UCS 540 and SPA 112 ATA

Similar Questions

• Stream SPA 112 unsuccessful T38 fax call scenario

  Hello

  I will try to explain the situation better than I can.

  A fax device is connected to the port of SPA 112 phone (Firmware Version: 1.3.5 (004_XU001) Sep 16 2014). ATA a T38 support is enabled and a Terminal gateway in this case. A voip account is configured and registered to a provider that supports T38 fax relay Protocol.

  Another fax device is connected to the originating gateway (in this case Patton Smartnode gateway analog) and another voip account is saved in the same provider. T.38 support is intentionally disabled on the originating gateway.

  I expect the following call flow:

  -Endpoint gateway answers the call (G711)

  -Gateway endpoint offers T38 when a fax signal is detected

  -originating gateway rejects the offer t38 (disabled on the device)

  -call is reinvited to G711

  If you look at debugging (zipped attachment, OCAP), seems that the appeal is made to G711, but there is no the SPA112 RTP stream after the G711.

  Any ideas on that?

  ARO

  Sebastian

  P. S.

  To explain the IP addresses used in the trace:

  10.128.3.1 - sip proxy

  10.128.3.4 - media proxy

  10.200.0.17 - originally gateway

  10.200.0.253 - destination gateway (SPA)

  I would like to analyze the captured file and comment on the most important steps. Let go.

  I see two sessions:

  A: 10.200.0.17-> 10.128.3.1	B: 10.128.3.1-> 10.200.0.253
  -> INVITE (with SDP, aLaw, media, 10.200.0.17, sendrecv) <-180 ringing="" (with="" sdp,="" alaw,="" media="" 10.128.3.1,="">	-> INVITE (with SDP, aLaw, media, 10.200.0.17, sendrecv) <- ringing="" (no="">

  The session is now is being "call setup" with installation accounting preliminary call audio ringtones, media 10.200.0.17,10.128.3.1 aloi, bidirectional (sendrecv).

  The session B is now in the phase "system call", no preliminary audio, call progress announced by SIP itself message

  A: 10.200.0.17-> 10.128.3.1	B: 10.128.3.1-> 10.200.0.253
  <- ok="" (with="" sdp,="" alaw,media="" 10.128.3.4,=""> <>	<- ok="" (with="" sdp,="" alaw,media="" 10.200.0.253,=""> -> ACK

  The session is now in phase 'call connected' with 10.200.0.17,10.128.3.4 audio quality, bidirectional (sendrecv).

  The session B is now in phase 'call connected' with 10.200.0.17,10.200.0.253 audio quality, bidirectional (sendrecv).

  Two RTP stream can be seen in the capture file

  1: leave the package 125 & 126 (seq. 4911) 10.200.0.17-> 10.128.3.4-> 10.200.0.253

  2: from the package 129 & 130 (seq. 210) 10.200.0.253-> 10.128.3.4-> 10.200.0.17

  NMC is passed through them and was detected by the endpoint device. So invite:

  A: 10.200.0.17-> 10.128.3.1	B: 10.128.3.1-> 10.200.0.253
  <- invite="" (with="" sdp,="" t.38,media=""> -> 488 not acceptable here	<- invite="" (with="" sdp,="" t.38,="" media=""> -> OK (with SDP, T.38. Media 10.128.3.4)

  T.38 was so successfully (re) - negotiated on session B as sip proxy approved the T.38. Remain sitting A in the former State (e.g. aLaw audio) from peripheral transition rejected T.38.

  Note that proxy media receive the 10.200.0.253 T.38 returns one as-is to 10.200.0.17 despite the existence is not T.38 negotiated here. Also, use packets received 10.200.0.17 are returned as-is from 10.200.0.253 (they are interpreted as T.38 packets).

  It's a little unfortunate behavior. Media proxy should recode media of the Protocol on the left side is not the same as the Protocol on the right side. Proxy SIP should not approve the change of Protocol unless it knows that the proxy media can handle them. On an ideal world, the SIP proxy should not OK T.38/reINVITE to 10.20.0.253, unless he received 10.200.0.17 OK. As a principal is not willing to talk to T.38 and media proxy cannot translate aloi<->T.38 termination invitations must be rejected.

  Well, we do not live in the perfect word and invitations request has been approved. Now, the SIP proxy know proxy media cannot handle the current configuration, then it starts attempt to return the two session at aloi (despite the A session is aLaw already):

  A: 10.200.0.17-> 10.128.3.1	B: 10.128.3.1-> 10.200.0.253
  <- invite="" (with="" sdp,="" alaw,="" media=""> -> OK (with SDP, aLaw. Media 10.200.0.17)	-> INVITE (with SDP, aLaw, 10.128.3.4 media) <- ok="" (with="" sdp,="" alaw.="" media="">

  The two sessions should be now in mode aloi. Unfortunately, despite the 10.200.0.253 received the passage to the quality he continue to use T.38.

  Conclusion:

  It seems that you hit the bug in the firmware. SPA112 must be:

  R: rejection invite T.38 to genuine, if she is unable to do it properly

  or

  B: do it right

  Moreover, in the case of 'A', the SIP proxy can nothing but complete two call legs. Aloi-> transition T.38 premature OK (as I described above) make incompatible with devices that are unable to return for T.38 to sound crude.

  What is now? You can turn in level 3 syslog and debug (voice-> System tab) and catch them. It can reveal more about the issue. But I don't know if it can reveal something that allow us to solve the problem. But you need the newspaper if you decide to report the bug to Cisco SMB TAC.

  You can report the bug in the firmware to SMB TAC even if you have no support agreement.

  Despite you have the contract assistance or not, do not put so much hope that Cisco will help you. And zero chance it will not solve the problem within a reasonable time.

• SPA 112 - make calls over WIFI between the lines?

  Dear community

  You just bought a SPA 112 which seems to work very well, except for one thing:

  We do not seem to place calls between them the two lines (long cable between two buildings).

  It sounds but is silent and hang up after making a call and end up on the other side. Any chance of a hint?

  Also curious to know if I need to put something specific for use in Sweden? Seems to work very well, but still.

  Do I edit something else? The dial plan?

  Thanks much for any help!

  Jan A.

  1. What is the long cable? What is the cable type (disclose AWG or diameter).

  2. turn on the syslog & debug (highest level) and catch them. It can help to analyze the issue.

   if I need to set something specific for use in Sweden

  According to your wishes. Your username cannot be content with US progress tones or ring US. You can configure some more appropriate for the Sweden , if you wish. Ring voltage waveform, and frequency of the ring should be configured according to your needs of end-phone. Plan of the PBX the SPA112 is saved as well as the requirement of the user of numbering Plan numbering must follow. There is nothing like "a suitable configuration requirements" plan of numbering - even for a given country, including the Sweden.

• spa 112 with firmware 1.0.2 update (006)

  I recently bought a spa 112 and configured for VoIP provided by my ISP. It works more or less well, but I want to upgrade to the latest firmware to access the display and other options.

  The process of update mentioned by specifying a path where the new firmware is saved in the phone adapter Configuration utility under the administration "tab. In my case, everything that appears on the left side is the quick configuration option. This is true regardless of the current tab is selected.

  Looks like I have an older (1.0.0) hardware and firmware 1.0.2 (006) version. Could someone direct me to the procedure of updating to a more recent firmware?

  Michel

  Hi Michael, the firmware update procedure is to access this section of the unit. Looks like you have a browser problem. Try using different browsers... IE, Mozilla Firefox, Chrome, etc. It is usually Java / related to the security of the browser if the GUI does not load correctly.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• UCS C200 and NIC Teaming/FailOver

  As UCS C200 with management of a 10/100 and 10/100/two interface 1000 interfaces and PCIe with 4NIC

  I want to install CUCM 8.5 is the NIC Teaming/failover supported by UCS C200 and how to set up the NIC Managment interface with failover?

  Thank you.

  Hello

  As you install apps from the CPU on the server of the UCS, speech application team listed their recommendations here.

  http://docwiki.Cisco.com/wiki/QoS_Design_Considerations_for_Virtual_UC_with_UCS#Guidelines_for_Physical_LAN_Links.2C_Trunking_and_Traffic_Sizing

  You can create a NIC teaming in the ESXi via vSphere client software for traffic from from / destined for virtual machines.

  For C200, we have only one management port and if you use the management for MMIC traffic port, switch option is not available.

  However, if you choose to use host for MMIC traffic NETWORK ports, you can set up CIMC NIC mode for 'LOM shared' which provides the NIC teaming options.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/unified_computing/UCS/c/SW/GUI/config/Guide/1.4.1/b_Cisco_UCS_C-Series_GUI_Configuration_Guide_141_chapter_01000.html#concept_AC4EC4E9FA3F4536A26BAD49734F23D0

  HTH

  Padma

• GLC - T allows to connect problem failed validation ucs 6120 and 2960 s (RJ45), are SFP

  Hi, all.

  I use GLC - T to connect ucs 6120 and cisco2960s (RJ45), are sfp validation doesn't have a problem.

  

  I did the speed at 1 G, and then I get error "connection not connected" even, I plugged the cable of nnetwork...

  

  Hello

  I recommend to see if the dealer you bought the glc - t from Exchange.  There seems to be problems with the SFP modules.

• Setting port channel between UCS - FI and MDS 9124 (Mode F)

  Dear team,

  We tried to create the channel of port between UCS FI and MDS 9124

  But the port channel do not take action in mode F on MDS 9124

  FI is in host FC end Mode

  We have allowed FC uplink on FI trunking

  We have activated NPIV on MDS

  We have activated the MDS trunk

  FI and MDS in default VSAN

  To check that we have changed the way FI FC channels mode and switch port became active, but in E mode

  When we enabled CF trunking of uplink on the port mode FI channels and FC Switching became active in mode TE

  but in both cases above, showflogi database shows WWPN of SAN alone does not have the any fi.

  How to achieve this?

  Have read that no need to change the mode switching mode of CF swicthing and keep FC Endhost way

  SO how to channel ports with mode F MDS and FI (Display Mode as NProxy)

  What is it has nothing to do with the MDS NX - OS version? (https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2179129)

  If yes how to put as license for ports came with the camera and we don't have any CAP/PAK or license file as she came

  with license

  Also, we saw 2 files available for download (m9100-s2ek9-kickstart - mz.5.2.8 .bin and m9100-s2ek9 - mz.5.2.8 .bin b b) to use

  Thanks and greetings

  Jose

  Hi Jo Bo.

  What version of the software if your MDS race?

  On your UCS do connect nxos and show ficelleStringString ficelleT inteface and find the mac address.

  It is possible that you could be hitting the bug below. If this is the case, you may need to update the firmware on your MDS.

  Add MAC YES '002a6a', '8c604f', '00defb' for 5 k/UCS-FI

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId= CSCty04686

  Symptom:

  Link change cannot connect any other Nexus or other Cisco Switch in mode VAN with a port channel F.   Question can be viewed in older versions of 5.1

  5.1.3.N1.1a

  but not later

  5.1.3.N2.1c

  Release. Question is also found in

  5.2 (1) N1 (1)

  and

  6.0 (2) N1 (1)

  and later versions.

  Conditions:

  Nexus configured for the link SAN PortChannels or NPIV Nexus mode connected to the UCS via regular F port channel where UCS VAN VAN edge mode switch: YES switch manufactured FI or another Cisco UCS Port WWN: xx:xx:00:2 has: 6a: xx:xx:xx or xx:xx:8 c: 60:4f:xx:xx:xx

  Workaround solution:

  Turn-off on Nexus 5 k TF-port question link mode does not happen with standard F-PORT SAN to remove Portchannel config

  Other Description of the problem:

  To check question collect please see the flogi-event history internal errors whenever the port is attempted OLS, AMENDMENTS, PBA counters will increment. This can be determined via the following output, view port internal info to see all the internal-historic port of error events

• UCS FI and iSCSI storage

  We are poised to implement a UCS B Series. I have a question for FI 6248UP. I have read and used the emulator for UCS Manager and noticed that you can configure ports FI as ways for storage material. Is it limited to a certain protocol storage or the seller? We use Dell EQ and plan to be there to connect the EQ 6510 X. I was wondering if that is supported and if iSCSI upstream traffic would be able to access the storage?

  The 6248UPs will be passed to a pair of Catalyst 4506-E race vs. We have an IBM chassis and servers should be able to access the EQ6510X too. I guess I just need master iSCSI VLANS for the 6248UP and the servers would have access?

  Thank you!

  Hi Cowetac,

  Yes, not all storage arrays are supported by UCS, but your DELL Equalogic is supported. If you have any questions about the other compatibility of storage arrays, you can take a look at the UCS (see link below) storage interoperability matrix.

  UCS storage interoperability Matrix (matrix of the storage of UCS - B of table 10-2)

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/switches/Datacenter/MDS9000/interoperability/matrix/Matrix8.html

  I guess I just need master iSCSI VLANS for the 6248UP and the servers would have access?

  Depends, if you use one port of the device the UCS for you connect directly to storage, you can use a single vlan.

  If you are connected via the Ethernet uplinks via a switch, you need to set your switches as a trunk port.

• SPA 112 Port Sip does not change

  Good day, there is a problem with spa 112. I want to use the different sip as 23405 port, I have change in web graphical interface under SIP PORT is aplied but really no, spa 112 continue to connect on port 5060? y at - it any resolution to this problem? version is 1.4.0

  Peripheral SPA are supported in the SMB community, you might want to settle this.

• change the width of the video image from 720 to 540 and lose part of the picture.

  When I import a video .mpg in first pro (trial version) cc for a reason any image size going from 720 to width 540 and I lose the right part of the image.

  Anyone know why this happens or how to fix?

  I have also one finds that the video is going on since with the audio and to fix it, I had to put the video to 100.16% speed/duration. any ideas how to stop what is happening?

  There is something in the latest versions of file structure first dislikes.

  If there is a point in the project, download CS6 first trial version.

  Download Adobe CS6 Trials: Direct links (without Assistant or Manager) | ProDesignTools

  Read the instructions carefully before you download.

• UCS B200M3 and Flex Flash (SD card)

  Hello

  I migrate fews UCS B200M3 to boot from SAN SD card because it is supported by the firmware 2.1.

  I am running the latest firmware, 2.1(1a) and ESXi 5.1.0 1157734 with a custom image from Cisco.

  After a few days, my lost ESX connectivity with SD card and in vSphere it is said: connectivity lost unit mpx.vmhba32:C0:T0:L0 supporting system startup files... (see attachment) (I got the error one all my ESX on SD card).

  If I restart the agent management ESX or reboot, the message disappeared and everything works.

  There is a problem with ESXi 5.1 on SDCard and B200M3?

  Thank you

  Hello

  At this point, we are trying to see if the problem is related to the one seen on C-series.

  I'll try to update you in a few days, if not, please post again here as a reminder so I can update you.

  -Kenny

• UCS-C200M2 and the performance of the 1980s...

  Has anyone deployed UCS C200 M2 boxes and tried to team onboard gigabit interfaces? I'm void Mbps deployed VM CUCM 8.5.1 performance using the prescribed Cisco 1000 user model. I ran the NIC and stand alone teams and get the same result, seriously bad performance. I have a Dell 2970 on the same switch running ESXi and am pulling almost gigabit wirline her. The two are running EXSi 4.1. Both are associated by using the road based on the hash of the IP. Same downloads from the ESXi host IP address is dead slow.

  Please open a TAC service request because we need more information about this configuration.

  Just a quick check. You have all the traffic shaping configured on the virtual switch on the ESXi host output ports?

  HTH

  Padma

• VMware vSphere/ESXi 5.5 - UCS B230M2 and B200M supported?

  Any idea when the UCS B200M1/2/3 and B230M2 blades will be certified for vSphere 5.5?

  I see that the C-Series servers are already on the list, but none of the B series blades.

  Hello Kris,

  According to the current schedule UCS HCL for ESXi 5.5 support will be updated before the end of October.

  HTH

  Padma

• UCS/Nexus and FCoE Question

  Hi all:

  Can we connect a FCoE target directly to an interconnection of fabric or a Nexus 5xxx CWF in NPV mode and not connected to an FC switch for power and tissue services continue to have the initiator see the target and be able to supply storage as a result?

  Thus, the scenario would be the following:

  a server rack with an ANC connected to a Nexus 5xxx CWF in NPV mode

  OR

  a server blade a NON related to interconnection of UCS fabric (which is also a CWF) in VAN mode

  AND

  In the above cases, there is NO CONNECTION between the RTC and an FC switch.

  I will be able to have the ANC (FCoE initiator) see table of Strorage (FCoE target)?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Yes you are right. For the direct-attached storage work, you need the FI in FC switch mode. Your explanation is good and you can not storage direct-attached mode/npv end FC host mode. With FI in npv mode, it can just transfer CF applications to an NPIV switch and cannot process any request CF as FLOGI etc...

  In addition, in the UCS versions under 2.1 you need a SAN switch connected to a FI running in mode switching and storage directly connected to it, which can push the FI database zoning. Thanks to 2.1, you can have storage direct-attached without the need for any SAN switch upstream as we have zoning capabilities in UCS now.

  In short, for all direct-attached storage, you must have FI FC Switching mode.

  -Ganesh

• Can FI UCS level and Server 2.1.2 upgrade to 2.2.1?

  Dear all,

  Is it possible to update firmware FI and Server 2.1.2 running to the latest 2.2.1?

  Or should I upgrade current firemware 2.1.2 to 2.1.3 and then upgrade to the latest 2.2.1?

  Take a look on: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/unified_computing/ucs/sw/upgrading/... You can update to 2.2 any 2.1, more if you want to support the cross-version of the software, you must be on 2.1.3. M.