-bit:

  http://www.nvidia.com/object/nForce-Vista-Win7-64bit-15.56-driver.html

  Paul

• How to connect VMware to SAN

  Hello

  I have configured SAN with RAID 10 and 3 volumes of 1 TB each. I have 3 Dell server that I want to connect to the SAN. I SAN of Dell and dell powerConnect switch. To connect my machine EXi to SAN, do I have to master. (ISCSI and VMware traffic?

  Any help would be appreciated

  SAN F/C controller - need to set up a group of FABRIC

  ===================================================================

  Reference DELL SERVER (ESX) with port HBA card F/C 1 connect to the port of SWITCH SAN DELL F/C 1

  DELL SERVER B (ESX) with F/C map HBA 1 port to connect to the port of SWITCH SAN DELL F/C 2

  DELL SERVER C (ESX) with F/C map HBA 1 port to connect to the port of SAN DELL F/C 3 SWITCH

  STORAGE SAN DELL F/C 1 connected to SWITCH SAN DELL F/C 7

  Read/write of data via SAN F/C

  Ethe LAN Controller - (optional) to set up the Group VLAN

  ===================================================================

  Reference DELL SERVER (ESX) with Ethe port card NIC 1 connect to the DELL LAN SWITCH ELE 1 port

  DELL SERVER B (ESX) with Ethe card NIC 1 port to connect to the port of SWITCH LAN DELL ELE 2

  DELL SERVER C (ESX) with Ethe port card NIC 1 connect to the port of SWITCH LAN DELL Ethe 3

  NETWORK STORAGE SAN DELL 1 connected to Ethe DELL LAN SWITCH 7

  Management of the system through LAN Ethe

  Additional VCenter Server to configure all ESXs

  Trunking is not necessary.

• ESXi 4.1 or ESXi 5.0 with iSCSI SAN

  Hello

  I'm trying to establishing an environment that is / will be an iSCSI SAN backend entirely.  I know of a lot of reading that the best practice is to config the ESXi host with:

  VMKernel > vmnic > physical network adapter > switch ports > port on SAN (config 1:1 - no grouping of vmnic)

  Environment:

  ESXi 4.1 & 5.0

  Force10 switches

  EqualLogic iSCSI SAN (PS4000 & 6000)

  Here's my real question (playing the Devil's advocate):

  Why I shouldn't team 3-4 vnmics on a vswitch with multiple vmkernel ports?

  Given my environment.  Can someone point me to a technical document that explains what will / could happen if I set up the environment ESXi in this way?

  Thank you

  BDAboy22

  So, basically, we want the SAN to take full responsibility for the failover instead of the network and/or the SAN for who should resolve the failure (which could lead to the time of restitutio in integrum longer session).   I understand that correctly?

  Yes, that's right, we want to stack storage for vSphere manage with path selection and tipping - and by connecting each vmknic directly to the physical vmnic map we sort of "simulate" how to CF cards and also ignores the network failover mechanisms. As you probably know you also need to "bind" the iSCSI Software to the two vmnic (GUI now in 5.0, esxcli in 4.x)

• Solaris event ports

  Hi all!

  According to the Suite of Communications
  Release notes for the patch 4 version 7

  https://wikis.Oracle.com/display/CommSuite7U4/new+features#newfeatures-MMPandIMAPPerformanceImprovedonSolarisbyUseofSolarisEventPorts

  event ports are now used by default instead of the poll() system call.

  Is it possible to use the poll() system call but not the port event?

  The operating system is Solaris 10 sparc.

  Thank you, monk.

  The name of the option is 'base.preferpoll' (in the unified config) or "local.preferpoll" (legacy config). If you want to use these options with default settings in production, please contact support. With the approach of the election, there are a nanosleep() call in the main loop to work around the problems of scalability with the poll system call. This causes the system seem to use less CPU, but that he did at the expense of latency over high. With port event approach, there is no artificial nanosleep appeal so events are dispatched immediately and the system can turn more quickly through the main loop under a moderate load.