Prevent the loading application if the user is in offline mode

Similar Questions

• Prevent the user from uninstalling the application

  Hi friends I want to prevent the user from uninstalling the application on my mobile phone blackberry if I give how do I do it and how to fix this inaccessblity thanks to programming, I mean putting prevention in the form of mobile etc.

  BES policies can ensure that an application is not deleted.  Sorry should have mentioned that.

  Installation of OS 5, I've mentioned is:

  CodeModuleListener

  This will get called when a module is removed or marked for deletion.  Code here could probably try to download and re - install an application removed, however, it is a signed interface, so I'm sure that RIM could quickly find developers who have tried to use this interface for dubious means.

  You are however correct Ted, because it won't stop someone wiping their Blackberry.  In addition, if you remove the application that would be re - install itself, then it's history anyway.

  I think that the advantages of using this method to tidy, after a deletion (for example delete associated files on the SD card) makes a worthwhile addition to the API.

• Prevent the user from changing the page in URL - Apex 5

  Dear community of Apex,

  We seek to protect our handling of URL pages.  The protection of session state is enabled, and each page has page value «Arguments must have Checksum» access protection  However, the documentation seems to discuss in order to prevent the user from element values in the URL.  We want to prevent the user to change the page ID in the URL.  Currently, a user is able to hack the URL and take in the middle of a wizard process for example.  Is it possible to stop this?  Other that an element of creative previous train stop check.

  * Version: Application Express 5.0.1.00.06

  Thank you

  Barry

  bSamuel wrote:

  We seek to protect our handling of URL pages.  The protection of session state is enabled, and each page has page value «Arguments must have Checksum» access protection  However, the documentation seems to discuss in order to prevent the user from element values in the URL.  We want to prevent the user to change the page ID in the URL.  Currently, a user is able to hack the URL and take in the middle of a wizard process for example.  Is it possible to stop this?  Other that an element of creative previous train stop check.

  Hi Barry

  Affecting the security attribute Access Page Protection page No. URL Access and navigate between pages using the type of the Page Management Branch (uncheck the option creates a branch using redirection page in the Wizard) will avoid this:

  No URL access -Page can not be found using a URL, but the page can be the target of a type of Page Management Branch, is not doing a URL redirect.

  It is a little more restrictive that a normal direction of the session state values cannot be positioned or erased declaratively in the branch, but is not often necessary in a several step wizard, and it's pretty simple to work round using prior processes - or post-branche or by referencing the item values directly from other pages.

• How to prevent the user to create the 'analysis' and 'dashboard '?

  We have a requirement that is to restrict the user create new 'analysis' and 'dashboard '. As we know when the connection ' host: port / analytical, in the top of the page there is a drop down list of 'New' where users can create new 'analysis' and 'Dashboard', how to set up the privilege to disable the option 'Analysis' and 'dashboard '?

  OBIEE version: Oracle Business Intelligence 11.1.1.7.0

  Thank you
  Jinbo

  Summary:

  1 set the "New Menu" permission in the 'home page and Header' refusal, then the 'New' menu will disappear from the top right of the page, which prevents the user to create dashboards and new anlysis

  2. in order to not allow the user to modify the catalog, set the permission of "access user interface of the catalogue"in the ' welcome and header' to refuse."

  3. even made 1 and 2, we have always have a path that the user can create new report, it's "House"menu." To avoid this, our method is to set the explicit right to catalog for the application role.

  Thank you
  Jinbo

• prevent the user to change the color of report and highlight

  I used 5 APEX

  After matches the report as shown below

  

  
  

  I need prevent the user to change or remove the color & saved report

  Concerning

  Hello Rara,

  I don't know if there is an option how to remove just cancel 'X' button/image filter defined/facts highlights. Maybe some gurus should help.

  You can remove just 'X' next to point culminating with inspect the attributes of the button and set the attribute for visibility for it.

  In my case:

  button[data-highlight-id] {
      visibility: hidden !important;
  }
  

  You can see the demo on:

  https://Apex.Oracle.com/pls/Apex/f?p=16502:

  Demo/demo

  TAB: Refresh IR 5.0 Plugin

  Concerning

  J

• How to prevent the user from creating jobs

  Hello
  
  We need to prevent the user from creating jobs on a dev environment. It's a 10.2.0.4 standard database on 64-bit linux.
  
  Their scheme has only connect and resource roles. Is it possible to prevent them from creating jobs? 11 g, it's permission to CREATE a TASK, but I don't know how I can do this in 10g.
  
  Thanks for all the ideas!

  I try again...

  If you revoke execute privilege on DBMS_JOB package with 'regular' users (i.e. non admin), then they will not be able to do anything, including by creating with the SUBMISSION process.

  No you want?

• How to prevent the user open and play a flash game on multiple browser windows at the same time?

  Hi guys,.

  I made a game as the same site: http://www.Netent.com/games/table-games/Texas-Holdem-Pro-series/

  Anyone know how to prevent the user opened and play the game on multiple windows browser both?

  I used the command of flash to embed flash into a page aspx and connection to sql server

  Someone help me, please.

  p/s: Sorry, my English is not good

  You can use localconnection.

• Prevent the user from type sms or email until the application runs

  Hi all

  I want to make a request. Until the application is running can not the user able to type anything in the application as well as the native application means write sms or e-mail.

  I have replace the keyChar() method. She works in application. Now I am not able to type any char in my application, but I am still able to type any message or an e-mail. Application runs in the background.

  Can anyone how I can achieve this?

  Thank you

  Neeraj Chauhan

  you are not able to intercept keystrokes to other applications.

• GPO: CD and DVD: deny write access prevents the user to use their USB Pen drive, but other users or ok

  My users have secure readers Pen who throw a CDROM partition with a secure logon application that decrypts the key to mass storage USB the USB on successful logon. The problem I have is that users who install the USB cannot initialize then the app launcher CDROM to enter their password to access the element of the rendering it useless USB mass storage.

  However, any user who has the same type of USB key that plugs in to the endpoint that has already installed the drivers is able to access their own USB or the other users of USB stick (knowledge by providing the password).

  So I've isolated the problem being down to the presence of the GPO setting shown above on the removable storage access policy and by not having not this policy in place when a user installs the USB key, they have no problems, but I can't find a way to clean a user that is already broken, even if I delete the GPO from this user , remove their local profile so that they start as a new user (no roaming or other data) and use a variety of utilities such as USBOblivion to clear the registry and the file system of the USB and installation. When the original user logs back and then installs the USB again, they have the same problem, but no one else does. I have the same problem if I try with another user or administrator as the first user after "clean it up". Everyone can use the pen drive except the user who originally installed when the GPO was in place.

  If I move the user to a new endpoint or rebuild their end point, then they have no problem being the USB setup and then use it because the GPO has been deleted, so what I need to know, that's what he's talking about installing USB and the GPO which is tattooed somewhere in Windows and how can I remove it?

  Hello

  Welcome to the Microsoft community.

  I suggest you post this query on the TechNet forums.

  You can refer a link below to send this request.

  https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?category=w7itpro&filter=AllTypes&sort=lastpostdesc

  Let us know if you have a Windows problem, we will be happy to help you.

• Prevent the user SYS acess to non-redacted data in Oracle 12 c

  Hello

  I have a strategy of writing created with the following options:

  function_type = > DBMS_REDACT. FULL,

  expression = > ' sys_context ("userenv", "session_user")! = "MY_REDACTION" ')

  By default users SYS has the following privileges to the redaction: EXEMPT DML DRAFTING a STRATEGY and EXEMPT DDL WRITING

  the DBA role has the following privileges to the redaction: EXEMPT DDL DRAFTING a STRATEGY and EXEMPT DML WRITING

  the EEXP_FULL_DATABAS role has the following privileges to the redaction: POLICE TAX-FREE of REDACTION.

  When I revoke all these privileges users/roles above, the user SYS was always 'see' the non-redacted data.

  How can I prevent the SYS user does not ' see ' the non-redacted data?

  Thanks and greetings

  Hello Laury,

  We can't prevent the SYS to see the redacted data. It is exempt from these policies.

  You can prevent to access the table with the Vault database.

  Kind regards

  Vlad

• Prevents the user to insert only the main block

  Hello

  Form [32 bit] Version 6.0.8.11.3 (Production) and win 8.

  1. I have a block of master / detail, but normally, the user can insert records in the master, or in the retail block,.

  I stopped to insert only in detail a mating by changing the property "to prevent operations without a master" of the relationship.

  but he can always insert only in the main block, how to prevent this?

  2. what was spent on the forum, there is no one answering questions, there are simple questions that I posted about two days ago

  and they're stuck since when, where are the people?

  See this thread:

  Block master / detail: how to save changes if the retail block has a record

  ('Zlatko Sirotic' is my 'old' user id - before the 7 Jive OTN forum upgrade)

  Concerning

• Empty field prevents the user to connect

  Good afternoon

  How to prevent a user to digitally sign the document if there is a blank field.

  The issue I'm having is that the digital signature line appears. When the user connects, the document is saved. After you run, my java code running the signature of compensation.

  The thing is that we have a document saved with a signature in there.

  Is it possible that I can have a JavaScript to prevent the digital signature line if a field is empty?

  You must place the entire code after 'else' braces, as

  you have done with the code after the if statement.

• Prevent the user from printing and see some pages

  Here is the scenerio:

  The form has 4 pages.  I want only the user to see and know about page 1.

  I need to batch print the other 3 pages, each page in a separate batch

  Here is what I tried and the question resulting:

  1 format pages 2,3,4 as visible print only

  a. the user may say there are 3 other pages - they appear in white

  b. the user may see them if they decide to print

  2 format pages 2,3,4 as visible print only and restrict printing to the user

  a. I can't print without having to open each one with a password - works well with printing of lots per page

  3 format pages as hidden 2,3,4 - the user cannot tell or see the other 3 pages but:

  a. I can't print the pages

  3 format pages 2,3,4 as hidden and have the form submitted as xml and import them into the complete PDF

  a. There are fields that are changed dyamically based on the selection of the user (ie. selection of fonts), so that the xml import does not work for this

  Any ideas on how to "get my cake and eat it too."

  Hello

  You could try a hidden field that seeks the username «»

  There are security problems, and the script has to be in a position of trust. You can make this place a Javascript file inside the Acrobat folder. The penalty usually with trusted fuctions is that you must send to each user a copy of the js file and it should also put it in the appropriate folder.

  In your case is not a problem, because you only want the js file on your computer and do not need to distribute it to others.

  When you put the (downloaded) file in Acrobat / folder Javascript, Acrobat will load it automatically.

  

  In Acrobat, make sure that you have defined a 'name' in Edition / Preferences / Identity tab:

  

  When you open the PDF document, your user name will be on the field. This only happens if the js file is loaded in the correct folder on the computer that you are using.

  

  Once it's working, it's a simple step to include an if statement in the textfield, after the script located in the initialize event:

  If (this.rawValue == "lfalke") / / or whatever your username is set on...

  {

  Page2.presence = "visible";

  page3. Presence = "visible";

  page4. Presence = "visible";

  }

  on the other

  {

  Page2.presence = 'hidden ';

  page3. Presence = "hidden";

  page4. Presence = "hidden";

  }

  This means that the visibility of the three pages would be automatic. User with the js file AND your username could see pages 2-4, everyone would not see these pages.

  I know it's a little complicated, but once put in place it should continue to work OK.

  Hope that helps,

  Niall

• Maximum width on a text box does not prevent the user from typing too

  I have a text box with the field of the item to a width of 100, a maximum width of 240 and a height of 5. A user can type more than 240 characters on the screen (it does not seem to cut at any time) and then when they run they get an error of area too long given that the DB has only 240 tanks. (they can also copy and paste more than 240 characters here too)
  
  Is there anything else I need to do to make the field stop accepting characters after 240? I know I can cut the field before you save it in order to prevent the error, but want it so that the user can just walk more than they should.
  
  APEX 3.1, oracle 10g.

  Hi mimi,

  Make a "* Textarea character counter with *" rather than a normal text box. It will then work. If you want you can even use ' Textarea character Counter and check the spelling.

  Watch Ben always overload things: P

  Mike

• Prevent the user from interacting with the control

  I have a plan I want to "lock".  I don't want the user to be able to zoom or scroll the map at all, I tried touchEvents ignorant, but who has not worked for me.

  Any thoughts?

  In this case, I would usually throw in an "overlay" object, so it appears above the element in question (a simple way is to use a DockLayout and make sure the second element is defined after the first element, resulting in a higher position in the Z-order) in layers. The purpose of recovery would intercept activities of users and basically throw it out.

  According to the provision in question, however, it is probably easier to use the touchPropagationMode property VisualNode: https://developer.blackberry.com/native/reference/cascades/bb__cascades__visualnode.html#property-to... on the article in question, or its parent.