Route map!

Similar Questions

• How to set up in the community of the 4-byte ASN route map?

  Hi all

  I want to do AS-prefix for one of my ISPs. I have map route this ISP and when I try to configure 'set the 64704:xxxxxx community' under the route map configuration mode, I get an error (it's 6 figures in my number of ACEs).

  in the configuration guides always mentioned ASN "well known." I found 'set extcommunity rt' but I think, and it seems that is not what I want to achieve.

  so, how can I include 4-byte ASN in my 'community set?

  Thank you

  Hi Ruslan,

  Just to comment on the 4B ASN support - there are a few pitfalls. A the community attribute is a value of 4 b itself. So if you store your own ASN 4B in a community standard, there is no space left in it for the remaining part of the value of the community. As the set community command manipulates only standard communities, it is impossible to use 4B ASN with her. Extended communities could be the solution, because they are long 8B; However, the type of extended community to use is called AS specific BGP extended community and is defined in RFC 5668. Unfortunately, IOS does not seem to take this type of community - and even if it did, your ISP would not seek for it according to the output of BLACKBERRIES from the database. The particular kind of wider community, you tried to use is called road target, and it serves a different purpose.

  That being said, I must say that I clearly don't understand the use of communities as indicated by your neighbor. Note that there are two communities:

  remarks:         64700:ASN - do not announce to AS ASNremarks:         64709:ASN - announce to AS ASN

  They say - do not advertise or advertise, to the ASN such AS specified in the lower part of the community. But how could your ISP perform filtering for an independent arbitrary system there if it isn't directly peering with it? It seems to me that if the ASN here in this description may be made by a defined limited ASN ot want to peer with your ISP and not an ASN preceded. In addition, when you read carefully:

  remarks:         64701:ASN - prepend 1x to AS ASNremarks:         64702:ASN - prepend 2x to AS ASNremarks:         64704:ASN - prepend 4x to AS ASNremarks:         64706:ASN - prepend 6x to AS ASN

  It is said "prefix N times to AS ASN" - but to precede what? And what it means when they say "precede"? I would say that at this point, it would be better to call your ISP and to clarify the precise meaning and operation of these values of the community until we try to find a solution to your needs. It might be possible that these communities leads to a different prepending operation than what we think. Best regards, Peter

• Understand the NAT translation with route map

  Hello

  I try to configure the server EZVPN on SAA and EZVPN client on router 881. I found on the documentation to the NAT translation on the client side

  My confusion is that I should use the deny on the access list statement? If anyone can explain this, enjoy it.

  IP nat inside source overload map route EzVPN1 interface FastEthernet4

  access-list 103 deny ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 103 allow ip 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255 any

  allowed EzVPN1 1 route map
  corresponds to the IP 103

  Hello

  So that's the explanation for the statement "denied" on the ACL for NATing.

  Based on the config, 192.168.3.x here is the network behind your 881 and 192.168.2.x is the network behind the ASA. Let's suppose you're trying to install between 192.168.2.10 and 192.168.3.10. When this package is delivered to the 881, it checks first the characteristics of penetration on the incoming interface (such as the ACL, political, policy-services, etc.) and before checking the 'IPSEC security associations", it checks the NAT configuration.

  Now, your IPSec security association will specify for 192.168.2.x 192.168.3.x traffic to be encrypted and then sent. If we do not have the declaration of 'decline' in the ACL, the 881 will be NAT incoming packets and then the IP source in the package will get changed the IP address of the interface of SA4.

  This match is no longer the configuration of IPSEC SA and therefore not get encrypted. Therefore, we must have the statements 'decline' to ensure that VPN traffic is not coordinated and is therefore correctly.

  Hope this helps!

• Based on the IOS VPN Lan-to-Lan (NAT and route map Questions)

  Hello world

  I worked on my review of CCNA security and I have a question about this stage

  LAN1 192.168.0.0/24---(routeur HQ)--10.10.10.0/30--(INTERNET)--20.20.20.0/30--(routeur Branch) - LAN2 192.168.1.0/24

  I use 10.10.10.0/30 and 20.20.20.0/30 networks assuming that these are public addresses (is just a laboratory).

  I read that if I want to make the VPN tunnel while I using NAT I must exclude valuable traffic from the NAT process so I look on the database of cisco for more help and I found this (look at the 3660 router configuration):

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008045a2d2.shtml#T1

  so, I applied this config for my routers, so the config is:

  IP nat inside source map route sheep interface fastEthernet0/1

  access list 110 deny ip 192.168.0.0. 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access list 119 permit ip 192.168.0.0. 0.0.0.255 any

  sheep allowed 10 route map

  corresponds to the IP 110

  I didn't really understand who is using the command route-map here, so I made this configuration:

  IP nat inside list sheep interface FastEthernet0/1

  sheep extended IP access list

  deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  Licensing ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255 any

  Two of them worked I could translate my LAN addresses to the public to address internet and also could establish the VPN tunnel. So my questions are:

  1. What is the purpose of the road-map command?

  2. What is the difference between these two configuration?

  3. which one I should use and in what cases?

  Thanks in advance

  Jose

  Jose,

  Very good questions and in fact no need to the road map it.

  Personally, I like using course maps because it allows much more flexibility than simply ACL setup, but in order to bypass the NAT source IPs, there is no need of route-maps and you can do this with the ACL directly.

  I personally always use road-maps just because I can (route-maps are cool) haha

  Route-maps are very useful in other scenarios where you need to put more of conditions or factors.

  Remember that it is almost always more than one method to accomplish a task... which is one of those cases.

  It will be useful.

  Federico.

• Newbie question route-map/access-list

  I am quite new to the thing whole cisco here.  I'm very hesitant to make changes as I am not sure that I take down the entire network of 200%. (We are a very small company)

  We have a router cisco 1811 (yes I know its old)

  We now have a road map and I'm trying to understand it to make it work the way we want.  Basically, we have a few servers and we do not want some servers to use our cable internet connection, we want to use our T1.  Our T1 uses an ASA5505 as a router.  I don't know why, I know its not the best practice but I was just hired and that's all I have to say on this subject.  I am doing as a result.  Web traffic currently out our interface cable, everything, including the speed of transfer on speedtest.net out our T1.  This makes the bad, bad VoIP phone calls. We also have a tunnel punch in Q1 of our other offices as well as our server Exchange2010 using T1.   If our cable goes down, everything for the T1 (by design).  We have a long list of defined access our route map - use corresponding ip.  I want to change the access list to not allow local network IP addresses.  I know that if I put in a whole ip allow it break our network and nothing comes out of the T1 line, and no one can get to our mail server more.  So, I was thinking of adding some statements, but I was wondering if someone could help me with logic, so I know not if I will break the network.  I wouldn't pull the laminated cord and use the console.  (I really need get a USB serial interface).  Now, you understand a little more about my situation now for all numbers, etc.

  Network internal 90.0.0.0/24, 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.30.0/24, 172.20.0.0/16 (we use only 40 addresses, why they chose 16 is beyond me, stupid really)

  PTP VPN: 192.168.116.0/24 comes and goes out our T1.

  1811 router: 90.0.0.254/192.168.30.254/192.168.0.254

  ASA: 90.0.0.50

  !

  follow the accessibility of ALS 40 ip 40

  delay the decline 90 60

  !

  interface Vlan1

  Description * INTERFACE LAN 90.0.0.x network * $FW_INSIDE$

  IP 90.0.0.254 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside

  IP virtual-reassembly

  IP tcp adjust-mss 1452

  route WEBPBR card intellectual property policy

  !

  interface Vlan10

  Description * INTERFACE LAN NET 192.168.0.x * $FW_INSIDE$

  IP 192.168.0.254 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside

  IP helper 90.0.0.2

  IP virtual-reassembly

  route WEBPBR card intellectual property policy

  !

  ! Static routes

  IP forward-Protocol ND

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 90.0.0.50 track 20

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 197.164.245.109 200

  IP route 8.8.8.8 255.255.255.255 197.164.245.109 permanent

  IP route 10.250.10.0 255.255.255.0 90.0.0.50 permanent

  IP route 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 90.0.0.50 permanent

  IP route 208.67.220.220 255.255.255.255 197.164.245.109 permanent

  WEBTRAFFIC extended IP access list
  deny ip any host 208.67.222.222
  deny ip any 172.20.0.0 0.0.255.255
  refuse the host tcp 90.0.0.2 any eq www
  refuse 90.0.0.14 tcp host any eq www
  refuse 90.0.0.235 tcp host any eq www
  refuse the host ip 192.168.0.40 everything
  deny ip any host 192.168.0.40
  refuse the host ip 192.168.0.41 all
  deny ip any host 192.168.0.41
  deny ip any host 192.168.0.221
  refuse the host ip 192.168.0.221 all
  refuse the host ip 192.168.0.225 all
  refuse 90.0.0.10 tcp host any eq www
  deny ip any host 192.168.0.225
  refuse 90.0.0.11 tcp host any eq www
  refuse 90.0.0.9 tcp host any eq www
  refuse 90.0.0.8 tcp host any eq www
  refuse 90.0.0.7 tcp host any eq www
  refuse 90.0.0.6 tcp host any eq www
  refuse the 90.0.0.1 tcp host any eq www
  refuse 90.0.0.13 tcp host any eq www
  refuse 90.0.0.200 tcp host any eq www
  permit tcp any any eq www
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.131 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.130 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.132 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.133 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.134 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.135 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.136 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.137 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.138 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.139 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.140 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.141 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.142 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.143 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.144 a
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.145 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.146 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.147 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.148 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.149 one
  allow the host ip 192.168.0.150 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.80 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.81 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.82 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.83 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.84 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.85 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.86 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.87 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.88 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.89 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.90 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.91 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.92 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.93 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.94 one
  allow the host ip 90.0.0.95 one
  refuse the host tcp 90.0.0.3 any eq www

  ALS IP 40

  208.67.220.220 ICMP echo source interface Vlan1

  Timeout 6000

  frequency 20

  ALS annex IP 40 life never start-time now

  allowed WEBPBR 2 route map

  corresponds to the IP WEBTRAFFIC

  set ip next-hop to check the availability of the 197.164.245.109 1 track 40

  That is how we have it set up right now.  If I put in a few lines above WEBTRAFFIC with:

  deny ip any 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip any 90.0.0.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip any 192.168.116.0 0.0.0.255

  !  Etc with all internal networks

  * And then put at the bottom:

  allow an ip

  who will ALL break so we can not communicate with anything?  Or is that what I did to do this, we get internal routing etc.?  Also, I guess I'd put in 15 IP addresses that are coming in the SAA as well?  (We have public IPS 14 (one for the T1 gateway) that would go as well?)  I don't want to try to put in those at the top and make sure no one can do anything.  I hope I made clear what I'm doing...

  Post edited by: Ryan Young

  I have not read this thread well enough to be able to talk to the intricacies of the issue whether this access will make what you want. But I can answer the specific question you are asking. Yes - the access list is top-down, transformed and if a few more top line in the access list matches, then treatment for this package will not get the license at the bottom of the access list.

  HTH

  Rick

• route-map command

  Hello

  I try to configure the router to router ipsec tunnel, but I don't understant what of the command:

  "road-map sheep permit 10.

  Can someone explain it to me clearly?

  Regars

  It is there so that if you perform tunneling split that IE don't no nat on to the list of internet access that you set. You must follow this command with a "match ip address".

• How to get the google - a route map?

  I have a google map that I included in a mobile site, when you click on the link that includes the latitude and longitude of the destination, it opens google maps, but it does not recognize the current location to create the directions from, though even I have the settings on my mobile device configured to allow the location.   Can you please help me find a way to get it so the person responsible for the search of the site can click on driving directions button that I put in place and it will calculate, for them, indications of their current location to the defined destination.

  Thank you!

  set up your route in google

  

  Click on the menu item and select share & embed map.

  Choose the short URL

  Copy the URL address

  

  In Muse, create a static image (maybe a graph of google map or what ever you decide to design) to use as the link and paste the code.

  Note: using the Google map widget Muse does not work for what you need to do.

  

• Attempt to create overlay route map with...

  Hi all

  I am trying to create a route for the updated plan overlay direct semi. Currently, I'm trying to understand how the game a value in pixels in the command ForeignWindow transperant so I can draw my lines inside, then superimpose on mapview. It appers that the only possible pixel values available are between 0 and 255, which leads me to believe the transparency with this control is not always possible because with this limit, I can even clone the image under my control.

  Is there a way I can manually pull on any other control to achieve the desired effect?

  Kind regards

  -J

  Pixels have an RGBA value, where RGB is the color between 1 and 255, and A is the alpha value, carried out by Alpha Composition. For each pixel and it associated the pointer, R = [point], G = [pointer + 1], B [pointer + 2] = and a = [pointer + 3]. Focus on changing the alpha value of your pixels.

  On a side note, I tried to do a very similar thing on another project. I don't know that it is possible, in some way, with a bitmap image.

• iOS9 send route map of the iPhone iPad

  How to send an itinerary from my iPad to my iPhone, or save it in the cloud? Now, I want to talk about a place I pinned drop, not an address I can easily grasp. Address, it is not everywhere wherever I'm going.

  On the app - side or nearby search box must be a share button - the square with the arrow coming out on top

  Tap on that and there should be an option to send to your phone

  (I'm on a Mac right now, and that's how it is on the Mac)

• WS-C3750G-12 s with c3750-ipservicesk9 - mz.122 - 53.SE2 will not apply for route interface map VLAN

  I'm not able to implement a roadmap for an interface VLAN on this three switch layer.

  Switch:

  WS-C3750G-12 S

  IOS:

  C3750-ipservicesk9 - mz.122 - 53.SE2

  Route map Config:

  access-list 151 allow the host ip 10.1.0.11 everything

  !

  TEST allowed 10 route map

  corresponds to the IP 151

  set ip jump following x.x.x.x (Public IP)

  Used command.

  interface VLAN2

  IP route-matches of TEST strategies

  I also do a show run all | I have the interface Vlan 2 and there is no config hidden for this too.  Does not support this version of IOS.

  I suspect it's because your other switches in the stack are not 3750-12s switch?

  3750-12s switch running the model of aggregation by default but all other 3750 s cannot run office model.

  Then on the master can try this-

  "sdm prefer routing Office."

  and then charge again.

  Jon

• Amtrak Train map tracking: not allowed to use Google Maps Client ID

  Amtrak introduced a card to follow up on their Web site at http://www.amtrak.com/train-routes.

  To access this feature by clicking on the "Get followed now > > >" link (Javascript required), a Google with Amtrak routes map begins to display, and then stops. A dialog box error including 'this site is not allowed to use the Google Maps provided client ID,' is displayed.

  This feature to function correctly on Internet Explorer 10 and even own Google browser Chrome. The only browser in which it fails is Firefox. I upgraded FF23 FF24 without change. I tried a restart of the FF24 in Mode safe... no change. I disabled and enabled Java, Flash, Silverlight without change.

  Firefox 24.0 on Windows 7 64 bit.

  Hello GP49,.

  Some Firefox problems can be solved by performing a clean reinstall. This means that you remove Firefox program files, and then reinstall Firefox. Please follow these steps:

  Note: You can print these steps or consult them in another browser.

  1. Download the latest version of Firefox from http://www.mozilla.org office and save the installer to your computer.
  2. Once the download is complete, close all Firefox Windows (click on quit in the file menu or Firefox).
  3. Remove the Firefox installation folder, which is located in one of these locations, by default:
     • Windows:
       • C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox
       • C:\Program Files (x 86) \Mozilla Firefox
     • Mac: Delete Firefox in the Applications folder.
     • Linux: If you have installed Firefox with the distribution-based package manager, you must use the same way to uninstall: see Install Firefox on Linux. If you have downloaded and installed the binary package from the Firefox download page, simply remove the folder firefox in your home directory.
  4. Now, go ahead and reinstall Firefox:
     1. Double-click on the downloaded Setup file and go through the steps in the installation wizard.
     2. Once the wizard is completed, click to open Firefox directly after clicking the Finish button.

  Please report back to see if this helped you!

  Thank you.

• Help setting up a router Cisco 871 for home...

  871

  Hello Andrew,.

  Alain you provided the entire configuration of what you asked, but I think you also need to configure NAT in order to access internet from PC LAN.

  Reason for this is that get you the WAN IP address and default route ISP, for example:

  IP: 10.0.0.1

  Mask: 255.255.255.0

  Gateway: 10.0.0.254

  But your ISP guess you connect only a single PC, so only 10.0.0.1 IP address will have access to the internet. ISP will pass all traffic of 192.168.10.0/24 and 192.168.20.0/24 because these networks are unknown to the ISP. You will need to NAT your internal networks to your WAN IP 10.0.0.1.

  Here is the configuration:

  NAT_ACL extended IP access list

  deny ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255

  permit ip 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 any

  ip licensing 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 any

  refuse an entire ip

  NAT_MAP route map
  

  corresponds to the IP NAT_ACL

  IP nat inside source overload map route NAT_MAP interface FastEthernet4

  interface Vlan10

  IP nat inside

  interface Vlan20

  IP nat inside

  interface FastEthernet4

  NAT outside IP

  Last thing, it is not necessary, but maybe you want to prevent users of VLANS to access your internal network:

  Restrict_GUESTS extended IP access list

  deny ip 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255

  ip licensing 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 any

  refuse an entire ip

  interface Vlan20

  IP access-group Restrict_GUESTS in

  Best regards

  Please note all useful messages and close issues resolved

• Loopback address VRF who flees to the global routing table

  Hello

  I have a router and you have set up several VRF. I was also able to run routes between the global routing table and one of the VRF (VRF data) with success.

  Now, I have not been able to flee the VRF (1.1.1.1) data loopback address in the global routing table, so I can ping to the VRF the global routing table loopback address.

  I also read this article:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk436/tk832/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080231a3e.shtml

  Does anyone know this before?

  Joined the config

  Thank you

  Reza

  If select VRF is not supported, you can create a false road map and apply it to the loopback interface:

  FAKE route map

  vrf adjustment data

  !

  int loopback 0

  FAKE IP policy-map of route

  receive data IP vrf

  !

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/iOS/MPLS/configuration/guide/mp_vpn_vrf_select_rt_ps6441_TSD_Products_Configuration_Guide_Chapter.html

  HTH

  Laurent.

• [SOLVED] Problem with the ACB and InterVLAN routing

  Hello.

  I have Cisco 3750 G with IOS k9 - mz.150 - 2.SE4 Service of intellectual property. In my network, I have 4 VLANs with 4 internet gateways. I have set 4 static route for each gateways and with PBR to match this static routes. If I use "set ip next-hop" all traffic goes through the specific gateway interVlan routing does not work (I need to because the customers interVlan routing in different VLANS must be), and if I use 'set ip default next-hop', I was incapable of it attributed to Vlan (road-map lan14 not supported based on routing strategies).

  Model SDM is on the road that ip Routing is enabled.

  Here is my config for 2 of these VLANS:

  interface Vlan7
  IP 192.168.7.254 255.255.255.0
  IP access-group 107 to
  !
  interface Vlan14
  IP 192.168.14.254 255.255.255.0
  IP access-group 114 to
  !
  IP http server
  IP http secure server
  !
  !
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.70.254
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.140.254
  !
  access-list 107 permit udp any eq bootpc any eq bootps
  access-list 107 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 any

  access-list 114 permit udp any eq bootpc any eq bootps
  access-list 114 allow ip 192.168.14.0 0.0.0.255 any

  lan7 allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 107
  IP 192.168.70.254 jump according to the value
  !

  lan14 allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 114
  IP 192.168.140.254 jump according to the value

  !

  Where is my error in config?

  Please help me, I'm stuck here almost three weeks.

  Hello

  You have created courses 2-card to set the next hop for a portion of the traffic classified with an acl.

  If you want any other traffic manager you must create an empty instance of your roadmap

  Example:

  lan7 allowed 10 route map

  football game...

  map of route allowed lan7 20 ==> Add this instance and leave it empty. You say the switch/router that he must refrain from other traffic but nothing to apply.

  Hope that this clear.

• Static/OSPF Redistribution fails for specific Routes

  Hello

  I have an ASA which is redistribution of static routes in OSPF with a standard access list and a roadmap (seq 10). For the most part, it works very well, however I have a problem where some networks will not redistribute.

  I have a network summary, 172.16.0.0/16 which is redistributed. Another network 172.16.1.0/24 will not redistribute. Other networks like 10.0.0.0/24 will redistribute without any problem.

  I tried to add a list of prefixes to the Roadmap (seq 5) as a test, with 172.16.1.0/24 as the only authorized route, but there is no change.

  When I look into the ospf on the peer OSPF (Nexus 5 k) database, the synthetic route is present, but the more specific route is not.

  I do not use any route filtering and no route-maps / ACL / prefix lists are set to deny.

  Is there a reason that the ASA redistribute a more specific route in OSPF?

  Thank you

  Hello!

  Share your config of ASA, its IP routing table and content LSDB please. In general, if you have redistributed summary, the specific routes referred to in this summary are not required to be redistributed and/or announced.