Table sizes

Similar Questions

• 2 dimension table size error

  Hello

  In file attached an example of my problem. I remove a 2-dimension table and the size of the screen. I can see in "size 2" (see the example) that the size is not 0. Is this a normal behavior?

  Thanks in advance, Daniel.

  Hi Daniel,.

  Since the delete array help page:

  "Delete From table details

  This function reduces the table in only one dimension... »

  Even if your table 'seem empty,' he is so really. I'm guessing that the memory for lines is still allocated.

  You can see by connecting the array to a loop and check how many times she iterates (i.e. twice).

  To really empty table, you can add a further dismantling of the Array function and delete lines (length = 2, index = 0). Now connect this to a for loop and you will see it does not iterate. Table sizes will now be 0,0.

  A little weird at first, but ultimately this is the expected behavior.

  Steve

• How to compare the original value of table size and the changed value

  juice I took a table and then took the function of the size of the array so that it shows me the number of the elements present in it. so it'll be the original table size value. If the items in the table even changes another value, then I want to compare the original table size value and the value of table size has changed. How to compare... Please help me. you are looking for a possible solution. Thank you

  Hi stara,

  the attached picture shows the ony solution.

  It will be useful.

  Mike

• WARNING: table size limit exceeded

  Noticed this error on a sensor event. I had the same as those of the 5378-0,5488-0,5528-0,5476-0.5557-0,5687-0,5524-0 sigs.

  What it means?

  evError: eventId = 1130169990404666072 = severity = WARNING Cisco vendor

  Author:

  hostId: 02-evlan-c7

  appName: sensorApp

  appInstanceId: 355

  time: December 1, 2005 19:10:08 UTC offset-360 = timeZone = GMT-06:00

  errorMessage: warning Table size limit exceeded by GIS 5378.0. Additional table will be created. name = errUnclassified

  These warnings are initially simply information and do not constitute an error that the user needs to worry.

  When signatures are added to the sensor, the sensor will compile all signatures in a large regular expression cache table. This considerably speeds up the analysis. The cache table, however, has a limited size. When you add a signature to the cache table would develop the table beyond the allowed size, then you will see the warning that you posted above.

  That caveat lets you know, it's that he couldn't add that signature to the existing table, and so it must create a new table for the signature and the signatures follow.

  This information before debugging for developers of signature just so they can track what is happening because signatures are added.

  The sensor works correctly and work very well. The addition of the new table only adds a very small performance reduction as an extra table must be analyzed during the analysis of the packets.

  Users running with the signature by default settings would never need to worry about this message and can consider only a few logging information (it should really have been a status message instead of an error message)

  Users who are unretiring signatures or creating their own custom signatures can see this message as they set up their sensors. So then he os to let them know that tables additional cache is taken to be created to manage the additional signatures. Once more just information and not a real error.

• How to write a loop repeat 2 in 2D array values to readable size 10 1 table size

  Hello everyone, I need help about to write for loop or may be a different approach, as you know for

  I have a table 1 [1 2 3 4 5 67 8 9 10] d... now I want use for loop that reads 2 values as ([1 2]) and together these 2 values of first line of 2D array and repeat in a loop again read another 2 values ([3 4]) and set the 2 row table 2D like this line [5 6] 3 table 2D... .as she write 5 lines of table (2 * 5) 2D to 1 d (1 * 10) table... you can tell otherwise easy as not exatcly to be for loop... Thanks a lot for your help and suggestions... waiting for your answers

  The short answer is that you must use the function Array reshape.

  The longer answer involves more questions.  You still have the same table 1 d of size?  If this isn't the case, it will always be an even number of elements?  If this is not the case, what you do with the last element?  If you keep, what do you use to "pad" of the additional element of the matrix of results?

  

• Data in table size limit @ 129491 float64s

  I don't have a studio of measure, but I'm trying to s-series OR-DAQ interface modules using the NIDAQmx.h interface.

  My problem boils down to the following in a c ++ application project console (visual studio 2005):

  #include

  int main() {}

  float64 data [128 * 128 * 6];  98304 64 - bit numbersor 786432 bytes (not a megabyte)

  }

  This command compiles and runs very well.

  If I increase the allocated size of the table given more 129491 (float64s), the program compiles well but when I run the console program, I get an exception of windows does not support.  Now that the number is just shy of 20-bit addressing for bytes, but it is not like he is exactly on the number or anything.

  I will continue to look around for a solution, but if anyone can help, that would be great.

  Thank you!

  Hello Gus,

  The stack size by default for applications compiled with Visual C++ is 1 MB. Note that the operating system and C runtime uses some stack space before that never call your main() function, so you have slightly less than a megabyte to work with. You can increase the size of the stack using the Visual C++/f option, but a better approach is to allocate the array on the heap instead (using malloc () free () or new/delete [] []).

  Brad

• Different font on label multiline table size

  I feel that the answer is going to be it is not possible, but is it possible to have the text of different sizes in the same row/column label?  I want to do is to have up to three lines of text, where the first line is larger than the other two... Maybe some sequence in the string of exhaust... something like:

  SetTableRowAttribute (handle, control, 1, ATTR_LABEL_TEXT, "<\big>Line1\n<\little><\little>Line3 Line2\n");

  Hi gtoph,

  Unfortunately, there is no way to have the different fonts in a single table cell.

  Suggestion of JR is a good thing. I'll add my own, in case that you have to scroll the table, but you don't need to edit the text:

  You can create and configure a control out of the screen that has the look you want (see attachment), then empty control in an image using GetCtrlDisplayBitmap, set the type of cell in your table to VAL_CELL_PICTURE and then put your bitmap image in the cell.

  But of course, this will not work unless you want to only display the text and not modify it.

  Luis

• Composed of different arithmetic table size

  Hi all

  I have two table with a different size,

  Table 1 table 2

  1                0

  1                0

  1                0

  1

  If compound arithmetic GOLD was performed on them, I went out

  1

  1

  1

  Is it possible that I can get

  1

  1

  1

  1

  Thank you.

  The filling is more easily done using "reshape the table." Here is a minimal code that fills the shorter array to the size of the longer of the two.

  

• Partioned table - size Tablespace

  Hi all

  I need to find the size of a tablespace (free and used) for a partitioned table, can help some action on that by sharing the script. Google to get it, but could not able to find

  Thank you

  Clara wrote:

  Hi all

  I need to find the size of a tablespace (free and used) for a partitioned table, can help some action on that by sharing the script. Google to get it, but could not able to find

  Thank you

  start by querying ALL_TAB_PARTITIONS

  I offer you my condolences; Since you rarely get your questions answered here.

  https://forums.Oracle.com/people/soundar/content

• design of table size question of data modeling

  Hi Experts,
  Sorry if I put my question in a wrong forum please suggest an appropriate forum.
  
  need your opinion on the current design of our data warehouse of 10 years.
  There is a dimension table with the structure as follows
  
  Dimension table
  --------------------
  Number of dimension key (THIS IS NOT a PRIMARY KEY)
  Natural key (from source) number
  the source name character
  current record indicator e Char (1)
  date of form_date
  TO_DATE date
  several other columns, which, if change a new current record is created and the previous one is marked as H-historical
  
  Data are stored in the table of size like this
  Dimension_key natural key Source name current record ind from_date to to_date
  1 10001 Source1: 1 January 2005 May 31, 2005
  1 10001 Source1: 1 - jun - 20005 12-dec-2011
  1 10001 Source1 C 13-dec-2011 NULL
  
  2 20002 Source1: 1 - jun - 20001 12-dec-2011
  2 20002 Source1 C 13-dec-2011 NULL
  
  The problem I see in this design is that if any attribute is changed there is no surrogate key, the new record is inserted first taking the key dimension based on the (natural_key, source_name, current_record_ind).
  Shouldn't it be kept as follows based on the principles of data warehousing.
  
  Dimension_key natural key Source name current record ind from_date to to_date
  1 10001 Source1: 1 January 2005 May 31, 2005
  2 10001 Source1: 1 - jun - 20005 12-dec-2011
  3 10001 Source1 C 13-dec-2011 NULL
  
  4-20002 Source1: 1 - jun - 20001 12-dec-2011
  5 20002 Source1 C 13-dec-2011 NULL
  
  Please let me know the advantages and disadvantages of the current design.
  
  Published by: Rous Sharma on December 15, 2011 20:28

  Correct, your second example for example by using a surrogate key is design to go with.

  Flaws with the original design:

  -There is a relationship one between Dimension_Key and Natural_Key, no need to keep both.
  -Si Dimension_Key is the FK with a fact table, there will be a number of many relationships between fact and Dimension.
  -Additional processing to search for Dimension_Key rather than simply for example use a sequence.

• Maximum table size

  Hello

  How to find the size of the table limit.

  in fact, you could hit a limit of loop until you hit a limit table.  but you'll see with this code.

• ADF table size

  Greetings,
  
  Anyone know how to avoid ADF table more than the size of the space (height) available.
  
  It does not seem to grow, but in the table, I inserted an inlineStyle = "" border-bottom: 1px solid red "and the line is at the bottom of the page and not at the end of the table."
  
  How can I get around this? I tried inside a regular table, stretch, etc...
  
  Best regards and thanks in advance.

  Hello

  You can use the "autoHeightRows" property in the af: table:
  First to set contentDelivery = "immediate".
  Then, you must set the current length of data on autoHeightRows (for example autoHeightRows = "#{jstlfn:length (displayedList)}").

  Natalia

• ODI a table as a table size of loading

  Hello
  
  I have a table with two columns.
  Name of the table - PROGRAMS.
  Columns - Pgm_ID, Pgm_Type.
  
  What I'm trying to accomplish when I add a new line, I want to update this table. But if the same Pgm_Type already exists, to ignore it.
  
  In my model, I loaded this table as type SCD OLAP. Pgm_ID as a substitute key column and Pgm_Type as add a line about the changes. In my procedure insert statement, I added 3 additional lines, but I'm a primary key violation. Is it possible to do this without adding additional columns for the current record flag and start and end time stamp etc, is there an alternative way to deal with it.
  
  Thanks for your time and your help.

  You can use an incremental update KM. For example, incremental update of IKM Oracle (FUSION).

  -Put your UK (unique key) on Pgm_ID.
  -Select the Insert for the Pgm_ID and the Pgm_Type.
  -Select the update for Pgm_Type box.

  So, when you load data from the source:
  -If the Pgm_ID is not in the target, the line is copied.
  -If the Pgm_ID is not in the target, the Pgm_Type is updated.

  It will be useful.

  Kind regards
  JeromeFr

• Table size 700 pixels

  I make a Web page where I have a 700 table pixel and a few other smaller tables inside. In Dreamweaver, and when I saw the page, I have to use the horizontal scroll bar. No idea why? I checked the code - there is no big picture and if I take the small tables and images, the results are the same.
  Any ideas?
  
  Thank you

  Hello. Boy, once you know, you can get started. Because my table is 700px and my context menus are larger than 700px, it created in my view, block elements. I went in Fireworks and clicked on the link text/popup and just drag items from menu on the left. So, now when I test it, there is no horizontal scroll bar!

  Geez.

  I have my phone with me to pass by thebut who's going to check it out later. Thanks for your help.

• Warning of coherence - [39008] Table size not attached to Source fact

  I have a scheme in which I have the following tables:
  (A) fact Table patient Transaction (e.g., supplies used, procedures performed, etc..)
  (B) demographic Dimension table (houses info like patient location code)
  (C) location Dimension table (tells me what each location unique maps to the hospital)
  
  Is this table A and table B is a dimension table is attached to A table based on the ID of the Patient, so I can get general information about the patient. This would allow me to apply logic to see just patients transactions where the patient was FEMALE, or has been in the emergency room, by applying conditions to these fields in table B.
  
  Table C is a lookup table simple accompanied in table B of the Code of location, so I can identify the hospital emergency room where the patient was in for example.
  
  So the pattern is: has <-b <-C, where B and C are the two dimension tables.
  
  The query works the way you want, but my consistency check gives me the following WARNING:
  
  * [39008] logical dimension table D LOCATION MASTER has a source D LOCATION MASTER does not join any source.*
  
  How to fix this WARNING, or at least remove?

  Hello

  What you need to do is to add the dimension table to store (physical) to the source of the logic of the demographic dimension table, for example by dragging of the layer on top of picture logic source of demographic of MDB layer logical dimension table

  Kind regards
  Stijn