ProcessSearchHost high CPU - when does end?

Similar Questions

• RoboHelp HTML Version 7 - when does end for Version 7?

  I will repeat the question in the case: RoboHelp HTML Version 7 - when does end for Version 7?

  Thanks, Chuck

  You say 'I'll repeat the question in the present case' as if you've been ignored. Where did you go after because I didn't know asked recently.

  I understand the policy of Adobe support for the current and previous version. That would mean support ended with the introduction of RoboHelp 9 which was around June 2011.

  For the most part, you should get all the support you need here, but it will be limited to supporters of the forum are all passed to later versions. Therefore, until we can remember.

  Whether or not stick you with your current version will depend on your outings. If it's CHMS you should be fine and Print will be OK as long as stick you with a version of Word taken in charge by Rh7. If you need to generate WebHelp, expect all sorts of problems for which there is no solution.

  See www.grainge.org for creating tips and RoboHelp

  

  @petergrainge

• When does end for Windows Vista?

  I have 9 that is set as my default browser and understand the extended support will end in April 2017 according to Microsoft. I was not able to upgrade to Windows 7 on this P.C. & would like to know if there is no date scheduled for Firefox Support in Windows Vista? I set Firefox as my browser default if Vista will be supported for several years if taken in charge as it is now. What kind of support will be offered, as appropriate, in the future?

  A date has not been set. Actually WinXP SP2 & 3 are still supported by Mozilla for Firefox. I doubt if Mozilla support for Vista will end anytime in the near future.

  Overall, Mozilla does not select arbitrary deadlines to end operating system, Windows 2000 was the last to fall by the wayside on the need for Mozilla to update the program that was used to set up Firefox. The new version has not only supported Windows 2000 or Windows XP and WinXP SP1.

• High CPU when you try to get my camera with getusermedia

  I am developing an application that uses the camera and the microphone, and all works well on different browsers I tested, but when I get to Firefox on Linux I get this weird problem that it makes the Firefox CPU usage to soar to near 100% (between 96% and 103%) and he'll never actually displays the classic popup with confirmation of share the camera and microphone.
  You have this proposed problem?
  I have tested this application on Chrome under Windows and Linux and no problem, as I tested on Firefox Windows (23) and there is no problem, it is only on the Linux version (as 23) I is currently experiencing this issue.
  And is not only on my 'probably poorly built app' that I get this question, if I'm going to test it on www.simpl.info/gum or iambrandonn.github.com/WebcamSwiper I get the same behavior
  It's my info just in case system
  OS: Gentoo Linux
  Firefox: www-client/firefox-bin-23, 0
  Additional modules: Firebug and NoScript
  Tried with cleaning and starting with a new version of Firefox? Yes

  Let me know if I can give more info on this.
  Thank you!

  I had the same problem here.

  I found an old bug in project alsa-lib, which had been updated recently.

  https://bugs.Launchpad.NET/Ubuntu/+source/alsa-lib/+bug/1008600

  It is related to snd_device_name_hint and no doubt on this subject. There is also a commit in repo alsa-lib pointing to this bug.

  validation 23bf1dce9438c0cf74357928289aa8f06957c283
  Author: David Henningsson < [email protected] >
  Date: Fri Sep 13 13:21:44 2013 - 0400

     Fix access of freed memory in namehints
  
     Sometimes a hook manipulates the config tree, which makes currently
     running iterators point to freed memory. As a workaround, make two
     copies, one for the iterators and another for the hooks.
  
     BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008600
     Signed-off-by: David Henningsson <[email protected]>
     Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
  

  I'm trying to get a fix working on my system to know if these fixes firefox crash.

  BTW Im using 3.10.0 - rc2 + gentoo and pulseaudio - 2.1 - r1

• Portege Z930 - process 'System': high CPU when on battery usage

  I have a Portege Z930.
  A process called 'System' will appear in the Task Manager when I unplug the PC from the AC.

  I would like to know why is - this high utilization of the processor (from 9% to 18%) and keep my time above 70 ° c.
  It is very annoying, not only because of the temperature that hits the PC itself, but also because of the battery, which can not go over 1 hour and 30 minutes because of this process.

  It is not a virus, already CHECKED, don't ask.
  In addition, I don't know when it started, or why, so please don't ask.

  Thanks in advance,
  Nicolas.

  Until we start the discussion can you please tell us if you use the original pre-installed OS that you got with your laptop and use Toshiba eco mode when the laptop is running on battery power?

• Port Replicator III + very high CPU when you move the usb mouse only in W2k

  Tecra M2 with a port replicator III +.

  It is set to dual boot XP and Windows 2000 (yes I know it is well a bit but I have a bunch of stuff installed in win2k it is difficult to find these days).

  XP is very good at 100%, but with win 2000 if I use my * USB mouse * on the * ports port replicator and waggle the mouse around - the * CPU * jumps from 0 to * 70 + % * use (System process that seems indicatates like IRQ problem). If I plug the mouse into the ports of the laptop (when the laptop is connected) - it's fine, no more than 5% cpu usage. It's a microsoft basic mouse. I really believe that this is a problem of usb any, because the cpu jumps a little if I type quickly on my usb keyboard (only a few %). It comes with the usb ports on all the Replicator.

  Any ideas? I don't really want to plug my mouse in the morning because it beats a little interest to have a docking station in the first place! I have installed mobile extensions. All other aspects of the replicator are fine

  Martin

  Huh it will not be easy to find the right explanation for this.
  At the moment when Tecra M2 has been offered on the market as Replicator port compatible Toshiba offered Toshiba Advanced Port Replicator III (no +) and at that time both supported in operating system has been tested with it.

  Toshiba later designed Toshiba Advanced Port Replicator III + and confirmed the compatibility with Tecra M2, but obviously with more recent WXP (at this time).
  So now, you've been following situation: you use most recent Replicator port, but with much older operating system so I assume that there may be a compatibility issue with W2K.

  I can't imagine use you so often with W2K and if so, may not be so problematic to connect the mouse directly on the cell s USB port.

  Sorry, but I don't think that there is nothing you can do about it.

• High CPU when loading a new battery

  I have Thinkpad Edge 14 "and recently bought a new, original Lenovo battery 9-cell.
  I used to have before 6-cell battery. The problem with the new, is that if she is in charge of the CPU goes up at very high levels, up to 80-90%, if the computer is very slow.
  Any suggestions how to fix it?
  Thank you.
  Marek

  Hi Adam,.

  What happened in the meantime over the past two days, is that I was load and charge the battery for 3 - 4 times and it seems it's OK now. As I type now the battery is charging and the CPU is about 30 to 40%, which is reasonable.

  Hope it stays like that.

  Thanks for your attention and your help.

  Marek

• Lightroom 3.3 - 40% of CPU when doing nothing

  Hi, I just upgraded to LR to 3.3 and noticed that LR constantly consumes about 35% CPU at rest (no export, no rendering, etc)...

  I let "rest" for 8 hours and still the same effect, stop & restart and nothing changes.

  Any idea?

  My environment: Windows XP SP3, 2 GB of RAM.

  Thank you

  Julian

  Julian,

  You can use Quick Sysinternals to know where it is directed to all inputs and outputs. This could shed some light on what makes LR.

  Gossweiler beat

  Switzerland

• When does support for the end of windows vista Home premium

  When does support for the end of windows vista Home premium

  Original title: support

  Watch the news of Vista on this page:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/products/lifecycle

• 10.1.7 Adobe will not close in the Task Manager when you exit the program. High CPU

  Hello

  10.1.7 updated and I noticed that when you close the program, an instance of acrobat remains open in the Task Manager with the use of high CPU 50% +. Close any, unless you complete the task. If you open adobe still a new instance opens again consume more cpu and paralyzes the machine with high CPU. It's on computer 64-bit win 8. The work of previous 10.1.6 liberation for a while on the same machine without any problems.

  Thanks in advance

  How to restore for me

  1.

  Uninstall Acrobat X

  2.

  Used my initial installationfile for AcrobatX 10.0.0

  3.

  Downloaded for ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/acrobat/win/10.x/ 10.1.5 update

  List of compatible updates can be found here. http://helpx.Adobe.com/Acrobat/release-note/release-notes-Acrobat-Reader.html

• Windows 7 update - slow download, svchost high CPU usage

  I have a problem downloading by using the Windows Update application. This problem started after January 2016.  In the past, the request of update seems to work without the use of the svchost high CPU and with a reasonable download time.  There is usually a delay until the download has started, but then they ended quickly.

  I have 4 computers: 3 running Windows 7 Pro (CPU - Intel dual, i5 & i7) and 1 running Windows 7 Home (Intel i3).  If the problem is not related to the CPU hardware as best I can tell.

  My update setting is 'check for updates but let me download and install ".

  The Windows Update process includes 3 steps:
  1. identify the important and recommended updates for your computer.
  2. the selection and download updates.
  3. the creation of the restore point and of the installation, the selected updates.

  My problem is step 2, download the selected updates.  This happens on all 4 systems, and I do not expect a download to be this CPU load.  The download time is too long on all systems 4.

  My online search for answers has been frustrating, but several posts said search for viruses, malware and Trojans.  I ran Malwarebytes (free), Windows Defender, Norton Security and ESET (online) on systems and no objects are found.

  My most recent experience involved my Lenovo 7847 system (Intel dual core). Monday, May 23, I checked the updates and there were 15 updates important and 3 optional updates listed.

  After reviewing the updates, I chose the 15 updates and started the download process.  The svchost.exe that is associated with the update happened to 45-60% CPU usage, update status showed no size or % finished and the task manager - network or explore the process did not show any activity download for a long time.

  Finally, after about an hour, the update showed the download size and the % downloaded.  Svchost usage remains high during the time of whole download.  Once the download is complete, the restore point was created and updates have been installed, who also took some time (but it would be I/O CPU & Drive dependent).

  The download status has not changed during most of the time that the download process is running.  The Task Manager and process explore both show very little network activity up to that very near the end of the download procedure. There is therefore no real indication that the process is blocked or just turn very slowly.   It almost seems that the Microsoft servers are overloaded, they delay the download for some reason, or the process svchost and sub-process fail to create good handshake with the server for download.

  My Questions:

  1. Why is svchost usage so high when nothing seems to happen?
  2. Why does take an hour or more to download the updates?  These aren't the huge file sizes, and this attempt to update was almost 2 weeks after Patch Tuesday, then Microsoft servers should not be overloaded.
  3. Why is the situation unchanged for so long during the download process?
  4. most important, what can I do to change this situation?
   
  Thanks in advance for your help.

  My 'update problem' seems to have changed.  Checking updates takes a lot of CPU resources and a lot of time.

  We will leave well enough alone for now. [It took 3-4 hours for MU download/install updates of June on my Win7 boxes].

  But please bookmark this thread. If the behavior persists in July - and especially in August, respond to this thread instead of starting a new. Good luck!

• Use high CPU (35% average) while System Idle process CPU about 98% but frustrated by "[name of the prog] has stopped working".

  Hello

  I am trying to help someone with a laptop HP model g6-1202sa (Windows 7 Home Premium 64 - bit, another record at the end of the post).

  I think that Windows is now updated and drivers, but the problem remains also.

  The laptop has the symptoms mentioned in the title I found the Manager tasks.  Laptop fan is on a large part of the time, and the owner says that, during the execution of something more intensive than Skype for example of internet browsing, they get a warning from Norton on high CPU. Resource monitor shows that system interrupts are on average about 31% CPU.

  The results, I found the task manager has led to some research on Google, which in turn led me to want to run adksetup.exe (Windows Assessment and Deployment Kit) in the hope of discovering if a particular driver is causing the problem. (Various threads on the internet point to what is the way to go).

  However, after downloading adksetup.exe, when I try to launch it I get the initial screen of Toolbox and then 'assessment of Windows and the deployment for Windows 8.1 Kit has stopped working ". (Verification of the solution finally gives the only option to "Close the program").  Similarly, I have now discovered that if I try to look at the properties of the computer, i.e. start > right click on computer > left click on properties, I get "Windows Explorer has stopped working". Do more research on Google I find sometimes I get "Internet Explorer has stopped working" sometimes (Chrome is ok).  More out of curiosity than anything specific I ran AMD VISION Engine Control Center after right click on the desktop and ended with 'Catalyst Control Center; The host Application has stopped working".

  So before going any further, does anyone have any ideas what's happening?   I do not understand the problems 'has stopped working"in safe mode, but the high utilization of the processor with System Idle Process around 98% is still there.  It appears so that I can run adksetup.exe in safe mode while this would be the way to proceed and continue to try to tackle the problem of CPU?

  For the record, some of the things I've done along the way include update of Windows, updating drivers, running the file system (no violation of integrity) checker, a regular chkdsk ("CHKDSK discovered free space marked allocated in the master file table (MFT) bitmap. Correcting errors in the volume bitmap. Windows has made corrections to the file system").  Swapped the only module memory 4GB 2 x 1 GB modules I had to hang out, all the symptoms remained 4 GB then reinstalled.

  Thanks for the tips

  HP g6-1202sa Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit

  4 GB of ram

  AMD A4 - 3300M APU with graphics Radeon (TM) HD 1900 MHz

  523 GB of free disk space

  WE

  Since the observer event logs, these are some of the problems

  Software connection of 1 hp mgr is damaged and needs to be installed.  There are literally hundreds (or even thousands of these errors)

  Cannot find the description for the ID of the event source hpCMSrv 5. Either the component that triggers this event is not installed on your local computer or the installation is corrupted. You can install or repair the component on the local computer.

  The failing application name: hpConnectionManager.exe, version: 4.1.23.1, time stamp: 0x4df7dbef

  2 - the description for event ID 0 in source AdvancedSystemCareService8 is not found. Remove

  3 - Media center is corrupt (updated)

  The description for event ID 0 in source MCUpdate is not found. Either the component that triggers this event is not installed on your local computer or the installation is corrupted.

  Workouts 4 - sky are corupt

  Session "SkyDriveSessionName" was able to start with the following error: 0xC0000022

  5 - the description for the ID of the event source BtFilter 26 is not found

  6 - hundreds of Cvhsvc.exe is a part of the virtualization Client Microsoft Microsoft Office Service... Errors

  The description for event ID 100 from source CVHSVC is not found.

  7. the description of event ID 3057 source client Application Virtualization Client cannot be found.

  As you can see there are at least a dozen of them which are probably related to the high utilization of the processor.

  The drivers are not updated (Bet you checked in the Manager device or with a sweeper driver as app)

  To be honest I don't see how SFC returned no breach of integrity account required to this type of problems.

  It might just be easier to re - install win 7, but I'm happy to help anyway

• High CPU after 10.11.3 at 10.11.4 upgrade

  Use El Capitan successfully for several months, 10.11.1 to 10.11.3 migration. However, the upgrade to 10.11.4 led to relatively stable high CPU.

  In particular, I see process launchd (about 75%), UserEventAgent (70%) and mds_stores (30%) CPU consumption at that rate there essentially all the time, the % overall slowed down when do nothig is about 45% - therefore on an end of 2014 retina iMac 27 inches with Fusion drive. Despite this, everything works still with reasonable performance, probably because there is still spare CPU capacity.

  Looking at the Console log, I see a lot of

  29/03/2016 18:17:01.002 com.apple.CDScheduler [49]: * LOG MESSAGE QUOTA EXCEEDED - SOME MESSAGES OF THIS PROCESS HAVE BEEN LAID *.

  29/03/2016 18:18:02.001 com.apple.CDScheduler [49]: * LOG MESSAGE QUOTA EXCEEDED - SOME MESSAGES OF THIS PROCESS HAVE BEEN LAID *.

  29/03/2016 18:19:03.002 com.apple.CDScheduler [49]: * LOG MESSAGE QUOTA EXCEEDED - SOME MESSAGES OF THIS PROCESS HAVE BEEN LAID *.

  29/03/2016 18:20:04.002 com.apple.CDScheduler [49]: * LOG MESSAGE QUOTA EXCEEDED - SOME MESSAGES OF THIS PROCESS HAVE BEEN LAID *.

  It's be connected at intervals of a minute or so, although I don't see any referenced messages.

  Removed some of the programs began and eliminated some of the agents launched (I think) and also re-installed from the recovery partition, but the problem is still there.

  Someone at - it watched questions along these lines?

  Would appreciate any suggestions.

  Try each of them in order. A test to see if the computer works properly:

  1. Reset the PRAM
  2. Reset the controller (SMC) system management
  3. Start the computer in Safe Mode, and then restart normally. It's slower than a standard home.
  4. Repair the disk by booting to the recovery HD immediately after the chime press keys control and R that the Utility Menu appears. Choose disk utility and click on the button continue. Select the withdrawal (usually Macintosh HD) volume entry of the list to one side.  Click first aid button in the toolbar. Hold the button brings up. Disk utility and return in the Utility Menu. Restart the computer from the Apple Menu.
  5. Reinstall OS X by booting from the Recovery HD using the command and R keys. When the Utility Menu appears, select reinstall OS X and then click continue.
  6. Download and install updated Combo OS X El Capitan 10.11.4.

• Re: Satellite L650D - 16Q - high CPU temperature

  I have the high temperature of my CPU when im play is not on the next screen
  http://ImageShack.us/f/708/Temperatura.PNG/

  When I play the temperature is around _73_ Celsius and _63 percent _, cooler _80 percent _ speed
  The temperature rises immediately.
  I worry about this.
  I bought my satellite 2 months ago, I don't know what is recommended temperature and fan speed. How to reduce the temperature? My fan does not?

  In my opinion there is no reason to panic. When you play games, it makes sense that the CPU and GPU must offer more performance and these hardware components will produce also more heat. Sensors on the motherboard to register this heat and fans will be auto activated to operate with a higher speed and a hard recovery.

  This is nothing unusual. 73 for the processor temperature is certainly not the critical temperature level.

• DAQmx read results 2 ms/s in high CPU usage

  I have an application that reads the 32 channels of 2 ms/s analog input signals, at the same time. The actual hardware will be: SMU-8135 Win7, chassis SMU-1071, 2 x SMU-6368 (16 channels). The SMU-two 6368 will provide 32 channels data acquisition.

  I don't have the material at the moment, but I've been estimate the processor on the alternative configurations needs, because I have concerns about the use of the CPU to data acquisition high speed. Two alternative configurations are:

  (1) SMU-8133 (quad core) WinXP, SMU-1062 q, PXI-6133.

  (2) PXI-8106 (dual-core) WinXP, PXI-6133, PXI-1042.

  Note: PXI-6133 supports high speed HAVE 2 ms/s, at the same time.

  I wrote a simple continuous data acquisition software to allow me to compare the CPU usage. The sample rate and the number of channels are configurable. What I found is:

  (1) at low sampling frequency, for example 100 kech. / s, the CPU usage is minimal on both configurations (bicoeur or image), regardless of the number of channels is 1 or 8. The reading of the CPU was about 1-4%

  (2) at high sampling frequency, for example 2 ms/s, what is the number of channels used, either 1 or 8, the CPU utilization was 50% for dual core and 25% for the quad core, IE. a full core has been fully utilized.

  (3) the passage of the low use of the processor (<5%) to="" high="" cpu="" usage="" (="">45%) increases when the sampling rate is rather steep and shows interesting channel-dependence (note the following has been achieved with a PXI-8106 controller, dual-core).

  • @1 channel, it happened between 950 to 970 k
  • @2 channels, it happened between 470 to 480 k
  • @4 channels, it happened between 230 to 240 k,.
  • @8 channels, it happened between 120 to 130 k.

  This model reminds me of buffer length related question but I double checked a sufficient length of the buffer was used. He suggested also, surprising a few traffic jams occurred when the amount of data increases up to certain level.

  My question is, is this a problem with this particular card (PXI-6133) or driver DAQmx (9.5.5f4). How the problem is when I'm doing an acquisition of 32 channels?

  For your information, I have attached the benchmarking software.

  Thank you!

  Donghui Yin

  I followed this example code (see link below) and used based on events DAQmx, now the excessive CPU utilization problem has been resolved. Playback from the CPU is now less than 10 percent, while it could be 50% (in the case of dual-core) or 25% (case of hearts) at the same sample rate and number of channels.

  http://zone.NI.com/DevZone/CDA/EPD/p/ID/5911