Run parse %
Hi allwhile I'm checking AWR report I'm Execute % Analysis:-0.79
When I check the cursor_sharing parameter set to EXACT
In my opinion will I turn it on to force it or not
Vikas Kohli wrote:
Load profilePer second per Transaction
Size: 175,185.67 252,714.86
Logical reads: 17,255.59 11 961,83
Block changes: 183,62 264.89
Physical reads: 333,09 480.50
Physical writings: 18,18 26.22
The user calls: 4.53 6.54
Analysis: 21,03 30,34
Hard analysis: 0.01 0.01
Kinds: 0.95 0.66
Logons: 0.11 0.07
Runs: 20,87 30.10
Operations: 0.69Blocks modified by read %: 1.54% recursive call: 92,84
Rollback transaction %: 2,30 rows by genre: #.
I think that you have shared it for 1 HR time. Looking at this analysis is not a problem. So more than half of your problem is solved here. Then you can check how the soft analysis.
Have you looked at thead: run to analyze the ratio is 49 no problem ?
Also, please check whats the % CPU Non-Parse ration? If his high, nearly 90 then the analysis is not a problem for you. Hope this helps
Tags: Database
Similar Questions
-
Hi, I was doing the research on this stat in AWR. It is said that many times he analyzes is around the same as the number of times it runs.
My question is, how do we identify what SQLs cause this low ratio? I had around 5%. (100% is ideal)
In time past dessu. There is only 1 problem sql showing upwards.
Time elapsed (s) Executions Time by Exec (s) % Total % CPU %IO SQL ID SQL module SQL text 3,486.33 54 867 0.06 86.76 29,86 68,87 xxxxxxx1 JDBC Thin Client Select / * + FIRST_ROWS * / CI... Since that has 50 k runs, I don't think not that this is the SQL causing bass run to analyze the report.
Thank you
SQL > select count (*) from v$ sql where executions = 1;
COUNT (*)
----------
281
SQL > select count (*) from v$ sql;
COUNT (*)
----------
1386
-
Hi all
I would Execute Parse %:-18.02 in my AWR report (with less)
Is this a bad thing and why she is less than 0?
Thank you
JohnRefer to this link, it will help you
http://forums.Oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=908927&TSTART=-1
-
HI: I analyze the STATSPACK report: this is the "volume test" on our UAT server for most of entry or "bind variables". Our shared pool is well used in oracle. Recovery of Oracle logs is not configured properly on this server, as in "Top 5 events of waiting", there are 2 for Oder.
I need to know what other information may be digging from of 'waiting in the foreground events' & ' background waiting events ", and which can help us better understand, in combination of ' Top 5 wait event, that how did the server test /? It could be overwhelming. wait events, so appreciate useful diagnostic or analyses. Database is oracle 11.2.0.4 updated from 11.2.0.3 on IBM AIX 64-bit, level 6.x system power
STATSPACK report
DB Id Instance Inst Num Startup Time Release RAC database~~~~~~~~ ----------- ------------ -------- --------------- ----------- ---
700000XXX XXX 1 22 April 15 12:12 11.2.0.4.0 no.
Host name Platform CPU Cores Sockets (G) memory~~~~ ---------------- ---------------------- ----- ----- ------- ------------
dXXXX_XXX AIX-Based Systems (64-2 1 0 16.0)
Snapshot Id Snap Snap time Sessions Curs/Sess comment~~~~~~~~ ---------- ------------------ -------- --------- ------------------
BEGIN Snap: 5635 22 April 15 13:00:02 114 4.6
End Snap: 5636 22 April 15 14:00:01 128 8.8
Elapsed time: 59.98 (mins) Av law Sess: 0.6
DB time: 35,98 (mins) DB CPU: 19,43 (mins)
Cache sizes Begin End~~~~~~~~~~~ ---------- ----------
Cache buffer: block 2 064 M Std size: 8 K
Shared pool: 3 072 M Log Buffer: 13 632 K
Load profile per second per Transaction per Exec by call
~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------------ ----------------- ----------- -----------
DB Time (s): 0.0 0.6 0.00 0.00
DB CPU: 0.0 0.3 0.00 0.00
Size: 458 720,6 8,755.7
Logical reads: 245,7 12 874,2
Block changes: 1 356.4 25.9
Physical reads: 6.6 0.1
Physical writings: 61.8 1.2
The user calls: 38.8 2 033,7
Analysis: 286,5 5.5
Hard analysis: 0.5 0.0
Treated W/A Mo: 1.7 0.0
Logons: 1.2 0.0
Runs: 801,1 15.3
Cancellations: 6.1 0.1
Operations: 52.4
Indicators of the instance~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer % Nowait: 100.00 do NoWait %: 100.00
Buffer % success: 99.98% W/A optimal, Exec: 100.00
Library success %: 99,77% soft Parse: 99.82
Run parse %: 64.24 latch hit %: 99.98
Analyze the CPU to analyze Elapsd %: 53.15% Non-Parse CPU: 98.03
Shared pool statistics Begin End------ ------
% Memory use: 10.50 12.79
% SQL with executions > 1: 69,98 78,37
% Memory for SQL w/exec > 1: 70.22 81,96
Top 5 timed events Avg % Total
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ wait Call
Event waits time (s) (ms) time
----------------------------------------- ------------ ----------- ------ ------
CPU time 847 50.2
ENQ: TX - 4 480 97 434 25.8 line lock conflict
Log file sync 284 169 185 1 11.0
log file parallel write 299 537 164 1 9.7
log file sequential read 698 16 24 1.0
Host CPU (processors: 2 hearts: Sockets 1: 0)
~ ~ ~ Medium load
Begin End User System Idle WIO WCPU
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- --------
1.16 1.84 19.28 14.51 66.21 1.20 82.01
Instance of CPU~~~~~~~~~~~~ % Time (seconds)
-------- --------------
Host: Time (s) Total: 7,193.8
Host: Availability of time processor (s): 2,430.7
% of time host is busy: 33.8
Instance: Time processor Total (s): 1,203.1
% Busy CPU used, for example: 49.5
Instance: Time of database total (s): 2,426.4
% DB time waiting for CPU (resp. resources): 0.0
Statistical memory Begin End~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ------------ ------------
Host Mem (MB): 16,384.0 16 384,0
Use of LMS (MB): 7,136.0 7 136,0
Use of PGA (Mo): 282.5 361.4
Host % Mem used for SGA + PGA: 45.3 45.8
Foreground wait events DB/Inst: XXXXXs Snaps: 5635-5636
-> Only events with wait times Total (s) > =.001 are indicated
--> sorted by Total desc waiting time, waits desc (idle last events)
AVG % Total% Tim Total wait Wait Wait call
Event is waiting for the time (s) (ms) /txn times
---------------------------- ------------ ---- ---------- ------ -------- ------
ENQ: TX - line lock 4 480 0 434 97 contentio 0,0 25.8
284 167 0 185 1 file synchronization log 1.5 11.0
File I/O 8 741 of disk 0 4 operations 0.0 0.2
direct path write 0 13 247 3 0.1 0.2
DB file sequential read 6 058 0 1 0.0 0.1
buffer busy waits 1 800 0 1 1 0,0.1
SQL * Net more data to the client 29 161 0 1 0.2 0.1
direct path read 7 696 0 1 0.0 0.0
db file scattered read 316 0 1 2 0,0.0
latch: shared pool 144 0 0 2 0,0.0
Initialization of 30 0 0 3 0,0.0 CSS
cursor: hand 10 0 0 9 0,0.0 S
lock row cache 41 0 0 2 0,0.0
latch: rank objects cache 19 0 0 3 0,0.0
log file switch (private 8 0 0 7 0,0.0 str
library cache: mutex X 28 0 0 2 0,0.0
latch: cache buffers chains 54 0 0 1 0,0.0
free lock 290 0 0 0.0 0.0
sequential control file read 1 568 0 0 0.0 0.0
switch logfile (4 0 0 6 0,0.0 control point
Live sync 8 0 0 3 0,0.0 road
latch: redo allocation 60 0 0 0 0.0.0
SQL * Net break/reset for 34 0 0 1 0,0.0 customer
latch: enqueue hash chains 45 0 0 0 0.0.0
latch: cache buffers lru chain 7 0 0 2 0,0.0
latch: allowance 5 0 0 1 0,0.0 session
latch: object queue header 6 0 0 1 0,0.0 o
Operation of metadata files ASM 30 0 0 0 0.0.0
latch: in memory of undo latch 15 0 0 0.0 0.0
latch: cancel the overall data 8 0 0 0 0.0.0
SQL * Net client message 6 362 536 0 278 225 44 33.7
jobq slave wait 7 270 100 3 635 500 0.0
SQL * Net more data to 7 976 0 15 2 0,0 clien
SQL * Net message to client 6 362 544 0 8 0 33.7
-------------------------------------------------------------
Context of the DB/Inst events waiting: XXXXXs clings: 5635-5636
-> Only events with wait times Total (s) > =.001 are indicated
--> sorted by Total desc waiting time, waits desc (idle last events)
AVG % Total
% Tim Total wait Wait Wait call
Event is waiting for the time (s) (ms) /txn times
---------------------------- ------------ ---- ---------- ------ -------- ------
log file parallel write 299 537 0 164 1 1.6 9.7
log file sequential read 698 0 16 24 0.0 1.0
db file parallel write 9 556 0 13 1 0,1.8
146 0 10 70 0,0.6 startup operating system thread
control file parallel write 2 037 0 2 1 0,0.1
Newspaper archive e/s 35 0 1 30 0,0.1
LGWR wait for redo copy 2 447 0 0 0.0 0.0
async file IO DB present 9 556 0 0 0.1 0.0
DB file sequential read 145 0 0 2 0,0.0
File I/O disk 349 0 operations 0 0.0 0.0
db file scattered read 30 0 0 4 0,0.0
sequential control file read 5 837 0 0 0.0 0.0
ADR block lu file 19 0 0 4 0,0.0
Block ADR file write 5 0 0 15 0,0.0
direct path write 14 0 0 2 0,0.0
direct path read 3 0 0 7 0,0.0
latch: shared pool 3 0 0 6 0,0.0
single log file write 56 0 0 0.0 0.0
latch: redo allocation 53 0 0 0 0.0.0
latch: 1 0 0 3 0,0.0 active service list
free latch 11 0 0 0 0.0.0
CPI of RDBMS 5 314 523 57 189 182 1.7 message
Space Manager: slave wa slowed 4 086 88 18 996 4649 0.0
DIAG idle wait 7 185 100 1000 7 186 0.0
Streams AQ: waiting time 2 50 4 909 # 0,0
Streams AQ: qmn slowed slave 129 0 3 612 28002 0.0 w
Streams AQ: Coordinator of the 258 50 3 612 14001 0,0 qmn
SMON timer 2 43 3 605 83839 0.0
PMON timer 99 1 199 2999 3 596 0.0
SQL * Net client message 17 019 0 31 2 0.1
SQL * Net message to client 12 762 0 0 0.1 0
class slaves wait 28 0 0 0 0.0
Thank you very much!
Hello
I think that your CPU is overloaded by your stress tests. You have one VCPU with 2 wires (2 LCPU), right? And the load average is greater than one. You have time DB which is not counted in (CPU time + wait events) and which comes no doubt from time spent in the runqueue.
> Oracle recovery logs is not properly configured on this server, as in "Top 5 events of waiting", there are 2 for oder
It is an error in statspack for show "log file parallel write here." This moment is historical and is included in 'log file sync '. And I don't think you have to redo misconfiguration. Waiting for 1ms to commit is ok. In OLTP you should have more than one validation in a user interaction so that the user don't worry not about 1 m in batch mode, unless you commit to each row, 1 DC to commit should not increase the total execution time.
The fact that you have a lot of line lock (enq: TX - line lock conflict) but very little time (on average 97 ms) is probably a sign that testers are running simultaneously a charge affecting the same data. Their set of test data is perhaps too simple and short. An example: when stress tests of an order entry system if you run 1000 concurrent sessions, ordering the same product to the same customer, you can get this kind of symptoms, but the test we unrealistic.
It's a high activity of 2000 calls per second, 52 transactions per second, user. But you also have low average active sessions, so the report probably covers a period of non-uniform activity, which makes the averages without meaning.
So note to tell about the events of waiting here. But we don't have any info about 39% of DB time devoted to the CPU which is where something can be improved.
Kind regards
Franck.
-
Pls help me interpret the AWR report based on the following statistical data.
Load profile
Per second per Transaction per Exec per call
DB Time (s): 1.3 0.3 0.01 0.02
DB CPU: the 0.3 0.1 0.00 0.00
Size: 27 170.7 6,227.3
Logical reads: 44 554,6 10,211.5
Block changes: 183.4 42.0
Physical reads: 18 370.4 4,210.3
Physical writings: 32.2 7.4
The user calls: 81.6 18.7
Analysis: 24.0 5.5
Hard analysis: 0.3 0.1
Treated W/A Mo: 0.1 0.5
Logons: 0.2 0.0
Runs: 254,2 58.3
Cancellations: 2.8 0.6
Operations: 4.4
Instance efficiency percentage (target 100%)
% Buffer Nowait: 94,43 redo NoWait %: 100.00
Buffer % success: 58,80% sort in memory: 100.00
Library success %: 99,71% soft Parse: 98,76
Run parse %: latch 90,57 hit %: 99.99
Analyze the CPU to analyze Elapsd %: 62,99% Non-Parse CPU: 98.48
% Use of memory: 86,62 85,62
% SQL with executions > 1: 95,71 93.01
% Memory for SQL w/exec > 1: 96,59 91,51
Top 5 timed events in foreground
Event waits Time (s) waiting (ms) % DB class average response time wait
read by another session 613,959,299 1 444 853 68.96 user I/O
DB CPU 141 192 21,89
DB file sequential read 48 912 1 63,918,992 7.58 user IO
db file scattered read 7 994 566 4 634 1 0.72 user IO
gc 30,678,150 4 396 cr disc 0 0.68 Cluster
Host CPU (processors: 8 cores: 8 Sockets: 2)
Average load Begin load average end user % WIO %System% Idle
0.32 0.24 14.0 5.3 1.4 80.6
Instance of CPU
% Total % CPU busy % DB time CPU waiting for CPU (Resource Manager)
10.6 0.0 54.8
Memory statistics
Begin End
Host Mem (MB): 32,764.4 32 764,4
Use of LMS (MB): 8,192.0 8 192,0
Use of PGA (MB): 966,5 1,105.5
Host % Mem used for SGA + PGA: 27,95 28.38
Number of Instances: 2 2
Global load profile Cache
Per second per Transaction
Received global Cache blocks: 4.18 0.96
Served global Cache blocks: 18.64 4.27
GCS/GHG messages received: 629,86 144.36
GCS/GHG messages sent: 505,70 115,90
Merger of DBWR writing: 0.45 0.10
Estd (KB) 404.32 interswitching traffic
Global Cache efficiency percentages (lens + local remote 100%)
Access - local cache buffer %: 58,79
Access - remote cache buffer %: 0.01
Access - disk buffer %: 41.20
Global Cache and Enqueue Services - characteristics of the workload
Time model statistics
Time in the user-calls database (DB time) Total: s 645084.3
Statistics, including the word 'context' measure the background processing time and therefore do not contribute to the time of the DB
statistical
Ordered as a percentage or DB time desc, name of statistic
Statistics time (s) % of time of the DB name
Execute SQL time elapsed 635,898.44 98.58
DB CPU 141,192.37 21,89
PL/SQL execution elapsed 11.05 71 255,32
Time cpu RMAN (backup/restore) 3.25 20 973,68
analysis time 8,241.32 1.28
time analysis hard 6,569.44 1.02
entrants PL/SQL rpc time elapsed 5 472,33 0.85
elapsed time failed analysis 0.59 3 800,08
time up hard analysis (sharing criteria) 436,30 0.07
elapsed time of connection management call 276,28 0.04
PL/SQL compilation elapsed 135,32 0.02
Java execution elapsed 128,78 0.02
elapsed time sequence load 75,10 0.01
time bind repeated 24,70 0.00
time up hard analysis (bind incompatibility) 11,86 0.00
Time of DB 645,084.25
elapsed time of background 554,250.33
time background cpu 280,430.82
Kind regards
VNuser7202581 wrote:
Pls help me interpret the AWR report based on the following statistical data.I tried to format your AWR report. Please in the future do not publish versions in HTML of AWR reports and use a tag code before and after the content of your report to preserve spaces:
Load Profile Per Second Per Transaction Per Exec Per Call DB Time(s): 1.3 0.3 0.01 0.02 DB CPU(s): 0.3 0.1 0.00 0.00 Redo size: 27,170.7 6,227.3 Logical reads: 44,554.6 10,211.5 Block changes: 183.4 42.0 Physical reads: 18,370.4 4,210.3 Physical writes: 32.2 7.4 User calls: 81.6 18.7 Parses: 24.0 5.5 Hard parses: 0.3 0.1 W/A MB processed: 0.5 0.1 Logons: 0.2 0.0 Executes: 254.2 58.3 Rollbacks: 2.8 0.6 Transactions: 4.4 Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%) Buffer Nowait %: 94.43 Redo NoWait %: 100.00 Buffer Hit %: 58.80 In-memory Sort %: 100.00 Library Hit %: 99.71 Soft Parse %: 98.76 Execute to Parse %: 90.57 Latch Hit %: 99.99 Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %:62.99 % Non-Parse CPU: 98.48 Memory Usage %: 86.62 85.62 % SQL with executions>1: 95.71 93.01 % Memory for SQL w/exec>1: 96.59 91.51 Top 5 Timed Foreground Events Event Waits Time(s) Avg wait (ms) % DB time Wait Class read by other session 613,959,299 444,853 1 68.96 User I/O DB CPU 141,192 21.89 db file sequential read 63,918,992 48,912 1 7.58 User I/O db file scattered read 7,994,566 4,634 1 0.72 User I/O gc cr disk read 30,678,150 4,396 0 0.68 Cluster Host CPU (CPUs: 8 Cores: 8 Sockets: 2) Load Average Begin Load Average End %User %System %WIO %Idle 0.24 0.32 14.0 5.3 1.4 80.6 Instance CPU %Total CPU %Busy CPU %DB time waiting for CPU (Resource Manager) 10.6 54.8 0.0 Memory Statistics Begin End Host Mem (MB): 32,764.4 32,764.4 SGA use (MB): 8,192.0 8,192.0 PGA use (MB): 966.5 1,105.5 % Host Mem used for SGA+PGA: 27.95 28.38 Number of Instances: 2 2 Global Cache Load Profile Per Second Per Transaction Global Cache blocks received: 4.18 0.96 Global Cache blocks served: 18.64 4.27 GCS/GES messages received: 629.86 144.36 GCS/GES messages sent: 505.70 115.90 DBWR Fusion writes: 0.45 0.10 Estd Interconnect traffic (KB) 404.32 Global Cache Efficiency Percentages (Target local+remote 100%) Buffer access - local cache %: 58.79 Buffer access - remote cache %: 0.01 Buffer access - disk %: 41.20 Global Cache and Enqueue Services - Workload Characteristics Time Model Statistics Total time in database user-calls (DB Time): 645084.3s Statistics including the word "background" measure background process time, and so do not contribute to the DB time statistic Ordered by % or DB time desc, Statistic name Statistic Name Time (s) % of DB Time sql execute elapsed time 635,898.44 98.58 DB CPU 141,192.37 21.89 PL/SQL execution elapsed time 71,255.32 11.05 parse time elapsed 8,241.32 1.28 hard parse elapsed time 6,569.44 1.02 inbound PL/SQL rpc elapsed time 5,472.33 0.85 failed parse elapsed time 3,800.08 0.59 hard parse (sharing criteria) elapsed time 436.30 0.07 connection management call elapsed time 276.28 0.04 PL/SQL compilation elapsed time 135.32 0.02 Java execution elapsed time 128.78 0.02 sequence load elapsed time 75.10 0.01 repeated bind elapsed time 24.70 0.00 hard parse (bind mismatch) elapsed time 11.86 0.00 DB time 645,084.25 background elapsed time 554,250.33 background cpu time 280,430.82 RMAN cpu time (backup/restore) 20,973.68 3.25After spending a lot of time fixing the formatting of the section of the AWR report posted, what follows is visible:
Time (s) DB = 1.3 seconds per second wall clock
Report total time = 645,084.25/1.3 = 496 219 seconds (approximately) = 137,84 hoursDo not generate an AWR report with 137,84 hours. Why? First of all, allows you to hide the details important but who are lost in the medium - the numbers above show that your database instance has been almost (1.3 idle sessions occupied), these medium-sized sessions 1.3 spend 78.11% of their time waiting for events. Second, the substantive elapsed time is 86% of the time consumed by user sessions - who provided misleading information unless people recognise that the report covers everyday 5.74. Ideally, your AWR report should cover the minimum time necessary for analysis (and if you want to solve a problem with a single session, it is best to use a SQL extended 10046 trace). This amount of time can be 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 1 hour, or 3 hours, but (almost) never 5.74 days.
Close look at the items suggested by Dom.
Charles Hooper
http://hoopercharles.WordPress.com/
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K & M-making Machine, Inc. -
My AWR report showing this.
Instance efficiency percentage (target 100%)
% Buffer Nowait: remake of 99.99% of NoWait: 100.00
Buffer % success: 99.96% sort in memory: 100.00
Library % success: 99.99% soft Parse: 99,62
Run parse %: latch 95.74 hit %: 96.03
Analyze the CPU to analyze Elapsd %: 89,15% Non-Parse CPU: 97,93
Please comment on it.
Kind regards
VNFrom there you can interpret your SGA is used correctly and run more happens that is soft analysis which is also a good sign.
-
HOW URL WSDL Web Service: Web Service call in the workflow
have a 1 step, Web service workflow: call the Web Service. I wish I could pass a string parameter to the url of the endpoint for the parameter of the URL of the WSDL in the Web service settings dialog box as oppose to the transmission of the actual url (http://machine/some_service.svc?wsdl).
The reason is that we are moving the workflow between environments DEV, TEST, etc., we do not want to reopen the workflow in each env and update the DEV, TEST endpoint.
I tried the following without success
1. create a parameter of type String devURL
2 by default, set the value on http://machine/some_service.svc?wsdl
3 Goto service web appeal stage and set the URL of the WSDL to the /process_data/@devURL
I get the error:
java.io.FileNotFoundException: \process_data\@devURL
at org.jboss.net.protocol.file.FileURLConnection.connect(FileURLConnection.java:94)
at org.jboss.net.protocol.file.FileURLConnection.getInputStream(FileURLConnection.java:103)
at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLEntityManager.setupCurrentEntity (unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.impl.XMLVersionDetector.determineDocVersion (unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse (unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XML11Configuration.parse (unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.parsers.XMLParser.parse (unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.parsers.DOMParser.parse (unknown Source)
at org.apache.xerces.jaxp.DocumentBuilderImpl.parse (unknown Source)
at org.apache.axis.utils.XMLUtils.newDocument(XMLUtils.java:369)
at org.apache.axis.utils.XMLUtils.newDocument(XMLUtils.java:420)
at org.apache.axis.wsdl.symbolTable.SymbolTable.populate(SymbolTable.java:482)
to org.apache.axis.wsdl.gen.Parser$ WSDLRunnable.run (Parser.java:361)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
I don't think that the URL of the WSDL parameter can even accept a parameter as the username + password settings.
Is this possible? OR if not, how can this be achieved?
Under the Service Web Options change 'The Option' use 'variable' instead of 'literal '. Then click the Green + and it will create a variable of type WebServiceSettingBean.
You can use a setValue before the stage of web service to set this variable.
Jasmine
-
Hello
Executed developer a query that creates a table of joining three tables, it took a long time to create a table then we (DBA) killed the sesison developer forms from there is huge I/O consumption. create table has been run in niologing mode, I've posted a few values of AWR report and the wait event was 'wait for a check Cancel.
Report from the WORKING REPOSITORY for
DB name DB Id Instance Inst Num release RAC host
------------ ----------- ------------ -------- ----------- --- ------------
ODSPROD 1894138111 ODSPROD 1 10.2.0.1.0 NO XXXXXX
Snap Id Snap time Sessions Curs/Sess
--------- ------------------- -------- ---------
BEGIN Snap: 20970 25 March 09 11:30:51 173 4.2
End Snap: 20974 25 March 09 15:30:10 151 3.9
Elapsed time: 239.31 (min.)
DB time: 13,431.47 (min.)
Cache sizes
~ ~ ~ Begin End
---------- ----------
Buffer cache: size 35 776 M 35 776 M Std block: 8K
Shared pool size: 2 048 M 2 048 M Log Buffer: 8 448 K
Load profile
~ ~ ~ Per second per Transaction
--------------- ---------------
Size: 1,826,558.25 1,644,434.96
Logical reads: 48,734.09 54 131,46
Block changes: 14,404.01 15 999,27
Physical reads: 9 496,99 8,550.06
Physical writings: 988.19 1 097,63
The user calls: 163,90 147.56
Analysis: 45.26 50,27
Hard analysis: 0.23 0.21
Kinds: 5.36 4.83
Logons: 0.39 0.35
Runs: 95,54 8602
Operations: 1.11
Blocks modified by read %: 29.56% recursive call: 76,67
Rollback transaction %: 5.57 rows by genre: #.
Instance efficiency percentage (target 100%)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
% Buffer Nowait: 98.77 redo NoWait %: 99.89
Buffer % success: 93,44% sort in memory: 100.00
Library success %: 99,76% soft Parse: 99.54
Run parse %: 47.38 latch hit %: 99.50
Analyze the CPU to analyze Elapsd %: 27.63% Non-Parse CPU: 99.91
Shared pool statistics Begin End
------ ------
% Use of memory: 94,69 94.46
Executions > 1% SQL: 94.00 95.82
% Memory for SQL w/exec > 1: 93,19 96,30
Top 5 timed events Avg % Total
~ ~ ~ waiting for call
Event waits time (s) (ms) time wait class
------------------------------ ------------ ----------- ------ ------ ----------
wait for recording to cancel 6 886 655 475 370 69 59.0 others
switch log file (checkpoint in 123 588 118 643 960 14.7 sh
DB file sequential read 8 980 853 67 170 7 8.3 user IO
Time CPU 6.3 50 426
direct path read 1 440 127 28 079 19 3.5 user IO
-------------------------------------------------------------
Both the statistical model DB/Inst: ODSPROD/ODSPROD Snaps: 20970-20974
-> Total time in the user-calls database (DB time): s 805888.3
-> Statistics, including the background measure word process 'melts '.
time and therefore do not contribute to the statistics of time DB
-> Ordered as a percentage or DB time desc, name of statistic
Statistics time (s) % of time of the DB name
------------------------------------------ ------------------ ------------
Execute SQL time elapsed 19.7 158 860,3
DB CPU 50,425.9 6.3
elapsed time sequence load 8,400.3 1.0
elapsed time of connection management call 6,043.1.7
analysis time elapsed 3,261.5.4
the elapsed time analysis hard 3,198.2.4
hard analysis (sharing criteria) of time 1,649.6.2
PL/SQL execution elapsed 408.7.1
could not parse time elapsed 292.2.0
PL/SQL compilation elapsed 203,5.0
hard analysis (bind incompatibility) of time 0,6.0
repeated link 0,3.0 out of time
DB time 805,888.3 N/A
context of time 68,713.0 N/A
background cpu time 6,727.7 N/A
-------------------------------------------------------------
I just want to know how we can capture this wait event Cancel any how the session is killed still waiting for cancellation is active what may be the cause.
Sorry for the presentation of the awr report.
Thank you
JafarJerome wrote:
Executed developer a query that creates a table of joining three tables, it took a long time to create a table then we (DBA) killed the sesison developer forms from there is huge I/O consumption. create table has been run in niologing mode, I've posted a few values of AWR report and the wait event was 'wait for a check Cancel.I just want to know how we can capture this wait event Cancel any how the session is killed still waiting for cancellation is active what may be the cause.
Jafar,
the event of waiting 'wait for a record Cancel' means possibly parallel rollback performed by SMON and slaves in parallel. For example see MetaLink Note 464246.1 (DUE TO PARALLEL TRANSACTION RECOVERY HANG DATABASE)
What intrigues me is that a CREATE TABLE does not cancel, and what assistance the NOLOGGING option (if not replaced by some FORCE LOGGING tablespace or database level) minimizes the REDO generation.
If a CREATE TABLE does not CANCEL since it does not apply changes to existing blocks but simply allocate new blocks which cannot be read by any other session as long as the process is not complete and if who gets killed shouldn't cause any excessive load caused by the restoration activities, but your system activity suggests otherwise. There seems to be a large transaction rollback occurring which could also explain the strong generation of REDO (back generates REDO).
It would be more logical if the killed was a such a great INSERT without mode APPEND or a vast operation to UPDATE or REMOVE.
Kind regards
RandolfOracle related blog stuff:
http://Oracle-Randolf.blogspot.com/SQLTools ++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676 /.
http://sourceforge.NET/projects/SQLT-pp/ -
I get a message that says... your version of internet explore is obsolete to run the latest XML parser. I cannot print with my printers. I have a XP SP3, 5 years old. It's time to upgrade to windows 7
What version of IE are you using?
The current version is IE8 - http://www.microsoft.com/nz/windows/internet-explorer/default.aspx
IE9 (is still in beta).
Harold Horne / TaurArian [MVP] 2005-2011. The information has been provided * being * with no guarantee or warranty.
-
running windows xp, update java 7 51, norton antivirus says file is ok, please help
HI DJDOLLARROB,
Thanks for posting, as you might expect, there are troubleshooting you can undertake to check why the download does not work. It is highly possible that the source that you have downloaded from cannot be no longer works. Is there a site that you can check to see if it does not work for them either? Also where it is downloaded from?
Otherwise please see if scanitemswhendone is enabled: change what Firefox does when you click on or download a file
If download hangs at the last minute (just before reaching 100%), the cause may be an antivirus software that tries to parse the file and during this process the instance of Firefox crashes.
To resolve the issue, try disabling the analysis as follows:
- In the address bar, type Subject: config and press enter. The subject: config "this might void your warranty!" warning page may appear.
- Click on I'll be careful, I promise!, to continue on the subject: config page. A list of parameters must appear
- Filter the list by typing in the search bar at top. Enter scanWhenDone. Now you should find the "browser.download.scanWhenDone" preference.
- Double-click this preference to set the value to false.
- Then, try to download something and see if it still crashes.
Please reply and let us know if this helped you!
-
ATTENTION: nsIJSON.decode is obsolete. Use JSON.parse instead.
ATTENTION: nsIJSON.decode is obsolete. Use JSON.parse instead. Symptom. WHN I open a new tab, the creen goes on with my screens recorded, but none of them will load.
Try Firefox Safe mode to see how it works there.
A way of solving problems, which disables most of the modules.
(If you use it, switch to the default theme).- You can open the mode without failure of Firefox 4.0 + by pressing the SHIFT key when you use the desktop Firefox or shortcut in the start menu.
- Or use the Help menu option, click restart with the disabled... modules while Firefox is running.
Do not choose anything at the moment, just use 'continue in safe mode.
To exit safe mode of Firefox, simply close Firefox and wait a few seconds before using the shortcut of Firefox (without the Shift key) to open it again.
If it's good in Firefox Safe mode, your problem is probably caused by an extension, and you need to understand that one.
http://support.Mozilla.com/en-us/KB/troubleshooting+extensions+and+themesWhen find you what is causing that, please let us know. It might help others who have this problem.
-
Firefox 5 works fine, but as soon as I install 6 and try to run it, it gives me this error msg:
"XML Parsing Error: undefined entity location: chrome://browser/content/browser.xul line number 233, column 5: key-^ =" "< =" "id ="key_scratchpad"keycode =" & amp; scratchpad.keycode; ' modifiers = "Shift" p = "" > < / key > ""
He also said during installation that it can not find updates for Java and Skype extensions.
If this does not work in mode without failure, then disable all extensions and then try to find out who is the cause by allowing both the problem reappears.
- Choose "Disable all add-ons" on issues to troubleshoot Firefox in Safe Mode to set window to disable all extensions.
- Close and restart Firefox after each change through "file > exit ' (Mac: ' Firefox > leave";) Linux: "file > exit ')
Remove extensions that do not have a button in the extension manager are installed by other programs and should be disabled or updated via this software.
You can uninstall and remove extensions of the Java Console, you do not need to run Java applets.
See:
-
"Error message has been: XML Parsing Error: undefined entity location: on: sync-tabs line number 7, column 1: window (weeks =" "3 =" "4 =" "5 =" "7 =" "< =" "^ =" "a =" "Add - on. =" "it y =" ' am = "" a = "" and = "" are = "" avg = "" believe = "" time = "" but = "" impossible = "" some = "" computers = "" firefox = "" for = "" I = "" I = "" id = 'tabs-view' in = "" installed.. = "" it = "" months) = "" = "" on. "" "" "" "" = "" or = "" other = "" p = "" paid = "" remember = "" running = "" sometimes = "" sync = "" tabs = "" version = "" look a = "" was = "" we = "" some = "" when = "" windows = "" worked = "" > < / window > "
Hello!
Can you give us some details? When this message display? Is in your phone or your computer? What is your language? More information you can give us the best.
You use the add-on and Firefox 4? If so, I'll ask you to disable and remove the add-on: Sync is now part of the Firefox browser and you don't need the add-on. [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644894 some users solved this problem by uninstalling the add-on.]
] -
Speed Dial gives me an XML parsing error: no element found
Have set up the Speed Dial and also set it as homepage. But when I then open Firefox, speed dial does not work and I get:
XML Parsing Error: no element found
Have retried reloading Speed Dial twice, and this happens every time. I am running Firefox 3.6.16.There is an extension conflict. See this article: blog of Speed Dial on this problem article
-
Analyzer of sequence running from the command line in TestStand 2010
Hello
I would like to be able to run and control the stand-alone command line sequence Analyzer. I can do that in 2014 TS (and it seems that I could patch versions as soon as 2012 TS to give them this ability), as described here: http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/B927893F26BFB64A86257ECE006E442D
However, I work with a large existing codebase in 2010 TS (with no intention to migrate to a newer version, in the foreseeable future). Is it possible to get the same functionality from command line in the 2010 version of the parser?
I know that I can open the command line parser, but are the commands, I am interested in: analyze, report, / save, /clearMessagesOnSave, / minimize, / help, / / leave.
Thank you!
Thanks Ryan, Jigg,
Yes, I can run the parser (and opened a project), but basically, I can't run anything.
I realized what I do by writing a TestStand sequence that calls the parser to sequence through its API (attached). I can then run TestStand (and call this sequence) from the command line.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Satellite L650 - How can I reinstall Win7 64-bit
I recently got my L650 - about 3 weeks ago. There are 2 options first boot - up to install 32-bit or 64-bit Windows 7 Home Premium. I chose 32-bit.Is there a way I can factory reset this if I get the first new startup message because I would like to
-
Opening reassociating/merger with Photos library: help
I did my due diligence by reading the previous posts on this topic, but I stay confused because I found enough previous posts about my specific question/situation. So, here goes. When first Photos are out with Yosemite, I chose to continue using Ape
-
Keithley 2400 smooth change of output range
Hello I use a Keithley 2400 current source to drive a Peltier module to control the temperature (object multilayer temperature shielded inside a vacuum chamber) with PID. The process value (PV) is measured with a Keithley connected to a balanced spec
-
Running a Subvi independently in a stacked sequence
Of expensive Labviewer. We have an instrument that is controlled by a labview program. The program consists of a bunch of operations in sequence and each operation is implemented using sequences la_ROSE923/flat. At some point in the sequence, I want
-
Upgrade to Windows live 2011 today. Picture of Windows Glallery is not the same. There is no cropping, etc. color correction Can we get these feature. I tried to download it again, but received a message that says that I already have a newer vers