1710 VPN and VPN Client - routing problem '' maybe. ''

Similar Questions

• IPSec site to site VPN cisco VPN client routing problem and

  Hello

  I'm really stuck with the configuration of ipsec site to site vpn (hub to spoke, multiple rays) with cisco vpn remote client access to this vpn.

  The problem is with remote access - cisco vpn client access - I can communicate with hub lan - but I need also communication of all lans speaks of the cisco vpn client.

  There are on the shelves, there is no material used cisco - routers DLINK.

  Someone told me that it is possible to use NAT to translate remote access IP-lan-HUB customers and thus allow communication - but I'm unable to set up and operate.

  Can someone help me please?

  Thank you

  Peter

  RAYS - not cisco devices / another provider

  Cisco 1841 HSEC HUB:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  ISAKMP crypto key x xx address no.-xauth

  !

  the group x crypto isakmp client configuration

  x key

  pool vpnclientpool

  ACL 190

  include-local-lan

  !

  86400 seconds, duration of life crypto ipsec security association

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac 1cisco

  !

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

  Set transform-set 1cisco

  !

  card crypto ETH0 client authentication list userauthen

  card crypto isakmp authorization list groupauthor ETH0

  client configuration address card crypto ETH0 answer

  ETH0 1 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  set peer x

  Set transform-set 1cisco

  PFS group2 Set

  match address 180

  card ETH0 10-isakmp ipsec crypto dynamic dynmap

  !

  !

  interface FastEthernet0/1

  Description $ES_WAN$

  card crypto ETH0

  !

  IP local pool vpnclientpool 192.168.200.100 192.168.200.150

  !

  !

  overload of IP nat inside source list LOCAL interface FastEthernet0/1

  !

  IP access-list extended LOCAL

  deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  deny ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  IP 192.168.7.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

  !

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  !

  How the DLINK has been configured for traffic between the site to site VPN subnets? You are able to add multiple remote subnets on DLINK? If you can, then you must add the pool of Client VPN subnet.

  Alternatively, if you cannot add multiple subnet on DLINK router, you can change the pool of Client VPN 192.168.6.0/24, and on the crypto ACL between the site to site VPN, you must edit the 180 existing ACL

  DE:

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  TO:

  access-list 180 allow ip 192.168.6.0 0.0.1.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  Also change the ACL 190 split tunnel:

  DE:

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255

  TO:

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.7.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 190 allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.6.0 0.0.0.255

  Finally, replace the remote subnet 192.168.7.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.6.0/255.255.254.0 DLINK.

  Hope that helps.

• ASA problem inside the VPN client routing

  Hello

  I have a problem where I can't reach the VPN clients with their vpn IP pool from the inside or the asa itself. Connect VPN clients can access internal network very well. I have no nat configured for the pool of vpn and packet trace crypt packages and puts it into the tunnel. I'm not sure what's wrong.

  Here are a few relevant config:

  network object obj - 192.168.245.0

  192.168.245.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

  192.168.245.1 - 192.168.245.50 vpn IP local pool

  NAT (inside, outside) static source any any destination static obj - 192.168.245.0 obj - 192.168.245.0 no-proxy-arp-search to itinerary

  Out of Packet trace:

  Firewall # entry packet - trace inside the x.x.x.x icmp 8 0 192.168.245.33

  Phase: 1

  Type: ACCESS-LIST

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Implicit rule

  Additional information:

  MAC access list

  Phase: 2

  Type:-ROUTE SEARCH

  Subtype: entry

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  in 192.168.245.33 255.255.255.255 outside

  Phase: 3

  Type: ACCESS-LIST

  Subtype: Journal

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Access-group acl-Interior interface inside

  access list acl-Interior extended icmp permitted an echo

  Additional information:

  Phase: 4

  Type: IP-OPTIONS

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  Phase: 5

  Type: INSPECT

  Subtype: np - inspect

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  Phase: 6

  Type:

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  Phase: 7

  Type: NAT

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  NAT (inside, outside) static source any any destination static obj - 192.168.245.0

  obj - 192.168.245.0 no-proxy-arp-search to itinerary

  Additional information:

  Definition of static 0/x.x.x.x-x.x.x.x/0

  Phase: 8

  Type: VPN

  Subtype: encrypt

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  Phase: 9

  Type: CREATING STREAMS

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  New workflow created with the 277723432 id, package sent to the next module

  Result:

  input interface: inside

  entry status: to the top

  entry-line-status: to the top

  output interface: outside

  the status of the output: to the top

  output-line-status: to the top

  Action: allow

  There is no route to the address pool of vpn. Maybe that's the problem? I don't know than that used to work before we went to 8.4.

  Check if the firewall is enabled on your host from the client ravpn and blocking your pings.

• ASA VPN server and vpn client router 871

  Hi all

  I have ASA 5510 as simple VPN server and 871 router as simple VPN client. I want to have the user ID and permanent password on 871 and not to re - enter username and password since 871 uses dynamic IP address and every time I have to ' cry ipsec client ezvpn xauth "and type user name and password.

  any suggestions would be much appreciated.

  Thank you

  Alex

  Do "crypto ipsec client ezvpn show ' on 871, does say:

  ...

  Save password: refused

  ...

  ezVPN server dictates the client if it can automatically connect with saved password.

  Set "enable password storage" under the group policy on the ASA.

  Kind regards

  Roman

• 2 MCU and VCS Expressway, routing problem

  Hi all

  We have a design with a group of control VCS (2 members), cluster VCS Expressway (2 members), and a couple of microcontrollers (registred H.323 on VCS control cluster with the same prefix: 90).

  Each highway has a public IP address and incoming calls from outside can only be routed to microcontrollers:

  [email protected]/ * / for MCU_1 and [email protected]/ * / for MCU_2 (we don't have external DNS resolution).

  I put a conversion into motorway of VCS to change [email protected]/ * / to [email protected] / * / and [email protected]/ * / to [email protected] / * /.

  The problem is when someone calls [email protected]/ * / sometimes (randomly) the call is routed to MCU_2 (instead of MCU_1) and if the appellant see the auto attendant.

  The occcurs even then of the appeal [email protected]/ * / (MCU_2), sometimes the call is routed to MCU_1.

  Any idea what can cause this device or a way to make it work well?

  Thanks for help.

  José

  I think still that separate prefix would work, but here are a few ideas:

  Are incoming calls which do not possibly using SIP that is being interoperability H323 or incoming calls all certainly the H323?

  If you want to keep pure H323, you could perhaps just have a search rule/turn on your VCS-E who changed [email protected] to an E164 e.g. 90... and had a search on your VCS - C rule that says 90... stop at the local area.

  I also noticed that you direct calls to [number]@MCU-IP - have you tried to direct all calls to [number]@VCS-C IP instead?  If the VCS is the holder of a registration for a number, it should be able to deliver accordingly.

• Apple Airport Extreme and new FIOS router - problem

  Hello, I have an Apple Airport Extreme 802.11n base station, which worked well with a Comcast router.  When you set up with Comcast router, I set the router to comcast to bridge and the Airport Extreme has done all the work as the main router. When I switched to Verizon FIOS today, I get the typical mistake of NAT double (that I did with the Comcast before configuring the router to Comcast to bridge).  However, the tech support guy FIOS said that was not an option, so he set up my Airport Extreme in bridge - router off mode mode.  This really live to the top incoming access using SSH, Timbuktu or the Apple screen sharing, given that I can't assign fixed IP addresses to the computers on my network and can not use the Airport Utility Network Port settings to open "pipes" for a particular computer.  In addition, I'm more comfortable using Airport Extreme, rather than things FIOS. Someone at - it other than enter Comcast suggestions?

  I did a search and didn't see a post on this in the discussion forum.  Thank you

  What is the brand and model of your router Verizon? Verizon provides you with administrator access to it to allow you to make changes?

• Cisco VPN Client and 64-Bit OS Support

  I'm in the stages of planning/testing of migrating users to the Cisco VPN client. Problem that I came across well is that I can't find a version that supports 64-bit operating systems. I looked through the Download Center with no luck. I'm a little more looking for a version out there? Thanks in advance.

  As much as I know there is no 64-bit support and is not yet on the roadmap of IPSEC VPN Client. For more details, see:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/ASA/compatibility/ASA-VPN-compatibility.html

  Concerning

  Farrukh

• Routing problem between the VPN Client and the router's Ethernet device

  Hello

  I have a Cisco 1721 in a test environment.

  A net 172.16.0.0/19 simulates the Internet and a net 192.168.1.0/24 simulates the net, the VPN tunnel must go to (intranet).

  The net 172.16.0.0 depends on the router 0 FastEthernet, Intranet (VPN) hangs on Ethernet 0.

  The configuration was inspired form the sample Configuration

  "Configuring the Client VPN Cisco 3.x for Windows to IOS using Local extended authentication"

  and the output of the ConfigMaker configuration.

  Authentication and logon works. Client receives an IP address from the pool. But there's a routing problem

  side of routers. Ping client-side - do not work (the VPN client statistics that count encrypt them packets, but not to decrypt).

  Ping the router works too, but decrypt and encrypt customer statistics in VPN packets count progressive

  (customer has a correct route and return ICMP packets to the router).

  The question now is:

  How to route packets between the Tunnel and an Ethernet device (Ethernet 0)?

  conf of the router is attached - hope that's not too...

  Thanks & cordially

  Thomas Schmidt

  -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- snipp .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

  !

  version 12.2

  horodateurs service debug uptime

  Log service timestamps uptime

  encryption password service

  !

  !

  host name * moderator edit *.

  !

  enable secret 5 * moderator edit *.

  !

  !

  AAA new-model

  AAA authentication login userauthen local

  AAA authorization groupauthor LAN

  !

  ! only for the test...

  !

  username cisco password 0 * moderator edit *.

  !

  IP subnet zero

  !

  audit of IP notify Journal

  Max-events of po verification IP 100

  !

  crypto ISAKMP policy 3

  3des encryption

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  !

  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group 3000client

  key cisco123

  pool ippool

  !

  ! We do not want to divide the tunnel

  ! ACL 108

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac RIGHT

  !

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10

  Set transform-set RIGHT

  !

  map clientmap client to authenticate crypto list userauthen

  card crypto clientmap isakmp authorization list groupauthor

  client configuration address map clientmap crypto answer

  10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap Dynamics dynmap

  !

  interface Ethernet0

  no downtime

  Description connected to VPN

  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0

  full-duplex

  IP access-group 101 in

  IP access-group 101 out

  KeepAlive 10

  No cdp enable

  !

  interface Ethernet1

  no downtime

  address 192.168.3.1 IP 255.255.255.0

  IP access-group 101 in

  IP access-group 101 out

  full-duplex

  KeepAlive 10

  No cdp enable

  !

  interface FastEthernet0

  no downtime

  Description connected to the Internet

  IP 172.16.12.20 255.255.224.0

  automatic speed

  KeepAlive 10

  No cdp enable

  !

  ! This access group is also only for test cases!

  !

  no access list 101

  access list 101 ip allow a whole

  !

  local pool IP 192.168.10.1 ippool 192.168.10.10

  IP classless

  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.12.20

  enable IP pim Bennett

  !

  Line con 0

  exec-timeout 0 0

  password 7 * edit from moderator *.

  line to 0

  line vty 0 4

  !

  end

  ^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^- snapp ^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-

  Thomas,

  Can't wait to show something that might be there, but I don't see here. You do not have the card encryption applied to one of the interfaces, perhaps it was not copied. Assuming your description you do it, or should it be, applied to the fa0 and you are connected. Try how you ping? Since the router or a device located on E0? If you ping the router, you will need to do an extended ping of E0 to the ip address of the client has been assigned. If your just ping the router without the extension, you will get sales and decrypts that you declare on the client. Have you tried to ping from the client to interface E0? Your default route on the router is pointing to fa0? You have a next hop to affect? You have several NIC on the client pc? Turn off your other network cards to check that you don't have a problem with routing on the client if you have more than one.

  Kurtis Durrett

• Problem on site to site and between router vpn client series 2,800

  Hello

  I need a little help.

  I have 2 office of connection with a site to site vpn

  Each site has a dry - k9 router 800 series.

  Each router has actually client ipsec vpn active and all users can connect by using the client vpn with no problems.

  I added the lines for the vpn site to another, but the tunnel is still down.

  Here the sh run and sh encryption session 2 routers:

  OFFICE A

  version 15.3
  horodateurs service debug datetime msec
  Log service timestamps datetime msec
  no password encryption service
  !
  OFFICE-A-DG host name
  !
  boot-start-marker
  boot-end-marker
  !
  AQM-registry-fnf
  !
  !
  AAA new-model
  !
  !
  AAA authentication login default local
  AAA authentication login xauthlist local
  AAA authorization exec default local
  AAA authorization exec vty group xauthlocal
  AAA authorization exec defaultlocal group bdbusers
  AAA authorization groupauthor LAN
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  AAA - the id of the joint session
  !
  Crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-220561722
  enrollment selfsigned
  name of the object cn = IOS - Self - signed - certificate - 220561722
  revocation checking no
  rsakeypair TP-self-signed-220561722
  !
  !
  TP-self-signed-220561722 crypto pki certificate chain
  certificate self-signed 01
    
  quit smoking
  !
  !
  !
  !

  !
  !
  dhcp WIRED IP pool
  Network 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0
  router by default - 10.0.0.254
  Server DNS 10.0.0.100
  !
  !
  !
  8.8.8.8 IP name-server
  no ip cef
  No ipv6 cef
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !

  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  VDSL controller 0
  !
  property intellectual ssh rsa ssh key pair name
  property intellectual ssh version 2
  property intellectual ssh pubkey-string
   
  !
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 3
  BA 3des
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 20
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  OFFICE-B-IP address ISAKMP crypto key XXXXX
  !
  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group remoteusers
  key XXXX
  DNS 10.0.0.100
  WINS 10.0.0.100
  domain.ofc field
  pool ippool
  ACL 101
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac RIGHT
  tunnel mode
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac xauathtransform
  tunnel mode
  !
  !
  !
  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10
  Set transform-set RIGHT
  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 20
  Set transform-set RIGHT
  !
  !
  map clientmap client to authenticate crypto list userathen
  card crypto clientmap isakmp authorization list groupauthor
  client configuration address map clientmap crypto answer
  10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap Dynamics dynmap
  20 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap
  defined OFFICE-B-IP peer
  Set transform-set RIGHT
  match address 115
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  ATM0 interface
  no ip address
  No atm ilmi-keepalive
  PVC 8/35
  aal5mux encapsulation ppp Dialer
  Dialer pool-member 1
  !
  !
  interface Ethernet0
  no ip address
  Shutdown
  !
  interface FastEthernet0
  INTERNAL description
  switchport access vlan 10
  no ip address
  !
  interface FastEthernet1
  no ip address
  Shutdown
  !
  interface FastEthernet2
  switchport access vlan 10
  no ip address
  !
  interface FastEthernet3
  switchport access vlan 10
  no ip address
  !
  interface Vlan1
  no ip address
  Shutdown
  !
  interface Vlan10
  IP 10.0.0.254 255.255.255.0
  IP nat inside
  IP virtual-reassembly in
  !
  interface Dialer0
  the negotiated IP address
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly in
  encapsulation ppp
  Dialer pool 1
  Authentication callin PPP chap Protocol
  PPP pap sent-name of user password xxx xxx 0
  clientmap card crypto
  !
  router RIP
  version 2
  10.0.0.0 network
  network 192.168.1.0
  !
  IP local pool ippool 10.16.20.1 10.16.20.200
  IP forward-Protocol ND
  no ip address of the http server
  no ip http secure server
  !
  !
  the IP nat inside source 1 interface Dialer0 overload list
  overload of IP nat inside source list 101 interface Dialer0
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
  !
  !
  access-list 22 allow 10.16.20.0
  access-list 22 permit 10.16.20.0 0.0.0.255
  Note access-list 101 * ACL SHEEP *.
  access-list 101 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 10.16.20.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 101 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 any
  access-list 115 permit ip 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
  !
  !
  !
  control plan
  !
  !
  !
  MGCP behavior considered range tgcp only
  MGCP comedia-role behavior no
  disable the behavior MGCP comedia-check-media-src
  disable the behavior of MGCP comedia-sdp-force
  !
  profile MGCP default
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  Line con 0
  no activation of the modem
  line to 0
  line vty 0 4
  exec-timeout 0 0
  preferred transport ssh
  transport input telnet ssh
  !
  Scheduler allocate 20000 1000
  !
  end

  OFFICE B

  OFFICE-B-DG host name
  !
  boot-start-marker
  boot-end-marker
  !
  AQM-registry-fnf

  !
  AAA new-model
  !
  !
  AAA authentication login default local
  AAA authentication login xauthlist local
  AAA authorization exec default local
  AAA authorization exec vty group xauthlocal
  AAA authorization exec defaultlocal group bdbusers
  AAA authorization groupauthor LAN
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  AAA - the id of the joint session
  !
  Crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-1514396900
  enrollment selfsigned
  name of the object cn = IOS - Self - signed - certificate - 1514396900
  revocation checking no
  rsakeypair TP-self-signed-1514396900
  !
  !
  TP-self-signed-1514396900 crypto pki certificate chain
  certificate self-signed 01
    
  quit smoking

  !
  !
  8.8.8.8 IP name-server
  no ip cef
  No ipv6 cef
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  license udi pid C887VAM-K9 sn FCZ191362Q7
  !
  !

  !
  !
  !
  !
  VDSL controller 0
  !
  property intellectual ssh rsa SSH key pair name
  !
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 3
  BA 3des
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 20
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  encryption XXXX isakmp key address IP-OFFICE-A

  !
  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group remoteusers
  key xxxx
  DNS 192.168.1.10
  WINS 192.168.1.10
  rete.loc field
  pool ippool
  ACL 101
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac RIGHT
  tunnel mode
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac xauathtransform
  tunnel mode
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp - esp-md5-hmac rtpset
  tunnel mode
  !
  !
  !
  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 10
  Set transform-set RIGHT
  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 20
  Set transform-set RIGHT
  !
  !
  map clientmap client to authenticate crypto list userathen
  card crypto clientmap isakmp authorization list groupauthor
  client configuration address map clientmap crypto answer
  10 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap Dynamics dynmap
  20 ipsec-isakmp crypto map clientmap
  peer IP-OFFICE-A value
  Set transform-set RIGHT
  match address 115
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  interface Loopback1
  no ip address
  !
  ATM0 interface
  no ip address
  No atm ilmi-keepalive
  PVC 8/35
  aal5mux encapsulation ppp Dialer
  Dialer pool-member 1
  !
  !
  interface Ethernet0
  no ip address
  Shutdown
  !
  interface FastEthernet0
  switchport access vlan 30
  no ip address
  !
  interface FastEthernet1
  switchport access vlan 30
  no ip address
  !
  interface FastEthernet2
  switchport access vlan 20
  no ip address
  !
  interface FastEthernet3
  switchport access vlan 10
  no ip address
  !
  interface Vlan1
  no ip address
  Shutdown
  !
  Vlan30 interface
  IP 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0
  IP nat inside
  IP virtual-reassembly in
  !
  interface Dialer0
  the negotiated IP address
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly in
  encapsulation ppp
  Dialer pool 1
  Authentication callin PPP chap Protocol
  PPP pap sent-name to user
  clientmap card crypto
  !
  router RIP
  version 2
  10.0.0.0 network
  network 192.168.1.0
  !
  IP local pool ippool 10.16.20.201 10.16.20.250
  IP forward-Protocol ND
  no ip address of the http server
  no ip http secure server
  !
  !
  the IP nat inside source 1 interface Dialer0 overload list
  overload of IP nat inside source list 101 interface Dialer0
  IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.100 5060 interface Dialer0 5060
  IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.100 5061 interface Dialer0 5061
  IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.100 5062 interface Dialer0 5062
  IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.100 5063 5063 Dialer0 interface
  IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.100 5064 interface Dialer0 5064
  IP nat inside source static udp 192.168.1.100 5060 interface Dialer0 5060
  IP nat inside source static udp 192.168.1.100 5061 interface Dialer0 5061
  IP nat inside source static udp 192.168.1.100 5062 interface Dialer0 5062
  IP nat inside source static udp 192.168.1.100 5063 5063 Dialer0 interface
  IP nat inside source static udp 192.168.1.100 5064 interface Dialer0 5064
  IP nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.100 3541 interface Dialer0 3541
  IP nat inside source static udp 192.168.1.100 3541 interface Dialer0 3541
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer0
  !
  !
  sheep allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 150 101
  !
  access-list 22 allow 10.16.20.0
  access-list 22 permit 10.16.20.0 0.0.0.255
  access list 101 deny ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.16.20.0 0.0.0.255
  ACCESS-list 101 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
  access-list 115 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.0.0.255
  !
  !
  !
  control plan
  !
  !
  !
  MGCP behavior considered range tgcp only
  MGCP comedia-role behavior no
  disable the behavior MGCP comedia-check-media-src
  disable the behavior of MGCP comedia-sdp-force
  !
  profile MGCP default
  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  Line con 0
  no activation of the modem
  line to 0
  line vty 0 4
  exec-timeout 0 0
  password Password02
  preferred transport ssh
  transport input telnet ssh
  !
  Scheduler allocate 20000 1000
  !
  end

  Thanks in advance for any help :)

  the site at the other tunnel is mounted, but it does not pass traffic; What is the source and destination ip on the router that you are trying to ping the address

  whenever you try to open the traffic from router A to router B, you must to the source of the traffic.

  for ex,.

  Router A-->10.1.1.1--fa0/0

  Router B - 172.168.1.100

  source of ping 172.168.1.100 router # 10.1.1.1

  After doing the pings, send the output of the show counterpart of its crypto ipsec at both ends

• Router vpn site to site PIX and vpn client

  I have two on one interface on the pix vpn connections that terminate VPN. client vpn and VPN site-to-site have passed phase one and two and decrypt and encrypt the packets. However as in another post I can not ping through the l2l vpn. I checked this isn't a nat problem a nd two NAT 0 on the pix and the NAT on the router access lists work correctly.

  ISAKMP crypto RTR #show its
  IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association
  status of DST CBC State conn-id slot
  66.x.x.x 89.x.x.x QM_IDLE 2001 0 ACTIVE

  IPv6 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association

  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (192.168.2.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (192.168.10.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
  current_peer 66.x.x.x port 500
  LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},
  #pkts program: 23583, #pkts encrypt: 23583 #pkts digest: 23583
  #pkts decaps: 18236, #pkts decrypt: 18236, #pkts check: 18236
  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
  #pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0
  #pkts not unpacked: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
  #send 40, #recv errors 0

  local crypto endpt. : 89.x.x.x, remote Start crypto. : 66.x.x.x
  Path mtu 1380, ip mtu 1380, ip mtu BID Dialer0
  current outbound SPI: 0xC4BAC5E (206285918)

  SAS of the esp on arrival:
  SPI: 0xD7848FB (225986811)
  transform: aes - esp esp-sha-hmac.
  running parameters = {Tunnel}
  Conn ID: 3, flow_id: Motorola SEC 1.0:3, card crypto: PIX_MAP
  calendar of his: service life remaining (k/s) key: (4573083/78319)
  Size IV: 16 bytes
  support for replay detection: Y
  Status: ACTIVE

  the arrival ah sas:

  SAS of the CFP on arrival:

  outgoing esp sas:
  SPI: 0xC4BAC5E (206285918)
  transform: aes - esp esp-sha-hmac.
  running parameters = {Tunnel}
  Conn ID: 4, flow_id: Motorola SEC 1.0:4, card crypto: PIX_MAP
  calendar of his: service life remaining (k/s) key: (4572001/78319)
  Size IV: 16 bytes
  support for replay detection: Y
  Status: ACTIVE

  outgoing ah sas:

  outgoing CFP sas:

  Expand the IP NAT access list
  10 deny ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 (21396 matches)
  20 permit ip 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255 everything (362 matches)
  Expand the IP VPN_ACCESS access list
  10 permit ip 192.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255 (39724 matches)

  I looked on the internet and that it points to a routing error when packets are being encrypted and decrypted, but you can't do a ping on the binding. However when I test the connection I did not enter any of the static routes that networks are connected directly on each side of the pix and the router. any help would be a preciated as I think there's maybe something is blocking the ping to reach the internal network at the end of pix with a configured access list.

  is ping failure of the only thing between the site to site VPN? and assuming that all other traffic works fine since it decrypts and encrypts the packets.

  If it's just ping, then activate pls what follows on the PIX:

  If it is version 6.3 and below: fixup protocol icmp

  If it is version 7.0 and higher: select "inspect icmp" under your political map of the world.

  Config complete hand and on the other could help determine if it's a configuration problem or another problem.

• Problems to connect via the Cisco VPN client IPSec of for RV180W small business router

  Hello

  I tried to configure my router Cisco of RV180W as a customer VPN IPSec, but have encountered a problem that I hope someone can help me with. "" I managed to do the work of configuration so that the Cisco's VPN IPSec client authenticates successfully with the XAUTH user, I put on the router, but during the negotiation, the client ends with the following, which appears several times on the router error message: ' Mar 20 Oct 19:41:53 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [34360] has no config mode.

  I've read around the internet and a number of people seem to say that the Cisco VPN Client is not compatible with the router, but the same thing happens to my iPhone VPN client.

  Is it possible that this can be implemented? Below, I have attached the full configuration files and the log files. Thank you much in advance.

  Router log file (I changed the IP addresses > respectively as well as references to MAC addresses)

  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: floating ports NAT - T with counterpart > [44074]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: notification to ignore INITIAL-CONTACT > [44074] because it is admitted only after the phase 1.
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload does not match for > [4500]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: NAT - D payload does not match for > [44074]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: received unknown Vendor ID
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: received Vendor ID: CISCO-UNITY
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: NAT detected: is located behind a device. NAT and alsoPeer is behind a NAT device
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: request sending Xauth for > [44074]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:10 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association established for > [4500] -> [44074] with spi =>.
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: receives the type of the attribute 'ISAKMP_CFG_REPLY' of > [44074]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: login successful for the user "myusername".
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: myusername XAuthUser connected from the IP >
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: sending of information Exchange: Notify payload [10381]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: receives the type of the attribute 'ISAKMP_CFG_REQUEST' of > [44074]
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: ignored attribute 5
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: attribute ignored 28683
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no mode config
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] WARNING: attribute ignored 28684
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no config mode
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: local configuration for > [44074] has no mode config
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] ERROR: remove the invalid payload with doi:0.
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: purged-Association of ISAKMP security with proto_id = ISAKMP and spi =>.
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:15 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: myusername XAuthUser Logged Out of the IP >
  Mar 20 Oct 20:03:16 2015 (GMT + 0000): [r1] [IKE] INFO: ISAKMP Security Association deleted for > [4500] -> [44074] with spi =>

  The router configuration

  screen_shot_10-20 - 15_at_09.00_pm.png

  

  IKE policy

  screen_shot_10-20 - 15_at_09.00_pm_001.png

  

  screen_shot_10-20 - 15_at_09.01_pm.png

  

  VPN strategy

  screen_shot_10-20 - 15_at_09.02_pm.png

  

  screen_shot_10-20 - 15_at_09.02_pm_001.png

  

  Client configuration

  Hôte : < router="" ip=""> >

  Authentication group name: remote.com

  Password authentication of the Group: mysecretpassword

  Transport: Enable Transparent Tunneling; IPSec over UDP (NAT/PAT)

  Username: myusername

  Password: mypassword

  Please contact Cisco.

  Correct, the RV180 is not compatible with the Cisco VPN Client.  The Iphone uses the Cisco VPN Client.

  You can use the PPTP on the RV180 server to connect a PPTP Client.

  In addition, it RV180 will allow an IPsec connection to third-party customers 3.  Greenbow and Shrew Soft are 2 commonly used clients.

• VPN clients cannot access remote sites - PIX, routing problem?

  I have a problem with routing to remote from our company websites when users connect via their VPN client remotely (i.e. for home workers)

  Our headquarters contains a PIX 515E firewall. A number of remote sites to connect (via ADSL) to head office using IPSEC tunnels, ending the PIX.

  Behind the PIX is a router 7206 with connections to the seat of LANs and connections to a number of ISDN connected remote sites. The default route on 7206 points to the PIX from traffic firewall which sits to ADSL connected remote sites through the PIX. Internal traffic for LAN and ISDN connected sites is done via the 7206.

  Very good and works very well.

  When a user connects remotely using their VPN client (connection is interrupted on the PIX) so that they get an IP address from the pool configured on the PIX and they can access resources located on local networks to the office with no problems.

  However, the problem arises when a remote user wants access to a server located in one of the remote sites ADSL connected - it is impossible to access all these sites.

  On the remote site routers, I configured the access lists to allow access from the pool of IP addresses used by the PIX. But it made no difference. I think that the problem may be the routes configured on the PIX itself, but I don't know what is necessary to solve this problem.

  Does anyone have suggestions on what needs to be done to allow access to remote sites for users connected remotely via VPN?

  (Note: I suggested a workaround, users can use a server on LAN headquarters as a "jump point" to connect to remote servers from there)

  with pix v6, no traffic is allowed to redirect to the same interface.

  for example, a remote user initiates an rdp session for one of the barns adsl. PIX decrypts the packet coming from the external interface and looks at the destination. because the destination is one of adsl sites, pix will have to return traffic to the external interface. Unfortunately, pix v6.x has a limitation that would force the pix to drop the packet.

  with the v7, this restriction has been removed with the "same-security-traffic control intra-interface permits".

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a008046f307.shtml

• SSL VPN and routing problem

  Hi all

  I have a strange architecture including VPN and I have a few problems that I am not able to solve:

  -J' use the ssl vpn gateway to allocate internal IP addresses of the local network described in the schema (8.8.2.0 or 8.8.3.0 according to the tunnel-group network.

  -The purpose is for vpn clients directly access the internal network.

  This works very well if there are strictly internal communications within the network. But recently, we have installed an application that needs to access both networks. No problem, I thought, but I was wrong, there seems to be a problem of routing inherent in the architecture in place.

  Let me explain the problem:

  -When I access the VPN, for example I will gave the 8.8.3.5 ip address.

  -Im running the application that needs to open a page on the web server, located at 8.8.2.120

  -l'asa receive my tcp syn datagram and forward it directly to the directly connected interface fa0/1 (based on the routing table)

  -the web server returns the response, but he sends on its default gateway which is the cisco 6509.

  -6509 it sends its vlan svi 2000

  - and finally the ASA it receives on its interface fa0/2 but seems he falls as she opened a tcp on fa0/1 connection and receives the response on fa0/2.

  I want it's traffic by tunnel to bypass the connected roads and transmit it to a default gateway of tunnel. This would ensure that the path for the request and the response would be the same.

  I would like to know if there are orders of debugging for routing decisions validate my theory?

  Do you know of any response to solve this problem?

  Thanks a lot for your help.

  When you configure the TCP State derivation always think ' which way is the SYN package coming?

  Routing failed messages always have source and destination, are of course copied the entire message?

  BTW, instead of letting clients SSL addresses attributed to vlan2000? Why not give them a separate subnet and the road back via correct interface?

  I would also check your config and the routing :-) table

  Marcin

• Have problems with the IPSec VPN Client and several target networks

  I use an ASA 5520 8.2 (4) running.

  My goal is to get a VPN client to access more than one network within the network, for example, I need VPN client IPSec and power establish tcp connections on servers to 192.168.210.x and 10.21.9.x and 10.21.3.x

  I think I'm close to having this resolved, but seems to have a routing problem. Which I think is relevant include:

  Net1: 192.168.210.0/32

  NET2: 10.21.0.0/16

  NET2 has several subnets defined VIRTUAL local network:

  DeviceManagement (vlan91): 10.21.9.0/32

  Servers (vlan31): 10.21.3.0/32

  # See the road

  Code: C - connected, S - static, RIP, M - mobile - IGRP, R - I, B - BGP

  D - EIGRP, OSPF, IA - external EIGRP, O - EX - OSPF inter zone

  N1 - type external OSPF NSSA 1, N2 - type external OSPF NSSA 2

  E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - external OSPF of type 2, E - EGP

  i - IS - L1 - IS - IS level 1, L2 - IS - IS IS level 2, AI - IS inter zone

  * - candidate by default, U - static route by user, o - ODR

  P periodical downloaded static route

  Gateway of last resort is x.x.x.x network 0.0.0.0

  C 192.168.210.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected to the inside

  C 216.185.85.92 255.255.255.252 is directly connected to the outside of the

  C 10.21.9.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected, DeviceManagement

  C 10.21.3.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected, servers

  S * 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [1/0] via x.x.x.x, outdoor

  I can communicate freely between all networks from the inside.

  interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  Description * INTERNAL NETWORK *.

  Speed 1000

  full duplex

  nameif inside

  security-level 100

  IP 192.168.210.1 255.255.255.0

  OSPF hello-interval 2

  OSPF dead-interval 7

  !

  interface Redundant1.31

  VLAN 31

  nameif servers

  security-level 100

  IP 10.21.3.1 255.255.255.0

  !

  interface Redundant1.91

  VLAN 91

  nameif DeviceManagement

  security-level 100

  IP 10.21.9.1 255.255.255.0

  permit same-security-traffic inter-interface

  NO_NAT list of allowed ip extended access all 172.31.255.0 255.255.255.0

  IP local pool vpnpool 172.31.255.1 - 172.31.255.254 mask 255.255.255.0

  Overall 101 (external) interface

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access NO_NAT

  NAT (inside) 101 192.168.210.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (servers) 101 10.21.3.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (DeviceManagement) 101 10.21.9.0 255.255.255.0

  static (inside, DeviceManagement) 192.168.210.0 192.168.210.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  static (inside, servers) 192.168.210.0 192.168.210.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  static (servers, upside down) 10.21.3.0 10.21.3.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  static (DeviceManagement, upside down) 10.21.9.0 10.21.9.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  access list IN LAN extended permitted tcp 192.168.210.0 255.255.255.0 any

  access list IN LAN extended permit udp 192.168.210.0 255.255.255.0 any

  LAN-IN scope ip 192.168.210.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 any

  LAN-IN extended access list allow icmp 192.168.210.0 255.255.255.0 any

  access list IN LAN extended permitted tcp 10.21.0.0 255.255.0.0 any

  access list IN LAN extended permitted udp 10.21.0.0 255.255.0.0 any

  LAN-IN scope 10.21.0.0 ip access list allow 255.255.0.0 any

  LAN-IN extended access list allow icmp 10.21.0.0 255.255.0.0 any

  standard access list permits 192.168.210.0 SPLIT-TUNNEL 255.255.255.0

  standard access list permits 10.21.0.0 SPLIT-TUNNEL 255.255.0.0

  group-access LAN-IN in the interface inside

  internal VPNUSERS group policy

  attributes of the VPNUSERS group policy

  value of server DNS 216.185.64.6

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  Split-tunnel-network-list value of SPLIT TUNNEL

  field default value internal - Network.com

  type VPNUSERS tunnel-group remote access

  tunnel-group VPNUSERS General attributes

  address vpnpool pool

  strategy-group-by default VPNUSERS

  tunnel-group VPNUSERS ipsec-attributes

  pre-shared key *.

  When a user establishes a VPN connection, their local routing tables have routes through the tunnel to the 10.21.0.0/16 and the 192.168.210.0/32.

  They are only able to communicate with the network 192.168.210.0/32, however.

  I tried to add the following, but it does not help:

  router ospf 1000

  router ID - 192.168.210.1

  Network 10.21.0.0 255.255.0.0 area 1

  network 192.168.210.0 255.255.255.252 area 0

  area 1

  Can anyone help me please with this problem? There could be a bunch of superfluous things here, and if you could show me, too, I'd be very happy. If you need more information on the config, I'll be happy to provide.

  Hello Kenneth,

  Based on the appliance's routing table, I can see the following

  C 10.21.9.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected, DeviceManagement

  C 10.21.3.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected, servers

  C 192.168.210.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected to the inside

  And you try to connect to the 3 of them.

  Politics of Split tunnel is very good, the VPN configuration is fine

  The problem is here

  NO_NAT list of allowed ip extended access all 172.31.255.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access NO_NAT

  Dude, you point to just inside interface and 2 other subnets are on the device management interface and the interface of servers... That is the question

  Now how to solve

  NO_NAT ip 192.168.210.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 172.31.255.0 255.255.255.0

  no access list NO_NAT extended permits all ip 172.31.255.0 255.255.255.0

  NO_NAT_SERVERS ip 10.21.3.0 access list allow 255.255.255.0 172.31.255.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (SERVERS) 0 ACCESS-LIST NO_NAT_SERVERS

  Permit access-list no.-NAT_DEVICEMANAGMENT ip 10.21.9.0 255.255.255.0 172.31.255.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (deviceManagment) 0-no.-NAT_DEVICEMANAGMENT access list

  Any other questions... Sure... Be sure to note all my answers.

  Julio

• Problem with the Cisco VPN and Vista client

  Hello

  I have an easy VPN server configured on a c2811 and users use the Cisco VPN client. Lately, I have users running Windows Vista 64 bit and I need to know what is the correct version of the vpn client, I have to use and the compatibility problems with the server, I configured.

  Thank you and best regards.

  Cisco VPN Client doesn't have any version that is compatible with Vista 64 bit OS. The only customer that Cisco has released that supports the 64 bit OS's AnyConnect, but it is only supported on the CISCO ASA Appliance