Remote Site Replication

Similar Questions

• Requirements for vSphere remote site replication

  I run 3 Enterprise 5.5 x vSphere hosts in A Site with vCenter.   I want to add a new host in a remote site and configure vSphere replication between them.  Issues related to the:

  • Do I need to vCenter in slot 2?
  • If vCenter Site of A is the Site management and hosts of the Site B and Site A goes down, vSphere replicated VMs can be restarted to Site B without problem?
  • Is there a risk to not have a vCenter dedicated to Site B on the changeover plan?

  Thank you

  -Matt

  Hello

  (A) If you have vCenter in slot 2, you will need to deploy device VR and match two VR UI sites.

  In the case where something happens to site A, losing vCenter and/or VR device, you can use vCenter and VR device to site B to perform a recovery after disaster and put in place the VMS to site B, inside of vCenter inventory B.

  (B) If you have no server vCenter in slot 2:

  1. There is no need to deploy handset unit of VR (embedded DB for server VRMS + VR + VRMS) for site B.

  2. you can deploy additional device VR-server only for site B, so that the replication traffic goes directly from the source ESXi to the correct server in VR.

  3. If the disaster arrives at the site, you must have vCenter Server and VRM in the combined unit of VR upward and running order to use the VR UI to perform a disaster recovery. If vCenter Server or VRMS manage warehouses of data target is corrupted/lost, the only way to recover after a disaster is to consolidate recovery replica logs manually rename and replicated configuration files and hope that consolidated records represent a coherent source VM instance. This procedure is subject, not officially supported, and care must be taken when building the redo logs, in order to ensure the consistency of the data in the disks of the virtual machine, not some partial block updates.

  Kind regards

  Martin

• If we have 2 remote sites with the same shared storage, can we mount a drive shared on remote site?

  Dear Experts,

  If we have 2 remote sites with the same shared storage, can mount us a drive on remote site?

  • Assume that the oracle database is on the shared disk (for example HP 3PAR)
  • Primary Oracle server with storage as a common drive (storage shared on sites geographical apart) have all the files database.
  • failure, it is possible to mount the drive even at the remote site and mount the database oracle it?

  There must be no effect on the as it should the same disk that has dismantled master site.

  Thank you and best regards,

  IVW

  Thanks a lot mseberg

  Is it a design valid ?

  • We have remote sites and want to set up DR. As we only SE pare data is therefore no choice.
  • We think of the SAN replication option.

  Have you ever seen / configured such architecture or design?

  Can you please throw some light on this. Thanks in advance for your ideas.

  Thank you best regards &,.

  IVW

• ERROR MSG - 1023040 - partition of remote site: need to understand

  Hello

  I currently have a problem with the partitions between the two cubes.

  Architecture:
  database of 80 countries (source)
  1 world database (destination)

  Process:
  -Partitions are dynamically created by maxl scripts:

  -------------------------------------------------------------
  the coil $ 1;
  Change request comment $2 ' * _batch_ *';
  Change the comment to request $4 ' * _batch_ *';
  Modify the application of the system $2 load;
  Modify the application of the system $4 load;
  Change request $2 disable start-up;
  Change request $4 disable start-up;
  Disable application $2 ALTER connects;
  ALTER request $4 disable connects;
  
  / * Create Transparant Partition between countries in the world cube cube * /.
  create or replace the replicated partition $2. $3
  AREA
  "" S_R_N",
  & curr_month,
  & local_currency, "D_EURO."
  @IDESCENDANTS ("P_Produit"),
  @LEVMBRS ("M_Marche", 1), "M_Marche,"
  @IDESCENDANTS ("B_Marque"),
  @IDESCENDANTS ("U_Sourcing"),
  @REMOVE (@DESCENDANTS ("I_Masse"), @LIST ("I_55CCOM")), @DESCENDANTS ("I_Divers").
  @IDESCENDANTS ("NA_Nature"), PCS '
  for $4.5 $
  AREA
  "" S_R_N",
  & curr_month,
  "D_DEV", "D_EUR."
  @IDESCENDANTS ("P_Produit"),
  @LEVMBRS ("M_MixClient", 0), "M_MixClient,"
  @IDESCENDANTS ("B_Marque"),
  @IDESCENDANTS ("U_Sourcing"),
  @REMOVE (@DESCENDANTS ("I_Masse"), @LIST ("I_55CCOM")), @DESCENDANTS ("I_Divers").
  @IDESCENDANTS ("NA_Nature"), MCX,
  & country_name"
  mapped global (", $ 7, 'D_EURO', 'M_Marche' D_) to (W_$ 6, D_DEV, 'D_EUR', 'M_MixClient')
  ;
  
  update the replicated partition $2. $3 à $4. $5 all data;
  Drop partition replicated $2. $3 to $4.5 $;
  
  Change the application $2 start activate;
  Change the start application enable $4;
  Enable application $2 ALTER connects;
  ALTER request $4 activate connects;
  Change request comment $2 ' * _enable_ *';
  Change the comment to request $4 ' * _enable_ *';
  Change the unloading system $2 application;
  Modify the application of the unloading system $4;
  Spool off;
  Disconnection;
  "exit";
  -------------------------------------------------------

  -Cubes of defragmentation, launch country of replications successively to the cubes world sequentially.
  the order of the country is not the same from one month to another.
  Treatment is started each month.

  
  S ymptoms :
  -Partition fall into the error with the following message is displayed, but not systematically.
  Message:

  MAXL > update replicated partition PGC_ESP. Pgc_esp PGC_MOND. Pgc_mond to all data;
  
  ERROR MSG - 1023040 - remote site [[Wed Nov 29 10:21:03 2013] hprx1302/PGC_MOND/Pgc_mond/PGC_ADMIN/Error (1023040) remote site msg [[Wed Nov 29 10:21:02 2013] hprx1302 / PGC_ESP / Pgc_esp / PGC_ADMIN / msg of error (1023040) of the remote site [[Wed Nov 29 10:21:01 2013] hprx1302/PGC_MOND/Pgc_mond/PGC_ADMIN/Error (1042012) network error [32]: can not send data]]].

  We note that the error occurs in the following cases:
  -L'errerur occurs generally when the average ratio of clustering is low. (fragmented cube) for cubes source and / or destination
  -How many other replication have been done before: in the remaining replication cube last from 10 to 15.
  -We wrong once on the environment of recipe on the first cube with average ratio of 0.96 but clustering server recipe is much less effective.

  We have noticed that when you perform a defrag cubes source and destination once the obtained error replication of treatment is more grave in error.
  Problem: world of cube of defragmentation take 10 hours.

  We also made the following observation:

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  OK/INFO - 1051034 - user [PGC_ADMIN] connection.
  Last connection OK/INFO - 1051035 - Friday, November 29, 2013 10:19:46.
  OK/INFO - 1053012 - [Pgc_esp] object is locked by the user [PGC_ADMIN].
  OK/INFO - 1053012 - [Pgc_mond] object is locked by the user [PGC_ADMIN].
  OK/INFO - 1053012 - [54116855] object is locked by the user [PGC_ADMIN].
  OK/INFO - 1053012 - [39843334] object is locked by the user [PGC_ADMIN].
  OK/INFO - 1053013 - unlocked by the user [PGC_ADMIN] [54116855] object.
  OK/INFO - 1053013 - unlocked by the user [PGC_ADMIN] [39843334] object.
  WARNING - 1241137 - [target] - definition of the Partition is not valid: [cell count mismatch: area [1279464568200] for members of the unit [1] by dimension [63 1 2 1 6 26 7 245 1 37955]].
  OK/INFO - 1053012 - [25586652] object is locked by the user [PGC_ADMIN].
  OK/INFO - 1053012 - [11329970] object is locked by the user [PGC_ADMIN].
  OK/INFO - 1053013 - unlocked by the user [PGC_ADMIN] [25586652] object.
  OK/INFO - 1053013 - unlocked by the user [PGC_ADMIN] [11329970] object.
  WARNING - 1241137 - [Source] - definition of the Partition is not valid: [cell count mismatch: area [47895484140] for members of the unit [1] by [63 1 6 7 2173 2 17 1 245] dimension].
  OK/INFO - 1053013 - unlocked by the user [PGC_ADMIN] [Pgc_esp] object.
  OK/INFO - 1053013 - unlocked by the user [PGC_ADMIN] [Pgc_mond] object.
  OK/INFO - 1051037 - disconnection of the [PGC_ADMIN] user, active for 0 minutes.
  OK/INFO - 1241124 - Partition replaced.
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Following these results, we must understand what is happening.

  We would like to understand why the scores fall errors?

  why we have the "definition of the Partition is not valid" message in the logs when creating the partition?

  
  Kind regards
  Oliv.

  to eq cut may be in the definition of the partition.

  245 members in source and target to 245.

• . Audio OGA works very well with local files, is to play at the remote site.

  I created a mini-site. It works well when I test it on my computer using local files, but the sound does play with it is downloaded on my remote site.
  The problem occurs on multiple computers, with several versions of Firefox, on Windows 7 and OSX Snow Leopard.

  Your server sends the correct MIME information in the Content-Type header? See this link for more information: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Configuring_servers_for_Ogg_media

• Group Policy to deploy software will not work on a remote site

  I currently have 3 domain controllers in my environment.  2 (DC1 & DC2) are on my main site (Site A) and 1 (DC3) is on my remote site (Site B).
  When the network between Site A and B link is down users who connect remote Site B (locally) do not receive group policies who deploy software.

  "gpresult /R" shows the software deployment strategy is applied, but the software is not installed.

  No errors in the event log.

  The source of these software installs is my DFS that IS accessible on the Site B when the link is down, as NETLOGON and SYSVOL directories.

  All FSMO roles are DC1.  All domain controllers are Windows 2008 R2.

  What I'm missing here?

  Joshua

  Try asking in the Windows Server forum:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer

• I can't enter my system remotely (site office) from my house, but can't access websites from here (site office)

  DNS server search order has failed

  I can't enter my system remotely (site office) from my house, but can't access websites from here (site office). When I go to "network diagnostics" it shows "Server dns search order" has failed.

  How can I solve this problem? Please help me.

  Hello yazid.

  I recommend posting your question on our TechNet site for remote desktop connection problems located here:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/winserverTS/threads

• Not able to connect to a remote site to the Windows XP computer.

  Original title: need help for the remote Office of information...

  .......... A storm disabled the remote site.  This site is now running, but my laptop refuses to connect to the remote site.  What should I do?

  Hi BarbaraAnnH,

  1. you receive any code or an error message when you try to connect to the remote site?

  2 are. what remote you referring?

  You can temporarily disable all security software and check if the problem persists.

  Note: Later, enable the security software after checking.

  Reference: Remote Desktop: frequently asked questions

  Hope the helps of information.

• Design of CPU: cucm + remote site

  Hi all

  Now, our company have a HQ Office and a remote site in a different city and we have a CUCM 5.1.3 server in the HQ Office, remote site have approximately 30 cisco 7911 phones registered to the HQ CUCM server. HQ and remote control have their own local voice gateway 2821 h323 (HQ has a PVDM2-64 in VG, remote control has a PVDM2-32 in VG) HQ and distance of telephone calls using the G729 codec to save bandwidth (there is a line of rental of 2 M between the seat and the remote site).

  My question is: HQ Office take often together 8 partners (using MeetMe), because we have no meeting place, server or other device cisco PVDM2 only, so I have to renounce material use CFB, but software CFB support only of the G711 codec and the QUEUE to the HQ router do support G711, if I keep using G729 between Headquarters and remote site Remote staff can not dial a MeetMe meeting and cannot get their voicemail.  Who can tell me what is the best design for my CPU?

  

  Hello

  Throw on this diagram.

  Figure 2-14 centralized resources for media in: -.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/solutions/ns340/ns414/ns742/ns656/net_design_guidance0900aecd80488134.PDF

  The transcoder on CUCM site should be in the MRGLs for phones ip at the remote site.

  HTH

  Alex

  Please note the useful messages

• PIX 515E for VPN remote site

  Hello

  7.0 (1) version pix

  ASDM version 5.0 (1)

  I have a situation where you go paas-thanks to the VPN feature goes on our PIX 515E. I tried to put this on the pix using a VPN Wizard Site to site

  who is enabled. I was unable to connect to the pix from the remote site. Witch's journal replied negotiate the pix is OK and the success

  The problem is when I try to set up the tunnel to the top of the remote site. I fall without failure.

  where can I see the vpn pix for error log?

  is there a manual for the solution of site to site VPN using the wizard

  Help, please.

  Thanks in advance

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00804acfea.shtml#ASDM

  the section 'use adsm' (step 14) gives an example on how to set up vpn lan - lan via adsm

  Newspaper to go to the section "check".

• VPN clients cannot access remote sites - PIX, routing problem?

  I have a problem with routing to remote from our company websites when users connect via their VPN client remotely (i.e. for home workers)

  Our headquarters contains a PIX 515E firewall. A number of remote sites to connect (via ADSL) to head office using IPSEC tunnels, ending the PIX.

  Behind the PIX is a router 7206 with connections to the seat of LANs and connections to a number of ISDN connected remote sites. The default route on 7206 points to the PIX from traffic firewall which sits to ADSL connected remote sites through the PIX. Internal traffic for LAN and ISDN connected sites is done via the 7206.

  Very good and works very well.

  When a user connects remotely using their VPN client (connection is interrupted on the PIX) so that they get an IP address from the pool configured on the PIX and they can access resources located on local networks to the office with no problems.

  However, the problem arises when a remote user wants access to a server located in one of the remote sites ADSL connected - it is impossible to access all these sites.

  On the remote site routers, I configured the access lists to allow access from the pool of IP addresses used by the PIX. But it made no difference. I think that the problem may be the routes configured on the PIX itself, but I don't know what is necessary to solve this problem.

  Does anyone have suggestions on what needs to be done to allow access to remote sites for users connected remotely via VPN?

  (Note: I suggested a workaround, users can use a server on LAN headquarters as a "jump point" to connect to remote servers from there)

  with pix v6, no traffic is allowed to redirect to the same interface.

  for example, a remote user initiates an rdp session for one of the barns adsl. PIX decrypts the packet coming from the external interface and looks at the destination. because the destination is one of adsl sites, pix will have to return traffic to the external interface. Unfortunately, pix v6.x has a limitation that would force the pix to drop the packet.

  with the v7, this restriction has been removed with the "same-security-traffic control intra-interface permits".

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a008046f307.shtml

• A WLC headquarters and Remote Site

  Hello

  I have a question for the WLC remote deployment.

  For the moment, we have the following design:

  Head office

  -Network 192.168.49.0/24

  -WLC 4402 Version 4.2.61.0

  -3 x LAP1252

  -LWAPP layer 3

  -Wep SSID

  -Wpa SSID

  -Windows PDC with Active Directory, DHCP server and data storage local

  -ACS Version 3.2 for RADIUS and RADIUS authentication--> external DB to Active Directory

  Remote site

  -Network 192.168.50.0/24

  -2 x LAP1252

  -Wep SSID

  -Wpa SSID

  -Windows PDC with Active Directory, DHCP server and data storage local

  -ACS Version 3.2 for RADIUS and RADIUS authentication--> external DB to Active Directory

  Connection between the seat and the Remote Site

  -2 Mbit ADSL

  The problem is, wireless on the remote site clients get an IP DHCP 192.168.49.0/24 Beach headquarters. Users at the remote site

  most of the time only using the local database server in the remote offices. With the actual design connection ADSL 2 Mbit passes traffic hole the

  WLC at Headquarters and at the remote site. It works but it is not that efficient.

  The problem could be solved with HREAP, but what I think is, that it is not possible to have the same SSID to Headquarters and remote site with different VLAN.

  How can I achieve this, the clients at the remote site to connect to the same SSID (wep or wpa), get an ip address from the remote site (192.168.50.0) DHCP server

  and the traffic is enabled locally.

  I hope that you understand what is the problem.

  Thank you in advance for your help!

  Yes, putting the HREAP remote access point mode will allow the WLAN even to be available on the access point but the traffic could tip locally to the AP instead of in the tunnel to the controller. After the AP mode HREAP you re so what VLAN you want traffic for each WLAN to immerse on for this AP.

• WLC centralized with several remote Sites

  Hi people,

  I read the documentation of design for wireless devices, and I can't find a definitive answer to the following:

  Is it possible to have a WLC centrally (in a DMZ), who controls several remote sites?  Each site must have the same SSID, however the IP subnet will be different at each site.

  I have attached a base PDF showing what we are trying to achieve.

  Thanks for your help.

  Kris

  Of course, you could put either the AP mode H-REAP so that the data of the customer traffic is enabled locally to the AP or you can use groups of AP.  With groups AP customer traffic be dug to the controller and group AP policy would determine which interface / VLAN, traffic should be poured in.

• How to copy tftp on remote site VPN

  I know that by the definition of ASA management interface can ping or telnet/SSH to the inside interface of the ASA remote VPN. But it does not work for TFTP. Is it possible to copy config TFP server in a remote site via VPN and using the source as a local within the interface interface?

  Your home, remember messages useful rate.

  Concerning

• ASA Site, Remote Site cannot access DMZ to the Hub site

  So I've been scratching my head and I just can't visualize what I what and how I want to do.

  Here is the overview of my network:

  Headquarters: ASA 5505

  Site1: ASA 5505

  Site2: ASA 5505

  Training3: ASA 5505

  All Sites are connected L2L to the location of the Headquarters with VPN Site to Site.

  Since the HQ site I can ping each location by satellite, and each satellite location I can ping the HQ site. I will also mention that all other traffic is also correctly.

  Here's my number: HQ site, I have a DMZ set up with a web/mail server. This mail/web server is accessible from my HQ LAN, but not from the satellite location. I need allow that.

  What should I do?

  My second question is that I want for satellite sites to see networks of eachother. I should create a VPN network between sites, or can this be solved in the same way that the question of the DMZ?

  I enclose the show run from my ASA HQ

  See the race HQ ASA

  For the mail/web server that requires access on the remote site VPN tunnels, you must add the servers to the acl crypto, similar to the way you have it for network access. Make sure that both parties have the ACL in mirror. If you're natting from the DMZ to the outside, make sure you create an exemption from nat from the dmz to the outside for VPN traffic.

  For the second question, because you have only three sites, I would recommend creating a tunnel from site to site between two satellite sites.

  HTH

  PS. If you found this post useful, please note it.