T500 T8700 processor work much faster than on the current of a battery!

Similar Questions

• Responsiveness of Windows XP is much faster than Windows 7

  According to this video

  http://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=Ay-gqx18UTM

  and MY personal experience, the xp desktop responsiveness is so much faster and less glitchy than windows 7 (e.g. open services.msc and play with the window, you will see black borders).

  You guys are going to solve this problem on Windows 8, to finally defeat xp in all aspects?

  Original title: why Microsoft, why?

  I have the same specification as Palcouk outside the video. Mine is a HD4250 integrated ATI and I get the black border.

  It may be safe to pin this one on the video card and drivers reasonbly

  Yes and also view the video uses Win 7, RTM, as in no current.

  I use two operating systems on Dells reasonably comparable...  I would say that in my experience 7 is faster than XP and not at all what I would call "glitch."

• Why disable SuperFetch on ssd, if the RAM is much faster than the ssd?

  Directed by Microsoft that SuperFetch and PreFetch must be disabled, if the OS is installed on an ssd, in accordance with article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2727880. But SuperFetch is used for loading the data components of applications, which were very often used for RAM. Although the ssd is faster that a hard drive is not faster than the RAM. So, I do not understand why Microsoft suggest disabling this feature. The only reason why I want to understand, it's because of a limited RAM. If the RAM is sufficient beyond 6 GB, if we disable SuperFetch, then the boot time and increase the loading time of most used applications. I miss something here?

  The other question is about PreFetch. I feel, maybe wrong, it does the same thing with SuperFetch, with one major difference. It loads all the information data on the ssd or hard drive, instead of the RAM, in order to accelerate the launch of applications and time when the OS is installed on a hard drive to boot. If I'm right, let's disable the PreFetch it stores information for one ssd or hdd, while SuperFetch stores data of RAM information, which is much faster and so it must be enabled if there is a sufficient RAM.

  I look forward to reading the notice of a Microsoft software engineer.

  Hi Leventis,

  Prefetch copies frequently accessed files together into a contiguous on the disk area so that they can be located and loaded more quickly. That it takes a lot of old drives to recover data faster.

  SuperFetch predict what applications you run next and preload all the necessary data in the memory. She has also done that with startup files. And for all the three days he sends a defragmentation command to the OS drive that will cause problems in the SSD drives.

  In traditional hard drives (HDD) data are scattered throughout the disk, so that the operating system for access, it will take more time. It is suggested to perform a disk defragmentation. But storage technology is different in SSD, where, it records the data dynamically and it recovers more quickly. Who will be low down the burden on the RAM and the RAM can be used for uses such as for the opening of the games graphics high-end, etc..

  Hope this information is useful.

• Fonts: Selfhosting or Google much faster than Typekit/Edge?

  It is much faster font free host or use Google instead of Typkit fonts?

  I did a test by myself: my website http://DAS-werbeatelier.de now (since yesterday) use "Lato" Edge-Webfont.

  I m sure, this isn't the right way to test, but I took 'Google Page speed Insight' with a result of 47 (mobile) (bad) and 58 (desktop).

  Before yesterday the same website also used Lato - but as police auto-hébergées on my server.

  The result of speed Page was: 51 (mobile) and 64 (desktop).

  That's a significant difference - and it seems to be known.

  https://www.keycdn.com/blog/Web-font-performance/

  If this can be true? This means that, if you want a really fast site (-muse), Don t use Typekit oder Edge-Fonts?

  On the other hand, it is very convenient to use Typekit/Edge with Adobe Muse...

  I understand. 2 seconds "before opening" kill really!

  Have you tried to pass on the new option I mentioned above?

• Calc Dynamics Processor cannot allocate more than 350 the heap block of

  Dear users of Essbase,

  I am trying to implement some logic in order to get my calc done by dynamic calc and formula on members.

  My dynamic member calc with formula is not limited to offsetting the conditional statement to the role of alternative only, I see no problem.

  But in order to get the correct result, I include under condition ISMBR statement and restrict level 0 patch replacement on a sparse Member, I get this ' error Essbase (10127000): dynamic calc processor cannot allocate more than the blocks [350] from the jump. The parameter CalcLockBlock is too low or the size of data cache setting is too low. Increase the setting of the CalcLockBlock or the size of data cache setting and then try again '

  IF (@ISMBR (@RELATIVE("ALTERNATIVEROLLUP",0)))

  IF (@ISUDA ("SCENARIO", "XXX"))

  do something...

  ENDIF

  ENDIF

  I looked through this forum and tried to fix my problem in making changes on Essbase.cfg of DATACACHESIZE and DATAFILECACHESIZE values.

  I also checked in the settings of CALCLOCKBLOCK and the error message shows his tent to allocate more than the default value no. blocks that is 350 blocks in my tests.

  I have CALCLOCKBLOCK with HIGH as 4900, settings default than 350. Hope this is good enough.

  As it is on the dynamic calc and formula approach based on, would like to know how to face this question set.

  If you have encountered this problem would like to take suggestions. Thank you.

  Kind regards

  Praveen

  Of course, JM, it was my test script.

  I would like to change my script to be the best :-).

  And I could get rid of the Essbase error in improving more all hides and CALCLOCKBLOCK parameters.

  The operating current system cann't be changed to try chaning type of dimension and other changes required for the TBLAST property. It is one of the obligation that I work. Then try my best to correct and come out with the best solution.

  It is easy to build the new app with fresh demands to try to include new features to the existing system.

  Thanks a ton for your time and your suggestions.

• Playback of a view is much slower than reading the table

  Hello
  
  I use the view in the physical layer. Query from this point of view is quite compilcated. However if I use correct filters the result is very fast (a few seconds)
  
  Responses of dashboard if I put a few columns from this point of view, and use the same filter, to 4 to 5 minutes to get the result. I don't know why the reading of the opinion is so slow on dashboard.
  
  If I create a table based on the view and use this table in the physical layer, then the result is much faster.
  
  Thank you

  Hello

  When the function u view the report in the bi bottom server sends the request to the database (if the cache is disabled).
  Come see, you already mentioned this query view is quite complicated, fires every time the query whenever you click on the report and checks all aggregations, the filter conditions, and joins.
  come to table, you are calculated and stored, each time that you run the report he just send the query like Select from table *.

  for this reason, the data view recovery is slow to table.

  See you soon,.
  Aravind

• Why my cursor only does not work on my taskbar, or the current window, in Windows 7?

  My cursor will work not on anything except the window I'm randomly or the taskbar

  He will do one of these:
  -Only I would like to click on stuff on the taskbar and when I put the cursor one window, it will not highlight or let me click what whether indoors, except that it will highlight reduce, restore down and out of the buttons but nothing when I click on them, and I can click right-click on the icons and choose whatever options don't appear for the programs.
  -Only allow me to things in the window, in that I currently have a click. I can communicate with anyone inside the window. If I use Google Chrome (which is the browser that I use usually) then if I click on a tab, it will be x on this tab. Nothing on the taskbar will highlight.
  Sometimes one or more of her below will be added with either of the above:
  -It will be as I have a key or something, sometimes it seems that I am now shift, sometimes ctrl, sometimes he does things that seem to do things that would happen if you took several key
  Ex: If I click on something in a program, it would produce a result that seems as if it was the result of a touch and half of a result to hold another half.
  Ex: Ex: when you play the popular game 'Minecraft' if I use a mod to give me a stack of 64, it does give me only one, as if I were a right-click instead of left. Other times when I'm in my inventory, is as I am now shift when I'm not, but it also makes things that normally occur when I hold down the SHIFT key and click.
  -My cursor is randomly as I'm left click or middle clicking.
  -I forgot something
  Resolution of the problems that I tried:
  -J' tried to withdraw using the touchpad and wireless mouse.
  -J' tried to reset my computer (it worked, but the problem is quickly returned)
  -J' I pulled up Task Manager to check some things
  After having pulled up the Task Manager, the problems stopped. but after awhile it started to come back again so I rebooted the Task Manager and it stopped again, but evertime I've done it time that the problems went got short, and now it doesn't work at all.
  -Pulled up the Task Manager and any suspect google looking for background programs (that didn't increase much info, because I have very little knowledge of what the substantive programmes should and should not work.)
  -Looked around, this site (found nothing)
  -Used A Windows virus scan and it have nothing.
  Some system info:
  Processor: Intel (r) Core (TM) 2 Duo CPU T7700 @ 2.40 GHz (2 CPUs), ~2.4GHz
  Memory: 4096 MB RAM
  Computer name: HPMANIAC
  Manufacturer: Hewlett-Packard
  Model: HP Compaq 8510p
  Operating system: Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit (6.1, Build 7600)
  BIOS: KBC Version 71.3
  I'm sure I left out something, but I really hope that this information will help someone to help me.
  This problem started to happen after a long time using my computer, usually even less time if I let my computer alone for a few minutes
  Now they will not disappear, and pulling up the Task Manager does nothing
  (Sorry for the typos, it got really a lot of time typing and correct what I have, caused my cursor keeps clicking and screwing up my typing)

  Reinstall the driver for the touchpad or mouse wireless drivers

• Sound preview audio stream starts beginning rather than at the current position in the timeline

  I have an audio stream which I'm doing an animation. After working for a while, especially later in the video (like 2 minutes or more). audio will not play at the position, I'm in the workspace and rather play early instead. It is therefore impossible to work efficiently synchronize audio animation.

  I tried with several computers and sound cards, and I get the same behavior.

  What is going on? Is this a known bug?

  Yes, it is a known problem in Windows. I have reason to believe that it will be corrected in the next update to Flash Pro. Don't know when this will be.

• Is it possible to make the comments list appear somewhere other than below the current PDF document?

  It would be great if there were some sort the list of comments when they participate in a review PDF could be moved to the right side of the PDF or in a window of its own. With a configuration dual monitor that this arrangement would allow better use of the screen real estate. It could also be useful for those who want all comments to be printed from a file without the annoying pause between each page.

  Yes it is possible, just click on & keep on comments (two yellow balloons) icon and drag off the bar.

• trackpad's battery down much more often than in the past.   What needs to be replaced the batteries or the charger?   Where online can I do this purchase, can't find it.  Thank you

  Hi, the trackpad batteries are unloaded much faster than in the past.  I reload and replace them and they quickly weaken.   What needs to be replaced, the batteries or the charger.   Tried to look on the apple website to purchase and find nothing (there must be there somewhere).  Thank you.

  They may well be replaced.   Take a look at this document.    iFixit are well known in these columns.

  If you always to 10.5.6?   Otherwise, it may be a good idea to update your profile; It's still worth anyone when they answer your questions.

  https://www.iFixit.com/Guide/magic+trackpad+battery+replacement/12884

• Why is the Nightly build of so much faster and has better quality than the final product of Firefox features?

  The Nightly build is so much faster than Firefox, and the download feature is much better than the download feature in Firefox.

  The arrow next to the home button will appear in the version of Firefox in Firefox 20. All the features that are in every night thereafter will appear in liberation, when they are ready.

• Games run too fast! (Faster than normal around 1.5 x)

  Hey I have problems playing games since the installation of W7.

  I tried only two games, which is Half Life: counter-strike 1.6 through Steam and Batman Arkham Asylum.
  From what I see, I shoot and walk faster in CS 1.6, when I play on my own. But when I join a server on Steam, I go fast, Yes, and then I will be stuck (I guess because the server will try to match my speed with others)
  In Batman: AA, I was comparing Youtube videos with my game and found that my Batman works faster than in the videos.
  Here's my DX System Info:
  ------------------

  Information System

  ------------------

  Time of this report: 11/16/2009, 22:21:27

  Name of the computer: PC

  Operating system: Windows 7 Professional 32 - bit (6.1, Build 7600) (7600.win7_rtm. 090713-1255)

  Language: English (regional setting: English)

  System manufacturer: GBT___

  System model: AWRDACPI

  BIOS: Award BIOS v6.00PG Modular

  Processor: Intel (r) Core (TM) 2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13 GHz (2 CPUs), ~2.1GHz

  Memory: 3072 MB RAM

  Available OS memory: 3072 MB RAM

  Page file: 1613MB used, 4527 MB of available space

  Windows Dir: E:\Windows

  DirectX version: DirectX 11

  DX setup parameters: not found

  DPI setting: Using System DPI

  System DPI setting: 96 DPI (100%)

  DWM DPI Scaling: disabled

  DxDiag Version: 6.01.7600.16385 32 bit Unicode

  I'm also running on a map of XFX9600GTXXX, with 8 x AA and AF, with Vsync off (must be turned off to reach 100 fps in CS, which I play competition)

  Tried solutions:

  I've been Googling for answers for almost 3 days without getting anything. I tried Winthrottle to slow down my CPU, defining my affinity proc at the base, and it does not work.

  (Although the speed improved to Batman, but running it on a carrot is terrible - did not work for CS)

  Turning on vsync seems to make it acceptable, but I'll be capped at 75 FPS.

  I need 100 fps on CS, because the response of the mouse is better.

  I was restoring my nvidia, same drivers try the new Forceware, nothing helps.

  I can't reformat my HD, but only not to do so due to college.

  These Core Dual optimizers, that I read are only for the amendments, I guess, so I can't do anything to this topic and it seems to be no fix.

  If anyone knows, I would like to know what is causing this = /

  It could well be your network drivers.  Even if you later, sometimes people writing the drivers need to improve for questions like yours that described and so you should keep a watch last updated driver.  On my laptop, for example, constantly Dell publishes new drivers for it that problems are discovered and updated correctly to handle Windows 7.  While it works great, they discover problems that may affect performance.

  Have you read anything in the counter-strike forums about anyone else having a similar problem?

• Guest WiFi network much slower than normal on the network

  Speedtests leave a device attached to the 5 GHz wireless guest network are much slower than when the same device is connected to the normal 5 GHz WiFi.

  I measured reproducible all about 7ms 18/10 down on the network of comments and 1ms 320/250 Mbps on the normal network. Same place, same camera, same speedtest app, same test server.

  Similar results of multiple devices (laptop, Windows, iPhone 6 s). No change after a reboot. QoS is off. Firmware is 1.0.6.28_1.1.83.

  What could be the reason? I don't think that I had the same problems a few months ago, but I has not changed settings since then, except for the upgrade of the firmware when a new version appeared.

  Thanks for your advice.

  that version was pulled and pulling FW rarely happens... back having previously worked FW

• Clean install of Windows a lot faster than the preinstalled system?

  My satallite comes with windows 64-bit installed.
  Since a lot of people suggested, here and elsehwere, a clean installation making consierably faster than the pre-installed windows (all bloated and unwanted software uninstalled with the uninstall program).

  Although fresh installtion was faster without drivers and programs, it has become more or less the same after installation of all software, etc. (perhaps a difference of 2 to 4% in the use of RAM) (over 4 GB)

  Is this normal or do others go much faster on any new install, for me, this effort has proved there is not a lot of use to do a clean install to drive retail.

  Ideas, wiers and feed back?

  See you soon

  Many pre-installed utilities are required for correct functionality and it can be a headache get these functions to work after installing a street copy of Windows.

  You will find that when you install Antivirus software on a street copy of Windows, it will happen similar to the pre-installed Windows installation. So if you want that the installation of Windows pre-installed perform better, uninstall the Antivirus should do the trick.

• Why is-C code so much faster? (Image processing)

  Hello!

  I'm working on a larger application but I reduced to show you a problem I encounter at the beginning. I join all the files needed to run.

  It is simple rgb2monochrome that I implemented in C code algorithm and code LabVIEW. I have not now why the C code is 4 times faster.

  In the code C transfer tables with pointers so I'm working on a given memory area. I thought that LabVIEW can be slower, because it creates unnecessary copies of berries. I tried to solve this problem with Structure elements instead and value reference data but no effect.

  I also tried to change the tunnels in the shift registers in some places (read in optimizing LabVIEW Embedded Applications). I changed options in the execution of the subVIs properties and I created EXE application to see if it will be faster. Unfortunately I can not yet reduce the difference time of execution.

  I know that my algorithm can be better optimized, but this isn't the main problem. Now the two algorithm are implemented in the same way (you can check in cpp file) when it should have a similar execution times. I think I made a mistake in the LabVIEW code, maybe something with memory management?

  And I know more... Maybe nothing wrong with LabVIEW code but something too good in C code ? It is 64 b library, implementation of usual way without forcing the parallelism. Moreover I brand performance in the thread of UI in COLD LAKE. But perhaps nevertheless CPU manages this function with multi hearts? I have 4 cores then the difference in execution time would be good . But it's impossible, right?

  I know that the notice that LabVIEW is sometimes slow, but approximately 15%, not 4 times. So I had to make a mistake... Anyone know what kind of ?

  Kind regards
  ksiadz13

  Well, here are a few things that make faster LabVIEW code, there are other improvements that could be made, but I would need to do several tests to see if they are better based on your input data.  First of all, I would like to enforce the VI Inline, not subroutine.  Also, I'd work with arrays of data instead of scalar values.  Also, you know the number of rows and columns because it is the size of the array, why keep this information?  Oh and if you are working with curls you can try parallel for loops to work on more than one processor at a time.

  And also, I'm not sure that all this work is in any way necessary.  If you have a double and turn it into a U8, it will be 255 If the value was greater than that to start with.  Attached is an updated release with several possible options to try.

  

  Oh and another improvement, why are you even unbundling the data in Unbundle_imageCPU1.vi?  Why not work with this table 2D-Red Green Blue?  I realize that even VI is called in LabVIEW code options both C but with LabVIEW just deal with other data could make faster together.  In particular, in view of the fact that regroup you after you're done anyway.