users authenticated in IBOTS group

Similar Questions

• the AAA authentication enable default group Ganymede + activate

  I implement CSACS 4.0. First of all on the client, I will apply aaa authenticatio / authorization under vty. The issure if I use the followin command

  the AAA authentication enable default group Ganymede + activate

  What happens if I connect via the console? I need to enter a name of user and password?

  Here is my configuration

  AAA new-model

  Group authvty of connection authentication AAA GANYMEDE + local

  the AAA authentication enable default group Ganymede + activate

  authvty orders 15 AAA authorization GANYMEDE + local

  RADIUS-server host IP

  Radius-server key

  Ganymede IP source interface VLAN 3

  AAA accounting send stop-record an authentication failure

  AAA accounting delay start

  AAA accounting exec authvty start-stop group Ganymede +.

  orders accounting AAA 15 authvty power group Ganymede +.

  AAA accounting connection authvty start-stop group Ganymede +.

  line vty 0 15

  connection of authentication authvty

  authorization orders 15 authvty

  authvty connection accounting

  accounting orders 15 authvty

  accunting exec authvty

  Any suggestion will be appreciated!

  It should work because it is a guest message.banner whenever you try to connect (console/vty). I set it up on my router.

  If you have banner motd, it will appear as well (see below). So, I have to remove it to get only the aaa banner & prompt is displayed:

  ************************************************************

  Username: cisco, password: cisco (priv 15f - local) *.

  ************************************************************

  Any unauthorized use is prohibited.

  Enter your name here: User1

  Now enter your password:

  Router #.

  The configuration more or less looks like this:

  AAA new-model

  AAA authentication banner ^ is forbidden to use CUnauthorized. ^ C

  AAA authentication password prompt "enter your password now:

  AAA-guest authentication username "enter your name here:

  Group AAA authentication login default RADIUS

  local authentication AAA CONSOLE connection

  HTH

  AK

• LDAP attribute on user card match no group

  We currently have Anyconnect (client based) up and running on our ASA 5515 X 9.5 (1) running. I use AD LDAP for authentication and configuration of LDAP attribute maps and assigned to our LDAP on the ASA server config. Like many, we use these cards to allow ASA assign a group policy to a user based on the AD group membership. Basically I have one AD Group for regular of VPN users and a group for users Admin VPN advertising. It works pretty well, but there are cases where the user profile specific related to group policy 'Regular users of VPN' does not work for all users of this ad group. I was trying to find a way to adjust the settings for certain users based on the user name. Say the user needs setting up VPN from an RDP session, but I'm not all users have that so I would attribute a group different local\Configuration user profile based on the AD username that would allow the VPN from a RDP session. Still, the rest of the users would be blocked to the RDP VPN. Here is my map to attribute LDAP database:

  map-attribute LDAP
  name of the memberOf Group Policy map
  map-value memberOf "LDAP path."
  msRADIUSFramedIPAddress IETF-RADIUS-Framed-IP-Address card name

  Now I could do here with the above configuration, I think it's to create a new group policy on the SAA for a certain group of users and then create a new value of the card with a new LDAP path that would point to a new group in AD, say "RDP VPN users". I then add the users I want Anyconnect group policies\user specific profiles for this particular ad group. But the question is that I would prefer not to have to create as many groups in AD.

  I want to know is if there is a way to have a path of card value of LDAP attribute to a certain username AD somehow. As if the LDAP path was something like "CN =, OU = users, DC =, DC ='.»» This way I could affect a group policy to the majority of users in the group "Regular users of VPN" AD, but then assign a different policy to some users who require slightly different settings. That would allow me to match on a certain user, not one ad group? The Group cisco-attribute-name strategy addresses a user as if it were an ad group? I guess not, but not sure. I looked through the list of names of attributes-cisco - but didn't see anything that looked like it worked for AD user names.

  Also, if anyone knows a better way please let me know I am open to suggestions. I hope that makes sense. Thanks in advance to the community for help.

  I think that you need a completely different approach - DAP (dynamic access policies).

  DAP allows a lot of motion of things, and you can create additive strategies.  So if you are a member of the group 'A' you add to this URL.  If you are also a member of the group 'B' you add this ACL.  If it can also do other things, like checking the registry keys, etc.

  The Guide deployment of DAP.

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/7691/ASA-8X-dynamic-access-policies-DAP-deployment-guide

  I pretty much don't use DAP now (and no attribute is mapped) due to the significant increase in flexibility.

• ISE ERS user access to some groups?

  Hello

  I am trying to create a simple operational interface for ISE 1.4 for the helpdesk people add mac addresses from endpoint to endpoint internal DB via REST.

  I would like to have the filtered helpdesk access (so that they can only create endpoints in a group given, not all groups), but it seems that the RBAC in ISE control for users of the RHS is all or nothing.

  I created a Custom Data Access Menu permissions then defined that a user in a group ERS Helpdesk would have access to it. On RBAC policy, I can not only specify a data access authorization, the system always makes me choose a permission to access the Menu as first option.

  If so I said that to the endpoint Group X, to access the data for a group of ERS Custom Data Access, the ERS user gets access denied to the DB.

  Only when I put the user on the RHS Admin by default, the default Super Admin Data Access group, it is able to have access to the DB.

  I would like to ask if anyone of you has managed to control the data set that is at HIA outside access or read access and if so, how.

  Thank you

  Gustavo Novais

  PS: ERS debug logs:

  2015-09-19 09:38:47, 172 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-#--> getPathInfo = PAPFilter.doFilter / endpointgroup
  2015-09-19 09:38:47, 172 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> getMethod = GET
  2015-09-19 09:38:47, 172 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> getRequestURL =https://10.1.156.136:9060 / ers/config/endpointgroup
  2015-09-19 09:38:47, 172 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> getRemoteHost = 10.2.10.63
  2015-09-19 09:38:47, 174 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> passing the filter!
  2015-09-19 09:38:47, 174 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-#--> getPathInfo = AtnAtzFilter.doFilter / endpointgroup
  2015-09-19 09:38:47, 174 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter.doFilter--> getMethod = GET
  2015-09-19 09:38:47, 174 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter.doFilter--> getRequestURL =https://10.1.156.136:9060 / ers/config/endpointgroup
  2015-09-19 09:38:47, 174 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter.doFilter--> getRemoteHost = 10.2.10.63
  2015-09-19 09:38:47, 174 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter: adminName = RHS
  2015-09-19 09:38:47, 174 INFO [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-AtnAtzFilter 401Blocked: user is not authorized to access the requested resource.
  2015-09-19 09:38:47, 175 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.MaxThreadsLimiterFilter] -:-# RateLimitFilter Servlet => continue with the response of the RHS, the current number of bucket: 49
  2015-09-19 09:39:15, 992 INFO [admin-http-pool279] [api.services.server.role.RoleImpl] -: admin:455184AE2B954C78C9EAD7AAECD913F8:-extract the list of roles for entityFQN Information: NAC group: NAC
  2015-09-19 09:39:20, 328 INFO [admin-http-pool295] [api.services.persistance.dao.UserDAO] -: admin:455184AE2B954C78C9EAD7AAECD913F8:-update of user as user name information: NAC Group: NAC:ers
  2015-09-19 09:39:20, 330 INFO [admin-http-pool295] [api.services.persistance.dao.MappingDAO] -: admin:455184AE2B954C78C9EAD7AAECD913F8:-creating new mapping with rolebundle ' Global: Default "context" Global Context context: Global ' user ' NAC Group: NAC:ers' role ' NAC Group: NAC:RBACGroups:ERS Admin»
  2015-09-19 09:39:20, 333 INFO [admin-http-pool295] [api.services.server.mapping.MappingImpl] -: admin:455184AE2B954C78C9EAD7AAECD913F8:-removing users from role with the name ' NAC Group: NAC:RBACGroups:ERS filters under contextFQN "Global Context context: Global", bundle Global role: by default "with transactional 'false' is
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 682 INFO [ers-http-pool732] [cisco.cpm.nsf.impl.UserIdentityManagement] -:-the internal authentication method to check if the policies in correspondence of the user groups duration is 7
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.MaxThreadsLimiterFilter] -:-#--> getPathInfo = MaxThreadsFilter.doFilter / endpointgroup
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.MaxThreadsLimiterFilter] -:-# MaxThreadsFilter.doFilter--> getMethod = GET
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.MaxThreadsLimiterFilter] -:-# MaxThreadsFilter.doFilter--> getRequestURL =https://10.1.156.136:9060 / ers/config/endpointgroup
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.MaxThreadsLimiterFilter] -:-# MaxThreadsFilter.doFilter--> getRemoteHost = 10.2.10.63
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.MaxThreadsLimiterFilter] -:-# RateLimitFilter Servlet => continue with the request of the RHS, the current number of bucket: 49
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-#--> getPathInfo = PAPFilter.doFilter / endpointgroup
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> getMethod = GET
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> getRequestURL =https://10.1.156.136:9060 / ers/config/endpointgroup
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 691 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> getRemoteHost = 10.2.10.63
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 693 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.PAPFilter] -:-# PAPFilter.doFilter--> passing the filter!
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 693 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-#--> getPathInfo = AtnAtzFilter.doFilter / endpointgroup
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 693 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter.doFilter--> getMethod = GET
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 693 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter.doFilter--> getRequestURL =https://10.1.156.136:9060 / ers/config/endpointgroup
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 693 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter.doFilter--> getRemoteHost = 10.2.10.63
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 693 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter: adminName = RHS
  2015-09-19 09:39:34, 693 DEBUG [ers-http-pool732] [cpm.ers.app.web.AtnAtzFilter] -:-# AtnAtzFilter: = RHS adminName is Admin ERS

  He does not seem to have many options when it comes to control access to resource api ers, I ended up doing my own local map in my web application to ad vs access groups groups endpoint.

• Cisco ACS 4.2 a user in several local groups

  Currently, I like this group map

  ACS groups window

  GRP of GRP-A-B-1 and PDM - 2
  GRP - A. GRP - 1

  GRP - Grp-2 B

  For example currently a user test1 is part of two groups 1 and 2 under windows and is mapped to the Grp-A-B of the CSA. Is it possible if I delete the mapping of Grp-A-B in ACS and can see the user test1 speratley in both groups (Grp - A and Grp - B) to GBA?

  Salam Muhammad,

  If you have a local user in ACS, this user cannot be a member of both groups at the same time.

  The same concept applies to external users. They cannot be mapped to two different groups at the same time.

  If you delete the configuration of Grp-A-B, the test1 user will be mapped to the first group in the list because ACS 4.2 process mapping group in the order:

  ' the snip "'

  Order of group mapping

  ACS always maps users to a single group of TISA. However, a user can belong to several groups the group mapping. For example, a user named John could be a member of the ensemble of the engineering group and California, and at the same time be a member of the combination of Group Engineering and management. If the value of group ACS mappings exist for these two combinations, ACS must determine what group John should be affected.

  ACS prevents contradictory group set mappings by assigning an order of mapping for the whole group maps. When a user who is authenticated by an external user database is assigned to a group of ACS, ACS begins at the top of the list of groups for this database mappings. ACS sequentially checks group memberships of user in the database of the external user against each group mapping in the list. Where to find the first set group mapping corresponding memberships to external users in the user database, ACS assigns the user to the group this group map ACS and ends the process of mapping.

  ' the snip "'

  Reference:http://goo.gl/cvc474

  HTH

  Amjad

  Rating of useful answers is more useful to say "thank you".

• VPN3002 PAT-Mode and individual user authentication

  Hi all

  I have three questions about the VPN3002 connected to a VPN3005 in the PAT mode

  and with authentication of the individual user.

  First of all:

  Is it possible to use this function for several users to the

  private LAN.

  Because I tried this, but when we the second user has been authenticated one could not work more.

  Second:

  When we first meet is YES, can be the users in a group of dispute as the

  VPN3002 Client it self?

  Third:

  That is, when there is a router between the local private network and users?

  Because the field of authentication of user appears only when users

  are directly connected to the private lan.

  I tried with PAT, but this was not possible because the VPN3002 can

  different users.

  I think that it will be possible with NAT, but then I ran to my first question.

  concerning

  Karlheinz

  1 > it is the main function of the user authentication feature see here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/univercd/CC/TD/doc/product/VPN/vpn3002/3_5/get_star/gs1under.htm#xtocid13

  2 > users cannot be in the other group. Group is dependent of the what the 3002 cumulates in.

  3 > it wouldn't send other subnets connected to the private sector. The design of the 3002 is such that only the subnet behind it, is what it can do vpn for.

  Kind regards

• ACS 4.2 RSA Authentication and LDAP group mapping

  Hello

  I have a firewall, PaloAlto, with overall protection enabled (SSL - VPN) feature

  I use Cisco Secure ACS as a proxy for the RSA SecurID authentication.

  After authentication is try to map ad through LDAP query groups.

  The question I've found, is that the user I get with user authentication has no field:

  Show user ip-user-mapping all | mbm60380 game

  10.240.1.24 vsys1 UIA 2388 2388 domain\mbm60380

  10.240.1.1 vsys1 UIA 2101 2101 domain\mbm60380

  10.240.250.1 mbm60380 2590859 2590859 vsys2 GP

  But the list of users that I receive from the LDAP query includes the domain prefix:

  See the user group name domain\group1 property

  short name: domain\group1

  [1] domain\aag60368

  [2] domain\ced61081

  [3] domain\jas61669

  [4] domain\mbm60380

  [5] domain\pmc61693

  [6] domain\vcm60984

  I would like to create the user with the area of GBA but it must delete the domain before querying the RSA server, as it does not support field stripping.

  I tried to fix this on the Palo Alto firewall without success.

  I'm trying to run Cisco Secure ACS 4.2 changing, but it did not work either:

  RSA servers are configured as an external database.  They are not defined in the groups of network devices.

  Can I set up domain stripping for queries servers RSA?

  Thank you

  Hello

  I think it should work, but it is a bit awkward:

  Create an entry in the Distribution of Proxy in the Network Configuration.

  DOMAIN\\USER *.

  Prefix

  Before returning to the AAA server, from there to authenticate to the server RSA without the domain prefix.

  Make sense?

  Thank you

  Chris

• User authentication with AD Director

  Hey!

  Am having a problem with the management groups.

  I try to make external authentication with users of the AD but fails with one: user authentication failed: Eric: no group admin

  Everything seems fine, political authorization, Menu access, liaison group AD with ISE Super Admin to access the data group

  My user is ok on AD (not locked, expired, or anything)

  Anyone had this problem before?

  THX

  Possibility of vice.

  CSCud31796    ISE - External RBAC fails if Member user from the group containing the apostrophe

  Symptom:

  RBAC using a storage of external identity (AD, LDAP) group mapping fails for a correct user with the groups to access the GUI of the ISE. The following message will appear:

  "User authentication failed: username: admin group.

  Conditions:

  The user is a member of a group that contains the apostrophe character.

  Workaround solution:

  There is no work around in ISE.

  1 rename all groups in the external identity store such that they do not contain apostrophes

  2 remove users participating in the administration of all external groups containing apostrophes ISE

  Jatin kone
  -Does the rate of useful messages-

• Apex 5, user "Is in the group" works for authorization seems to not work

  Hello team Apex,

  Apex 5

  I would use the construction Type of plan (user) "Is in the group" authorization feature, but it seems to not work.

  The user is in the group but nevertheless is not allowed.

  I checked this with "& APP_ALIAS. ' in the group element - that's how I would use it - and the Group static 'true' name too.

  (We have a group for all applications, where the group name is the same name of the App - just to understand the call below.)

  When I use it to place a further authorization scheme with "PL/SQL function body:

  Return apex_util.current_user_in_group (v ('APP_ALIAS'));

  -It works as expected.

  Can you please verify this?

  Thank you in advance!

  Concerning

  André

  Hi Andre,

  What type of authentication scheme you use? Because, according to the text of the authorization scheme aid groups will be just picked up for the authentication of the account of the APEX.

  • Group: enter a group name. Authorization succeeds if the group is activated as a dynamic group for the session (see APEX_AUTHORIZATION. ENABLE_DYNAMIC_GROUPS). If the application uses authentication to accounts Express request, this check also includes workspace groups that are granted to the user. If database authentication is used, this check also includes database roles that are granted to the user.

  I just tried "Is in the group" and had no problem to check my groups.

  BTW, in your PL/SQL code, there is no need to use the function of V, just use bind variables as syntax: APP_ALIAS

  Concerning

  Patrick

• Verification of the users belonging to the Group spasfic weblogic server

  I built a simple service application web with jdeveloper 11.1.1.7 strategy (Wssp1.2 - 2007-Https-UsernameToken - Plain.xml) and deploy the weblogic 10.3. Everything works very well in both the client side and server.

  The client side is unable to call any method without specifying the username and password properties. The server automatically checks the user in users values define in weblogic server in the following path (summary of the areas of security > myrealm > users and groups). Hereby, the customer can access the system if he takes one of the users in this group even with the default user weblogic/weblogic.

  Question: How to limit the name to username/password check with specific usergroup?. That is, if the client mentions the name of user and password outside of the Group (even if the values are correct) the server rejects the request

  Problem, solved by (user name: Roque)

  in this link: java - verification of users within the spasfic group of weblogic server for the web service application - Stack Overflow

  Here is his answer for your reference:

  If you use the 'default' weblogic for users authentication method, you can follow these steps to set up an access group policy:

  • Connect to the weblogic administration console
  • Click on the links of deployments
  • Select your webservice
  • Click the Security tab
  • Click the sub-tab political
  • Choose your authorization provider in the menu drop-down (looks like by default)
  • Choose Add Conditions-> Group-> Type in the name of the Group
  • Finishing

  Now that the group you added should be able to invoke the web service. All other users should see something like:

  javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPFaultException: Access denied to operation myWebService

• ACS 3.2 - users 'ghosts' of a group

  It is a bit of a strange. We run ACS 3.2 (1) on a Windows 2000-based computer. We have about 30 groups for different users. The only group (Group 1) always tells us that we have 30 users that are actually part of the group. The group says 90 users but when you list users there is only 60. I moved all users to a new group and now it says there are 30 users in the group, but when you a list of people, it gives you nothing. I have backed up the database, did a new install of 3.2 (2) on another machine and perform a restore to this area and I always get the same result. I'm trying to find out if the Group has not correctly or if there are 30 users 'ghosts' somewhere! I recently inherited the ACS boxes so I don't know when this problem started.

  There seems to be all known bugs related to this. Has anyone else seen this before?

  Thank you!

  We have definitely corrected the issue and the matter is now closed. What we did that I sent him a copy of backup of ACS server so he could watch. He then sent back me a backup file saying they found the problem and restore the backup file to the ACS. The TAC Guy sent email me looked like this:

  "We cannot create a Dump.txt we can do on ACS installed on Windows Server by the csutil-d option basically on the device.

  This dump.txt is a readable format of the database unlike the .dmp

  I downloaded the .dmp sent by you on the ACS (Windows Server) service at my end created a dump.txt, corrected by running the perl script and downloaded and then turn it back on to the ACS server by the-l option of csutil. They I took a backup of the ACS and sent it. I have check the .dmp even on the device at my end to confirm the correction.

  It basically an indexing problem, caused when the admin deletes users and link pointer not are deleted in the registry of the origin of the problem.

  As discussed, regular backup, and performance of the dbcompact should help prevent this problem.

  I have attached the perl script, you can use it if necessary in the future.

  Hope this helps, feel free to contact me if you have further questions. At this point I go ahead and close the request service, as discussed. »

  If you want I can send you the email of the script that the guy sent me. But obviously as it said and what I thought, it's a matter of pointer in the database.

• ASA VPN - allow user based on LDAP Group

  Hello friends

  I have create a configuration to allow connection based on LDAP Group.

  I m not specialize in the firewall and I tried to follow the links above, but both seem old, commanded several is not available.

  http://www.tunnelsup.com/Cisco-ASA-VPN-authorize-user-based-on-LDAP-group

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-NEX...

  Anyone know how I can do?

  Thank you

  Marcio

  I like to use the Protocol DAP (dynamic access policies) to control this.  Follow this guide:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/7691/ASA-8X-dynamic-access-policies-DAP-deployment-guide

• BlackBerry smartphones "the application cannot be processed until multiple pending user authentications are resolved (error Id: 40831).

  I tried to login to my account to update to Windows Live Messenger and got this error message. What should I do to correct this? I have not attempted to identify some time, so I'm afraid it says "multiple pending user authentications.

  According to me, whereas it has proved to be a problem of Blackberry App World (or BB in general). A battery lawn mower folding to solve the problem... Thanks for your suggestion though

• TimesTen - 7001: user authentication failed when using XLA

  I installed TimesTen 11.2.1.8.0 on AIX 5.3 System.* user 'oracle '. I created another user of the application 'risk' to use in my application with TimesTen.

  When running my application with the user 'risk' to connect with TimesTen it is OK. But when I want to use the XLA feature, when I call the createDurableSubscriber function, it returns the error

  javax.jms.JMSException: failure of SQLDriverConnect (XlaCommon.c, line 48): S1000 7001 [TimesTen] [driver ODBC of TimesTen 11.2.1.8.0] TT7001 [TimesTen]: user authentication failed - file "db.c", lineno 9722, procedure 'sbDbConnect '.

  It is strange that if I switch to user 'oracle', it works fine.

  Can someone please help understand the reason why.

  Thank you

  You created the user 'at risk' within your TimesTen database?

  CREATE a USER risk IDENTIFIED BY 'some password'?

  You granted the privilege of the user risk to use XLA?

  XLA GRANT at risk;

  Have you used this user name and password in the JDBC URL when connecting to the database application JMS/XLA?

  The 'oracle' user is probably your admin user of the instance (which is the database root) and therefore can use all the features without special action (but of course you never run application as that user).

  Chris

• Home page by default for OBIEE 11 g based on the users and the wise group

  Hi all

  I'm using OBIEE 11 g.

  I need set the page default dashboard for the user and the wise group.

  EX:

  User1 is belongs to Group1 and Role1 - they need to see the default homepage as Dashboard1.

  User2 is belongs to the Group 2 and Role2 - they need to see the default homepage as Dashboard2.

  Kindly guide me to achieve.

  Please answer as soon as POSSIBLE.

  Thanks in advance.

  RR

  It is generally considered poor form to scream as soon as POSSIBLE to a question. http://www.CatB.org/ESR/FAQs/smart-questions.html

  As far as your question goes, it is that the CHEMINPORTAIL variable is for:

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E23943_01/bi.1111/e10540/variables.htm#i1013436

  OBIEE - system (reserved variables) session variables | GerardNico.com (BI, OBIEE, data warehouse and OWB)