Square or non-square pixels

Similar Questions

• Save jpg with non square pixels

  How can I save as JPG and keep non square pixels?

  Thank you

  Tom

  t_Mc wrote:

  The customer has windows, she got the image on the web. It shows the IRON in the thumbnail and the Windows Viewer on his machine and mine. She wants only to his images. Christmas, you and I make images do not show the IRON on the desktop or in the Viewer. Sorry, I assumed that Photoshop did not record metadata, it is. My problem is that it doesn't work for the thumb of the office or the Viewer.

  There is little to say here...  If the image she sees is a frowned upon in various applications aspect ratio, it's a bad aspect ratio "cooked" in the pixels in the file (note my comment above on the use of the Image size).

  I had not thought of before to HTML properties / styles that allow you to "unstretch" a distorted image before.  It's doable, but I don't know how much protection he wins.  Any determined individual would be able to view the Source to see the appropriate size, then just resize the image in an editor.  He slightly increase the cost for them to do so, however.

  For reference I have mocked who here:

  http://Noel.ProDigitalSoftware.com/temp/AspectRatioTest/test.html

  Note that this can take a lot more storage to save an image with a large aspect ratio of distortion that a normal image of the same size output.  Interestingly, it seems to require less stretched when extra storage too wide, as the second image on the page above.

  -Christmas

• make square pixels?

  When I went off after effects CC 2014, I ask

  Pixels square 640 x 480 apple 422 (current settings)

  I get

  The NTSC - CCIR pixel aspect

  But I want TO

  pixel aspect square

  When I go out of FCP7 using compressor, I can get all pixels WITH SQUARE above.

  I import a clip of compressor made in FCP7 sequence with the settings as above, and there is no rendering in FCP necessary and the Properties shows - the appearance of the square pixel

  I import an AE (with effects added to this SAME clip) render out with the CURRENT settings in the SAME sequence and make IS necessary and Properties shows NTSC CCIR

  Any way to make the square pixels? I understand by default in AE is square, so...

  What I am doing wrong?

  Right.  Figured it out finally last night. worked exactly as you said. Great with a space all that black but works perfectly in sequence of the PCF to 100%. Refills fit correctly.

• Is a 720 x 480 square pixels prossible PE4 project?

  Videos I created in P4E and burn to DVD Watch large TV NTSC standard def but slightly blurred and less crisp and clear on a computer screen.  My uneducated guess is that it's because the videos are rendered avec.9 pixel aspect ratio.  I am transitioning into a situation where I will make video especially for display on computer screens.  Most of the presets in PE4 figurent.9 pixel aspect ratio I can say.  I think I want to work in an environment of aspect strictly ration 1:1 square pixel.  The preset 720 p pixels square of the course but was working at this resolution (1280 x 720) seems quite a bit more taxing on my system than 720 x 480.  I can't change the P4E presets to allow me to change the NTSC 720 x 480 preset to use square pixels.  Of course I could work dans.9 and then export to a square but pixel format that seems to create output expecially blurry where the text is involved also.  Am that I on the wrong track here?

  Thank you!

  Jeremy

  A separate but related thought on this subject:

  Most of the presentations that I edit require bring me in Powerpoint slides which convert by exporting to jpg and using a batch action in Photoshop to resize to 720 x 540 and then crush them to 720 x 480 so they will look good for 0.9 pixel aspect ratio.  This works very well for the DVD, but not for display on computer monitors. I'm trying to get my result including these slides ppt imported to look at without distortion on a computer screen. Working in 720 p seemed to solve this problem, but I'd rather work in 720 x 480 or 640 x 480 for now.

  Sorry Jeremy but no, you can not start a project with 640 x 480 square pixels. You are limited to the presets available in PE7.

  The slides you make in PE7 what resolution are? PE7 does scale down pictures/slides well when reduced to the size of the image. It is best to resize them for not exceeding 1000 x 750 in Photoshop (elements) and then import them into PE7. Of course, with a larger size image such as 1280 x 720, you can handle more large initial frame sizes. Maybe this helps the poor quality.

  Maybe you'll be forced to work with 1280 x 720. I know that it takes more time/resources, but if you get better results...

• How do the layering of colors on the only non-transparent pixels?

  So I need help to make a layer that is a solid color, which superimposed on the underside but only applies to the non-transparent pixels. Is it possible to do this?

  An adjustment layer Hue/Saturation with the colorize checkbox selected should do the trick

• Understanding of the Pixels square vs. rectangular Pixels & work resolutions

  Hello.

  I have some problems wrapping my head around work vs. rectangular square pixels and so on.

  I work in the first of 3 elements, and I have 3 cameras - 2 HD video source (a 1080, the other 720) and one other non - HD.

  The images I make would be for a DVD and Youtube.

  I've converted all the images at the same resolution - as I saw it, a large DVD 720 x 480 resolution screen.  Unfortunately, that was leaving black borders on images, so I went with 720 x 408 instead.

  Now, I can't Premiere Elements to work at this resolution.

  What is the best solution?  Should I convert the images at 720 x 480 and just work with the distortion and make sure the Youtube version was crushed down to height of 408?  Which would produce a better DVD?  Or is there a way to convince Premiere Elements to work in 720 x 408 and always do a 720 x 480 DVD?

  I am aware of the reasons why there is a difference between square and rectangular pixels.  I'm not sure I'm supposed to work with the PC.

  If coordinate you your Preset project to your source footage (in this case, some of them to the down-rezzed), you get no black bars, anywhere.

  If you HD cameras will be low - rez, behind closed doors, that would be my choice.

  Now, you have some choices to make. I would like to look at pictures of my camera SD, and if I turned in Standard (4:3) or widescreen (16:9). HD material will have been shot Widescreen.

  Let's just say that you pulled SD hardware such as large screen also. In NTSC, this corresponds to 720 x 480 w / an equal footing (Pixel Aspect Ratio) = 1.2 (wider than tall). It would be as well what I had put the project preset to, and also what I had put down-rezzing in my HD cameras to.

  If there are problems of sizing, it should be correctable with interpret footage, which allows to force before seeing pictures somehow. This can be useful when you have images, where a flag is not seen or recognized by PRE. This happens with some weird CODEC MPEG and also a few CODEC MOV, but almost never with the DV - AVI Type II - pre film always gets this right.

  Now, the total success of this will depend on how well your camera (s) below - ground and how they manipulate prices square at 1.2 Pixels Pixels. If, for example, the aunt margin calls look a little 'fat', you want to interpret footage to square Pixels and then use the effect > Motion > scale to eliminate black bars. A small scaling should not be perceptible - but you don't want to do too much.

  Also, be aware that different cameras could create Widescreen differently. One way is to just "reframe" 4:3 "resemble" Widescreen. An another shoot for 4:3 anamorphic pressed, then the NLE-like ONU it's treatment. The last is to shoot real 16:9 w / NOMINAL = 1,2. So, it depends on how your camera creates Widescreen. To read the specs. in the manual carefully, because everyone should be treated differently.

  As you have found, there are many considerations, when mixing images from different cameras. It must plan before editing and find a workflow that will get the images in a common format first, then a predefined project that corresponds to the value.

  The ideal is of as little scaling, as is possible. As mentioned, better this behind closed doors during the export (off-camera), or when capturing, if the camera has FireWire and pre can see and connect to it.

  Sources of mixing can be done, but it's not a Slam Dunk. The workflow will depend on several factors, now to do research to see which method is the best.

  Good luck

  Hunt

• Non-square of the place... (looked everywhere!)

  Guys, I know this is an old issue and I found much discussion on the need to change the images of non square pixels widescreen PAL pixels square for some uses, BUT still quite simply, I do not understand HOW to do it!

  Here's the story so far: I've shot a few videos on the big screen. I captured this video in first Elements 7, and it seems fine. It fills the 16:9 frame and seems normal. A wide scene of nice in PAL.

  Now, I want to take this picture and put temporarily in an application called Particle Illusion, so that I can add a few animations of particles on the characters. But Particle Illusion will not accept a film dv as pixels SQUARE.

  So, here I have this shooting session as a large screen shot in the Timeline in PE7, I would like to convert, (temporarily), a shot with square pixels.

  What exactly should I do? What do butttons I clique, which app to use, what device access... to these acceptable images to an app that accepts only square pixels? How I really accomplish this thing? !!!

  And how to do it back then, because once I added the effects Particle Illusion, I want to be able to resume this sequence to PE7 and reinsert as panoramic scene in my film.

  Anyone who can explain this to me in terms of less than four syllables will receive a free ticket to Disneyland.

  Well, I might have been exaggerating on the part of free tickets...

  BUT please, what seems like it should be so simple, but I don't know where to start!

  Thank you, thank you, thank you... in advance...

  Kurt.

  Moreover, these same options are also available in version 8 under share/Personal Computer / AVI, if you select the Microsoft AVI - as was the case with file/export/film in previous versions.

• Handling Non-uniform subsampling correctly

  Please forgive what is probably a very stupid question, but even those of us who did plugins ridiculously complex still need to return to the sources every time in awhile!

  My plugin attracts thousands of circular particles. It also applies blurs. At a given time in its history, the plugin called elliptic particles and not uniform stump in order to deal with non square go and ratios downsample odd (which uses these ratios, seriously?). However, it was pointed out that I should really work internally with pixels square and then, if necessary, stretch the rendering to the dimensions of the output, which is a logical proposal.

  It is, how do you deal with non-uniform downsampling?

  I have a layer that is 960 x 540. This is me like in_data-> width = 960, in_data-> height = 540, regardless of the downsampling. Normally I would divide just about everyone of them by the denominator required in the in_data-> downsample struct, so if I use a downsample 2 x I'd end up with a PF_EffectWorld job with width = 480, height = 270 (which is also the size of the output world). That's fine, as I always stayed with square pixels.

  However, once I got to 2:1 or 1:2 downsample ratio, this seems to fall apart. 960 / 2 = 480, 540 / 1 = 540, so I got a job PF_EffectWorld of 480 x 540. This isn't the pixels square - it is close pixels then circles would be would like fat ellipses when displayed stretched in the comp Viewer. Similarly, 960 x 240 (1:2) is flat pixels which would result in a thin ellipse.

  Is that a stupid question? If I have same penalty (Trapcode particular draw correctly for these reports to downsample odd)? I'm a little blind snow with countless things happens in the code so the answer is probably look at me!

  Thank you

  Hi Christian,

  honestly, I wouldn't bother... I don't see any "custom" of pixel size, and I'm pretty happy with it ;-)

  But if you really want to, you can use the smallest factor of downsample.

  Divide per min (downSample.X, downSample.Y), working with the "square" calculation and stretch it to fit the output.

  In this way, you can use your plugin with almost no changes in the code, and you keep the best resolution required.

  See you soon,.

  François

• Rectangular pixel

  Hi all

  I develop a user interface for a touch screen 800 x 480 pixels. The problem is that the pixel in this view is not a square but a rectangle. How do I configure Illustrator so what I see in my mac is what I get in the touchscreen. I could make this QT design but in Illustrator, I can't find a similar tool.

  Thanks in advance to everyone

  Manuela

  I can't stand the non square pixels formats. Only the PS and video tools are.

  Mylenium

• Type not responding do not to the pixel format settings

  Hi all - I have a question that has me completely confused. I use the version of the 2015.3 of output from AE and create a project with a composition that is 1920 x 1080 with a pixel square BY. In this composition, I have some type - the word "CONVERGES" - in the Gotham police. When I tap on the screen, no matter what I do, the type is distorted vertically (see screenshot) by exactement.91 - non square pixels DV report.

  I went through all the settings that I don't know how yet, the type is always distorted by this same amount. Why my type seem to ignore IRON?

  

  Toggling the switch of correction ON the preview window has no effect (because it is already in square pixels) and I'm working on a Mac with a monitor to square pixels. Any ideas on what is happening here?

  Thanks in advance to all!

  Have you checked your character Panel for horizontal or vertical scaling?

• Pixel formats

  Hi guys

  I use Pr Cc2014 and I edit clips taken with my Sony Z1 and my Canon 550 d (Rebel T2).

  My sequences are a mixture of excerpts from these two cameras. My exports were very good, but the quality could be smoother. To ensure my exports will have the best quality, I am doing the clips in my sequence as close to the other format as possible. A big difference is IRON. The Z1 is not square, but the 550 d is square. I know how to change reports, but it throws the dimensions of the image.

  Anyone has any advice on the best way to change the dimensions?

  Kind regards

  Graham

  Make a sequence to match the square pixels camera, I guess than 1920 x 1080, images of non square pixels should just drop directly into what he has to get converted to fit.

• 'Toggle Pixel format Correction.

  In what situations can see the difference when you use the function? :

  'Toggle Pixel format Correction.

  

  When you use non-square pixels. Read the help file.

• Pesky pixel problem?

  My camera is a Canon HV30. All my images that will come. So I put the After Effects composition settings such as:

  Which seems correct to me. But then when I hit 'OK', it sets up my workspace like this:

  

  The thumbnail of composition in the 'project' Panel is the right format, but in the composition Panel is not the right shape.

  I do the bad guys?

  MM

  > Even if this IS: why the hell would you need to see your comp without the correct BY applied? I was scratching my head, but I frankly don't see why that's even an option to see without correction.

  Your computer screen uses square pixels. Showing a point of non-carre-pixel on your monitor means a scaling operation. Put scale diminishes the quality. For example, you can choose to see the pixel perfect without scales (such as square) or you can scale them to see the image in the format it will be displayed like on a TV (or other device that uses non-square pixels). It of all about previews and has nothing to do with the final result.

  Here's a note for help from After Effects:

  Note: To see a preview of the pixels not square on a computer screen, click on the button toggle the format of pixels Correction at the bottom of the Composition Panel. The quality of the pixel for previews format correction depends on preference of quality Zoom previews category. (See quality Viewer Preferences).

• Tools-> size FP default grid of the Panel grid (pixels) does nothing

  Hi all

  LV 2013 SP1

  I want to set up the grid of 5 x 5 pixels PS.

  When I go to LV Tools-> grid Panel Options FP size grid by default (pixels) and change to 5 pixels, it does nothing.

  The FP uses square pixels still 12 grid, even when I restart LV

  This happens to others?  I'm doing something wrong?

  Thank you.

  

  Hi battler.

  as already said: everything is in the help!

  Change the grid in the LV options will apply to the new screws

  Change the grid Properties VI will apply immediately to your VI!

• Transitions pixelated in HD 1080 p 60 fps export to YouTube

  Hi guys

  I have a preset for YouTube that looks like this:

  H.264

  Progressive 60 fps

  NTSC

  Square pixels

  1920 * 1080

  VBR, 2 pass

  Profile: high

  Level: 4.2

  Target: 32mbps

  Max: 40mbps

  Depth and maximum render quality

  When I made a video, the passage of my Canon graduated 70 images D black + melted in the my opening titles is very pixelated (I'm on a Mac, the visualization in the two VLC and just using Quickview OSX).

  I thought my screening was enough high-spec and I wonder if there is something I can adjust to deal with compression artifacts? Set a keyframe or adjust rates perhaps?

  See you soon

  Lucas

  Export to DNxHD instead, using the preset HQX.

  Surprisingly, YouTube ends, and to my eyes, the final results look a little better.