SPA232D supply GET authentication

Similar Questions

• Only specific groups should get authenticated on ISE instead of the entire announcement

  Hello friends,

  I have integrated ISE to RFA, but all users of the AD are get authenticated against my network devices and get landed in exec mode, if these users have privileges to perform the configuration, network admins are able to do it because I defined the names of groups admin in the authorization policy, now I want to set only the names of specific groups in the authentication instead of the name of ads policy is it possible to do?

  Thanks in advance.

  Best regards / Tash

  This does not work, have you added the groups you wan't to check for membership in the menu external identity Sources / Active Directory/AD-name/groups? Those that you add, you should see when you press on the + sign next to 'if' and select the name you gave your definition of external advertising.

• Using PEAP get "authentication failed" in the event log

  I'm trying to set up a server RADIUS and PEAP on a CISCO ARI-AP1242AG-A-K9 and I get an authentication failure message in the event log.

  First of all, I see 10.209.128.61:1645, 1646 RADIUS server does not respond.

  Then I see 10.209.128.61:1645, 1646 RADIUS server is back.

  Then, I get the message "failure of authentication station.

  The association tab shows the status of the client as 'treatment of the association.

  Customers are a Flint MX-560 and a windows XP SP2 laptop HP with a intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network card internal.

  I was able to get the Flint to work using JUMP, but no luck at all either with the PEAP Protocol.

  Can someone help me?

  Thank you!

  PEAP allows to authenticate wireless users without requiring that they have USER certificates, but we still need a ROOT certificate.

  Here are some more specific details on PEAP:

  ... 'the protected '.

  Extensible Authentication Protocol (PEAP) Version 2, which provides

  a tunnel encrypted and authenticated, based on the transport layer

  Security (TLS) that encapsulates the EAP authentication mechanisms.

  PEAPv2 uses TLS security to protect against rogue authenticators, to protect

  against various attacks on confidentiality and the integrity of the method internal EAP Exchange and provide the EAP peer for the protection of privacy. »

  "In negotiating TLS, the server presents a certificate of.

  the peer. The peer MUST verify the validity of the EAP server

  certificate and SHOULD also consider the name of the EAP server presented in

  the certificate to determine if the EAP server can be

  of trust. »

  http://Tools.ietf.org/ID/draft-josefsson-PPPEXT-EAP-TLS-EAP-10.txt

  •PEAP uses the side authentication server of digital certification PKI public key Infrastructure-based.

  •PEAP uses TLS to encrypt all sensitive user authentication information.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/wireless/technology/PEAP/technical/reference/PEAP_D.html#wp998638

• Get "authentication error" for a device that is not in the OME

  Hello

  I'm really stuck here. We have over 15,000 "authentication failure" for a device that is not listed in the section "devices." That's why I'm unable to remove this device. The alert is displayed with the ip address that points to a live device (Equallogic member).

  Here's what I've done so far:

  When I try to "ignore this device only" I get an error saying that there is no mechanism for this alert. When we look at the device ID in the database table is displayed as -1

  The goal is to have the reporting of Equallogic in OME and when I add the Group and the Member (which is using this ip address) the device adds ok. But the Alerts continue to occur (showing the correct DNS name this time).

  I then removed the discovery range devices but alerts keep coming (with ip address).

  So for me, it looks like this device got stuck somewhere in the OME and is accessible, although there is no device. But I don't see it came from. These alerts are just a pain and I need to find a way to get rid of it.

  Please is - can anyone enlighten us in this strange behavior. We are on OME 1.2.0.3441

  Thank you

  Thorsten

  Hi Thorsten,

  Well I can confuse or missing some subtle detail here.

  When it comes to SNMP alerts, OME don't communicate with the target, the target device sends an alert to OME.  So if OME Gets a rogue alert in the alert/event console, this is because the device is pointing to the OME IP for sending traps.

  You looked at the target device SNMP parameters itself?

  THX

  Rob

  (Sorry if I'm being dense and not your question)

• Any user can get authenticated ACS SE 4.1

  Hi all

  I'm having a devil of a time to get a new 4.1 SE ACS configured in a new network. I have a 3560 now that I first try but I can't authenicated. I have the user/group account set up, the group is correspondence in my AAA statements although I saw some errors on the Group has not been configured. I even created two different groups and tried different names, but again, no luck. I'm just using the internal PB, nothing special. I read the administration guide, but it has not helped. When I turn on debugging, I don't see a lot of activity, only on the group to be wrong, but I don't understand how that's possible. I'm short on time, I would really appreciate the help. Thanks in advance!

  When we EXEC permission, give the ACS/authorization server exec privileges the user for example.

  Under users/settings group looking for check "Shell (exec)" this. This should allow you to. If you want you must also get certain privileges directly that you log, and then also check 'privilège level' and type the value in the box, 0-15.

  I recommend referring to,.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps2086/products_configuration_example09186a00808d9138.shtml

  If this is your first configuration of authorization.

  Kind regards

  Prem

  Please rate if this can help!

• HP Officejet Pro 8600 N911n required authentication

  I entered a business and the person who was a dependant of the printer has left.  I need to set up my email on the device so that I can scan documents to my email.

  I filled out all the information and it rpet authentication required, but it does not say how to get authentication.

  Help!

  Hello

  Thank you for using the forum.

  From your description, it seems that the it guy who has left your company has installed an administrator password.

  You will need to get this information before you can set up e-mail on the device.

  Hope that helps.

  Please click on the "Bravo Thumbs up" If this has helped you and 'Accept as solution' If this helped solved your problem.

• The authentication of the client at the edge of Collaboration / MRA

  Hello

  Could someone help with the following question?

  When a Jabber client to get authenticated?

  My understanding is that when a Jabber Internet device accesses (to connect) the highway-E, only the server (Expressway-E) is authenticated (using the public certification authority in the operative part of Jabber).

  Is this correct? If so, the user of the device Jabber/get authenticated when the device attempts to save with the CUCM?

  Thanks in advance,

  / Bertin

  Dimension Data.

  In the case of deployment of Jabber/CUCM/Highway, during the initial connection between the Jabber client and server side of the highway, there is an exchange of key/cert/handshake that creates a secure between communication channel. At this point customer Jabber solidly passes the credentials to the edge of the highway and happening at the Expressway kernel, the kernel then provides the credentials to the server CUCM (that defies in turn compared to its local user database authentication or LDAP, if it is in use) then returns a message authenticated core Expressway , which sends it to the side of the highway, which tells in turn the Jabber client, it has successfully authenticated.

  This leaves out some deeper technical details, but does that answer your question?

  Also, above statements may be different for a deployment of VCS (not Expressway series) as there are has several authentication options. It would also be about endpoint and video Jabber for TelePresence and not 'normal' Jabber points.

• Authorization vs. authentication?

  I have a concentrator 3005 and am currently Authenticating users (using the Cisco VPN client software) vs MS Active Directory on Server 2003. However, authentication is not whether the user has obtained the rights to remote access. This means that anyone with an active account in AD gets authenticated and therefore obtained access remotely, even when not granted this right explicitly in AD. How can I get granular control so I can stop an individual user for authentication and so remote access? -What does mean an authorization server? I have to configure my AD server for LDAP queries for authorization as performing authentication?

  Authorization authorizes specific orders by user.

  What you are looking for is RAUDIUS authentication via an IAS server. IAS by default requires the user to have remote access enabled prior to authentication.

  Install IAS, the 3005 to use the IAS server for authentication of the configuration, and you should be good to go.

• SSL VPN authentication using the ad group

  Hi all

  I tried to restrict users to authenticate to the SSL VPN using an ad server. I have install the AAA server with the IP address of the AD server and attributed to the connection profile as well; However, I see that any user who is a member of a group in AD is able to authenticate.

  I want to only users who belong to the group "VPN users" get authenticated while everyone and all those who have credentials of the AD and not even a part of the 'VPN users' group is making authenticated.

  Can someone advice how I can make the ASA authenticate users based on ad groups? I use the ASDM to configure my VPN RA.

  Thanks in advance!

  Kind regards

  Riou

  Hey riri,.

  Try to use DAP to restrict access to users who belong to a specific ad group:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/7691/ASA-8X-dynamic-access-poli...

  Use the AAA attribute "LDAP .member of" to allow access to the users belonging to a specific group and deny access to other users.

  concerning

  Eric

• Using Windows Anytime Upgrade Key to get real

  Hi all

  I received a message telling me that my copy of Windows 7 Edition Family Premium is not authentic (should never have trusted my ex-friend now).  I've done the validation control and I have a legal copy of Home Premium for $109, said the Microsoft Web site.  However, I was wondering if I can use a Windows 7 Anytime Upgrade not only put to upgrade to Ultimate, but to me as well legal.  Did someone knows if I get a converted copy of an upgrade to Windows 7 will be get me real, it will just upgrade me to ultimate and still get authentic, or it won't work at all?  Please let me know!  Thank you!

  The base license, in this case must first be validated until you can do an Express Windows 7 Ultimate upgrade or just pointed out that its true not too and ask you to upgrade to a version full.

  Get the Windows 7 Home Premium license validated. You can do it by phone:

  Activate Windows 7 manually:
  1. click on start and in the search for box type: slui.exe 4

  2. press enter on your keyboard

  3. Select your country.
  4. Select the telephone activation option and brace yourself for a real person.

  If this isn't a genuine license, you can get one at the shop from Microsoft for Windows 7 Home Premium and update the product key:

  http://store.Microsoft.com/Microsoft/Windows-Windows-7/category/102

  You do not have we given a lot of details to work at though.

  Is the license of Windows 7 Home Premium installed now a version upgrade or full? Was it a license borrowed friends? If it's a borrowed license, then you can buy a version key full if you do not have a license previously installed/enabled (XP or Vista).

  When you buy the key, you can update the key:

  How to update your product key
  http://www.Microsoft.com/genuine/selfhelp/Win7Pkuinst.aspx?displaylang=en&sGuid=03838351-5d79-4ffc-90c7-973062d2676f

  Releasing it's easy: with Windows | ActiveWin | Laptops | Microsoft MVP

• Failure of GBA 4.2 GANYMEDE + authentic. Incompatibility of keys

  I have configured 10 switches(C3750-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M) of layer 2, Version 12.2 (40) SE), use GANYMEDE +. They are all using the same key and work correctly.  I went to another switch 3750 located through a point-to-point circuit, software C3750 Cisco (C3750-IPBASEK9-M), Version 12.2 (35) SE5. I entered the configuration routine and then entered the key and tried to connect as a user and get authentication failed. I checked the server and see key discrepancies in the reports and activity, the attempt failed.  I've removed the key, copied and pasted from Notepad, still does not work.  Removed the switch in the network device group ACS and then re - he added, stuck a new key, without special characters. No go.

  Here is the config.

  AAA new-model
  !
  !
  AAA of default login authentication group Ganymede + activate
  local NO_AAA AAA authentication login
  the AAA authentication enable default group Ganymede + activate
  AAA authorization exec default group Ganymede + authenticated if

  Ganymede IP source interface FastEthernet0/0

  GANYMEDE-server host 10.1.1.1
  RADIUS-server key 0 itspassword
  RADIUS-server application made

  Initially, the password is encrypted, so I changed it to erase the text by typing the password without the 0 and with 0.  None worked.  Also removed encryption service to see if that would do anything.

  I usually have SSH for router, so I changed it to accept telent.  That did not work.  Changed SSH, reset the rsa keys and modified so that it uses SSH2, which did not work.

  Here's what I get from newspapers

  August 12 at 11:43:24: TAC +: send worm package AUTHENTIC/START = 192 id = 97563278
  August 12 at 11:43:24: TAC +: using Ganymede server-group "Ganymede +" list by default.
  August 12 at 11:43:24: TAC +: opening TCP/IP 10.1.1.1/49 Timeout = 5
  August 12 at 11:43:24: TAC +: handle opened TCP/IP 0x3663CA0 to 10.219.1.1/49 using the 10.2.2.254 source
  August 12 at 11:43:24: TAC +: 10.1.1.1 (97563278) AUTHENTIC/START/CONNECTION/ASCII queued
  August 12 at 11:43:25: TAC +: (97563278) AUTHENTIC/START/CONNECTION/ASCII processed
  August 12 at 11:43:25: TAC +: received bad AUTHENTIC package: length = 6, should 80467
  August 12 at 11:43:25: TAC +: invalid package AUTHENTIC/START/CONNECTION/ASCII (control keys).
  August 12 at 11:43:25: TAC +: connection TCP/IP closing 0x3663CA0 to 10.1.1.1/49
  August 12 at 11:43:25: TAC +: using Ganymede server-group "Ganymede +" list by default.
  August 12 at 11:43:37: TAC +: send worm package AUTHENTIC/START = 192 id = 1015854339
  August 12 at 11:43:37: TAC +: using Ganymede server-group "Ganymede +" list by default.
  August 12 at 11:43:37: TAC +: opening TCP/IP 10.1.1.1/49 Timeout = 5
  August 12 at 11:43:37: TAC +: handle opened TCP/IP 0x366AF24 to 10.1.1.1/49 using the 10.2.2.254 source
  August 12 at 11:43:37: TAC +: 10.1.1.1 (1015854339) AUTHENTIC/START/CONNECTION/ASCII queued
  August 12 at 11:43:38: TAC +: (1015854339) AUTHENTIC/START/CONNECTION/ASCII processed
  August 12 at 11:43:38: TAC +: received bad AUTHENTIC package: length = 6, should 79092
  August 12 at 11:43:38: TAC +: invalid package AUTHENTIC/START/CONNECTION/ASCII (control keys).
  August 12 at 11:43:38: TAC +: connection TCP/IP closing 0x366AF24 to 10.1.1.1/49
  August 12 at 11:43:38: TAC +: using Ganymede server-group "Ganymede +" list by default.

  I watched autour forum for about 4 hours, try all other options that were given to other people with a similar problem.  The last key, in that I put has 123456.  You can not fat finger that is.  Switch journal said check the key, the firewall is configured to allow all traffic from the AAA client.

  Hi green2003 mg,.

  The substitution of key group (the NDG where your switch belongs to) the button. Have you checked that one?

  Greetz,

  Julia

• Cisco Secure ACS groups 5.1 Active Directory and RSA Authentication Manager 7.1 for profiles

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name: "Table Normal" "; mso-knew-rowband-size: 0; mso-knew-colband-size: 0; mso-style - noshow:yes; mso-style-priority: 99; mso-style - qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:" ";" mso-padding-alt: 0 cm 0 cm 5.4pt 5.4pt; mso-para-margin: 0 cm; mso-para-margin-bottom: .0001pt; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; font-size: 11.0pt; font family: 'Calibri', 'sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-make: minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-make: minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-make: minor-latin ;}"}

  Hello

  I'm deploying an ACS connected to an RSA AuthManager (that is connected to an Active Directory domain)

  I create several groups within the Active Directory server, I try to give to users for their groups different access rights.

  I tried to define an access policy "NetOp/NetAdm" and two authorization rules:

  Rule-1 AD - AD1:ExternalGroups contains all dir. INTRA/groups/NETOP 'Auth for net operators' 0

  Rule 2 AD - AD1:ExternalGroups contains all dir. INTRA/groups/NETADM 'Auth net admin' 0

  Default: refuse

  In the identity, I have configured the RSA identity source, so that users get authenticated by the RSA Authentication Manager.

  But I still refuse to get access, RSA authentication is successful, but the group membership, active directory does not work, even with the unix attributes or group principal defined for the user.

  My question is this valid configuration scenario? Is there another way to define several profiles according to the Group of users of external source?

  The stages of monitoring:

  Measures

  Request for access received RADIUS 11001

  11017 RADIUS creates a new session

  Assess Service selection strategy

  15004 Matched rule

  Access to Selected 15012 - NetOp/NetAdm service policy

  Evaluate the politics of identity

  15004 Matched rule

  15013 selected identity Store - server RSA

  24500 Authenticating user on the server's RSA SecurID.

  24501 a session is established with the server's RSA SecurID.

  24506 check successful operation code

  24505 user authentication succeeded.

  24553 user record has been cached

  24502 with RSA SecurID Server session is closed

  Authentication 22037 spent

  22023 proceed to the recovery of the attribute

  24628 user cache not enabled in the configuration of the RADIUS identity token store.

  Identity sequence 22016 completed an iteration of the IDStores

  Evaluate the strategy of group mapping

  15006 set default mapping rule

  Authorization of emergency policy assessment

  15042 no rule has been balanced

  Evaluation of authorization policy

  15006 set default mapping rule

  15016 selected the authorization - DenyAccess profile

  15039 selected authorization profile is DenyAccess

  11003 returned RADIUS Access-Reject

  Thank you

  Christophe

  I think you need to do is to create a sequence of identity with RSA as a selection in

  Authentication and recovery research list of attributes and AD in the additional attribute list recovery research. Then select this sequence as a result of the politics of identity for the service

• I get an error, 'relationship between the workstation and the field has no confidence. "

  I have a 2003 domain controller, this a job gives me an error "trust in relationship between the workstation and the domain failed" so I read I have to reset the server, remove the object and remove the workstation from the domain, but my problem is that I can not even log in as administrator to do. My admin login details work perfect on other machines, but not this one. Help, please!

  On computers that are connected to a domain, you always have the choice to get authenticated by the controller of domain or the local computer. You must select the local computer, and then use a local administrator account.

• AAA authentication sequence

  We have following commands configured on the 2950

  AAA new-model

  AAA authentication login default local radius group

  the AAA authentication enable default

  RADIUS group AAA authorization exec default authenticated if

  localuser username secret 5 *.

  When you try to access the switch it's mark to the RADIUS server, but it is not authenticated.

  And then he gets authenticated with the local user name.

  Here is the log of the RADIUS server

  It shows the correct user name and correct the source of the switch IP address.

  Authentication provider = Windows

  Authentication server =

  Policy-Name =

  Authentication type PAP =

  EAP-Type =

  Code motif = 16

  Reason = authentication was not successful because an unknown user or bad password name has been used.

  In principle it was expected that as long as the switch is able to connect to the RADIUS server, it will not use the local username for authentication.

  But the switch uses the local username even if he can contact the RADIUS service.

  Please share the experience.

  Thank you

  Subodh

  Hello

  Indeed, I've recreated the issue when authenticating against a RAQ. My switch is running a newer version, however, it always reports the error of decryption on newspapers when the shared secret is incorrect. Shared secret configured as "cisco" on the switch and as "cisco123" relating to the registration of the IAS RADIUS client. Got the following text:

  Priv15 of the user has been denied access.

  Fully-qualified-user name = CAMEJIA\priv15

  NAS-IP-Address = x.x.250.12

  NAS-identify =

  Station called = identifier

  Calling-Station-identifier =

  Client-Friendly-Name = x.x.250.12

  Client-IP-Address = x.x.250.12

  NAS-Port-Type = Async

  NAS-Port =

  Proxy-policy-Name = use Windows authentication for all users

  Authentication provider = Windows

  Authentication server =

  Policy-Name =

  Authentication type PAP =

  EAP-Type =

  Code motif = 16

  Reason = authentication was not successful because an unknown user or bad password name has been used.

  On the debugging switch:

  * 06:02:13.600 Mar 2: RADIUS: receipt id 1645/6 x.x.250.20:1645, Access-Reject, len 20

  * 06:02:13.600 Mar 2: RADIUS: 24 84 60 FA B8 43 3rd A9 authenticator - AC 55 72 70 CE 34 BA 70

  * 06:02:13.600 Mar 2: RADIUS: authenticator response decrypt fault, len 20 pak

  * 06:02:13.600 Mar 2: RADIUS: package dump: 03060014248460FAB8433EA9AC557270CE34BA70

  * 06:02:13.600 Mar 2: RADIUS: digest expected: D22363698E8862015AC91213B540D77C

  * 06:02:13.600 Mar 2: RADIUS: authentic response: 248460FAB8433EA9AC557270CE34BA70

  * 06:02:13.600 Mar 2: RADIUS: ask authentic: 32B4A229A7EB982A61EB31E29A24AA47

  * 06:02:13.600 Mar 2: RADIUS: response (6) could not decipher

  Please, create a new RADIUS client for the switch only and use a single key as "cisco" on both sides. Do not forget that we should not hit the space bar when you configure the key on the IOS since it will space as a valid shared key figure.

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards.

• HTTP authentication

  I'm trying to get authentication for HTTP to use radius AAA and seem to have problems with the privilege level. It works very well with the SSH connection, but does not work with the web management. The model is a WS-CBS3130X-S-F 12.2 (58) SE1 running with version 1.001.002 http...

  Config is:

  AAA new-model

  AAA authentication login VTYSandHTTP local radius group

  AAA authorization exec VTYSandHTTP group local RADIUS

  IP http server

  IP http authentication aaa-authentication of connection VTYSandHTTP

  IP http authentication aaa exec-authorization VTYSandHTTP

  IP http secure server

  RADIUS server

  auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646 ipv4 address

  key

  line vty 0 4

  exec authorization VTYSandHTTP

  authentication of the connection VTYSandHTTP

  entry ssh transport

  line vty 5 15

  exec authorization VTYSandHTTP

  authentication of the connection VTYSandHTTP

  entry ssh transport

  
  

  That's what I get when I try to open an HTTP session

  Name from the list of authentication of the connection HTTP AAA: VTYSandHTTP

  Name from the list of authentication of the connection HTTP AAA: VTYSandHTTP

  HTTP: Level 15 authentication failure

  Joseph,

  Your configuration is quite correct. However, you hit a bug on 12.2 (58) SE train,.

  CSCtq55319 http IP as aaa authentication does not work

  reproduced by

  CSCtq94595    HTTP AAA authentication doesn't work anymore after upgrade to 12.2.58S

  To resolve this problem, please update to 15.0 (1) SE1.

  Note: You must also make sure the RADIUS server sends the "shell: priv-lvl = 15 ' cisco-av-pair for this work.

  Kind regards

  Dev