queue exception thanks to another user access

Similar Questions

• ORA-33288: another user has inconsistent access to the analytic workspace

  Gurus
  
  A customer of our meeting suite error when make action (refresh the data) of the responsibility for the EBiz project portfolio analysis
  
  # # 0 in detail java.sql.SQLException: ORA-34344: FPA analytic workspace. FPAPJP is not attached.
  ORA-06512: at the 'APPS '. FPA_UTILITIES_PVT', line 129
  ORA-06512: at the 'APPS '. FPA_PROCESS_PVT', line 2467
  ORA-33272: FPA analytic workspace. Cannot open FPAPJP.
  ORA-33288: another user has inconsistent access to the analytic workspace FPA. FPAPJP and the timeout has expired.
  ORA-06512: at line 1
  
  I searched the documentation of OLAP, metalink, google, but all simply suggest "Expect that the conflict is over.". We waited and asked their DBA to check active connections, but none has proven to help us.
  
  Issues related to the:
  ======
  1. how to avoid this error?
  2. How do I know the number of users / user information connected to the FPAPJP workspace?
  3. How can we close these sessions?
  
  Really appreciate your inputs.
  
  Thank you
  Charlene

  # 1, it seems that the process is trying to detach a workspace that is not attached. Just check in your code if you try off somewhere and work space is not attached.

  Thank you
  Brijesh

• I can't access our control panel user, I have recentley found another user named Ben on my pc in safe mode, I get blue screen

  I can't access the Control Panel on our user, I have recentley found another user named Ben on my pc in safe mode, I think I have a trojan or virus, I get a windows message have found another registry file

  I can't access the Control Panel on our user, I have recentley found another user named Ben on my pc in safe mode, I think I have a trojan or virus, I get a windows message have found another registry file

  Hello, tounsya,

  What antivirus do you use?  AVG, McAfee, BitDefender, Norton?

  http://www.howtogeek.com/HOWTO/Windows-Vista/disable-System-Restore-in-Windows-Vista/

  Turn off System Restore and download either of the following.

  Run a full scan to ensure that your system is not infected.

  Malicious software removal tool

  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/PC-Security/Malware-removal.aspx

  TrendMicro Housecall

  http://housecall.trendmicro.com/

• I just spent over 1.5 hrs with servThis client update is not available for this Apple ID either because it was bought by another user or the item has been refunded or cancelled. Thank you very much

  "This update is not available for this Apple ID either because it was bought by another user or the item has been refunded or cancelled."

  I can't update Flash or Iphone etc. I bought the Mac in a well-known Apple authorized store in Toronto, Ontario thank = you much, I tried to contact Adobe customer service after more than 1.5 hours was not able to help, so I'm here. Hello everyone. My first entry!

  Looks like you're not able to connect using Apple ID. If so, please work with the Apple support team.

  You can download the latest version of the flash player from Adobe Flash Player install for all versions

  Thank you.

• I bought Adobe Acrobat DC. We use it in a desktop environment. Is there a way to "TURN OFF" the concept of cloud for another user does not see a confidential pdf in their queue?

  Is there a way to "TURN OFF" the concept of cloud for another user does not see a confidential pdf in their queue?

  I tried to contact technical support to the 800-833-6687 but was put through several automatic guests and disconnected.

  Hi plumasca,

  Refer to this topic for help disable features/services online in Acrobat/Reader DC?

  Kind regards
  Nicos

• How can I create an another user to access the HR schema data

  I am new to Oracle and just downloaded the: 10 x e. I have connected as human resources and was able to modify data in tables.
  I created another user, then say ABC, when connected as SYS. But then I could not access the tables and the data even in human resources.
  
  I learned that every user has its own schema, but how do I create an another user to access the same tables, and the data I see in the Oracle DB?

  Log in as a user of the system (or sys as sysdba) and:
  create user identified by ;
  Grant connect, create session ;

  To see objects to a different schema from the database user must then obtain the privilege:

  Grant select on hr. à ;

• doc files locked by another user. Occurs when the laptop computer on the new Word documents opening.

  Just acquired a computer laptop and everything seemed to sync with SkyDrive and my desktop PC, except that the Word doc files will not open. Error message _ .doc is locked by another user. By selecting 'Open read-only' displays a different error message.

  All other types of files and doc files produced local seem to work well. I can access and open files on SkyDrive.com with both computers. docx files do not seem to be affected.

  The problem occurs only on my laptop. To access the files established by clicking on it in the local SkyDrive open Word (2010) with the error message (the file is locked by another user).

  Files open very well during the passage of SkyDrive.com (from mobile) and in all desktop scenarios. And can access the files on the desktop to the laptop via the network. The two computers configured in the same way of C:, D: (SkyDrive on this partition) and E:

  I can copy files over the network to the laptop E: partition and they access very well. Copy them to D:\SkyDrive (once the original has been removed and SkyDrive left) same problem occurs. Network's WiFi in the House.

  Does not occur with the new files created on laptop, the files in the root directory of the laptop (only subdir) skydrive and .docx files.

  I have updated the advanced settings of sharing and security on the two computers without success.

  All other types of files seem fine.

  Help appreciated.

  Stephen

  Greetings from the happy camper,

  Long process, simple solution. Thanks to Madeni K N for suggestions that lead to the solution.

  The drive letter has changed

  The temporary internet folder to E: and changed environment variables

  Moved temporary internet files to E:

  Without success

  The drive letter has changed back to D:

  Deleted from the temporary internet folder.

  Success!

  Checked E: temp internet files and notice a file called Content.Word

  Empty file 0 bytes

  Copied to the temporary internet folder in D: less Content.Word file

  Reset environment variables and temp internet folder to D:

  No problem! Yes team!

  Comments and suggestions appreciated.

  Thank you all

  Stephen

• Index of area of another user deleting - lack of permissions

  Hello

  My system user is able to delete a regular index to another user after you disable the DBA role. It's impossible, but the deletion of a domain created by the same user index.

  SELECT * FROM USER_SYS_PRIVS;

  USERNAME

  PRIVILEGE

  ADMIN_OPTION

  ------------------------------ ---------------------------------------- ------------

  SYSTEM	SELECT ANY DICTIONARY	NO.
  SYSTEM	RUN A PROCEDURE	NO.
  SYSTEM	DROP TABLESPACE	NO.
  SYSTEM	GLOBAL QUERY REWRITE	NO.
  SYSTEM	CREATE A MATERIALIZED VIEW	NO.
  SYSTEM	ALTER ANY TABLE	NO.
  SYSTEM	CREATE TABLE	NO.
  SYSTEM	ALTER TABLESPACE	NO.
  SYSTEM	CREATE TABLESPACE	NO.
  SYSTEM	UNLIMITED TABLESPACE	YES
  SYSTEM	REMOVE ANY MATERIALIZED VIEW	NO.
  SYSTEM	SELECT ANY TABLE	NO.
  SYSTEM	REMOVE ANY INDEX	YES

  DDL, used for the creation of index (running under the user star1)

  Start

  ctx_ddl.create_preference ('SUBSTRING_PREF', 'BASIC_WORDLIST');

  ctx_ddl.set_attribute ('SUBSTRING_PREF', 'SUBSTRING_INDEX', 'TRUE');

  end;

  CREATE INDEX 'FTXTINDEX101' ON 'FACT_CHARGE' ('SAVEC_RECONCILING_USERS') indextype is ctxsys.context parameters ("wordlist SUBSTRING_PREF MEMORY 50 M SYNC (ON COMMIT)");

  create table test (x varchar (20))

  create index test_index on test ('X')

  Now, when I run the following under system, I get the error mentioned in the lower part:

  role play all except DBA;

  Drop index star1.test_index;

  index STAR1T. TEST_INDEX dropped.

  Drop index star1. FTXTINDEX101

  Error report:

  SQL error: ORA-01031: insufficient privileges

  01031 00000 - "insufficient privileges".

  * Cause: An attempt was made to change the user name or password

  without the privilege appropriate. This error also occurs if

  trying to install a database without the need for employment

  access privileges.

  When Trusted Oracle is configure in DBMS MAC, this error may occur

  If the user has been granted the privilege necessary for a higher label

  that the connection is active.

  * Action: Ask the database to perform the operation or grant administrator

  the required privileges.

  For users Trusted Oracle get this error, well that granted the

  the privilege that is suitable for the top label, ask the database

  administrator to grant the privilege to the appropriate label.

  --

  If I let the system use its DBA roles, that the index is deleted. I struggle to identify approval which is induced by the DBA role and which allows to drop other indices of field system.

  Thanks for the tips,

  Radek

  PS. Oracle version information

  Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64 bit Production
  PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
  CORE 11.2.0.1.0 Production
  AMT for 64-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production

  NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production

  grant modify any index system;

• Document pages block for another user has the file open

  Hello

  I'm using Pages 5.6.2

  In our society, we begin using pages for the edition of our records. We use a shared network of synology to quickly access our files. It's a DS-209 + II.

  Now, we had several issues where a user still had a file open and open another file.

  My question: is it possible to have pages or finder or what ever tells me that the file is open by another user?

  I think something like Microsoft Word has set up: "the document is locked for editing by another user.

  Please let me know if there is a way to have this feature in place or to have a sort of work around.

  Thank you very much!

  N ° not a feature of the Pages, or configurable one or the other. The work is to use Word only (a safer bet), or an edit shared management of the users of the document will be closing their documents Pages and exit Pages to release the locks on files - when they are done with the document.

• Install VISTA SP2 - all my old documents are "locked by another user.

  I used Windows update to install the Vista SP2 and now all my existing documents came as "locked by another user", or in the case of older documentation and worksheets in read-only or corrupt.  The docs are very good, I can copy it to another machine and they work.  In addition, the file attributes are NOT marked read-only.  Any ideas?  I was going to cancel, but the restoration of the system shows no point of restoration before the update, even if I manually created a Saturday.

  Thanks in advance.

  Ted

  Hi tearnott,

  Thank you for using answers Forum.

  Have you tried creating a new user as suggested by Debbie?

  I found this on the desktop support site:
  http://Office.Microsoft.com/en-us/Word/HA011406121033.aspx

  If you cannot make changes to a document, your Word program cannot be enabled, the document can be locked for editing or protected by password, or you could try to modify a document or text in a protected form.

  Note   You cannot edit an open document in Word Viewer, but you can copy text to the Clipboard to paste into other applications.

  This command is not available because the document is locked for editing

  If you see the following message when you try to modify a document in Word 2003 or Word 2002: "this command is not available because the document is locked for editing" your Word program can not be activated. To check, follow these steps:

  • On the help menu, click Activate Product .

    If Word is enabled, a message tells you that the product has already been activated. If Word is not enabled, the Office Activation Wizard appears to guide you through the activation process.

  Note   You can open a Word document, even if the program is not activated, but you cannot use many commands and you cannot save the document.

  The document is locked for editing by another user

  If you see the following message when you try to modify a document in Word 2000 or Word 2002: "the document is locked for editing by another user," Word previously might have shut down improperly while the file is still open.

  The document can also be locked from editing if the original version of the document is already open, or if the document is shared over a network and another user opened. This applies to Word 2000, 2002 and 2003.

  Note   If the Group similar taskbar buttons is selected, the original version of the document can be open without your realizing it. Click Word in the Windows task bar to see the names of all the Word documents that are open.

  Your document is protected by a password

  If the owner of the protected the document with a password (including a blank password), you might be limited to read-only access unless you enter the password. If you forget or lose a password, you cannot change the document.

  This modification not allowed because the document is locked

  If you see this message at the bottom of the application window when you try to modify a document: "This unauthorized change because the document is locked," the document is protected by a restriction of amendment no changes (read only) or comments in Word 2003 (or a restriction of comments in Word 2002 and Word 2000). The author of the document to restrict editing features to protect the Document. Menu commands may also be unavailable, depending on the permissions granted to your by the author of the document.

  Note   When you open a document protected by Information Rights Management (IRM) in Word 2003, you might have permission to view the document but not to change it. When you open the document, the Office shared workspace pane opens by default on the right side of the application window. In the task pane, click View My permissions to see your permissions.

  I hope this helps. Chris
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Another user has modified the line containing oracle.jbo.Key primary key

  Hello

  In jdev 12 c

  I have a jsf page in a BTF, and there is a display of master(A:readonly table)-detail(B1:readonly table)-detail(B2:editable form) this page

  The (readonly table) B1 and B2 (editable form) are created on the same data control. There is no other layout compicated or functions on this page.

  The B2 (editable form) was based on a VO whose id is a type of DBSequence, and the new value has been created by a database trigger.

  I put

  All the columns that are updated by a database trigger or a PL/SQL call, are enabled for "Refersh on Insert" (for the case of the insertion) or "Refresh update" (for the case of update) or both in the entity object xml file.

  But when I submit/validate the page (form B2), the error msg 'another user has changed the line containing oracle.jbo.Key primary key' was always held randonly.

  And after the error msg, I can commit the data successfully by press the button validate again.

  How can I solve this problem?

  Thank you.

  The problem is that you use the pl/sql code. It is run out of the box. When a change is made in a row in this way, the framework removes upward, neither knowing that the change was done rightly and throws an error message.

  The code (which I copied from the other thread for reference) intercepts the error and re executs the lock in the case of the specific error.

  /*** customizing locking management:

  * Because attribute values can change 'outside' ADF standard life cycle,

  * when optimistic locking executes, the exception "Another User Changed the Row" is thrown.

  * In this case, we execute locking again, ignoring the exception

  */

  public void lock()

  {

  try

  {

    super.lock();

  } catch (oracle.jbo.RowInconsistentException e)

  {

    if (e.getErrorCode().equals("25014"))

    {

    super.lock();

    }

    else throw e;

  }

  }

  


  Timo

• ADF: addition of the JSF error message: another user has modified the line containing oracle.jbo.Key [185 primary key].

  When you call the function DB. The function performs its operation, but shows an exception. In JDev 11.1.2.3

  And there is not another user. I'm testing alone.

  ADF: addition of the JSF error message: another user has modified the line containing oracle.jbo.Key [185 primary key].

  oracle.jbo.RowInconsistentException: Houston-25014: another user has modified the line containing oracle.jbo.Key [185 primary key].

  The problem is that the function db has a commit and my code also. However the db function called once in a case.

  Thanks a lot for your help.

• One more time: Houston-25014: the record has been changed by another user. Please try again.

  Hello

  JDev 11.1.2.4

  I have a workflow where I execute with params VO, and then navigate to a view activity. On this page fragment, I click on a button that calls a PL/SQL procedure in the module of the application. The proceduce updates a row in the table. After this method call, I navigate to the same run with params.

  Execute with params-> view activity method-> call-> Execute with params (the app module method)

  But I have an exceptional:

  oracle.jbo.RowInconsistentException < DCBindingContainer > < reportException > [2669]: Houston-25014: the record has been changed by another user. Please try again.

  at oracle.jbo.server.OracleSQLBuilderImpl.doEntitySelectForAltKey(OracleSQLBuilderImpl.java:1078)

  at oracle.jbo.server.BaseSQLBuilderImpl.doEntitySelect(BaseSQLBuilderImpl.java:552)

  at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.doSelect(EntityImpl.java:8311)

  at oracle.jbo.server.EntityImpl.populate(EntityImpl.java:6975)

  In the log, I see the error.

  Compare entity < EntityImpl > < compare > [2305] has no attribute Addr1

  < EntityImpl > < compare > [2306] original value: COURTUPD

  Target value < EntityImpl > < compare > [2307]: COURTUPDfewfew

  The update in the procedure updates this field. The procedure performs validation, I made the call.

  I suspected that the case of ghost ADF so I put update on update for this field, but it does not work.

  Any idea on who is the user who changes my file without telling me?

  Thank you

  You have something in your entity that has changed.  Call rollback on your transaction module app before executeWithParams put it in a clean condition.

• Control user access to reports in vROPs

  Hello

  I noticed that in vRealize operations Manager, we can say whether allow us a user to view or not (models + those generated) reports page, but I want to know if there is a way to show only some of them about the permissions of the user to the object whose report was generated on.

  I also have a user who has the right to access an object (for example a vCenter). By my Admin account, I generated a report on this vCenter. I connected with my test user account, and I did not see the report generated, even it was generated on a vCenter that I have access to, but it does not show because it was generated by another user, and the report is not shared.

  Any idea? I hope that I was clear. Thank you very much.

  Unlike the dashboards, you cannot share the views and reports. You can only export the model and import it into the user account.

• What "unmapped user access" for NFS share in Windows Server 2008 R2?

  In the beginning, I followed this Youtube video to set up an NFS share in Windows Server 2008 R2:

  https://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=BQ8Q_vsiksg

  Please note that the default option to allow to access Unix unmapped user is not changed (to about 1 min 57 sec).

  Then I found another article at http://www.vmwarearena.com/2012/07/create-nfs-datastore-for-esx-in-windows.html

  But in this article, I like to select allow anonymous access (instead of allow access Unix unmapped user).

  So who is correct?  Or both are correct (which means that this 'unmapped user access' is not serious)?

  And why should we have to allow root access (in the NFS share permissions dialog box)?  What a security risk?

  Thanks in advance.

  Have you tried to run through the steps taken from the blog of VMware?

  How to enable NFS on Windows 2008 and currently at ESX | Insider - Articles from VMware VMware support

  Also, there are 3 KB articles to know in case of potential problems

  1. http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1004490

  2. http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1003967

  3. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753302 (WS.10) .aspx

  Noting in particular this section

  Share the folder of Windows for NFS

  To share the folder of Windows for NFS:

  1. Right click on the local folder you want to share via NFS.
  2. Click NFS share.
  3. Type the name for the share. For example, NFS-VMFS01.
  4. Delete to allow anonymous access.
  5. Click on permissions.
  6. Change the type of access in reading + writing and select allow root Access.