Upgrade to Cisco VCS

Similar Questions

• Restricting calls between a subarea and specific extensions on Cisco VCS

  Hello, I use Cisco VCS 8.5.3, my goal is to restrict calls between a subarea and specific extensions.
  I tried following solutions:

  1. Download of XML strategy
  2. Use of political appeal web interface in order to limit calls

  XML file:

  
   
   

  
   
     
     

  
     
     

  
     
     

  
       
     

  
     
   

  
  
  

  But when I apply the XML file, or try using the web simple rule (for example: 11111 12222 destination source, dismiss the action) I'm still able to place the call to 11111 to 12222.

  What can be the cause of the problem and what else can I try to be able to prohibit calls between a particular Subzone and exentions?

  Attached, is an example of CPL script that should work.  Using this script, CPL, I was able to block calls to a subarea set to a destination alias located in the subzone of default and was always able to call any other end point in the default subfield without problem.  Note that you must enter the name of the subarea, as you have configured on the VCS, including spaces if they exist.

  The scenario is based on the example of CPL "limiting access to a local gateway" X8.5 VCS Administrator's Guide on pg 413, other documents of CPL reference and examples can be seen starting on pg 410.

• Cisco VCS and MCU - Conference does not

  Dear community members

  I have problems in the VCS configuration to work with the MCU to join to several endpoints in a conference. The components that I use:

  -Cisco VCS control v8.7.

  -Cisco 5300 MCU 5310 v 4.5 (1.72)

  -3 x SX20 end points

  I recorded every endpoint and MCU on VCS, but I'm not able to do a conference call 3-way, the only option is 1 video and 1 audio (I disabled the Multisite option). It seems that VCS does not yet call the MCU in the game.

  Kindly help us with it.

  Can you tell us how you set up the Conference and how you have configured MCU and endpoints?

  From the sounds of it, you call each end point of one of the SX20s, but you must call simply directly in the Conference on the MCU.  If you want to have a conference point to point between two end points and then degenerate into a multipoint conference on the MCU, you must configure Multiway.

  With the help of Multiway with Cisco TelePresence systems

• Vcs Tandberg and Cisco VCS control

  Hello

  I have a client with an old would invest video and new servers.

  Old video servers

  Control system Tandberg video Communication Server - part number = 117500

  Application of Tandberg video Communication Server Expressway - part number = 1163402

  New video servers:

  VCS License Control - Part Number - R-VMVCS-CTRL-K9

  VCS Expressway License - Part Number - R-VMVCS-EXPWY-K9

  According to Cisco x8.2 Clustering:

  -Each peer runs on a hardware platform with equivalent functionality; for example, you cannot cluster one
  peer running on one core 2 average VM with peers running on base 8 large virtual machines

  Means that the physical old VCS cannot be grouped with new virtual VCS.

  Thank you.

  Hi zizou.

  You can include a device VCS with a VCS VM as long as their matches of software and their hardware platforms have equivalent capabilities.

  Device VCS clustered with VCS VM running on core 2 MediumVM = YES

  VCS machine clustered with VCS VM running on 8 cores LargeVM = No.

  "you can even cluster that are running on the standard devices with peers running on core 2 Medium VMs, but you can not group a peer running on a standard unit with peers running on base 8 large virtual machines.

  (p.4)

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/Telepresence/infrastructure/VCs/config_guide/x8-7/Cisco-VCs-cluster-creation-and-maintenance-deployment-guide-x8-7.PDF

• Cisco VCS - C keeps filling in Purge on MSDS systems

  Hello

  I have a very weird question that is quite difficult to explain. We had a few failures of Fan on my Cisco VCS - C and we did a RMA number and received a new one. I installed this VCS in April this year. I start then notice every time we add a new system to their MSDS ID TMS is of the order of 2860. We have only 42 systems at this stage. Then I noticed when I'm in the systems tab Purge TMS keep my new Cisco VCS - C, populating the name of the system and the type of system, this product about 2800 times. Someone else experiencing something similar to this?

  I'll try to purge these systems, the only thing is that this happen, what can I do else do I completely purge my VCS of TMS and readd it?

  TMS system IDs are generated by TMS and increases when you add several systems.  You might be able to change the ID of the SQL database, systems are stored in the dbo.objSystem table, but I do not recommend because the ID of the system could be used elsewhere and you can potentially break TMS and make things worse.

• Cisco VCS Expressway / Starter Pack = part number / Option key

  Hello

  I m a bit confused about ordering cisco information. My document: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/unified-communications/...

  First what we want to do. Quick and short: LAN-MCU -/- DMZ-VCSE VM -/-

  -set up a new environment VCSE only for remote workers.

  -ensure the video service just over the internet for Jabber and SIP/h.323 conference systems

  -only the MCU as a peripheral local registerd to provide several conferences

  That share and option key is therefore the best choice?

  Our plan:

  VCSE:

  R VMVCS-EXPWY-K9 (comes with the Cisco telepresence video Communication Server(OVA file) Network Interface feature, characteristic of the motorway, gateway functionality, 1800 TURN relay Option, VCS-Dual)

  1. what inscriptions? There are 2500 built-in?
  2 what of interoperability feature for h.323/SIP? CAN´t find in the list options.

  Options:

  LIC-VCSE-50, LIC-VCS-OCS

  Now the thing of Jabber:

  We want to connect on WAN Jabber clients. This is why the VCSE STRATER PACK has the nice feature of 50 video of Jabber Cisco TelePresence licenses with management in there. But if we get that the CTI-VCS-STPAK-K9 instead of the VCSEVM, we have a limitation of 50 records and 10 calls trasversal, right? Only then the VCSE is intresting (culture and systems to support), but we want the Jabber options on it without buying an MSD.

  1 can we install the CTI-VCS-STPAK-K9 key as an option on the VCSEVM and Jabber use 50 records without losing other features of Highway?
  2 or is it possible to install the CTI-VCSE-SPUPG-K9 key as an option to enable Cisco Jabber 100 user on this VCSEVM?

  Or do we buy the CTI-TMS-SW-K9 with LIC-MOVI-25 (the different today: LIC-JAB-MOB-25, LIC-TMS-EP-25)

  Thanks a lot for answering

  One of the first things I would consider on VCS Starter Pack is that it is almost end of sale, first of September 2014, so think of this forward.

  / EOS-EOL-Notice-C51 - 731300.html

  • What these records? There are 2500 built-in?
    • A single VCS will support up to 2500 records out of the box with a valid key.
  • As for the functionality of H323/SIP Interworking?
    • Interoperability is supported out of the box as long as no separate option key not required.
  • Options: LIC-VCSE-50, LIC-VCS-OCS
    • LIC-VCS-OCS is necessary only if you plan to integrate with Microsoft OCS/Lync VCS, otherwise it is not necessary, especially for the video of Jabber.
  • Can we install the CTI-VCS-STPAK-K9 key as an option on the VCSEVM and Jabber use 50 records without losing other features of Highway?
    • The VCS Starter Pack is a separate server from the VCS control and highway.
  • Or is it possible to install the CTI-VCSE-SPUPG-K9 key as an option to enable Cisco Jabber 100 user on this VCSEVM?
    • It is possible to upgrade a VCS Starter Pack for VCS control or a highway, but you will lose the original pack starter call licenses and Jabber video optoins, like they are not transferable.  The licenses or options you have purchases on top of the basic starter pack will however is transferable.
  • Or do we buy the CTI-TMS-SW-K9 with LIC-MOVI-25 (the different today: LIC-JAB-MOB-25, LIC-TMS-EP-25)
    • If you buy the VCS Starter Pack, it will manage the delivery of Jabber video for you.  If you buy a highway of VCS, you can also buy MSD and install Extension of provisioning of TMS is free.  To use TMSPE, you will need provisioning option keys installed in TMS, the difference between the start-up option keys are simply the types of devices you can fund, all kind of do the same thing really, but for the video of Jabber, you want to ICA-MOVI-XX.

• The upgrade of control VCS v7.2.2 to 8.1

  Happy new year!

  I saw the 8.1 release notes

  "Before you upgrade to X 8 or later, if you use Agent TMS (legacy mode) for commissioning you must first migrate from Extension Cisco TelePresence Management Suite Provisioning"

  In our VCS, I have the alarm - "Configuration warning - VCS runs in a legacy of the Agent mode TMS;" It is recommended to switch your system to use another mode.

  I guess this VCS was used with an MSD, but now we do not have a.

  How can I get rid of this alarm and upgrade to 8.1 VCS?

  I found that this configuration is the config FindMe, but we have no option to FindMe key now and he is not active.

  I hope that I have explained the problem as clear as possible.

  Best regards

  Kiril

  You can do a factory reset after you be logged in as root, however, he will wipe away everything, including details of intellectual property.

  Your best option is to contact TAC, explain what you want to do and what has kept the data you need and ask them to arrange a re-flash to the system via USB key. (In your case, it seems that you can simply remove the key from the commissioning, however, you should also check that the details of external management have been erased.)

  Edit: See your last post it looks a lot like a factory reset is in order, it will recreate the image on the system and clean the database as well, but like I said above, contact TAC for a re-USB flash file.

  /Jens

  Please note the answers and score the questions as "answered" as appropriate.

• integration of lync 2013 with cisco vcs - c

  Hello

  I found a lot of documentation on integrating to Lync 2010 with VCS - C, but can't find much on the integration of Lync 2013.  Could someone shine some light on this for me?
  Thank you!

  Hi, David,.

  It would be preferable that you contacted Cisco re: integration

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/thread/2181356

  Cisco PDF

  Or try to repost your question to the TechNet Forum

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/ocsinterop/thread/319f9e94-f7ec-4c6e-994C-f5412e345e2e

• Cisco VCS and integration Lync2013

  Hello!

  Could you tell me please, when CISCO officially support Lync2013 - free new software for VCS - C and documentation on integration?

  The main interest is the possibility of transferring video between CISCO/MCU and Lync endpoints on the H.264 Protocol, who hails from Lync2013.

  Right now, I've got VCS - C and RTM Lync2013 X7.2. During the video call without AMGW appeal established as audio only.

  When using with Lync2010, it worked on Protocol H.263 and CIF resolution.

  Evgeniy salvation,

  We are currently investigating the possibilities to achieve interoperability between Lync 2013, VCS and video devices on the side of the VCS standards-based, it is a work in progress and at this stage, it is to early to provide any factual information on when interop will be available.

  In contrast to Lync 2010, Lync 2013 does not support H.263 for video and it so that will remove the OCS/Lync integration. I do however think that you should be able to make a two-way video between Lync 2013 and VCS-joined endpoints if you use an AMGW tried that yet?

  Thank you

  Andreas

• The upgrade to Cisco ACS

  Hello.

  I would like to upgrade our current ACS NT Terminalserver edition server to a Win2000 server. Since this upgrade requires a fresh installation (since a direct upgrade from NT 4 TS to w2k is not the best thing to do). My question is, do I have to do to ensure that I can keep my user database active? Is replication the answer? And replication will make a copy of all the different users/groups/routers etc etc. In other words, I'll be able to do this upgrade without too much trouble?

  I speak here of a replication of the database, do not configure replication between servers ACS.

  Here is the doc that will help you to do this

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/access/acs_soft/csacs4nt/csnt30/user/AE.htm

• Upgrade to Cisco ISE

  Hello

  I have cisco ISE 1.0, which I want to spend 1.3 ISE. According to the upgrade path, I would need to follow this process

  1.0 > 1.1 (apply the latest patch) 1.2 > 1.3

  The bundle 1.0 to 1.1 is deferred. So I think to install a new 1.3 ISE as a virtual appliance and then configure it from there. I have not too clued up on ISE so I was wondering is there a way to backup on ISE 1.0 and 1.3 restoration?

  If this is not the case, what would be the best approach?

  Thank you

  Wow 1.0 to 1.4 is a big leap in functionality. You run this in your production network?

  Authentication and authorization should continue to work that you have configured the.

  On the top of my head

  -you come on duty return to the AD domain (if you have joined in the first place). Make sure you have the credentials of the service account to do.

  -Comments and other portals have been completely redesigned. If you have made any customizations, you're probably better it demolition and reconstruction by using the new tools of the portal generator.

  -Depending on whether you have advanced Base 1.0 licenses will take you through basic or Apex with 1.3 / 1.4.

  -ISE has a ton of other features that may or may not apply in your environment.

• Need help the NM-CIDS upgrade on Cisco 3845 router.

  Can someone tell me all the files I need to improve my 5,0000 E3 to E4 6,0000 ID?  I think I should be able to do with the material that I currently have.  I do not have the resources to upgrade the router or the module NM-CIDS.  I want to update the E4 because it seems that Cisco is no longer put signatures for E3.  Documentation, I read that I should at least the Image of the system, the Service Pack, the recovery Image and update engine files.  I see several different times with a GOAL in the file names naming convention.  I'm not sure what I will need the names of specific files.

  A screenshot of version see is lower.

  See the version
  Application partition:

  Cisco Intrusion Prevention System, Version 5,0000 E3

  Host:
  Domain keys key1.0
  Definition of signature:
  Update of the signing S479.0 2010-03-19
  Virus update V1.4 2007-03-02
  OS version: 2.4.30 - IDS-smp-bigphys
  Platform: NM-CIDS
  Serial number: FOC11014468
  License expires: August 14, 2010 UTC
  Sensor time is 17 days.
  Using 509292544 bytes of available memory (79% of use) 403263488
  system uses 17.7 M off 29,0 M bytes of disk space available (61% of use)
  the application data uses 34.1 M off 174.7 M bytes of disk space available (21% of use)
  start using 39.1 M off 75.9 M bytes of disk space available (54% of use)
  Application log using 532,3 M off bytes of 2.8 G of disk space available (20% of use)

  MainApp N-2008_JUN_06_02_35 (release) 2008-06 - 06T 03: 23:18 - 0500 Running
  AnalysisEngine NO-2008_OCT_16_22_05 (release) 2008-10-16 T 22: 30:37 - 0500 Running
  CLI-N-2008_JUN_06_02_35 (release) 2008-06 - 06T 03: 23:18 - 0500

  Upgrade history:

  * IPS - GIS - S478 - req - E3 18:12:38 UTC Monday, March 22, 2010
  IPS-GIS-S479-req - E3.pkg 14:00:57 UTC Friday, March 26, 2010

  Version 1.1 - 5, 0000 E3 recovery partition

  You only need the IPS - K9 - 6.0 - 6 - E4.pkg file.

  Put it on an FTP server and jump on the sensor CLI and run this command:

  upgrade ftp: / / (user name) @(ipaddress of your ftp server)//(directory, if any)/IPS-K9-6.0-6-E4.pkg)

  -Bob

• Upgrade to Cisco ASA 5520 8.2.5 to 9.1.7

  Hello

  I have an upgrade tonight for a customer to upgrade a StandAlone ASA 5520 in version 8.2.5 in 9.1.7. I have the same upgrade week next to the same client for a failover pair.

  I already have this kind of process of 8.2.x upgrade to 9.1.x so I know the entire process, since I have to take a first step 8.2.5 8.4.6 then 9.1.7. In addition this customer has no statement of Nat therefore normally an easy process.

  But today during my routine to prepare for the upgrade (I prefer to make a double or triple check before) I found this bug:

  https://BST.cloudapps.Cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuh19234;JSESSIONID=0A69...

  This bug is fixed in version 8.4.7, and 8.4.6.99. But it is not recommended by the upgrade process for a 8.2.5 to 8.4.7 jump and I can not find the 8.4.6.99 version.

  I don't want to have any problems during my upgrade with something I can avoid.

  As I said I already have this updated in the past without any problem and with a more complex configuration.

  Has anyone as a return to this process for the last months? Should I do an extra step? (before first 8.2.5 to 8.4.5 8.4.6 or 8.4.7)

  Thank you in advance for your answer.

  There are a few incidents reported for ASA 5520 8.2.5 hit this defect running.

  You can go for an extra for 8.4.x upgrade as you mentioned to avoid default we can't say for sure if you will encounter this situation or not.  8.4.6.99 can be a picture of development so be unavailable unless you want to call TAC and confirm or obtain any other image in 8.4.x train.
  Maybe add another upgrade code can't hurt as that hit the bug.

  Kind regards
  Dinesh Moudgil

  PS Please rate helpful messages.

• The upgrade of Cisco 1600 access points

  A customer has Cisco 1600 12 access point and they want to add 3 access points. These access points are autonomous access points and the customer is tired to make individual changes by access points.  I suggested that the new access point be base controller, so my question; These existing access points can be upgraded to LWAPP? Or do need to be replaced? Or this controller one web-based access to existing contact points and be controlled.

  so my question; can these existing access point be upgraded to LWAPP? Or do they need to be replaced?

  Yes, existing AP can be converted into TOUR mode with a recovery image. Here's how you can do it (note that there are several ways) http://mrncciew.com/2012/10/20/lightweight-to-autonomous-conversion/ http://mrncciew.com/2013/12/13/ap-conversion-using-mode-button/ is the good idea to get a WLC (like 2504) to manage in a simple way, rather managing them individually. See below the product bundles available. If this is the case, you will get with license 25AP 2504 for almost for free when you buy 2 x 1702. Make sure that you choose the product of appropriate regulatory AIR-AP1702I-A-WLC HTH Rasika * Pls note all useful responses *.

• Cisco VCS - server certificate

  I get the warning "certificate unsecure: this cystem uses the default server certificate.". We recommend... "On my VCS' are

  1. is there something that I have to take into consideration related to endpoints or other VCS (this is a cluster) before you download a new certificate?

  2. communication between endpoints will affect?

  Hello

  If you are looking to get your certificates signed by yourself or a public certification authority I would first make sure that your servers have host names and configured DNS records. In addition, if you plan to use the edge of the collaboration (MRA) you should take a look at the additional without required for this:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/TD/docs/voice_ip_comm/Expressway/config...

  You shouldn't have issues with endpoints being affected, in my experience, the certificates have affected only edge of collaboration.

  Thank you, Simon