Test unit on a C code

Similar Questions

• I can't unlock my iphone by apple ID knowing that the previous owner removed the device from his account, but still the unit asks the old code in order to unlock the phone

  I can't unlock my iphone by apple ID knowing that the previous owner removed the device from his account, but still the unit asks the old code in order to unlock the phone

  If the device is always ask for the ID of the previous owner, then it is has not been deleted.

• Problems of LabVIEW with Test Unit under lvoop

  Hello

  I try now provided with LV2012 with a LVOOP code Unit Test infrastructure but seem to be a few problems.

  I have built a unit test for a base class in the attached draft who is the source of class (it is another class in the project as it is an example of a method for recovering, but it is not used in the unit test). My problem is that I get results that fail for one of my tests, when I think they have to work.

  Basically, the unit test is configured as follows

  Case 1) test the VI without installation VI and ensure proper operation default values

  Case 2) test VI by setting specific values in the test in VI of disassembly and also check the single release of "Source Method.vi" configuration VI

  Case 3) Test of the VI with the VI of installation using the default values and confirm them through the VI of disassembly

  When running case 2 fails and indicates that disassembly of the VI return values by default not those fed to the installation VI. I don't see why.

  As per

  

  Any suggestions?

  All the best

  David

  Hi David,

  The behavior you describe is planned. When you first call the 'Source_Method.vi' by using the 'SourceAccess Unit Test Manual.vi", the"Unit Test Manual.vi SourceAccess' creates and instance of the "Source_Method.vi". In this specific case of the VI it will boot with the default values but will then retain the values passed by the "Unit Test Manual.vi SourceAccess' until the project we closed, or specifically tell you to reset defaults. Whenever she is called by 'SourceAccess Unit Test Manual.vi' it will access this instance of it. If another instance of the "Source_Method.vi" was created by another parent it would be initialized with their default values, until crushed by the top-level VI calling. Then would he behave exactly as the instance created by the "Unit Test Manual.vi SourceAccess". Whatever your type typedef and its configuration, as long as everything is connected correctly, this should be the expected behavior when you configure things through object-oriented programming in LabVIEW.

  I hope this information is useful to your application. If you want to see a LabVIEW example that demonstrates this behavior, you should consider referring to parts of the ReferenceObject.lvproj. It is found by searching in the example finder LabVIEW object-oriented. This is accessible via

  Help > find examples.

• Unit Testing Unit Test Framework when the expected production is just a table of NaNs to report a fake PASS

  It is a cross-post of the Unit Testing Group:

  https://decibel.NI.com/content/message/121915#121915

  I remember having this problem with the old version of the unit testing framework, but alas, it is still present in the new version.

  To do this, I use LabVIEW 2015.

  A customer contacted ask me what to do, because the expected output was table of NaNs and the VI under test returns an array of numbers and yet, the test was passing!

  My suggestion to use as a solution was to create a defined trial user who would test for the table of NaNs. I was wondering if someone here had found this problem and if you have further suggestions other than user defined Test.

  Until someone suggests we turn to JKI VI tester for this project, I can tell you that we use UTF and tester of JKI VI not because the client is in a regulated industry.

  A video describing the problem and the workaround (via user defined Tests) is here: https://youtu.be/AoBe-Gw2Nzo

  Question: Is using a user defined Test is the best approach? We missing something in the way that the Unit Test is defined which translates the fake of the Test infrastructure Unit reports that the test successful?

  Thank you

  Fab

  Hey Fab,

  I was able to reproduce the problem on my machine and I have observed the same results. What I see in the video, it looks that you are setting the unit test. I think that this is a bug rather than your test configuration, so I presented a report on this issue will have to be reviewed by the R & D.

  Go ahead, I agree that a user defined Test is the best solution in this case. If it meets the needs of your clients, I recommend you take this option.

• Store keys BitLocker in AD - create TPM ACE on the ORGANIZATION Test Unit?

  Hello, we strive to make our computers store BitLocker recovery information in AD in accordance with the instructions given in these articles:

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd875529 (WS.10) .aspx

  http://blog.concurrency.com/infrastructure/enable-BitLocker-automatically-save-keys-to-Active-Directory/#storeinad

  One step, cited in both articles is to allow the computers to write their secure their correspondents computer objects in active directory the TPM recovery information by running the script found here

  This script seems to work in the world, I want to only operate on our group ORGANIZATIONAL unit pilot test computers. Is it possible to create these ACE on an ORGANIZATIONAL unit, and how can I do this?

  Thank you

  Hey Chauncey,

  The question you posted would be better suited in the TechNet Forums. I would recommend posting your query in the TechNet Forums.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/winserverfiles/threads

• custom digital limit test units

  Hello

  I did a test to limit step digital custum (TS 3.0, 8.2 LV). Normally with the stage of test AND numerical limit, step generates a variable unit in Locals.ResultList [x]. Units if a unit is registered. How can I do this with LV or where do I store the information of the unit (chains of research such as Step.Units or Step.Result.Units does not work).

  Hope you can help me.

  Schwede

  
  

• Windows Update has stopped working and Windows has stopped the unit, he reported problems (code 43)

  Original title: Windows Update stopped working Vista Home Basic.

  HP laptop 550 Vista home basic 32-bit.  Windows Update stopped working, also adapter display Windows stopped the device says it has reported problems (code 43). I uninstalled / reinstalled the drivers, but not make any difference. Thanks for any help.

  Hello

  Question: Windows Update has stopped working

  1. do you get an error message when you try to update?

  2. were there any changes (hardware or software) to the computer before the show?

  Perform the steps from the link below.

  The problems with the installation of updates (Windows Vista)

  Question: display Error Code 43 adapter has stopped the unit

  Run the Fixit and check if it helps.

  Hardware devices do not work or are not detected in Windows (Fixit)

  Hope this information helps.

• 2.1: reports of Test Unit in SQL Developer 2.1 (fixed in release 63,73)

  Hi people,
  
  I use the new unit test in 2.1(.0.62) SQL Developer functions and am really loving what is there - little about all the stuff that I'm used from JUnit.
  
  However, when I try to access built-in reports, I get a dialog box stating:
  
  No application found to the version of the selected database.
  
  This feature is dependent on a particular version of the database, or is it just something missing in the release of EA?
  
  Thank you
  
  Chris Hughes
  
  Published by: Chris Hughes on December 11, 2009 14:34
  
  Published by: Chris Hughes on December 11, 2009 16:34
  
  Published by: Chris Hughes on December 16, 2009 16:34

  Hi Chris -.

  Please try the new unit test in functionality. I don't know what causes your problems with EA1: (, but I just tried to run some of the reports in the ai2 candidate & they work fine :).)

  Brian Jeffries
  SQL development team

• HP G62 Notebook PC, 64-bit, may still be under warranty. Test drive, 303 equaled error code?

  I dropped my computer. He then again not being not able to boot and invited me him for a boot CD. I went into the Bios and a hard disk and the memory check. Memory was good but SHORT test hard drive says "303".

  What does that mean?

  I have, I don't know if my computer is still under warranty. How can I deal with that. Suppose that I don't have the reciet.

  You killed the hard drive in the menu dropdown. Even if you had a guarantee it would not cover. What is physical damage, if any?

  If it works in the opposite case, you can replace the hard drive. You can get a hard drive for maybe $60 and we can guide you through restoring the software.

• Adobe Photoshop CS6 Installation offline to test problems (ask for the Code)

  I tried to install Adobe Photoshop CS6 offline trial because he says "my computer is not connected to the Internet" , but I can't understand how to generate a claim code. See the screenshots. Here are my EXACT measurements. I don't know where to go from here. Thank you!

  Step 1. I click on "connect now".

  Step 2. It loads for about 2-3 minutes

  3 step, this screen appears and I click the link that says http://www.adobe.com/go/getactivated

  Step 4. This screen and hit "generate a response Code.

  Step 5. This screen and I have no idea how to get a claim code.

  

  Disable your firewall setting and disable the adapter miniport network connection wireless network.

  It will work. If it doesn't please call adobe for offline activation

• Just opened new Adoge Edge v 20141, when I publish a simple test file, I get error code, reads "unsupported paths: / apple-touch-icon - precompressed.png, / apple-touch - icon.png"I did use all the images in my test file. "  Am I missing something?

  

  This has more to do with safari, rather than leading edge. For the time being users can try on Chrome (the question does not run on Chrome) while we face to fix/work around.

  Thank you

  Dieudonné

• Unit test: calculation of the length of the different columns in recordsets provided and received led to false a test failure

  Dear team of SQL Developer,

  It seems that the calculation of the length of the column in the expected and received recordsets behaves differently in some cases (when stored proc variables are used in the generation of the REF CURSOR, despite the explicit definition of the type of record): the length of the header and the length of the value in the set of records received are truncated to arbitrary length based on the returned value which leads to a false failure of a unit test. I.e. registries are the same in both sets of records, but the test run fails to the comparison of the recordsets because of different length. Please see the screenshot below:

  

  Here's the test case if you need to reproduce the problem/bug in your environment:

  1. use the default schema of HR of the Oracle examples package that comes with an 11 g database.

  2. change the HR. Table EMPLOYEES with the addition of a new column VARCHAR2 (4000) LONG_LAST_NAME:

  ALTER TABLE HR. EMPLOYEES

  ADD (LONG_LAST_NAME VARCHAR2 (4000));

  Update hr.employees set long_last_name = last_name;

  commit;

  3. create a PKG_TEST2 package with the source code below in the HR schema:

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  create or replace PACKAGE PKG_TEST2 AS

  TYPE EmployeeInfoRec IS RECORD

  (

  long_last_name employees.long_last_name%TYPE,

  first name employees.first_name%TYPE,

  E-mail employees.email%TYPE

  );

  TYPE EmployeeInfoRecCur IS REF CURSOR RETURN EmployeeInfoRec;

  FUNCTION getEmployeeInfo (p_Emp_Id employees.employee_id%TYPE)

  RETURN EmployeeInfoRecCur;

  END PKG_TEST2;

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY PKG_TEST2 AS

  FUNCTION getEmployeeInfo (p_Emp_Id employees.employee_id%TYPE)

  RETURN EmployeeInfoRecCur AS

  v_EmployeeInfoRecCur EmployeeInfoRecCur;

  v_LongLastName varchar2 (4000);

  BEGIN

  Select long_last_name from v_LongLastName

  employees

  where employee_id = p_Emp_Id;

  --

  OPEN FOR V_EmployeeInfoRecCur

  V_LongLastName SELECT long_last_name,

  first name,

  E-mail

  This_is_very_long_table_alias employees

  WHERE employee_id = p_Emp_Id

  order by 1 CSA;

  --

  RETURN v_EmployeeInfoRecCur;

  EXCEPTION

  WHILE OTHERS THEN

  LIFT;

  END getEmployeeInfo;

  END PKG_TEST2;

  
  

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  4. create a unit test for the PKG_TEST2.getEmployeeInfo stored procedure: (click the command create Test, select the stored procedure, click Ok for the pop-up message, click Next, click Finish).

  5. update the default value of dynamic query of value with the one below and save/post changes.

  Select the cursor)

  SELECT long_last_name,

  first name,

  E-mail

  Employees

  WHERE employee_id = idqry.employee_id

  order of the 1 CAD

  ) RETURNS $,.

  idqry.employee_id as P_EMP_ID

  from (select employee_id

  employees

  where rownum < = 5) idqry

  6. run the unit test newly created in the debug mode to display the shot.

  Thus, the record type 'EmployeeInfoRec' in the package clearly defines the LONG_LAST_NAME as VARCHAR2 (4000) through reference for the data type of column in the referenced table.

  But for some reason, the SQL Developer does not calculate correctly its length in the recordset "Receipts" If a variable is used (could be one as variable simple varchar2 in this reproducible test or complex variable of type of the object).

  Any ideas on that? Looks like another bug...

  Thank you

  Val

  The bug has been reproduced by the SRB and documented within the system of Support of Oracle SQL Developer team to pick it up:

  Bug 19943948 - TEST UNIT RETURNS EXPECTED ERROR: [LONG_LAST_NAME

  Hope the bug name can later be changed to something more descriptive, but it is not really... my only concern is the speed at which the known bugs would be fixed...

  Thank you

  Val

• Unit test: behavior another header in recordsets provided and received led to false a test failure

  Dear team of SQL Developer,

  It seems that the headers in the expected and received Recordset behaves differently: the headers of expression in the expected Recordset are truncated to 30 characters and the same expression in the set of records received headers are not truncated, which leads to a false failure of a unit test. That is that the records are the same in both sets of records, but the test run fails to comparison of sets of records due to the different headings. Please see the screenshot below:

  

  Here's the test case if you need to reproduce the problem/bug in your environment:

  1. use the default schema of HR of the Oracle examples package that comes with an 11 g database.

  2 create a PKG_TEST package with the source code below in the HR schema:

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  create or replace PACKAGE PKG_TEST AS

  TYPE EmployeeInfoRec IS RECORD

  (

  employees.last_name%type last_name,

  first name employees.first_name%TYPE,

  E-mail employees.email%TYPE

  );

  TYPE EmployeeInfoRecCur IS REF CURSOR RETURN EmployeeInfoRec;

  FUNCTION upperCaseLastName (p_Last_Name employees.last_name%TYPE)

  RETURN varchar2;

  FUNCTION getEmployeeInfo (p_Emp_Id employees.employee_id%TYPE)

  RETURN EmployeeInfoRecCur;

  END PKG_TEST;

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY PKG_TEST AS

  FUNCTION upperCaseLastName (p_Last_Name employees.last_name%TYPE)

  RETURN varchar2 AS

  BEGIN

  RETURN upper (p_Last_Name);

  END upperCaseLastName;

  FUNCTION getEmployeeInfo (p_Emp_Id employees.employee_id%TYPE)

  RETURN EmployeeInfoRecCur AS

  v_EmployeeInfoRecCur EmployeeInfoRecCur;

  BEGIN

  OPEN FOR V_EmployeeInfoRecCur

  SELECT upperCaseLastName (last_name),

  first name,

  E-mail

  This_is_very_long_table_alias employees

  WHERE employee_id = p_Emp_Id

  order by 1 CSA;

  --

  RETURN v_EmployeeInfoRecCur;

  EXCEPTION

  WHILE OTHERS THEN

  LIFT;

  END getEmployeeInfo;

  END PKG_TEST;

  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  3. create a unit test for the PKG_TEST.getEmployeeInfo stored procedure: (click the command create test, select the stored procedure, click Ok for the pop-up message, click Finish).

  4. update the default value with the following dynamic query and save the changes.

  Select the cursor)

  SELECT pkg_test.upperCaseLastName (last_name),

  first name,

  E-mail

  This_is_very_long_table_alias employees

  WHERE employee_id = idqry.employee_id

  order of the 1 CAD

  ) RETURNS $,.

  idqry.employee_id as P_EMP_ID

  from (select employee_id

  employees

  where rownum < = 5) idqry

  5. run the unit test newly created in the debug mode to display the shot.

  The work around is to use an alias for the expression of long short, but our code is in Production, and we do not a new version whenever soon to add aliases... but we plan to use SQL Developer to automate our unit of PL/SQL code, tests once we clearly have some of the problems with the tool, we know...

  Please advise...

  Thank you

  Val

  Of course, Jeff... CS it logged as a bug... could be changed to apply for development later, I guess...

  BUG 19826375 - header BEHAVIOR IN the GAMES of RECORDS EXPECTED/RECEIVED LED to the ERROR

  Thank you

  Val

• SMART short Self Test Failed - (error code: WHD16-8NR)

  Hi all

  I had my XPS L520X for 4 years and 2 months. I've never had a problem with its operation until last week. Randomly, it restarted and came with the PCI Realtek issue when it restarts.

  To cut a very long story short Fault find it which is going on, I reinstalled the entire operating system, including formatting of the hard drive.

  The problem of the laptop different freeze/crash and reboot with erros while doing normal tasks has not been resolved.

  I have run the Dell support center software and it shows the auto SMART test failed with the following code (error code: WHD16-8NR).

  Event log:

  Dell Support Center log file
  March 17, 2016 16:53:55
  Overall result: failed

  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  ST9750420AS [ATA:0:0\\?\ide#diskst9750420as___0005dem1#4&34e0611c&0&0.0.0#{53f56307-b6bf-11d0-94f2-00a0c91efb8b]}
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Seller: Seagate
  Model number: ST9750420AS
  Serial number: 6WS100EG
  Firmware revision: 0005DEM1
  Size: 698,6 GB
  Rotation speed: 7200 RPM
  Cache size: 16 MB
  Temperature: 43 c
  Physical sector size: 4 KB
  Logical sector size: 512 B
  Count of logical sector: 1465149168
  Supported standards: ATA8-ACS, ATA/ATAPI-7, ATA/ATAPI-6, ATA/ATAPI-5
  Specification Version: Rev ATA8-ACS 4

  ----------------------------
  OS - C: [PARTITION:C\\.\C:\]
  ----------------------------

  File system: NTFS
  Volume serial number: 5087-8802
  Volume capacity: 679.00 GB
  Amount of free space: 568,63 GB
  Volume space used: 110,37 GB

  Test of the SMART State

  Test started - 17/03/2016 16:43:57
        
  Finished test:-17/03/2016 16:43:59
  Past

  Test of SMART thresholds

  Test started - 17/03/2016 16:43:59
        
  Finished test:-17/03/2016 16:44:01
  Past

  Targeted reading test

  Test started - 17/03/2016 16:44:01
        
  Finished test:-17/03/2016 16:44:05
  Past

  Try to search randomly

  Test started - 17/03/2016 16:44:05
        
  Finished test:-17/03/2016 16:44:54
  Past

  Funnel Seek Test

  Test started - 17/03/2016 16:44:54
        
  Finished test:-17/03/2016 16:46:14
  Past

  Short what SMART self-test

  Test started - 17/03/2016 16:46:14
        
  Error message:-17/03/2016 16:46:24
  The unit has reported the following State: the previous self-test completed having the read element of the test failed.
  Error message:-17/03/2016 16:46:25
  The first default LBA value is 121243744 and the failure occurred after that the device was working since 8792 hours under tension.
  Finished test:-17/03/2016 16:46:26
        Failed (error code: WHD16-8NR)

  Surface Scan Test

  Test started - 17/03/2016 16:46:26
        
  Finished test:-17/03/2016 16:47:25
  Past

  Surface Scan Test - 2

  Test started - 17/03/2016 16:47:25
        
  Finished test:-17/03/2016 16:48:58
  Past

  I also went in the BIOS BOOT MENU by pressing F12 at startup and ran diagnostics that seemed to have said everything going, however I saw a mistake, faliure in its process that was too fast for me to write the error.

  In a nutshell, my thought is that my hard drive has failed / is corrupted or is about to fail.

  My simple question is, do I need a new hard drive with the information I've provided?

  Thank you very much!

  To all those who read this topic:

  I rang Dell directly and they confirmed my hard drive needs to be replaced.

  8792 power over time, I think that its actually me good.

  Bravo and thanks for the reply ejn63

• surface scan test 2 in the hardware diagnostic tool indicates an error code: hd535-2w. What should I do?

  I have a desktop HP Pavilion a6702f.  Operating system 64-bit Windows 7.  Following the analysis of material Diagnostics, I have an error.  During the review of the test surface 2, the test failed and showed error code hd535-2w.  What do this mean and what do I do about it?

  Hello

  This error would tend to indicate that the hard disk is running out.  First thing we do is to backup all your personall files as soon as you can.

  Once completed, the only solution is to replace the drive.  If you need a guide on this, please let me know.

  Kind regards

  DP - K