Rendering and Multi Core Machines

Similar Questions

• The host VMware workstation and multi-core CPU

  Apologies if this has already been answered, but all my research to turn questions about processors how can specify in a virtual machine. It's not what I'm after here.

  I want to know is the use of VMware workstation (v6 and v7) is available on a multi-core worksation host physical cores.

  I have a scenario where we have several virtual machines containing sensitive coding environments. The material that they are on is a little old and we don't have the time or the knowledge to recreate systems (a combination of Matlab, DSpace and some custom coding). Our only option (and we did it for a couple with success so far) is to create virtual machines of these workstations.

  Which is absolutely essential for us is the material we choose VMs on host. Virtual machines will use simple/double/processors virtual.

  In order to choose the correct hardware platform, I need to know if VMware workstation is running an instance of the virtual computer within a single processor (in this case is the reduced performace?), or if there are multithreaded and make the most of the hardware it will run on.

  (We are not welcome, never more 2 virtual machines at the same time)

  Any suggestions on material would be appreciated also. I think of something based around a core of Xeon 4-6 with 12-16 GB of RAM.

  Thank you very much

  Nick

  Correct, for laboratory/debugging and interaction VM Workstation is pretty good.

• Socket disorders and multi-core

  I have an application of "hybrid" as its referenced in the docs that I use to generate the library Sandy flash 3D scenes and use them as graphics animated on top a video source online for recording and broadcasting.
  
  The camera sends hello flash, the flash application making, that draws the scene, the socket sends a byte array to the camera where it is mixed with the live camera alpha.
  
  On a single basic system, there is no problem.
  
  On a dual core system, I don't get the whole byte array. In some ways, it seems in the middle to get the bitmap image in the table, something stops writing and is emptied anyway.
  
  I get all 307200 bytes to the camera, but the image is not entirely drawn to the byte array. It follows a cantonment random image, according to the number of bytes is actually sent.
  
  noticed another behavior is when I drag the window, taking always meets the code c ++ calling, always sends 307200 bytes, all ' 0 "s, while nothing is called on the bytes in the getPixels.
  I can live with this behavior, but not the first.
  

  Quote:
  
  b bit mapdata, bytes is the byte array
  b.Draw (m_iDrawable);
  bytes = b.getPixels (new Rectangle (0,0,320,240));
  writeBytes (bytes, 0, 307200);
  Flush();

• How can I configure a program to run on only one heart of my multi-core computer?

  Hello

  I have a multiple basic computer, except a very processor that is only designed to run on one heart program (maybe you have heard of him; Dwarf Fortress. Otherwise, it is not really necessary, but good). Now I wonder, how can I set the program to run only on a single heart, whenever I start it? I have a shortcut on my desktop, so if it is not possible to change the parameters of the program or other stuff like in Windows itself, I don't have the ability to change the shortcut to make it work on a carrot.

  Hello Drake1500,

  Thank you for using the Microsoft Windows Vista Forums.

  Since given as each program/software is configured differently to work on mulit or transformation of a nucleus there is nothing that Vista can do to change that.  You need to change something in the formula of the show itself.  I enclose a link below which talks about this issue.  Please let me know if you have any other questions.

  http://msdn.Microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163340.aspx
  Optimize Managed Code for Multi - Core Machines James Microsoft Support Engineer answers visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• I need to download and install KB896256 for multi-cores (AMD) after upgrading to SP3?

  I made a new build after my old PC has stagnated.

  The new PC using an AMD PhenomII X 4.

  After you install SP3, I read on XP Pro Optimization for multi-cores and discover KB896256.

  What I have to install KB896256 after SP3 to optimize XP for this multi-core processor?

  Thank you.

  No, not if SP3 and all post-SP3 updates have been installed successfully (in which case the fix would not yet installed).

• PES 10 times Organizer and editor crash on multi-core hardware. set the processor affinity unique mode fixed

  As I pointed out in thread http://forums.Adobe.com/thread/941128 I found the editor and organizer for PES 10 crash in basic multi environment, I'm WIndows 64 bit, latest updates (including sp1), I had the same problems with Windows 7 32-bit.

  Workaround is to set the affinity to a single processor.  From the Task Manager, select the "processes" tab, find the exe (for example PhotoshopElementsOrganizer), right click, select "set affinity...". "and reduce the number of CPUS selected (checked) for a single.  (Under different versions of Windows specific means vary, but the basic steps are the same).  It doesn't matter what cpu choose you, but if you are the editor and organizer, put it on different processors.

  Pretty much everything these days being multi-core material, my hypothesis is that Adobe test in a virtualized environment and therefore do not discover this type of unreliabillity.  Adobe really need to test their software further exactly the same problem exists in PSE 6, is hardly new to them.

  The solution is in what precedes.

  If Adobe read this, they should take note that a virtualized environment does not provide a decent systems CPU multi-core fidelity emulation.  The ONLY way to test the reliability of an application is on REAL hardware.

• NB100 - multi-core of BIOS settings & battery discharge while off

  Hello, I bought the N100-R there are several monts. The unit is very reliable, but when taking take a closer look at the settings of the bios a few days ago I noticed that the multi-core enabled, while the processor is a single-core. After turning off I found that the drive produces some frequent hickups so intense, that the cursor starts jumping.
  Overall performance seems to be less catchy with multi-core disabled.
  The logs say nothing about the problem of hard drive, so I made a recovery today including about 168 updates in a row (as a nice side effect the update manager seem to be able to find the files of package again, which was not the case for two weeks or more).
  My question is, why the multi-core is enabled on a machine simple heart?

  The biggest problem is the issue of discharge while the device is in standby mode or even turned off.
  Some entries to mention this issue recommending upgrades the core among others), and I wonder if Toshiba is about to face in the near future.
  Here, even once, I played with the settings of the bios and disabled option wake-up-on-lan, such as recommended, however nothing has changed.
  Thanks in advance.

  Although single-core CPU, I thought they were hyperthreading (with what looks like two hearts to the BONE). In this case I guess that this setting disables hyperthreading?

  168 updates? What is the first set of updates never applied? Sounds like a lot!

• Multi-core CPU: this is an important factor?

  Hello

  I guess the CPU multi-core is probably important. But is there a rule or guidelines? I would be grateful any entry about the experience of the use of multi-core processors in a virtual machine (as a workstation or server) environment. In all the scenarios below, we assume that the memory sharp and e/s disk are satisfactory. I would like to isolate the factor of the CPU.

  Q1. A two CPU cores is equivalent to two physical CPU core?

  Q2. Number of vs. frequency of the processor cores: which is more important to run VM? Example: 2 hearts to hearts vs 4 3 GHz to 2.33 GHz

  Q3. How is the "engine" of the virtual machine using muti-core with regard to the number of virtual machines running? Is it true to say more "better cores?

  Example 1: host has 4 cores of CPU 1, 2 running virtual machines (what a waste of CPU resources?)

  Example2: host has 4 cores of the processor 1, 6 running virtual machines

  Q4. (Phenom2, Core 2, Xeon, i7) CPU architecture: the "engine" of the VM uses these CPU everything too, or is there someone who is particularly well suited for running virtual machines?

  Thanks in advance for any help.

  Q1 - Yes - ESX/ESXi treat each heart as a logical processor and plan virtual processors to these logical processors

  T2 - both are important - the vmkernel treats views CPU as a pool of cycles - 4 2.33 GHz is a pool of 9,32 GHz while 2 x 3 GHz is a pool of 6 GHz so as long as a virtual CPU has not a complete CPU - a virtual CPU can run on one heart at a time, so a 3 GHz core will be able to provide 3 GHz to a virtual computer

  Q3 - Yes more cores is better - the 'VM engine' called the vmkernel will plan the virtual machines between all hearts - VMware recommended 4 to 8 virtual processors per core according to load - so a single quad core cpu can support 16 to 32 virtual processors according to the load

  Q4 - he use them all as well - it will benefit from new technology of virtualization being in current technology chips.

  If you find this or any other answer useful please consider awarding points marking the answer correct or useful

• PSE 8 and Intel Core Solo

  I can not install PSE 8 and then noticed this state of system requirements that you must have a multi processor. So I thought go back and reinstall PSE 6, that works on my computer core solo, but then I noticed that the system requirements for PSE 6 says multi core. What gives?

  My question: Will PES running on a machine solo core?

  I also have a core 2 duo machine but PSE 8 won't install. I followed all of the suggestions (uninstall, new account admin, etc..) Any suggestions?

  Thank you

  Ted

  Hi Ted,

  I think we connected earlier and your problem has been resolved? If this is the case, can you please mark this thread as response so that we can consider as closed?

  Kind regards

  Ankush

• Tecra A9: Cannot enable or disable Multi Core processing in the BIOS

  I have a Tecra A9 and want to swicht out of the Multi Core Processing in the Bios, but it is impossible.

  To the old Bios version (1.50), it has been possible.

  Now I use the most recent (2.10) and I can't move the cursor to this selection.

  The special key strokes?

  If this isn't the case - where can I download the previous version of the bios where this selection is possible?

  Thank you

  Ulli

  Hello

  > Otherwise - where can I download the previous version of the bios where this selection is possible?
  This is not possible because it is always the newest available BIOS can be downloaded.

  With regard to the option in the BIOS.
  Do you mean you are not able to choose this option or you can't change the value?

  Toshiba BIOS:
  Usually the buttons PgUp / PdDn would change the BIOS page. The arrow buttons to select items. SPACE or BkSp can be used to change the values.

  But note; You can only change the value if it s interchangeable. But many options appear in the BIOS but is not editable.

• LabVIEW 8.6.1 AMD Multi Core Crash with call loops

  Hi all

  I tried, but I couldn't find all the messages with my exact situation.  Here it goes:

  I have a multi-core AMD Phenom 64 processor and I'm running Windows 7 64 and I am running an application in LabVIEW 8.6.1 in compatibility mode.  (I know, not a good idea)  I have a pretty complex application with several timed loops and the different ways to talk to FieldPoint (FieldPoint 6.0.6 and experimentation with Modbus talk to cFP-180 x).  You may be wondering why I'm using call loops.  It is an application of RT which can also run on Windows using structures conditional disable, etc.

  I had met sporadic crashing earlier in my files executable for more than a year and used a lvalarms.dll in only patched version my executables.  It was on a totally different processor and we were running Vista at that time.  Now, I notice a very similar behavior on 8.6.1, except now the development environment all crashes or breaks down my executable compiled as well.

  I found this KB, but he was referring to problems observed on LabVIEW 8.5, and the utility of the OS is only for Windows XP.  As recommended in the KB, I used BCDEdit to set the flag onecpu and now everything seems to work normally.  My PC is now significantly slower, however, and I wonder if there is another workaround solution that I might be able to try.

  If you have read so far and who have followed my description you already have my gratitude.  If anyone else has experienced this?  Someone at - it ideas?

  Thank you very much

  Jim

  Alright.  In case someone else runs into this apparently dark scenario, here's workaround solutions I've found:

  1. see if the problem goes away by setting the processor affinity using the Task Manager. Open the Task Manager, look under the "Processes" tab and right-click on the process. (for example LabVIEW.exe or your executable)  Under the context menu which select "set affinity...". "and select only the CPU 0.  In my case, I have a quad-core processor, so I up to four logical processors that are displayed in the dialog box that results.

  Run your application code or the executable file for a while, and if everything seems to be stable, it would seem that you have isolated the problem successfully.

  2. one of the solutions is to disable additional logical processors for the entire operating system, although there may be negative implications on performance.  In this case, try the steps in the lower part of this KB.  I have Windows 7, so I used the utility of command-line bcdedit with no problems.

  3. Finally, a really interesting option that is well worked for me should automatically set the affinity of the processor for each individual process.  There is at least a utility available to achieve this.  I've now changed my LabVIEW 8.6 shortcut to call RunFirst, which sets the processor affinity for LabVIEW to automatically use the first logical processor.  This way I can still use my processor image for all it's worth except in applications that have problems with it.

  I hope this helps someone else out there one day.

  Jim

• Problems of causing classic vista of gel-crash games or force him to leave Windows (vista 64, multi-core)

  I have problems running games on new computer (and some older) on vista 64-bit. Either the game starts to slow down and "jump" a bit, until she (usually) suddenly freezes (also sound), while single force-rotation - in the distance, the computer is the option. Another time a game just leaves for windows where a message arrives "is a problem and the program must be closed. Is this a classic vista problem? The computer is multi-core. Should I upgrade to Win7?

  Hi Mhusoy,

  Welcome to the Microsoft Answers site!

  You have installed the latest drivers for the graphics card?

  Is - what your computer crashes alone while you play games or of otherwise?

  You can if check if the games you try playing are compatible with Windows Vista or not. Follow the link and check the details.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/Windows/compatibility/Windows-Vista/default.aspx

  You try to install the games you play in Windows XP mode and check if you get the same question.

  Run the program compatibility Wizard

  1. Open the program compatibility Wizard by clicking the Start button, click Control Panel, clicking programs, and then clicking use an older with this version of Windows program.
  2. Follow the instructions in the wizard.

  If you are unable to install a program, insert the installation for the program and, using the wizard disk, navigate to the program setup file, usually called Setup.exe, Install.exe, or something similar. The wizard is not designed to work on programs that have an .msi file name extension.

  For more information follow the link below.

  Make older programs in this version of Windows

  Hope this information is useful.

  Amrita M

  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• Subject: Speed video rendering and export in Adobe Premiere CC 2014

  I did some research on this point - and I've read about the different ways to do it - but at the end of the day... my videos still take some time to export (10-minute video will take 30 to 40 minutes to export)

  I recently bought a new MacBook Pro with a 2.5 Quad core i7 processor... 16 GB of ram and an AMD Radeon r9 M370x 2 GB video card.

  Videos should be much faster with this alone, but they go to a slower speed. I know people who have similar videos, treatment within 4-5 minutes.

  Now, the video is filmed in 1980 x 1080, I think... I would like to export to 1280 x 720... There is not much I can do...

  I tried to lower the speed of transmission of about 1, which decreases the size of the spectacular video... and I've even limited to one pass.

  I don't want to sacrifice the extreme video quality to win 2 minutes of processing time (down from 40 minutes to 38 minutes)

  What can I do to speed up rendering and exporting in the sequence settings?

  File > project settings > general.

  Also in the lower right corner of the Adobe Media Encoder queue Panel.

• Keep a clean, safe and very efficient machine...

  Keeping a clean and safe system is equivalent to good performance. How do you do that? There are several things you should do to ensure the best possibility to keep a clean, safe and very efficient machine:

  (1) install anti-malware software

  • There are a few very good available 'Free' programs that are fully automated and will help keep your system protected against malicious software. Some of them are listed here... .click on the link "Free Security Software links Index", then click on the link "Anti-virus".

  (2) safe online practice

  • "" Safe surfing"you really thinking very little. Using common sense can help here. Avoid unscrupulous websites. The "Web Of Trust" help you identify many of those if you CAN avoid the.

  (3) maintenance

  • Maintain your system by performing a disk cleanup and defragmentation on a regular basis.

  Maintenance requires some planning. Your system accumulates debris on the web. "Debris", in the sense that many of these files are not necessary keep.

  Get rid of this debris is a simple process. Microsoft Windows users will find the free utilities provided by Microsoft, in all "platforms", are very useful in helping users keep their systems. Those who are, disk cleanup and Disk Defragmenter. "You can find these tools by going to.
  All Programs--> Accessories--> System Tools

  .. the are friendly and easy to use. However, I would like to clear up some confusion regarding the utility "Defragmenter". Many users will neglect a defragmentation of the system according to the results of analysis. I would like to address the:
  "You don't need to defragment this volume."
  .. .message referring to analysis of defragmentation.

  You see, when Microsoft wrote that the utility for the Windows platform, there are two targets to consider. Those who are home and business users. Two very large markets, with very different "needs". Effort and the goal was to reach a middle ground by estimating the thresholds which would continue to work well for both customer bases without causing performance issues significant for no more, if one or the other duty live of these thresholds.

  If I explained that well, then you might understand that the 'threshold' Microsoft chose for defragmentation utility will report either customer when fragmentation reached... Let's say it's about 20% (I don't really know WHAT it is, but I don't know it's wide enough) and anything under that will be reported as:
  "You don't need to defragment this volume."

  All this means, really, is that you can delay a defragmentation when an analysis of the analysis returns such a message... but that certainly does not mean that you shouldn't defrag.

  As a general rule, I perform a full system defrag when my file fragmentation is over 3%. For me, it's about twice a week. For you, let's say they occur once a month. I don't know, only you, but you have to keep an eye on her (make ita habit) and see how long it takes to know your fragmentation at this level. It can vary greatly, because it depends on the number of files you create or delete and what type of applications that you run in a "normal" user session

  E-mail, for example, is an application (if native or not) that causes the creation and deletion of files on the hard drive. If you use an online email client, think to "from the browser's cache" with regard to the number of emails downloaded and deleted. These are all files that are fragmented, they are on the hard disk, or make up the garbage in the browser cache, makes no difference... it's all the disk space again regardless of how you think of it.

  Remember, even if you have your browser empty the temporary files when you close the value, the size of this file "dump" can waver, in order to clear the cache at the closing, the browser did perform better than the next browser session but does nothing to appease the disk fragmentation.

  You see, if you do this, the system works well on each of its sessions.

  In summary, install anti-virus software, surf safe practice and maintain your computer. Don't forget to clean the disc first, then perform the defragmentation otherwise you will sort the waste so that the free space fragmented and files.

  Keep in mind these principles and your system will perform well give you years of enjoyable computing.

  Great tips! Thanks for sharing.

• WIndows 7 and Server 2008 machines won't remember preferences of network discovery, needs to set every time you start up or wake up.

  Hello

  I was wondering if anyone here could be kind enough to help me solve this situation

  I have two machines Windows 7 and Server 2008 machines remember preferences of network discovery.

  I use the software on the windows server that collects data and information to two windows 7 machines and discover the network is necessary for this purpose

  These machines are set up in an autonomous local network set up as a working group the only other points on the network are none based on PC hardware that fortunately, the server communicates with and reads the data of

  Once network discovery is defined for the network, the system works as expected, but on each startup (or wake up) network discovery is lost and need to be authorized. This is the case at the time windows server 20008 r2 and windows 7

  How can I make these permanent preferences. for that it restarts and re establish communication its self without intervention

  am I missing a setting or if not is there a way I can script the selection preference on each start (/wake) upwards.

  the end user must be able to turn on the system / restart and use it with needing to have any IT / networking of knowledge to the outside to get the system running.

  Thank you for taking the time to read my request

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site and must be placed on Technet or MSDN

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home