VLAN trunks on bridges and native

Similar Questions

• VLAN Trunking between 6248 and 2848

  Hello

  I have a Powerconnect 6248 switch connected to a 2848 and I try to get a VLAN on the 2848.

  VLAN working and properly receive DHCP addresses, traffic lanes and DNS runs on the 6248.

  The Protocol DHCP, DNS server is connected to port 1 on the 6248.

  When I create a Trunk port on 3 the 6248 Port, allow all VLANS through it, creating a trunk on port 1 of the 2848 on VLAN10 and try to plug in devices inside, they can see all other devices connected to the L3 switch.

  The two switches are running the latest firmware and the L3 on his own works as expected. I can't get any kind of circuits working at L2, tried with normal cable and crossover switch.

  Here is the config of the L3 6248. Switch 2848 L2 has a blank canvas with 10 VLANS created on ports 1,2,3,4 with port 1 as the trunk port installation.

  Any ideas pleeease? Anyone? It drives me crazy.

  ************************

  <sub>! Current configuration:
  ! Description of the system "Powerconnect 6248, 3.2.0.7, VxWorks 6.5.
  ! Version of the software system 3.2.0.7
  ! Passage mode is configured as disabled
  !
  Configure
  database of VLAN
  VLAN 10,20,30
  VLAN 10 1 routing
  VLAN 20 2 routing
  VLAN 30 3 routing
  
  output
  battery
  1 2 Member
  output
  the IP 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
  field of IP domain name
  name-server IP 192.168.1.10
  IP routing
  interface vlan 10
  Routing
  IP 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
  output
  interface vlan 20
  Routing
  address 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0
  IP helper-address is 192.168.1.10
  output
  interface vlan 30
  Routing
  192.168.30.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
  IP helper-address is 192.168.1.10
  output
  level password user name 'administrator' encrypted 15 5f4dcc3b5aa765d61d8327deb882cf99
  l2relay DHCP
  DHCP l2relay vlan 10-90
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g1
  switchport mode general
  pvid switchport General 10
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 10,20,30
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g2
  switchport mode general
  pvid switchport General 10
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 10
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g3
  switchport mode trunk
  switchport trunk allowed vlan add 10.20
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g4
  switchport mode general
  pvid switchport General 10
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 10
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g5
  switchport mode general
  pvid switchport General 10
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 10
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g6
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 20
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 20
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g7
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 20
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 20
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g8
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 20
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 20
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g9
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 30
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 30
  output
  !
  interface ethernet 1/g10
  switchport mode general
  switchport General pvid 30
  No switchport acceptable-framework-type general tag only
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 30
  output</sub>

  After turning off spanning tree on the 2848, all works now.

  VLAN, trunking everything.

  Thanks for the help! :)

  I hope that if someone else can use what it took me ages to develop. I plugged on Netgear switches etc and they seem to work.

  The issue was going on between the dell 6248 and 2848, Spanning tree is enabled on the default 2848. If I was going to the Netgear via the 6248, then at the 2848 switches worked.

  My config on the l3 also works very well if someone would use :)

• Problem of BladeCenter ESX Server Vlan trunking

  VLAN for the ESX BladeCenter server problem

  ESX, Bladecenter, VLAN

  Hello

  The bladecenter was initially setup by a company and only allows me

  create a VM from Vlan 2. The problem is that I'm out of intellectual property that

  VLAN and I wanted the ability to use another address space for the

  VM I have already created a new vlan 20.

  This is the current configuration of the switch.  Everything I have added to these configurations to before was sw trunk allowed vlan add 20

  Switch CISCO 4500

  Interface Port - Channel 1

  switchport

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  !

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet5/39

  Description Port Trunk BLADECENTER-sw2-p17

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  channel-group mode 1 on

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet6/2

  Truck BLADECENTER-sw2-p17 Port Description

  switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  channel-group mode 1 on

  !

  Config - sw1 Bladecenter switch

  VLAN 2

  Server

  VLAN 3

  WAN

  VLAN 20

  Server2

  Interface Port - Channel 1

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  interface GigabitEthernet0/17

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  Cisco-switch macro description

  channel-group mode 1 on

  !

  interface GigabitEthernet0/18

  switchport vlan trunk native 3

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 3: 1-20

  Cisco-switch macro description

  channel-group mode 1 on

  Blade switchport where the host is contained

  interface GigabitEthernet0/9

  Description blade9

  switchport vlan trunk native 2

  switchport trunk allowed vlan 2.20

  switchport mode trunk.

  The host ESX IP is in Vlan 2

  End result is that I can't use any VLANS in this new range.  There is no Vlan ID or installation marking.

  Thanks in advance.

  Grand...

  Don't forget to assign points for correct or helpful answers

• Restricted Inter-VLAN with SG200-26 and SG300-10 routing

  Hi all

  My apologies if this has been covered elsewhere.

  My organization would like to organize a LAN game activity. The installation program I have in mind involves a switch 24 ports to connect all computers in player and saw that the switch connected to a smaller 'core' which has the connected the router and game server. I would like to know if I can put things up as follows...

  SG200-26 with 1 to 24 ports on VLANS separated so they can talk to eachother. I'd then ports 25 and 26 to be a trunk aggregated (for bandwidth and redundancy) port to carry all 24 VLAN more an additional management VLAN (VLAN 100 e.g.) that will be used to access the switch. I want these aggregated trunk ports to connect to a 'core' SG300-10 switch that is connected to the game server and a router for internet access.

  I would like to than the possibility of having two network connections of the server to the switch, one on the management of VLANS and the other on a VLAN different (e.g. 50 VLAN) which will be accessible by players (ports 1-24 of SG200-26). The power switch needs to be able to perform routing inter - VLAN restricted, because it does not VLAN 1-24 of eachother talk but they can talk to VLAN server, but only through specific service ports (e.g. 12345, 12346 port). Is this possible?

  Also how I configure the SG300-10 to enable the VLAN 1-24 of VLAN 50, but not to talk or VLAN 100. So, I will probably have the router on its own LAN VIRTUAL (VLAN 60 ex.) and allow for VLAN 1-24 for access, but only via HTTP port 80 for web access.

  What do you think?

  Thank you.

  Hi Marc, the default gateway of the computers will be the SVI to the switch.

  Router-> couche3-> SG300 layer 2 SG300

  router is 192.168.1.1

  VLAN 1 in 300 SG is 192.168.1.100

  2 VLAN on 300 SG is 192.168.2.1

  SG300 layer 2 has a 1u, 2 t trunk.

  My computer to connect to an access port 2 unidentified on the layer 2 SG300.

  I am able to ping 192.168.2.1

  I am able to ping 192.168.1.100

  I can not 192.168.1.1 pnig

  The reason is that the router has no idea on this subnet so cannot send the package to the source 192.168.2.x subnet.

  The ACL and the basic connection are 2 different animals. The ACL is to prevent intervlan communication. The basic connection must be tags trunk and vlan or static routes.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Cisco SLM224G VLAN Trunk Help! -&gt; Problem solved!

  Hi, I have a few difficulties of implementation of the switch, I can't understand how to configure the network for VLANs created port. I have configured under management of VLANS, VLAN 10 and 20, I asigned ports e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6 with 10 PVID and e7, e8, e9, e10, e11, e12 with 20 PVID and the rest to defaul 1 PVID, frame SD = All + infiltration on filtering. Under port to VLAN-> VLAN10-> ports e1, e2, e3, e4, e5, e6 Tagged + e24 tag (I want this to be the trunk) and the tag VLAN20-> e7, e8, e9, e10, e11, e12 Tagged + e24. Theats all that I set up according to the SLM_Admin_Guide.pdf and I have connected the e24 (trunk port) to a Pf meaning Server (the server is configured with the same VLAN ID as on the switch), please someone tell me how to set up the trunk? I know that there is no option in the Port settings to define 'Access' or 'Trunk'... until this means? that the SLM224G does not support the VLAN Trunk? I saw some screenshots with the Linksys SLM224G and he had 'Access' or 'Trunk' setting... and Cisco does NOT work.  Help!

  Hello

  Interesting, I see two different GUIs in your screen capture, it looks like two different computers. :-)

  But the big brother of the SLM, the series SRW and I am about what follows to the SRW series, because I do not have a SLM in front of me, I had put;

  Step 1. the port settings interface return, leaving the PVID to 1 then do scroll down and save the option.

  Step 2.  On this "ports setting photo GUI, you have, I would put the switch ports to shared resources in mode Trunk. If the port must not be tagged in the VLAN 1 only, then I leave the setting the port mode 'access '.

  (Access mode allows a port belong only to one VLAN no marked only).

  (shared mode allows the switch port belong to several VLANs marked, but still unmarked in one vlan only usually the vlan by default)

  Step 3.  So I goto the "Vlan to the port' tab, Tagged for ports beloning to vlan 10 then do scroll down and save the option."

  step 4   So I goto the "Vlan to the port' tab, Tagged for ports beloning to vlan 20 then do scroll down and save the option."

  By default vlan1 in most SRW series brother would then be not identified on all ports and vlan10 and vlan 20 could be labelled on the appropriate ports.

• Start a Discussion on vSphere / VLAN Trunking in ESXi

  This is my first post to this community of VMware, so please bear with me if I'm missing something simple. I went to a discussion to ask this question under vSphere, but for some reason that I'm not able. I chose to follow the community of vSphere, but for some reason it is grey when I try to choose to start a discussion. Thoughts and guidance?

  The real question, I would like to ask on vSphere is how to configure trunking VLAN on a single host (no vCenter) using the vswitch standard. I find a lot of links like this one http://www.rustyhann.com/ESXi-06-Create-vLAN.pdf that describe the process of setting up a trunk on the switch port, then assign a VLAN ID to the ports on the ESXi host groups. When I change the switch to a trunk port, I lose conductivity to the host, so I can manage it is no longer. In addition, on the host, I see no VLAN ID and I don't see any configuration which leads me to believe that the switch is inform the host (thru VLAN Trunking Protocol or any other means) which have the VLAN. I might be able to answer this question for my part, I can bypass the first issue. Thoughts and guidance?

  Thank you. Best.

  Hello

  You are on the appropriate tab, just type 100 or 200 should you able to type value. Check out the screenshots below.

  

  

  

  

  

• 802 1 q VLAN Trunking pilot

  Hello

  Refer to VMware ESX Server 3 802. 1 q VLAN Solutions (http://www.vmware.com/pdf/esx3_vlan_wp.pdf), the marking of comments of the VM mode (VGT), the document said about 802. 1 q VLAN trunking pilot use for the virtual machine. Can we know what it is and where to download?

  Kind regards

  Teeravee Sirinapasawasdee

  Never done it myself. Maybe this will help you

  http://www.lanarchitect.NET/articles/VLANTrunking/implementation/

• WAP300N as bridge and extender

  Is it possible to use the bridge and Extender mode at the same time with 2 WAP300N access points? I currently have a home network, where I have 2 access points wireless enabling to connect wireless devices and are bridged also to connect 2 cable networks. I want to know if I can get the same thing with 2 WAP300N devices.

  Hi, jochem.harteveld. Apparently, you can select a mode of operation at the same time.

• routers and access points and bridges and lions and tigers and bears oh my

  I studied and I'm still lost. Help please.

  I want the following configuration.

  Bedroom #1: contains my cable modem and a wireless device (wireless router I think).

  Bedroom #2: notebook with built-in wireless.

  Bedroom #3: several components (computers, printers, etc.) that are located on a wired LAN.

  What is the only wireless device that I can add to local wireline in the bedroom #3 for the device on the lan connect to internet through the device wireless in bedroom #1 and also connect to the laptop in the room #2.

  I want to all devices in the home to be on the same network (net sub?)-simple file sharing, sharing printers, etc.

  After hours of searching the Internet, I still don't know if the required device in the room three is a wireless access point, a wireless bridge and a switch, a wireless bridge and a hub, a tin man or cowardly lion.

  Lost in Oz, waiting for the Wiz (i.e. you)

  The Tin man would be the ideal solution. It could carry the USB with the information in both directions.

  Without Tinman, it gets complicated. You have several options. Ideally, I would recommend to connect a cable and not rely on a wireless bridge. It saves you more wireless bandwidth, is faster and more reliable. If it must be wireless:

  Option 1: Get a wireless, as the Linksys wet bridge. A wireless bridge connects to a wireless network existing and bridges the computer connected to the bridge across the network without wire on the other side (i.e. your router, other clients wireless and internet etc.)

  Option 2: Get a more flexible as the Linksys WAP access point. WAP can be configured as a bridge but also as repeaters and other modes. A WAP browser may be preferable to a WET if you also want a stronger additional wireless signal in the 3rd room. However, a WAP browser is much more expensive and more complex to configure.

  If you want only by cable in the 3rd room or the first room wireless signal is strong enough for the customers in the 3rd, just a wireless wet.

  To connect these devices wired in the 3rd room get a switch. Do not get a hub (if you get one free somewhere). Today, most of the devices are switches in any case, I guess. Never connect a real hub in a wireless bridge. A switch manages all the traffic between the devices connected to the switch directly in-house. A hub can cause additional traffic sent across the bridge...

• Best practices for the configuration of HTML5 and native connector at the same time.

  Is it possible to configure the HTML5 and native connector for my users? What would be the best configuration?

  The best way I found to do this is to create 2 web interface sites. one configured for native connector and one for HTML5. I put a URL in the message with a message center as "it is the site of native connector. Click on to HTML 5 ". A similar message with a URL to the site of native connector is on the site of HTML 5.

  Scott.

• Trouble with the voice and data Vlan vlan translate between CT3905 and SF300 - 24 p

  Hey actually, we have the solution to monitoring of implementation with CT3905 phone, SF300 - switches 24 p cameras and AIR-AP1041N Access Points

  

  We have the problem with the vlan tag in SF300 switch ports - 24 p we can´t tag vlan of the voice and data VLANs on the same port on SF300 - 24 p it is Possible or we must dedicate a port for each VLAN or ussing the same data segment of VLANs and vlan voice?

  Someone has an answer or technical documentation that can help us

  Best regards

  First of all,

  Please disable lldp transmit in SF 300 switch.

  The command is "no lldp transmitted."

  After you disable check the following steps.

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-27005

  facing the same problem with cisco SG 300 and 3905 ip phone switch.

  And nested thing was my 7945 and 6941 phones use to work properly, without above configuration.

  Cisco 3905 became not vlan Ip address votes and even if I put static, it did not work.

  After a long struggle, I was able to solve the problem. Now both phone and system work fine in the same port.

  Samantha

• Different colors of Bridg and Photoshop

  Hello!

  Something happened to the color
  management in bride/Photoshop. Previously, the colors were always the
  same thing when I moved from one program to the other. Now it doesn't work at all. I have
  discovered this problem yesterday, but have not worked in programs in the past
  months, so I don't know exactly when it happened. I have not changed anything
  the settings manually.
  
  I work at CS6 Bridge and Photoshop CS6 on PC.

  Anyone know how to solve?

  Nicely,

  ASA

  

  Hello

  Please refer to this link why my photos look different in Photoshop? Lightroom Queen

  Kind regards

  Sahil

• I just downloaded Bridge and Photoshop.  I don't see the RAW files in Bridge.

  I just downloaded Bridge and Photoshop.  I don't see the RAW files in Bridge.

  Hello!

  Is Photoshop (tell us the version) upward to date?

  You may need to get a new version of Camera Raw that supports your camera files (only one?) outputs.

  It lists the minimum version you need: https://helpx.adobe.com/camera-raw/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html

• The cheapest "Creative cloud photography Plan" includes it Bridge and Camera Raw?

  Hi people, I have used creative cloud four years now, only to use Photoshop for my work. I pay £17.58 per month (UK), but it seems to me that I could actually pay half, AND get included Lightroom (I'm on a subscription "an application" from now)... the problem is, I can't seem to find all the information about knowing if Bridge and Camera Raw would be included in the "Plan of photography" - they are essential for my work , so can not risk changing room for this plan, unless I know for sure. If anyone has the answer, it would be great. And if this is the case, can I also get 4 years of repayments, as I feel a little like I'm torn right now!

  Hi monkdave,

  There is a special plan designed for photographers, called "photography Plan" that includes Adobe Photoshop CC 2015, Lightroom CC 2015, CC 2015 and Camera Raw bridge.

  I think that the plan that you have right now is called "Only one App membership only for Photoshop" and this plan includes cloud storage space more (20 GB) relatively in terms of photography.

  Reference: Lightroom and Photoshop | Plan of creative photography of cloud of Adobe

  Kind regards

  Mohit

• Bridge and CS3 with D7100

  I've been away from photography for several years.  I recently purchassed a D7100 and shot some pictures in RAW.  I have Photoshop CS3 with Bridge and bridge does not recognize the images.  How can I get it to recognize pictures or do I have to upgrade?  What is my best solution?

  The D7100 requires at least Camera Raw 7.4, which again requires Photoshop CS6.

  The only way that you can work with these raw files in CS3 is to use the free DNG Converter to convert raw files to DNG, which can be read by CS3.

  This means you'll be missing out on new features and improved raw processing that have been added to the cab since CS3 was released.

  I recommend to make the most of your raw files, subscribing to the plan of creative photography of Cloud, which includes Photoshop and Lightroom for $10 per month.