Relationship between the user and account in IOM DB

Hello

do you know how is set up the relationship between the user's record in the USR table and an account of application instance in the table form of process (as in UD_LDAP_USR)? I analyzed records from both tables, but failed to find the key to the relationship between the records in these tables.

Peter

The table Ouedraogo is the link between all the tables of an instance of a resource. The ORC_KEY is the process instance key that links the tables of UD_XXX. And there is also the USR_KEY which connects to the table user.

-Kevin

Tags: Fusion Middleware

Similar Questions

  • Table of IOM which shows the relationship between the request and approver

    Hello

    I have a few users who belong to the group "admin".

    Any request for a particular resource goes to this group for approval.

    I tried most of the tables in oim 11g r2 to find a relationship between the request and the approver group.

    The demand table has information about the request but no relationship with regard to the approver. Approver as a group, I need to know the status of name and the Group (pending, approved, rejected) request.

    Please could you all expert let me know the table I can find information on these...

    Thank you

    Search in the SOA tables

    WFTASK

  • I get an error, 'relationship between the workstation and the field has no confidence. "

    I have a 2003 domain controller, this a job gives me an error "trust in relationship between the workstation and the domain failed" so I read I have to reset the server, remove the object and remove the workstation from the domain, but my problem is that I can not even log in as administrator to do. My admin login details work perfect on other machines, but not this one. Help, please!

    On computers that are connected to a domain, you always have the choice to get authenticated by the controller of domain or the local computer. You must select the local computer, and then use a local administrator account.

  • Relationship between the list and ListField...

    Hey people of Java...

    I can't thank you enough for your answers because I'm really starting to "grok" the paradigm of Java.

    Another came today I'm having problems understanding I deconstruct this app MemoryDemo...

    In the screen of the demo is these two lines:

    Get and display the list of customers.
    _customerList = CustomerList.getInstance ();
    _customerListField = new MyListField (_customerList.getNumCustomerRecords ());

    Well, now I understand the first line perfectly. She develops an object with the contents of the customers it contains.

    The second line calls a custom ListField routine that I show below:

    the final private class MyListField extends ListField
    {
    public MyListField (int numEntries)
    {
    Super (numEntries);
    }

    }

    Here is the part that I don't understand:

    It seems to appeal to both the MyListField() and the super() is simply the NUMBER of elements required, but not * that * list to use.  Exactly how is MyListField() or super() knows how to use the list of customers?  I ask because this exact routine is used a few lines more later (in the part of the main screen) to do the same thing for a list of the records of the order - even once without any reference to which list to use.

    It doesn't seem to be an explicit connection or the relationship between the _customerList and ListField is building.  Is somehow deconstruct '_customerList.getNumCustomerRecords ()' to its root and use _customerList somehow?  I don't think that I changed the call to this:

    _customerListField = new MyListField (_customerList.getNumCustomerRecords ());
    _customerListField = new MyListField (PICK_A_NUMBER);

    Where the constant is: public private static final int PICK_A_NUMBER = 50;

    And he ALWAYS displays a list of customers (though now with only 50 files).  How to do know?

    Thanks in advance!

    -John

    "I guess that somewhere in the interior architecture of the ListField, he knows that he has to paint the whole - one at a time - when put on the screen - that's it."

    Fix.

    This is the great thing about ListField.  It attracts only those who are on the screen.  If you use ListField draw a list of 10,000 rows (I tested), and it will only extract and draw the 10 that he needs.

    "Again, I don't find any explicit loop where it is through each element and then calling drawListRow()."

    Good yet once, it is not there.

    "Maybe one day I'll be able to pay it back here."

    It would be great.

  • What are the relationships between the logging and IKM?

    What is the best method to use in the following scenario:
    I have about 20 tables with the large amount of data sources.
    I need to create interfaces that join the source tables in target tables.
    The tables are inserted every few seconds with about hundreds of thousands lines.
    There may be a gap of a few seconds between the insertion of different tables that could be attached.
    The source and target tables are on the same Oracle instance and schema.
    I want to understand the role of: 'Logging CDC' and "IKM - incremental" and
    How can I use it in my script?
    In general, what are the relationships between "Logging" and 'IKM '?
    Use both? Or maybe it's better deelte and insert the target tables?

    I want to understand what is the role of "Logging CDC"?
    Can 'IKM - incremental' work without "logging"?
    Must 'Logging' have PK on the tables?
    What should I do if I can't say PK (there may be several identical lines)?

    Yael thanks in advance

    user604062 wrote:
    Hello
    Thanks for your quick response!

    No probs - its still fresh in memory I did a major project on this topic last year (400 tables, millions of lines per day (inserts, updates, deletes), sup-5 minute latency). The problem is it isn't that well written on the web, that you have read the blog of the example I linked to in my first answer? See also here: http://odiexperts.com/changed-data-capture-cdc/

    Always on logging:
    My source table is inserted all the time.
    The interface to join the source table in the target table.

    In ODI, the correct term would be your source table "fits" in the table target, unless you mean literally that want to join the the source with the taget table table? My question if you want to do with the result of the join?

    What exactly the "journaling" CDC updates?
    It updates the model of ODI? interfaces? The source of data in the model of ODI? The target table?

    Logging CDC configures and deploys the data capture mechanism (Triggers or log based capture, IE Logminer/streams/Goldengate) - it is not updated the model as such, she pointed out the metadata of the model of ODI repositoty as a CDC data store, allowing you, the developer say ODI to use log data if you wish (reported in the interface) There is no change in the target table, you get an indicator of metadata (IND_UPD) against a line during the integration (in C$ and I have tables$) that tells you if its insertion (I) and update (U) or deletion (D). It had ' lines allow you to synchronize the deletions, but yoy say its inserts only then you probably used use this option. "
    So the only changes are the source table to your interface, another diary data (if you use logging) or the table of the actual source (if not using the logging).

    This is the main thing that I don't understand!

    I hope I made a little clearer.

    Try the following as a quick test:

    Reverse a source table an engineer and the target (at least) table.
    Import the update incremental LKM and IKM.
    Import of the JKM you want to use.

    Create an interface between the source and the target without any deployed JKM.
    Configure the options of JKM on the model, the "Start log" to start the process of capture - this is quite a complex stage and a lot of things to understand what is happening in the source database, better to check code ODI sends to the database and to review the documentation of Oracle database for a description of what his weight (instantiate Tables (, sets of creating change, creation of subscribers etc. establishment of newspaper groups, creating views Journalising etc.) -you will need to consult your Source DBA database initially as ODI wants to make many changes to the source DB (in mode Archivelog process max, parallelism, size, Java etc.)

    Now, edit your interface and mark the table source for use "Journalized data bank.
    Restart your interface
    Compare the difference in the generated code in the journal of the operator, see the differences of the operator.

    >

    Thank you, Yael

  • ADF AND SOA: WHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ADF AND SOA

    Hello world

    someone can such me what is the relationship of the ADF with SOA?
    How are they related? or no relationship at all?
    ADF is part of the SOA?
    Why ADF?
    Why SOA?
    Thanks in advance guys.

    Kind regards
    Raja.

    ADF is a framework that helps you to create applications that are designed according to SOA best practices.
    With ADF, you build reusable business services that can be exposed and consumed in SOA flows. Moreover ADF allows you to create parts of the user interface of your SOA application.
    There are other points of integration between the Oracle SOA suite and Oracle ADF - I recommend to watch this for an overview:

    http://download.Oracle.com/otn_hosted_doc/JDeveloper/11gdemos/Introduction_To_ADF/Introduction_To_ADF.html
    http://download.Oracle.com/otn_hosted_doc/JDeveloper/11gdemos/ADFInsider-SOA/OracleInsider-SOA.html

  • Relational table between the user and UD_ADUSER profile

    Hello

    I have a requirement where in I need to write a query to find out the difference between user profile for a particular user data and the form data from the same user AD process in Oracle Identity Manager 11g R2 (11.1.2.0)

    While the details of the user are stored in usr table, the table of process for AD shape is UD_ADUSER table. By comparing the two tables, I find the common attribute to be orc_key in UD_ADUSER and ORC table contains the usr_key and table orc_key / usr the usr_key.

    Is ORC table the proper relational table between usr and UD_ADUSER tables to link users between these two tables usr and UD_ADUSER?

    Please correct me if I'm wrong.

    -Thank you,

    def.

    You can use these two tables. I always spend Ouedraogo table between them because the OST has the status of a resource. You can query between them.

    -Kevin

  • OIM11g - remove the link between the user and the account

    We have configured a rule wrong Recon for a resource and then run the task of reconciliation on a limited number of users; the result is that these users are connected to the target system wrong accounts.
    Now, we have configured the right Recon rule, but we do not know how to clean/delete the 'link' created for users to reconcile, we want to run a new reconciliation from scratch.
    Is this possible?
    Can anyone provide a detailed guide of the how-to (step-by-step)?

    Thank you
    Gabriele

    Published by: user1175296 on June 29, 2012 07:50

    Published by: user1175296 on June 29, 2012 08:05

    user1175296 wrote:
    Hi madhatter.
    I agree with you and I will use the OIMDAO, but for more information and to make a test in the DEV env, can indicate you the name of the 11 tables that you mentioned?

    Sorry for a slight misunderstanding, I feel the ProcessInstance (ORC) table when talking about about 11 tables in detail. These 11 paintings is as follows:

    OLIVIER ObjectInstance
    BOA Organization2ObjectInstance2ProcessInstance
    Ouedraogo ResourceAccount lastAttestedResourceAccounts
    ORC ProcessInstance childProcessInstances
    OSI TaskInformation
    OTI TaskDetailMisc
    NCE ReconciliationManager
    REQ req. reqs
    RECON_ACCOUNT_MATCH ReconAccountMatch
    RECON_EVENTS ReconEvent
    RECON_CHILD_MATCH ReconChildMatch

    As for the ResourceAccount table (Ouedraogo), here's what I found in the file xell.sql of the distribution of the UCR:

    ALTER table OUD
    Add constraint FK_OUD_OIU foreign (OIU_KEY) keys
    references Ouedraogo (OIU_KEY)
    /
    ALTER table OUD
    Add constraint FK_OUD_OUD_PARENT_OIU foreign (OUD_PARENT_OIU_KEY) keys
    references Ouedraogo (OIU_KEY)
    /
    ALTER table RIU
    Add constraint FK_RIU_OIU foreign (OIU_KEY) keys
    references Ouedraogo (OIU_KEY)
    /

    CREATE TABLE ENT_ASSIGN)
    ENT_ASSIGN_KEY NUMBER (19) NOT NULL,
    OIU_KEY NUMBER (19).
    UNIQUE CONSTRAINT UK_ENT_ASSIGN (USR_KEY, ENT_LIST_KEY, OIU_KEY),
    CONSTRAINT ENT_ASSIGN_OIU_FK3 FOREIGN KEY (OIU_KEY) REFERENCES OUEDRAOGO (OIU_KEY)

    CREATE TABLE ENT_ASSIGN_DELTA)
    ENT_ASSIGN_DELTA_KEY NUMBER (19) NOT NULL,
    OIU_KEY NUMBER (19).
    CONSTRAINT ENT_ASSIGN_DEL_OIU_FK1 FOREIGN KEY (OIU_KEY) REFERENCES OUEDRAOGO (OIU_KEY)

    CREATE TABLE ENT_ASSIGN_HIST)
    ENT_ASSIGN_HIST_KEY NUMBER (19) NOT NULL,
    OIU_KEY NUMBER (19).

    As you can see, there are at least 6 references Ouedraogo in 5 tables.

    I myself prefer to delete process Instances (not ResourceAccount), eliminating all of the artifacts supply resource account, including the data of the form (records in the tables of UD_xxx).

  • relationship between the oe_headers and mtl_material tables

    Hello

    can anyone guide me with the link between
    oe_order_headers_all oeha,
    mtl_material_transactions and oe_order_lines_all extreme
    is that correct?

    OELA.line_id = mmt.transaction_source_id
    AND oela.header_id = oeha.header_id
    pls Guide

    Published by: makdutakdu on March 2, 2011 12:06

    Hello

    This join is not correct.
    The ID of the header is not same as transaction source line id.
    But line id is the same as the transaction source line id

    Select order_number in the oe_order_headers_all where header_id in
    (select header_id in the oe_order_lines_all where line_id in)
    (by selecting TRX_SOURCE_LINE_ID in Mtl_material_Transactions)
    )

    Kind regards
    Sabari

  • Relationship between the Application and the data group

    Hi all

    Can someone please help me get a query that tells me which application is associated with which group of data?

    Thank you

    Moore

    Moore,

    Request FND_DATA_GROUP_UNITS_V - http://etrm.oracle.com/pls/et1211d9/etrm_pnav.show_object?c_name=FND_DATA_GROUP_UNITS_V&c_owner=APPS&c_type=VIEW

    If the view doesn't meet your needs, and then write your own query using the following tables:

    APPLSYS. FND_DATA_GROUPS

    http://ETRM.Oracle.com/pls/et1211d9/etrm_pnav.show_object?c_name=FND_DATA_GROUPS&c_owner=APPLSYS&c_type=table

    APPLSYS. FND_DATA_GROUP_UNITS

    http://ETRM.Oracle.com/pls/et1211d9/etrm_pnav.show_object?c_name=FND_DATA_GROUP_UNITS&c_owner=APPLSYS&c_type=table

    APPLSYS. FND_APPLICATION

    http://ETRM.Oracle.com/pls/et1211d9/etrm_pnav.show_object?c_name=FND_APPLICATION&c_owner=APPLSYS&c_type=table

    Thank you

    Hussein

  • Relationship between the versions and plan_hash_value

    All,

    I ' just trying to understand versions n/b, the child cursors and plan_hash_value

    1. a sql_id can have only a single hash_value.
    2. a sql_id can have several versions
    3. a version can have multiple plan_hash_value

    Where is the 'child' slider fits?

    TIA,
    JJ

    Just to do some additional testing, and everything will become clear.

  • Relationship between the naa and the number LUN? (And SCSI id and mpx)

    When you look at a map of storage on a Fibre Channel network I see a few different "naa" id: s for each LUN. LUNs from the same SAN naa seems similar, but always unique.

    My first question is if the "naa" is based on something physical disks or if he comes an ID the SAN attached to each logic unit number as it is created?

    Is it true that a name of mpx is something an ESX host can produce when no naa is known?

    The final question is the SCSI id that could be seen of a LUN in the storage of vCenter views. There seems to be a SCSI id for each disk/LUN, and I wonder what this SCSI id? If it was only a single disc, it might be a physical serial number of the drive itself, but when you look at a LUN composed of several discs there must be something else.

    Its just only usually know the WWN for each unit number logic is unique.

    Channel is a former SCSI reference - very rarely used nowadays, and, as you mention, is almost always '0'.

    -Matt

    VCP, VCDX #52, Unix Geek, Nerd of storage

  • Relationship between the asmdisk and linux

    Hi all

    I need to know which linux devices are assigned to an asmdisk. I try to make using the oracleasm querydisk option, but no results:

    # /etc/init.d/oracleasm querydisk PCMSDATA1
    Disk "PCMSDATA1" is a valid ASM disk

    I'm trying to find searching the v$ asm_disk view, but only to score the oracleasm name, not the linux device name:

    SQL > select name, path of v$ asm_disk;

    PATH NAME
    ------------------------------ --------------------
    PCMSDATA1 ORCL:PCMSDATA1
    PCMSDATA2 ORCL:PCMSDATA2
    PCMSDATA3 ORCL:PCMSDATA3
    PCMSFLASH1 ORCL:PCMSFLASH1
    PCMSFLASH2 ORCL:PCMSFLASH2

    any ideas on how I can find this information?

    Kind regards
    dbajug

    Try:

    /etc/init.d/oracleasm querydisk -p 
    
  • How to establish the relationship between the tables contact and Global (entity) in Oracle Service Cloud to preconfigure data

    Hello

    We strive to integrate the OPA attributes to the Cloud Service Oracle tables to store session data for the customer portal users.

    We tried mapping the attributes of the OPA with relevant tables of cloud Service Oracle? Is there any installation of additional data to create to retrieve the session data for the particular user / contact?

    We managed to save tha data in arrays of cloud Service for users of ananymous and also well regarding customers portal users but to preconfigure data do we need to do any additional configuration / mapping to the contact table?

    Please help on the establishment of the relationship between the contact and Global (new table created in cloud Service) tables.

    Thank you

    Vivek

    Hi Vivek,

    To load data from the Contact in the the OPA policy template, you must configure the widget of the OPA. For instructions, see the following articles:

    - Incorporate an interview that uses data portals in Oracle Service Cloud Customer Portal

    - Deploy and configure the sample OPA widget

    - Insert the widget to sample in a customer portal page

    Obviously, you need to do the mapping in OPM as well, but even if the mapping is correct, you will not be able to load the Contact data unless the widget of the OPA is implemented.

    See you soon,.

    Jasmine

  • What is the difference/relationship between a subject and a page?

    Hi all

    I'm not sure of the relationship between a topic and a new page: it seems that a subject can be made up of pages, but when I look at the HTML of the subject, there is no new section (DIV) for the addition of the page.

    Also, not sure about the relationship between the book and the pages/topics.

    You would be grateful if someone could either point of reference material or provide a few clarifying words on that.

    Thank you, Donna

    In regards to the benefits of the pages pointing to topics:

    Placeholders (table of contents Pages) allow a single topic to appear in several places in the table of contents. If the table of contents used directly the subject, each topic could appear only in one place. For example, maybe help is divided into sections, user and administrator, and administrators and regular users can add coordinates to a person in the application. Using a placeholder allows a single procedure to be created (as the task is the same for both users) and then referenced in the two sections of the table of contents.  If the subjects were used directly, two different subjects will have to be created. You can also organize your subjects in a folder structure that suits you and use a different structure in the table of contents.

    The placeholder allows also a display name different be used, for example, if you have a long topic name but want a shorter name to appear in the table of contents, or if the topic appears in several places in your table of contents and you want to focus slightly different in each place, say for different groups of users.

Maybe you are looking for