vCPU Compatability
Hi all
I worked with vSphere now for about 8-9 years and have encountered a problem with a client that I'm not sure how to solve.
There are several groups on their site, but specifically there are 2 groups that have problems of multiple vCPU allocated to the VM system
The problem only arises with multiple vCPU and the DELL R720, other hosts are R710 that work very well.
There is a significant reduction of the CPU performance and overall VM pereformance when a virtual machine with more than 1 vCPU is moved from a R710 for the R720, I ran a diagnostic tool of CPU on the VM when moved and the answer is about half of the R710.
Here is some information of addtitional on installation:
- VMware vCenter Server Version 5.1.0 build 1123961
- VMware ESXi 5.1.0 1065491
- host1 DELL PowerEdge R710 Intel (r) CPU Xeon X 5670 @2. 93 GHz
host2 DELL PowerEdge R710 Intel (r) CPU Xeon X 5670 @2. 93 GHz
- host3 DELL powerEdge R720 Intel Xeon CPU E5-2667 0 @2. 90 GHz
Any thoughts?
See you soon
Slardy
On the off chance that someone else gets this question, if you dsable power management in the BIOS, it will solved the problem
Tags: VMware
Similar Questions
-
Windows 2003 &; 2008 vCPU compatibility
Hi guys,.I use the vSphere Enterprise licenseI received some comments std VMs Windows 2003 and windows 2008 std, I turn vCPUs to 8 for these guest virtual machinesI wonder is Windows 2003 & 2008 supports 8 vCPUs or no, I've read somewhere Windows 2003 supports maximum of 4 processors of material, but I couldn't find the vCPU compatibility matrixyour help will be much appreciatedThank youKind regardsChanFor this and for licensing reasons, VMware has introduced virtual vCPUs multi-core with vSphere 4.1. You can assign the number of vCPUs you need, and then set the way they are presented to the guest OS.
With vSphere 4.1, you must configure it as explained http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1010184, vSphere 5 provides this setting in the GUI.
To find out how many "physical" processors are supported by see for example http://support.microsoft.com/kb/888732/en-us or http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143760.aspx Windows
André
-
Difference between vCPU &; Core
Hello
I have a query in which I would like to know the conversion of physical to virtual server in the case of CPU
-Difference between 2 vCPU and 1 vCPU & 1 kernel, 2 carrots, in terms of performance etc...
-Also in the case of physical server with 2 physical processors and 8 virtual processors [4 virtual by UC] physical what will be the value creating virtual machines
Please suggest
Thank you
Fox
-Difference between 2 vCPU & 1 core & 1 vCPU 2 carrots, in terms of performance etc...
Basically, it's a guest operating system compatibility and/or licensing examination that you are configuring. In both cases the virtual machine will be scheduled on two physical cores.
-Also in the case of physical server with 2 processors and physical 8 virtual physical CPU [4 virtual by UC] what will be the value creating
As much as necessary, but start down. Often physical hardware is oversized (it's actually one of the reasons for virtualization). If you discover that the VM does not expected and it is caused by the CPU, then you can always add additional vCPUs/core later. With the addition of too many vCPUs you likely to affect the physical set system and all the VMS on it.
André
-
Before I dive and upgrade to Sierra, I'm looking for a reliable source check the compatibility of the applications, I currently rely on. Many are a bit dated. Any suggestions?
Main applications:
Microsoft Office for Mac 2011 v 14.6.8
Quicken for Mac 2007 v 16.2.4
Photoshop CS5 x 64 new v12.0
Roxio Toast 10 Titanium v 10.0
Apple Pages, Numbers and Keynote ' 09
Running OS X Lion mountain.
Click here.
(145086)
-
I have to stay with OS10.7.5 due to software compatibility, but is it possible to update Safari to latest version during your stay on OS10.7.5. How this is done. Thank you very much.
It is not possible to update Safari past 6.1.6 on Lion.
(144969)
-
How to: Crush 3/iMac 5 k (compatibility mode)
Hello friends,
I see quite a few new features on the market with Thunderbolt 3. According to the FAQ of TB3 Intel, TB1 and TB2 was designed with future upgrades in mind. This means that you can connect, once a solution is available, on a host of TB2 TB3 system using compatibility mode. It will only work to 20Gbps TB2, but work remains. The same is true of peripheral TB2 TB3 host computer (will work but at slower speed)
This would be similar to the connection of a USB 3 device on a USB 2 or 1 USB host but only get speeds over slow or vice versa.
The question I have is that if someone came out with these fittings/adapters? What I've seen online seems to go using a device of TB2 and TB3 host and each of these adapters is Windows only. I have spent too many hours searching so I'm curious to know if someone has yet to fall on an adapter or converter that connect DisplayPort TB2 host and have the device USB-C/TB3 (USB - C not only) in compatibility mode.
The reason? Peripheral TB3 are already less expensive than TB2 devices. I don't know who will get the most expensive. I don't care 40Gbps if he gives me a simple way to add multiple devices USB 3.0, exhibitions and maybe the eSata device. I know there are hubs, but I would prefer something that is the test of the future TB3 would be cheaper and future proof for NeXTGen computers.
(Sorry for the TL; DR but it is always a person who does not read or "assume" it is a noob question and gives an answer "Captain Obvious". Don't BE this guy here...)
Sincere greetings,
Jorge Uptown
JLopez. Chicago wrote:
The question I have is that if someone came out with these fittings/adapters?
-
DIGITAL CAMERA RAW COMPATIBILITY UPDATE 6.21
***? How many times I have to do? I'm FED UP! I don't care ABOUT RAW! Update your program... I have
NEVER USE! NOT my computer!
You're not talking Apple here. It is a moderated forum for Apple to discuss features and troubleshooting. Apple-> system-> software update Preferences menu contains options to disable automatic downloads, although the Mac App Store update itself for Snow Leopard activates the automatic notifications of updates. While a nuisance, you have just to tell more later, only choose to update once you have read the documentation to verify that its good operation with what you have. Always back up your data before allowing updates.
For direct feedback to Apple, who may have only one impact of future operating systems, http://www.apple.com/feedback
If you find that a specific update has compatibility issues, we invite you to sign up for a free developer online account on http://developer.apple.com and submit a bug report to http://bugreporter.apple.com where you can know at least that if it's something reported before. But this will not use or disclose this information here because of a confidentiality agreement.
-
ANT or heart Bluetooth Monitor strap compatibility?
That is, compatibility with A separate more specific ANT/Bluetooth Heart Monitor strap?
Hello
If preferred to use the integrated heart rate monitor, Apple Watch can measure your heart rate via an external pair Bluetooth chest strap cardiofrequence-meter.
More information:
Your heart rate. What it means, and where on Apple Watch you will find. -Apple Support
Use the Bluetooth with your Apple Watch - Apple Support Accessories
-
Corrupt Digital Raw compatibility update
I have my macbook set to do automatic updates. I see a light red on the App Store, which shows an updated - and when I check it said provision, "Digital Raw Compatibility Update, version 6.20. I scroll down and see that it has installed this update even at least 10 times start on 13 August through 24 August! Even updated, same version and I think it's a corrupted file or virus! Help, I want to stop saying that I need to update!
Hello cdaniels31.
Thank you for using communities Support from Apple. I understand that the Digital Raw compatibility update, version 6.20 performed several times, but the App Store there is always a full update. I am pleased to provide you with advice for this problem.
First of all, let me put your mind at ease. It is an updated official Apple for the compatibility of the RAW for OS X El Capitan image, not a virus. It seems that OS X is not recognizing that it was already done.
Let's start troubleshooting by restarting your MacBook. Then we will try to complete the update by using the link below, instead of using the App Store.
Digital Raw Compatibility Update, version 6.20
Finally, restart your MacBook, once more.
Kind regards.
-
I take Logic Pro 9, but after looking at all the improvements for Logic Pro X, I can't wait to get up to speed.
I like the look of the improvements to the plug-in; logic adding distance (not available for LP9?); Drum Kit Designer, synthesizer, etc.
When he (LP10) announced that there is a flagrant limitation I had with my current set-up but I don't remember what the hiccup was... perhaps there is none and I could be good-to-go. Can anyone confirm if and where I'm looking at compatibility problems?
System: Mac Pro Tower (mid-2010) 2.8 GHz Quad Core Intel Xenon
OS: 10.10.5 (Yosemite)
Interface: Climax together - Firewire
If I remember, the question I met was first introduced with the announcement of Logic Pro X was he needed El Capitan - which did not offer the divers "Core Audio" / support, which means that overall height (Firewire) would be uncertain if even not work at all. "" Looking at the "tech specs" on Logic Pro X, it supports OS X 10.10. That looks promising (if it in fact the issue with El Capitan and the lack of support for Core Audio driver still exists).
Can I run Logic Pro X to Yosemite?
Can I run overall height (FireWire) in El Capitan without the Core Audio Driver issues / Firewire?
Thanks in advance!
I must add, additional hardware, I am running is a UAD PCI card in the tower.
-
Hi I'm still stuck with Firefox and their nasa night launch addon - belt LavaFox & BlackFox Orions w / Grim Reaper (one who is all black, no shit bar gray and the drop-down boxes are black with white writing), it's the best setup I like for my computer and I've just updated to the new firefox and it is incompatible? I tried to download the other launch night nasa and that ' s when I got pissy gray bar and white drop-down boxes (shit) so I had to remove firefox and download a previous version of 2014 to correct the problem and disable all future updates.
How you do this? you boast of personalization and are never compatible previous addons, that I don't want any other addons that this ive got! I think it's the best it is its completely black all the boxes included and somehow you will find it is too hard to make sure that all the addons have a single line of code that is also added to your updates, so they all work together and now I can't update and continue my experience with firefox now I am looking for the alternative browser options that give me what I like and allow me to keep it because it is always, unless I'm finding that you took my situation seriously and we will integrate the compatibility section of addon for all the new updates.Yours Sincerely
Disgruntled usersYou were able to use this theme through 41 of Firefox, but it stopped working in Firefox 42?
I think others have mentioned problems with the complete themes in Firefox 42, but I don't remember the details. I hope an update will come.
In the meantime, rather than running a version with known security vulnerabilities, you might consider another variant of Firefox called the Extended Support Release (ESR). It is currently based on Firefox 38 with a few security updates. It is unlikely to have any change relating to the compatibility of the Add on, until next year.
If you decide to try it, here's how I suggest to install:
Clean reinstall it
We use this name, but it isn't about deleting your settings, this is to ensure that the program, files are clean (not incompatible, corrupt or exotic code files). As described below, this process does not disrupt your existing settings. Don't uninstall NOT Firefox, that does not need.
(A) download a fresh Installer for Firefox 38.4.0esr of https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/organizations/all/ in an ideal location. (Scroll down your preferred language).
(B) the release of Firefox (if any).
(C) to rename the program folder, either:
(Windows 64-bit folder names)
C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox
TO
C:\Program Files (x86)\FxOld
(Windows 32-bit folder names)
C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox
TO
C:\Program Files\FxOld
(D) run the installer downloaded to (A). It should automatically connect to your existing settings.
Success?
Note: Some plugins can only exist in this FxOld file. If it is missing something essential, present in these files:
- \FxOld\Plugins
- \FxOld\browser\plugins
-
Firefox constantly asks me to upgrade to the latest version, which is not a problem as long as the new generation is compatible with applications that I serve throughout and rely on every day. I use the 40.0.3 version and it wants me to update to 41.0.2. If the Norton Identity Safe toolbar work with my current version of Firefox, what is the compatibility issue with a newer version of Firefox? IE does not appear to have this problem of update... which makes me consider the switch back to IE as my default browser. I rely on the Identity Safe to take care of my connection problems, and there is no need to deal with problems of incompatibility. I know I'm not alone in finding this aggravation with updates. (I use Win7 Home Premium, 64-bit).
Sorry, this is a change in the types of code Add - ons are allowed to include. It was supposed to change in Firefox 40, but at the request of vendors such as Symantec, it was postponed to 41 of Firefox. I don't think this change will flip over. Norton is working on a new version, but I understand that it takes longer than expected.
Here's what I suggest for users who need Norton password security features:
Instead of freezing your Firefox on a non secure version, consider using the Extended Support Release (ESR). It is designed for businesses that require a cycle time longer between changes to the features, but anyone can use it. ESR is currently based on Firefox 38. It will get updates of security over the coming months, but not to get new features, so changes in Firefox 41 concerning the compatibility of the add-on will not be out for a good time.
Norton is likely to continue to support the ESR until the new toolbar update is finished, maybe next month. After that, I don't know what they will do because normally they don't take over a small range of versions.
If you decide to try it, here's how I suggest to install:
Clean reinstall it
We use this name, but it isn't about deleting your settings, this is to ensure that the program, files are clean (not incompatible, corrupt or exotic code files). As described below, this process does not disrupt your existing settings. Don't uninstall NOT Firefox, that does not need.
(A) download a fresh Installer for Firefox 38.3.0esr of https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/organizations/all/ in an ideal location. (Scroll down your preferred language).
(B) the release of Firefox (if any).
(C) simply rename the program folder, either:
(Windows 64-bit folder names)
C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox
TO
C:\Program Files (x86)\Fx41
(Windows 32-bit folder names)
C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox
TO
C:\Program Files\Fx41
(D) run the installer downloaded to (A). It should automatically connect to your existing settings.
Success?
Note: Some plugins can only exist in the old folder. If it is missing something essential, present in these files:
- \Fx41\Plugins
- \Fx41\browser\plugins
-
The addon compatibility?
Just a thought.
I had a complete theme I really liked called Silvermel.
So, with the latest updates, it is more compatible with Firefox. I went to complete themes in Firefox Addons to see if I could find something else I liked and found that 95% of them are not compatible. It is not as bad with my other addons as with complete themes, but I'm still losing the use of 1 or 2 update of Firefox addons.Firefox is always talking about how customizable they are and then their advances make less. Improve things to the point where you're tell them improved it is counterproductive.
Would ask you the developers of Firefox not change the things that the addons must be usable? If they don't then they should not be updated.
Thank you!Thanks for the comments!
Firefox is built by users for users. Feedback is very important to the development process.
The best place to leave comments for Firefox is here:
https://input.Mozilla.org/en-us/feedback/FirefoxYou can also access this page at any time to in Firefox by clicking the Menu icon (the one with three lines, looks a bit like a hamburger), then click the question mark at the bottom of the drop down, then click on 'submit your comments... '. »
With regard to the compatibility of the add-on broken; updates do not usually break a lot of modules. But right now Firefox is going through major changes in how modules work. We worked closely with add-on developers to ensure that their modules are updated to be compatible with these changes.
Unfortunately, some developers are trolling or have abandoned their modules in total. You can read more about these changes in the blog of Mozilla post titled The Future of development of Firefox Add-ons
-
Verification of the compatibility conducted and ultra firefox slow
When I started Firefox yesterday (19/05/2015), he said that she was performing a verification of the compatibility of Firefox Add-ons and has been really slow. Entry of a same character is lagging far behind what anyone typing in Firefox. I tried Firefox rearmament and deletion of the recent modules. Firefox seems to work OK in Mode without failure.
Hi Pubdef, try Disabling graphics hardware acceleration. You will have to perhaps restart Firefox for it to take effect, so save any work first (e.g. you compose mail, documents online that you are editing, etc.).
Then perform the following steps:
- Open the Firefox Options tab as follows, click on the menu button
then select Options .
- In the Options of Firefox tab, click Advanced, and then select general.
- You will find in the list of parameters, the checkbox use hardware acceleration when available . Uncheck this box.
- Now restart Firefox and see if the problems persist.
In addition, please check the updates for your graphics driver by following the steps in the following knowledge base articles:
This solve your problems? Please report to us!
Thank you.
- Open the Firefox Options tab as follows, click on the menu button
-
I received a 'how to' care how do to be able to view this Web site, but it wants me to download Internet Explorer (excuse me if I say yuck!)...
If the directions state: under 'Tools', click 'compatibility view settings. Where is said to write 'add this Web site' in the Web site, then click on add and close. Close and restart.
I live on Mozilla on all my devices. I recommend it to anyone who has not yet been introduced. I cringe to think to be forced to use internet explore!
Thanks for all you do!
So I downloaded the addon. Now to set "a different useragent" I go on the site. Click UAControl options for this site? Click Custom, and then enter ' Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; ". INTERNET EXPLORER 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)"?
Maybe you are looking for
-
The spell checker in FF11 does not erase the previous words and fills the context menu
Suggestions of preceding words are in the context menu and fill it instead to introduce myself with only one suggestion at a time. It comes from FF11
-
Windows 7 product key, but no disc
had to refomat laptop computer after a virus, have lost everything. Reinstalled windows xp recovery disc. There is a 7 product key of windows on the underside of the laptop. Is it possible to reinstall without buying another copy of Windows 7?
-
How to remove the old Hello msi file
make the misstake of trying to download the new itunes to message delete old Hello computer msi keep can someone help? PS also tried using itunes help they say that I'm not on the internet
-
Question on HP 2311xi - auto wakeup source and delay of sleep
I recently bought this monitor and noticed that when he wakes up from his sleep, it will take about 5 to 10 seconds for him to wake up so that other monitors I've owned that they went immediately. I was just wondering if this is how this monitor is
-
Looking for my SP on my system
Could someone please tell me how to find the service pack on my system and how to upgrade? Please... Thank you!