Receptive scale not exceeding 100% of the actual size

I have put in place a sensible scaling but do not want the animation to exceed more than 100% of the original size, which

is 1024 x 768px. As images become pixcellated. Can anyone advise on where I can add a specific rule / coding for this you?

I think that you can still set a constraint IE Max Width directly from step > properties panel, even if you set the sensitive scale. See capture.

Darrell

Tags: Edge Animate

Similar Questions

  • When I resize a photo to the web LR displays a very small image, not the actual size.

    When I resize a photo to the web LR displays a very small image, not the actual size that appears when I download on a website! ???

    Yes, it should work. It should show you exactly what the image will look like on normal, non-retine displays. At least if you have the resolution of your screen (in preferences-> display system) the value 'best for display '. In this case your computer exactly double the resolution.

    The link I posted above is for when you want to go further. In fact, he shows how to send images of different sizes to people looking at your site on the retina against those who seek to your site on normal screens. This will allow a still sharper image that people can get on a display to display. What it basically does is make their web browser asks a 1600 pixel image if only they are viewing on a screen high resolution while asking a low-resolution image 800 pixels for people using normal poster. This example uses all available pixels to choose the type of display. It takes just a bit of HTML and javascript coding. My main site done automatically like smugmug has this built already, but my blog site does not automatically so I had to code around it. This makes your images look amazing on the screens with high resolution such as on the screens of the retina and iPads.

  • How can I know the actual size of the type in a document of intent 'web '?

    I'm designing a document for iPhone 6plus pixels (1334 x 750) and need to know how translates the size. For example, when I call a text 30 PT., in the real world on the iPhone it's something much smaller than this... maybe 12 pt. This has something to with the number of pixels in the canvas... but how to convert?

    So, how to calculate the actual size of the type? I'm not good at math, I need to be told how to do it.

    For the output and display at 100%, InDesign defines the physical size of a pixel as "1/72, so the relationship between the print type size and displayed size of the iPhone is a simple report. For the iPhone6 72/326 Gets the relative size of the print to display discount, and 326/72 would be a multiplier. So to display 12pt type how it would print, set it to 54.4 pt (12 x 4.53). Or, to view a 1 inch by 1 inch square, resize it 453%.

    For the iPhone6 more the multiplier is 401/72 or 5.57

    Apple - iPhone 6 - technical specifications

  • I use mac mini.  Impossible to have the actual size of the work tools

    I'm not able to see the right size of tools... the circle I see on the screen, ddoube the actual size of the tool if I want a 10mm tool, I have the representation of a 1 cm tool...

    Most likely the size of the cursor system is something other than Normal.

    Go to System Preferences > accessibility > display and set the size of the cursor normal

  • Is there a way to find the actual size of the patterns as if all the HWM meter resetting tables?

    RDBMS Version: 11.2.0.3

    Platform: Oracle Linux 6.2

    The following query gives the size of patterns. But if there is no large table in these schemas that can be narrowed (IE. High tide being reset) then the actual size of these schemas will be less indicated below.

    Is there a way to find the size of a schema, as if the reset of the HWM in all tables in it?

    SQL > select master, sum (bytes/power (1024,3)) GB of dba_segments group by owner by Go order desc;

    OWNER                                  GB

    ------------------------------ ----------

    SBTOEL 1798.49951

    MIGPHS 228.772522

    SYS 22.4576416

    MIGSTATIC 4.79718018

    MIGRFS 2.39648438

    SYSTEME.523681641

    SYSMAN.277893066

    .

    .

    .


    Tom wrote:

    RDBMS Version: 11.2.0.3

    Platform: Oracle Linux 6.2

    The following query gives the size of patterns. But if there is no large table in these schemas that can be narrowed (IE. High tide being reset) then the actual size of these schemas will be less indicated below.

    Is there a way to find the size of a schema, as if the reset of the HWM in all tables in it?

    SQL > select master, sum (bytes/power (1024,3)) GB of dba_segments group by owner by Go order desc;

    OWNER                                  GB

    ------------------------------ ----------

    SBTOEL 1798.49951

    MIGPHS 228.772522

    SYS 22.4576416

    MIGSTATIC 4.79718018

    MIGRFS 2.39648438

    SYSTEME.523681641

    SYSMAN.277893066

    .

    .

    .

    given zero HWM does NOT change the amount of consumed disk space.

  • How can I get the actual size of an element in a photo?

    HI -.

    I was responsible for providing the actual measurements of the elements in the photographs. (There are 300 different photos, so I hope we find a pretty direct solution).

    My thought process was to open a photo, drag a bounding box around the document with the tool of the mark and read the precautions in the Info Panel.  But it does not work too well.


    In the sake of discussion, let's say I have a picture of a simple, plastic, badge/toy type 'happy meal '.  The insignia is actually 1 "squares.

    When I drag the box around it the Panel Info tells me that it measures W:3.37 "X H:3.37".

    ' ' I can't figure out how to get l: 1 "x H:1" to appear in the Info Panel.

    Dimensions of the photo show a massive 66 "x 44" at 72 dpi, and it seems that all 300 of these photos have the same dimensions, so one solution it should all.

    So the question is - using Photoshop, how to learn the physical measures of an element in a photo?

    I thought that this should be simple, but it turns out to be a real headache.

    Any expert TIA of entry.

    Josh

    You open the dialog box Image size (Ctrl Alt i or Cmd Opt i on a Mac).  Make sure that resampling is _not_ checked and the width is defined in inches.  Now do a little math:

    Size of your choice as 3.37 in. is indicated in your case, but you know that the actual size is 1 inch, multiply all that is in the field of the resolution of 3.37

    So if it's 72 resolution must be 242.64

    Make this change and OK it

    Drag another sample around the badge to check that the right size now.

    Don't forget: Re-sample must be disabled in the Image Size dialog box.

  • Why export dump shows at least that the actual size?

    Why export dump shows at least that the actual size?

    A large number of parameters must be taken into account. For example, for an empty table, only the DOF will be exported even if the segments are re-created when import. I'm not sure of what you are looking for and why, but a size of dump export has a little to do with the occupation of segments.
    I suggest you read the note * overview of original export and import utilities [61949.1 ID] * +, it is well explained.

    Nicolas.

  • What is the actual size of a varray (empty) in a folder?

    What is the actual size occupied by a varray (empty) in a folder?
    By example, if I create my table defined as:
    create or replace type XXX as object)
    ...
    myRefs VARRAY (10) ref (yyy)
    ...
    )
    create table xxx YYY;
    What is the actual size of the type XXX record when 'myRefs' is empty? For some reason, select data_length in the all_tab_cols where table_name = YYY always seems to come back 3K the length of the column myrefs... is that correct? Otherwise, what is the correct size?

    End a tad...

    The sizes of storage of the REF attributes are described here:

    [Design Considerations for REFs - size of storage of the REFs | http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/appdev.112/e11822/adobjdes.htm#i452226]

    The size of your REF attribute (or element, in your case) will depend on whether it is a primary key or generated by the system if it is extended or not, and it carries with it a hint of rowid-based. The overall size of your VARRAY attribute as it grows also will depend on whether you allow nulls to REF or not, but essentially will be the size of your time REF multiplied the number of items in your VARRAY (plus a small amount of storage for internal cleaning, both for the attribute for each constant element).

    You can try the VSIZE function as an appromixation...

    [Oracle® database language SQL - VSIZE reference | http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e17118/functions233.htm#SQLRF06162]

    It could be that useful...

    Gerard

  • Questions regarding the process of implementing container/control. How "parent of filling" and how to get the actual size of the control?

    I'm writing some UI component custom waterfalls. I went if the document several times and still have two questions:

    1. is it possible to adjust the width of the control to fill the container parent without specifying the number hardcoded in pixel? I see many example of code uses '768' as hardcoded width.

    2. I understand that the 'preferred size' could be ignored in some cases. Is it possible that I can get the actual size of the control on the screen programmatically?

    3. is there any signal was issued when a control container/finish covering all of its child nodes? How do I know what size of a control is finally decided?

    Thank you

    mdodd wrote:

    (1) you can use (QML)

    horizontalAlignment: HorizontalAlignment.Fill
    

    or (C++)

    myControl->setHorizontalAlignment(HorizontalAlignment::Fill);
    

    This will cause control occupy the entire width available to its parent. However, keep in mind you may have to use this property on all containers of parent to the node root to get the width of the full screen.

    As far as I KNOW simon_hain is located on the other two issues.

    ((2) & (3) I just dug around and you find LayoutUpdateHandler would do the job:

    https://developer.BlackBerry.com/Cascades/reference/bb__cascades__layoutupdatehandler.html

    mdodd answer on question 1) is correct.

    I can't believe they made a separate category for such a common task. Framework of stunts have had some serious consistency problems, that's what I feel.

    Thanks to all who have contributed to

  • When I open a pdf file using adobe default to 139% magnification. How to change the system, so it defaults to the actual size

    When I open a pdf file using adobe default to 139% magnification. How to change the system, so it defaults to the actual size

    Hi christian-laup70425339 .

    Please try this step: -.

    Acrobat > edit > Preferences > Page Display > under Default Layout & Zoom, set "Zoom in" on the value of your choice that you want.

    I would like to know if it works.

    Kind regards

    Christian

  • methods to follow the actual size of the thin disk

    In my environment, I'm above implement disk Thin Provisioning, for the purposes of the report, I need to monitor the actual size of the service end disc is there a tool or script that would help me to monitor disk size real of thin disc put into service.

    Get-VM VMNAME | Select name, usedspaceGB

    the usedspaceGB will give you the actual use.

  • printed page is not "actual size" even after clicking on the actual size

    I try to print forms from the IRS, but they are smaller than actual size printing.  Same problem with state tax forms.  I also clicked on the option "size" real and always get the same result.

    Sorry I couldn't respond sooner.  Thanks for the suggestion, but unfortunately it did not work. Finally, I went to printer manufacturer online support chat and the tech understood that it was a problem of the browser (Firefox) and opted for Google Chrome and now everything works fine.  Thanks for your effort to help.

  • Mac Photoshop CS6 - corresponding to 100% or shortened actual size?

    Just installed CS6, and my favorite Photoshop shortcut has disappeared! CTRL + Alt + 0 used to give me an overview in size of actual pixels (now apparently called 100% on the view menu), but the only indication of a shortcut in the menu is 'n', which does nothing. My research on the forums etc. indicate that this should be Cntrl + 1 or the old Ctrl + Alt + 0, but is clearly not working. Any ideas?

    Screen Shot 2015-02-23 at 17.05.25.png

    CTRL + 1 is the default shortcut. Are you sure that's not working?

    You can also change to Ctrl + Alt + 0 (or whatever you want) under Edition > keyboard shortcuts.

  • Is it possible to make the field of browser to fit the actual size of the screen of the device?

    In the HTML code of the web page, add the meta tag with the minimum scale set to 0

    content = "maximum scale = 10.0, minimum scale = 0, scalable user = yes" > "

    On the client side, we can reduce the web page using the method of the initial key.

    config.setProperty (BrowserFieldConfig.INITIAL_SCALE, new Float (value));

    In my case, the following meta tag wasn't there and if the initial scale option did not work after a certain limit. This is defined in the html code, we can scale to any value between the minimum/maximum defined scales.

    With that, my problem has been resolved.

    But, if you want to adapt it to the screen of the device, you will need to calculate the value of the scale to make it suited to the size of the screen in all devices regardless of the resolutions.

  • Do not put files to the exact size

    Hello

    I created Illustrator files to the exact size of InDesign pages I want to place on, so they're just right of pop. But they don't come out the same size. I do the command d for the place and then dragging the cursor with SHIFT pressed from the top left of the page to the bottom right of the page, but it never comes out not evenly.

    No idea what is happening?

    Thank you!

    It is the movement which makes the incorrect size.

    Move your cursor to the upper left corner of the InDesign file, and then click. The file will be placed at 100%.

Maybe you are looking for