SPA3102 as simple FXO/SIP, no router gateway?

Similar Questions

• Encryption advice please WRT160N router/gateway/modem wireless

  I would like clarification on security and encryption please.

  I have a WRT160N router/gateway/modem wireless with WPA security is enabled.  I have a wired office with LELA installed and a wireless laptop.  A key is required when connecting the laptop but on page properties in LELA, it says "wireless encryption - no ' is this extra encryption in addition to the security theWPA. WH n I try to enable it, LELA asks the password admin but after entering that does nothing (except once again ask!)  What I am doing wrong?

  Thank you

  That your network is already reached, but him dosent software LELA display you something on your safety. This means that the LELA was not able to properly synchronize with the router and its wireless settings. So in this case, you do not have to worry about this, if you want you can uninstall and reinstall the LELA software on your computer, that might solve the problem. Or of another Complitely uninstall LELA software from your computer.

• Problem with RV0042 - mask subnet/router/gateway?

  Hi guys.

  I have a DSL here in Holland. To use my RV042 VPN function, I need the router to get the IP of the DSL modem. No problem, I bought a modem that can define transparant and with dhcp-parody the modem Gets the public ip address (say 85.223.12.34).

  The thing is, I can't access the internet, or in fact any IP that isn't in the first segment of the external IP address. So I can reach 85.123.34.56, but not 86.123.34.56. So I plugged the modem to a computer, set the transparent modem and the computer got the public IP address. And you know, I have a perfect connection, and everything works. Looking at my ip information, download the provider 255.0.0.0 subnet. Im not a Networking Wizard, but it seems to me that the problem lies here. But why is my stand-alone pc able to connect quite normal, but when I connect my linksys RV042 and internal diagnostic test (ping) of the router or a computer behind the router, obtaining an ip address, I don't get anything.

  When I ping manually, I also get the message "network is not available. Ping to an IP on the same subnet (for example, 85.111.111.111) goes perfect.

  I'm obviously missing something here. My colleuge said it could be and router/gateway (currently bridge) or a NAT problem-associated device.

  Please point me in the right direction.

  Intellectual property of addidional information:

  External ip address: 85.223.12.34

  External subnet mask: 255.0.0.0

  External gateway: 217.149.196.82

  External DNS: 217.149.196.6

  Internal IP address: 172.16.0.254

  Internal subnet: 255.255.0.0

  New firmware etc.

  Thank you guys!

  What static routes you add exactly on your RV? It's funny, it works now.

  WIndows seems to accept a gateway address that is not on a connected interface.

  The first line is the rule of default gateway:
  0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 217.149.196.82 85.223.66.38

  The second line just tells you that 85.0.0.0/255.0.0.0 is connected to the ethernet adapter that has the IP 85.223.66.38.
  85.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 85.223.66.38 85.223.66.38

  Technically, the first route should now work. There is still no route for 217.149.196.82 in the routing tables. The only route that matches the destination IP 217.149.196.82 is the first route.

  But I guess that, in your case, that default gateway with 217.149.196.82 is actually connected to the network on the side of the VP, i.e. your ISP WAN runs two IP subnets on the same network. Since this first route runs on Windows, I guess that WIndows simply tries to find the MAC address of the 217.149.196.82 on the WAN using ARP interface (i.e., it assumes that the device with 217.149.196.82 is directly connected to the WAN Ethernet) and if something is used as default gateway. Is not really consistent with the ideal IP routing, but still works...

• SPA3102 Configuration Simple

  Hi all

  I'm a newbie total looking for the easy button. I would like some screenshots or pointers on my SPA3102 configuration. I have a line of POTS and a SIP with Skype account.   I want to configure my SPA3102 to take all incoming pots (so I don't have to change my phone number or use my bandwidth all the time). I want all local calls (code 303 and 720) and, possibly, 911 (if possible) to get out of the line of POTS, but all the long distance to go to SIP on SKYPE account. Pretty simple, but I can't find an Assistant or samples in the documentation or firmware to the SPA3102. Thanks in advance.

  These products are processed by the Cisco Small Business support community. (URL: https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/small-business )

• my router gateway userse is slow and it's always lose connection when I change my location

  How can I disable my gateway uverse router and use my linksys AC9200 instead of the gateway uverse router

  You must contact your ISP to find out if the ISP's modem is flattened. If this isn't the case, then the use of the DMZ on the ISP modem.

  If the ISP's modem has a built-in router, it is best to fill the modem. Having 2 routers on the same line can cause connection problems: link >http://www.practicallynetworked.com/networking/fixing_double_nat.htm and http://computer.howstuffworks.com/nat.htm if the modem cannot be filled then see if the modem has a DMZ option and enter the IP address of the router gets the modem and put it in the DMZ modems. Disable any WiFi modem from the ISP and filters such as firewalls and other. Also check the routers DHCP IP address may be in conflict with the ISP modem 192.168.1.1 IP address. Check to see if it's the same on the ISP's modem and if the modem cannot be filled, replace the 192.168.0.1 Linksys router ou.0.254.

  Preferred method of connecting with a modem of stand-alone ISP:
  ISP modem > Linksys router<>connected devices.

  Method of connecting with a modem with integrated router which can be filled with ISP:
  ISP (bridged) modem > Linksys router<>connected devices.

  Method of connecting with a modem with integrated router which cannot be cured of ISP:
  ISP modem (DMZ) > routers Linksys IP WAN placed in modems ISP DMZ<>WRT router devices.

  DSL PPPoE configuration:
  http://KB.Linksys.com/Linksys/UKP.aspx?pid=80&VW=1&articleid=3687

  Set static IP address:
  http://KB.Linksys.com/Linksys/UKP.aspx?pid=80&VW=1&articleid=3979

  Installation of the cable:
  http://KB.Linksys.com/Linksys/UKP.aspx?pid=80&VW=1&articleid=3686

• How can I connect a cisco router to the internet via a cable modem / router gateway

  I have searched here but can't find the exact answer that I'm looking. I have a switch and a router cisco 1760 2950. The router has an added ethernet wic card so I have two ethernet connections available. I would like to connect the cable modem gateway the router through one of the connections on the router, then the switch ethernet. I can't get this configuration to work. There are several different ways, I saw displayed to accomlish. DHCP, without dhcp, creating a separate network and giving the e0/0 cable an ip address in the range of addresses network gateways. None of this has worked. Can someone after the commands that must be entered on the router to make this possible?

  Hello, I'm assuming that your ISP is to give addresses via DHCP...

  And I suppose also we want to implement our router DHCP in our local network to give our PCs and laptops etc...

  So what we need to do is:

  conf t

  !

  interface e0/0

  Description # INTERNET #.

  IP access-group MY_WAN in

  DHCP IP address

  NAT outside IP

  No tap

  !

  interface e0/1

  # MY LAN description #.

  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

  IP nat inside

  !

  IP access-list standard MY_LAN

  permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  !

  MY_WAN extended IP access list

  allow tcp any a Workbench

  refuse TCP a whole

  allow an ip

  !

  IP nat inside source list MY_LAN interface e0/0 overload

  !

  IP dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.0 192.168.1.99

  !

  dhcp MY_LAN IP pool

  network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0

  default router 192.168.1.1

  Server DNS 8.8.4.4 8.8.8.8

  In this configuration, I applied an ACL for a protection to my router and my network to allow only established connections that Ive from my LAN to return to me. Anyone who tries to open a connection to your router will be refused. Everything is allowed. But you can change this option to be more specific rather than wide.

  On your switch, if you leave all ports in the vlan 1 and have as access ports, it should work.

  Hope this helps

  Please note the useful messages and don't forget to mark resolved all questions answers. Thank you.

• SAI 243 x as SIP <>modem router ISDN with iLBC

  Hi all

  I have a couple of SAI 243 x (specifically IAD2431 and IAD2432) running IOS 15.1 (4) M5 that I use as SIP for ISDN PRI E1 gateways. They are configured with POTS by a dial peer for ISDN and a couple of VoIP dial-peers according to the new number called ISDN. He works very well with G.711 A-law-to-end, but now I'm trying to work with iLBC and having problems.

  My dial-peer configuration looks like this:

  voice POTS dial-peer 1

  Description peer ISDN30

  translation-profile incoming incoming bt

  service logon

  destination-model. T

  alert progress_ind-band 8

  No Strip number

  direct line to inside

  port 1/0:15

  Forward-digits all the

  !

  Dial-peer voice 3 voip

  your reminder alert-non-PI

  Description peer to number of bearer

  huntstop

  service logon

  destination-model 01234567890

  RTP payload type nte your 102

  RTP payload type comfort-noise 13

  session protocol sipv2

  session target ipv4:1.2.3.4:5060

  codec voice-class 1

  numbers-fall of DTMF-relay rtp - nte

  IP qos dscp cs3 signaling

  CLID network provided

  replacement CLID name

  !

  Dial-office of communications telephone voip 65008

  your reminder alert-non-PI

  Description peer for the main range

  huntstop

  service logon

  destination-model 01234567 [1-8].

  RTP payload type nte your 102

  RTP payload type comfort-noise 13

  session protocol sipv2

  session target ipv4:1.2.3.4:5060

  codec voice-class 1

  numbers-fall of DTMF-relay rtp - nte

  IP qos dscp cs3 signaling

  CLID network provided

  replacement CLID name

  Another relevant config:

  voice, send rtp-received

  !

  voice service pots

  keepalive RTCP

  !

  voip phone service

  list of approved IP addresses

  IPv4 1.2.3.4

  keepalive RTCP

  Standard DTMF-interworking

  Fax protocol t38 ls-redundancy version 0 0 hs-redundancy 0 relief pass through g711alaw

  SIP

  udp tcp transport switch

  No anat

  block 183 present sdp

  !

  voice class codec 1

  mode of ilbc codec preference 1 30

  codec preference 2 g729r8

  g711alaw preferably 3 codec

  !

  Now, when I place a call from the ISDN through the gateway, the SDP, he offers to my SBC is:

  v = 0

  o = CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 7963 1810 IN IP4 6,7,8,9

  s = call SIP

  c = IN IP4 6,7,8,9

  t = 0 0

  m = audio RTP/AVP 116 18 8 101 13 18710

  c = IN IP4 6,7,8,9

  a = rtpmap:116 iLBC/8000

  a = fmtp:116 mode = 30

  a G729/8000 rtpmap:18 =

  a = fmtp:18 annex b = No.

  a = rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000

  a rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 =

  a = fmtp:101 0-16

  a = rtpmap:13 CN/8000

  It is very good - both ends of iLBC agreement and the call comes. However, if I make a call on the side SIP through ISDN, I offer you this:

  v = 0

  o =-78207127932020 78207127932020 IN IP4 1.2.3.4

  s = -.

  c = IN IP4 1.2.3.4

  t = 0 0

  m = 24132 audio RTP/AVP 110 8 127

  a = rtpmap:110 iLBC/8000

  a rtpmap:127 telephone-event/8000 =

  a = fmtp:110 mode = 30

  a = silenceSupp: suite.

  a = ptime:20

  Then I'm a 200 OK with that:

  v = 0

  o = CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 9977 8349 IN IP4 6,7,8,9

  s = call SIP

  c = IN IP4 6,7,8,9

  t = 0 0

  m = 17650 audio RTP/AVP 8 127

  c = IN IP4 6,7,8,9

  a = rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000

  a rtpmap:127 telephone-event/8000 =

  a = fmtp:127 0-16

  a = ptime:20

  This means that we use G.711 A - Law. If I've got this remove the offer and propose simply iLBC, the IAD rejects the appeal.

  Clearly, it takes care of calls using G.711 on the ISDN and iLBC side SIP - how to persuade to allow calls made from the side SIP at work and calls made from the side of ISDN?

  Thank you very much in advance for your suggestions!

  Sean

  You should have "incoming called-number." under voip RFP.

• MGCP router/gateway in CUCM update

  I may have been looking in all the wrong ways, but am not finding something that fits

  We have replaced just 10 28XX gateways with bridges 29erxx. They all run MGCP. While they all work in their prior CUCM configuration with the 28XX model shown, I like to keep everything up-to-date.

  Is it possible to make a change to the model of router without the construction of a new and delete the old, or what it is for me?

  No way to change the model, you must recreate them using the new ISR G2 model.

  HTH

  Java

  If it helps, please note

  www.Cisco.com/go/pdihelpdesk

• DNS ROUTING GATEWAY SETTINGS?

  Hello.

  I have ESXi 6.0. 32 GB of ram, SSD, Intel 2 NIC
  One NETWORK adapter for WAN (DHCP static address of my ISP)
  A NETWORK LAN (192.186.0.1) card

  1 virtual machine running the service router, DHCP, DNS, NAT (192.168.0.1) Pfsense static
  1 virtual machine running Web/mail/shared folders (192.168.0.10) Dhcp (mac locked)
  ESXi got the static IP 192.168.0.49

  My Question is on the DNS configuration and routing in ESXi.

  During installation, the default IP for dns and gateway is set to 192.168.0.49, the ESXi host yourself.
  Is this correct?

  Should I configure dns for 8.8.8.8./8.8.4.4 OR 192.168.0.1 OR my ISP dns servers?

  Or Preferred dns 192.168.0.1 and replacement of 192.168.0.49

  Or Preferred dns 8.8.8.8 and replacement of 192.168.0.1

  And default gateway? 192.168.0.1 (on vm) OR 192.168.0.45 OR my ISP default gateway OR my ISP static ip?

  / Brian

  Looking at your Setup program.

  Let your ESXi host management IP address to be 192.168.0.49

  PREFFERED DNS: 192.168.0.1, DNS auxiliary: leave this field blank

  Default gateway: 192.168.0.1

  Now remember, you assign subnet IP, mask, DG, DNS etc to any physical NIC of your ESXi host, you set these parameters VMKernel adapter created in the operating system of ESXi. Your PFsense which is to have two interfaces, one pointing to the public network, where you have configured the ISP associated IP settings, while the other interface that points to the network internal who has private IP settings so ESXi vmkernel adapter must be configured according to private IP parameters.

  See if that helps.

• SIP trunk behind a router using NAT

  Hello

  Is it possible to use a SIP trunk to a provider SIP ITSP having the CUBE / router gateway behind a firewall using a NAT?

  Does anyone do this?

  I ask because I'm having problems to make my SIP trunk to work and my router for cube is behind my generic service provider router, which makes the NAT. I just want to rule this out as a problem.

  Has anyone else done this? Or is it really impossible?

  Thank you very much

  Tom

  Hello

  As NAT works fine SIP would work properly as the Protocol.

  Here is the RFC for "NAT Traversal practices for Client - Server SIP"

  https://Tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6314

  HTH

  JB

• SPA3102 problem: State PSTN: still rings in the State

  We got a new router Linksys SPA3102 VOIP gateway, and we have some problems to operate.

  The SPA3102 is properly connected to the local network, but it seems to have problems with the incoming PSTN line.

  However, it does not sound when I call the number RTC. On the other hand, State PSTN always says 'Ringing '...

  When I restart the SPA3102, then the extension on the pbx sipx she must call rings (without anyone calling the PSTN number).

  The status page says something like:

  Voltage: 14 (V) loop current: 0.0 registration of (my) State: not recorded the last record to: next record in: last call VoIP number: [email protected] last call number RTC: last calling VoIP: last PSTN Caller:, last RTPC Disconnect reason: CPC Signal RTC activity Timer: 30000 (ms) mapped Port SIP: 5061 Type of call: VoIP Gateway call VoIP State: Idle PSTN State : ringer VoIP: tone RTC:

  (Note: the bridge didn't need to register for the sipx-pbx).

  While it fires after a reboot of the SPA3102, nothing happens when I dial my mobile PSTN - I hear only ringing on mobile (it says busy or more).

  Does anyone have advice?

  Andreas

  It did not break. The problem was with the cable to connect to the UK British Telecom. I haven't used the gray wire that came with it, but used a telephone cord UK I had to hang out - bad move.

  When we talk about Linuxemporium, there where I bought the SPA3102, I was made aware that the cable might be the problem. So I went on the road in a small phone shop to get a US - UK adapter (packaged with the SPA3102 is still an American cable), that didn't fix it. I had another well-known adapter from a retailer of Electronics UK, and that one has solved the problem. The SPA3102 fortunately now works as my PSTN gateway.

  I hope this can help others with similar problems.

• two questions of routing VLAN fast

  Let's say that I have spend a routing 4 L3 VLAN

  VLAN 1 192.168.10.0/24, virtual interface of the switch is 192.168.10.254 inside this vlan
  VLAN 2 is 192.168.20.0/24, the virtual interface of the switch is 192.168.20.254 inside this vlan
  VLAN 3 is 192.168.30.0/24, the virtual interface of the switch is 192.168.30.254 inside this vlan
  VLAN 4 192.168.40.0/24, virtual interface of the switch is 192.168.40.254 inside this vlan

  There is that a single router out of this switch at the net, and lets say that it is in VLAN 1 and its address is 192.168.10.1

  first question - inside the L3 switch I need to add a default route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.1

  to ensure that all traffic not matching only a 192.168.x.x address not know where to go to the net, correct?

  Second - when this router, is there a difference if I use the following static route:

  192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.254

  Instead of

  192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.254

  ?

  Whatever happens, the package comes to switch L3, but in one case, what happened to it through the interface VLAN 1 VLAN and in the other case, he gets there through the interface VLAN VLAN for which traffic is intended anyway. is what im trying to figure out, this will make a difference at all? especially with regard to broadcast packets?

  If it makes no difference, then it is safe to say that the following static route would be optimal?

  192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.10.254

  Re "of all". Fix. The L3 switch will route traffic based on its routing table. By default, he knows all IP subnets, it is directly connected to, i.e. all subnets VLAN. If you must add a route by default manually or not depends on the exact implementation. It would be nice if the L3 switch will use the no default for routing gateway that you use for the switch IP parameters itself (if there is an option in the web interface to set a default gateway). If you cannot define a default gateway on the L3 switch, you might have to manually add a static route. The easiest way would be to check the current routing table and see if there is a default or not gateway.

  Re "then." A router can only transfer the packets to the next hop router. The next hop router must be connected to this router. The route "192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.254" is correct for a router with IP address 192.168.10.1 and 255.255.255.0 as 192.168.10.254 subnet mask is connected to the router. "192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.254" is not correct. The router cannot learn the path to a subnet specific 192.168.20.0/255.255.255.0 using a gateway on that subnet. It is not correct to use this kind of a route and do not use it even if it might work even (because the router is a simple query ARP to find the MAC address of the 192.168.20.254 and your L3 switch will respond to the ARP request, even if it's on the internet of 192.168.10.254). At the same time that another router between 10 and 20 subnets it would work no more...

  Re your conclusion: I recommend to keep four static routes to subnets existing on the L3 switch instead of put in a single subnet more great which includes a lot of addresses that are not connected here. Technically, this works if you only use working IP addresses. But you will see some loops if you send something to 192.168.55.50 or similar. The gateway router it will send to the L3 switch that will return to the catwalk. They should understand it's a loop, but still, I would not recommend this type of installation... Add routes for each of the L3 switch subnet...

• Linksys spa3102, unable to connect to the web-based utility.

  I have a problem... try to configure my spa3102 voip router, I can't connect you to the basic utility web (192.168.0.1/admin/advanced) page that he asked me to in the installation guide.

  a reapears of error "404-File not found" every time.

  Help, please

  first of all, make sure that your computer is connected to the LAN port on the back of the SPA3102 - then, click Start > run > type cmd > click OK > type ipconfig > hit Enter - glance to the DEFAULT GATEWAY - use to access the web interface of the SPA3102

  ex. If the default gateway as 192.168.1.1 type http://192.168.1.1 in the address bar of your IE - you can then click admin on the upper right of the screen and then click on advanced, also on the upper right of the screen

  * Sometimes the IP address of SPa3102 changes to a different address, especially if the device when you connect the WAN port has the same IP address which is 192.168.0.1

• Can my router work with ADSL2 / VDSL?

  I've been using a Linksys Wireless - G ADSL Annex-A gateway, WAG200G router and it has been fine, now my ISP told me that they are to modernize the network and need a router capable of managing ADSL2 / VDSL connections, so my router will be able to do or I have to buy a new one? Firmware 1.01.09, any info would be much appreciated.

  Edit: I see the menu Modulation DSL which is fixed currently in 'Multimode' I also have options to select ADSL2, ADSL2 +, ADSL2, ADSL2 + AnnexM and ASDL2 AnnexL AnnexM but I see no mention of "VDSL.

  # The router is not compatible VDSL. You will need a new modem. This 'problem' is the main reason why I usually recommend to get a separate, simple and an ethernet router. The ethernet router operates independently of the access technology, i.e. you can switch to ADSL, VDSL or cable technology is what you have to change the modem, and you can continue to use the router.

  You would have only to upgrade the ethernet router if it is too old and too slow to manage your new internet speed...

• SIP over VPN and 1.0.2.6 Firmware RV120W

  Updated 1.0.2.6 and all of a sudden devices SIP works via the VPN no longer work. Downgrade from version 1.0.1.3 and they work again. Any ideas? My guess is that some ports are blocked on the VPN in 1.0.2.6

  I thought the whole idea was that fixed bugs rather than introduce firmware ugrades.

  Suggestion for Cisco:-Zip downloads of image of the firmware, or have an upgrade process which includes a CRC check, as it at least the poor punter will have an indication if they have been damaged. I had a subtle memory problem that corrupts certain files. Download of the firmware seems to fill in correctly and you can log on OK but some menu choices resulted in a deadlock with the "Please wait... the page is loading" message. Thorough check of the file sizes revealed that the file I'm downloading in the router is different in size to those on the site, a few hundred bytes must have been corrupted during the download. But the download was normal with no indication of any errors. It's a pretty basic protection measure that should be there as a no-brainer with the router was conducting a CRC check and showing an error if it fails.

  Hello Michael,

  Maybe you have active SIP Application layer gateway. Please try to disable this SIP over VPN works great.

  Firewall--> avancΘs--> remove the checkbox of the SIP ALG.

  Thank you

  Nero - UNITED Arab Emirates