RV220W issue of VLAN

Similar Questions

• SG300 Issue of Vlanning

  Hi guys

  I was hoping someone could give me a pointer on a configuration problem of Vlan I have.

  Environment

  Cisco S300-10 switch (set to the L3 Mode)

  I downloaded a newb drawing my config switch in the hope that this can help

  Of my Office Pc I see the following symptoms

  (1) I CAN ping to the interface Vlan 2 (which is 192.168.1.1)

  (2) I can NOT however ping all machines within Vlan 2 (for example 192.168.1.2)

  (3) I can't ping interface Vlan 3 (which is 10.0.0.1)

  Worth Mentioning as it isn't the drawing that I did, but the desktop pc has additional 192.168.1.200 & 10.0.0.200 ip addresses

  From Vlan 2 I see the following symptoms

  (1) I CAN ping all other interfaces (for example, 10.0.0.1 & 192.168.0.102) virtual LAN

  (2) I CAN ping all machines within Vlan 2

  VLAN 2 Machines with an interface Vlan defined as their gateway (192.168.1.1 for example) I read that link for what I

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/disc...r-VLAN-routing

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you

  Martyn

  On the router do you have routes to networks on the switch?

  For example:

  IP 10.0.0.0 sm 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.0.102

  SM IP 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.0.102

  And I will assume that you have a default route on the switch to the router?

  For example:

  SM IP 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 gw 192.168.0.1

• Question of VLAN by default and best practices

  Hi all

  I recently read on VMwares ESX Server 802. 1 q-paper Solutions of VLAN and came across the following article:

  Question of VLAN native (aka "VLAN1 Issues")

  "VLAN native is used to switch protocol management and control.  Native frames of VLAN is not VLAN ID tag in many types of switches, and in which case the trunk ports implicitly treat all frames not marked as frame VLAN native.

  VLAN 1 is the native VLAN ID by default for most Cisco switches.  However, in many enterprise networks, the VLAN is the VLAN 1 or 100, it could be any number depending on your configuration of switch type and running.

  It is common recommended to avoid using some VLAN native (often the VLAN 1) for any regular data traffic.  VMware recommends that you not associate any group native virutal server ESX VLAN VLAN ID switch port.  Also, so that you avoid them VLAN native for your groups of ports VLAN, no native VLAN related configuration is required on ESX Server systems. »

  That being said, I know a lot of people and more small to medium-sized networks leave light network VLAN by default.  If this is the case it would be better to change the entire network switching to one VLAN different and then put groups of ports on the same VLAN?  Or is the problem with the default VLAN really does not impact?

  Hello

  You have quite a few involved networks when you use virtualization and some I would classify as a virtualization host networks: the Service Console, VMotion, storage over IP.  They are more likely on separate networks of your VM network traffic... At least use VLAN to do this.

  See http://kensvirtualreality.wordpress.org for a good series of articles on virtual networks.

  Best regards
  Edward L. Haletky
  VMware communities user moderator, VMware vExpert 2009, Analyst of DABCC
  ====
  Now available on Rough Cuts: ' VMware vSphere (TM) and Virtual Infrastructure Security: ESX security and virtual environment '
  Also available "VMWare ESX Server in the enterprise"
  SearchVMware Pro| Blue gears. Top virtualization security links| Security Round Table Podcast virtualization

• RV220W Inter VLAN firewall rules

  Hello

  I just bought RV220W Cisco router for our branch to replace Zywall 2 Plus.  Update to the latest firmware 1.0.5.8 device.

  I tried several different setting, but can not solve simple inter configuration of VLAN, that ZyWall resolves in a few clicks.

  I have a simple task: I need two VLAN isolated on my network (VLAN 1: 10.1.2.1 and VLAN10: 192.168.2.1). No movement between them VLAN is allowed. I have to configure several exceptions:

  1.) access of VLAN1 to Server (192.168.2.40) from VLAN10 port 3389 (RDP).

  2.) VLAN10 access to a network printer (10.1.2.10) on port 9100 VLAN1.

  I tried several settings and configurations of firewall that does not work.

  I tried inter VLAN (VLAN-VLAN) rules to block all traffic except permitted, but these rules don't change anything.  I have full access to one VLAN to another and vice versa.

  I tried to disable routing inter VLAN, which solve my task of isolation, but firewall interVLAN rules does not work for exceptions, I need.

  Thanks for all your help in advance.

  Hello

  For this configuration, you must first uncheck InterVlan routing for both VLAN (network > LAN > belonging to a VLAN). Also make sure that the ports are propely configured-tag/Untagged/excluded

  After that, he must create access rules 2 (Inter MELANIECARDENES (VLAN - VLAN))

  -from Defaul to VLAN10 - always allow - Source all - Destination 192.168.2.40

  -Since VLAN10 to Default - always allow - Source all - Destination 10.1.2.10

  There is no need to create rules to block, as it is by default and interVLAN routing is not enabled.

  If with this configuration you still do not have access to the server and printer, you can use Administration - diagnosis - capture the packets and Wireshark to track if the packets are routed properly through VLANs and where the string stops.

  Kind regards

  Bismuth

• VLAN-RV220W - help needed

  Hello

  I'm having a problem with a new vlan on this router. The router uses the default firmware 1.0.0.26 because I can't use 1.0.1.0 because we have a DSL connection that requires PPPoE.

  Vlan1 is for our work and our SBS PC which acts also as the DHCP server. The router is configured with a static address and has disabled DHCP.

  VLAN5 is a group of PC, who cannot have access to the Internet and nothing else on the network. I made a few screenshots of the parameters.

  

  

  When I connect a PC port 4, a valid IP address is not received from the DHCP configured for VLAN5, instead the PC receives an address IP of SBS located on VLAN1, it also shows that I am connected to the local domain on VLAN1. Me missing something, is there something else that needs parameters. I can't understand why I don't get a 192.168.5.0 address.

  My VLAN10 secure wireless works very well and receives the correct IP address.

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Michael.

  Michael,

  Well have gone through your messages and also set up a similar configuration in our laboratory. Note that I had trouble; no problem with the RV220W, but rather the switch was close one of the ports connected to RV220W. So I went to the SG - 302 switch and disabled STP on this port and everything started to work very well. So, it is probably similar in your case too. Also if the netgear is a fully managed switch, why don't you just truck two virtual networks on the same port. This will release two ports in your network. you mentioned that you receive an ip address of the vlan 1 when you were connected to the vlan 10, even with your configuration file, I haven't lived something like this. On the wireless side you can reconnect each SSID and the test. Tests you want to make sure that you do an ipconfig/release () and (ipconfig / renew) your IP stack could keep your permeable connected network settings.

  Thank you

  Jason Bryant

  Support Cisco engineer

  .:|:.:|:.

• Cisco Small Business Equipment VLAN security issue

  Hi, I have a RV220W router and a switch SG200-18. I'm trying to set up my network to be as secure as possible...

  The RV220W has the configuration of VLAN next:

  Port 1: Manage, DMZ, Business, Test, Diag, home and anywhere (not identified)

  Port 2-4: not used (unidentified) and people with DISABILITIES

  All ports were excluded from the default VLAN

  SG200-18 has the configuration of VLAN next:

  Port 1 (trunk): manage, DMZ, Business, Test, Diag, home and anywhere (not identified)

  Port 2-17 (access): not used (unidentified) and people with DISABILITIES

  Port 18 (access): manage (unlabeled) * used to configure and manage the switching and routing of a pc

  All ports were excluded from the default VLAN

  I installed this according to the instructions in the Cisco security best practices: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca6000/prodlit/vlnwp_wp.pdf

  My questions regarding my network of quenching of Double-Encapsulated 802. 1 q / attack of VLAN nested. The white paper suggests to disable the VLAN native/unidentified all trunk ports... Unfortunately the RV220W seems to require a VLAN without label on each port (won't allow me to only have the tag VLAN)... Can someone suggest a more secure configuration given that I work with?

  Thank you!

  P.S. the switch allows me to configure a port mode 'General' where I can configure the frame Type to "Admit tag only" to allow only traffic labeled... I don't know if this would increase security?

  In what concerns the vlan tag/UNTAG Yes. You must take into account the limitation of the router.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• RV220W second problem of DHCP vlan

  Hi all

  I have a router Cisco RV220W (the 1.0.4.17 firmware version).

  I would like to have two separate networks with the following characteristics:

  Netwrork1: network address range is 192.168.0.1 - 254. All devices should be able to reach eachother within this network and connect you to the internet via Wifi or LAN. This network, I was also able to reach the device on the router management page. Also the devices should get the throgh of DHCP ip addresses.

  Network2: network address range is 192.168.5.1 - 254. All devices within this network should not be able to reach devices in Network1. All devices on this network should reach internet through Wifi only. Device management page should not be available on this network.

  I have configured the router as described in the attached screenshots, but the problem is that in Network2, devices get IPs of the range 192.168.0.1 - 254 and not from 192.168.5.1 beach - 254. Also, there is no internet on these either.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Mate, honestly I don't think that there is an explanation here. It doesn't seem to work as it should. I personally default from Router 2 ssid, 2 VLANs and test from there before you make additional configurations.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• RV220W works only with the PPTP server on one VLAN only

  Hello

  I have a RV220W (firmware 1.0.3.5) but I can't seem to work with the PPTP server on one VLAN only.

  My default VLAN is in 192.168.1.1/24.

  I created a VLAN ID 10 in 192.168.50.1/24 inter - vlan routing: disabled and device management: disabled.

  (Menu network > LAN > belonging to a VLAN and multiple VIRTUAL local network subnets).

  Then I configured a PPTP server on the IP 192.168.50.200 to 192.168.50.210 range.

  Finally, I created my user.

  (Menu VPN > IPSEC > VPN users).

  The PPTP tunnel is at work, but on all of my local network and not only the VLAN ID 10.

  Any idea? ...

  This seems to be a limitation of the firmware 1.0.3.5. Firmware 1.0.4.x will support the rules on access inter - VLAN, which I hope, can be used to restrict traffic VLAN by default your VLAN ID 10.

• Question of RV220W VLAN / routing (setting up network comments)

  I added two wireless networks in my RV220W. One is intended for customers and must not allow them to go outside on the WAN. But I'm wrong how to set up.

  I created a second LAN VIRTUAL (192.168.3.xxx) and awarded "comments network." But how do I set up my RV220W such that these guests can go to the WAN? And how to mix it with the fact that NAT between the external WAN and the internal network is in the 192.168.2.xxx range? Can I do anything?

  Please try disabling routing inter - VLAN of the guest VLAN.

  The two VLAN will share the same WAN connection for internet access, i.e. two subnets are translated.

• VLAN in environment ESXi5 Switch Cisco SG300 and gateway RV220W

  Hi, I'm having a few problems getting VLANing to work properly.  I was hoping that someone would be able to point me in the right direction.  I spend a RV220W which has 2 VLANS on VLAN1 with a 192.168.1.x and VLAN 104 subnet with a subnet of 192.168.104.x.  Port 4 of the goes to port the SG300 Switch 20.  Port 20 switch SG300 has VLAN 1 as non-marked and labeled as VLAN104.  It also has the port configured in the same way 15 and 16.

  In my ESXi host NIC2 is in the 16 port and NIC3 is in port 15.  I created a Standard vSwitch1 and created two groups of ports.  192.168.104.x group has a vlan id of the 104 and group vmware with no id vlan.  I guess that when I put a virtual machine in vmware port group I would get the IP 192.168.1.x what I do.

  When I put a virtual machine in port 192.168.104.x I guess I should get an IP of 192.168.104.x, but I have not, I get a return address of loop group.

  Any ideas what I am doing wrong?  I'm assuming that by creating the port group 192.168.104.x with id VLAN 104 that is the vlan native untagged for this option, which would then send the traffic through the port 15 or 16 depending on the tag VLAN104.  That would be so only send traffic out port 20 to port 4 of the RV220W which should serve as a DHCP server for the this response as 192.168.104.1.

  Just at the moment where I think I have a handle on the VLAN, I'm wrong.

  Thank you

  I would recommend this:

  Configure an access port on SG300, with no trunking

  Configure it to VLAN 104

  Place your desktop on this VLAN

  Configure your desktop and virtual computer with a static IP address

  Test if they have connectivity

  This excludes the configuration of VMware and confirm that your trunk to the SG300 is operational.

• VLAN voice N3048P and DHCP issues

  Hello

  I just received several switches for our N3048P and 2 x 4048 access layer - WE for our base layer. Are the N3048P VLT'd between two of 4048. There are 4 x N3048P of one on the other. The 4048 possess all gateways via VRRP.

  I have 802. 1 x works with my Windows client test, and I can get the phone (Cisco 7941) to acquire a DHCP address if I put it on a port "switchport mode access. However, if I change the port to a general port with vlan enabled voice and 802. 1 x, the phone does not have a DHCP address, but the PC attached to the phone Gets a DHCP address in the VLAN correct.

  I see CDP and LLDP messages exchanged via Wireshark, and it seems that the phone and the switch are to exchange the VLAN voice correctly.

  My question is, why the phone can't one address DHCP?

  Here's the relevant config of switch below. I know that some of the config can be duplicated for troubleshooting steps:

  VLAN 75
  the name 'Test '.
  output
  VLAN 76
  name "Test_Phones".
  output

  IP helper-address 1.1.1.3 dhcp
  IP helper-address 1.1.1.4 dhcp

  interface vlan 75
  IP 172.16.75.4 255.255.255.0
  IP helper 1.1.1.3
  IP helper 1.1.1.4
  output
  interface vlan 76
  IP 172.16.76.4 255.255.255.0
  IP helper 1.1.1.3
  IP helper 1.1.1.4

  AAA authentication local connection to "defaultList".
  radius of start-stop AAA accounting dot1x default
  control-dot1x system-auth
  radius AAA dot1x default authentication service
  AAA authorization network default RADIUS

  VLAN, VoIP

  source-ip 172.16.75.4 RADIUS server
  Server RADIUS 'key' key
  RADIUS-server host 1.1.1.1 auth
  primary
  name "rad1.
  use of 802. 1 x
  key 'key '.
  output
  RADIUS-server host 1.1.1.2 auth
  name "rad2.
  use of 802. 1 x
  key 'key '.
  output
  Server RADIUS acct 1.1.1.1 host
  name "rad1.
  output
  host server RADIUS acct 1.1.1.2
  name "rad2.
  output

  Gi2/0/1 interface

  Description '802. 1 x client port.
  spanning tree portfast
  spanning tree guard root
  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 75-76 the tag
  dot1x re-authentication
  dot1x quiet-period 5
  dot1x tx-period 5
  dot1x comments - vlan 20
  dot1x Informati-vlan 20
  LLDP transmit tlv ESCR-sys sys - cap
  LLDP transmit-mgmt
  notification of LLDP
  LLDP-med confignotification
  VLAN voice 76
  disable voice vlan auth
  output

  Thanks for any input you may have. I would like to know if there is any other information, I can provide.

  -Jason

  That ends up being the correct port configuration:

  Gi2/0/1 interface

  Description '802. 1 x client port.

  spanning tree portfast

  switchport mode general

  switchport General pvid 75

  VLAN allowed switchport General add 75

  switchport general allowed vlan add 76 tag

  dot1x port-control on mac

  dot1x re-authentication

  dot1x quiet-period 5

  dot1x timeout supp-timeout 15

  dot1x tx-period 5

  dot1x comments-vlan-deadline 15

  dot1x comments - vlan 20

  dot1x Informati-vlan 20

  VLAN voice 76

  disable voice vlan auth

  The most important line here is «the dot1x port-control on mac» I got 'auto control by port dot1x' configured, but it does not work as expected. In addition, defining the comments-vlan-period and supp-timeout were necessary. If the port was shot, the switch would not necessarily reauth port.

• Issue of private VLAN

  Hello

  I want to configure private VLANs on cisco switch science I write this command (host of the private vlan switchport mode) on the interface automatically interface to go down, please help me

  I'm not sure that the 3560 supports VLAN private dashboard, but it supports the ports protected with "protected" switchport mode

  Here is the guide on this feature.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/switches/LAN/catalyst3560/software/release/12-2_52_se/configuration/guide/3560scg/swtrafc.html#wp1175133

• RV220W - implementation of support of VLAN

  Hello

  I'm new on the VLAN and wanted some comments about how I have the router configured prior to deployment.  I have 5 VLAN configured as follows:

  VLAN ID	Description	InterVLAN routing	Device management	Port 1	2 port	Port 3	Port 4
  1	By default	Activated	Activated	Not tagged	Not tagged	Not tagged	Not tagged
  2	Office	People with disabilities	Activated	The tag	The tag	The tag	The tag
  3	USDA	People with disabilities	Activated	The tag	The tag	The tag	The tag
  4	Cameras	People with disabilities	Activated	The tag	The tag	The tag	The tag
  5	Guests	People with disabilities	Activated	The tag	The tag	The tag	The tag

  The USDA and the cameras VLAN will be on the same track with a switch (I counted on MAC filtering help to differentiate) and the VIRTUAL office LAN will go to another switch (reservations MAC/IP using here), that the VLAN invited would be used for comments only, Wifi with this completely separate from other networks.

  Is there a better way to configure or what I need to do further adjustments?

  Any help is greatly appreciated!

  Fireman1224

  Hi Dwight,.

  I don't see why you would need this other router you always 4 Port you might use (based on what you wrote above) for the VLAN of the USDA.  If the device on the USDA must be reached outside a demilitarized zone would probably be the best bet.  Otherwise, this seems fine assuming that these two ports offices are connected only to the RV-Yes, it's a good idea to exclude any VLAN interfaces, on what you don't want them.

  -Good Trent

  * Please note the useful messages! **

• Configuration issue VLAN

  Hi all

  I'm a newbie on VLAN and spent a lot of time googleing and youtubeing trying to learn more about the virtual LAN, but now I'm stuck.

  I think I'll need upgrade to vSphere Enterprise Plus Standard so I can use the dswitch to specify local networks virtual, but not sure.

  Your expertise will be appreciated.

  That's what I'm trying to do.

  I need to put some of the vm (see Security Server) on the DMZ servers, and since they all share the same NETWORK card on the host, the only way to do it is by using the VIRTUAL LAN. (I think).

  Our network consists of:

  Cisco ASA 5510 - 3Com 4200G Switch - switch PowerConnect 2724 DELL

  Every PC on the LAN are connected to the 3Com switch.

  All 4.1 vSphere hosts are connected to the DELL PowerConnect 2724.

  VLAN 1 = LAN

  VLAN 2 = DMZ

  Cisco ASA 5510

  0 port: Connect to the Internet

  Port 1: Connect to 3Com switch 48-port

  3Com 4200 G

  Port 1-46: assigned to the vlan 1

  : 47 connected to DELL 24 Port switch, assigned as a trunk in vlan 1 and 2

  : 48 connected to Cisco ASA Port 1, assigned to vlan 1 and 2

  Reference DELL 2724 (Installer in question)

  1-23 port: assigned to the default vlan 1 for now.

  Port 24: As trunk assigned to the vlan 1 and 2.

  Port 1-2: connected to the VM NIC host where view Security Server and DMZ will be setup.

  I have installation subinterfaces on the Cisco ASA for VLAN1 and 2, thanks to engineer Cisco that helped me.

  Basically, we split an interface to use the 2 VLANS.

  But after its installation, the local network was not able to talk to the Cisco and vice versa. I ping the other PC or vSphere hosts on the local network, but cannot access the internet or Cisco. From the outside, you can connect to the Cisco but cannot ping the cisco LAN.

  Do I need to have some dSwitch on the vSphere host to install vlan1 and 2?

  I DO NOT use vlan1 since it was a vlan by default of the switch?

  Or are you a better solutions for our mess?

  Fine thanks

  See you soon.

  You allowed 101 VLAN on ports of junction on the physical switch on which the uplinks are connected?

  For an example of Cisco configuration, see http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1004074

  André

• Issue of V-Switch virtual network, possible configuration of VLAN

  A screenshot of doc word of my virtual network is attached. I'm trying to get my external labeled Virtual Switch (vSwitch2) talk to the VM (vSwitch0) network switch. My goal here is to be able to connect a physical PC into the switch labeled vmnic1 external physical and be able to convert a virtual PC VM via a cross over cable. I don't know that it would be in the same subnet as the network of VM vmic0. Do I have to install some kind of vlan etc... The physical box with XP on it can perhaps start with DHCP and enter an IP address on the same subnet bridged somehow of the external vmnic1 in the VM Network vmnic0. What is the easiest more quick to make this work? Please see the attachment.  Thanks in advance for your help

  Post edited by: vite@1

  You will need to open a new question, if that's what you're talking about.

  -KjB

  VMware vExpert