methods to follow the actual size of the thin disk

Similar Questions

• Reservations of the thin disk growing cause SCSI?

  In the classic text on the origin of SCSI reservations, it is mentioned actions like adding new VMDK or remove snapshots them or expanding, but not permanent expansion / more and more thin disks. Are there reasons why the expansion of the thin disks does not cause this? If the size of the block VMFS is small that 1 MB the thin vmdk is developed probably quite often when the comments file system develops?

  It will take every time she needs to expand a SCSI reserve. Now, with the vsphere advanced locking mechanism a locking mechanism was relaxed if it shouldn\t be too big of a problem. In addition to this you could also, if your table is able, exploit VAAI capacity to unload the lock and do it on a level vs. block data store level.

  Yet once, talked with Satyam and you shouldn't be too worried. Especially if you do not overload the table/data store.

  Duncan (VCDX)

  Available now on Amazon: vSphere 4.1 HA and DRS technical deepdive

• Cannot convert thick disk of 10 GB on the thin disk

  I made the migration of storage a week ago to convert thin (10 GB hard drive) and he has succeeded at that time and I saw, it was transformed to thin. After a few days, it was automatically converted to thick. and it happened a few times already, also tried on a few other virtual machines that have 10GB, same thing happens, after a few days of thick back conversion.  I was wondering if there is no drive required to do the migration of storage? someone has an idea? I made large capacity disks more than 50 GB, they are very good. Just having trouble with low size disks

  -Thank you,

  Rahul

  John,

  When you do the storage vMotion, you selected a different data store then the one on which the virtual machine is? If this is not the case, try this one.

• When I plugged in my hdmi to pc I have followed the news but when I rehooked my moniter I lost the signal from my TV.

  moniter and hdmi problems

  When I plugged in my hdmi to pc I have followed the news but when I rehooked my moniter I lost the signal from my TV. I have a vizio hd tv.

  Hello

  ·         What operating system is installed on the computer?

  Method 1: Follow the steps and check if that helps:

  (a) first of all you need a video cable to make the physical connection. For a better image quality, you must connect to the computer to the TV using standard VGA ports or via DVI to HDMI cable provided your TV supports these ports.

  (b) open the "display settings" in your computer and activate the output to the TV screen. You can reflect the content of your computer on the TV or extend the display as a double screen control.

  (c) pick up your TV remote and switch to "External inputs" in the menu. You need to change the value by default "Video 1" to a different selection which may be "HDMI 1" or "video 2" depending on how you made the connection. "

  Important: Make sure you connect the cable to the TV before turning on the computer, because sometimes it may not recognize the external display.

  You may also change the resolution of your TV screen using the display settings in your panel of control remains the image may appear distorted.

  Reference: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/TV-on-your-computer-Understanding-TV-signals-and-TV-tuners

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/connect-your-computer-to-a-TV

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/HDTV-frequently-asked-questions

  Method 2: updated the graphics card driver and see if it helps:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/update-a-driver-for-hardware-that-isn ' t-work correctly

• On my dell Inspiron 6200, the hard disk had to be annihilated and XP Pro has been reloaded. Now the laptop is not wireless networks. How can I fix it?

  When wiped the hard drive and windows XP Pro THAT was recharged the cell seems no longer to see wireless networks. I have a netgear router and 2 other laptops accessing it. It acts as the laptop has the switch WiFi off, but it is not a. I need help!

  Hi WilliamBowman,
   
  -What version of service pack of Windows XP you are using?
   
  Method 1: Install the latest driver available for the wireless network adapter and check if it helps fix the problem.
   
  For more information on the update driver, see:

  How to manage devices in Windows XP

  Method 2: Follow the steps listed in the article given below to resolve this issue:

  How to troubleshoot wireless network connections in Windows XP Service Pack 2

  Note: The steps that are listed in the article are applicable to the other service pack versions of Windows XP as well.

• Unable to run the check disk due to having to restore the system

  When you start the system, it shows that disk needs the consistency check, but then it shows that the drive can be controlled due to the recent installation so system restore first. Although, when you try to restore the system, it is said there are disk errors that should check and may need repair in which it said restart your computer for this. When the computer is retsarted, it shows that the drive needs verification but still, says system needs to restore. So I can't run a check disk or restore the system. Help, please!

  Hi mustakimahmed,

  Welcome to the Microsoft Community and thanks for posting the question. Looks like you are not able to start from desktop due to errors in the disk check and not able to perform the system restore too.

  Try these methods and check:

  Method 1: Run the check disk in windows recovery (winre) mode. Follow these steps:

  (a) open command prompt.

  (b) use the following procedures:

  To repair errors, locate bad sectors and recover readable information, at the command prompt, type chkdsk volume: / r, and then press ENTER.

  Note: If one or more files on the hard disk are open, you will receive the following message is displayed: cannot run Chkdsk because the volume is in use by another process. You want to schedule this volume to check the next time the system restarts? (Y/N)

  Type Y, and then press ENTER to schedule the disk check, and then restart your computer to start the disk check.

  Note: If bad sectors are found in the hard drive, then it could try to fix this particular sector. If you have any data on that, it can get lost.

  Method 2:

  If method 1 fails, because you are not able to perform the disk, or restoring the system check, you may need to contact the manufacturer of the hard drive to get help. As the drive that you are using may be corrupted.

  Hope this information helps. If you have any other questions feel free to respond and we would be happy to help.

• The physical size of ACS db is more than 50% of its actual size. (ACS version: 5.5.0.46)

  Since the Migration to ACS 5.5.0.46 we continue to see the following message appears in the Inbox of alarm

  Cisco Secure ACS alarm (REVIEW): the physical size of ACS db is more than 50% of its actual size.

  Cisco Secure ACS - Alarm Notification
  Severity: critical

  Name of the alarm	System alarm [purge the database]
  Cause/trigger	The physical size of ACS db is more than 50% of its actual size.
  Alarm details	The physical size of ACS db is more than 50% of its actual size de.the size will be reduced after the purge ACS transaction log and compress ACS db.
  September	Mon Mar 17 05:00:06 THIS 2014

  ACS view Compression and backup database is set up and runs without error:

  The work of backup stores a maximum of 4 months to a FTP server.

  Backup: monthly

  Incremental: weekly

  DB: Compression enabled

  Purge and incremental backup history

  Name	Start Time	End Time	Status

  DatabasePurge-Job

  Mon Mar 17 04:00 THIS 2014

  Mon Mar 17 04:00 THIS 2014

  Completed

  as far as I can see the CLI avoid a DB oversized:

  ACS21/acsadmin(config-ACS) # acsview show-dbsize
  Actual size of DB (bytes): 1585192960
  Real DB size (GBs): 1.48
  DB size (bytes): 1605386240
  Physical size DB (GBs): 1.5
  Physical ACSviewlog file size (GBs): 0
  Output ACS21/acsadmin(config-ACS) #.

  ACS21 / admin # display the status of the acs application

  Role of the ACS: PRIMARY

  Process of database ' ' running
  'Management' running process
  'Runtime' running process
  "Adclient" process running
  'Ntpd' running process
  "View-database" running process
  "View-jobmanager' running process
  "View-alertmanager' running process
  "Notice-collector' running process
  "View-logprocessor' running process

  Looking at the user guide:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_secure_access_control_system/5-5/user/guide/acsuserguide/viewer_sys_ops.html#wp1065174

  "The ACS database must be compressed during the maintenance operation. You can run the command acsview-db-compress acs-config mode to reduce the physical size of the database of view when there is a difference between the physical size and the actual size of the database to view. ACS 5.5 stops only the collector newspaper services during compress the operation and will be operational after the compression operation is complete. You must enable the recovery of the newspaper feature retrieve messages received during the compression of database operation.

  In ACS 5.5, database compression operation is automated. You can check the box enable ACS view compress database to compress the ACS database view automatically daily at 05:00 the compression of database operation is executed every day automatically at 05:00 whenever needed. »

  I tried to manually compress DB by "acsview-db-compress' with no effect.

  Hello

  You are running in the CSCum51180bug. The alarm should be a warning, not criticism and should be triggered only when the physical size is greater than the actual size of more than one gigabyte (in your case, the difference is very small, 1.5 vs 1.48).

  The fix must be present on a future update.

  Javier Henderson

  Cisco Systems

• Is there a way to find the actual size of the patterns as if all the HWM meter resetting tables?

  RDBMS Version: 11.2.0.3

  Platform: Oracle Linux 6.2

  The following query gives the size of patterns. But if there is no large table in these schemas that can be narrowed (IE. High tide being reset) then the actual size of these schemas will be less indicated below.

  Is there a way to find the size of a schema, as if the reset of the HWM in all tables in it?

  SQL > select master, sum (bytes/power (1024,3)) GB of dba_segments group by owner by Go order desc;

  OWNER                                  GB

  ------------------------------ ----------

  SBTOEL 1798.49951

  MIGPHS 228.772522

  SYS 22.4576416

  MIGSTATIC 4.79718018

  MIGRFS 2.39648438

  SYSTEME.523681641

  SYSMAN.277893066

  .

  .

  .

  
  

  Tom wrote:

  RDBMS Version: 11.2.0.3

  Platform: Oracle Linux 6.2

  The following query gives the size of patterns. But if there is no large table in these schemas that can be narrowed (IE. High tide being reset) then the actual size of these schemas will be less indicated below.

  Is there a way to find the size of a schema, as if the reset of the HWM in all tables in it?

  SQL > select master, sum (bytes/power (1024,3)) GB of dba_segments group by owner by Go order desc;

  OWNER                                  GB

  ------------------------------ ----------

  SBTOEL 1798.49951

  MIGPHS 228.772522

  SYS 22.4576416

  MIGSTATIC 4.79718018

  MIGRFS 2.39648438

  SYSTEME.523681641

  SYSMAN.277893066

  .

  .

  .

  given zero HWM does NOT change the amount of consumed disk space.

• Actual size of jpg (right click, properties) of the windows Viewer is correct?

  When I open a jpg file in properties it tells me it's 6.42 M (for example 4413 x 3317 pixel at 180dpi). When I opened that same jpg in photoshop (pixels and dpi are the same), it is approx. 40 M
  Who is right? You can get the actual size of the jpg in the windows Viewer easily? I catalog images and I want to record the correct data. Thank you

  Each time a .jpg file is edited and re-registered it loses
  a resolution. This can be very noticeable to a
  low resolution photo... 640x480ppi for example.
  In very high resolution photos that we have today
  12-8-15 cameras digital megapixels... the
  the loss is negligible and is not noticeable to
  the naked eye.

  If you had some very important pictures and wanted to
  make sure that no loss is produced that you could save their
  in a lossless PNG or TIFF format, but the file
  sizes would be equal to that of your .jpg uncompressed.

  This could be very important in a situation where
  the photos were printed in very large sizes.
  High resolution images can be a real asset when
  a small part of the image must be cropped
  as a separate photo.

  An important factor for commercial printing of photos...
  books, magazines, publishers usually ask for pictures
  which are at least 300 dpi.

• Questions regarding the process of implementing container/control. How "parent of filling" and how to get the actual size of the control?

  I'm writing some UI component custom waterfalls. I went if the document several times and still have two questions:

  1. is it possible to adjust the width of the control to fill the container parent without specifying the number hardcoded in pixel? I see many example of code uses '768' as hardcoded width.

  2. I understand that the 'preferred size' could be ignored in some cases. Is it possible that I can get the actual size of the control on the screen programmatically?

  3. is there any signal was issued when a control container/finish covering all of its child nodes? How do I know what size of a control is finally decided?

  Thank you

  mdodd wrote:

  (1) you can use (QML)

  horizontalAlignment: HorizontalAlignment.Fill
  

  or (C++)

  myControl->setHorizontalAlignment(HorizontalAlignment::Fill);
  

  This will cause control occupy the entire width available to its parent. However, keep in mind you may have to use this property on all containers of parent to the node root to get the width of the full screen.

  As far as I KNOW simon_hain is located on the other two issues.

  ((2) & (3) I just dug around and you find LayoutUpdateHandler would do the job:

  https://developer.BlackBerry.com/Cascades/reference/bb__cascades__layoutupdatehandler.html

  mdodd answer on question 1) is correct.

  I can't believe they made a separate category for such a common task. Framework of stunts have had some serious consistency problems, that's what I feel.

  Thanks to all who have contributed to

• Why my photos load as much larger than the actual size of the picture

  My photos are loading of PSE 14 as 13.333 X 20 inches instead of the 4 X 6 inches (actual size).  What I do wrong - I am loading them as I usually do.  I even checked the photos that I took this past spring, and they do the same thing.

  Go to view and then try either:

  Real pixels

  Print size

  See this picture:

  

• When I open a pdf file using adobe default to 139% magnification. How to change the system, so it defaults to the actual size

  When I open a pdf file using adobe default to 139% magnification. How to change the system, so it defaults to the actual size

  Hi christian-laup70425339 .

  Please try this step: -.

  Acrobat > edit > Preferences > Page Display > under Default Layout & Zoom, set "Zoom in" on the value of your choice that you want.

  I would like to know if it works.

  Kind regards

  Christian

• I use mac mini.  Impossible to have the actual size of the work tools

  I'm not able to see the right size of tools... the circle I see on the screen, ddoube the actual size of the tool if I want a 10mm tool, I have the representation of a 1 cm tool...

  Most likely the size of the cursor system is something other than Normal.

  Go to System Preferences > accessibility > display and set the size of the cursor normal

  

• printed page is not "actual size" even after clicking on the actual size

  I try to print forms from the IRS, but they are smaller than actual size printing.  Same problem with state tax forms.  I also clicked on the option "size" real and always get the same result.

  Sorry I couldn't respond sooner.  Thanks for the suggestion, but unfortunately it did not work. Finally, I went to printer manufacturer online support chat and the tech understood that it was a problem of the browser (Firefox) and opted for Google Chrome and now everything works fine.  Thanks for your effort to help.

• When I resize a photo to the web LR displays a very small image, not the actual size.

  When I resize a photo to the web LR displays a very small image, not the actual size that appears when I download on a website! ???

  Yes, it should work. It should show you exactly what the image will look like on normal, non-retine displays. At least if you have the resolution of your screen (in preferences-> display system) the value 'best for display '. In this case your computer exactly double the resolution.

  The link I posted above is for when you want to go further. In fact, he shows how to send images of different sizes to people looking at your site on the retina against those who seek to your site on normal screens. This will allow a still sharper image that people can get on a display to display. What it basically does is make their web browser asks a 1600 pixel image if only they are viewing on a screen high resolution while asking a low-resolution image 800 pixels for people using normal poster. This example uses all available pixels to choose the type of display. It takes just a bit of HTML and javascript coding. My main site done automatically like smugmug has this built already, but my blog site does not automatically so I had to code around it. This makes your images look amazing on the screens with high resolution such as on the screens of the retina and iPads.