Splitscreen does'nt give the second screen of the image, just green?

Similar Questions

• GetDeviceCaps does not give the correct pixel factor in windows 7.

  GetDeviceCaps does not give the correct pixel factor in windows 7, if I use 96 dpi settings means it gives the pixel as 1 factor and if I user the 120 dpi settings means that he must give the factor 1.25 pixel, in windows xp, I had good factor with GetDeviceCaps but in window7, it returns 1 instead of 1.25 pixel factor can someone help me with this problem

  ScreenDPI.x = GetDeviceCaps (ScreenDC, LOGPIXELSX);
  float PixelX = (float) ScreenDPI.x/96;

  Hello

  I would like you to post your question in the TechNet forum.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/w7itproui/threads

  I hope this helps.

• How can you save your illustration in Photoshop CC 2014 as PNG or JPEG file when it does not give the option?

  How can you save your illustration in Photoshop CC 2014 as PNG or JPEG file when it does not give the option?

  Thank you for your time and help in advance.

  Thanks for the reply. I have actually managed to do work. I had my work instead of 16 or 8-32 bit/channel value. Once I changed it to 16-bit/channel, he gave me the possibility to register under the registered name. Thanks again.

• OCR does not give the option recognize Portuguese?

  OCR does not give the option recognize Portuguese

  How to solve the problem?

  This is for me:

  

• The source does not contain the Image of HP recovery

  I am trying to create a bootable USB key with the HP recovery disk creation utility. After having moaned that my 8560w was working on battery power, and that he has no place on a USB stick formatted to FAT32 16 GB, I finished in the next screen that says ""source drive does not contain the Image of HP recovery " which is wrong: D partition is the main, contains the recovery disc." So what? Cannot create a recovery disk? Also note that I have no Recovery Manager (?) and F11 never worked (?). Decision of HP out of the PC business is probably the best thing that can happen to the customers.

  pher

  Hello

  See the link below:

  Creation of recovery disks or saving a recovery Image on a USB drive (Windows 7)

  Quote from this document:

  "Use a blank USB key with at least 32 GB of memory. HP recommends using a brand name of a manufacturer, to trust you. »

• Windows Messaging does not mask the images in emails after installing ie9

  I have Windows Mail to block images in my emails, but that after the installation Internet Explorer9 windows mail does not block the images in my emails even if the parameters are always the same. I had to uninstall ie9 for this reason, except that ie9 seems to work. Vista Home Premium SP2.

  Stringy salvation,

  Try to upgrade to windows live mail 2011 and check if it works with IE9.
  Maybe just the problem of the software with Windows mail.

  http://explore.live.com/Windows-Live-Mail?OS=other

• Why, when I send an email using windows mail (RoadRunner ISP) sometimes it does not transmit the image that are in the original.

  Why, when I send an email using windows mail (RoadRunner ISP) sometimes it does not transmit the image that are in the original.

  Some messages are not complying with the standards of the Internet and the images do not show before their delivery.  You can overcome this by transmitting the message as an attachment instead, and then the images will be intact.

  Steve

• my outlook does not open, the ball just goes round?

  my outlook does not open the ball just goes around and around?

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/2022778

  Error at startup of Outlook: "cannot start Microsoft Office Outlook. Cannot open the Outlook window. »

• Print screen - when I use the print screen key and then the paste into Word by pressing Ctrl v, I do not receive a copy of the image, but get a little red square about 1/4 "which does not contain the image.

  Can you tell me what causes this?

  Hi Kurt,.

  Thanks for posting your question on the Forums of community of Microsoft.
  I understand from the description of the issue, that the images stuck through the print document screen Word does not display.
  Let me go ahead and help you with the issue.
   
  Please answer these questions, which will help us to help you best.
  1. don't you make changes to the computer before the show?
  2. what version of Microsoft Office is installed on the computer?
  3 are you facing this problem in Word or other programs?
   
  I suggest for the link and follow the steps in the article:
  A red X character appears when you paste a linked image in Office 2003
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/825772#appliesTo
   
  If the problem is specific to the Office programs, you can also post the query Office Forum.

  Check out the link:

  http://answers.Microsoft.com/en-us/Office
  
  I hope this helps. If you have any other queries/issues related to Windows, write us and we will be happy to help you further.

• Loading screen does not change the Image

  I have a problem with the field of gif. What I'm trying to do, is show a progress screen that the problem is its not like an animation. Its as if she makes just the first frame of the gif image.

  I have load call that changes the image that some real treatment goes.

  I thnk its happens because of the event put on another thread. but I can't understand that out can you please help me? Here is my code can you please help where I encounter an error.

  DataStore.answeringThread = new AnsweringThread();
  DataStore.answeringThread.start ();

  final LoaderScreen ls = new LoaderScreen();
  ls.setShowLoader (true);
  Status.Show ("Please wait...", 10);
  UiApplication.getUiApplication () .pushScreen (ls);

  /*---*/UiApplication.getUiApplication () .invokeLater (new Runnable()
  {
  public void run()
  {
  try {}
  DataStore.answeringThread.join ();
  } catch (System.Exception e)
  {}
  UiApplication.getUiApplication () .popScreen (UiApplication.getUiApplication () .getActiveScreen ());
  UiApplication.getUiApplication () .pushScreen (new Answering());
  }
  });/*--------*/

  I am able to see screeen of loading for the first time, only to change its image as time passes but it isn't happeing instead, it makes only first image. and then the new response screen appears.

  If I comment the code between two - and - image changes as appropriate.

  Your problem is that you use a blocking operation and the Blackberry is never really painted screen.

  There are 2 possible solutions:

  (1) the blocking operation thread. This means that spawn a real thread to use UIApplication.invokeLater () instead.

  (2) paint before calling your blocking with the force operation: Ui.getUiEngine () .repaint (); It means the battery display to repaint and your screen will be permanently shown.

• Exactly how AE does not distribute the images in the scenario of a composition of 29.97 FPS?

  This issue is out of curiosity. I always wondered how this works because from what I see, a composition with a framerate of 29.97 FPS will have just 30 frames per second for every second on the timeline. Will it ever really a second on the timeline with 29 pictures in to compensate for the gap of 0, 03-framework? If not, then how is the resolved variance? Is the way the calendar displays images not 100% about how reliable they are actually distributed through time? Looks like this will have to be a 'yes '. But then how not problems of this?

  For example, if you want to have something to display a timer that counted in seconds right , helps manufacturers of second on the timeline would be inaccurate? Even if there is a second image 29 somewhere on the timeline to compensate for the difference of 0, 03 - fps, there still are many executives who have proved align perfectly seconds entire on the timeline, but in reality they would line up with them. So I guess that follow-up question, I, it is the timeline a accurate watch accurate actually seconds or frames in 29.97 FPS scenario? According to my way of thinking, one of them can be quite correct, whereas it is? (After asking this, I thought about the time value to the output text and look to see what is displayed when the playback head is a brand of second whole.) It showed a whole, second value for all those that I checked, and so this means that the timeline is exact frames, not seconds)

  Let me explain. This is going a little long so let me first start by saying that no. frames are lost, mixed or deleted when you run at 29.97 FPS. The only thing that changes is how you count frames. This info will be part of a forthcoming White Paper on my new Web site.

  What color television came the engineers needed to add a few lines in the removal of a TV signal part to send the color information. It is called color burst. The number of new lines that they needed a pris.03 seconds to add to the signal. Since all countries that run 60 Hz electricity works at 60 Hz, and television at the time was intertwined with a pair of even and odd scan lines form a framework so rather than expedite the time it took to draw each scan line was decided to reduce the rate of 29.97 FPS to keep things running at an even multiple of 60 cycles. This would keep old black and white televisions works without problem. Change the time it took to paint a line of scanning would be lack of things for older sets. Country PAL found a better way to add color information using some existing lines which were not used for anything else so they eliminated the problem.

  What's meaning? They had to slow the pace because they needed to add a few lines to the color TV signal would know where they were supposed to show the program in color. The largest number of lines still had to adapt to 60 cycles, so if you have added several lines, you reading fewer frames per second.

  Now, here's the problem. How you count this odd number of images and make it work with a real-time clock. Fall time frame was the solution. Drop Frame timecode does not diminish the frames, it just is not all because when the standard broadcast half-hour is 28 minutes, nobody's going to care about a missing image number... NOTE: I did not lack a framework.

  I tell him again. NO frameworks are never fallen or crushed or shortened in any application that is used to change or manipulate the video. The only thing that happens is that some numbers of chassis jumped so the hours, minutes, and seconds displayed on the timer is always accurate.

  You can get funky what happens with individual images or fields when you put images of 24 frames per second of a film in a video sequence of 29.97 FPS - but they worked already. The same thing happens when you add pictures PAL to NTSC program. When images of 24 fps are put in a PAL 25 fps video format they just play back a little faster so they don't have to do a funny interpolation.

  We will return to the time display in your AE timeline when you have a 29.97 (or the standard fractional rates as 59.94 or 23.976) default display time should be Drop frame that removes picture numbers that it counts, but does not diminish the frames. With DFTC (indicated by the; between hours, minutes and seconds) is used when the chronology said 30 minutes, then it will take 30 minutes exactly for your video playback. You can check this for yourself by browsing through a timeline with a Drop Frame timecode display one image at a time. Select the window timecode and top to 10000 (1 minute no seconds without frames) you will find yourself 0; 00; 59; 28 step forward of an image to get to 0; 00; 59; 29; and then a framework more far and end up at 0. 01; 00; 02 no frames were dropped, only the chassis of 0 numbers; 01; 00; 00 and 0, 01; 00; 01. the time displayed is correct in the duration of an image, that doesn't make much difference when you deal with a minute, but it makes a huge difference if you're dealing with an hour.

  There is an option for the Non-goutte time frame, but both practices, it is useless because the Timekeeping in the timeline panel is always bad. More the program error. Fall time frame gives you the exact time with a maximum error of a frame and a half. In the one hour show, you're out of 4 seconds. It is not significant for a youtube video, but it would be disastrous for network programming.

  You can check it out yourself. Start a new comp and the duration 1 hour. Add a solid layer and then press o to move the out point and you will see that the timecode is 0, 59; 59; 29 images. Do not get confused here because he said not 1 hour. Don't forget that the last image needs to continue to play for the program to stop because the CTI stops on the last visible image. Now, hold down the Ctrl/Cmnd key and click on the time indicator in the timeline and you'll see 107891 frames. A word of caution, if you look at the display of the time code and that you change the layout or project of frame drip not part time you will change the length of the composition and the number of images.

  Now, go to the project settings in earlier versions or to the Composition settings in the latest versions and select Non Drop Frame timecode display. Check the chassis numbers - they are exactly the same. Now Ctrl/Cmnd click the time indicator again and you will see 0:59:56:11 - If you were creating an hour long program and that you had the timecode set to image not to drop your program you would like to add about 4 seconds to your program. Imagine your surprise when he played on television and the last 4 seconds was cut off.

• F5 does not show the images and style sheets

  When I load a page for the first time, everything's fine, however when I hit F5, page does not connect to one of the styles/scripts and images are not loaded at all. I tried to run FF in safe mode (7.0.1), which has not solved the problem.

  But any page of our system, including those with much simpler presentations gives the same exact error...

  Thanks for your help, makes us understand in this case after a lot of digging around... We use a 2.5 abyss to our web server. Appearantly, there is a bug with the length of the content on images (and any support files) do not set correctly (at all). When you load the page the first time all right, but when you refresh the images are read from the cached files, and FF 7.01 does not approve headers corrupt on the image files (behavior correct in FF, but stricter than in previous versions!). We have updated the Web server to version 2.7, which solved this problem... We found an old post that makes us in the right direction as well:
  https://Bugzilla.Mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682511
  Thank you once again and for all users of Abyss Web Server... UPGRADE TO THE LATEST VERSION OR YOU'LL HAVE THE SAME PROBLEMS WITH FF 7.01... !

• Dreamweaver does not display the images of the root folder

  Dreamweaver does not display the pictures in the folder root in the browser:

  "< a href ="... /... /.. /.. / gen/index.php "> < img src ="... /... /.. ' / gv_logos/gen_logo.png "alt ="Gen"width ="130"height ="60"> < / a >

  "< a href ="... /... /.. /.. / english/mall/home.php "> < img src ="... /... /.. ' / gv_logos/gen_mall_logo.png "alt ="Mall"width ="110"height ="60"> < / a >

  I use Dreamweaver CS6. I checked display > display external file, it is checked. I unchecked it executed the script, still no change.

  I've been in the problem for weeks.

  It's driving me crazy. .

  Thank you all. I finally discovered what the problem was. My ' link to ' was created at the root of the Document.

  For later use, to all those who may have this problem:

  1. Launch Dreamweaver.
  2. Click on "Site" in the top menu.
  3. Select "Manage Sites".
  4. In the 'Manage the Sites' box, select your local site folder. For example, my_new_site
  5. Click on change icon (it's the second icon on the button "Import Site").
  6. The site for my_new_site configuration (for example) is displayed. Now click on "Advanced settings".
  7. Search "link to:" in the options, select 'Site Root '.
  8. Click on 'Save' later, the box disappears.
  9. Click on 'Done'... and you're done!

  You don't need to restart your computer for the settings save constantly. But if that fell safe, Dreamweaver shut down and restart it. All links should display correctly.

  But it is worth mentioning that all of the links in the following format will have to be edited:

  /.../.../main.php

  Just rewrite the link paths not all scripts.

• SSI does not have the image on the page files.

  Hi, I use PS CS5. On my site I have a SSI file appearing on my homepage index.shtml. Now, SSI file contains a table with image in there place holders. When I replace the placeholder image with an actual image file, it does not appear on index.shtml DW and browser either (instead of jpg file I have this ). I use the localhost server and all files have been uploaded to my server from my local directory.

  Thank you!

  You can use an absolute URL for the image "http://yourdomain.com/images/image.jpg" file or simply delete the main points and slashes of the path of the image in your include file.

  The second half of the suggestion of Nancy must use ROOT relative links in your include files.  You must always use only the root of the relative links in the files include.

• IMAP does not download the Images Inline in Gmail

  To summarize: my client sends to my gmail address a lot of emails with inline images. When I read the email in Thunderbird, the images are not there.

  Here's what I see...

  The customer uses a solution Exchange/Outlook (not sure if it's relevant). They send emails to my account gmail with inline images. I run Thunderbird/Imap on my pc to manage my email.

  If you look at the email in Gmail via a browser, the inline image does not show inline. Instead, I see inline tag the CID (e.g. [cid:[email protected]]). The image is there, but it is available as an attachment.

  When Thunderbird/Imap lowers the enamel, the fixing of the image does not come down. I see the CID tag in the body of the e-mail; That's all.

  Here's my best guess as to what is happening...

  Th original email has "Content-Type: multipart/mixed" and the CID tag.
  When the message is received by Gmail, Gmail retrieves the image inline content and makes an attachment.
  When Thunderbird/Imap Gets the email, it does not recognize the presence of the image as an attachment. If the multipart/related content Type, maybe it would be, don't know. When I read in Thunderbird, there is no image attachment.
  By extracting the inline images, gmail had to also change the content type? don't know

  It seems that the original email sent by Exchange/Outlook is valid.
  Gmail is obviously to get the image online, I see it as an attachment.
  I checked the recommended by Gmail Thunderbird/Imap settings.
  I have Thunderbird set up to display inline images.
  I been through various forums/Thunderbird issues and updated the config on the extraction by pieces, as recommended. I posted the question of aid there as well.

  My analysis of what is happening can be 'average', so, if it is, it is just to ignore it. The key is that the inline images are not making it through gmail to thunderbird via imap.

  Thank you

  Thanks for the reply. Good and bad news.

  - bad news, that did not help.
  - good news, I got a reply from the gmail support forums that resolved things, as follows.
  

  With Outlook/Exchange shippers, it is very common for messages to be sent to the owner of Microsoft ("winmail.dat") TNEF. Web interface of Gmail can extract the BLOB TNEF attachments, but Thunderbird cannot, unless you install an extension like Lookout.

  So, I installed the Thunderbird Lookout extension and restarted. Low' not behold, when I check emails, the original inline images are now visible attachments.