Support TLS 1.2 in 27 FF (Bug 861266) NIST 800 - 131 bis is consistent?

Similar Questions

• Support TLS 1.2 Air Desktop Version-Flex SDK 4.5.1

  Hi all

  I'm new to this forum. I'm working on the desktop air application. recently of Salesforce announced we'll disable the TLS 1.0 since their servers and they will support the TLS Protocol 1.1,1.2. Here is test url that we can use to test in the Office of the air: https://tls1test.salesforce.com/s/. I went through some of the messages in this forum and have not found similar post about this issue. I found one, but it did not help either: done FLEX and AIR support TLS 1.1 + encryption?  

  
  

  I wrote the code to verify that the url below. SecureSocket connection is successful. but UrlRequest is a failure, because it uses TLS 1.0 version to connect to the server, since Air app uses the TLS 1.0, the handshake protocol is a failure. I found this info in wireshark: TLSv1 Record Layer: alert (level: Fatal, Description: failure of the handshake)

  

  My goal is to spend my desktop client to support TLS 1.2 Protocol. I use the version of the Flex SDK 4.5.1 to build the application. Can you please help me understand this issue?

  1. Is there anyway to set the version of the Protocol TLS for UrlLoader and UrlRequest?
  2. I need a client certificate to authenticate with the server for TLS 1.2 Protocol?
  3. This will work if the upgrade from Flex and Air SDKS, I tried, it doesn't work, but do not know what I have tried is correct or not?

  Import flash.display.Sprite;

  Import flash.events. *;

  Import flash.net.URLLoader;

  Import flash.net.URLRequest;

  Import flash.net.URLRequestDefaults;

  Import flash.net.URLRequestHeader;

  Import flash.net.URLRequestMethod;

  import flash.net.URLVariables;

  private function {URLRequestHeaderExample()}

  var loader: URLLoader = new URLLoader();

  loader.dataFormat = pouvez;

  configureListeners (loader);

  SecureSocketExample();

  var header: URLRequestHeader = new URLRequestHeader ('Permission', ' sampleToken');

  var request: URLRequest = new URLRequest ("""https://tls1test.salesforce.com/services/oauth2/token"""); / /https://tls1test.salesforce.com/

  //request.data = new URLVariables ("name = John + Doe");

  Request.Method = URLRequestMethod.GET;

  URLRequestDefaults.idleTimeout = 1200000;

  request.requestHeaders.push (header);

  try {

  Loader.Load (request);

  } catch (error: Error) {}

  trace() "Unable to load the document asked." );

  }

  }

  private function configureListeners(dispatcher:IEventDispatcher):void {}

  dispatcher.addEventListener (Event.COMPLETE, completeHandler);

  dispatcher.addEventListener (Event.OPEN, openHandler);

  dispatcher.addEventListener (ProgressEvent.PROGRESS, progressHandler);

  dispatcher.addEventListener (HTTPStatusEvent.HTTP_STATUS, httpStatusHandler);

  dispatcher.addEventListener (SecurityErrorEvent.SECURITY_ERROR, securityErrorHandler);

  dispatcher.addEventListener (HTTPStatusEvent.HTTP_STATUS, httpStatusHandler);

  dispatcher.addEventListener (IOErrorEvent.IO_ERROR, ioErrorHandler);

  dispatcher.addEventListener (HTTPStatusEvent.HTTP_RESPONSE_STATUS, httpRespoStatusHandler);

  }

  private function completeHandler(event:Event):void {}

  var loader: URLLoader = URLLoader (event.target);

  trace ("completeHandler:" + loader.data "');

  }

  private function openHandler(event:Event):void {}

  trace ("openHandler:" + event "");

  }

  private function progressHandler(event:ProgressEvent):void {}

  trace ("progressHandler loaded:" + event.bytesLoaded + "total:" + event.bytesTotal);

  }

  private function securityErrorHandler(event:SecurityErrorEvent):void {}

  trace()"securityErrorHandler:" ( + event); "."

  }

  private function httpStatusHandler(event:HTTPStatusEvent):void {}

  trace()"httpStatusHandler:" ( + event); "."

  }

  private function httpRespoStatusHandler(event:HTTPStatusEvent):void {}

  trace()"httpRespoStatusHandler:" ( + event); "."

  }

  private function ioErrorHandler(event:IOErrorEvent):void {}

  trace()"ioErrorHandler:" ( + event); "."

  }

  private var secureSocket:SecureSocket = new SecureSocket();

  private function SecureSocketExample()

  {

  secureSocket.addEventListener (Event.CONNECT, onConnect)

  secureSocket.addEventListener (IOErrorEvent.IO_ERROR, onError);

  try

  {

  secureSocket.connect ( "tls1test.salesforce.com", 443);

  }

  catch (error: error)

  {

  trace (Error.ToString);

  }

  }

  private function onConnect (event: Event):void

  {

  trace() "connected". );

  secureSocket.close ();

  }

  private function onError (error: IOErrorEvent):void

  {

  trace (error.text + "," + secureSocket.serverCertificateStatus);

  }

  []] >

  @kumarkasimala

  Our quality assurance team has been able to reproduce this problem.  We consider you cela a bug and will start working on fixing it for a future release.  Our internal bug for this number is 4095988 in case you need to reference it later.

  Thank you

  Chris

• No support TLS with comprehensive anti-spam Service?

  I have a NSA240 (SonicOS Enhanced 5.9) with the active anti-spam service.

  The question I have now, that all E-Mail traffic to the firewall is done without active TLS.

  Can you please tell me if this Service is not supported TLS or how I can enable.

  The smtp test reports the following:

  [000.171]		Connected to the server
  [000.657]	<>	mia0vm - cass04.colo.sonicwall.com 220 ESMTP SonicWALL (8.0.1.2353)
  [000.657]		We are allowed to connect
  [000.658]	-->	EHLO checktls.com
  [001.642]	<>	250 mia0vm - cass04.colo.sonicwall.com 250 8BITMIME 250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES 250 100000000 SIZE
  [001.642]		We can use this server
  [001.643]		TLS is not an option on this server

  I suggest you ask your sales representative to open a feature request for the ability to support TLS with CASS.

  One thing you could do is ask your representative to sales for the free trial Email Security Virtual Appliance or software Windows.

  It is much more robust and supports TLS.

• Support TLS 1.2 SQL 2008 R2

  To the right:

  I have read a document (https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3135244#bookmark-clientdl) to discuss support TLS 1.2 on SQL server 2008 R2.

  I followed the steps described in the document to download and install a hotfix for SQL server service 2008 R2 3. In addition, added the required registry keys values.

  However, I have no way to confirm that SQL server 2008 R2 actually uses TLS 1.2 to communicate with a client.

  Could you please tell me how to check whether or not SQL server 2008 R2 actually uses TLS 1.2 to communicate with a customer.

  Kind regards

  Jason

  Hello

  Run the following query to check the requests of the customers are under encryption:

  Select * from sys.dm_exec_connections where encrypt_option = 'TRUE '.

  Furthermore, let me recommend the following forum for SQL Server issues:

  https://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/SQLServer/en-us/home?category=SQLServer

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards

  Alberto Morillo
  SQLCoffee.com

• What version of AnyConnect is needed to support TLS v1.2

  I need support TLS v1.2 for PCI compliance. Can anyone confirm which version of AnyConnect is necessary? I can't say if it will support 3.x, or if I need to go to 4.x.

  Thank you

  -mike

  It requires AnyConnect 4.0.00048 or later with ASA 9.3 (2) or later version.

  Reference.

  Quote from the above referenced for AnyConnect 4.0 release notes:

  AnyConnect now supports TLS version 1.2 with the following additional cipher suites:

  • DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256

  • DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256

  • AES256-SHA256

  • AES128-SHA256

  Note	AnyConnect TLS 1.2 requires a secure gateway that also supports TLS 1.2. It is available in version 9.3 (2) of the ASA 5500 - X models.

• That supports the Z3v? How to submit bug reports?

  I love my Z3v, but I met some important bugs with the firmware and software. What is the best way to apply a report and/or characteristic bug?

  Besides, which officially supports the phone?  I tried to report a software bug to Verizon and they directed me to the manufacturer of the phone (Sony).  I then tried to get assistance through Sony and the alleged support rep, because the Z3v is a model specific to Verizon, Verizon could only support me.

  Jean-Claude is correct since the Z3v is one inflated to Z2 made exclusively for Verizon. That comes with all the bloatware of Verizon. Updates the phone yo stand out Verizon, if you need to contact them

• Safari 9.0.3 does support TLS 1.2 or higher?

  After the 30/04/16, contacting an important Government Web site will require browsers with TLS 1.2 or later. Not what Safari 9.0.3 eligible for this requirement?

  For info:

  User: chattphotos

  https://discussions.Apple.com/thread/7299638?start=0&TSTART=0

• BUG? Fireworks to DW CSS not consistent between browsers gradients...?

  Greetings-

  I don't know if this is a bug or what, but after watching one of the roadshow Adobe TV videos, I generated CSS gradients in Fireworks, ALL selected the browser compatible translations provides Fireworks and then copied/pasted the CSS in my web page in Dreamweaver. Looks good in DW - everything seems good... until I have look with Firefox...

  I'm not a rocket scientist, but also not a beginner.

  Basically, that is to say, etc. all work fine EXCEPT Firefox! Firefox retains the color, but distorts the percentage gradient and reverse the angle of the gradient. For example if my gradient goes from dark on top with white on the bottom of a box, it displays all fine in the other browsers, but in Firefox the gradient goes from left to right, Darkness to light...

  And Yes, I promise that I made I CSS Firefox as well as IE, etc. before I worry about you all.

  OH! AND I use the grid of liquid set up in Dreamweaver... cordially.

  Am I missing something?

  What I do need to update manually? (i.e., tie a rope around my waist and head on in the mirror - land of code that are degraded CSS?)

  Is there something in DW to be changed after that the FW CSS is added?

  Thanks a lot for all your help and advice!

  JL

  JLSF45 wrote:

  I don't know if this is a bug or what,.

  Yes, it's a bug in the code that produces Fireworks, not how Firefox handles CSS gradients.

  The reason for the problem is that browsers began to apply CSS gradients as experimental long before the current W3C standardization process. For some reason, all browsers have decided to calculate angles using the system of polar coordinates, in which 0 points of law degrees and angle increasing counterclockwise. This way of measuring angles seems to be common in geometry, but it is not the way most people think of them.

  The most common way to measure angles using the compass system: 0 degrees pointing to the top and angles increase in a clockwise direction. That's how the W3C decided angles must be measured in the CSS. Because 0 degrees in the polar coordinate system is 90 degrees in the standard CSS syntax, angles increase in the opposite direction, the only angle that is identical in the two systems is 45 degrees.

  Unfortunately, those who code Panel Fireworks didn't standard syntax uses different angles, and nobody picked it in beta. The problem has been reported to Adobe, and I thought it will be fixed, but I don't know when.

  Until it's resolved, you must convert the angle in the version without prefix of linear - gradient ().

  • Subtract the angle generated by Fireworks of 360.
  • Add 90

  For example, if the angle generated by Fireworks is 315deg, 360-315 = 45. 90 45 plus 135. Then change the angle in the version without prefix of 135deg.

  IE 10 also uses the standard syntax, so conversion is necessary not only for Firefox, but it will be necessary by all browsers.

  It is a rare case of the value of the prefix specific to the browser is completely different from the standard syntax.

• Not entirely taken TLS supported in Cisco IPS 4240

  I am trying to contact a Cisco IPS 4240 device while having security settings FIPS enabled on the client using SSL. This is not possible because the device does not support TLS extensions in the Client Hello packet (RFC 5746) sent by the client when using TLS (SSL3 and lower are not FIPS compatible). The IDM application that communicates with the device does not send these extensions (im seeing this with WireShark) TLS is able to connect to it.

  Is it possible to provide the 4240 support these TLS extensions?

  This is related to the bugs below.  The original solution will be included in the 7.1.5 release which is preparing to take in charge the platform 4240 among others.  This will allow the Web server IPS to ignore short-term extensions.  The long-term solution will require an update to the Web server so that it is fully compliant with RFC 5746.

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtt18382

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtx43502

  Todd

• Support for blackBerry 10 TLS 1.2 for the brower

  Can we get TLS 1.2 support in the browser? The diagnosis https://www.howsmyssl.com/ site reports the browser as only support TLS 1.0. A number of fixes and features have been added since then.

  Hello

  I can confirm that 10.3.1.1779 has work TLS 1.2, it came with a great update a few months ago.

• How to synchronize the calendar with a caldav server using TLS

  Adding a caldav TLS in the calendar of Firefox 1.3 application server causes an error message ("Ein unbekannter Fehler trat auf" - English translation: "an unknown error has occurred"). Is there support for caldav servers encrypted in Firefox OS? And in case it is taken in charge: How can I get more details about the error happening?

  The I try to sync with the server is https://caldav.messagingengine.com.
  It takes support TLS versions 1.0, 1.1 and 1.2.

  Hi Martin,

  Here is the official response from one of the developers of the calendar:

  • CalDAV is done entirely via http/https and the calendar app is happy to send the xhr on ssl requests if you enter an https url. He is also happy (currently) to send unencrypted http requests although if you give a url for a server that doesn't support ssl. Hope that helps!

  So it seems it should work on a technical level, and that you already add CalDav address in a format "https".

  Are you able to access this calendar normally with other calendar applications? Maybe I need to open a bug for this issue.

  -Ralph

• CSCts83720 - upgrade to TLS 1.1/1.2

  According to the bug report for this, corrected the ASA software versions are different versions of version 100.10 and 100.12. How is what corresponds to the versions of the Software ASA? This is the version 8.x or 9.x?

  ASA 9.3.2 introduce support TLS version 1.2 as a new feature. Please check the new session to feature in the next release note link:
  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/asa93/release/notes/as...

• Understand the evolution of TLS in Firefox 37

  Can someone tell me a document that explains clearly what changes have been made in Firefox 37 regarding the TLS? The only thing I can find in the release notes is "disabled unsecured TLS version relief for the security of the site. I find the reference to a Bugzilla, but there are pages of discussion and no clear statement of what has changed. Many web sites have reported that TLS 1.0 has been disabled by default and we found one of our web sites don't supports TLS 1.0 has been affected, but another one that supports only TLS 1.0 works fine. Thus, it would be useful to find a position authoritative that illuminates so we can solve the problems with Firefox and our applications. Otherwise, the only direction is to use IE. 8 -)

  See also:

  • https://developer.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/releases/36/Site_Compatibility#security
  • https://developer.Mozilla.org/en-us/Firefox/releases/37/Site_Compatibility#security

• How / where to report bugs on Thunderbird?

  I can't find a bug reporting site/contact info. I find only references to community support forums, etc. I found a bug, I want to report, and I guess that Mozilla wants to know about it.

  I found the answer myself, should have been a little more patient...

  Bugs are reported (of course) to:
  https://Bugzilla.Mozilla.org/

  Sorry for the wasted bandwidth.

• Support Bluetooth A2DP

  I tried to connect a Bluetooth (a Nokia BH505) headset to my LG Fireweb. It connects and can make phone calls through the headset, but the music is played using the speaker phone...

  I guess that the A2DP profile is not supported by this phone operating system or if I have a bug? If it is a unsupported feature, when it becomes available, how will I know if my phone will support it?

  Thks!

  A2DP is currently not supported. Here is a list of bugs in which A2DP is being developed:
  
  https://Bugzilla.Mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?QuickSearch=A2DP & list_id = 8410346

  Also, please do not comment on the reports of bugs unless you have important information to provide. For any questions or things can be posted here and relayed here.

  Thank you!