Server vertual very slow vs 2005

Similar Questions

• sometimes can not log into the server or very slow to make so.green bar downstairs is fully informed and he's there with the wheel spins as it tries to plug?

  Can't all the time. Many time running without problems. When problems seem not to be like that for a while as an e-mail message. Just did an email and wheel turn and try to send. "Cannot connect to Server" in my opinion, is what happens. Press Cancel, entered Envoy file to see if went thru (sometimes he does this when he says he did not send) not in the folder sent, has started the new email and redone and it sent fine?

  They told looks that the question of thunderbird and no provider?

  My sent file is small. Thought this might help then deleted more old that I did not move from customer records.

  If it does not work at the same time, but working again later, it is unlikely that the problem is with Thunderbird.

  You can try to disable email scanning in your antivirus software.

• The server 2008R2 very slow file transfer speed

  I have a server 2008R2 with 32Gigs of Ram and core 2 Quad processors.  When I copy a large file (200gigs) of a directory and paste to another local on the machine, transfer speed is about 6-10 Mbps.  Anyone know why this would happen?  It also happens on my virtual machine running the same operating system to 2008R2, but with the 2008R2, it is limited to 4 logical processors.

  Thanks for your time,

  Brandon

  Hello

  Support for Windows Server is not provided in these forums. On the other hand, it please repost your question in the relevant Microsoft TechNet forum here:

  Windows Server forums

  Thank you.

• Windows 2008 Server boots very slow

  My sweet model of Windows 2008 Server starts in 30 seconds (4vCPUs [I know these are many vCPUs and recommended is to use as little as possible, but our needs of applications of this amount of vCPUs]) and 768 MB of memory)

  If I give the 3072 MB model there 1 minute and 40 seconds to start, which is a normal value? What are your values? why it takes so long if I add a bunch of memory?

  good point!, you should not normally need to start.

  Did you measure the performance of your application with 2cpu against 4cpus?

• Terminal Server RDP is very slow!

  Hello!

  I have a small network with a domain controller Active Directory (Windows 2003) - including the Exchange, I had a Windows 2003 Terminal Server initially, but have replaced the Windows 2003 Terminal Server with a Terminal Windows 2008 Enterprise Server (not R2). Windows 2008 is a completely new system, not an upgrade.

  The problem is that the new Terminal Server ('08) is running very very slow one time the old 2003 Terminal Server is not present on the network. Although I use is no longer the old server, he seems to have an impact on the performance of the network.

  For example, if I should shut down the old server, the new server becomes very slow. It takes about 5 + minutes to services/applications load after you try to connect to the server using RDP. You get a white screen for a long time before the icons are loaded and everything works really slow, including Outlook. On the contrary, once the old server is started in Windows, the new server works very well.

  All servers are physical boxes and I'm not going to finally get rid of the old Terminal Windows 2003 server.

  When you configure the 2008 Terminal Server, I did transfer the IP address of the Terminal Server, the Terminal Server 2008 Server, 2003 server and give the old server a new IP address. I don't know if it has something to do with the behavior, but the old server is not used. It is initialized only to try to keep the stable network.

  Jale01

  Ask in the forum Windows Server:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer

• EBS 12.1.1 perfromance is very slow.

  Hi expert,

  Please suggest me a certain document for performance optimization. It's full use for me. for the OS and EBS 12.1.1.

  several times I check there is no additional process is running on my server, but the average load shows 5 or 6. I m sure about it there ' has no big query running, no not big users connect. Here, there is no no matter what process is running on the server because this server is slow.

  I m unable to determine why the server is very slow and show very high load average (top) and the application is very slow.

  the server is IBM with 16 RAM.

  OS - RHEL 5.7

  EBS - 12.1.1

  THE SIZE OF THE DATABASE - 350GB

  Please suggest me how can I solve the poor performance of the OS and the EBS.

  Thanks and greetings

  pritesh Rodriguez

  Hi Ranjan Pritesh,

  When was the last time you ran the program of "gathering statistical scheme." Is it planned?

  In addition, please see:

  Troubleshooting problems of performance of the Oracle Applications (Doc ID 169935.1)

  Optimize the performance of the e-Business Suite (Doc ID 744143.1) downstairs X-ray

  A comprehensive approach to the performance of Oracle Applications systems (Doc ID 69565.1)

  Simultaneous treatment - how to performance tune the concurrent processing server (Doc ID 986272.1)

  Performance forms listener Servlet in Oracle Applications (Doc ID 390031.1)

  Thank you &

  Best regards

• Reset is very slow to a Mac Mini server (mid 2011) what I'm doing. 2 GHz Intel Core i7 processors and 4 GB of RAM

  Reboot and everythingis very slow a Mac mini Server (mid 2011) what I'm doing. 2 GHz Intel Core i7 processors and 4 GB of RAM. Using OS X El Capitan

  What do you mean by slow?

  When slowing down

  Run and view the results here so that we know more about your configuration.

  http://etrecheck.com/

  EtreCheck

• Updates very slow XP - SP3 crashes and the connection to the server fails

  original title: updates very slow XP

  I have two xp computers and updated running is very, very, slow down or failed to connect to the Microsoft website. The second computer, a laptop, is a special purpose computer, so I have no installed virus. SP3 is has crashed-out (3) time up here this morning. I tried to download sp3 for a manual install and the flow has dropped up to 2.2 k, then showed it failed to connect to the server. I know it is not my internet connection because the computer runs well so far here. I'm the only one.

  Thanks for your help.

  Hello

  Scan the computer for viruses:
  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx

  Reset the Internet Explorer settings:

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/923737

  Disable the security software and then try to download the sp3:

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/950717

• Very slow to load on a Windows Server 2012R2 PowerCLI

  Hi all

  PowerCLI 5.5 is very slow to load on my Windows 2012R2 server, I did a few tests

  Test 1 - load the snap of PS on my worstation (8.1 for Windows 64-bit - SATA hard drive)

  PS C:\Users\MyUser > Measure-Command {Add-PSSnapin vmware.vimautomation.core}

  Days: 0

  Hours: 0

  Minutes: 0

  Seconds: 1

  Milliseconds: 871

  Ticks: 18717065

  TotalDays: 2.16632696759259E - 05

  TotalHours: 0.000519918472222222

  TotalMinutes: 0.0311951083333333

  TotalSeconds: 1.8717065

  TotalMilliseconds: 1871.7065

  Test 2 - snap of PS of load on a 2012R2 Windows Server not connected to the internet, check on CRL

  PS C:\Users\MyUser > Measure-Command {Add-PSSnapin vmware.vimautomation.core}

  Days: 0

  Hours: 0

  Minutes: 0

  Seconds: 51

  Milliseconds: 603

  Ticks: 516030768

  TotalDays: 0.000597257833333333

  TotalHours: 0.014334188

  TotalMinutes: 0.86005128

  TotalSeconds: 51.6030768

  TotalMilliseconds: 51603.0768

  
  

  
  Test 3 - support software component PS plug-in on a Windows Server 2012R2 not connected to the internet, check CRL disabled

  PS C:\Windows\system32 > Measure-Command {Add-PSSnapin vmware.vimautomation.core}

  Days: 0

  Hours: 0

  Minutes: 0

  Seconds: 16

  Milliseconds: 323

  Ticks: 163238507

  TotalDays: 0.000188933457175926

  TotalHours: 0.00453440297222222

  TotalMinutes: 0.272064178333333

  TotalSeconds: 16.3238507

  TotalMilliseconds: 16323.8507

  As you can see there is an improvement when I disable CRL checking in accordance with this article: http://blogs.vmware.com/PowerCLI/2010/01/troubleshooting-slow-startup-with-powercli-40-u1.html

  But I still have 16 seconds to load the snap against 1 second on my workstation (which has much less computer resources!)

  Any help is appreciated.

  Hi LucD,

  I've found a workaround:

  When I run the import-PSSnapin I noticed (with wireshark) a lot of traffic failed to WAN addresses, so I set myself, in Internet Options a false proxy (127.0.0.1), excluding the proxy DNS of my domain active directory name (so I can connect to the virtual center without going through the wrong proxy)

  Now is the time of execution:

  Windows PowerShell

  Copyright (C) 2013 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

  PS C:\Users\MyUser > Measure-Command {Add-PSSnapin vmware.vimautomation.core}

  Days: 0

  Hours: 0

  Minutes: 0

  Seconds: 2

  Milliseconds: 774

  Ticks: 27745259

  TotalDays: 3.2112568287037E - 05

  TotalHours: 0.000770701638888889

  TotalMinutes: 0.0462420983333333

  TotalSeconds: 2.7745259

  TotalMilliseconds: 2774.5259

  Not bad! Execution time lowered 16 sec at 2.8 sec

• Very slow server file transfer client

  Hello

  I am currently using application 6i and even I am converted forms 11g. However, I found that the transfer of files from Client to server weblogic is very slow. My 6i application takes 20 seconds for all 5 mb upload while 11g takes 40sec to copy a file to server weblogic only FTP get and finally download beginning so full download completed around more than 1 minute.

  Download same front end are little slow

  Can anyone guide on this

  Thanks in advance

  Vishal

  
  

  How you export your file on the application server? with webutil? also that

  My 6i application takes 20 seconds for all 5 mb upload while 11g takes 40sec to copy a file to server weblogic only FTP get and finally download beginning so full download completed around more than 1 minute.

  What has the FTP to do with it?

  see you soon

• Backups Time Machine very slow on 2015 MacBook Air

  Associated with a topic of discussion between a few days ago (two MacBooks, 10.11.4, a fast Time Machine backup and a very slow), I start a new topic with new information that seem to show it is a problem more general and not related to Time Machine networks.

  Here's the situation:

  • A 2015 MacBook Air, 10.11.4, 8 GB / 512 GB, has extremely slow performance of backup Time Machine, taking 40 hours for the first 300 GB backup and incremental backups for a long time as well
  • TM performance is essentially the same whether on the network (wired Ethernet) or a USB3 external disk
  • When you back up to disk USB3, I confirmed that the information system shows that the port is configured as USB3, not USB2 (nothing else is plugged into the USB port)
  • Tests of bandwidth I/O gross (using dd and iperf) show no problem; the network reached 110 MB/s bandwidth, written network managed at 50 Mbps, external USB3 HD written work at 40-50 MB/s (write hard drive speed limit)
  • 3 other Macs of various ages from 2009-2014 on the same network have no problem at all do backups Time Machine Network; a backup complete first on a 2011 MacBook Pro 500 GB takes 5 hours or more than 10 x faster than the MBA problem
  • Time machine network uses a Linux server running the latest Debian and Netatalk 3.1.8 and the connection is via a USB3/Gigabit adapter, no WiFi, and iperf tests with this arrangement shows 900 MB/s of throughput of the server.  In all cases, the Time Machine and external time Machine Network USB HD have the same symptoms.
  • The problem with MacBook Air is configured the same as the MacBook Pro 2011, which she replaced "daily driver", possible
  • This problem was shown by the MBA since his unboxing conversion, taking 20 hours for his first backup once Setup initially.  Incremental backups now take several hours, leading to interrupted incremental backups and, I believe, databases corrupted backup triggers new full backups that take today the 40 hours.

  Using Terminal Server and iostat, Console, etc, I see that there is significant activity e/s for the backup drive on the order of 20 to 40 MB/s for long periods on the MBA during the TM backup, but during that time the average declared backup size as shown in the window in the console and TM is growing by only 5 GB/hour.  This occur even if the backup will the external drive or a network drive. This seems to mean that the I/O bandwidth to and from the disk hard external, only 1/600 contributes to the progress of the backup.  I am sure that there is overload of certain checks and other tasks, but not to a 600-to-1 ratio.

  I tried to disable the limitation of the I/O of low priority as shown here: http://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/212537/time-machine-ridiculously-slow-a close-el-capitan-upgrade, that helps a bit (maybe 20-30%), but not by a factor of 10 for others.

  I have gone through a number of the Time Machine of Pondini troubleshooting steps, but he found nothing corresponding to these symptoms.

  The only thing I can conclude is that Time Machine, the application or configuration, on this specific MBA, is down. (A single thought that I wrote this to the top that I have not tried: the MBA and the time MBP running VMware Fusion and have a file of 50 + GB VM; on the MBA that is not excluded from TM backups while on the MBP is)

  Does anyone have advice on what to watch next?  In all cases, only one key would be why it seems that only 0.16% of all the bandwidth I/O to the backup drive seems to be actual data backup.

  Once again, three other Macs, all running the same 10.11.4, back to the Time Machine Server perfectly and have for years.  Only this new MBA glue as broken out, either to a network drive or an external hard drive USB3.

  (A single thought that I wrote this to the top that I have not tried: the MBA and the time MBP running VMware Fusion and have a file of 50 + GB VM; on the MBA that is not excluded from TM backups while on the MBP is)

  What happens when you exclude it as the MBP?

• Firefox 10 - installed and the performance is very slow, unresponsive while trying to load websites.

  Just noticed the other day on my server and it could have been thought Nvidia driver. Update that and same result with Firefox very slow in delay/performance while making the web pages? Downgraded to Firefox 9.0 and problem solved. Return to previous performance levels.

  Just received and installed the update for Firefox worm 10.02 and voila... all the symptoms of the problems I had been able to correct themselves? Always curious what the issue was with my install in Server 2008? Have the latest Firefox installed in Fedora 16-64 bit and works without a problem. I have dual boot this machine between the two O/S once again, thanks to all who offered suggestions or advice about my problems.

• 7 Firefox is very slow to opening pages as compared Web o firefox6

  Compared to firefox6, this version, ff ver # 7.0.1 is very slow to open Web pages. It takes a long time to display the Web page. I tried to disable add ons and did everything I could, but it seems that there is a no solution.

  One possible cause is security software (firewall) that blocks or limits Firefox or plugin-container process without informing you, possibly after the detection of changes (update) for the Firefox program.

  Delete all rules for Firefox in the list of permissions in the firewall and leave your firewall again ask permission to get full unlimited access to the internet for Firefox and the plugin-container and the update process.

  See:

  • https://support.Mozilla.com/kb/server+not+found
  • https://support.Mozilla.com/kb/firewalls

• Satellite U920T/01Y - very slow internet

  I just bought a U920T Satellite. It runs at very slow speeds of the internet. Speedtest shows generally between 1 and 2 Mbps I have tried other than laptops sitting next to him, I can get a speed of 18-20mbps.

  Y at - it a driver update will fix this or is it a hardware failure it will take to repair?

  Hardware failure?
  I doubt

  First of all, it would be interesting to know what link are you using? LAN or WLan?

  Second: the laptop was connected to the power adapter or its operation with battery?

  Third: internet speed depends on connection internet, server, and all the devices that share the same line so if several laptops and other devices are connected to the same router, the data rate could be lower

• After update for HP UPD PCL 5 on the network drivers, local printers now very slow printing

  I've recently updated the HP Universal Print Driver PCL 5 on my Windows 2008 R2 file and print server.  All printers on network HP 5 now show the new driver of the UPD PCL 5, and 5 all seems to work fine from all clients on the attached network.

  However, as soon as I had updated the drivers from server, anyone with a printer connected locally HP began to test response times very slow when trying to print jobs to their local printer or even bring up the properties of the local printer.  I think that it is because local printers also use the HP UPD PCL5 driver, and something "broke" when I updated the driver on the server.   If the local printer is set as default, trying to make it appear a Properties dialog box takes several seconds (before it was instant), and clicking PRINT in any application results in a noticeable delay for the print dialog box to appear, followed by another notable delay (as in 10-20 seconds) before work is treated and control the application returned ot the user.  The printer takes then to another a few seconds to process work.  Essentially print jobs local just went from 5 seconds to 30 seconds or more for each task to start to print more.  This is unacceptable.

  I tried to remove all printers on network among the PC client, and then deleting the local printer as well.  I restarted, then used the install.exe HP UPD PCL 5 to start the installation on the local computer, choosing to do an installation of USB.  I turned on the printer local return and it has been recognized and loaded the new HP UPD PCL5 driver, but the problem persists.

  So after messing around with this more yesterday I think I narrowed down it to a port number.  It seems that when computers with local printers connected downloaded the new UPD PCL 5 form the network (updated their drivers for network printer), he reconfigured the USB port for each printer connected locally.  The USB port on the local printer will now appear as "DOT4 generic IEEE 1284.4 support printing", while before I'm pretty sure he showed as "DOT4 HP Laserjet one."   This white paper (which is unfortunately for Windows XP) appears to support the hypothesis that the port has changed and that the generic port is much slower (this is what we see now with local printers).  White paper on the issue of generic DOT4 port

  I tried to delete all printers that use the UPD from a local system and then using the install.exe form the UPD package to install the local printer as a USB printer (disconnection of the latter before installation and then in reconnecting it when you are prompted by Setup), still the same generic port is re-created.  How can I change the generic port to a specific port HP driver for printers normally respond again?

  Furthermore, I opened a ticket with the help of HP on the issue Monday afternoon, it is now Wednesday morning and the only response I received was a request to make sure that my cables were not more than 6' long.  Seriously HP support?

  My best guess is that you do not use the name of specific driver to the version on the print server.   Driver version-specific name will look like "HP Universal printing PCL6 (v5.9.0).   Non-specific to the version name will look like "HP Universal PCL6 print.

  When you work with print servers, it is recommended to use the name of the version-specifc driver.   I think what happened here are that the driver has been updated on the server, and this update was then pushed to clients through point and print because the pilots names.

  You have indicated that you are using the PCL5 driver.   In a general office print PCL6 offers the best combination of performance and print quality.   I recommend you go to PCL6 immediately, unless your devices or custom applications/solutions are not compatible with PCL6.  (This is very rare)

  If it were my system, here's what I'd do.

  1. Download UPD PCL6 5.9.0 and PARK of www.hp.com/go/upd
  2. Install the UPD PCL6 5.9.0 on my print server using the name specific to the version - create a temporary queue.
  3. Run AutoUpgradeUPD.exe from the PARK to remove queues existing impression on my print server and re-create them with the PCL6 driver.   (See http://youtu.be/mYCVx1RBp9w for more information on this utility)
  4. Remove the temporary queue
  5. On my clients, I would remove the existing printer USB connections.
  6. Run the UPD PCL6 5.9.0 installer and select the USB - Plug and Play mode and make sure that both check boxes are enabled.
  7. Re-connect local printers.

  Something else I could try to implement PRNCON of the PARK on each client.    It will be delete and re-create the connections to printer to the print server.    This can be run without command-line switches, but I like to use the '-2000 w' command to force a second 2 the delay between the removal of the printer connection and recreate.

  In a last time, I'll make sure to remove any old/unused drivers from the print server.