Should I "update" my version of LabVIEW?

Similar Questions

• Should I update my Intel motherboard drivers?

  I own a PC Intel D945GCNL Motherboard and Microsoft Windows XP Professional Version 2002 Service Pack 3 operating system. I am a user of Home PC and my PC is also supported 32-bit in the display and the version of DirectX 9 .0c for multimedia.

  My question:

  Is this OK to update the drivers from the Intel Download Center?

  For an example:

  (1) now I have Realtek HD Audio Driver 5.10.0.5404 in my PC. Intel Download Center shows that for Intel D945GCNL motherboard equipped with the Microsoft Windows XP Professional operating system, there is a latest audio driver (released 09/23/2010) called Realtek driver Audio ALC, which installs the version of the audio driver Realtek 6196. Is this OK to download this new driver?

  (2) now I have Realtek Ethernet LAN Driver 5.664.205.2007 in my PC. Intel Download Center shows that for Intel D945GCNL motherboard with the Professional Microsoft Windows XP operating system, there is a latest driver LAN (published 02/08/2010) named as version 5,764. Is this OK to download this new driver?

  (3) Similarly, should I update the version of the graphics driver, too?

  Please give me your wisdom, advice, comments for this problem!

  suresh87 is correct, you need to update the drivers you listed on the Intel site .  Card mother Intel® D945GCL has the Realtek ALC888, Realtek RTL811B-GR and the Intel® 945GC chipset (which includes the Intel® 82945GC Express Chipset Graphics Memory Controller Hub) as embedded devices.  With what is the case, the Intel® Web site is thefavorite of all the drivers of the said source.  Intel was able to customizations for all Realtek drivers specific to their use on their D945GCL which all drivers that you might find elsewhere will not be included.

  Once you have downloaded and installed the drivers above, you can run DirectX® end-user Runtime Web install dxwebsetup.exe from Microsoft, , because it will download and update software DirectX v9.0c pilots who may be out of date on your system.

  Vote if you find it useful.  Click on brand or propose as answer if that answers your question.  This will allow more quickly find that answer in the future.

• Why isn't my Windows Update Agent update to version 7.6.7600.256 as KB949104 says it should?

  OS: Windows XP Professional SP3

  They have recently tightened the Windows UPDATE agent to treat the virus of the flame by the update to version 7.6.7600.256.

  Of KB949104...

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  How to obtain the latest Windows Update Agent if Windows Update or the automatic updates is enabled, the latest version of the Windows Update Agent will be automatically downloaded and installed on your computer. If you go to Windows Update until it is installed automatically, you will see a message to install the Windows Update Agent:
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  I visited Windows Update et.256 is not available. I currently have 7.4.7600.226.

  I also did an experience in a virtual XP machine:
  I drove in arriere.226 to what comes of the actions on XP SP3 and WU then visited. 226, which was not installed pas.256.

  I also have a Windows 7 running in a virtual machine and one notices not to come through, but this guy doesn't.

  Also, why isn't the redistributable not offered by download? Those of us who do CDs unattended need.

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  There is no stand-alone installer for the latest version of the Windows Update Agent (7.6.7600.256). Here are instructions on how to get the version of the Windows Update Agent 7.4.7600.226.

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Of http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946928

  Looks like they finally leave the valves on that. My Google for the keyword 7.6.7600.256 alerts has been non-stop for the last 24 hours. All my systems to update recently.

  I really doubt that they were not shut down at the same time to lighten the load on the servers since a patch work Tuesday them probably 1 million fold more difficult.

• "VI a error 1002288.The full version of LabVIEW Development is necessary to correct the errors."

  Hello

  I had created an executable in LabVIEW 8.6 on a PC windows XP 32-bit. The application uses some screws of Vision. The executable is running in most of the PC except one. the PC is a windows 7 64 bit. I first got the error "Labview support 3 error code: could not load front". "" I fixed this by changing the settings of the source file in the application builder. Now I get the error message "VI a error 1002288.The full version of LabVIEW Development is necessary to correct the errors"and the exe displays a run button broken.»

  But if I build the exe in the same PC I get no error and it works very well. Moreover, I tested this exe in another PC with the same configuration, it works. I tried to reinstall labview in the PC, the problem persists.

  Hi Nitrox,

  There is no official adapter for LabVIEW 8.6 in Windows 7. See link below.

  www.ni.com/LabVIEW/OS-support/

  Upgrade to SP1 LV2009 should solve your problem. We had this problem with another client and update SP1 LV2009 solved his problem and should solve your problem too. If you have a problem after the update let me know.

  Kind regards

  Christophe P

  Technical sales engineer

  National Instruments

• Identify the official gcc (or supported) version for a given version of Labview

  As far as I know, there is no web page OR identify the official (or at least, taken in charge) gcc / g ++ version for a LabVIEW given output.

  By "official version", I mean one that is binary compatible with LabVIEW executable file (i.e. the binary).

  NOR must provide this information (as well as The Mathworks for Matlab). Here, here's a tip for vs information:

  1. the cd in your install directory local labview (i.e. the binary labview where)

  2. type the following command: strings. / labview | grep GLIBCXX

  3. identify the GLIBCXX version (i.e. stdlibc ++) highest in the resulting list (say GLIBCXX_3.4.9 for LabVIEW 13)

  4. open your favorite web browser and visit the gcc ABI policy and guidelines page

  5. search for GLIBCXX identified in step 3 (which is GLIBCXX_3.4.9 in our case)

  6. you should find something like: GCC 4.2.0: GLIBCXX_3.4.9

  7 pray have the corresponding version of gcc (i.e. 4.2.0 here) installed on your host computer or, at least, to have the corresponding manual available for your platform

  8. If step 7 fails, be prepared either: recompile the gcc version required, upgrade your operating system, or update your copy of LabVIEW

  Hello

  It depends on the operating system you are using:

  http://zone.NI.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361G-01/lvhowto/compiling_cin_source/

  For Linux of LabVIEW, you have a list of libstdc ++ supported:

  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/4596349739E988088625761C005B197E

  LabVIEW windows, is Microsoft Visual C++:

  http://www.NI.com/white-paper/3056/en/

  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/6229347C7982CC81862576E30076A4AE?OpenDocument

  If you are using GCC reaaly, there are different workaround solution, withour support:

  http://forums.NI.com/T5/LabVIEW/creating-a-DLL-including-Manager-support-in-MinGW-GCC/TD-p/633123

  Best regards

• Should I update my Macbook 2009 end of El captain?

  My Macbook is an end of 2009 one, with an Intel Core 2 Duo 2.26 GHz processor, a chip of 8 GB 1067 MHz DDR3 memory and an NVIDIA GeForce 9400 M 256 MB graphics card. There are currently about OS X 10.9.5, and I've seen articles recently talk of a huge hole being patched in OSX recently. I know not if my Macbook update is worth the risk, because it works very well at the moment and I need for classes, but I don't want it to be dangerous. Should I update to El Captain, wait for macOS Sierra to do this, or keep on Mavericks?

  Thank you

  I can only say that the latest security updates are installed when you upgrade to the latest version of Mac OS X. Now El Capitan. If you wait or not depends on if Apple releases always updates to security for the Mavericks, and if you install these updates.

• Thunderbird starts by does not respond after the update to version 38

  I've updated to version 38.0 yesterday and since then whenever I open Thunderbird, he refuses to open and top watch does not respond. I have to close it via the Task Manager. What's past and how to fix it?

  > I tried in safe mode and it opens and I see my mail but when I try again to open it in mode normal it is just the same thing.

  This clearly suggests that something you added to Thunderbird or the operating system is causing at least some of your problems. If the problem occurs with the OS in normal mode and Thunderbird in SafeMode - http://support.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/kb/safe-mode - then you should suspect a program that is loaded by the operating system, such as antivirus. But if it helps me to http://support.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/kb/safe-mode , then the problem is related to an add-on, or accerlation of material found in tools | options | Advanced | General

• Should I update all the files from the Toshiba site after using the recovery CD

  I just used my recovery CD and update the Windows Update System.

  The question is: should I update all files in the files on this site download section as well?

  Usually after using the Toshiba Recovery CD everything should works and works correctly
  To my knowledge from time to time Toshiba has released new version of some tools or drivers. For example the BT stack will be developed all the time.
  But I think that if you have any problems with your system and peripherals, then you don't need t to update anything.
  Small is my opinion...

• HP Notebook X7W81UA #ABA: HP BIOS recommended update: should I update?

  Hey guys. I just bought a new PC for the school and the HP Support Assistant program recommends an update the BIOS. Now, I know that the update is available, but I also know that you should only update in general if there is a problem as the BIOS update is risky if not done correctly.
  
  Now since is a recommended update, I tried the update and there not twice. I don't want to keep taking chances to spoil a whole new machine just for an update which may even not been necessary in the first instance.

  What I would like to know what exactly this release Add/fix on this machine? I already searched the Internet but have failed to find a description for this particular update. If someone could please take a look at the attached screen shot and let me know what this update is for, I would be very grateful. At least then I could make an informed decision about the weather or not, I will try again this update.

  PC model: HP Notebook X7W81UA #ABA

  Current version of BIOS: Insyde F.09

  Suggested BIOS version: F.13Ap1

  Thank you.

  

  Hi @EnlightenedShad,
  
  Please become a member of the HP's Support Forums. I understand that you have a question about an update of the BIOS. I would like to help you to solve this problem today.

  All the drivers and the update can be found at www.support.hp.com.

  When I looked the F.13 BIOS Rev A.  the fix and improvements Watch - provides password recovery.

  I don't think that it is a mandatory update.

  Please keep me informed of the progress of things.

  If you need help, let me know and I will gladly make all that I can to help you.

  Please let me know if that solves the problem by marking this post as "accept as a Solution.
  To simply say thank you, click the Thumbs up below!

  Thank you.

• Set the latest version of Labview

  Hello

  If a PC has 2 (development) versions of Labview installed, for example Labview 2010 and 2012 of Labview, how does Teststand know what Labview adapter to use?

  I am wanting to avoid the situation where a newspaper operator (Windows), should open close Labview 2012, then open the Teststand operator Interface.

  If not followed then the operator Interface opens Labview 2010, which is not wanted.

  Thank you I could remove the old version of Labview and that each operator only has to open/close once Labview 2012.

  Y at - it a setting of all user/audience in Win XP and 7 which can be modified?

  Kind regards

  Gary.

  Or you can deploy your automation, so it does not use the development environment and it will automatically detect the correct version of the LV RTE.

  If all of the development environment, TestStand will use the current version of LabVIEW.  I think this could enlighten us: http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Change-currently-active-LV-version-in-batch-script/m-p/2422750#M7474...

  Here is another link on all of this:

  http://digital.NI.com/public.nsf/allkb/A3F87B8347E41363862575DD00139245?OpenDocument

  Hope this helps,

• Save as previous version of labview?

  We have a bunch of code LV2010 a guy in charge. changed, then saved using LV2011.  Yes I know we should be updated for 2011, but management is scared to update even though we have both.

  How do I save the code back in 2010.  No new 2011 have been included, only Visual cleanups were conducted.

  According to this, you've been programming LabVIEW for 20 years so I can hardly believe that you never looked in the file menu. You can make the previous record either your VI high level or your project.

• Version of LabVIEW for Vision Builder AI 2012 plugins

  Hi all

  II was a little challenging to find out what version of LabVIEW has been necessary to develop customized Vision Builder AI 2012 plugins, I found it by starting the installer, LabVIEW 2011 (but I wish I could find this information in the Readme of Vision Builder AI 2012).

  Now my question is: is it possible to use LabVIEW 2011 SP1 to develop plugins for Vision Builder AI 2012?

  Right... I tried, I installed all versions VBAI and LabVIEW, I could.

  I turns out LV 2011 sp1 is just an update of 2011 and so LV2011 SP1 can be used to develop customized Vision Builder AI 2012 plugins.

• LV load error code 9:VI version (13.0) is newer than the version of LabVIEW (11.0)

  Hello

  We have a copy of LV2013 and several copies of a LV2011 running. A project of LV originally written in LV 2011 was opened by the LV2013 and then saved in LV2013. Now when LV 2011 tries to open the project, there are very few errors loading.

  As it appears on the pop-up error;

  "LabVIEW: file version is later than the latest version of LabVIEW.".

  An error occurred loading VI ' Series.lvlib: Close .vi 178XB BK precision.

  "LabVIEW support 9 error code: version of VI (13.0) is newer than the version of LabVIEW (11.0).

  Currently, the LV2011 to LV2013 update is not an option. Then there is other ways to solve this problem?

  Please help, thanks in advance.

  Open the project (or the toplevel VI) in 2013 and go to "file... except for the previous version. Selection 2011.

• VI force to open a compiled version of LabVIEW (not the latest version)

  I have a programming computer that has multiple versions of LabVIEW installed.  Once I finish a program, I propose the computer program 'target' (or touch screen) who have installed one version.

  The problem I have is when I run a VI, VI still load the version of LabVIEW that was used last.  When the VI is saved, it compiles to this version and will no longer work on the computer "target".

  It seems that save for a previous version of LabVIEW still does not work (she can relate to moving from Win 7 to Win XP).

  Is there a way to force the VI to open the version of LabVIEW that the VI has been compiled with?

  Metzler says:

  The problem still exists if you do not know the LV version running the computer "target".

  Your goals should not actually be running LabVIEW.  They should run an executable that you generate (preferably with an Installer).  It would then become less of a problem and you have the advantage of not to need LabVIEW licenses for all your target computers (runtime is free to distribute).

• How to install the spectral measures and Modulation for several versions of Labview Toolkits

  
  

  Hello dear,
  This is a known issue. You can read in the readme of the modulation toolkit:

  Two Versions of LabVIEW installed
  The installer supports the installation of the Modulation Toolkit into one
  version of LabVIEW; installation of the tool in several separate
  facilities (e.g. LabVIEW 7.0 and 7.1 installed LabVIEW LabVIEW
  on the same PC or in separate directories) is not supported or recommended.
  A way not supported to do but involves manually copying files from
  one LabVIEW installation to another. To do this, you can install the
  Modulation Toolkit to the base of a LabVIEW installation directory, and
  then manually copy the files installed in the other installation of LabVIEW.
  The following list includes files and relevant directories. Copy all the files
  These directories, including subdirectories, using the equivalent
  paths related to the House LabVIEW directory for the target.

  \vi.lib\AddOns\Modulation\*.*
  \vi.lib\AddOns\NISML\*.*
  \examples\Modulation\*.*
  \resource\objmgr\NIMTAttribs.RC
  \resource\objmgr\NIMTAttribs.RCH
  \help\lvmod.txt
  \help\lvmod.chm
  \help\lvdmt.txt
  \help\lvdmt.chm

  Note that this list does not include installed files. Also, copy
  the files in this way is not equivalent to a complete installation in the
  another version of LabVIEW. Especially own error text to the
  Modulation Toolkit will not be updated and the example Finder ads will be
  the examples of Modulation Toolkit.

  Jerome

  "CherieC" wrote in message news:
  [email protected]...
  > I installed NOR-RFSG, NOR-DAMA, the Spectral Measurements Toolkit, as well as the
  > Modulation Toolkit.  I have two LabVIEW 7.1 and 8.0 installed on my
  > system.  I developed an application in BT 8.0 and now I need to come back
  > to LV 7.1.  The problem I have is that the add-on toolkits appear to
  > only have been installed for LV 8.0 because there are several missing screws
  > and control when I try to open the LV 7.1 version.  I tried
  > re - install tool boxes, but this is not solved the problem.  How
  > can I get the installation program to install the toolboxes for two versions of
  > LabVIEW?
  >
  > Thanks for your help,.
  > Honey