Rule below refers

Similar Questions

• "What is the meaning of the rule of the O-Cluster" [(-160714); 18095.1] "< = PER_MONTH_PAY < ="196904.

  Hello gurus

  I use O-Cluster to a cluster client, get the rules below

  ' [(-160714);]. 18095.1]"< = PER_MONTH_PAY < ="196904. "

  There is no record that PER_MONTH_PAY = 18095.1, I can't understand what this expression, pls help.

  Hello

  OCluster rules make use of the notation mathematics range.

  To learn more about the notation, see the following links:

  https://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Interval_%28mathematics%29

  http://StackOverflow.com/questions/4396290/what-does-this-square-bracket-and-parenthesis-bracket-notation-mean-First1-last

  http://zonalandeducation.com/MMTS/miscellaneousMath/intervalNotation/intervalNotation.html

  -160714 > PER_MONTH_PAY<=>

  OCluster was put in a cell in this column, that's why you see intervals in the rules.

  Here is a brief technical explanation of OCluster binning and the mapping to the rules:

  Description:

  Initially, we generate rules for ferries. Like 1<= x=""><=>

  The 1 and 5 here are bin ID for the attribute 'x '. (Cut for the x attribute values in different trays)

  After that, we did a real bin IDs in the range remapping say 1 <=>'[0;. '. 855346]"and 5"(9.40881 <=>; 10.2642].

  which finally gives us the rule "[0."; 855346].<= x=""><= "(9.40881;="">

  The rule "[0;." 855346].<= x=""><= "(9.40881;="" 10.2642]"="" actually="" means="" 0=""><= x=""><=>

  The rule "[0;." 152381].<= y=""><= "(1.06667;="" 1.21905]"="" means="" 0=""><= y=""><=>

  THX, mark

• Data Currency Adjustment of entity are not copy through rule when we used the value source as "ECT."

  Hi all

  Data Currency Adjustment of entity are not copied through rule when we try to copy the data from one entity to another entity for the same account if the account is to have only the data entity Currency Adjustment but rule the data copied correctly when the entity is to have Exchange entity adjustments and currency of the entity.

  Wrote the rule to copy the values from the source account ' entity currencies Total "to target the currency of the account"entity ". Rule works as follows:

  1. If the source account's currency of the entity and entity Currency Adjustment, total value ECT (EC + ECA) copy correctly to currency of the entity to the target account. -OK

  2. If the source account's single currency entity (has no entity value Currency Adjustment) then under rule copy data properly to account currency of the target entity.  -OK

  3 but if the source account has only entity Exchange adjustments (has no value of currency of the entity) and then under rule is not copy of account currency of the entity of the target data. -Requirement

  Could you please see the rule below and please suggest possible solution to copy the Court of Auditors with the help of ECT when the source account has only ECA.

  If Hs.Entity.Member = "120006_ALTER" and HS. Value.Member = "Currency entity of <>" Then

  HS = IS_Account. Account.List ("NetProfit", "[Basic]")

  For each Account1A in IS_Account

  Set dataUnit HS =. OpenDataUnit ("E #120006.A #" & Account1A & ".") W #YTD")

  numItems = dataUnit.GetNumItems

  If numItems > 0 Then

  For I = 0 to numItems-1

  Call dataUnit.GetItem (I, vAcct, ACIP, vCust1, vCust2, vCust3, vCust4, AllocAmt)

  If AllocAmt <>0 then

  GSA Exp "A #" & Account1A & "=" & _

  «E #120006.V # < entity Curr Total >.» "A #" & Account1A

  End If

  Next

  End If

  Next

  End If

  Thank you

  Mahesh

  I thank very you much for the quick response. I tried with the above but no luck.

• Rules HFM - function CustomTop

  Hello

  Can someone please help me understand the following block of code? My understanding of this block of code is that aList is equal to base all members dimenision account. For each of the selected members of the account, browse aList identified to add the specified in a list of members, where the end of aUD amount is 'END'. If I'm wrong, someone can correct me? Can you please also explain how the CustomTop function is under development as a rule below?

  HS = aList. Account.List ("", "[Basic]")

  For each aItem in aList

  HS = aUD. Account.CustomTop (aItem, "Test")

  If right (aUD, 3) = "END" Then

  HS. AddMemberToList aItem

  End If

  Next

  Thank you

  Hello

  In short:

  1. Loops through the core accounts (list is called aList and individual account treated aItem)
  2. Registers the Member CustomTop of a (aItem) account for the size of Test in the variable aUD
  3. If the CustomTop for the size of Test ends with the END letters, adds the account to the list of members.

  The CustomTop is a property of account in the metadata that retrieves the CustomTop function.

  See you soon

• New groups of DRS and rules, would avoid vMotion Storm

  DRS groups and rules below look good to present our cluster that has never had one?

  Our current cluster of business (20 hosts running ESXi 5.5U2) does not have rules of DRS in place.  I'd like to introduce five new nodes in this cluster, but I don't want (fully automated) DRS to move our critical production VMs to these five nodes until they are sufficiently burned in.  We want only our critical VMs not filing migrate to these new nodes for the moment.

  DRS Group Manager

  1. Create two 'DRS Host groups':
     1. the VM guests
     2. new guest VM
  2. Create two 'DRS VM groups':
     1. production critical VMs
     2. VMs critics off-production

  Here are the screenshots of the DRS rules that I've not enabled yet.  DRS will attempt to overhaul all of the critical production VMs (1000 VMs) on these existing hosts or will he see that they already exist on these hosts and left alone?  It will be graciously vMotion 100 critical VMs off-production for the new guests I bring in this cluster?  I would like to avoid creating chaos by making the production of 1000 reviews VMs dragging around the existing VM guests.

  

  With these two rules configured as 'must' of the rules, and all virtual machines running on the 'existing VM hosts', I expect that DRS will start the migration of the 'non-production critical VMs' as soon as rules are enabled. What do I usually when DRS rules configuration is to temporarily put the DRS on "Manual", set / add the rules and then go to the DRS tab see small jets DRS recommend after pressing the button "execute DRS. If the recommendations of the DRS me correspond to the expectations, I then the DRS automatic value again and let her work with DRS.

  André

• Paragraph rules - does not display in PDF format

  Hello

  Please find shared PDF created from InDesign using the rule of paragraph Above/Below. The gray color you see has a continuous black line above it. Unfortunately, it will appear in the PDF file when I ZOOM it. However, if I create a line using the AVC functionality and place above grey box it seems very well (see the upper area in the same PDF file). I can't go with approach to race that causes the hard manual work. Please tell us how to fix.

  Here's the link PDF https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7-E8BeUp3OjTXBxUFhoTjZTQVU/edit?usp=sharing

  Best wishes

  Simo

  Even a pt regle.5 must be heavy enough to show.

  I wonder if the problem is that the rule abve is being hidden by the rule below. It seems to me that rule below drawn on the above rule, so you should be able to Exchange and change the offsets to look the same. The fact that aid.

• ¿Possible to place the paragraph "rule" under blank spaces?

  Is it possible to place the paragraph "rule" under the blank spaces?

  FYI, I have write equations using tables and a horizontally split cell to hold the numerator (top) and the denominator (bottom). If the numberator has fewer characters than the denominator, the division (in my case, the "rule") bar is too narrow.  I would like to add spaces before and after the numberator to the rule to match with the denominator, giving the equation looks nice. Spaces before the text of numberator carry a rule, but not spaces AFTER the text of numberator - hard spaces, or em-spaces, nor space en dash, or any other I can find. (Using the line of background cells as the dividing line does not work for my project.)  Thanks in advance.

  You should be able to underline one space, but why not use a real rule below? You can set on the desired width of column to any withdrawal, regardless of the characters in the line.

• Put a gap in an article below

  Hello

  Whenever I draw a shape that requires rules below (e.g. Name___ Address___), I often need to have a gap in the rule below. For example, I could have State___ Zip___ on a single line, but seems to be forced to insert a small table here in order to get this gap. There must be an easier way! If you know how to create a gap in the rule, which then starts again a little later on the same line, I would be very grateful if you could share!

  Thank you
  Trina

  My suggestion is to create tabs on the lines where you have to swerve and you have more than one field to fill. Here is an example:

  

  If you look at the ruler of the tab, you see that I add a rule by a tab aligned to the right, using the underscore as the leader of the tab character. Then I place the following by a left-aligned tab, then the rule with a right-aligned tab and the tab leader underscores.

• BR of planning does not work but I get a msg "Business Rule has been executed successfully"

  Description of the problem: we have a form that has periods as the dimension of the column, the activity and the entity for the dimension of row
  There are deletion of lack of blocks and the lack of data on the dimensions of the line
  
  We have a business rule to allow combinations of activities/entity so that people can see on the form and put the data in relation to it. It does this by putting a zero for the last period so that the combi row is deleted is no longer
  
  He worked for a year or two without any problems
  Recently, we had the problem where we run this business rule, and we get the message saying that it has successfully managed...
  However, this is not true since if I check the zero or another number is not done... Occasionally, the rule will be as work as expected to and put the number zero / in
  Usually we run the rule of a menu in a form of planning. But I also tried the rule running via EAS
  
  I created a new rule that has been simplified to the maximum, and yet I still get the same error
  The two rules below
  
  Any ideas how to debug this
  
  Thank you
  
  PRI
  
  PS: I am running Hyperion Planning 9.3.1.1.8
  
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  New rule
  ----------------------------------
  
  /**************************************************************************
  
  Create new project split activity
  -J' changed the rule so that I'm fixing sparse and 'If' on dense simplify as much as possible only and also simplified
  IE hard coded variables etc... See Code below
  
  ***************************************************************************/
  SET CREATEBLOCKONEQ
  UPDATECALC OFF SET;
  
  Fix("FCST","CurrVer","FY11","S000","E234-00000")
  
  FIX ("CA_DEL44")
  
  
  ("Proj_Hours"
  
  / * Assign value to variable, where there is already a value * /.
  
  / * Dept value equal to zero to create the block if there is already a value * /.
  IF ("Proj_Hours"-> "Mar" == #Missing)
  'Proj_Hours'-> 'Mar' = 1;
  ENDIF
  
  'Proj_Hours'-> 'Mar' = 2;
  
  )
  
  ENDFIX
  
  ENDFIX
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Rule of origin
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  /**************************************************************************
  Create new activity project split - original Code
  ***************************************************************************/
  SET CREATEBLOCKONEQ
  UPDATECALC OFF SET;
  VAR _var;
  
  DIFFICULTY ("TransCanada", "CurrVer", FcstYear & FcstMonths, "S000", [SLrtpSourceDept])
  
  Fix ("Proj_Hours")
  [SLrtpChargeableActivity] (
  @CALCMODE (TOPDOWN);
  / * Assign value to variable, where there is already a value * /.
  _var = [SLrtpChargeableActivity];
  / * Dept value equal to zero to create the block if there is already a value * /.
  IF(_var ==#missing)
  [SLrtpChargeableActivity] = 1;
  ENDIF
  
  )
  
  @IDESCENDANTS ("billable activities");
  
  ENDFIX
  ENDFIX
  
  Published by: 789458 on March 8, 2011 06:43
  
  Published by: 789458 on March 8, 2011 06:47

  For your new rule:
  When you try to create the block on a dense dimension, use SET CREATENONMISSINGBLK ON; rather than SET ON CREATEBLOCKONEQ;
  You can try to move the month in the instruction of fix in the new rule just to check if it makes a difference if the original one does not work.

• Rules of procedure and decision reports

  Hello
  
  Let's say I have a rule of procedure such as this:
  

  The interview is complete if
     The person's name is known and
     It is known whether or not the person is eligible for a benefit

  and I have add this rule my goal in summary screen.
  
  Now, important goal that interests me is, of course, if the person is eligible for a benefit. I won't see "the interview is over", but rather just "Peter is not eligible for a benefit" in the record of decision (if the name of the person is Peter). How can I accomplish this?
  
  Thank you
  Jussi

  Elements of the summary screen can be hidden based on rules. Here are a few ideas off the top of my head. You may need to play with that for your particular needs.

  I used the purpose attribute procedural (the interview is over) and the attribute of objective of eligibility (the person is eligible for the benefit) to the summary screen.

  For the procedural objective I make poster / enabled by default and then use this visibility below rule to control when it should be hidden. Note When you set the goal of visibility to the summary screen item, put you the positive version of the goal of visibility attribute in the configuration of the screen (i.e. "the interview is completed goal must appear on the summary screen '). What this will do, is have the lens procedure poster (for which was set as the default behavior), but when the rule below is met (i.e. when the interview is over), this element of the summary screen will be hidden.

  the interview is completed objective should not appear on the summary screen, if
  the interview is over

  Then for the purpose of eligibility, I hid it by default and set the following rule of visibility to control when displaying.

  the objective of eligibility must be displayed on the summary screen if
  the interview is over

  Take a look at the article help the OPM "Hide, display and disable an element of screen interview", especially the section 'control the visibility of the elements of the summary screen' for more details.

  See you soon,.
  Jasmine

• The rules behind the text. How can I get rid of them?

  Help! -J' have rules that are behind a type in the text box. CS4. Can not know how to remove it. It's a customer provided fileI so I don't really know how it was built. I like to think, I'm not completely stupid, but I feel pretty stupid. Help, please.

  If it is a net of paragraph, and then with the selected text, go to the paragraph Panel flyout > nets of paragraph and check to see if the ' above ' or "Rule below" is a rule applied. If so, deselect rule on.

• Mysterious incorporated rules

  I'm kinda a newbie in InDesign. I have a form to change and I can't work on the way in which the rules were seized.

  For example:

  Name___________________

  In fact, the rule extends all the way under the word 'Name' and all the way to the end of the text block. It is not underscore. It's not a net of paragraph. It is not a physically comic rule.

  If I insert a return and start typing a new line, which also has a rule below.

  The same technique seems to have been used elsewhere to get a white type on a red background.

  In Quark, I would have used "rule below", but I guess the equivalent of ID is a 'paragraph net' and that turns off. I need to reproduce this effect - ideas of how it has been achieved?

  Thanks for your suggestions...

  Emma

  InDesign offers no not one, but two types of nets of paragraph: one below and one above. The default selection in the paragraph Rule dialog box exceeds the 'rule' and the check box beside it is not checked, if it is not. But also check the other: choose 'Rule' down in the drop-down list and chances are is on.

  Reversed type trick is usually done by making the rule below as thick as the leader of the text and it moving to appear exactly behind the text.

• Change the business rule

  Hello
  
  I have the size of the queue. Members below may contain one of the three attribute values(Email,chat,voice). If the attribute of the queue is the cat, my concurrency (member) must be fixed by default with 1. But when the user changes the it, the value must be the same as entered by the user but cannot have zero. But even when the value is entered as 5 by the user, the value is getting replaced as 1. Something wrong in the rule below?
  
  Fix ([RTP_Rev_Location], [RTP_Rev_Program], [RTP_Rev_Queue], [RTP_Rev_Scenario], [RTP_rev_Version])
  Fix (@Attribute (Chat_Queue))
  'Competition '.
  (IF (<>#missing 'Competition' AND 'Competition' <>0))
  'Competition' = 'competition '.
  ON THE OTHER
  'Competition' = 1;
  ENDIF ;)
  ENDFIX
  ENDFIX
  
  Kind regards
  Brig.

  Hello

  Below could be:

  Fix ([RTP_Rev_Location], [RTP_Rev_Program], [RTP_Rev_Queue], [RTP_Rev_Scenario], [RTP_rev_Version])

  'Competition '.
  (
  IF (@ISATTRIBUTE (Chat_Queue) AND ("Concurrency" is #missing OR 'Competition' == 0))
  'Competition' = 1;
  ENDIF;
  )
  ENDFIX

• Reusing the validation rule

  Gurus,
  
  We have a requirement in our project, where we need rules of reusable validatoin. Is there a way?
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  Yes it is. You must create a custom validation rule.

  To do this, select your project template and invoke the New Gallery.

  File-> new-> ADF business components-> Valdiation rule.

  Enter a name for your java class, and then click ok.

  In your class validateValue method, you can enter validation rules. Assume that you use the Tables Emp and you must validate if Ename is equal to "xyz".

  Then in the value of validate method:

   public boolean validateValue(Object value) {
  
          EntityImpl emp = (EntityImpl)value;
          if(emp.getAttribute("ename").toString().equals("xyz")){
              return true;
          }
          return false;
      }
  

  If you need a custom error message, you can:

      public void validate(JboValidatorContext ctx) {
          if (!validateValue(ctx.getNewValue())) {
              throw new ValidationException("project1.ValidationRuleImpl1 validation failed");
          }
      }
  

  Save your validation rule in the IDE:

  1. create an ADF library Jar out of your project file.
  2 deploy the library.
  3 call - tools-> preferences-> business components-> save the rules-> Pick library-> select your library that you have deployed and give it a name.

  Now whenever you call the rule validtion in flat EO Editor, dialog box you will see the rule below all of the other rules. It will be available in any project.

  Thank you.

• ASDM ACL Manager

  Can you please tell me, or tell me where I can learn, "what is the difference between windows"Access rules"and the"Manager of the ACL", what is the purpose for each of them having in ASDM ASDM, are they related (updates I make in one do not seem to appear in the other), and critical issues like these?

  Sorry, this might be intuitive to most, but unfortunately, not me. I appreciate any help anyone could offer. TIA

  Access rules:

  You can use access mode routed and transparent rules firewall to control IP traffic. An access rule allows or denies the trafficbased on the Protocol, a source and destination or network IP address and optionally the source and destination ports. To allow all traffic to enter the security apparatus, you must attach an inbound interface access rule. Otherwise, the security apparatus automatically deletes all traffic entering this interface.

  Consult the rules below URL for ASDM:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASDM/6_1/user/guide/aclrules.html#wp1132996

  The ACL Manager:

  The Manager of ACL dialog box allows you to set access control lists (ACL) to control access to a network to another host/network, including the Protocol or port that can be used or a specific host.

  You can configure the ACL (Access Control Lists) to apply to user sessions. These are filters which allow or deny users access to specific networks, subnets, hosts and web servers.

  •If you do not all filters set, all connections are allowed.

  •The security appliance supports only an inbound ACL to an interface.

  •At the end of each ACL, there is an implicit, unwritten rule that denies all traffic that is not allowed. If traffic is not explicitly permitted by an access control entry (ACE), the security apparatus denying it. ACEs are referred to as rules in this topic.

  See the below URL for ASDM ACL Manager:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/asa80/asdm60/user/guide/vpn_gen.html#wp1106725