Standard network config switch

Similar Questions

• Standard network naming

  [I have three hosts \[vm01, vm02, vm03\] in a single cluster \[CL01\]. On each host, I have a virtual switch with two standard networks - one for mgmt and a single port group. On dv01, I named these VM01Network and VM01MgmtNetwork. VM02 and 03, I simply changed the numbers in the names to match. Therefore, each host has two networks and the cluster has three networks port group... VM01Network VM02Network and VM03Network - in other words, each host has a different virtual network name...

  Is this properly configured? I intend using FT and HA. Do I need all these names are the same? Is what makes them different better? TO be clear, if you look at a map of the cluster you see three unconnected cards.

  The names MUST be the same for vMotion (and I guess) FT to work.  This is because the name is what the NETWORK card in the VM properties is related to.  When the virtual machine is moving to a different host, he finds the correct port group by matching the name.

  Virtualization of happy!

  JP

  Please consider awarding points for correct or helpful answers

• difference between standard and disturbed switch

  What is the difference between standard and disturbed switch?

  What is locate these files confutation.

  Hi friend

  See below blogs:Difference is very well explained

  http://www.vmwarearena.com/2014/01/vSphere-distributed-switch-part-3.html

  http://www.tech-tap.com/2009/05/30/differences-between-vSwitches-and-dvswitches/

• Virtual network config

  How set up my network LM4 using a closed network and not change the IP address of the virtual machine?

  The physical network config is pretty simple, and I can create a fence where the virtual machine gets a new IP address of the static pool, but I can't work on the creation of a fence without impacting on IP of the virtual machine.

  This should be a common configuration, but it seems to me to miss something.

  You can configure the VM with static IP address.

  StarWind Software R & D

• Migrate standard network switch to VDS

  Hello

  I intend to migrate little my clusters that are running in a standard switch to DVS. Need help to automate this process.

  My scenario is:

  In a 15cluster environment are present 5 are already running in DVS
  but 10 clusters are still a standard switch so I need to migrate the
  already existing DVSwitch.

  By taking a cluster of 10node as an example.
  (1) mgmt and vmkernel are on a vswitch (ex: vswitch 0)
  [vswitch 0 - connected with 2 vmincs]

  (2) virtual machine in a vswitch portgroup (Ex: vswitch 1)
  [vswitch 1 - connected with 2 vmincs]

  On all groups, we need to migrate only machine virtual portgroup
  or vmnetwork (ex: vswitch 1) to off-network vmkernel mgmt DVs.
  My plan:
  First add all cluster hosts to DVswitch
  Remove all a redundant vmnic (ex: vmnic3) connected to the machine virtual portgroup. (Ex: vswitch) 1 and adds it to DVswitch.
  Now migrate all virtual machines connected to a standard switch to dvs. (Here I hit)
  Is it possible if VLAN 10 (standard switch) then consists of 5 virtual machines
  check the VLAN 10 DVS and portgroup network set to 10 VLAN adapter on the
  SMV (I mean can we compare VLAN ID on VSS and VDS and inspiring than us)
  need to migrate virtual machines to a DVS.)

  As below:

  

  
  If it works correctly then you have to check the State of all virtual machines (ignore power VM off) ping
  If ok then proceed to map the second network card (ex: vmnic4) VSS for VDS.

  Use the Script:

  # ESXi hosts to migrate from VSS to VDS
  $vmhost_array = @("host1","host2")
  # Adding Hosts to existing VDswitch
  $vds = Get-VDSwitch -Name "SM_UAT"
  foreach ($vmhost in $vmhost_array) {
  # Add ESXi host to VDS
  Write-Host "Adding" $vmhost "to" $vds_name
  $vds | Add-VDSwitchVMHost -VMHost $vmhost | Out-Null
  # Migrate pNICs to VDS
  Write-Host "Adding vmnic2 to" $vds
  $vmhostNetworkAdapter = Get-VMHost $vmhost |Get-VirtualSwitch -Name "vswitch1" |select -ExpandProperty Nic |select -First 1
  $vds | Add-VDSwitchPhysicalNetworkAdapter -VMHostNetworkAdapter $vmhostNetworkAdapter -Confirm:$false
  # Migrate VMs from VSS to VDS
  Write-Host "migrating vms from VSS to VDS"
  }
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  

  Maybe try like this

  # ESXi hosts to migrate VSS to VDS

  $vmhost_array = get-VMHost-name 10.50.37.31

  # get existing VDswitch

  $vds = get-VDSwitch-name "Pre-production".

  foreach ($vmhost to $vmhost_array)

  {

  # Add ESXi hosts service VDS

  Write-Host-object 'Add' $vmhost 'to' $vds

  $null = $vds |

  Add-VDSwitchVMHost - VMHost $vmhost

  # Natachasery to VDS migration

  Write-Host-object «first extraction vnic connected to vswitch»

  $vmhostNetworkAdapter = get-VMHost $vmhost |

  Get-VirtualSwitch-name "vswitch1 |

  Select-Object - ExpandProperty Nic |

  Select-Object - 1 first

  Write-Host-object "Removing vswitch vnic.

  $vmhost |

  Get-VMHostNetworkAdapter-name $vmhostNetworkAdapter |

  Delete-VirtualSwitchPhysicalNetworkAdapter-confirm: $false

  Write-Host-Object "RΘcupΦre removed vnic in a variable.

  $Phnic = $vmst | Get-VMHostNetworkAdapter-physics - name $vmhostNetworkAdapter

  Write-Host-object "adding vmnic (redundant) to ' $vds

  Add-VDSwitchPhysicalNetworkAdapter - DistributedSwitch $vds - VMHostPhysicalNic $Phnic - confirm: $false

  # Migrate virtual machines from VSS for VDS

  Write-Host-Object «RΘcupΦre virtualPortgroup vswitch info»

  $vssPG1 = $vmhost | Get-VirtualPortGroup - VirtualSwitch "vswitch1.

  Write-Host-object "migration of VSS for VDS vms."

  foreach ($vssPG to $vssPG1)

  {

  $dvsPG = $vds |

  Get-VDPortgroup |

  Where-Object - FilterScript {}

  $_. ExtensionData.Config.DefaultPortConfig.Vlan.VlanId - eq $vssPG.VlanId

  }

  $vmhost |

  Get - VM |

  Get-NetworkAdapter |

  Where-Object - FilterScript {}

  $_.NetworkName - eq $vssPG.Name

  } | Together-NetworkAdapter NetworkName - $dvsPG.Name - confirm: $false

  }

• REQUIRED: ISE 1.1.3 Posture Setup and Config Switch (ACL, dACL)

  Hello

  anyone could please posture ISE configuration screenshot (and sanitation)

  I need urgently a DACL and a redirect ACL who work at least in a laboratory of the model.

  Political authentication and authorization is not necessary.

  policies of posture and sanitation is not necessary.

  The question is ACLs (I guess)

  It must be a valid switch configuration file, with ACL (if necessary) an ethernet DOT1x port.

  My IOS is 122.55 SE or 52 SE

  Thank you in advance.

  Best regards.

  C.

  ACL to redirect the URL on the access switch

  access # conf taccess (config) #-access ip extended ACL-POSTURE-REDIRECT list

  Access (config-ext-NaCl) # deny udp any any eq field

  Access (config-ext-NaCl) # deny udp any host <> eq 8905

  Access (config-ext-NaCl) # deny udp any host <> eq 8906

  Access(config-ext-NaCl) # tcp refuse any host <> eq 8443

  Access(config-ext-NaCl) # tcp refuse any host <> eq 8905

  Access(config-ext-NaCl) # tcp refuse any host <> eq www

  Access (NaCl-ext-config) # ip allow a whole

  Access (config-ext-nacl

  a DACL that restricts access to the network of endpoints that do not conform to posture.

  Name

  POSTURE_REMEDIATION

  Description

  Allow access to the posture and rehabilitation services and prohibits any access. General http and https for redirection only permits.

  Content of the DACL

  allow udp any any eq field

  allow icmp a whole

  allow any host tcp <> eq 8443

  Ermit tcp any any eq 80

  permit any any eq 443 tcp

  allow any host tcp <> eq 8905

  allow any host udp <> eq 8905

  allow any host udp <> 1 eq 8906

  allow any host tcp <> eq 80

• Consulta mejor opcion para configurar networking "virtual Switch".

  Hola todos espero esten very well...

  Tengo una consulta tengo q instalar 4 ESXI vphere 4.5 en mi granja servidores para el cual tengo q hacer ESXI a cluster are q el material nuevo are muy diferente al los servidores ago instalados.

  Tengo una consulta con respecto a part of networking

  nosotros tenemos currently assigned a con x amount of vmnic virtual switch a virtual swicht este para los servidores in una vlan especifica

  Office of y tambien tenemos otro con virtual switch x amount of vmnic para our Máquinas, o sea maquinas office q usan como desktop users con otro vlan especifica

  hace poco lei q best practices keep comunicación en esta era una en UN virtual switch solo?

  Partamos respond as las best no son solo eso practices, good practices there no estan en piedra, por cada uno debe set so what requested una best practice in particular to asil o has nuestro stage o an our needs.

  Dejando en esto claro, you have several options, partiendo por the config as you currently have there than in any caso esta mala.

  Según lo than tiendo tienes 2 vSwitch, uno para servidores office y otro para escritorios office, con cada vSwitch a number x of physical NICS.  Esta config you permite urban el trafico ambos types for office, asegurando además cierto nivel redundancia the conexion en Máquinas.

  Otra opcion, works that you are using VLAN, you have a vSwitch solo con todas las NIC that usan los 2 vSwitch configurados currently.  In unico vSwitch puedes crear este 2 exchanges, cada uno con una VLAN para urban el trafico las maquinas office, para lo cual las NIC physical deben estar his in modo los fisicos, pasando both switches trunk VLAN.  Esta config you permite una mayor red redundancia marine y ancho Mayor of banda, use todas las are for VLAN cada that could cards available for en el vSwitch network.

  Both options igual son of validas y lo you depende Niños y como are the Red architecture of you plataforma.

  Saludos!

• standard of distributed switch migration oddities

  I have recently updated our laboratory to vsphere 5 and then switches distributed, after the migration of VM networks I noticed two machines still show an idle connection to the old standard switch this switch and portgroup be deleted on all host servers:

  

  I tried to remove the network card and it time on the removing of the inventory, virtual machine and re-adding it... any ideas on how to get rid of this?

  Usually, it shows if the virtual machine has a snapshot, which was connected to the Group of 'old' port

  André

• Virtual Switch Standard virtual Distributed Switch migration / a physical Uplinku

  Hello community,

  My ESXI 4.1 hostmachines are configured with virtual standard switches as follows:

  -1 xGbit public - network VMKERNEL management

  -2 x Gbit/active - VMotion + pi (VMKERNEL)

  -2 x Gbit/active - storage NAS (VMKERNEL)

  -2 x Gbit/active - VM LAN

  I want to migrate to a distributed virtual switch, but Ami don't know if it's possible. The problem is I onlyy a uplink public and I can't add the physical NIC as the standard switch and distributed virtual switch. IAM looking for a way to migrate the portgroup & physical uplink NIC in one step. Someone knows how to do this without adding a second NIC uplink? Please keep in mind that my vCenter is a virtual machine on this machine.

  Thanks in advance,

  Stephan

  Another person asked a similar question in which I looked at How to migrate from a vSwitch to the switch distributed - see if that answers your question.

• Virtual network and switch Option grayed out?

  I have two hosts on my environment, clustered. Web client (using Vsphere 5.5), I choose a host-> manage-> virtual switches, but all the options are greyed out (add host network, refresh the network hosts, manage physical network cards, etc.). I go to another host and choose the same thing, and these options are available. I don't know why this is happening? I have googled around, but can't find anything useful.

  You can do it in vSphere Client Host? Sometimes the Web client takes forever to load the icons change to the virtual switches.

  Maybe you should give the vCenter, a little more RAM and the Java process Web client as well.

  See a good explanation on how to increase Java memory for customer Web here: Improve vSphere Web Client Performance. Tom Fojta & #039; s Blog

• New to VM, network config question

  I have a question with networking on a virtual machine host. IM pretty new MV so forgive me if this is a stupid question or if its in the wrong forum.

  I have a single host VM with ESXi 5 turn several Win2008 server. The physical network switch is a 48-Port 10/100 but a 2 gigabit ports. The physical host has 4 gigabit NIC. Is it better to launch 4 NICs to 100 MB/s or two Gigabit? What happened to run 2 network cards in each (2 gigabytes) and 2 in 100? How do I configure?

  Im just trying to see what options are avilable for me with this and what is the preferred configuration.

  Thank you!

  So you can plug them into the ports of 1 GB as if you don't need all the traffic flowing on routes rising 1 GB and host to the same new host which will be at least 1 GB speed.

  Your army to the workstation traffic will flow to 100 MB max.

  Personally, I would look to pick up a new switch if budgets permit.  You can get a switch 48-Port gigabit for £180 all about, or if you do not use the 48-port you can get a smaller much cheaper.

  Kind regards

  Simon Greaves

  www.simongreaves.co.UK

• vNetwork Standard Configuration of switch

  Hello

  We have 3 guests ESXi 5.0.

  I configured the network as below that we have only 4 NICs per host;

  All the IPS below are in a VLAN. And what a vlan is configured on a physical switch.

  ESXi 5.0

  vSwitch0

  The VM network

  Networking - same vlan ip

  VMkernel_vMotion - same vlan ip

  2 NICs (active/active)

  vSwitch1

  VMkernal_iSCSI - same ip vlan (our IP storage is a different subnet, but it can communicate with the ip subnet of vlan.) This is when the creation of this port, there is no option to 'check' designed to 'storage', then how iSCSI traffic will pass through this port ONLY?

  2 NICs (active/active)

  I want to know if this configuration is ok?

  OR

  Suggest me a better option than this.

  Thank you

  Mihir

  Easy answer. You don't assign it a gateway to VMkernel iSCSI ports. If you use IP addresses in the same subnet as the storage system, you don't need a gateway. VMware does not support iSCSI traffic routed anyway.

  Now that you have found a VLAN / subnet dedicated to iSCSI traffic, I suggest you research a little more, maybe you are lucky enough to find a dedicated VLAN / subnet for vMotion too.

  André

• Still no network config tool for Linux?

  It doesn't seem to be a Player 3.1 + to Linux network configuration tool.  I've seen several threads referencing this need (or rather than the tool is now missing but once existed).  The last comment (question) on this subject was in May 2010.

  I realize that player account is free, so I don't expect VMware's priority attention; However, if it is not resolved, I, like others, go out and examine options not VMware for virtualization in Linux.  But since the construction of a very effective, data center performance on ESX a few years ago, I was a fan of VMware products.

  Why are there no network - vmware-config.pl more?

  Thank you very much!

  Michael

  Do not know why the vmnetcfg tool has been removed in VMplayer 3

  For now, you can use this nasty workaround:

  Uninstall vmplayer

  Download the last workstation - full version

  Install it

  run without license

  This may block the virtual machines running via the vmware.exe - GUI, but it will allow the use of vmplayer

  and this time, the tools, the required as vmnetcfg and vdiskmanager module are installed and working

  Edit: the red text added to Woody

  _________________________

  VMX-settings- WS FAQ -[MOAcd | http://sanbarrow.com/moa241.html]- VMDK-manual

• Help with my VMWare network config

  Hey guys, I hope a quick fix, he drove me a little crazy however.

  Host IP Info:

  Ethernet connection to the network space 2: (dynamically assigned IP of my router on IP 192.168.1.1)

  IPv4 address: 192.168.1.21 (Preferred)

  ... Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0.

  Lease obtained...: October 18, 2009 07:58:31

  End of the lease...: October 19, 2009 19:58:30

  ... Default gateway. : 192.168.1.1.

  DHCP server...: 192.168.1.1.

  DNS servers...: 192.168.1.1.

  In VMWare workstation, I have two clients configured as follows:

  Server 2008 R2 Enterprise - DC/DNS/DHCP:

  Ethernet connection to the Local network card: (bridged with assigned statically IP)

  IPv4 address: 192.168.1.100 (Preferred)

  ... Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0.

  ... Default gateway. : 192.168.1.1.

  DNS servers:: 1

  127.0.0.1

  Ethernet connection to the network space 2: (team LAN 1 with statically assigned IP)

  IPv4 address...: 10.44.1.1 (Preferred)

  ... Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0.

  ... Default gateway. :

  DNS servers...: 127.0.0.1.

  Windows Vista client:

  Ethernet connection to the Local network card: (team Lan 1 with dynamic IP address gets DC DHCP information)

  IPv4 address...: 10.44.1.100 (Preferred)

  ... Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0.

  Lease obtained...: October 18, 2009 22:07:13

  End of the lease...: October 26, 2009 22:07:13

  ... Default gateway. : 10.44.1.1.

  DHCP server...: 10.44.1.1.

  DNS servers...: 10.44.1.1.

  Basically, with connections team LAN 1, I can get all my guests talking to eachother with gusto, but only Server 2008 DC has an Internet connection, it is obviously because it's fill my connection to hosts where the my Vista client simply connects on the same LAN to team as the domain controller. How can I get the internet to work on my guests without messing up my team LAN config that works perfectly bar the Internet connection? Do I need to add another network adapter to my clients?

  See you soon,.

  Chris

  ChrisMerritt wrote:

  If you need anything any other made me know

  Coffee would be nice

  Please can you advise how can I do to configure the domain controller to act as a router? If you see the config network/IP for the Vista computer, you can see that it already uses the DC Team LAN (10.44.1.1) as the default gateway but this alone does not seem to work

  You must install the 'Routing and RAS"on the domain controller (which is a component of Windows Server software) and configure it as a router... I'll check for a link on how to do it. Install the software in the meantime...

  I configured by DNS on the domain controller to transmit to my default gateway for anything he cannot solve, this is going to 192.168.1.1

  Good! This is necessary for DNS queries to resolve. As the DNS server works as a DNS proxy service you don't need a router for DNS (but for the rest).

  AWo

  VCP / VMware vEXPERT 2009

  = Due to a lack of employees, human beings humans are working here. -Treat it with care, they are rare. =

• Segments of network &amp; virtual switches

  Hello. I have a question on the Association of the physical NIC ports to a virtual switch.                                                                                I have two network segments. The first has a group of VLAN ID. The second has a network isolated from the VLAN ID to evoke. Can I combine the physical NETWORK adapter ports that are connected by physical switches on the two network segments, on the same virtual switch defined in VMware ESX 3.5 / vSphere? I guess I'd better associate the two network segments with two virtual switches, but I'd like to hear from you.

  Thanks in advance for your help

  If you cannot physically route between the two segments then you can create exchanges on a vswitch and have dedicated NICs for each group of ports and plug the network adapters in the relevant physical switches that connect to network segments or if total isolation is necessary, then create a separate vswitch and do the same thing...