SSD storage has increased the performance of EI?

Similar Questions

• Re: Satellite L500-19Z - how to increase the performance of the game?

  Hey

  Basically, I have a Toshiba Satellite L500-19z, with chipsets Intel Series 4 express. I know this isn't a particularly good game, but surely the performance of game should be reasonable?

  I get 80% of the time lag - while on my old laptop (which costs no more than £200) I could play World of Warcraft on it no problem (I played the Sims3 on this laptop and had very few problems. I'm playing Dragon Age, but it is almost impossible.) My laptop is not more than 8 months old.

  I just want to know if there is a way to increase the performance of the game? I thought that maybe to connect my laptop to a PC Tower, but that could lead to the worst game performance, so I said.
  I'm sure I can't replace the graphics card, I've updated my drivers, defragment disks and so on.

  Any help is really appreciated, thanks in advance.

  Hello

  Is there anything to do to increase game performance. It depends on the graphics card and Intel cards are not designed for games, they are a good choice for mobile use because they don t need a lot of power.
  In addition, the peut t graphics card be exchanged, s thereby.

  It s always depending on the game that you can play. Therefore, check the system requirements of all the games you want to play and if your graphics card is supported. Not all games support all graphics cards.

  You must also use low graphics settings in each game. You can use the parameters of t.

  For example on my Satellite U400, possessing the same Intel graphics card, I can play Half Life 2 which has already 5 years but always low medium graphics settings.

• If I activate 2 processors in msconfig, it will increase the performance of my computer... !

  If I activate 2 processors in msconfig > advanced > number of processors to 2 it will increase the performance of my computer... !

  Original title: two processors

  In most cases, you will probably have to use these options, but they can come in handy. For example, if you think that a startup problem is caused by the presence of more than one processor, you can limit the number of processors used to boot the system by activating the checkbox number of processors, and specifying a number.

  Mr President I'm on hp xw6400 workstation it has 2 processors and I use windows 10 on it, I want to run the two processors at the same time to improve performance is anyway you can tell me how...

  Hello

  Installation is possible, however, the operating system will use a processor at a single time. There are also the prerequisites if you want this kind of installation. Even if it is possible, we have no advice to use both processors at the same time, because performance will always be bottleneck depending on the hardware and the operating system you are using.

  Kind regards.

• RAM 1 GB upgrade will increase the performance of the Satellite Pro M30?

  My ram size is currenty 512 MB.
  I have the model Satellite Pro M30.
  As the old model, my laptop would be faster if I increase to 1 GB

  Hello

  Of course, the 1 GB of RAM would help increase the performance of your laptop.
  It must be useful for faster loading applications.
  You will notice also that your tools and other software will be faster.

  To upgrade to the 1 GB RAM, you would need two 512 MB modules.
  Usually the PC2700 DDR - RAM 512 MB module must be compatible.

  Welcome them

• To increase the performance of the system (Windows XP, Vista, 7 and 8)

  Hi all

  Most people enjoy to keep their work in the computer and working properly, as long as possible. I have provided a few interesting documents that they will help you to keep your system as recent as possible concerning regular maintenance. I am able to provide information for systems already in Windows XP and as recent as Windows 8. What's even better is that these changes and updates can be performed without modification or upgrade any hardware.

  Increase the performance of the XP system

  Increase the Performance of the system Vista

  Increase the performance of the system 7

  Increase the performance of the system 8

  Thank you

  I hope this helps everyone.

• ways to increase the performance of the processor

  It might be a silly thing to ask, but I can use a 4 GB USB key to increase the performance of the processor

  during execution of the movies netflix and Amazon to steam. I have 17.4 GB of free space, but then the streaming of the CPU usage is maxed out

  c increace disk space I made the following suggestions given by someone else in the community:

   You can create more free space in C by doing one of the following suggested measures.

  The default allocation for the restoration of the system is 12% on your C partition is more generous. I have them would be reduced by 700 MB. Make my computer right click on your icon, and select System Restore. Place the cursor on your C drive select settings but this time find the slider and drag it to the left until it shows 700 MB and output. When you get to the settings screen, click on apply and OK and leave.

  A flaw that might be useless which is for temporary internet files, especially if you keep no copies on the disk offline. Setting the default value is 3% of the walk. Depending on your attitude to copies offline, you could bring it to 1% or 2%. In Internet Explorer, select Tools, Internet Options, general, temporary Internet files, settings to make the change. At the same time, look at the number of days, the story stands.

  The default allocation for the basket is 10% of the disk. Change to 5%, which should be enough. In Windows Explorer hover over your Recycle Bin, right click and select Properties, Global and move the slider from 10% to 5%. However, try to let you become so complete that if it is complete and you delete a file by mistake it will bypass the Recycle Bin and have gone forever.

  Operating system

  MS Windows XP Professional SP3 32-bit

  CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT

  Intel Pentium III - M

  Tualatin 0.13 technology

  RAM

  1.00 GB OF SDRAM

  Motherboard

  IBM 2648AU0 (no) 52 ° c.

  Graphics

  ThinkPad TV (1024x768@60Hz)

  S3 Graphics SuperSavage/IXC 1014

  Hard drives

  29.3 GB IC25N030ATCS04-0 (PATA) 47 ° C

  Optical drives

  HITACHI DVD - ROM GD-S250

  Audio

  Intel (r) 82801 CA/CAM AC 97 Audio Controller

  Hello

  Right-click on any video 'flash' and select 'Settings' in the context menu, select the option "use hardware acceleration"...

  You have a graphics card installed... flash videos will / should use his memory for buffering streaming.

  go

  Start > Control Panel > drivers

  or look for updates of your display driver...

  or

  go

  Start > run > dxdiag > display tab, a diagnosis of your display drivers.

• is it possible to use external memory to increase the performance of my computer?

  I have a slow xp and each program/app/files in an external drive.
  But I want to know if I can improve the performance of my control memory left him in the external drive.

  Hi cesar vidal,.

  1. What is the total capacity of the hard drive primary?
  2. Since when are you facing problems of performance on the computer?

  Method 1

  There is no way the use of the memory or the space left in the external drive to increase the performance of the computer.

  See the article and check if it helps increase the performance of the computer.

  Slow PC? Optimize your computer for peak performance

  http://www.Microsoft.com/athome/Setup/optimize.aspx

  Method 2

  It is possible that some third-party programs installed on the computer is at the origin of the performance problem.

  I suggest that you put the computer in a clean boot state and check if it helps.

  To help resolve the error and other messages, you can start Windows XP by using a minimal set of drivers and startup programs. This type of boot is known as a "clean boot". A clean boot helps eliminate software conflicts.

  See the link below to learn more about how to clean boot.

  How to configure Windows XP to start in a "clean boot" State

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/310353

  Reset the computer to start as usual

  When you are finished troubleshooting, follow these steps to reset the computer to start as usual:

  (a) click Start, type msconfig in the search box and press ENTER.

  (b) If you are prompted for an administrator password or for confirmation, type your password or click on continue.

  (c) under the general tab, click the Normal startup option, and then click OK.

  (d) when you are prompted to restart the computer, click on restart.

• I want to increase the performance of the PC using Readyboost

  Here are my stats to computer

  Windows vista home (32-bit) sp2
  Intel Pentium Dual CPU E2160 @ 1.80 Ghz
  2 GB of RAM
  now I want to increase the performance of the pc using readyboost
  How can I do
  also how can I get the max of readyboost performance
  is there a support for an external device?
  thnx in advance
  Original title: readyboost

  Hello

  'ram 2 GB'

  You have too much RAM for Readyboost work effectively.

  ReadyBoost is designed for machines that have between 500 MB - 1 GB RAM

  The physical RAM you have installed, less you will notice an improvement using Readyboost.

  This is a very good tutorial on how to configure Readyboost:

  http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/tutorials/using-Windows-ReadyBoost-to-increase-performance/

  See you soon.

• Increase the performance of pl/sql delete

  version: 10g

  Hi all

  Help me please by increasing the performance of the code below,

  The code below takes about 10 min for deletion in 80 tables he recovered. Each table it does not remove more than 50,000 thousands

  Is there another way I can increase the performance of the below.

  I thought to delete forall, but I don't think its useful in this context.

  DECLARE

  v_num_2 PLS_INTEGER: = 50000;

  BEGIN

  THE C1

  (SELECT master: '.) '       || table_name table_name

  From all_tables owner WHERE = 'ARCHIVE' AND num_rows > 0 ORDER BY table_name

  )

  LOOP

  BEGIN

  EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'remove'. C1.table_name |

  "where arch_ts < (sysdate-530) and rownum < =' | ' v_num_2;

  END LOOP;

  END;

  Thanks in advance

  Without asking what purpose your code is used:

  You can enable parallel DML and add a hint of parallel to your delete statement.

  Something like (not tested, but you'll get the idea):

  Start

  immediate 'alter session enable dml parallel. "

  --

  C1 in (select master: '.) ' || table_name table_name

  from all_tables

  where owner = "ARCHIVE".

  and num_rows > 0

  -order of table_name<-- not="" really="" needed,="" is="">

  )

  loop

  Start

  run immediately "remove / * + parallel (t 4) * / ' |"

  'from' | C1.table_name | |' t ' |

  "where arch_ts".< (sysdate-530)="">

  'and rownum '.<= 50000="">

  end loop;

  --

  immediate "alter session disable dml" parallel execution

  end;

  /

  You can test with different values for the declaration of principles (degree of parallelism), 4 in the index and find the optimal value.

• Increase the performance of research in the interactive report

  Hello
  
  I created a report that around 10,000 + records. To load the report, it does not have a lot of time. But when I do a search in interactive report that it takes a lot of time. Please suggest me how to increase the performance of interactive research.
  
  I use Oracle apex 3.2 and Oracle 10 g XE database.
  
  
  Please suggest me.
  
  Thank you
  Sudhir

  Antonio,

  Pagination: thank you. My concern was if pagination is in the form "x y z", where z is the total number of lines, then all lines may need to be returned to produce the total number.

  Function: Nice modular approach. As suggested above, four by rank function calls could produce a LOT of overhead in APEX (or elsewhere). A way to see if it is part of the problem, replace the code in function just a call with the code online and see if you get a large (15 to 20%) to accelerate.

  Howard

• Increase the performance of MAC with the SSD upgrade

  I have a 21.5-inch iMac model 14.1 (end 2013) with 8 GB of memory and a 1 TB drive. On this, I use some applications in memory such as Adobe CS 5.5 and VMWare Fusion 8.1.1. I have Applecare on the machine until September 2017. I often find myself running out of memory. My goto solution would be to increase the memory and replace the hard drive with an SSD. I fear, however, that this cancels my Applecare. My research indicates that while that frowned upon, I can upgrade my memory and keep my Applecare as long as it is done by an authorized by Apple, but if I do the SSD I'm out of luck for the installed components. My thought is that I can get an external SSD and move the ' WIndows 10' VM (s), as well as expand and move the swapfiles for the SSD system.»

  My questions are am I right about the Applecare and warranty and I plan to use an external SSD to accelerate performance and ease the work of memory constraints?

  I have f

  I have a Macbook Air in 2010 and also a 2008 iMac - both with only 4 GB of memory (you have twice as much), both running El Capitan and the two with SSD - and perform very well. The 2008 iMac used to have a rotating disc which has recently failed, with the replacement of SSD, it is a remarkable transformation with the new SSD, it seems very quickly for me. Both have Photoshop CS4, which is not used much more, but they run this software very well, as well as MS Office 2011 and other programs such as Mail, Safari, Firefox, etc. (Firefox + Photoshop together put a noticeable load on machines, in fact, but while I sometimes hear the fans come on the Macbook Air, it maintains not up very well) No slowdown) You'll be in great shape with a SSD for your newer computer. These old machines that I use have Core 2 Duo CPUs, chips relatively slow, but they seem very quickly with the SSD.

  You will need to check with Apple directly on your AppleCare and so that would be affected. I don't know that anyone is not Apple should trust this question.

• How to increase the performance of the computer with the first?

  I have problems with rendering long time drops latecomers / jumping and audio on complex changes with Premiere Pro cc 2014 even with active CUDA.

  I would like some advice in the adobe community for what first put on my computer for him to run more smooth with the first and the rest of Adobe programs.

  My system specs are:

  Windows 7 64 bit

  8 GB RAM

  NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 ti GPU (drivers day)

  Intel core i5 processor clocked @ 3 .00GHz

  I was informed of some friends IT computer and some players that I would see the further performance with a better graphics card. But after the execution of the afterburner msi program to monitor the use of all during an export of a short film he showed the CPU 96-100% most of the time when the GPU only varies from 38 to 54%

  If the first is the use of CUDA, so the GPU use should not be much higher? Maybe I'm missing a setting that I need to tinker? Or do I really have to invest in a better processor?

  Thank you for all what is recommended can offer me!

  -Taylor

  There are SO many things that could in how any computer running these programs... In the "Presentation" of this forum page, note in a Panel on the right side, the "Hardware" forum... Please go ahead and ask a few questions. In addition, the Tweaker ( Page of tweakers ) Page is a vast resource of information, tests and test data.

  Basically... first thing to note is the CPU, the number of cores is cache, clock speed, then the way the motherboard integrated this into RAM, video card, & home readers (the bus system & drive connections), then the GPU and the table of drive you are using.

  -CPU: more hearts always better of course, and "virtual" cores do not count. Your i5 is a minimalist for the Adobe DVA. My i7 is a little better, but still not nearly "ideal." Mine has so-called 'eight' hearts, but four are virtual... not true. These programs will be in cloth the real parts of the processor, there is no extra wait States to charge things to put cache & back into 'virtual reality '. Clock speed is of course a biggy and not only as high as you can go, but settled at a speed that works best with the system bus & the RAM and the GPU. There are ways to understand this saying, of course. It's complicated.

  -RAM: 8 your casual work is barely enough for the operation. I'm 16, and it is nowhere near enough. 32 is pretty decent, and I drool on people with 96 + GB of RAM and a mobo which uses actually all this.

  -Mobo: the flow of the thing... and the flow over your mobo has through the system bus/s best. And such things like... how many connections drive there? You will eventually need to connect disks 6 or 8 for best performance... can you, without the data to all readers bunging autour each other on the bus to the mobo?

  -GPU/vRAM: get a hot card is cool... but ONLY if your machine can handle it. My GTX770/4 GB of vRAM is really a little overkill for my current system. Understatement. A good GPU for the use by you (it has graphics on the page of the Tweaker) with a few GB of vRAM and nuclei of a CUDA AREA traveling at a pretty decent speed when matched to the CPU/system frequencies... Yes, the good card is awesome... too card is a total waste of money, too little and you have created a choke point. GPU is only used for certain things, isn't quite the Holy Grail we often think that it is.

  -Readers: There are a LOT of read/write of data going on constantly. USB3 is NOT sufficient for reading/writing, but it can work very well for reading only, like the standard images (but not 4 k stuff). Essentially, readers must be connected to the mobo directly... and a very recommended layout is OS/programs/pagefile on a FAST SSD large (and no, they are not all the same); Another SSD for things like the previews, cache & database PrPro files and then be separate discs for the projects, footage, & exports or even better a hardware RAID 0 of 4 or 5 2 TB hard drives for files in project & footage.

  As we always say on the Page of the Tweaker, the system runs faster the point of choking more slow. You have to understand that one...

  Neil

• increase the performance of the query how

  SELECT * from load_log
  where
  filetype = ' O/c '.
  AND EXISTS (SELECT view_orders FROM ' 1')
  WHERE O_ftype = ftype
  AND o_loadno = loadno - < < this line
  AND o_cocode = 1)
  
  
  HOW TO INCREASE THE PERFORMENCE OF QUERY.
  THE view_orders IS THE VIEW THAT CREATED 4 TABLES THAT HAVE SAME COLUMSN EXCEPT FTYPE
  
  
  If I remove this line very quickly run the query
  AND o_loadno = loadno - < <
  
  
  
  PLEASE GIVE ME SOME IDEAS/SUGGESTIONS.
  
  Thank you
  
  STONE ROUGH

  hard_stone wrote:
  the index of the user

  May be you want to re - edit your post: I asked the information only for the "PRT_ORDER_CONFIRM_LOAD" index, not for all indexes.

  Goes the same for the table, only for the table 'PRT_ORDER_CONFIRM '.

  This list of values without the name of the index is useless, and a line for this index should be enough.

  Kind regards
  Randolf

  Oracle related blog stuff:
  http://Oracle-Randolf.blogspot.com/

  SQLTools ++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
  http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676 /.
  http://sourceforge.NET/projects/SQLT-pp/

• Increase the performance of the Insert using e DBlink

  Dear friends,
  
  I try inserting 4 Lakes records in a table using the DB - Link.It is taking a lot of time (1 hour) to insert the records, is there another way to increase performance.
  It's my insert statement.
  
  Insert / * + APPEND PARALLEL NOLOGGING * / in target_table
  Select * from source_table@dblink_name

  Nowhere in this thread I see the following:

  1. the hardware (servers) and the operating system.
  2. WEP (which is the speed of the network and the bandwidth?).
  3. oracle version number.
  4. any real time
  5. the time inserts take when it is not pushed through the db link but run locally.
  6. explain the plan.
  7. a DML statement.
  8. information about the indexes on the target table.
  9. information about constraints on the target table.
  10. information on the triggers on the target table.
  11. the evidence that the target is, in fact, a table and not a view or another object type.

  I don't see how someone can do more than ask the OP for more information about the fact that what was provided is totally inadequate to make a recommendation.

• How to increase the performance of xy-graph

  Hello

  I'm running a continuous collection of data with a NI PCI 6133 (4 x channel HAVE @ 2, 5MS/s each) on a WIN 7 PC (LabView FDS 2012). Inside a while loop I'm able to acquire 2000 samples per loop for each channel with a stable performance loop of about 1, 25 kHz. Out of these data, I'm 24 calculation values that will be shown on 6 xy-graphs (4 values on each chart). Data acquisition runs up to 2 minutes.

  Preparation of data and setting xy-graphs updated seems to be a big bottleneck. For this I wrote a simple point of interest, by comparing the xy-graph and table diagram performance clearify. For the same amount of data, the chart table is about 3 times faster, according to the ability to draw only the last value again. The xy-graph must update the whole plot of each iteration.

  If I also remove the preparation of complex data of the xy-chart, the chart diagram is up to 6 times faster.

  Landmark xy-graph

  

  Diagram graph of reference (including the preparation of data for chart xy)
  

  

  Benchmark graph diagram (without preparation of data for chart xy)

  

  Questions

  -Are there a way to optimize the data part of preparation of the xy-graph?

  -Is it possible to draw only the last value again in a xy chart as a graphic diagram?

  Why can I not use a graphic diagram?

  -Because the time base is not constant.

  My ideas:

  (1.) during measurement, I use a graphical diagram. I know that there will be some failure according to the variable time base. After the acquisition of the acquired data will be shown in xy-graphs (as an only necessary update) with the good time base.

  2.), I show all the data in a xy chart. Maybe just values the last 1000 would be sufficient.

  XY-graph with simply display the last 1000 values of reference

  

  Are there other ideas how to speed up xy-graphs?

  Thank you very much and best regards,

  Michael

  MichaGue_01 wrote:

  Why can I not use a graphic diagram?

  -Because the time base is not constant.

  This does not mean that you cannot use a chart.  You should read my injurywaveform charts nugget.  As long as you acquire your DAQmx device signals, you can wire all your signals directly in the table and it will load the time base.