SL 510 and 8 GB of RAM

Hello

I installed a 4 GB RAM stick (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820233178) into the lower slot and it works fine, but when I install the second identical RAM stick in the top slot, portable CRIES 4 times.

I have a problem with the motherboard, or are there other possibilities?

You have original ram or RAM less than 4 gigs to try the second slot?

Tags: ThinkPad Notebooks

Similar Questions

  • Reset is very slow to a Mac Mini server (mid 2011) what I'm doing. 2 GHz Intel Core i7 processors and 4 GB of RAM

    Reboot and everythingis very slow a Mac mini Server (mid 2011) what I'm doing. 2 GHz Intel Core i7 processors and 4 GB of RAM. Using OS X El Capitan

    What do you mean by slow?

    When slowing down

    Run and view the results here so that we know more about your configuration.

    http://etrecheck.com/

    EtreCheck

  • Tecra M10 - 10F and 8 GB of RAM

    Hello NG,.

    Today, I bought a Toshiba Tecra M10-10th with RAM 2 x 4 GB modules. When I enter the BIOS - it shows 8 GB of RAM. I installed Windows Server 2008 Enterprise 64-bit and after installation of the tab system properties shows 8 GB of RAM, but the Task Manager and all other parameters (for example the pagefile is also only 4 GB in size) said I have only 4 GB of RAM.
    I installed all the drivers and actual patches from the homepage Toshiba - Device Manager displays a device as it is not installed or is unknown.

    What's wrong? Something else has the same experience? Opportunities to work with 8 GB of RAM on Windows Server 2008 64 bit?

    Thanks in advance

    Regards Marc Grote

    Hello

    AFAIK Vista 64bits acknowledged the full RAM after the installation of SP1.
    I put t know how it works on Windows Server 2008, but perhaps you will need also this MS.

    By the way; Maybe the Manager of tasks no indication that the value of RAM that is used and not the total RAM that is inserted

    However try to install a tool like Everest Home edition of analysis of material and check if what RAM value has been reported.

  • Re: Satellite A200 - 1 M 4 and 4 GB of RAM

    Hi all

    I want to ask you about memory.

    I installed two (2 x OCZ2MV6672G OCZ 2 GB SO-DIMM DDR2 PC2-5400) memory modules and the system does not start. When I installed a memory module specification works perfectly. I have the latest version of the BIOS for Windows Vista 32 bit (1.80).

    Œuvres of memory because I changed position and with 2 GB RAM it s all ok but if I installed the second computer module does not start. Thank you for the responses.

    Well, I'm sure, that the maximum amount of RAM is limited to 2 GB. This should be found in the manuals too.
    What modules were built in when you bought it?

    I'm sorry to say, but maybe you can sell your ram remaining on good terms.
    Nevertheless, the OCZ memory has been a good choice.

  • Hello. I use mac to make presentations keynote and photographs of edition. I am currently using Macbook air 128 GB and 4 GB of RAM.  But I find a little slow now. Planing to buy a new. Which one should I buy for my needs?

    Hello. I use mac to make presentations keynote and photographs of edition. I am currently using 11 "Macbook air 128 GB and 4 GB of RAM running on the latest ios.  But I find it very slow now, especially my keynotes. Planing to buy a new. Which one should I buy for my needs?

    Before you buy a new Mac, as a test, save your user files, erase the hard drive, install Mac OS X and then install only your most used applications. It should work like new.

    Any model of Mac bought today, will run Keynote, and Photo editing with ease.

  • 4 and 8 GB of ram in 2015 iMac

    I have an end 2015 27 "iMac, retina 5K with fusion of 1 TB drive. The standard ram is 2 x 4 GB.

    I want to upgrade the ram with 2 x 8 GB while I have 2 x 4 GB and 2 x 8 GB - all slots filled total 24GO.

    Is this possible? the iMac will not accept 4 and 8 GB of ram?

    I bought the iMac in a Premium reseller store, one of the sales people said that if I install more ram than the fusion 24GO drive then the drive of fusion will not work. Is this true?

    Thanks for your help.

    It should work fine. Just be sure that you buy your Crucial RAM or other World Computing. Macs are notoriously picky about RAM.

    The Max according to Apple's 32 GB. With the kit of law of one of the above, it can actually accommodate 64 GB.

    I bought the iMac in a Premium reseller store, one of the sales people said that if I install more ram than the fusion 24GO drive then the drive of fusion will not work. Is this true?

    I'm sure that someone rings if they are aware of it, but that sounds like pure bunk to me. Never heard of the front.

  • Pavilion 550qe Desktop: is the extensible desktop Pavilion 550qe computer of SSD HARD drive and also increased the RAM?

    I buy the HP Pavilion 550qe desktop computer, and it will come with a 1 to HARD drive and 8 GB of ram.   I'll be able to open and pass at the disk for one SSD... and also, can I replace the 8 GB of RAM for 16 GB?   Is RAM welded in, or is it replaceable?  I heard that HP is very difficult to spend at home, this is true even with desktop computers?

    You are welcome!

    Yes, you can upgrade the memory.  There are two locations of memory on the motherboard.  This is the page for Specifications of the motherboard of the computer.

    Please click on the Thumbs up button '+' if I helped you and click on "Accept as Solution" If your problem is resolved.

  • Made AcerAspireV5-473 - Corei3-4010U have an mSata port? And what kind of RAM you recommend to update

    Does Acer Aspire V5 - 473 - Core i3 - 4010U, 4 GB of RAM bus 1600 Mhz equipped of an mSata port to add a SSD? And what type of RAM do you recommend to update?

    Hello

    I finally found the information! I don't speak Vietnamese...

    1 - mSata port:

    Your laptop has exactly the same motherboard for this model:

    NX. MBQED.006 -Aspire-V7-582P-34018G52tkk with a small SDS (20 GB), then your laptop have an mSata port.

    Your motherboard:

    NB. MB711.001BD OF THE HAND. UMA. I3-4010U

    2-memory (Windows 8 64-bit):

    It supports up to 12 GB (4 GB soldered on board + 1x8Gb).

    -Compatible memory: Kingston

    -This is the original memory sticks:

  • How do you determine the type and speed of your RAM installed what?

    * Original title: laptop RAM

    How to determine what type and speed of your RAM installed is.

    Gift little Handy dandy named Speccy.

    http://www.Piriform.com/Speccy

    Once completed its display, click on memory

  • I have Photoshop CS6 and Lightroom 5.7. They are currently installed on a PC with Windows 8.1 Professional 32-bit and 4 GB of RAM. I want to move to a PC with Windows 8.1 Professional 64 bit and 32 GB of memory, because I have a problem with the large

    I have Photoshop CS6 and Lightroom 5.7. They are currently installed on a PC with Windows 8.1 Professional 32-bit and 4 GB of RAM. I want to move to a PC with Windows 8.1 Professional 64 bit and 32 GB of memory, because I have a problem with the large RAW from a Canon 5 Ds R. What should I do?

    You install exactly in the same way you did the 1st time... Put your disc in the drive, and enter your serial number when asked

    Download & install instructions https://forums.adobe.com/thread/2003339 can help

    -includes a link to access a page to download the Adobe programs if you do not have a disk or drive

    Also go to https://forums.adobe.com/community/creative_cloud/creative_cloud_faq

  • When you use the brush in the development module and I have a lot less brushes to create an image, the program hangs up to what I sometimes have to use windows to complete the task.  I have ICC Intel i7 3.4 and 16 GB of RAM to operate Windows 7.  Why hang

    When you use the brush in the development module and I have a lot less brushes to create an image, the program hangs up to what I sometimes have to use windows to complete the task.  I have ICC Intel i7 3.4 and 16 GB of RAM to operate Windows 7.  Why hang up LR

    Doing a lot of brushing up on an image using Lightroom is known to have this problem. The first thing to try is to turn off the graphics acceleration (go to Preferences/Performance tab and then uncheck the box here). IF this does not help, then you can consider doing your brush in Photoshop Elements or Photoshop, instead of brushing in Lightroom.

  • Hi can you please tell me if I can run Adobe Photoshop CC as presentation with a system running Windows with I3 and 4 GB of ram

    I have three computers running Windows 7 with I3 processor minimum and 3to5 GB of ram. It will support with Adobe Photoshop CC success based on package for individuals. What I believe Kiss progs bridge Raw and Lightroom.

    MINIMUM requirements for programs of cloud... scroll down and check out the program you want to use

    -http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/system-requirements.html

    Cloud license allows 2 activations http://www.adobe.com/legal/licenses-terms.html

    -Install on a 2nd computer http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1452292?tstart=0

    -Windows or Mac has no importance... 2 on the same operating system or 1 on each

    -Two activations may NOT be used at the same time (noted in the link above of the license)

    Special plan photography includes Photoshop & Lightroom and Bridge & Mobile Lightroom

    -Special photography Plan includes 2 gigabytes of storage cloud (not the 20Gig of the comprehensive plan)

  • CQ61-319WM and AC twin memory RAM speed

    I bought the CQ61-319WM with / 3 GB or RAM.  The provided configuration is a badly matched set of a 1 GB SODIMM (A-Data) and a 2 GB SODIMM (Samsung).  According to CPU - Z 1.54, both pieces is 400 MHz (DDR2 - 800 MHz), latency CASE 6-6-6-18-24 and according to Memtest86 + 4.00, the result is speed of the RAM of 3481 MB/s using 64-bit transfers (single channel access).

    Upgrading to a configuration usually total memory dual channel results in a good Speed up, I decided to replace the 1 GB SODIMM with another 2 GB.

    I had a piece of 2 GB to another previous project, but it was a version special high speed with latency CASE of 5-5-5-18-23.  I decided that a pair of them so completely taken over would be the best that I could reach, so I bought a second piece (about 80 $ CAN) and put them in.  I've also upgraded the BIOS F.13 (and my Memtest86 + 4.10).

    The result is better, but not as good as it could be.  Reports of CPU - Z full CASE 5-5-5-18 is used and I think it's saying that the dual channel is active (or he's saying that the RAM can support double channel - I am not sure).

    Memtest 86 + (4.00 and 4.10 versions) indicate that the CASE has indeed changed to 5-5-5-18, but that access is still 64-bit (single channel) and the speed of RAM increased to 3614 MB/s.

    3614 MB/s is faster than 3481 MB/s, it is not as fast as I expect 5-5-5-18-23 memory to be if it is currently running dual channel (128-bit access).

    I believe that the BIOS has probably decided to stay "single channel" because the RAM is in a configuration that was unexpected (because the latency CASE is too fast).  However, this probably means that if I buy another piece of 'standard' 800 MHz DDR2 (CASE 6-6-6-18-24) and install it with the original Samsung RAM, it will probably run at full dual channel (128-bit).  Such a configuration should be faster than what I'm running now, despite the fact that the RAM by piece real speed is slower.

    Anyone used this RAM (2 x (2 GB, 800 MHz, CL6)) the installation program?  Can anyone confirm that the result is a configuration complete dual channel?  I can buy the RAM, but if she does not run dual channel, so it's just a waste of money.

    Note: It would certainly NOT let fall to the bottom as for two-channel to 667 MHz.  Such a decline would result in approximately 2600 MB/s even double channel speeds up access.

    I heard generally good.  Curiosity prevailed, and I bought one more piece of RAM.  This piece has been another 2 GB DDR2 800 MHz SODIMM, but this time with the same latency than the original equipment numbers (CASE 6-6-6-18-24).  I installed it with the original Samsung CQ61-319WM and speed of memory that result was exactly the same as the pair (CASE 5-5-5-18-23) faster RAM.  The computer has finished 3-pass of Memtest86 + 4.10 as the fastest pair of RAM, confirming also the speed.

    This tells me that the speed increase had nothing to do with issues of latency, and she had to come from the increase in speed of access memory (128-bit) 'Dual Channel '.

    As to why Memtest86 + 4.10 is reported as "single channel", I feel that the answer may have to do with the RAM 'Side Port' CQ61 graphics system.  According to published specifications, this computer has 128 MB GDDR2 (and memory).  It does not say how this memory is configured.  If it is the only channel (128-bit), then it could be that Memtest86 + sees.

    To confirm this, I took the pair of quick latency RAM and put it in another computer that uses an older AMD 690 chipsets, and the same pair of RAM ran in dual channel mode on the other computer, but at a lower speed of 667 MHz.  Therefore, it seems that AMD memory controllers have probably no problem with this pair of RAM running in dual channel in general.

    While nothing that I've done is quite conclusive, indicates that this computer was probably working with access memory dual channel for two configurations of 4 GB RAM I used.

    In any case, I'll leave the slower RAM in the computer because whenever I change my configuration of memory, I have to lose more than 3 hours running Memtest86 + to check it's OK.  If I did not need to get an acceleration, I will use the faster RAM later in something else.

    There might be a reason to use the best of the RAM (which is probably more recent technology and probably using a little less power), but I don't want to spend more time on this issue.

  • After making Effects CS5 with 48 cores and 96 GB of RAM

    My company is trying to set up some new machines for our render farm. Currently, we see a system with 4 12-core CPU and 96 GB of RAM. Theoretically, this would mean that After Effects would make 48 images at the same time, but I've never heard of someone AE running on this number of cores. Someone saw on whether or not it would work well?


    TYAN S8812WGM3NR Quad Socket Motherboard, G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 4 GB 240 pin DDR3 1333 (x 24), processor AMD Opteron 6172 Magny - course 2.1 GHz 12-Core (x 4), Adobe Creative Suite 5

    Here's what one of the After Effects testers said when I showed him this thread:

    «Works on 8 background process does not show a substantial gain based on tests on [our beastly machine].» In some cases, it was a little slower with > 8 background processor for simultaneous rendering of several images of multiprocessing. Given the size of small size that they are rendered and the degradation of performance running too many carrots, I think that their proposal would be overkill, unless they also use other memory-hungry apps on it.

    I think that they would get for their dollar better performance with a basic machine 24 or 32 GB 8-12, definition of the background processor to 3 GB allowance. Spend the extra bucks on processor speed + speed of the bus with fast disks.

  • Why don't F'fox can not download last Version saying I need OS5 or 6 & say my Op.System supports not later when I have OSX 10.5.8 and a lot of RAM/HD space?

    As stated above:
    When I launch Ff I get the link to download the latest Version (? 4) I get page say:
    -Unfortunately, the latest version of Firefox is not compatible with the operating system of your computer.
    When I click on "learn more" I get:
    -Mac
    Operating systems

       * Mac OS X 10.5
       * Mac OS X 10.6
    

    Recommended hardware

       * Macintosh computer with an Intel x86 processor
       * 512 MB of RAM
       * 200 MB hard drive space
    

    -J' I OSX10.5.8, I have 1.8 GHz PowerPC G5 processor, 1 GB of RAM DDR SD...
    What happens if you please - HELP?

    You have a PPC processor, not an Intel x 86 processor.

    Firefox 3.6.x is the last available from Mozilla for PPC Macs.

    http://www.Mozilla.com/en-us/Firefox/all-older.html

    For older Macs that are not considered supported in versions of Firefox 4 +, try TenFourFox for PowerPC in performance Mac 10.4.11 and 10.5.8.

    http://www.floodgap.com/software/tenfourfox/

    http://tenfourfox.blogspot.com/

    https://code.Google.com/p/tenfourfox/wiki/PluginsNoLongerSupported

    http://code.Google.com/p/tenfourfox/wiki/AAATheFAQ

Maybe you are looking for