View all virtual disk

Similar Questions

• Get address Local SCSI virtual disk (Bus: Target)

  Hi all

  I'm having a little trouble getting this info from a couple of virtual machines. I need the bus address: local target for all virtual disks VMDK or RDM. I have seen a few examples to compare the widonws configuration to the configuration of the virtual machine but I am not interested right now, I just need the configuration of the virtual machine. I would appreciate your help. Thank you...

  Try something like this

  Get - VM | Get-hard drive |

  Select @{N = "Name VM"; E={$_. Parent.Name}},

  @{N = 'HD name'; E={$_. Name}},

  @{N = "SCSIid"; E = {$strControllerKey = $_.} ExtensionData.ControllerKey.ToString (); "{0}" ': {1} "$strControllerKey [$strControllerKey.Length f - 1], $_." ExtensionData.Unitnumber}}

• The list of all virtual machines with more than 2 virtual disks

  Hello.

  I want to list all virtual machines in a data center vCenter, who got more than 2 virtual disks. Here's the workflow, I am working on that:

  1 get the view of data center

  2. get the Cluster Data Center view like the 'begine_entity '.

  3. for each view cluster overview the VirtualMachine bit cluster seen as 'begin_entity '.

  4. for each VM view, this information: VirtualMachine-> config-> hardware-> device of

  Above information is a table.

  I need help in order to extract information from this table disk, then run an if condition where the VM who got more than 2 discs should print.

  Could help you. I wrote the script to the point 4. just need advice for the posterior.

  Thank you.

  You can try one of the following values-

  1 If ($vm-> {'summary.config.numVirtualDisks'} > 2) {...}

  2 $diskCnt = grep {$_-> isa ('VirtualDisk')} @{$vm-> {'config.hardware.device'}};

  The above assumes that you've got your $vm with a filter property as follows:

  $vms = Vim::find_entity_views (view_type-online 'VirtualMachine'), the properties-online ['summary.config.numVirtualDisks', 'name', 'config.hardware.device'];

  my $vm foreach (@{$vms}) {}

  ...

  }

• T310 degraded virtual disk, all physical disks 'online '.

  It is a PowerEdge T310 server. Physical disk 0:0:3 showed physical way errors in the past, but after reinstalling the drive, everything was going well for a while. Now Dell OM reports that the virtual disk is degraded, but all four disks are online reports and have this green check mark by them.

  Nothing shows expected failure and I don't see any disk medium error, the firmware is up to date - is their something I don't see as to why my virtual drive would fail? I think there is always a problem with PD 0:0:3 even though she does not appear in the newspapers. Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

  PowerEdge T310, degraded virtual disk as of 04 21, 2015:

  

  All the physical disks on the other hand are very well reports:

  

  Errors of the past and present newspapers:

  

  

  -Very well, thank you for the suggestion!

• View log full messages and vSphere composer full of 'has-digest of virtual disk.

  Hello

  We have a server VMware Horizon 6 reviews were we have implemented a new pool VDI installed with Windows 7. This pool has been configured in the same way that we have configured the VDI pools in Windows XP, the only difference is the master that we use is installed in W7.

  The VDI seems to work very well, but we have two anomalies is possible, that you may know:

  1. in our vCenter, we are 5 'Has-digest of virtual disk' messages every minute.

  Our vCenter hosts of the composer and 2Cores and 12 GB of RAM.

  2. we have in the "vmware - viewcomposer.log ' message below every 5 seconds.

  2016-04-25 12:43:22, 528 | 62            | DEBUG | Sim.ServiceCore.SimServiceApiVal - call GetVersion.

  2016-04-25 12:43:22, 528 | 62            | DEBUG | ServiceCore.LockManager.OperationLockManager - drive lock has been released.

  2016-04-25 12:43:23, 206 | 62            | DEBUG | ServiceCore.Security.AuthorizedUsersManager - IsAccessAllowed() returns True for the user "domain\administrator".

  2016-04-25 12:43:23, 214 | 62            | DEBUG | ServiceCore.LockManager.OperationLockManager - drive lock has been acquired.

  2016-04-25 12:43:23, 214 | 62            | DEBUG | Sim.ServiceCore.SimServiceApiVal - GetAboutInfo of appeal.

  Does anyone know the origin of this behavior?

  Thanks for your help.

  DSI IMA

  1 virtual disk digest tasks are related to Accelerator storage being enabled on a pool view.

  2. it is a check made by the composer to make sure that the admin of composer has the rights of a local administrator on the server of composer. It's normal.

• Virtual disk strange behaviour - please help

  Hi all

  I wonder if anyone can help. I started to experience a strange problem on one of my VM today.  I have a virtual machine running freenas.  The storage drives the actions of free storage to sit on are physical disks connected directly to the virtual machine and run normally, because of the way the works of freenas real HDD can be small enough and for the virtual machine, it's a prealloue virtual disk is 16 GB in size.  It is the only virtual machine sitting on a physical hard drive 256 GB. Today, I noticed a problem that the file for the virtual machine has become 240 GB in size, is probably not a normal behavior for a 16 GB VM.

  I checked snapshots which he had two auto protect snapshots which I deleted and disabled auto protect. This was reported to the size of the folder up to 182 GB.

  On the use of exploerer to view the folder it seems to be a large number of files, as shown below. Can someone explain if it should be there?  Also, how else remove them safely.

  Thanks in advance

  Thanks for the offer, but after a lot of interference and a virtual machine rebuild I managed to solve the problem.

  The solution was to set the 2 drives physical independent mode with persistent active. for some reason unknown to me this seems to prevent the creation of multiple disk files, it seems workstation creates them even when there are no snapshots.

  Time will tell us but seems to have solved the problems. Fingers crossed

  Thanks for all the help guys.

• How can you save dead MacBook using FireWire for iMac? I can view all the files on iMac, but don't know how to back up before, I reinstall MacBook.

  My MacBook Pro doesn't start then you want to erase and reinstall iOS. Before doing this I want to back up all my files. If I connect to imac via FireWire I can view all the files, but how can I save it it?

  If your MacBook will start in target disk Mode, follow the instructions on how to set up and use...

  Share files between two computers with target - Apple Support disk mode

  But you do not want to share files, just to save them. You can make a "clone", using disk utility. For cloning utility purposes use a program likeSuperDuper! or double clone.

• How to install Firefox 7 on a virtual disk in Windows 7?

  Firefox automatically installs in my program files and won't let me change that. I have a permanent virtual disk. I think that Firefox would go faster if I installed it on the ram disk.

  That will probably not noticeable different because Firefox loads the files of program in memory after loading and the profile folder with all the personal data is located elsewhere.
  
  It is usually written causing the more delays, especially if anti-virus software checks each entry.

  See the Firefox profile folder:

  • http://KB.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox
  • Help > troubleshooting information > profile directory: opens showing the file

• new Pavilion dv5 laptop Virtual Disk Service restarts every minute

  New journal of events system dv5 - 1007ca is filled with entries saying the virtual disk Service stops, restarts 1 minute later, stops after 2 seconds, then resumes at new 1 minute later.   4 inputs each minute.

  I went back to the store and found the same thing is happening on all the dv5 on screen, as well as HP tx tablets.

  The deactivation of the service is not a solution because then you can't get in the Disk Manager, more I do not know what else.

  Everyone has noticed this?   or can suggest how to stop this behavior?

  Looks like it's all new dv5, not just mine.

  Thank you

  Ok thank you.  Start in safe mode led me to the solution.

• Reference Dell HDS - recommended VMware virtual disk - drives provided - basic and dynamic thin and thick.

  Can someone point me to the literature on best practices for guest disc formats?

  I know all the Compellent thin-provisions. However, in VMware 5.5, when you set up a virtual disk in the comments you have several choices:

  • Lazy provisioned to zero thickness
  • Eager provisioned to zero thickness
  • Provision of thin

  And then, at the level of the OS, you have the choice of:

  • Base
  • Dynamics

  I would like a pointer to the technical document explaining the advantages/disadvantages of each choice and recommended best practices.

  Kind regards

  Kath

  I would like to either thin or thick lazy to zero.  The two will take the same amount of data on the HDS.  The main decision is where you want to manage your storage space?  If dilute you on thin you need to make sure that you make no provision in both places.  If you have thick lazy to zero, then you can only on commissioning on one side.

  Say that I always thin on thin.  Recovery of the space at the level of the virtual computer is not officially supported immediately, but maybe someday.

  In a virtualized environment, always keep it simple.  There is no dynamic performance with virtualization

• Virtual disk expansion

  I've added four new hard drives at 8 on my ax100 and configured ' DISK POOL 1, include 11 records. A drive is configured as a hot spare. Then, I have expanded the "Virtual Disk 1' to include all the"POOL1 DISC' again. I was expecting the SAN will appear as a 6 to drive in Win2003. However, it proved that I need to format the 4 additional disks and set up as a new partition. I need a shared 6 to disk, not two separate 4TB and shared 2 TB drives. I plugged a different server in the same San using the switch, but it also shows the SAN as two separate partitions.

  Is there an operation that is not destructive to consolidate all readers, both old and newly added, in a huge partition/drive and see it as such in Win2003? It would be difficult to make two backups one 6 to SAN, destroy the virtual disk, recreate a large drive virtual and end of restoration. Help, please. Thank you.

  
  

• MD3000 cannot change virtual disk ownership / preffered path - ERROR 29

  Current configuration

  PowerVault MD3000 (deleted by the moderator) - attached to two servers PowerEdge R610 using Dell SAS 5/e card in each r610. The R610s act as a host ESX VMWare ESXi 5.5.0

  We have created multiple LUNS on the storage array and noticed that traffice all happening through a RAID controller or another module (and it seems to me not change without prompting when you look at the storage Bay). I turned off a two different virtual machines to try to change the path and had an error with a certain delay - I stuck this error below. I also tried to redistribute virtual disks tab the MDSM software nothing works support.

  By reading, it seems that the LUN should be attributed to a particular raid controller before all I / 0, but I still feel like're missing us something as to why we cannot distribute the traffic properly.

  According to some records for a MD3200 -.

  "If the host has a path of data unique to the MD, the virtual disk storage array.
  must be owned by the controller to which the host is connected.
  That's what we're trying to accomplish. I don't know if the hosts are to be physically detached from the SAN, or if there is a bit of software to fail us.
  Thank you in advance! If I failed to provide all the details, please let me know and I'll try to gather the information.
  Here's the error output:

  OPERATING ENVIRONMENT DATA

  Name of the client system: FLMGMT01
  Client OS: Windows Server 2008 R2

  Application version: 03.35.G6.88
  Storage management of version table: 03.35.G6.88
  Name of storage array: VAB-NAS-01
  Firmware version: 07.35.39.64
  Management class: devmgr.v1035api01.Manager

  **************************************************

  DATA ERROR

  Command sent to the RAID controller module to the location: 0
  Host name: 192.168.19.233
  IP address: 192.168.19.233

  Return code: error 29 - this operation cannot complete because there was a failure of authentication of security on a parameter in the command sent to the RAID controller module.

  Try the operation again. If this message persists, contact your Technical Support representative.
  Operation when the error occurred: PROC_assignVolumeOwnership
  Timestamp: August 25, 2014 16:18:59

  DATA BATTERY

  devmgr.v1035api01.Sam.JAL.ManagementOperationFailedException:
  at devmgr.v1035api01.sam.jal.SYMbolClient.dispatchOperation (unknown Source)
  at devmgr.v1035api01.sam.jal.StorageArrayFacade.issueCommand (unknown Source)
  at devmgr.v1035api01.sam.jal.StorageArrayFacade.sendCommandCommon (unknown Source)
  at devmgr.v1035api01.sam.jal.StorageArrayFacade.sendCommand (unknown Source)
  at devmgr.v1035api01.sam.jal.StorageArrayFacade.assignVolumeOwnership (unknown Source)
  at devmgr.v1035api01.sam.configuration.controller.ChangeControllerOwnershipDialogPanel.performCommitAction (unknown Source)
  to devmgr.v1035api01.shared.wizard.DialogPanel$ NotifyBackgroundTaskAdapter.performOp (unknown Source)
  at devmgr.v1035api01.shared.AbstractTaskAdapter.run (unknown Source)

  THREAD DATA

  Thread [reference Manager 10, System]
  Thread [finalizer, 8, System]
  Thread [dispatcher Signal, 9, System]
  Thread [attach auditor, 5, System]
  Thread [Java2D grinder, 10, System]
  Thread [TimerQueue, 5, System]
  Thread [Swing-Shell, 6, System]
  Thread [AWT-closure, 5, main]
  Thread [AWT-Windows, 6, main]
  Thread [EventQueueMonitor-ComponentEvtDispatch, 5, main]
  Thread [Thread-3, 5, main]
  Thread [AWT-EventQueue-0, 6, main]
  Thread [DestroyJavaVM, 5, main]
  Thread [SwingWorker-pool-2-wire-1, 5, main]
  Thread [ChangeDetector, 6, main]
  Thread [PreferenceStoreChangeDetector, 6, main]
  Thread [LogMsgThread, 6, main]
  Thread [Np_Link_Monitor0, 6, main]
  Thread [DMVGarbageCollectorThread, 6, main]
  Thread [RecoveryProfile-27, 6, main]
  Thread [NEA-28, 6, main]
  Thread [RecoveryProfile-30, 6, main]
  Thread [NEA-31, 6, main]
  Thread [Timer 0, 6, main]
  Thread [RecoveryProfile-35, 6, main]
  Thread [NEA-36, 6, main]
  Thread [RecoveryProfile-38, 6, main]
  Thread [NEA-39, 6, main]
  Thread [Timer 1, 6, main]
  Thread [Timer 2, 6, main]
  Thread [Timer-3 6, main]

  
  Thread [RecoveryProfile-48, 6, main]
  Thread [NEA-49, 6, main]
  Thread [Timer-4 6, main]
  Thread [RecoveryProfile-53, 6, main]
  Thread [NEA-54, 6, main]
  Thread [Timer-5 6, main]
  Thread [SwingWorker-pool-2-wire-2, 5, main]
  Thread [RecoveryProfile-69, 6, main]
  Thread [NEA-70, 6, main]
  Thread [Timer-14, 6, main]
  Thread [Timer-91, 6, main]
  Thread [host 2.3, principal of the Image]

  Hello MrRedPants,

  Since you are using a configuration not redundant you will have problems trying to modify the paths between the controllers since the two hosts have only a single connection to the MD3000.  What you could do if possible is to get 2 more SAS cables & connect ports second on the MD to RAID opposite that the host is currently connected to.

  Now, if this isn't an option so that you can make is to have 2 disk groups and assign the virtual disks / LUNS that are connected to each host in their own disk group.  If you go to each host their own groups of disks, then you will need to stop the e/s as you move the Ramdisk to the new group of disks so that you want to discard any data loss.

  Please let us know if you have any other questions.

• MD1220 disk expansion & expansion / resize virtual disk

  I seek to add 6 new MD1220 to a current configuration of 6 who are chained together.  Two quick questions on this...

  (1) is there as a limit to how many MD1220 can be connected?

  (2) once the virtual disks were created in all of my original 6 devices, is it possible to resize or add to this Setup?  Or I should blow away and recreate?

  Thank you
  Greg

  Hello Greg,.

  (1) is there as a limit to how many MD1220 can be connected?  You can put a maximum of 4 cases with the MD1220 can be chained together (which gives a total of 96 disks per SAS port).

  (2) once the virtual disks were created in all of my original 6 devices, is it possible to resize or add to this Setup?  Or I should blow away and recreate? You can add disks to your virtual drive and can increase the size, but depending on how much space you add that it can be faster to back up data and then recreate the virtual disk and restore your data.  A virtual disk expansion is really slow and it may take weeks or even months depending on the size of the virtual disk.

  Please let us know if you have any other questions.

• MD1000 attached to MD3000. Virtual disk not on the preferred path

  Hello

  I have a MD3000i box connected to 2 boxes of MD1000, these are connected to a Dell Power Vault Storage server 2003 running.

  Last night I connected the 2nd MD1000 and added in 25 TB of drives worth. I had initially hurt mapping the new virtual disk after 20 minutes or so, I noticed that I had shot the Ethernet cable plugged into the Module Raid 0 by mistake. I plugged it back in and was able to map the drive and started the initialization of disks.

  I came this morning to check how everything is done and found an error on the table. Disk not on favorite virtual path, preferred owner: at location 0 RAID Controller Module. Current owner: Module to slot 1 RAID controller. Group MD1000_2 of disc. Ramdisk: Virtual4.

  Now, it seems that influence the new virtual disk that I created. I checked the path virtual disk property and all the other virtual disks are using path 1 and try that I created to use channel 0.

  The virtual disk seems to be working for the moment it is detectable and to initialize itself in the area of operations of MDSM. I'm under pressure to get the space of storage as soon as possible, so I can't really afford to have to blow the virtual disk and restart the initialization. I'm hoping a simple reboot of the storage array will cure the problem, but I guess I can't do so until the end of the initialization of the disks. I could also remap the path to the virtual disk, but I saw online that it does not solve the problem, and I always have to wait until the initialization is complete.

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Hello

  I deleted the disk group and created a new one that even once, did not help even after that I tried to change the path. I deleted again and created a new and then changed to RAID 1 controller quickly while he was still on the controller 0 (before it came with the failure of the path) as the preferred path that has cleared the error. There must be a mistake with the controller or the wiring to it.

  Thank you

• Virtual disk MD3000i not on the preferred path

  Our MD3000i rpet table is not optimal and that a virtual disk is not on the preferred path.

  We have two RAID sets on it with a VD each.  The former says her favorite way is controller 0, the second said his preferred path is controller 1.  But the controller 0 like take charge of both.

  Using MD storage manager, I can change VD2 owned by controller 1.   But in the current for the next several hours, it passes backward, and the MD3000i starts orange flashing again.

  If I restart the server that is attached to it, the question usually begins without having to wait a few hours.

  I changed out Ethernet cables, and it did not help.  Either way, it all started when we changed the MD3000i attached to hosts.  It was attached to two Dell servers, now it is only attached to one.

  After looking through everything, it seems that the iSCSI initiator is configured incorrectly. It seems that you only have one configuration of IP and the MD has two available. Here is a link that has a step by step on setting up the MD3000i and the MPIO.

  http://paulgrevink.WordPress.com/2012/02/21/configure-Dell-MD3000i-MPIO-with-Windows-2008-R2/

  I would like to know how this happens. Also the only link that you have custody fall itself which normally points to a network problem may therefore need to look in the configuration of the switch as well.