SPATIAL QUERY VERY SLOW

I CAN TO RUN THIS QUERY, BUT IT IS VERY SLOW, I HAVE 2 TABLES, AN INTERVIEW WITH 250,000 SITE AND B WITH 250,000 POINTS, I WANT TO DETERMINE HOW MUCH RISK INSIDE SITES.

Thank you

JGS


SELECT B.ID A.ID, A.GC, A.SUMA
OF DBG_RIESGOS_CUMULOS_SITE A, DBG_RIESGOS_CUMULOS B
WHERE A.GC = 'HERITAGE SISMICOS RAPE' AND A.GC = B.GC
AND SDO_RELATE (B.GEOMETRY, A.GEOMETRY, "MASK = INSIDE") = "TRUE";

ALMOST 100 TO 220 "SLOWWWWW

I would do two things:

(1) ensure Oracle is patched with the latest 10.2.0.4 patches

It's the list that I worked with:

Patch 7003151
Patch 6989483
Patch 7237687
Patch 7276032
Patch 7307918

(2) write the query like this

SELECT / * + ORDERED * / B.ID A.ID, A.GC, A.SUMA
OF DBG_RIESGOS_CUMULOS B, DBG_RIESGOS_CUMULOS_SITE HAS
WHERE B = 'SISMICOS HERITAGE RAPE. "
AND A.GC = B.GC
AND SDO_ANYINTERACT (A.GEOMETRY, B.GEOMETRY) = "TRUE";

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • Hi fetch query very slow - maybe it's performance problem

    Hello
    I ask as below:
    SELECT d.gid "Global ID"
    
FROM load_data d  
    
WHERE d.gid NOT IN (SELECT peo_no FROM ppenpart);
    It is very slow. Is there any other query to extract as fast as?

    Thanks in advance.

    -San

    You could try NOT EXISTS instead of NOT IN

    select d.gid "global id"
from   load_data d
where not exists (select null
                  from   ppenpart
                  and    d.gid = peo_no
                 );

    However, resultset may differ, so please test.

    Several examples and explanations:
    http://asktom.Oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:2185750738300520:P11_QUESTION_ID:953229842074
    http://asktom.Oracle.com/pls/Apex/f?p=100:11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:442029737684

  • Void correlated, making query very slow

    Hi all

    I have a correlation query that performs evil and not sure why. Here is the code:
    *Explain Plan:*

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT

Plan hash value: 1791134653
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation             | Name        | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |             |     1 |   262 |       | 16216   (7)| 00:03:15 |
|*  1 |  FILTER               |             |       |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   HASH GROUP BY       |             |     1 |   262 |       | 16216   (7)| 00:03:15 |
|*  3 |    HASH JOIN          |             | 13708 |  3507K|  3456K| 16212   (7)| 00:03:15 |
|*  4 |     HASH JOIN         |             | 13708 |  3293K|       |  7579   (8)| 00:01:31 |
|*  5 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL| SKRUDAP     | 13708 |   388K|       |   622  (10)| 00:00:08 |
|   6 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL| SZRAPPL_ADT |  1197K|   247M|       |  6914   (8)| 00:01:23 |
|   7 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL | SZRAPPL_ADT |  1197K|    18M|       |  6791   (6)| 00:01:22 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
 
   1 - filter("SATURN_SZRAPPL_ADT2"."SZRAPPL_ADT_TIMESTAMP"=MIN("A"."SZRAPPL_ADT_TIME
              STAMP"))
   3 - access("A"."SZRAPPL_ID"="SATURN_SZRAPPL_ADT2"."SZRAPPL_ID" AND 
              "A"."SZRAPPL_CHOICE_TYPE_NO"="SATURN_SZRAPPL_ADT2"."SZRAPPL_CHOICE_TYPE_NO")
   4 - access("SKRUDAP"."SKRUDAP_APPLICANT_NO"="SATURN_SZRAPPL_ADT2"."SZRAPPL_APPLICA
              NT_NO" AND "SKRUDAP"."SKRUDAP_CHOICE_NO"="SATURN_SZRAPPL_ADT2"."SZRAPPL_CHOICE_TYPE_N
              O")
   5 - filter("SKRUDAP"."SKRUDAP_TERM_CODE_ENTRY"='201100')
    If I changed the line that connects the timestamp to the MIN (timestamp) of the sub query...
    AND nvl(SATURN_SZRAPPL_ADT2.SZRAPPL_ADT_TIMESTAMP, to_date('30/12/3999','DD/MM/YYYY')) = (select nvl(min(A.szrappl_adt_timestamp),to_date('30/12/3999','DD/MM/YYYY'))


then I get much a much much faster response. By taking swapping that line, this is what the explain plan looks like:


 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                     | Name              | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT              |                   |     1 |   246 |   104K  (1)| 00:20:50 |
|*  1 |  FILTER                       |                   |       |       |            |          |
|*  2 |   HASH JOIN                   |                   | 13708 |  3293K|  7702  (10)| 00:01:33 |
|*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL          | SKRUDAP           | 13708 |   388K|   622  (10)| 00:00:08 |
|   4 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL          | SZRAPPL_ADT       |  1197K|   247M|  7038   (9)| 00:01:25 |
|   5 |   SORT AGGREGATE              |                   |     1 |    16 |            |          |
|*  6 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| SZRAPPL_ADT       |     1 |    16 |    10   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|*  7 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN          | SZRAPPL_ADT_IDX_1 |     7 |       |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
 
   1 - filter(NVL("SATURN_SZRAPPL_ADT2"."SZRAPPL_ADT_TIMESTAMP",TO_DATE(' 3999-12-30 
              00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))= (SELECT 
              NVL(MIN("A"."SZRAPPL_ADT_TIMESTAMP"),TO_DATE(' 3999-12-30 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd 
              hh24:mi:ss')) FROM "SATURN"."SZRAPPL_ADT" "A" WHERE "A"."SZRAPPL_ID"=:B1 AND 
              "A"."SZRAPPL_CHOICE_TYPE_NO"=:B2))
   2 - access("SKRUDAP"."SKRUDAP_APPLICANT_NO"="SATURN_SZRAPPL_ADT2"."SZRAPPL_APPLICANT_NO"
               AND "SKRUDAP"."SKRUDAP_CHOICE_NO"="SATURN_SZRAPPL_ADT2"."SZRAPPL_CHOICE_TYPE_NO")
   3 - filter("SKRUDAP"."SKRUDAP_TERM_CODE_ENTRY"='201100')
   6 - filter("A"."SZRAPPL_CHOICE_TYPE_NO"=:B1)
   7 - access("A"."SZRAPPL_ID"=:B1)

    Centinul has provided a solution, I have provided another.

    Interrogation of several times the same physical table should be avoided.

  • Satellite P300D - 15 c is very slow to start WMI

    Hello

    My pc (Satellite P300D - 15 c) is very slow at startup.
    When I look in the newspaper, there is a WMI wich tooks 2 minutes East service delivered with an error.

    After that, my pc on the screen fr jumps 'welcom' starts normally.

    So I turn the WMI service, but that there are other mistakes after the full boot (tosipcsrv.exe close).

    Is there another type of solution, except turn the WMI service?

    Sorry for my bad English,
    If you can answer me in Dutch or English basic ;-)
    With sincere friendships.

    Johan Nijsse

    Here's the (Dutch) log of the WMI problem:

    Logboeknaam: Application
    Bron: Microsoft-Windows-WMI
    Reference: 2009-04-06 22:52:53
    Gebeurtenis-id: 10
    Taakcategorie: Geen
    Level: who cares
    Trefwoorden: Klassiek
    Gebruiker: Derby
    Computer: PC_Fam_Nijsse
    Description:
    Gebeurtenisfilter met query SELECT * FROM __InstanceModificationEvent WITHIN 60 WHERE TargetInstance ISA 'Win32_Processor' AND TargetInstance.LoadPercentage > 99 kan niet worden van naamruimte //./root/CIMV2 vanwege opnieuw doing 0 x 80041003. Mogelijk worden er geen gebeurtenissen via said thing totdat het clean filter is corners.
    Gebeurtenis-XML:



    10
    0
    2
    0
    0
    0 x 80000000000000

    1961


    Application
    PC_Fam_Nijsse



    ./root/CIMV2
    SELECT * FROM __InstanceModificationEvent WITHIN 60 WHERE TargetInstance ISA 'Win32_Processor' AND TargetInstance.LoadPercentage > 99
    0 x 80041003

    Very good thread on slow start up you will find under http://forums.computers.toshiba-europe.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=134947

    It will be interesting for you.

  • Vuze download is very slow... He pointed out that I have a nat problem

    nat problem?

    Vuze download is very slow... He pointed out that I have a nat problem... Help please.?

    Hello

    ·        What browser do you use to access the internet?

    ·        What is the full error message that you receive?

    ·        Is it only when you download on Vuze?

    I suggest that temporarily disable you antivirus software and firewall installed on your computer and check to see if it helps:

    Disable the anti-virus software

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/disable-antivirus-software

    Enable or disable Windows Firewall
     http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/turn-Windows-Firewall-on-or-off

    Note: disabling anti-virus or Windows Firewall can make your computer (and your network, if you have one) more vulnerable to damage caused by worms or hackers.

    You can also post your query on Vuze forum to get help:

    http://Forum.Vuze.com/index.jspa

  • After confuguring ip, localhost sharepoint site settings becomes very slow.

    I use windows7. After you have configured the IP address my local sharepoint site becomes very slow. Refreshing is to take more than 5 minutes. If I remove the IP settings, it works well.

    Hello Manu,

    Thanks for posting your query in the Microsoft Community Forums.

    The question you posted would be better suited in the Sharepoint Forums. I would recommend posting your query in the Sharepoint Forums.

    http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/SharePoint/

    It will be useful.

    Let us know if you encounter problems with Windows in the future. We will be happy to help you.

  • EBS 12.1.1 perfromance is very slow.

    Hi expert,

    Please suggest me a certain document for performance optimization. It's full use for me. for the OS and EBS 12.1.1.

    several times I check there is no additional process is running on my server, but the average load shows 5 or 6. I m sure about it there ' has no big query running, no not big users connect. Here, there is no no matter what process is running on the server because this server is slow.

    I m unable to determine why the server is very slow and show very high load average (top) and the application is very slow.

    the server is IBM with 16 RAM.

    OS - RHEL 5.7

    EBS - 12.1.1

    THE SIZE OF THE DATABASE - 350GB

    Please suggest me how can I solve the poor performance of the OS and the EBS.

    Thanks and greetings

    pritesh Rodriguez

    Hi Ranjan Pritesh,

    When was the last time you ran the program of "gathering statistical scheme." Is it planned?

    In addition, please see:

    Troubleshooting problems of performance of the Oracle Applications (Doc ID 169935.1)

    Optimize the performance of the e-Business Suite (Doc ID 744143.1) downstairs X-ray

    A comprehensive approach to the performance of Oracle Applications systems (Doc ID 69565.1)

    Simultaneous treatment - how to performance tune the concurrent processing server (Doc ID 986272.1)

    Performance forms listener Servlet in Oracle Applications (Doc ID 390031.1)

    Thank you &

    Best regards

  • To access the Oracle Postgres using DG4ODBC and very slow psqlodbc

    I've set up DG4ODBC a base of Oracle 11 g Windows 2003 32-bit to access a Windows 2008 64 bit 9.1 database Postgres, you use the psqlodbc (32-bit) driver.

    I can't do it because of the queries, but they are very slow. The reason is that the place where clause of the query is deleted somewhere along the line (I've seen actual queries run by Postgres using pgAdmin server status screen) and all the rows of the table are extracted from Postgres. Naturally with tables bigger than the few lines which means do a full table in Postgres scan, so that transfer a lot of bytes through the network.

    "For example, if I mark from Oracle like this: select * of" dps_user"@pg where 'id' = '2423', run the sql in Postgres is: select * from dps_user, which retrieves all the rows of the table! When I get the result of the query in Oracle, I get only the row with id 2423, so I guess that Oracle Gets the entire table and that he not filtering at its end.

    In a separate 32-bit Windows XP machine I have implemented the same psqlodbc driver, and ran the same query by using Microsoft Query. In this case, the query to run in Postgres contains a where clause and, therefore, it is much faster because a unique index scan is performed in Postgres, and that a line is transferred to Microsoft Query.

    Could you help me, please?

    Thank you very much

    Carlos

    Hi Carlos,
    Yes - he manipulated me the SR ;-)
    Sometimes they have a little more time and information to study can throw up the answer.

    Kind regards
    Mike

  • ARCHIVELOG apply very slow to the backup site

    I did a refresh of the data on the production site, then after the import is done, I found the file in the sync backup site password. After I synchronize files password on the two prod and Eve, Eve archivelog apply has been long out of sync.

    Now get going, but it's very very slow. I don't think it's good. Here's some data:

    Production:

    SQL > SELECT
    NAME IN STANDBY MODE,
    SEQUENCE #.
    APPLIED,
    COMPLETION_TIME
    Of
    V$ ARCHIVED_LOG
    WHERE
    DEST_ID = 2
    AND
    NEXT_TIME > SYSDATE-1; 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

    STANDBY SEQUENCE # APPLIED CAPS
    -------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------
    hysdev 18693 No. 2 January 12
    hysdev 18696 No. 2 January 12
    hysdev 18697 No. 2 January 12
    hysdev 18698 No. 2 January 12
    hysdev 18699 No. 2 January 12
    hysdev 18700 No. 2 January 12
    hysdev 18701 No. 2 January 12
    hysdev 18702 No. 2 January 12
    hysdev 18703 No. 3 January 12
    hysdev 18704 No. 3 January 12
    hysdev 18705 No. 3 January 12

    STANDBY SEQUENCE # APPLIED CAPS
    -------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------
    hysdev 18706 No. 3 January 12
    hysdev 18707 No. 3 January 12
    hysdev 18708 No. 3 January 12
    hysdev 18709 No. 3 January 12
    hysdev 18710 No. 3 January 12

    16 selected lines.

    SQL > SELECT
    MAX(SEQUENCE#)
    Of
    V$ ARCHIVED_LOG
    WHERE
    NEXT_TIME > SYSDATE-1;
    2 3 4 5 6
    MAX(SEQUENCE#)
    --------------
    18710

    SQL > select thread #, max(sequence#) in Group v$ archived_log by thread #;

    THREAD # MAX(SEQUENCE#)
    ---------- --------------
    1 18710

    SQL > select name, floor (space_limit/1024/1024) "Size MB", ceil (space_used/1024/1024) "used MB.
    v $ recovery_file_dest
    by name
    2 3 4
    SQL > /.

    NAME
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Size used Mo Mo
    ---------- ----------
    + HY_FRA
    368640 367839

    SQL > SQL > select ds.dest_id id
    2, ad.status
    ds.database_mode db_mode
    3 4, type ad.archiver
    5, ds.recovery_mode
    6, ds.protection_mode
    DS.standby_logfile_count 7, "litigants".
    8, active ds.standby_logfile_active
    9, ds.archived_seq #.
    10 v $ archive_dest_status ds
    , announcement of v$ archive_dest
    where ds.dest_id = ad.dest_id
    11 12 13 and ad.status! = 'INACTIVE '.
    14 order by
    15 ds.dest_id
    16.

    ID STATUS DB_MODE TYPE RECOVERY_MODE PROTECTION_MODE
    ---------- --------- --------------- ---------- ----------------------- --------------------
    SRls ASSETS ARCHIVED_SEQ #.
    ---------- ---------- -------------
    1 VALID INACTIVE OPEN ARC MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE
    0 0 18710

    2 VALID LGWR OPEN_READ MANAGED AT THE TIME ONLY ONE REAL IS APPLIES TO MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE
    8 2 16851

    standby:
    SQL > select process, status, sequence # from v$ managed_standby;

    STATUS OF PROCESS SEQUENCE #.
    --------- ------------ ----------
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    ARCH. CLOSING 18703
    ARCH. CLOSING 18704
    ARCH. CLOSING 18705
    ARCH. CLOSING 18706
    ARCH. CLOSING 18707
    ARCH. CLOSING 18708
    ARCH. CLOSING 18709
    ARCH. CLOSING 18710

    STATUS OF PROCESS SEQUENCE #.
    --------- ------------ ----------
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0

    STATUS OF PROCESS SEQUENCE #.
    --------- ------------ ----------
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    CONNECTED ARCH 0
    RFS RECEIVING 16852
    RFS RECEIVING 16869
    RFS RECEIVING 16863

    STATUS OF PROCESS SEQUENCE #.
    --------- ------------ ----------
    RFS RECEIVING 16860
    RFS RECEIVING 16872
    RFS RECEIVING 16862
    RFS RECEIVING 16878
    RFS RECEIVING 16853
    RFS RECEIVING 16866
    RFS RECEIVING 16868
    RFS RECEIVING 16876
    RFS RECEIVING 16856
    RFS RECEIVING 16877
    RFS RECEIVING 16858

    STATUS OF PROCESS SEQUENCE #.
    --------- ------------ ----------
    RFS RECEIVING 16874
    RFS RECEIVING 16871
    RFS RECEIVING 16870
    RFS RECEIVING 16879
    RFS RECEIVING 16855
    RFS RECEIVING 16859
    RFS IDLE 18711
    RFS RECEIVING 16873
    RFS RECEIVING 16861
    RFS RECEIVING 16875
    RFS RECEIVING 16857

    STATUS OF PROCESS SEQUENCE #.
    --------- ------------ ----------
    RFS RECEIVING 16867
    RFS RECEIVING 16865
    RFS RECEIVING 16864
    RFS RECEIVING 16880
    RFS RECEIVING 16854
    MRP0 WAIT_FOR_LOG 16852

    61 selected lines.

    SQL > select thread #, max(sequence#) from v$ archived_log in case of application = 'YES' group by thread #;

    THREAD # MAX(SEQUENCE#)
    ---------- --------------
    1 16851

    SQL > select ds.dest_id id
    2, ad.status
    3, ds.database_mode db_mode
    4, type ad.archiver
    5, ds.recovery_mode
    6, ds.protection_mode
    DS.standby_logfile_count 7, "litigants".
    8, active ds.standby_logfile_active
    9, ds.archived_seq #.
    10 v $ archive_dest_status ds
    11, v$ archive_dest ad
    12 where ds.dest_id = ad.dest_id
    13 and ad.status! = 'INACTIVE '.
    14 order by
    15 ds.dest_id
    16.


    ID STATUS DB_MODE TYPE RECOVERY_MODE
    ---------- --------- --------------- ---------- -----------------------
    LAR ACTIVE ARCHIVED_SEQ PROTECTION_MODE #.
    -------------------- ---------- ---------- -------------
    APPLY 1 VALID OPEN_READ ONLY MANAGED AT THE TIME VAULT REAL
    0 0 18710 MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE

    2 LGWR INACTIVE VALID UNKNOWN
    MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE 0 0 0

    32 INACTIVE VALID UNKNOWN ARCH
    0 0 16851 MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE


    SQL > SQL > home
    Oracle@oracle01[home/Oracle]hysdev$ ps - ef | grep mrp
    Oracle 20660 1 0 00:27? 00:00:00 ora_mrp0_hysdev


    Last night the archivelog applied was a sequence 15100, this morning, it was 16851, which is extremely slow.

    dgmgrl results:
    DGMGRL > see the hysdev database

    Database - hysdev

    Role: STANDBY PHYSICS
    State of destination: apply
    Delay of transport: 1 day (s) 4 hours, 40 minutes and 52 seconds
    Apply the Lag: 1 day (s 4 hours, 40 minutes and 53 seconds)
    Real-time query: WE
    Occurrence (s):
    hysdev

    State of the database:
    SUCCESS


    I do not understand why it is so slow and I wonder if the archivelogs are ignored? or is the area FRA prod is nearly full?

    Help, please. Thanks in advance.

    874437 wrote:
    Thank you and msberg much, you guys always there when I need help. You both deserve a metal.

    I'll watch the newspaper generate rates and I hope next time I can do better.

    Thanks again for your time and your contribution.

    Please close the thread, so that significant as she answered.

    Mseberg contribution was great again.

    Published by: CKPT on January 4, 2012 09:05

  • Apex tree 4 (jsTree) very slow in IE browser

    I looked at the view debug and found that the Apex 4 tree (jsTree) is somehow very slow in the browser IE - even query simple with small table. On the other hand, he came fast enough in other browsers like Google Chrome. Many of our users use IE - no choice. There is no fix for this in future releases APEX?

    Thank you.
    Andy

    Hi Andy

    There are a lot of CSS3 selectors not supported by IE before IE9, so without testing, I'd say 23 theme is unlikely to work in older versions of IE.

    For more info on CSS selectors that are not supported, see http://kimblim.dk/css-tests/selectors/

    Concerning

    Mark

  • Very slow SELECT * FROM table

    Hello
    could you please help me, that's why execution of
    Select * from myTable very slow (more than an hour and running)?
    Table has 2 GB, BUT the use of the disc is only 5%!

    When I execute select count (*) from myTable, usage is 100% and I have the result in 1 minute...

    Thank you.

    Please see the nets [url http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=1812597#1812597] when your query takes too long... and [url http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=863295&tstart=0] HOW TO: post a request for tuning SQL statement - model of accounting. Maybe comment by Sybrand on accounting for the new trace files needs a qualification, as the work through the normal steps of setting before posting the raw trace.

    I think you might have some misconceptions about the work of parallel processing how and what to KEEP. You can also consult the manual of Concepts on when things go in the PGA, and when they go into the CMS and find out how to see the use of the PGA. If you try to load the buffers of the SGA by making a parallel with full table scan, it won't, because this combination uses your PGA and multiblock reads to increase performance - negative in some cases, such as yours.

    In other words, you're [url http://www.doingitwrong.com/wrong/585_munkavedelem.jpg] made wrong.

  • very slow join on 2 indexed columns!

    Hi all
    I have 2 tables t1, t2
    T1 have a foreign key to t2
    When I join 2 tables and refrence t2 in the select select is very slow, if I joined them without refrecing select in select t2 is very quickly?

    T1 have millions of lines, while t2 have 44 lines

    the two join columns have clue about them, so why the join is very slow if I refrence in select t2! ?

    Maurice Muller wrote:
    Regarding is that I understand that all the filters have been put against the table t1. Because you have a FK activated between t1 and t2 Oracle will (probably) not to access the table t2 at all because it does not require simply all t2 data.

    Maurice,

    you're probably on the spot: the change described in the condition of 'register' above indicates that a 'join elimination"was conducted, I should read the post more carefully.

    If anyone is interested in more information on this feature of 10.2 and later: http://optimizermagic.blogspot.com/2008/06/why-are-some-of-tables-in-my-query.html

    Kind regards
    Randolf

    Oracle related blog stuff:
    http://Oracle-Randolf.blogspot.com/

    SQLTools ++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
    http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676 /.
    http://sourceforge.NET/projects/SQLT-pp/

  • My macbook air 13 "(2015) is very slow, even after a clean install"

    Hello

    I have a macbook air 13 "from 2015 and it is VERY slow. I did a clean install from scratch of El Capitan (10.11.06) and always very slow.

    Etrecheck give ' "Performance: poor"»

    Is there a hardware problem? or what to do?

    Thank you

    EtreCheck version: 3.0.6 (315)

    Report generated 2016-10-05 10:18:11

    Download EtreCheck from https://etrecheck.com

    Duration 17:11

    Performance: poor

    Click the [Support] links to help with non-Apple products.

    Click [details] for more information on this line.

    Problem: Computer is too slow

    Description:

    too slow

    Hardware Information: ⓘ

    MacBook Air (13 inch, early 2015)

    [Data sheet] - [User Guide] - [warranty & Service]

    MacBook Air - model: MacBookAir7, 2

    1 1.6 GHz Intel Core i5 CPU: 2 strands

    8 GB RAM not extensible

    BANK 0/DIMM0

    OK 4 GB DDR3 1600 MHz

    BANK 1/DIMM0

    OK 4 GB DDR3 1600 MHz

    Bluetooth: Good - transfer/Airdrop2 taken in charge

    Wireless: en0: 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac

    Battery: Health = Normal - Cycle count = 40

    Video information: ⓘ

    Intel HD 6000 graphics card

    Color LCD 1440 x 900

    Software: ⓘ

    OS X El Capitan 10.11.6 (15-1004) - since startup time: less than an hour

    Disc information: ⓘ

    SM0128G SSD APPLE disk0: (121,33 GB) (Solid State - TRIM: Yes)

    EFI (disk0s1) < not mounted >: 210 MB

    Recovery HD (disk0s3) < not mounted > [recovery]: 650 MB

    Macintosh HD (disk 1) / [Startup]: 120,10 (Go 104.05 free)

    Storage of carrots: disk0s2 120.47 GB Online

    USB information: ⓘ

    Apple Inc. BRCM20702 hub.

    Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB host controller.

    Lightning information: ⓘ

    Apple Inc. Thunderbolt_bus.

    Guardian: ⓘ

    Mac App Store and identified developers

    Launch system officers: ⓘ

    [no charge] 6 tasks Apple

    tasks of Apple 166 [loading]

    [running] Apple 58 jobs

    [killed] 9 tasks of Apple

    9 killed process lack of RAM

    Launch system demons: ⓘ

    [no charge] 47 Apple jobs

    [loading] 158 jobs Apple

    [running] Apple 77 jobs

    [killed] 8 tasks of Apple

    8 killed process lack of RAM

    Launch demons: ⓘ

    [loading] com.macpaw.CleanMyMac3.Agent.plist (2016-10-04) [Support]

    User launch officers: ⓘ

    [loading] com.bittorrent.uTorrent.plist (2016-10-04)

    [loading] com.macpaw.CleanMyMac3.Scheduler.plist (2016-10-05)

    Items in user login: ⓘ

    iTunesHelper program (/ Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/MacOS/iTunesHelper.app)

    uTorrent program (/ Applications/uTorrent.app)

    CleanMyMac 3 Menu program (/ Applications/CleanMyMac 3.app/Contents/MacOS/CleanMyMac 3 Menu.app)

    Plug-ins Internet: ⓘ

    Default browser: 601 - SDK 10.11 (2016-09-03)

    QuickTime Plugin: 7.7.3 (2016-07-09)

    3rd party preference panes: ⓘ

    None

    Time Machine: ⓘ

    Time Machine not configured!

    Top of page process CPU: ⓘ

    14% WindowServer

    4% kernel_task

    0% SystemUIServer

    0% cloudpaird

    Top of page process of memory: ⓘ

    670 MB kernel_task

    Mdworker (11) 188 MB

    Com.apple.CommerceKit.TransactionService (2) 41 MB

    Finder 41 MB

    Mds_stores 33 MB

    Virtual memory information: ⓘ

    5.02 GB of free RAM

    2.98 used GB RAM (1.82 GB being cached)

    40 MB used Swap

    Diagnostic information: ⓘ

    5 October 2016, 09:38:39 test - passed

    Hello, have you tried to reset the management system (SCM) controller on your Mac - Apple Support?

  • very slow Powerbook fine, iMacs

    My family uses 2 iMacs (1 2013, 1 earlier) and an Apple Powerbook at home. 2 iMac is incredibly slow, but the speed of the Powerbook is fine. IMacs both have a lot of unused storage and memory and I completely restored two iMacs and deleted unnecessary files, but they are very slow. I have everything back up on Dropbox and wonder now if the slowness is something to do with the combination of the signal at high speed and by using several connections of Dropbox in the House.  We have a Virgin Media Hub Super 2ac with advertised broadband router of up to 150 Mbps. I made a speed control using www.speedtest.com and the download speed is 105.81 Mbps and download speed is 9.70 Mbps. Any ideas anyone?

    You can view a report of etrecheck for later analysis

    www.etrecheck.com

    but I would like to disable and remove dropbox to test the system and if they improve the problem there.

  • Since the installation of the latest IOS i.e. IOS 10.0.1 and 10.0.2, my phone is very slow, especially the contacts do not appear in the search and the camera hangs on startup. the battery is also used faster then the previous version.

    Since the installation of the latest IOS i.e. IOS 10.0.1 and 10.0.2, my phone is very slow, especially the contacts do not appear in the search and the camera hangs on startup. the battery is also faster, then the previous version, use 6s with 64 GB

    Hello naqvi65,

    I see that you have several problems with your iPhone after updating to the latest version of iOS. These issues include problems of performance, inability to find contacts at a Spotlight search, problems with enforcement camera freeze after the launch and the battery discharge more quickly than what you are accustomed. I want to help you find a solution for these questions!

    To answer your questions with performance and your inability to find contacts, we will try to restart your iPhone first to see if the problems persist. Take a look at this resource for more information:

    Restart your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch - Apple Support

    Take a look at this Web site using your photo app troubleshooting:
    Get help with the camera on your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch - Apple Support

    To keep an eye on your battery use, take a look at the information here:
    On the use of the battery on your iPhone, iPad and iPod touch - Apple Support

    To help maximize your battery performance, this site has some good tips for iOS devices:
    Batteries - maximize Performance - Apple

    See you soon!

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem with Time Machine

    Of course, I don't know how time Machine works. I got a 1 TB drive connected to my iMac as I have owned and have never had a problem of backup. Now, I get a warning that says that there is not enough space on my 1 TB drive to back up a computer with,

  • Updated to OS... firefox no longer works.

    I recently bought a new mac mini w / OSX 10.8.5 and any transfer of my old imac w / OS x 10.6.5. I deleted firefox after you migrate all my software on and then reinstalled the latest version of the firefox software. The window opens, but it is funda

  • Satellite A100 loads the operating system correctly after the recovery procedure

    Hello I'm in trouble... I used the recovery CD last week after my laptop developed problems. After the recovery procedure, when I turn on the pc, it loads directly in mode 'Owner' - the pilot of the internet has no charge, Norton AV, supplied with th

  • Oldtimer new t5i difficulty backlit

    Most of my shots are birds. With my old manual 35 mm slr, I opened the fstops by two notches for a slight overexposure and voila no more black birds or detailless aircraft.  With my new fandangled digital rebel t5i looks like I will have great diffic

  • Windows 7 photo viewer broken by the software update of Intel Corporation display published February 2012

    I tried the optional "Corporation - display - Intel (r) Intel's HD Graphics" offered by Windows Update.  The patch installed properly.  I also installed all the patches from Microsoft in the most recent update at the same time - my system is up to da