Unable to connect to a LAN internal via vpn

Similar Questions

• Unable to connect to the NAS network via a wired connection?

  Hi all

  I have 2 network NAS. They are both a Bay D-Link ShareCenter 2. One is full of media I use for streaming and the other is used to keep backups of my computers and some software. Both of the NAS are configured in RAID mirror. They both worked fine when I got them almost a year ago, they are mapped to letters pilot Y and Z. 2 days when I logged my office a popup notification came to say.
  "cannot reconnect to all network drives, click here to check the status of your network drives."
  so I checked it status and he said they were offline. I restarted my computer and both the NAS, but it made no difference. Then I tried to disconnect the drives, but when I try to reconnect to them I get this error;
  "Windows cannot access \\192.168.0.32\Volume_1\Joe, check the spelling of the name. Otherwise, there could be a problem with your network. In an attempt to identify and solve network problems, click on diagnose. »
  When I click to diagnose it is unable to find a default.
  The next thing I did was disable my Ethernet card and connect to my network with my WiFi adapter. Then I tried to re - map the NAS is connected via the wireless. This time he allowed me to map them and they seem to work as usual via the wireless connection, but it is rather slow on the wireless.
  Then I disconnected my WiFi connection and reactivated my Ethernet card. When I tried to open the NAS I get this error message;

  "An error occurred while reconnecting Z: to \\192.168.0.32\Volume_1\Joe, Microsoft Windows network: the local device name is already in use." This connection has not been restored. »

  A friend told me that this error was because the drive letter is used by a USB storage device or remembered from a previous session, and to remedy, I should run these 2 commands CMD;
  NET use * / Delete Yes
  NET use / persistent: no
  After you run the two orders, nothing has been changed still the same problem. I also I have no USB storage device so it may be that.
  The next thing I tried was to ping both the NAS, I did this on Ethernet and WiFi connections, and both times I return a normal response both to the NAS.
  I defrosted then to restore an image from my Office I made around a week ago and I know that I don't have this problem at the time. The image I did was with Acronis. When I started on the CD of Acronis support, I discovered that Acronis software could connect both the NAS on my desktop Ethernet. After restoring I still have the same problem.
  Now, there's 1 thing I noticed, my laptop can still connect to both WiFi and Ethernet NAS with all the problems. I also have an android phone, and who can connect both of the NAS via a WiFi connection.
  1 last thing you to know is I can always get to the configuration of the NAS so pages I visit it local address in a web browser. I also ran a factory reset both the NAS and then re-applied my own settings. This does not solve the problem, and more that turning March my routers.
  Please can someone help me solve this problem. I'm running a Windows 8 Pro 64 Bit operating system. If you need more information on my system spec or how I have my setup of home network please let me know.
  Thank you Joe.

  This problem has now been fixed.

  For some reason any my AVG firewall had defrosted on its own to block access to the features as well as to define its self to disable the file and printer sharing of files on the NAS share.
  So a small trick to my firewall and everything works as it should.
  Thank you Joe.

• Unable to connect to the MKS: internal error

  After you add the hosts to vCenter, when I try to KIKILA the VMRC, I get the error: could not connect to the MKS: internal error

  First of all, this isn't the usual DNS resolution of Host IP addresses MKS error! This is something totally different.

  An unusual thing in the manifestation of this problem which is to turn it off (completely off, not a reboot) and then turn the virtual machine in question, the console will work for this virtual machine, but the console continues to malfunction for the other virtual machines on the same host until these virtual machines are vMotioned or completely powered by bicycle!

  Here's the workflow:

  1. I have to stand up a new ESXi (patched and firmwared to the latest updates)
  2. I build a Windows or Linux VM to serve DNS and/or be an AD domain controller
  3. I have install the VCSA (or Windows vCenter)
     1. I connect and test forward and reverse the resolution for all hosts in the Broadcast domain
  4. I add the ESXi host (and all other hosts) to vCenter
  5. I try to open a VMRC and get the MKS error!

  It is a minor problem, with the exception of the VCSA himself!

  Any ideas?

  I had the same exact symptoms as you. Fortunately, I was able to find this link:

  http://KB.VMware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalID=2116542

  Looks like we have a need is power off and turn it back on, suspend and energy back or vMotion to another host to resolve. I guess it has to do with the generation of a new SSL certificate when joining a host to vCenter? I checked that at least the first two options work, so I hope that answers your question.

• Portege R500: unable to connect the remote DVI monitor via Dynadock

  Hello

  I just connected Dynadock (DVI) with my Portege R500. The cell would be supported - according to Toshiba - but my experience confirms that Dynadock is not able to access the DVI ports. This implies, that Dynadock is nothing more than the USB HUB.

  My setup: Vista 32 company b (CZE edition), the latest patches, Toshiba R500.

  Software: latest dynadock software 2.3 c.

  Symptom: I can't connect to the remote DVI monitor via the dynadock, there are only two external panels with 800 x 600, but Vista does not allow me to choose.

  More information: software Dynadock requires to run without Microsoft Defender, otherwise it blocks the service: DisplayLinkService; file:C:\Program Files\DisplayLink base Software\DisplayLinkService.exe
  If you turn off the MSDef, the "error 2738" message appears when you connect the dynadock and when Vista tries to install a missing drivers for you.
  Yes, I know the VBS question and the problem is not caused by VisualBasic - VBS "Hello World" runs.

  If you think always, Toshiba Dynadock is compatible with Toshiba R500, then press Fn + F5 and look at your logs and you should find something like:
  In English: igfxext.exe throws an exception 0xc000000d, offset 0x0000f9f8.

  I look forward to the comments, advice etc. If you are able to transmit this bug report to a responsible engineer, do please.

  Hello Leo

  As far as I know, Toshiba has not designed for laptops models own only Dynadock and it can be used on every laptop or fixed. Because of this, I think that this statement about model of care is not so important for this problem.

  Toshiba provides devices and software. To connect using the USB port, and these ports must each computer or laptop. I hope that you have installed the software by following the on-screen instructions (device of should not be connected to the start-up of the plant).

  Is your Portege docked the host or you have connected Dynadock directly in Portege s USB port?

• Ping LAN internal via the IPSec VPN Client

  It's my scenario.

  Software Version 7.2 (1)

  I activated the VPN in the external Interface. The IPSec Client pool is in the range 192.168.98.150 - 192.168.98.175.

  • Allowed "a whole icmp" out Interface access both within the Interface.
  • ICMP & ICMP error inspection is enabled.
  • NAT-control is disabled.

  Clients are unable to ping any IP within the LAN 'inside' but at the same time, they are able to access the devices in the LAN using HTTP, HTTPS, SSH & TELNET.

  CASE 1:

  access-list SHEEP extended permits all ip 192.168.98.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (Inside) 0 access-list SHEEP

  I get the following log "translation portmap creation failed for CBC icmp outdoors"

  CASE 2:

  If I add a static 192.168.98.0 public (exterior, Interior) 192.168.98.0 netmask 255.255.255.0

  I am able to Ping and the problem is solved.

  Could someone explain please this behavior?

  1. Why ICMP only needs a NAT device when TCP & UDP traffic works very well.
  2. Why a portmap translation error? Why not dynamic identity NAT?

  Hello

  So he was correspondent to a configuration 'nat' on the 'outside' interface that had no configuration corresponding 'global' for the destination (probably inside) interface which caused problems and produces the 'portmap' error.

  Please do not forget to mark an answer as the correct answer, if she answered your question or useful rate responses

  -Jouni

• Unable to connect to vSphere vSphere Client via

  I just finished installed/configured VMware Hypervisor on HP Proliant DL380 G7 Server 5.1.0. Here is the error I got when you connect to the host via vSphere Client:

  

  In the hypervisor, network cards, the static IP address that I have is related to the vmnic0 list below.

  

  Please let me know if this is incorrect.

  And in the DNS Configuration, I put the primary and auxiliary DNS server to match ours. Then the hostname is replaced by CompanyHost.

  

  Again, please let me know if my setup is incorrect. If it's any good, I wonder why connect to this host does not work. Any suggestion is appreciated.

  1. as long as a single port is plugged in, you're fine. In any case, I suggest that you check the connections to ensure a proper wiring. The network ports on the DL380G7 count right on the left! (see HP product Bulletin)

  2-3. DNS resolution is not critical at all for a single host, but should be in place in case you want to add the host to vCenter server environment.

  André

• Unable to connect to the virtual machine via telnet

  Hi all

  The VM on Vcenter everything is perfect with the network connection. I can't do a ping of the virtual machine remotely but I can not connect via telnet.

  For the same reason? And even more, I have disabled the fiewalls of the virtual machine (Windows 2008 R2).

  The error that says: could not open connection to the host, on port 23: Connect failed

  Can you please let me know how to solve this problem?

  Since there is nothing blocking the traffic of the virtual machine in ESXi, you can begin troubleshooting in the guest OS. For example is running telnet server and configured to accept connections?

  André

• Unable to connect to the Web comments via browser host server or by using NAT mode or bridge

  Guest operating system: RHEL 5.5 - 64 bit

  OS: Win XP SP3 (hardware is 64-bit capable... just running a 32-bit operating system for compatibility business app... ugh)

  VMWare Player 3

  I am running tomcat on my guest OS and connect via browser (IE 8/FF3.6.3) host operating system. I can't get the correct configuration at all. I tried NAT modes and bridge and doesn't seem to work. I tried VMware Player 2.5 and the last 3, but I can't hit my tomcat instance. I can access it from inside the virtual machine without any problem, so I know that my tomcat is running.

  Any help on where to start is appreciated.

  NAT mode worked fine on my old (also 64 bit) CentOS5 VM a year ago but I do not have access to this virtual machine more.

  Welcome to the forums!

  Disable all firewalls on the client and the host.

  Turn off TCP Chimney on the host:

  1. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\TCPIP\Parameters\DisableTaskOffload

  Set this value to 1 disables all unloading task since the TCP/IP transport protocol. Set this value to zero allows all unloading task.

  AWo

  VCP 3 & 4

  Author @ vmwire.net

  \[:o]===\[o:]

  = You want to have this ad as a ringtone on your mobile phone? =

  = Send 'Assignment' to 911 for only $999999,99! =

• Unable to connect to the BC site via dreamweaver CC 2014

  All of a sudden I can't connect to one of my BC sites in Dreamweaver CC 2014

  I get the error: "an FTP error occurred - cannot connect to the host." The remote host cannot be found. »

  On the web, I can properly connect to the back end of the BC site with my credentials to mysite.businesscatalyst.com

  I tried the following:

  1 disabled the firewall and tried to connect through DW. Did not help.

  2 boot safe mode with networking. Did not help.

  3. in the Manager Site Dreamweaver, Site for mysite configuration, password box is empty. I can manually enter and click on 'test' and it connects fine.

  4. when I leave the site manager and try to connect from the files tab and icon of the little plug, it does not work.

  5. we forget the password and sometimes white in a re-opening of the Site Manager.

  Hi guys,.

  I just tested this question (of the BC point of view) and I think I understood what may be your problem - you have multiple sites defined in DW and some of them (those having the connection problem) do not belong to the Adobe Id of current user who is logged in DW.

  The new CC authentication system is synchronized between your installed applications of CC. For any operation that requires authentication, current CC authenticated account credentials are used - it is also why doe of information of the site DW SFTP connection not stores the password more.

  Workaround for this problem is to be registered for the DW with an Id Adobe user that is also stored in the settings of credentials SFTP site DW (BC) that you want to use.

  There are two approaches to this:

  1. change the current CC account that is signed in DW:

  -disconnection of DW (using the menu)

  -Connect with the Adobe Id which is the (partner) creator of the site

  -restart DW (this is important!)

  2. Add the Adobe Id account as an Admin user to the BC location:

  -Add the Adobe Id account that you use in DW and other CC apps as the administrator user on the site of BC (go to settings of the Site from the site Admin-> Admin users)

  -in DW, change the SFTP site connection settings (of the files Panel, double-click the drop-down menu display the site name and select servers, change the server list and simply replace the value of @adobe.com [myadobeId]of the user name field with the email in the current account of CC, which is signed in DW; you'll have something like) (: [myBCsite].worldsecuresystems.com/[myNewadobeId]@adobe.com/dw)

  -Save settings (skip the password)

  I hope this helps.

  Ionut

• Access PIX NIC canoe internal via VPN

  Hello

  We have a customer with a PIX 515 we installed and we have a private network virtual of our office to them. We communicate to all their guests behind the PIX over the good VPN configuration (telnet) and monitoring (SNMP). We want to control the PIX via snmp as well. We are unable to access the internal ip address of the NIC through the VPN. We can not ping, telnet or use SNMP to it.

  The VPN works great as I said above, but is there anything else I need to do to allow access to the internal IP of NIC address?

  This is the normal behavior of Pix. You cannot communicate with a Pix interface unless it's the only one to receive the traffic. Therefore, you can monitor and communicate with the outside/IP of the Pix from the Web interface.

  BTW... This changed in Pix v6.3 that came out yesterday. You can use the command [management-access] to manage your Pix using his IP address private through a VPN tunnel.

• Unable to connect to the client to site VPN

  Hello

  Suddenly this morning I couldn't connect to the VPN from my work. I did not update the operating system or any other application in my Mac. I checked with my VPN provider and all is well. I tried to connect to the VPN from another PC and the connection was successful.

  It of weird, can you help me on this?

  Thank you

  My Info:

  OS X El Capitan

  Version 10.11.6 (15-1004)

  Error log:

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: agreed to the takeover of vpn connection.

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: IPSec to connect to the server 50.57.56.150

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: connection.

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: IPSec Phase 1 started (initiated by me).

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Initiator, Aggressive Mode 1 message).

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: > > > > > status of phase change = Phase 1 began by us

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: no message must be encrypted, 0x14a1, side 0 status

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: IPSec to connect to the server 50.57.56.150

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: connection.

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: IPSec Phase 1 started (initiated by me).

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Initiator, Aggressive Mode 1 message).

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: > > > > > status of phase change = Phase 1 began by us

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: port 62465 anticipated, but 0

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: IKEv1 Phase 1 AUTH: success. (Initiator, aggressive-Mode Message 2).

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: > > > > > status of phase change = Phase 1 began with a peer

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: IKE Packet: receive a success. (Initiator, Aggressive Mode 2 message).

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: initiating IKEv1 Phase 1: success. (Initiator, aggressive Mode).

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Initiator, Aggressive Mode 3 message).

  7 September 11:17:57 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: IPSec Phase 1 established (initiated by me).

  7 September 11:18:05 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]!: jumped to retransmit the frags: frag_flags 1, r-> sendbuf-> l 136, max 1280

  7 September 11:18:05 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: retransmitted packet received from the 50.57.56.150 [500].

  7 September 11:18:05 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: the packet is retransmitted by 50.57.56.150 [500].

  7 September 11:18:13 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]!: jumped to retransmit the frags: frag_flags 1, r-> sendbuf-> l 136, max 1280

  7 September 11:18:13 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: retransmitted packet received from the 50.57.56.150 [500].

  7 September 11:18:13 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: the packet is retransmitted by 50.57.56.150 [500].

  7 September 11:18:21 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]!: jumped to retransmit the frags: frag_flags 1, r-> sendbuf-> l 136, max 1280

  7 September 11:18:21 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: retransmitted packet received from the 50.57.56.150 [500].

  7 September 11:18:21 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: the packet is retransmitted by 50.57.56.150 [500].

  7 September 11:18:27 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: IPSec disconnection from the server 50.57.56.150

  7 September 11:18:27 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: IKE Packet: forward the success. (Information message).

  7 September 11:18:27 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: IKEv1-Information Notice: pass success. (Delete the ISAKMP Security Association).

  7 September 11:18:27 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: glob found no match for the path "/ var/run/racoon/*.conf".

  7 September 11:18:27 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: IPSec disconnection from the server 50.57.56.150

  September 7 11:18:27 Gerards-MacBook-Pro UserNotificationCenter [682]: * ATTENTION: the method in the class userSpaceScaleFactor NSWindow is discouraged on 10.7 and later versions. It should not be used in new applications. Use convertRectToBacking: instead.

  7 September 11:18:29 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: connection.

  7 September 11:18:29 racoon Gerards-MacBook-Pro [680]: unknown information exchange has received.

  Establish a virtual private network connection-

• Unable to connect to other remote access (ASA) VPN clients

  Hello

  I have a cisco ASA 5510 appliance configured with remote VPN access

  I can connect all hosts on the INSIDE and DMZ network, but not able to access other clients connected to the same VPN.

  For example, if I have 2 clients connected to the VPN, customer and CustomerB, with a pool of vpn IP addresses such as 10.40.170.160 and 10.40.170.161 respectively, these two clients are not able to communicate with each other.

  Any help is welcome.

  Thanks in advance.

  Hello

  I'm a little rusty on the old format NAT, but would be what I would personally try to configure NAT0 on the 'outer' interface.

  It seems to me that you currently have dynamic PAT configured for the VPN users you have this

  NAT (outside) 1 10.40.170.0 255.255.255.0

  If your traffic is probably corresponding to it.

  The only thing I can think of at the moment would be to configure

  Note of VPN-CLIENT-NAT0-access-list NAT0 for traffic between VPN Clients

  list of access VPN-CLIENT-NAT0 permit ip 10.40.170.0 255.255.255.0 10.40.170.0 255.255.255.0

  NAT (outside) 0-list of access VPN-CLIENT-NAT0

  I don't know if it works. I did not really have to configure it on any ASAs running older software. There was some similar questions here on the forums for the new format.

  -Jouni

• Unable to connect to the site Web SSL VPN with firewall zone configured

  I recently updated my 2911 company and set up a firewall area.  This is my first experience with this and I used Cisco Configuration Professional to build the configuration of the firewall first and then edited the names to make it readable by humans.  The only problem I can't solve is to learn site Web SSL VPN from outside.  I can navigate the website and connect without problem from the inside, and even if it was useful to verify that the Routing and the site work properly it is really not what I.  I don't get anything on the syslog for drops because of the firewall server, or for any other reason but packet capture show that no response is received when you try to navigate to the outside Web site.  I am currently using a customer VPN IPSEC solution until I can get this to work and have no problem with it.  I have attached a sanitized with the included relevant lines configuration (deleted ~ 400 lines including logging, many inspections on the movement of the area to the area and the ipsec vpn, which I already mentioned).  I searched anything about this problem and no one has no problem connecting to their Web site, just to get other features to work correctly.  All thoughts are welcome.

  See the security box

  area to area

  Members of Interfaces:

  GigabitEthernet0/0.15

  GigabitEthernet0/0.30

  GigabitEthernet0/0.35

  GigabitEthernet0/0.45

  area outside zone

  Members of Interfaces:

  GigabitEthernet0/1

  sslvpn area area

  Members of Interfaces:

  Virtual-Template1

  SSLVPN-VIF0

  I tried to change the composition of the area on the interface virtual-Template1 to the outside the area nothing helps.

  See the pair area security

  Name of the pair area SSLVPN - AUX-in

  Source-Zone sslvpn-area-zone of Destination in the area

  Service-SSLVPN-AUX-IN-POLICY

  Name of the pair area IN SSLVPN

  Source-Zone in the Destination zone sslvpn-zone

  service-policy IN SSLVPN-POLICY

  Name of the pair area SELF SSLVPN

  Source-Zone sslvpn-area free-zone Destination schedule

  Service-SELF-to-SSLVPN-POLICY

  Zone-pair name IN-> AUTO

  Source-Zone in the Destination zone auto

  Service-IN-to-SELF-POLICY policy

  Name of the pair IN-> IN box

  In the Destination area source-Zone in the area

  service-policy IN IN-POLICY

  Zone-pair name SELF-> OUT

  Source-Zone auto zone of Destination outside the area

  Service-SELF-AUX-OUT-POLICY

  Name of the pair OUT zone-> AUTO

  Source-Zone out-area Destination-area auto

  Service-OUT-to-SELF-POLICY

  Zone-pair name IN-> OUT

  Source-Zone in the Destination area outside zone

  service-strategy ALLOW-ALL

  The pair OUT zone name-> IN

  Source-out-zone-time zone time Zone of Destination in the area

  Service-OUT-to-IN-POLICY

  Name of the pair area SSLVPN-to-SELF

  Source-Zone-Zone of sslvpn-area auto

  Service-SSLVPN-FOR-SELF-POLICY

  I also tried to add a pair of area for the outside zone sslvpn-zone passing all traffic and it doesn't change anything.

  The area of networks

  G0/0.15

  172.16.0.1 26

  G0/0.30

  172.16.0.65/26

  G0/0.35

  172.16.0.129/25

  G0/0.45

  172.18.0.1 28

  Pool of SSL VPN

  172.20.0.1 - 172.20.0.14

  Latest Version of IOS:

  Cisco IOS software, software C2900 (C2900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.0 (1) M10, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)

  Glad works now. Weird question, no doubt.

  I guess that on the deployment guide said that the firewall will not support inspection of TCP to the free zone, however, class nested maps are used to accomplish this, to be completely honest, I think it's a mess and the best thing to do is action past to auto for the protocols that you want and then drop the rest.

  Let us know if you have any other problems.

  Mike

• Unable to connect to the internet via ethernet.

  Unable to connect to the internet via ethernet.

  You have published a statement... is not an issue. You have a question?

  Do you mean that you try to use Ethernet for Internet connection? OR are you asking how to connect to Internet if Ethernet is not possible?

• Unable to connect with the network via iphone or ipad

  Unable to connect the Apple TV (2nd generation) with the network via Wi - Fi using the remote app!

  The remote application required the devices to be on the same network, and home sharing enabled on Apple TV. The physical remote control would be necessary for the installation if this has not been done already