SSL VPN and routing problem

Similar Questions

• RVL200 - SSL VPN and firewall rules

  Forgive my ignorance, but I have been immersed in the configuration of this device RVL200 to allow Remoting SSL VPN to a customer site, sight unseen.  I have the basics of the VPN set up in config, but now move the firewall rules.  We want to block all internal devices to access the Internet, but I don't want to cripple the remote clients that will be borrowed by blocking their return via the SSL VPN traffic.  This leads to my questions:

  (1) a rule of DENIAL of coverage for all traffic OUTBOUND will prevent the primary function of the VPN (to allow the administration away from machines on the local network)?

  (2) if the answer to #1 is 'Yes', what ports/services do I need to open the side LAN?

  (3) building # 2, configuring authorized outbound rules apply only for VPN clients, rather than all the hosts on LAN?

  (4) as the default INCOMING traffic rule is to REFUSE EVERYTHING, do I have to create a rule to allow the VPN tunnel, or guess that in the configuration of the router?

  Here are some other details:

  • The LAN behind the RVL200 is also isolated LAN in a manufacturing environment
  • All hosts on this network have a static IP address on a single subnet.
  • The RVL200 has been configured with a static, public IP on the WAN/INTERNET side.
  • DHCP has been disabled on the RVL200
  • Authentication to the device will use a local database.
  • There is no such thing as no DNS server on the local network
  • The device upstream of the RVL200 is a modem using PPPoE DSL, and the device has been configured for this setting.
  • Several database of local users accounts were created to facilitate the SSL VPN access.

  I worked with other aspects of it for a long time, but limited experience with VPN and the associated firewall rules and zero with this family of aircraft.  Any help will be greatly appreciated.

  aponikikay, there is no port forwarding necessary to the function of the RVL200 SSL - VPN.

  Topic 1. That is not proven. It shouldn't do. The router should automatically make sure that the SSL - VPN router service is functional and accessible.

  Re 2. No transfer necessary. In addition, never before TCP/UDP port 47 or 50 for VPN functions. The TCP 1723 port is used for PPTP. UDP 500 is used for ISAKMP. You usually also to transmit TCP/UDP 4500 port for IPSec encapsulation.

  Let's not port 47. ERM is an IP protocol that is used for virtual private networks. It is a TCP or UDP protocol. GRE has 47 IP protocol number. It has nothing to do with TCP or UDP port 47. TCP and UDP are completely different protocols of free WILL.

  It goes the same for 50: ESP is the payload for IPSec tunnels. ESP is the Protocol IP 50. It has nothing to do with TCP or UDP port 50.

  'Transfer' of the GRE is configured with PPTP passthrough option.

  'Transfer' of the ESP is configured with IPSec passthrough option.

• SSL VPN and Windows 7 32 bit

  I wonder if it is possible to have 2 SSL VPN client running simultaneously at the same time. When I'm working out of the site, I have to do the following:

  1. I call Array SSL VPN network to connect to the corporate network. I need it to be able to read emails.

  2. I invoke some other developed internal SSL VPN client to connect to the customer's network. This is necessary to get access to access the Citrix customer environment.

  When I run the 2nd SSL VPN, my vision behaves erratically as the gel or the loss of connection to the exchange server.

  SSL VPN network table is a SSL VPN split, which means that it routes web traffic of the company and nothing else.

  Developed internal SSL VPN is configured to route specific IP range.

  I wonder if there is any limitation in Windows 7 32 - bit OS that prevent me to simultaneously run 2 SSL VPN clients.

  Appreciate your comments and your support.

  Hi SamPersis,

  Your question of Windows is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. Appropriate in the TechNet forums.

  Please post your question in the Windows 7 IT Pro TechNet Forums: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/home?category=w7itpro

  Thank you.

• SSL VPN and ipsec

  For CISCO1841-SEC/K9, ssl and ipsec vpn connection vpn how, we can make and? The datasheet is not any specific number.

  Thank you.

  Dijoux

  With the PIX and ASA, the number of peers is specified in the license and limited to the number specified in the license (so in support of peers, you must update the license). From my experience of the IOS application does not bind the number of peers for what anyone in the license. So, if you buy a feature set for IOS router supports IPSec/SSL VPN, then this is your license for IPSec and SSL peering (no separate license is required).

  HTH

  Rick

• SSL VPN and Dynamic DNS - ddns on IOS

  Hello

  I am configuring a VPN SSL via SDM tunnel on a 877 router. The router gets the dynamic public IP address from the ISP, so I configured DDNS for remote access to the router. I would like to know if it is possible to configure the SSL VPN to support dynamic IP via SDM o CLI.

  Concerning

  Gerard

  Looks like I fixed the problem using:

  WebVPN gateway gateway_1

  interface Dialer0 port 443 of intellectual property

  SSL local trustpoint

  development

  However when the router restarts, it generates this error:

  Incorrect ip address first configure the gateway IP address

  No idea how to postpone orders for webvpn start until dialer0 Gets a dynamic IP address?

• AnyConnect SSL VPN Split tunneling problem

  Hello

  We have home users that VPN in on a regular basis, but when they VPN in they cannot print locally or to connect to local resources.  Is there a way to activate the split for all remote users VPN tunneling?  It is not possible to add all the remote subnets, especially since I don't know which subnets are used and it would be a question of management.  I noticed that when I connect to the House a new route is added to my PC, who prefers the VPN link.

  I noticed one of the options with the client Anyconnect is 'enable local LAN access (if configured) '.  Can I use?

  Thanks in advance.

  Hello

  According to my understanding, you need to connect to your local printers while you are connected to the ASA via SSL VPN.

  You can do this by creating a policy of exclusion of tunnel split on SAA and the local lan access on the client option, or you can use the profile AnyConnect allowing local lan access.

  Please find the link below: -.

  https://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a0080702992.shtml#dsfg

  I hope it helps.

  Thank you

  Shilpa

• Question of VPNS and router

  Hello

  I currently have a RV042G in my company.  It works fine, but I was looking for a solution that would allow me to use VPN so that I can tunnel inside and then again connect to the internet via the tunnel.  I want to have a way secure to connect to internet from my laptop while I am travelling and prefer to build my own VPN and do it myself.

  If I understand correctly, the RV042G does not allow this and it only access to the local network via the tunnel. What would be the next router allowing him to fill this purpose?

  Thank you!

  Hi rodman

  These devices work fine, you can also use third-party software not only software from Cisco to use the VPN features. On subscriptions, IAPH supports more special features such link Protect and IP addresses and you can have and buy a subscription in order to add these features to your device, however, if Don t you want what they you don t have to buy.

  Cisco provide one of the best support, it has plenty of support, it is possible via chat, email or telephone, it also provide assistance free of charge for the users of this forum if you don t buy a warranty

  I hope you find this answer useful,

  * Please answer question mark or note the fact other users can benefit from the TI *.

  Greetings,

  Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.

  Support of Cisco network engineer.

• VPN and DMZ problem

  I have an ASA 5510 with active VPN for remote access service. Users can log in and access inside resources without problem. the question is the servers in the DMZ, as the web server, they cannot access. Is there an easy way to allow access for users of VPN and?

  Thank you

  That will allow you to reach your dmz servers. For example if the demilitarized zone is 192.168.1.0, you can press their DMZ address 192.168.1.x etc. servers.

  Your other option is to use split tunneling, which would allow you to access the servers through their public ip addresses that are translated in the SAA.

• SSL VPN and RSA on demand tokens

  Hello

  I tried scouring the web and can't find anything on how to get this working. We have our SSL VPN using RSA atm but would also like to be able to use the version on request as well.

  I was not able to find any doco on how to enable this.

  Any help in pointing me in the right direction would be thank you much

  Kris,

  Any name of username/password authentication is (nearly) transparent to ASA.

  ASA or any device authentication sends a request containing the credentials to the back-end server that meets the acceptance, rejection or in some cases, a challenge.

  A notable exception side RSA's Adaptive Authentication (sometimes called tokenless) that requires further customization on the SAA.

  The people on the side RSA are a smart bunch they can usually answer how their solution integrates with different vendors/solutions. If I am that prepare properly (that I could find with a quick query) there is no additional considerations side ASA save to set the right server and point it as the service of the methods (and if any NAT/ACL to allow users access to the server where you can request the token to send - usually in a zone demilitarized).

  I am based on:

  http://www.RSA.com/products/SecurID/datasheets/9240_SIDODA_DS_0310.PDF

  and

  http://www.RSA.com/experience/SID/OnDemand.swf

  M.

• SSL VPN and access to computers by computer name

  I have a SonicWall TZ 205 running SonicOS Enhanced 5.9.1.0 firmware - 22o. It seems that I have things to work except solve computers by computer name. Since the client SSL VPN Extender I can ping machines, I can reach their actions through \\192.168.1.12\myshare for example but not of \\mycomputername\myshare. I tried enabling NetBIOS settings but still does not. Thoughts please.

  Thank you

  OK so in this case you can resolve names of machine by completing the "Wins servers" section in the same pop-up down (if you have a wins server).

  Often the DNS servers are also the wins servers.

  If you don't have a wins server, then will not work without creating files on each machine that needs to resolve the name of the host computer.

  Technical Net Bios is not a routable protocol

• IPSec site to site VPN cisco VPN client routing problem and

  Hello

  I'm really stuck with the configuration of ipsec site to site vpn (hub to spoke, multiple rays) with cisco vpn remote client access to this vpn.

  The problem is with remote access - cisco vpn client access - I can communicate with hub lan - but I need also communication of all lans speaks of the cisco vpn client.

  There are on the shelves, there is no material used cisco - routers DLINK.

  Someone told me that it is possible to use NAT to translate remote access IP-lan-HUB customers and thus allow communication - but I'm unable to set up and operate.

  Can someone help me please?

  Thank you

  Peter

  RAYS - not cisco devices / another provider

  Cisco 1841 HSEC HUB:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  ISAKMP crypto key x xx address no.-xauth

  !

  the group x crypto isakmp client configuration

  x key

  pool vpnclientpool

  ACL 190

  include-local-lan

  !

  86400 seconds, duration of life crypto ipsec security association

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac 1cisco

  !

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

  Set transform-set 1cisco

  !

  card crypto ETH0 client authentication list userauthen

  card crypto isakmp authorization list groupauthor ETH0

  client configuration address card crypto ETH0 answer

  ETH0 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  set peer x

  Set transform-set 1cisco

  PFS group2 Set

  match address 180

  card ETH0 10-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap

  !

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  Description $ES_WAN$

  card crypto ETH0

  !

  IP local pool vpnclientpool 192.168.200.100 192.168.200.150

  !

  !

  overload of IP nat inside source list LOCAL interface FastEthernet0/1

  !

  IP access-list extended LOCAL

  deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  IP 192.168.7.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

  !

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  !

  How the DLINK has been configured for traffic between the site to site VPN subnets? You are able to add multiple remote subnets on DLINK? If you can, then you must add the pool of Client VPN subnet.

  Alternatively, if you cannot add multiple subnet on DLINK router, you can change the pool of Client VPN 192.168.6.0/24, and on the crypto ACL between the site to site VPN, you must edit the 180 existing ACL

  DE:

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  TO:

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.1.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  Also change the ACL 190 split tunnel:

  DE:

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  TO:

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

  Finally, replace the remote subnet 192.168.7.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.6.0/255.255.254.0 DLINK.

  Hope that helps.

• 1710 VPN and VPN Client - routing problem '' maybe. ''

  Hello

  I was able to get with 3DES and CISCO VPN Client 3.6.1 1710. with permission of local aaa.

  When I am connected to the VPN I can ping to the IP address of the VPN router

  (24.x.x.x.) and I can ping to the router's internal interface (192.168.x.x).

  The problem is that I can't ping anything else - for example: hosts in the enterprise network (192.168.x.x).

  Configuration:

  The router's internal IP address: 192.168.x.x

  The router's external IP address: 24.x.x.x

  ippool for customers: 10.10.10.x

  The IP address of the Client after the connection is correct: 10.0.0.x (from pool)

  Maybe I'm missing something in 1710 confg? I have NAT interface internal? The default gateway of the net is FreeBSD, not the router of 1710 system.

  All ideas are welcome.

  Miro Pendev

  TI Administrstor

  Quite often, you will lose the first ping because an ARP must be sent and responded to, but if you get the subsequent pings, then it's OK.

  For what is able to browse the Internet while the tunnel is up, you must enable split tunneling. Add the following:

  > access-list 110 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  > isakmp crypto client configuration group my_usergroup

  > acl 110

  This means that the client will only encrypt the traffic to the 192.168.1.0 network, all other traffic shuts down in the clear on the Internet.

• configuration of VLAN and routing problem 6224 switch

  I, m having a problem accessing internet to vlan 10. I can ping everything of all the VLANS. My internet router/firewall is on ethernet 1/g11 and has an ip address of 192.168.5.254. I have no problem accessing internet to vlan 20. I add a static route to my router/firewall. What Miss me? This is my first configure a layer 3 switch.

  Configure
  database of VLAN
  VLAN 10.20
  output
  battery
  1 1 member
  output
  IP 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
  default IP gateway - 10.10.10.254
  IP routing
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.5.254
  interface vlan 10
  Routing
  IP 192.168.100.1 address 255.255.255.0
  output
  interface vlan 20
  Routing

  192.168.5.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
  output

  !
  interface ethernet 1/g1
  switchport mode general
  pvid switchport General 10
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 10
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g2
  switchport mode general
  pvid switchport General 10
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 10
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g11
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 20

  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 20
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g12
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 20
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 20
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g13
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 20
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 20
  output
  output

  Route ip console #show

  The traffic code: R - RIP derived, O - OSPF derived, C - connected, S - static
  B - BGP derived, IA - OSPF Inter zone
  E1 - OSPF external Type 1, E2 - OSPF external Type 2
  N1 - OSPF NSSA external Type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external Type 2

  S 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 192.168.5.254, vlan 20
  C 192.168.5.0/24 [0/0], directly connected, vlan 20
  192.168.100.0/24 C [0/0], directly connected, vlan 10

  Console #.

  
  

• Difference between webVPN, SSL vpn and ipsec client

  Hello

  We just bought an ASA5510 and I am trying to understand the difference of the possibilities mentioned VPN. Can anyone describe the differences and use scenarios of all types of remote access vpn of the asa?

  Thanks in advance.

  Rgds,

  Rasmus

  Hi Rasmus,

  They use different SSH and IPSEC protocols, and there is also of course in terms of security.

  SSL is easy to deploy than ipsec. Imagine that you have 200 + users and to connect to the vpn, you must give them the pcf file and client software, which is not required in the case of SSL.

  Kind regards

  ~ JG

  Please note if assistance

• The IPSec VPN and routing

  Hello

  I was polishing my PSAB on since I am currently in a job where I can't touch a lot of this stuff.  By a laboratory set up a site to IPSec VPN between two routers IOS.

  For example:

  https://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps9422/products_configuration_example09186a0080ba1d0a.shtml

  The routers must specify how to route to the protected network.  Although I guess they could just use a default route to 172.17.1.2 as well.

  for example IP road 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 172.17.1.2

  172.17.1.2 won't have the slightest clue as to how to route for 10.10.10.0

  Even in an example with a tunnel between the ASA and the router IOS ASA failed to indicate a direct route to the subnet protected from 10.20.10.0, but it must still have a default route configuration. (https://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5855/products_configuration_example09186a0080a9a7a3.shtml#CLI)

  So it is basically saying, to reach the protected subnet to resolve the next hop on a device that has no idea where this subnet is anyway.  Shouldn't all the peer IP-based routing, and not on a subnet that routers between the two should have no idea they exist?

  The main hypothesis that I have here is that the protected subnets are not accessible unless the VPN tunnel is up.  Most of my experience of the VPN site-to-site is with PIX / ASA, and I've never had to specify a route towards the protected subnet (for example 172.16.228.0).  I guess he just used his default gateway that has an Internet IP belonging to the ISP.  However the ISP has no idea where is 172.16.228.0.

  Edit: I found a thread, do not report with Cisco but IPSec in general, this seems to be the question in case I don't have a lot of sense:

  http://comments.Gmane.org/Gmane.OS.OpenBSD.misc/192986

  He still does not seem logical to me.  If I have a tunnel linking the two class C networks by internet, the only routers having knowledge of these networks are the two counterparts.  Why a course should be (static, dynamic, default etc,) which seems to send traffic to a device that do not know where is the class C networks?  Although I have to take in my example with the 172.17.228.0 my ASA was not actually sends out packets to my ISP gateway with 172.17.228.0 in them.

  The purpose of the trail is * not * to send traffic to your next jump. You are right that the next hop router has no idea what to do with this package. This way is important for the local operation. The router must find the interface of output for the package. 'S done it with the road to the next-hop-router. If you remember that the road to your peer IPSec, your router must do a recursive search routing. After the outging interface is found, traffic is sent to this interface, the card encryption on this interface jumps and protects your traffic that is routed to your IPSec peer.

  --
  Don't stop once you have upgraded your network! Improve the world by lending money to low-income workers:
  http://www.Kiva.org/invitedBy/karsteni