Run parse % is low

Similar Questions

• Memory running at a lower frequency

  I recently added 1 GB 667 DDR2 ram to my office, a1514in Pavilion (previously 1 GB 667 stick). But now the bios is show my DRAM frequency as 266 MHz (PC2-4200), these are the cases with different configs:

  -If I put only OLD stick of 1 GB 333 MHz (PC2-5300) show

  -If I put only NEW stick of 1 GB it will show 266 MHz (PC2-4200)

  -If I put both OLD & NEW 1 GB stick will show at 266 MHz (PC2-4200)

  Has also tried different machines slot but no use (I have only 2 slots and memory support for my system max is 2GB BIOS version 3.24)

  I am not able to understand what the problem is. In CPU - Z under the SPD, the two sticks are showing similar settings (I have not so good idea on these parameters). Please help me why the new RAM runs at a lower frequency... What should I do?

  Hello Khot
  
  What is the model of your Samsung of RAM stick?
  
  According to the specifications of your motherboard RAM supported, speed isn't PC2-4200 and PC2-5300.
  
  Another thing, usually by mixing different RAM is a bad idea. The reasoning is that each RAM stick is intended to be run at a specific frequency, timings and voltage. If two sticks use different frequencies, timings, tensions that the BIOS will be all run the highest common denominator. In your case, that your new stick of RAM PC2-4200 and, therefore, the BIOS reads your second stick is run at the same speed for stability purposes.

• HP Elitebook RAM running frequency values lower than possible hardware (factory setting)

  As part of the upgrade of RAM (from 4 GB to 8 GB) on my HP Elitebook 8560W, I did several tests to find out what type of RAM to my PC a. I was surprised that my RAM (Samsung, PC3-10600 DDR3 SDRAM SO-DIMM) runs only on 666 MHz = 6.67 * 99.8 MHz (9-9-9-24 calendar, 1.50 V voltage).

  However, the factory often supposed to be 1 333 MHz. RAM How can I set correct values of RAM clock 1 333 MHz?

  More info: updating my BIOS: 68SVD worm. F.42; 07/15/2013 Motherboard: HP 1631 & Chipset: Intel QM67 (Cougar Point) (B3)

  If you need additional information, feel free to ask me questions.

  Thank you in advance for your help!

  Since your stick of ram is a Double Data Rate (DDR3) as any other RAM sticks of today, its actual frequency still shows 2 times less.  What you see is correct.   In the past, SDRam yielded 1 data at each clock, with DDR ram, 2 the data are transferred to each clock (hz), so the performance is doubled = equivalent to twice the frequency.  Two-channel will accelerate the transfer of ram using two sticks at the same time, but you can still see 666 mhz cpu - z.

  Been built several computers game, when I set the frequency in bios to the right pair, it always show 2 x less, don't worry!   PS.  I have 1600 mhz DDR3 sticks and show 801,3 mhz of CPU - z.

  In ADDITION, if you upgrade your ram, so that they can operate in dual channel, be sure to buy a stick of the same size (4 GB), frequency (1333 mhz), calendar (9-9 - 9-24) and voltage (1.50 V).  Those who should be easy to find.  It is always better to buy Kit with two since they are tested to work exactly the same, there may be difference of manufacturing between brands and models, but it shouldn't matter much if these 4 parameters are the same.  If you buy a lower frequency stick, the other fits than slower.  If possible, buy one of the same brand to be absolubly that they match (Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9)

  The BIOS * could * be reflashed at a CV not a compatible with your motherboard, but there are a lot of risks for this purpose, up to an unusable computer (motherboard will need to be removed and would need a new BIOS chip, a reprogrammed chip probably welded or a new motherboard).  That's what tells the computer parts, how to work with each other.  Also, your computer will be out of warranty.  You don't need it to be since your ram is working as expected.

  A lot of information here: http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/Everything-You-Need-To-Know-About-DDR-DDR2-and-DDR3-Memories/167

  And here: http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/Everything-You-Need-to-Know-About-the-Dual-Triple-and-Quad-Channel-Memory-Architectures/133

  

• Pavilion 15 PC laptop 15-n004TX. Ubuntu "the system is running in mode low grphics.

  HP Pavilion 15 PC laptop 15-n004TX. It came with ubuntu. 1 GB Radeon grphics card.

  I reinstalled ubuntu 14.04 completely formatted drive. After installation, on reboot, it gives the error:

  "The system is running in low graphics mode.

  Your screen, the grphics card and the parameters of the input device could not be detected properly. You must configure these yourself. »

  And then runs in the user interface of characher does not detect the usb, so I can't install the drivers.

  I tried to install ubuntu 12.04 also.

  I tried to install it in legacy mode.

  I tried using the OEM manufacturer.

  In any case the same thing happens.

  Help, please.

  I want to use my computer.

  MKM-ubuntu-req wrote:

  HP Pavilion 15 PC laptop 15-n004TX. It came with ubuntu. 1 GB Radeon grphics card.

  I reinstalled ubuntu 14.04 completely formatted drive. After installation, on reboot, it gives the error:

  "The system is running in low graphics mode.

  Your screen, the grphics card and the parameters of the input device could not be detected properly. You must configure these yourself. »

  And then runs in the user interface of characher does not detect the usb, so I can't install the drivers.

  I tried to install ubuntu 12.04 also.

  I tried to install it in legacy mode.

  I tried using the OEM manufacturer.

  In any case the same thing happens.

  Help, please.

  I want to use my computer.

  Hello

  Install Intel first, then ATI drivers...

  http://www.omgubuntu.co.UK/2013/04/Intel-release-graphical-installer-for-their-Linux-drivers

  http://www.securethelock.com/2014/04/20/installing-configuring-amdati-drivers-Ubuntu-14-04-trusty-tahr/

  BTW: as a linux user, I highly recommend to create a backup, the recovery discs before you do something like that.

• Run parse %

  Hi all
  
  while I'm checking AWR report I'm Execute % Analysis:-0.79
  
  When I check the cursor_sharing parameter set to EXACT
  
  
  In my opinion will I turn it on to force it or not

  Vikas Kohli wrote:
  Load profile

  Per second per Transaction
  Size: 175,185.67 252,714.86
  Logical reads: 17,255.59 11 961,83
  Block changes: 183,62 264.89
  Physical reads: 333,09 480.50
  Physical writings: 18,18 26.22
  The user calls: 4.53 6.54
  Analysis: 21,03 30,34
  Hard analysis: 0.01 0.01
  Kinds: 0.95 0.66
  Logons: 0.11 0.07
  Runs: 20,87 30.10
  Operations: 0.69

  Blocks modified by read %: 1.54% recursive call: 92,84
  Rollback transaction %: 2,30 rows by genre: #.

  I think that you have shared it for 1 HR time. Looking at this analysis is not a problem. So more than half of your problem is solved here. Then you can check how the soft analysis.

  Have you looked at thead: run to analyze the ratio is 49 no problem ?

  Also, please check whats the % CPU Non-Parse ration? If his high, nearly 90 then the analysis is not a problem for you. Hope this helps

• Code that runs on a lower version of the OS

  Hello guys,.

  First of all: Happy New Year!

  I have a question for you: it is possible to have in a two different implementations of the application of a substance, one of them using the 4.5 API and the other using the API 5.0 and based on the version of the OS (found "DeviceInfo.getSoftwareVersion ()" "") to call one of the track when running, BUT this app to exist and run on a device 4.5?

  Thank you in advance,

  Tibi.

  No sorry.

  The existence of classes included in the code is verified at the time of loading, not run time, if the loader expects classes to be there, even if you never use them.

• Run parse % in AWR

  Hi all
  
  I would Execute Parse %:-18.02 in my AWR report (with less)
  
  Is this a bad thing and why she is less than 0?
  
  Thank you
  
  John

  Refer to this link, it will help you

  http://forums.Oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=908927&TSTART=-1

• Satellite Pro L series: fan always running even at IDLE when LAN is on

  the fan always running even at IDLE when lan is on
  Thanks for any help, that can stop the fan...

  Just see your questions:
  What model of laptop do you have exactly?
  What system do you use?
  What exactly do you mean by power of LAN?

  I can tell you that the cooling modules are controlled by fan table stored in the BIOS.
  Usually, the fan starts to spin if the CPU would be responsible for some unique applications/processes. It would also be possible that your fan is running continuously with low performance to maintain the low temperature. This isn't a real problem for laptop.

• Satellite P100 GPU fan turns costantly at low speed?

  Finally something strange happened on my laptop and I wonder if even happened to other users of P100 series laptop. All of the sudden GPU fan began to operate at low speed all the time. Before he reached 60 ° C and then had shrapnel short until it cooled down to 50 ° C and the order. But now it runs at very low speeds and temperatures are around 48 C. It is not noticeable and I'm very happy with what (it should be like that from the start).

  Now I wonder what could have triggered that. Do you have bios that has changed (I have the latest 2.40). At the beginning when I changed the computer bios worked as before, but then at some point I changed muffler in performance mode and since that day, the GPU fan runs constantly. I tried to change it to silent mode, but the GPU fan runs all the time. My laptop is P100-115 (Geforce 7600)

  Hello

  Looks like you re a happy with the use of the fan.
  I think that the new BIOS has been changed and that's why he has better influence on the performance of cooling module and so it works at very low speed. I think it is much better than the rotation of the fan restless.

  As you have already mentioned the Toshiba power saver controls the speed of the CPU and cooling method. If these settings could affect the cooling of laptop.
  But believe me; It of much better to have the constant low temperature and fans completely.

• Satellite P100-324: the Fans are still running

  Hi to you all,.

  Maybe you can answer me the question.
  Is it normal that my laptop fans are still running. I put the 'silent' settings in the bios and forced the laptop to run always on 1000 MHz, if I only use it for writing
  in Word or reading emails.

  It's really annoying. I don't know what to do.

  Thankz for your help in advance

  Michael

  Hello Michael

  It is nothing unusual that cooling fan runs constantly on low speed. On modern laptops, there is a powerful hardware that needs to be cooled correctly. Especially many different processes are active in the background and CPU is standing under pressure. Not much when you use just the laptop for writing, but obviously enough to increase the temperature of the CPU.

  Try it please set the CPU and cooling to a minimum level method. Also check the Task Manager and end the process, you don't need. Maybe this will help!

• Microsoft 'Fix it' will not download/run/save

  Hello

  Microsoft 'Fix it' will not download, Vista SP1 32, running with the Defender, basics of security, AVG 9. and Win firewall. I added the site as exceptions on IE etc, but I can't get the .exe to others... BECAUSE IT WON'T SAVE TO THE OFFICE OR TO RUN!

  Help please

  Hello

  You shouldn't run MSE with a complete other antivirus. And Defender is disabled by MSE as it does
  the same function for spyware and antivirus adds.

  What Fix - it you try to run? What is the problem?

  AVG is probably the primary cause. I would uninstall it by using the removal tool or Special Instructions
  from their site - AVG 9 is causing many questions. Usually best to disable as much as possible before
  the abduction. Also download but do not install the replacements until after the deletion is completed
  and a reboot. Use the method below to all in the right order.

  Download - SAVE - go to where you put it-click on - RUN AS ADMIN

  AVG removal tool
  http://www.Avg.com/us-en/download-tools

  -------------------------------------------------

  Here's what I use and recommend:

  Avast and Prevx proved extremely reliable and compatible with everything I threw at them.
  Microsoft Security Essentials and Prevx have also proven very reliable and compatible.

  Avast Home free - stop any shields is not necessary except away from Standard, Web and network is working.

  Prevx - Home - free

  Windows Firewall

  Windows Defender (is not necessary if you use MSE)

  Protected IE - mode

  IE 8 - SmartScreen filter WE (IE 7 phishing filter)

  I also IE always start with asset if filter InPrivate IE 8.
  (Sometimes you have to temporarily turn off with the little icon to the left of the + bottom right of IE)

  Avast - stop home - free - all shields you do no need except leave Standard, Web and network running.
  (Double-click the blue icon - details look OK. - upper left Shields - those that you do not cancel).
  http://www.avast.com/eng/avast_4_home.html

  Or use Microsoft Security Essentials - free
  http://www.Microsoft.com/Security_Essentials/

  Prevx works well alongside MSE or Avast

  Prevx - Home - small, fast, exceptional CLOUD free protection, working with other security programs. It comes
  a scan only, VERY EFFICIENT, if it finds something to come back here or use Google to see how to remove.
  http://www.prevx.com/   <-->
  http://info.prevx.com/downloadcsi.asp  <-->

  PCmag - Prevx - Editor's choice
  http://www.PCMag.com/Article2/0, 2817,2346862,00.asp

  Also get Malwarebytes - free - use as scanner only. If you ever suspect malware, and that would be unusual with
  Avast and Prevx running except a low occasional (not much), updated cookie and then run it as
  a scanner. I have a lot of scanners and they never find anything of note that I started to use this configuration.

  http://www.Malwarebytes.org/

  ================================

  Your router may need a firmware update, but that would probably not produce
  bluescreens. And the rest can be processed after that AVG is out of the picture.

  I hope this helps.

  Rob - bicycle - Mark Twain said it is good.

• Windows Defender is essential if I am running other antivirus?

  As I said in a previous question, Windows Defender has been accidentally deleted from my Vista computer. I received a response, and it seems like it might be quite difficult to reinstall so my question is now; I'm on "Windows Live OneCare" so it is essential to have Windows Defender on my computer?

  Hello

  What version of Windows? And you must realize that Windows LiveOne Care is currently abandoned.
  Windows Defender can be re-load it depends just on which Windows you have.

  LiveOne - discontinued
  http://OneCare.live.com/standard/en-us/default.htm

  For Vista follow these steps:

  Start - type in the search box - find command top - RIGHT CLICK – RUN AS ADMIN

  sfc/scannow

  How to analyze the log file entries that the Microsoft Windows Resource Checker (SFC.exe) program
  generates in Windows Vista cbs.log
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/928228

  =================================

  Here's what I use and recommend: (these are all free and works very well)

  Avast and Prevx proved extremely reliable and compatible with everything I threw at them.
  Microsoft Security Essentials and Prevx have also proven very reliable and compatible.

  Avast Home free - stop any shields is not necessary except away from Standard, Web and network is working.

  Prevx - Home - free

  Windows Firewall

  Windows Defender (is not necessary if you use MSE)

  Protected IE - mode

  IE 8 - SmartScreen filter WE (IE 7 phishing filter)

  I also IE always start with asset if filter InPrivate IE 8.
  (Sometimes you have to temporarily turn off with the little icon to the left of the + bottom right of IE)

  Avast - stop home - free - all shields you do no need except leave Standard, Web and network running.
  (Double-click the blue icon - details look OK. - upper left Shields - those that you do not cancel).
  http://www.avast.com/eng/avast_4_home.html

  Or use Microsoft Security Essentials - free
  http://www.Microsoft.com/Security_Essentials/

  Prevx works well alongside MSE or Avast

  Prevx - Home - small, fast, exceptional CLOUD free protection, working with other security programs. It comes
  a scan only, VERY EFFICIENT, if it finds something to come back here or use Google to see how to remove.
  http://www.prevx.com/   <-->
  http://info.prevx.com/downloadcsi.asp  <-->

  PCmag - Prevx - Editor's choice
  http://www.PCMag.com/Article2/0, 2817,2346862,00.asp

  Also get Malwarebytes - free - use as scanner only. If you ever suspect malware, and that would be unusual with
  Avast and Prevx running except a low occasional (not much), updated cookie and then run it as
  a scanner. I have a lot of scanners and they never find anything of note that I started to use this configuration.

  http://www.Malwarebytes.org/

  I hope this helps.

  Rob - bicycle - Mark Twain said it is good.

• Should I be concerned about javaws.exe 1000 names of the running Image?

  Do you not think that this issue can cause some hidden problems or degradation of system term longer than I know not?

  It is strange that this issue has actually benefited from operation of my machine:

  About 5 minutes after each start, restart or Log-off/log-on, jsched.exe * 32 will start javaws.exe, up to 15 000 names of Image construction in the Task Manager process tab... Physical memory will approach 100% before displays a window of error message or a warning sound is heard. Then additional Image names and high physical memory percentages begin to decline... It takes a total of 4 to 5 minutes to complete...

  Subsequently, the Task Manager shows my 'normal' processes and 'normal' number the CPU usage , BUT it shows a percentage of 30% LESS of physical memory than before... AND CPU core temperatures run about 10% lower.

  I've been running my machine this way for the last two weeks, 10 to 12 hours a day... I have noticed no ill effects - I can still run several programs, browsers etc with the added benefit of not having to deal with the closing and reopening of one of my 64-bit programs to "slow down" after a few hours...

  I can prevent the foregoing by clicking jsched.exe and complete the selection process or by unchecking the box for Java Platform SE Auto Updater tab System Configuration startup...

  I am also reluctant to take the Java update that is available, because it could "solve" the problem of multiple javaws.exe... the few minutes it takes to do it's thing doesn't bother me as long as my machine continues to work very well...

  This link goes to a page on one of my blogs where I document the matter further... Weird Windows stuff .

  The picture shows the the Task Manager, before, during and after javaws.exe did her thing:

  

  System Specs:

  July 2012 BUILD CONFIGURATION
  CPU......................... Intel Core i5 3570 K Ivy Bridge 3.4 GHz LGA
  Motherboard... ASUS P8Z77 - V LK LGA Intel SATA 6 Gbps z88
  SSD drive... OCZ Vertex 128G 2.5 "SATA III
  Memory... GSKILL Sniper 8 GB (2 x 4 GB) DDR3 SDRAM 1600
  Power supply... CORSAIR/TX650 V2 (650W)
  GPU......................... 2 EVGA GeForce GT 520 1024 MB dual DVI out
  Add adapters ' l... 4 video display adapters USB Sabrient-1612
  Operating system... Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 64-bit
  Case... HEC steel ATX mid tower 2 x 120mm fans

  Components of the trade previous stations set ups
   UPS... out three 4 power supplies APC * continuously
  Monitors... AOC 24 "LED and 3 AOC 22" LED 3
  1 SOYO 20 "LCD and 1 HP 20" LCD

  Screen resolutions are put at 1920 x 1080
  (HP older SOYO LCD displays have lower ceilings...
  The SOYO is set to 1680 x 1050 and HP is set to 1600 x 90

  I saw this on multiple computers to my clients.  The solution that I've found that works is to uninstall java.  You must be willing to do quickly because at Windows startup.  The problem takes 30 seconds or more to go.  It may take several attempts to do so fairly quickly.

• How to set a user to a lower priority requests

  Am I right in thinking that the only way to take a single user and say "set the requests made by this user at a lower priority than everyone" is to implement the resource manager?
  
  A client is implementing a new reporting system and want the user account to run at a lower priority so it isn't impacting operational work of the database. I think RM is the only way to do this, but if there is a simpler way which does not imply the setting up of RM, I would be interested to hear.
  
  Thank you!

  RM seems to be the best option to achieve this. We have been using RM in our production database and have not experienced something weird so far.

  What is the average usage of the CPU in your server?

  Point (s) to know about RM:

  If your server is inactive, no process/user/schema is prioritized. All users will appreciate its full share. RM will give the blow only when your CPU usage is high and this seems logical. You would be the priority connections/queries only when you run short on the resource. This means that when your machine already has shortage of CPU, RM catch a piece to prioritize other users.

  Asif Momen
  http://momendba.blogspot.com

• Need help for analysis "plan and background events waiting" on the report statspack for oracle database 11.2.0.4 on AIX

  HI: I analyze the STATSPACK report: this is the "volume test" on our UAT server for most of entry or "bind variables".  Our shared pool is well used in oracle.  Recovery of Oracle logs is not configured properly on this server, as in "Top 5 events of waiting", there are 2 for Oder.

  I need to know what other information may be digging from of 'waiting in the foreground events' & ' background waiting events ", and which can help us better understand, in combination of ' Top 5 wait event, that how did the server test /?  It could be overwhelming. wait events, so appreciate useful diagnostic or analyses.  Database is oracle 11.2.0.4 updated from 11.2.0.3 on IBM AIX 64-bit, level 6.x system power

  
  

  STATSPACK report

  
  DB Id Instance Inst Num Startup Time Release RAC database

  
  

  ~~~~~~~~ ----------- ------------ -------- --------------- ----------- ---

  700000XXX XXX 1 22 April 15 12:12 11.2.0.4.0 no.

  
  Host name Platform CPU Cores Sockets (G) memory

  ~~~~ ---------------- ---------------------- ----- ----- ------- ------------

  dXXXX_XXX AIX-Based Systems (64-2 1 0 16.0)

  
  Snapshot Id Snap Snap time Sessions Curs/Sess comment

  ~~~~~~~~    ---------- ------------------ -------- --------- ------------------

  BEGIN Snap: 5635 22 April 15 13:00:02 114 4.6

  End Snap: 5636 22 April 15 14:00:01 128 8.8

  Elapsed time: 59.98 (mins) Av law Sess: 0.6

  DB time: 35,98 (mins) DB CPU: 19,43 (mins)

  
  Cache sizes Begin End

  ~~~~~~~~~~~       ---------- ----------

  Cache buffer: block 2 064 M Std size: 8 K

  Shared pool: 3 072 M Log Buffer: 13 632 K

  Load profile per second per Transaction per Exec by call

  ~~~~~~~~~~~~      ------------------  ----------------- ----------- -----------

  DB Time (s): 0.0 0.6 0.00 0.00

  DB CPU: 0.0 0.3 0.00 0.00

  Size: 458 720,6 8,755.7

  Logical reads: 245,7 12 874,2

  Block changes: 1 356.4 25.9

  Physical reads: 6.6 0.1

  Physical writings: 61.8 1.2

  The user calls: 38.8 2 033,7

  Analysis: 286,5 5.5

  Hard analysis: 0.5 0.0

  Treated W/A Mo: 1.7 0.0

  Logons: 1.2 0.0

  Runs: 801,1 15.3

  Cancellations: 6.1 0.1

  Operations: 52.4

  
  Indicators of the instance

  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  Buffer % Nowait: 100.00 do NoWait %: 100.00

  Buffer % success: 99.98% W/A optimal, Exec: 100.00

  Library success %: 99,77% soft Parse: 99.82

  Run parse %: 64.24 latch hit %: 99.98

  Analyze the CPU to analyze Elapsd %: 53.15% Non-Parse CPU: 98.03

  
  Shared pool statistics Begin End

  ------  ------

  % Memory use: 10.50 12.79

  % SQL with executions > 1: 69,98 78,37

  % Memory for SQL w/exec > 1: 70.22 81,96

  Top 5 timed events Avg % Total

  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                                                   wait   Call

  Event waits time (s) (ms) time

  ----------------------------------------- ------------ ----------- ------ ------

  CPU time                                                       847          50.2

  ENQ: TX - 4 480 97 434 25.8 line lock conflict

  Log file sync 284 169 185 1 11.0

  log file parallel write 299 537 164 1 9.7

  log file sequential read 698 16 24 1.0

  Host CPU (processors: 2 hearts: Sockets 1: 0)

  ~ ~ ~ Medium load

  Begin End User System Idle WIO WCPU

  ------- -------   ------- ------- ------- ------- --------

  1.16 1.84 19.28 14.51 66.21 1.20 82.01

  
  Instance of CPU

  ~~~~~~~~~~~~                                       % Time (seconds)

  -------- --------------

  Host: Time (s) Total: 7,193.8

  Host: Availability of time processor (s): 2,430.7

  % of time host is busy: 33.8

  Instance: Time processor Total (s): 1,203.1

  % Busy CPU used, for example: 49.5

  Instance: Time of database total (s): 2,426.4

  % DB time waiting for CPU (resp. resources): 0.0

  
  Statistical memory Begin End

  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                ------------ ------------

  Host Mem (MB): 16,384.0 16 384,0

  Use of LMS (MB): 7,136.0 7 136,0

  Use of PGA (Mo): 282.5 361.4

  Host % Mem used for SGA + PGA: 45.3 45.8

  Foreground wait events DB/Inst: XXXXXs Snaps: 5635-5636

  -> Only events with wait times Total (s) > =.001 are indicated

  --> sorted by Total desc waiting time, waits desc (idle last events)

  
  AVG % Total

  % Tim Total wait Wait Wait call

  Event is waiting for the time (s) (ms) /txn times

  ---------------------------- ------------ ---- ---------- ------ -------- ------

  ENQ: TX - line lock 4 480 0 434 97 contentio 0,0 25.8

  284 167 0 185 1 file synchronization log 1.5 11.0

  File I/O 8 741 of disk 0 4 operations 0.0 0.2

  direct path write 0 13 247 3 0.1 0.2

  DB file sequential read 6 058 0 1 0.0 0.1

  buffer busy waits 1 800 0 1 1 0,0.1

  SQL * Net more data to the client 29 161 0 1 0.2 0.1

  direct path read 7 696 0 1 0.0 0.0

  db file scattered read 316 0 1 2 0,0.0

  latch: shared pool 144 0 0 2 0,0.0

  Initialization of 30 0 0 3 0,0.0 CSS

  cursor: hand 10 0 0 9 0,0.0 S

  lock row cache 41 0 0 2 0,0.0

  latch: rank objects cache 19 0 0 3 0,0.0

  log file switch (private 8 0 0 7 0,0.0 str

  library cache: mutex X 28 0 0 2 0,0.0

  latch: cache buffers chains 54 0 0 1 0,0.0

  free lock 290 0 0 0.0 0.0

  sequential control file read 1 568 0 0 0.0 0.0

  switch logfile (4 0 0 6 0,0.0 control point

  Live sync 8 0 0 3 0,0.0 road

  latch: redo allocation 60 0 0 0 0.0.0

  SQL * Net break/reset for 34 0 0 1 0,0.0 customer

  latch: enqueue hash chains 45 0 0 0 0.0.0

  latch: cache buffers lru chain 7 0 0 2 0,0.0

  latch: allowance 5 0 0 1 0,0.0 session

  latch: object queue header 6 0 0 1 0,0.0 o

  Operation of metadata files ASM 30 0 0 0 0.0.0

  latch: in memory of undo latch 15 0 0 0.0 0.0

  latch: cancel the overall data 8 0 0 0 0.0.0

  SQL * Net client message 6 362 536 0 278 225 44 33.7

  jobq slave wait 7 270 100 3 635 500 0.0

  SQL * Net more data to 7 976 0 15 2 0,0 clien

  SQL * Net message to client 6 362 544 0 8 0 33.7

  -------------------------------------------------------------

  Context of the DB/Inst events waiting: XXXXXs clings: 5635-5636

  -> Only events with wait times Total (s) > =.001 are indicated

  --> sorted by Total desc waiting time, waits desc (idle last events)

  AVG % Total

  % Tim Total wait Wait Wait call

  Event is waiting for the time (s) (ms) /txn times

  ---------------------------- ------------ ---- ---------- ------ -------- ------

  log file parallel write 299 537 0 164 1 1.6 9.7

  log file sequential read 698 0 16 24 0.0 1.0

  db file parallel write 9 556 0 13 1 0,1.8

  146 0 10 70 0,0.6 startup operating system thread

  control file parallel write 2 037 0 2 1 0,0.1

  Newspaper archive e/s 35 0 1 30 0,0.1

  LGWR wait for redo copy 2 447 0 0 0.0 0.0

  async file IO DB present 9 556 0 0 0.1 0.0

  DB file sequential read 145 0 0 2 0,0.0

  File I/O disk 349 0 operations 0 0.0 0.0

  db file scattered read 30 0 0 4 0,0.0

  sequential control file read 5 837 0 0 0.0 0.0

  ADR block lu file 19 0 0 4 0,0.0

  Block ADR file write 5 0 0 15 0,0.0

  direct path write 14 0 0 2 0,0.0

  direct path read 3 0 0 7 0,0.0

  latch: shared pool 3 0 0 6 0,0.0

  single log file write 56 0 0 0.0 0.0

  latch: redo allocation 53 0 0 0 0.0.0

  latch: 1 0 0 3 0,0.0 active service list

  free latch 11 0 0 0 0.0.0

  CPI of RDBMS 5 314 523 57 189 182 1.7 message

  Space Manager: slave wa slowed 4 086 88 18 996 4649 0.0

  DIAG idle wait 7 185 100 1000 7 186 0.0

  Streams AQ: waiting time 2 50 4 909 # 0,0

  Streams AQ: qmn slowed slave 129 0 3 612 28002 0.0 w

  Streams AQ: Coordinator of the 258 50 3 612 14001 0,0 qmn

  SMON timer 2 43 3 605 83839 0.0

  PMON timer 99 1 199 2999 3 596 0.0

  SQL * Net client message 17 019 0 31 2 0.1

  SQL * Net message to client 12 762 0 0 0.1 0

  class slaves wait 28 0 0 0 0.0

  Thank you very much!

  Hello

  I think that your CPU is overloaded by your stress tests. You have one VCPU with 2 wires (2 LCPU), right? And the load average is greater than one. You have time DB which is not counted in (CPU time + wait events) and which comes no doubt from time spent in the runqueue.

  > Oracle recovery logs is not properly configured on this server, as in "Top 5 events of waiting", there are 2 for oder

  It is an error in statspack for show "log file parallel write here." This moment is historical and is included in 'log file sync '. And I don't think you have to redo misconfiguration. Waiting for 1ms to commit is ok. In OLTP you should have more than one validation in a user interaction so that the user don't worry not about 1 m in batch mode, unless you commit to each row, 1 DC to commit should not increase the total execution time.

  The fact that you have a lot of line lock (enq: TX - line lock conflict) but very little time (on average 97 ms) is probably a sign that testers are running simultaneously a charge affecting the same data. Their set of test data is perhaps too simple and short. An example: when stress tests of an order entry system if you run 1000 concurrent sessions, ordering the same product to the same customer, you can get this kind of symptoms, but the test we unrealistic.

  It's a high activity of 2000 calls per second, 52 transactions per second, user. But you also have low average active sessions, so the report probably covers a period of non-uniform activity, which makes the averages without meaning.

  So note to tell about the events of waiting here. But we don't have any info about 39% of DB time devoted to the CPU which is where something can be improved.

  Kind regards

  Franck.