Question of dynamic VPN

Similar Questions

• IOS: Dynamic VPN with l2tp/CVPN Client

  It is possible to configure a router (12.3.9a) to accept dynamic vpn through MS l2tp (XP sp1) and Cisco VPN client (4.0.5 for XP) at the same time?

  without the line 'crypto map vpn client client authentication list userauthen' 2 vpn clients work but cisco vpn client does not request a user name and password.

  with this line, the l2tp MS client fails.

  Here is my config:

  AAA authentication login userauthen local

  AAA authorization groupauthor LAN

  !

  VPDN enable

  !

  VPDN-group pino

  ! Default L2TP VPDN group

  accept-dialin

  L2tp Protocol

  virtual-model 1

  Force-local-chap

  no authentication of l2tp tunnel

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 100

  BA 3des

  md5 hash

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 5000

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  isakmp encryption key * address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  !

  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group pino

  key *.

  domain test.test

  pool pool_cvpn

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac set_3des

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac set_l2tp

  transport mode

  !

  dynamic-map crypto CVPN 20

  Set transform-set set_l2tp

  match the address l2tp_acl

  !

  crypto dynamic-map CVPNN 10

  Set transform-set set_3des

  !

  crypto map vpn client client authentication list userauthen

  crypto map client-vpn isakmp authorization list groupauthor

  address of card crypto configuration vpn-client client answer

  Crypto map 10-client vpn ipsec-isakmp dynamic CVPN

  Crypto map 20-customer vpn ipsec-isakmp dynamic CVPNN

  Thank you

  Davide

  Hi David

  Although it is a L2TP/dynamic IPSEC, you must have authentication configured for dynamic clients.

  hope this link can clear things...

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00801dddbb.shtml

  regds

  Prem

• Cisco ASA and dynamic VPN L2L Fortigate configuration

  I met a problem recently with an ASA 5510 (7.0) and a bunch of Fortigate 50 (3.0 MR7). The ASA is the hub and Fortigates are rays with a dynamic public IP.

  I followed this document on the site Web of Cisco (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a00805733df.shtml) to set up my ASA and the parameters passed to my counterparts to set up their Fortigates.

  However, the ASA journal reveals that attemtps Fortigate connection always tried with DefaultRAGroup before falling back to DefaultL2LGroup and finally died. Experience with putting in place a dynamic VPN between Cisco and Fortigate someone? Which could not fail at each end? Here's a typical piece of error log ASA. The ASA is currently having a static VPN tunnel and a site-2-client VPN in two groups by default.

  6. January 10, 2011 20:58:45 | 713905: Group DefaultL2LGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, P1 = relay msg sent to the WSF MM
  5. January 10, 2011 20:58:45 | 713201: Group = DefaultL2LGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, in double Phase 1 detected package.  Retransmit the last packet.
  6. January 10, 2011 20:58:45 | 713905: Group DefaultL2LGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, P1 = relay msg sent to the WSF MM
  5. January 10, 2011 20:58:45 | 713201: Group = DefaultL2LGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, in double Phase 1 detected package.  Retransmit the last packet.
  6. January 10, 2011 20:58:41 | 713905: Group DefaultL2LGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, P1 = relay msg sent to the WSF MM
  5. January 10, 2011 20:58:41 | 713201: Group = DefaultL2LGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, in double Phase 1 detected package.  Retransmit the last packet.
  4. January 10, 2011 20:58:39 | 713903: Group = DefaultL2LGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, ERROR, had decrypt packets, probably due to problems not match pre-shared key.  Abandonment
  5. January 10, 2011 20:58:39 | 713904: Group = DefaultL2LGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, received the package of Mode main Oakley encrypted with invalid payloads, MessID = 0
  6. January 10, 2011 20:58:39 | 713905: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, WARNING, had decrypt packets, probably due to problems not match pre-shared key.  User switching to the tunnel-group: DefaultL2LGroup
  5. January 10, 2011 20:58:39 | 713904: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, received the package of Mode main Oakley encrypted with invalid payloads, MessID = 0
  4. January 10, 2011 20:58:33 | 713903: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, error: cannot delete PeerTblEntry
  3. January 10, 2011 20:58:33 | 713902: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, Removing peer to peer table has no, no match!
  6. January 10, 2011 20:58:33 | 713905: Group DefaultRAGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, P1 = relay msg sent to the WSF MM
  5. January 10, 2011 20:58:33 | 713201: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, in double Phase 1 detected package.  Retransmit the last packet.
  6. January 10, 2011 20:58:25 | 713905: Group DefaultRAGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, P1 = relay msg sent to the WSF MM
  5. January 10, 2011 20:58:25 | 713201: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, in double Phase 1 detected package.  Retransmit the last packet.
  6. January 10, 2011 20:58:21 | 713905: Group DefaultRAGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, P1 = relay msg sent to the WSF MM
  5. January 10, 2011 20:58:21 | 713201: Group = DefaultRAGroup, IP = 116.230.243.205, in double Phase 1 detected package.  Retransmit the last packet.
  5. January 10, 2011 20:58:19 | 713904: IP = 116.230.243.205, encrypted packet received with any HIS correspondent, drop

  Yes, sounds about right. He will try to match with the DefaultRAGroup first, and when you know that it's a dynamic IPSec in LAN-to-LAN, it will be

  then back to the DefaultL2LGroup, because he doesn't know if the VPN Client or L2L again when he is contacted fist as they are connecting from dynamic IP peer.

  You must ensure that your L2L tunnel-group by default has been configured with the corresponding pre-shared key.

  Assuming that you have configured the dynamic map and assign to the card encryption.

  Here is an example of configuration where ASA has a static and peripheral ip address pair has dynamic IP:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00807ea936.shtml

  Hope that helps.

• Truly dynamic VPN, is this possible?

  Consider the situation where you have ASA 'central' hosting of several l2l IPSec tunnels.

  Apart from users uses Anyconnect to connect to ASA and is granted routing profile they choose.

  Y at - it * any way * to use only group AnyConnect, that would create dynamically need VPN access list basic example ldap group info.

  Small example:

  L2L tunnel A specific tunnel and used Anyconnect Group A, only users on ldap goup XYA are allowed

  L2L tunnel B has specific tunnel and used Anyconnect Group B, only users on ldap goup XYB are allowed

  If the end user has the right to connect groups A and B (belongs to groups XYA XYB), can it be managed dynamic?

  Case of the real world holds hundreds of split-tunnel, it is a simple example and question, if this is possible or not?

  JRA-

  Hi Jari

  I'm not quite sure, I understand what you want to achieve, but I think that you should be able to do using a single group and a set of rules DAP.

  That is a rule that says that 'if the user is a member of the XYA then apply ACLs A', another rule "If the user is a member of the XYB then apply acl B" etc.

  See

  HTH

  Herbert

• Political dynamic VPN access and access to the administration

  Hi all

  I'm testing a scenerio with an ASA 5520 so he could authenticate VPN users against and an environment Active Directory more access to management as well. I created a dynamic access on the ASA policy indicating that, if you are a member of the Active Directory 'Managment' group continue. I have chagned the DefaultAccessPolicy to "Finish." With it, users could not connect VPN because they are not a member of this group, but access to manage the ASA is allowed due to this policy.

  Is there a way through the use of dynamic access policies I can afford access to the administration (SSH, AMPS, etc.) by matching to membership in a group and will allow normal users to VPN in successfully, but not give them access to the management of the ASA?

  I just try this but it seems that I should be able to swing that?

  Thaks in advance.

  Hello

  You can try to apply the DAP and configure the filter ACL network. allowing only the protocols you want to that they can access.

  Kind regards

  Anisha

  P.S.: Please mark this thread as answered if you feel that your query is resolved. Note the useful messages.

• Dynamic VPN for a SAA with IP tunnel

  Hi community.

  Can someone please send a simple configuration for a SAA with dynamic IP connected to an ASA with a static IP address. I read some manuals and how to. But neither works with my ASA. All the how to are older versions of software, I use softwareversion 9.0.

  Do you need a config tunnel and political group for the ASA for dynamic IP and static IP ASA.

  Thanks in advance and greetings patrick

  Hello

  Maybe that this document could help or have you already had a look?

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_tech_note09186a0080bc7d13.shtml

  It gives simple examples of HUB with a static public IP address and 2 sites of TALKING with dynamic public IP address. Cisco ASA and Cisco router:

  In my work I rarely run in the situation where I have to configure VPNS between sites, while the other site has a dynamic IP address. Although the situations that I met were conducted using an ASA5505 as a hardware network Extension Mode client.

  I should really lab installation documents a day before me also.

  -Jouni

• Auditorio IKE mode in a dynamic VPN tunnel

  What is the mode of IKE negotiation in a dynamic group of VPN tunnel, i.e. of DefaultL2LGroup? Hand, aggressive or AutoDetect? Thank you!

  Ok.

  I guess that you are looking for the following command.

  card crypto [TAG] [SEQ #] defined phase 1-mode aggressive

  Kind regards

  Anisha

  PS: Please mark this thread solved if your query is resolved.

• Question of dynamic access Cisco policy

  I have my cisco ASA pulling active directory. So far I have only deployed vpn without client for intranet access. But iin test I have cisco anyconnect vpn works also from active directory. I would like to give different levels of access to the anyconnect vpn. I've been messing around with dynamic access policies. However, when I create a new policy and map it to the users group in the AD and the access network list, then I click Finish on the dfltaccesspolicy, I can connect is no longer in the clientlessvpn. I gave my DAP policy a priority 2147483647 I read was the highest, but it still does not work. What I am doing wrong?

  Thanks in advance for your help

  Awesome Neal!

  Thanks for sharing about how you solved your problem with others is the idea of this great forum.

  Please mark this message as answered.

  Have a good.

• Question of dynamic values prompt OBIEE!

  I'm new to OBIEE. I need help, and I'm stuck in the following scenario.
  
  How can I specify a dynamic range of values to display in the dashboard line?
  I mean when the user clicks on a message of solicitation that it should be able to see certain values that need to be generated dynamically. For example, this year.
  If the user connects to today, he should be able to see the values of the year 2012, 2013 and 2014.
  If the user connects to the next year, he should be able to see the values of the year 2013, 2014 and 2015.
  
  Thanks in advance!
  Ajay.

  Hello

  Fast, select SQL is reflected in the values of choice list for the year.

  Type this in SQL results.

  SELECT "calendar". "" Calendar year "OF"SH"WHERE"calendar. " "" Calendar year "between YEAR (CURRENT_DATE) and (YEAR (CURRENT_DATE) + 3)

  Let me know if you have any questions.

  Thank you

  Ménard

  Published by: Ménard Hussain on 7 November 2012 21:19

• Question of dynamic region ADF (jdev 11.1.1.4)

  Hello
  
  I use dynamic region ADF by "Elements of Navigation order" whose action is related to a method of view range bean to set the "taskFlowId" used by "af:region".
  
  I have two 'Navigation command elements' each representing a taskflow bounded on the page (JSPX). One of the taskflow has a page fragment (such as default activity) with the only active filter af:table fell on it.
  
  Questions:
  (1) when I pass between the "Element in Navigation order" links the workflow with af:table filter is not cleared which came in her previous visit. And the table is filtered with his previously entered filter criteria. I want my table to load in the same State without applying the previous filter between the navigation.
  
  (2) even with the visible previously entered filter criteria to revisit the workflow (with af:table), research without erasing the persistent filter gives me the error "try to define a parameter name that does not intervene in the SQL: vc_temp_1.
  
  Grateful for your help!
  
  Kind regards
  Pramod Gujjeti

  Hello

  the problem is there for some time, please look at:
  {: identifier of the thread = 906415}
  {: identifier of the thread = 2157454}

  You have my oracle support? Then you can search for bug 11652292 "Readmises BOUNDED TASK FLOWS FAILED for TABLE FILTERING".

  I don't know exactly yet, but I think that you must call a method which erase the viewCriterias for your view object (the object view for your table). Your method must call oracle.jbo.server.ViewObjectImpl.clearViewCriterias (). Expose the method as a public method (so you can drag and drop of datacontrol to a view or controller) and make that the default activity in the taskflow.

  Martin

• Question of P2P VPN One Way

  Hello support,

  I'm having a problem with a P2P VPN. Our side is a Cisco ASA 5512 and peripheral supplier is a firewall of some sort. When launch us the VPN from Cisco ASA end 5512, the VPN is fine without problem and communication goes on both sides. If I take the VPN down and then he tries to launch the VPN, I never see same traffic come into our firewall, and it does not come to the top. When we do a trace of their inside network inside our network (when you start their end), the trace goes to some edge devices at their end and outside the ISP. There are actually a few public IPs in the traceroute, but when launch us the VPN to our end and before you run a trace on their end, these same public IPs do not show in the trace.

  It almost seems like they have a device on their end which does not correctly handle the NAT or SHEEP for private subnets. Does this sound accurate?

  Just to remind, when launch us the VPN, look clean and only private IPs see traces on both ends. When they start the VPN, traffic never hit our firewalls and traces of their late show public IPs on the route.

  From now on, we keep a ping running to keep alive the VPN, but it's not ideal. Here, any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Hey John,

  are you sure that when they start their home subnet traffic, it is hitting the vpn.

  Please ask them to run debug crypto since their end and if the first protocol udp 500 is even sent to their end.

  Now, in order to follow the tunnel, you can configure SLA monitoring on the ASA:

  Please follow the discussion below to set up the same:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/discussion/11012751/IP-SLA-monitor-VPN

• Question of redundancy VPN l2l using 2811 as endpoint devices

  I have a new implementation of VPN L2L passes using two 2811 s than VPN terminal devices. I'll try to use the HSRP address between the public interfaces of both routers as VPN peer address. The problem that I found during the test is that the tunnel will become active and debugs watch the HSRP address as an invalid address to form the tunnel. Have a work-around, or a better plan for redundancy on peering address using similar devices? Thanks in advance.

  Take a look at this doc about IOS IPSec HA.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/security/configuration/guide/sec_vpn_ha_enhance_ps6922_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html#wp1039849

• Question of WRV210 VPN RVS4000

  Hello all,.

  I have a client configuration with a WRV210 VPN router wireless home internet (cox cable) and a VPN RVS4000 router at his office (comcast cable internet).

  VPN has been in service for about 6 months, with the occasional drop-outs requiring a reboot of the two endpoints to re-establish the VPN.

  The WRV210 home recently 'died', requiring a replacement. The client is the swap itself and called for assistance to small businesses (?) where they walked him through the router configuration.  Since this morning when I checked, the VPN is connected, but I can't ping between the internal interface on the DESKTOP to the internal interface on the HOUSE.

  I'm deleting the entry IPSEC on the RVS4000 (apparently no option to remove an entry on the WRV210!) and the deactivation/creation of new entry on the WRV210.

  Any thoughts out there on how to make this diagnosis?

  Kind regards

  John Knapp

  Cisco SMB Select

  Hello

  I would watch your setting on the tunnel, you can check the LAN IP local and remote do they read X.X.X.0

  I would like to know if it is the problem, if it is not remembered the HWC to solve the problem

• Simple Question on 877 VPN functionality

  Where can I find namely how the router throughput is affected when there are configured VPN Tunnels? or if there is someone who can give me this info... I have just didn? find it in the data sheet. Thank you

  Refer to page 61

  http://www.Cisco.com/application/PDF/en/us/guest/NetSol/ns171/c649/ccmigration_09186a008073a0c5.PDF

  871 and 877 have the same architecture.

  or

  http://www.Cisco.com/Web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/vpn_performance_eng.PDF

• Question of access VPN Tunnel

  I was wondering if there is a way to allow only one side of a vpn tunnel to create connections?

  Example I have a vpn tunnel going to a site with servers that I manage. I want to be able to get on the servers (via rdp, ssh, etc.) and allow the return of traffic but I don't want the servers to be able to reach me (via rdp, ssh, etc.).

  Any ideas?

  I use a cisco ASA5540

  Hello

  You have alteast 2 possibilities

  • You can configure a filter ACL on the L2L VPN connection VPN
    • Long-term a solution a little messier. Mainly due to the ACL filter of VPN L2L having a slightly different configuration than the usual ACL interface format
  • You can turn off (if not already disabled) feature that allows to bypass your 'outer' interface ACL all traffic entering from a VPN connection. In this way, you can control incoming VPN L2L with ACL 'outside' interface traffic.
    • connections are allowed as any other Internet connection in the "outside" interface ACL if its fairly simple to manage.

  If this is something you are looking for I can tell you how to get to one of them.

  -Jouni