VPN Butterfly flow

Similar Questions

• Lost wallpaper Butterfly (butterfly flower HP)

  Hey there,

  I have a HP Butterfly flower, limited edition, and I lost the wallpaper that comes by default (the one with the butterfly) to match the design of the laptop. I would like to know if someone of you has got it yet and could share with me?

  * HP Butterfly flower *.

  Recognizing.

  @victtoremanoel_

  Here you go:

  https://www.Flickr.com/photos/co11een/16981940801

  and

  https://www.Flickr.com/photos/co11een/16795453650

  I just did a snip of each of them on my screen (1920 X 1080 high definition screen).

  Click on the image to isolate it, save the capture to a jpg file.

  Set the jpg as the background... Pouf!  Wallpaper.

  Snipping Tool - Windows 7

  Snipping Tool Windows 8.x

  When you see a post that will help you,

  Who inspires you, gives a cool idea,

  Or you learn something new.

  Click the 'Thumbs Up' on this post.

  My answer-click accept as Solution to help others find answers.

• Return VPN traffic flows do not on the tunnel

  Hello.

  I tried to find something on the internet for this problem, but am fails miserably. I guess I don't really understand how the cisco decides on the road.

  In any case, I have a Cisco 837 which I use for internet access and to which I would like to be able to complete a VPN on. When I vpn (using vpnc in a Solaris box as it happens which is connected to the cisco ethernet interface), I can establish a VPN and when I ping a host on the inside, I see this package ping happen, however, the return package, the cisco 837 is trying to send via the public internet facing interface Dialer1 without encryption. I can't work for the life of me why.

  (Also note: I can also establish a tunnel to the public internet, but again, I don't can not all traffic through the tunnel.) I guess I'm having the same problem, IE back of packages are not going where it should be, but I do know that for some, on the host being ping well, I can see the ping arriving packets and the host responds with a response to ICMP echo).

  Here is the version of cisco:

  version ADSL #show
  Cisco IOS software, software C850 (C850-ADVSECURITYK9-M), Version 12.4 (15) T5, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc4)
  Technical support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
  Copyright (c) 1986-2008 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
  Updated Friday 1 May 08 02:07 by prod_rel_team

  ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.3 (8r) YI4, VERSION of the SOFTWARE

  ADSL availability is 1 day, 19 hours, 27 minutes
  System to regain the power ROM
  System restarted at 17:20:56 CEST Sunday, October 10, 2010
  System image file is "flash: c850-advsecurityk9 - mz.124 - 15.T5.bin".

  Cisco 857 (MPC8272) processor (revision 0 x 300) with 59392K / 6144K bytes of memory.
  Card processor ID FCZ122391F5
  MPC8272 CPU Rev: Part Number 0xC, mask number 0 x 10
  4 interfaces FastEthernet
  1 ATM interface
  128 KB of non-volatile configuration memory.
  20480 bytes K of on board flash system (Intel Strataflash) processor

  Configuration register is 0 x 2102

  And here is the cisco configuration (IP address, etc. changed of course):

  Current configuration: 7782 bytes
  !
  ! Last configuration change at 11:57:21 CEST Monday, October 11, 2010 by bautsche
  ! NVRAM config updated at 11:57:22 CEST Monday, October 11, 2010 by bautsche
  !
  version 12.4
  no service button
  tcp KeepAlive-component snap-in service
  a tcp-KeepAlive-quick service
  horodateurs service debug datetime localtime show-timezone msec
  Log service timestamps datetime localtime show-timezone msec
  encryption password service
  sequence numbers service
  !
  hostname adsl
  !
  boot-start-marker
  boot-end-marker
  !
  logging buffered 4096
  enable secret 5
  !
  AAA new-model
  !
  !
  AAA authentication login local_authen local
  AAA authentication login sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1 local
  AAA authorization exec local local_author
  AAA authorization sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 LAN
  !
  !
  AAA - the id of the joint session
  clock timezone gmt 0
  clock daylight saving time UTC recurring last Sun Mar 01:00 last Sun Oct 01:00
  !
  !
  dot11 syslog
  no ip source route
  dhcp IP database dhcpinternal
  No dhcp use connected vrf ip
  DHCP excluded-address IP 10.10.7.1 10.10.7.99
  DHCP excluded-address IP 10.10.7.151 10.10.7.255
  !
  IP dhcp pool dhcpinternal
  import all
  Network 10.10.7.0 255.255.255.0
  router by default - 10.10.7.1
  Server DNS 212.159.6.9 212.159.6.10 212.159.13.49 212.159.13.50
  !
  !
  IP cef
  property intellectual auth-proxy max-nodata-& 3
  property intellectual admission max-nodata-& 3
  no ip bootp Server
  nfs1 host IP 10.10.140.207
  name of the IP-server 212.159.11.150
  name of the IP-server 212.159.13.150
  !
  !
  !
  username password cable 7
  username password bautsche 7
  vpnuser password username 7
  !
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 2
  BA aes 256
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 3
  BA 3des
  Prior authentication group part 2
  the local address SDM_POOL_1 pool-crypto isakmp client configuration
  !
  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group groupname2
  key
  DNS 10.10.140.201 10.10.140.202
  swangage.co.uk field
  pool SDM_POOL_1
  users of max - 3
  netmask 255.255.255.0
  !
  ISAKMP crypto client configuration group groupname1
  key
  DNS 10.10.140.201 10.10.140.202
  swangage.co.uk field
  pool SDM_POOL_1
  users of max - 3
  netmask 255.255.255.0
  ISAKMP crypto sdm-ike-profile-1 profile
  groupname2 group identity match
  client authentication list sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1
  ISAKMP authorization list sdm_vpn_group_ml_1
  client configuration address respond
  ISAKMP crypto profile sdm-ike-profile-2
  groupname1 group identity match
  ISAKMP authorization list sdm_vpn_group_ml_1
  client configuration address respond
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac ESP_MD5_3DES
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac
  !
  crypto dynamic-map SDM_DYNMAP_1 1
  Set the security association idle time 3600
  game of transformation-ESP-AES-256-SHA
  market arriere-route
  crypto dynamic-map SDM_DYNMAP_1 2
  Set the security association idle time 3600
  game of transformation-ESP-AES-256-SHA
  market arriere-route
  !
  !
  card crypto SDM_CMAP_1 client authentication list sdm_vpn_xauth_ml_1
  map SDM_CMAP_1 isakmp authorization list sdm_vpn_group_ml_1 crypto
  map SDM_CMAP_1 65535-isakmp dynamic SDM_DYNMAP_1 ipsec crypto
  !
  Crypto ctcp port 10000
  Archives
  The config log
  hidekeys
  !
  !
  synwait-time of tcp IP 10
  !
  !
  !
  Null0 interface
  no ip unreachable
  !
  ATM0 interface
  no ip address
  no ip redirection
  no ip unreachable
  no ip proxy-arp
  route IP cache flow
  No atm ilmi-keepalive
  PVC 0/38
  aal5mux encapsulation ppp Dialer
  Dialer pool-member 1
  !
  DSL-automatic operation mode
  waiting-224 in
  !
  interface FastEthernet0
  !
  interface FastEthernet1
  !
  interface FastEthernet2
  !
  interface FastEthernet3
  !
  interface Vlan1
  Description $FW_INSIDE$
  10.10.7.1 IP address 255.255.255.0
  IP access-group 121 to
  no ip redirection
  no ip unreachable
  no ip proxy-arp
  IP nat inside
  IP virtual-reassembly
  route IP cache flow
  map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto
  Hold-queue 100 on
  !
  interface Dialer1
  Description $FW_OUTSIDE$
  the negotiated IP address
  IP access-group 121 to
  no ip redirection
  no ip unreachable
  no ip proxy-arp
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  encapsulation ppp
  route IP cache flow
  No cutting of the ip horizon
  Dialer pool 1
  Dialer idle-timeout 0
  persistent Dialer
  Dialer-Group 1
  No cdp enable
  Authentication callin PPP chap Protocol
  PPP chap hostname
  PPP chap password 7
  map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto
  !
  local IP SDM_POOL_1 10.10.148.11 pool 10.10.148.20
  IP local pool public_184 123.12.12.184
  IP local pool public_186 123.12.12.186
  IP local pool public_187 123.12.12.187
  IP local pool internal_9 10.10.7.9
  IP local pool internal_8 10.10.7.8
  IP local pool internal_223 10.10.7.223
  IP local pool internal_47 10.10.7.47
  IP forward-Protocol ND
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Dialer1
  IP route 10.10.140.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.7.2
  !
  no ip address of the http server
  no ip http secure server
  IP nat inside source overload map route SDM_RMAP_1 interface Dialer1
  IP nat inside source static 10.10.7.9 123.12.12.184
  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.7.8 22 123.12.12.185 22 Expandable
  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.7.8 25 123.12.12.185 25 expandable
  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.7.8 80 123.12.12.185 80 extensible
  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.7.8 443 123.12.12.185 443 extensible
  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.7.8 993 123.12.12.185 993 extensible
  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.7.8 123.12.12.185 1587 1587 extensible
  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.10.7.8 8443 123.12.12.185 8443 extensible
  IP nat inside source static 10.10.7.223 123.12.12.186
  IP nat inside source static 10.10.7.47 123.12.12.187
  !
  record 10.10.140.213
  access-list 18 allow one
  access-list 23 permit 10.10.140.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 23 permit 10.10.7.0 0.0.0.255
  Access-list 100 category SDM_ACL = 2 Note
  access-list 100 deny ip any 10.10.148.0 0.0.0.255
  access ip-list 100 permit a whole
  Note access-list 121 SDM_ACL category = 17
  access-list 121 deny udp any eq netbios-dgm all
  access-list 121 deny udp any eq netbios-ns everything
  access-list 121 deny udp any eq netbios-ss all
  access-list 121 tcp refuse any eq 137 everything
  access-list 121 tcp refuse any eq 138 everything
  access-list 121 tcp refuse any eq 139 all
  access ip-list 121 allow a whole
  access-list 125 permit tcp any any eq www
  access-list 125 permit udp any eq isakmp everything
  access-list 125 permit udp any any eq isakmp
  access-list 194 deny udp any eq isakmp everything
  access-list 194 deny udp any any eq isakmp
  access-list 194 allow the host ip 123.12.12.184 all
  IP access-list 194 allow any host 123.12.12.184
  access-list 194 allow the host ip 10.10.7.9 all
  IP access-list 194 allow any host 10.10.7.9
  access-list 195 deny udp any eq isakmp everything
  access-list 195 deny udp any any eq isakmp
  access-list 195 allow the host ip 123.12.12.185 all
  IP access-list 195 allow any host 123.12.12.185
  access-list 195 allow the host ip 10.10.7.8 all
  IP access-list 195 allow any host 10.10.7.8
  not run cdp
  public_185 allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 195
  !
  public_184 allowed 10 route map
  corresponds to the IP 194
  !
  allowed SDM_RMAP_1 1 route map
  corresponds to the IP 100
  !
  !
  control plan
  !
  !
  Line con 0
  connection of authentication local_authen
  no activation of the modem
  preferred no transport
  telnet output transport
  StopBits 1
  line to 0
  connection of authentication local_authen
  telnet output transport
  StopBits 1
  line vty 0 4
  access-class 23 in
  privilege level 15
  authorization exec local_author
  connection of authentication local_authen
  length 0
  preferred no transport
  transport input telnet ssh
  !
  max-task-time 5000 Planner
  Scheduler allocate 4000 1000
  Scheduler interval 500
  130.88.202.49 SNTP server
  130.88.200.98 SNTP server
  130.88.200.6 SNTP server
  130.88.203.64 SNTP server
  end

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Thank you very much.

  Ciao,.

  Eric

  Hi Eric,.

  (Sorry for the late reply - needed some holidays)

  So I see that you have a few steps away now. I think that there are 2 things we can try:

  1)

  I guess you have provided that:

  IP nat inside source overload map route SDM_RMAP_1 interface Dialer1

  Since the routemap refers to ACL 100 to define the traffic to be translated, we can exclude traffic that initiates the router:

  Access-list 100 category SDM_ACL = 2 Note

  access-list 100 deny ip 123.12.12.185 host everything
  access-list 100 deny ip any 10.10.148.0 0.0.0.255
  access ip-list 100 permit a whole

  Which should prevent the source udp 4500 to 1029 changing port

  OR

  2)

  If you prefer to use a different ip address for VPN,

  Then, you can use a loop like this:

  loopback interface 0

  123.12.12.187 the IP 255.255.255.255

  No tap

  map SDM_CMAP_1 crypto local-address loopback 0

  I don't think you should apply card encryption to the loopback interface, but it's been a while since I have configured something like that, so if you have problems first try and if still does not get the crypto debugs new (isakmp + ipsec on the vpn, nat router on the router of the client package).

  HTH

  Herbert

• VPN poor Performance - Cisco RV220W and routers WRVS4400N

  Hello

  To one of our customer IPSec VPN is established between Cisco RV 220W and routers of Cisco WRVS4400N.

  Router VPN /ISP details are as below

  Location was	Location B
  Details of the Internet ---------------------- DOWNLOAD: 6 to 10 Mbps Upload: 1 to 2 Mbps Details of router ---------------------- Cisco RV220W Firmware: 1.0.3.5 IKE policy Encryption: 3DES Authentication: MD5 Group: Group 2 Life key: 28800 sec VPN strategy Encryption: 3DES Authentication: SHA - 1 Group: 1024 bits (Group 2) Life key: 3 600 s Perfect Forward Secrecy: enabled	Details of the Internet ------------------------- DOWNLOAD: 1.35 Mbps Upload: 1.24 Mbps Details of router ---------------------- Cisco WRVS4400N Firmware version: V2.0.1.3 Phase 1 Encryption: 3DES Authentication: MD5 Group: 1024 bits (Group 2) Life key: 28800 sec Phase 2 Encryption: 3DES Authentication: SHA - 1 Group: 1024 bits (Group 2) Life key: 3 600 s Perfect Forward Secrecy: enabled

  From the day that VPN has been implemented, the performance was poor. Frequent disconnections sessions live to the VPN nodes and very low transfer rate was alarming to users.

  The servers in A location and users to the site B gets authenticated at the server DC level in A location

  Applications of Terminal Server remote as Quickbooks, QQ Evolution, attendance RX serve also the location has by users to the location B

  The login is your time and all applications are extremely slow.

  I tried to copy files between share data between two locations and the results are as follows

  Location A to location B-> 130 Kbps 140 Kbps

  Location location B A-> 150 Kbps to 160 Kbps

  What can be the problem for these poor performance VPN?

  -Change the encryption for the least secure OF THE /MD5 would have a significant impact because it can reduce the overload on the routers?

  -Even if both routers are routers SMB, it has really good VPN flow according to the data sheets. I couldn't find VPN flow mentioned in the WRVS4400N data sheet. One of the sons of CSC, I also noticed the VPN of WRVS4400N flow seemed really low as only about 1.6Mbps. (https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2107881)  Whereas RV220W router has VPN 90Mbps flow, according to the datasheet.

  So, what can be the cause of the problem and what can be fixes possible?

  Help, please!

  ANUP sisi

  Beginner to router Cisco VPN, please help

  RVS4000 was designed to work in a small office. It supports 5 VPN tunnels with a maxium of 2 Mbps flow measured in a laboratory environment. It has a processor that has a motor integrated IPS, who would deliver 20 Mbps LAN - WAN throughput when IPS is enabled.

  RV220W has been designed to operate in a slightly larger office with 25 IPsec VPN tunnels. It has a processor that has a built-in cryptographic engine able to deliver throughput 90 Mbps of IPsec. RV220W also supports 5 SSL VPN tunnels that can be used by employees and business partners for remote access.

• Routing VPN Ipsec

  Morning,

  I have an ASA 5520 of Cisco running 8.4 (5). When to use a VPN ipsec client and it connects to the local network, how the connection interprets her return flights. Currently, I have all my servers pointing to the front door on our old firewall. I have a different gateway on the new Cisco firewall. It is a transitional phase we are permanently than one Cisco ASA 5520 firewall. For testing purposes, we want to test the configuration of the VPN client with our front Radius Server cut us above. Test users must connect to resources on the corporate network. Should I put a route on the old firewall so when packets hit VPN servers they will know how to return to the VPN tunnel or the source and destination address will already be taken into account when the tunnel VPN hits the server, packages will return to the tunnel. The Cisco VPN client does not NAT configuration. Once we feel that the test is passed, we will change the gateway from the Cisco ASA 5520 to match the existing bridge for all resources on the network.

  Information or advice would be greatly appreciated?

  Thank you

  Carlos

  On the SAA, you set up a pool of IP addresses for the client. This pool should be aligned on the subnet boundaries. On your infrastructure (L3 switch or your old firewall), you tricky staric asa for this pool-network. Thereby the packages of answer-VPN-will flow to the ASA.

  Sent by Cisco Support technique iPad App

• Wal-Mart renovated computer hp games

  I wonder if the butterfly flower hp shipped with hp games

  Hi alice92705:
  If your friend has it she can tell you how to get the same set of software. OK, kido. If you need assistance, transfer a copy for his computer game. I can help guide you do this task or your parents if the computer that you found does not have the game. Ok. It is a task was simple, that's how I have to install games on HP Touchsmart laptop HP DV witch - 7 6135dx 600-1050. We really don't know until you open the software preinstalled on your new laptop. A few times HP will change the software that they installed. There is a real good possibility for that, if she did. Ok. Your welcome frrw.

• SNMP version 3 version of Pix 515E 7.0?

  Can anyone tell if snmp version 3 is supported on any release of the version 7 PIX. And if not, Cisco plans to PIX? I can't find any information about snmp v3 on PIX. the only reference view's switches and routers. your in advance

  Hello

  7.0 (1) version adds support for SNMPv2c, offer new services, including counters 64 (useful for packets on Gigabit Ethernet interfaces counters) and support to MIB data transfers in bulk. In addition, Version 7.0 includes SNMPv2 MIB (RFC 1907) and the IF - MIB (RFC 1573 and 2233) and the Cisco IPSec Monitoring MIB Flow, giving visibility full VPN statistical flow tunnel uptime, bytes/packet transferred, and much more.

  Answering your question, unfortunately version 3 is not supported.

  It will be useful.

  Franco Zamora

• problem of traffic flow with tunnel created the network with a tunnel to a VPN concentrator

  Hi, I worked with Cisco and the seller for 2 weeks on this.II am hoping that what we are witnessing will ring a Bell with someone.

  Some basic information:

  I work at a seller who needs from one site to the other tunnel.  There are currently 1 site to another with the seller using a Juniper SSG, which works without incident in my system.  I'm transitioning to routers Cisco 2811 and put in place a new tunnel with the seller for the 2800 uses a different public ip address in my address range.  So my network has 2 tunnels with the provider that uses a Cisco VPN concentrator.  The hosts behind the tunnel use 20x.x.x.x public IP addresses.

  My Cisco router will create a tunnel, but I can't not to hosts on the network of the provider through the Cisco 2811, but I can't get through the tunnel of Juniper.  The seller sees my packages and provider host meets them and sends them to the tunnel.  They never reach the external interface on my Cisco router.

  I'm from the external interface so that my endpoint and the peers are the same IP address.  (note, I tried to do a static NAT and have an address of tunnel and my different host to the same result.)  Cisco has confirmed that I do have 2 addresses different and this configuration was a success with the creation of another successful tunnels toa different network.)

  I tested this configuration on a network of transit area before moving the router to the production network and my Cisco 2811 has managed to create the tunnel and ping the inside host.  Once we moved the router at camp, we can no longer ping on the host behind the seller tunnel.   The seller assured me that the tunnel setting is exactly the same, and he sees his host to send traffic to the tunnel.  The seller seems well versed with the VPN concentrator and manages connections for many customers successfully.

  The seller has a second VPN concentrator on a separate network and I can connect to this VPN concentrator with success of the Cisco 2811 who is having problems with the hub, which has also a tunnel with Gin.

  Here is what we have done so far:

  (1) confirm the config with the help of Cisco 2811.  The tunnel is up.  SH cyrpto ipa wristwatch tunnel upward.
  (2) turn on Nat - T side of the tunnel VPN landscapers
  (3) confirm that the traffic flows properly a tunnel on another network (which would indicate that the Cisco config is ok)
  (4) successfully, tunnel and reach a different configuration hosting
  (5) to confirm all the settings of tunnel with the seller
  (6) the seller confirmed that his side host has no way and that it points to the default gateway
  (7) to rebuild the tunnel from scratch
  8) confirm with our ISP that no way divert traffic elsewhere.  My gateway lSP sees my directly connected external address.
  (9) confirm that the ACL matches with the seller
  (10) I can't get the Juniper because he is in production and in constant use

  Is there a known issue with the help of a VPN concentrator to connect to 2 tunnels on the same 28 network range?

  Options or ideas are welcome.  I had countless sessions with Cisco webex, but do not have access to the hub of the seller.  I can forward suggestions.

  Here's a code

  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  md5 hash
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 2
  BA 3des
  preshared authentication
  Group 2

  Crypto ipsec transform-set mytrans aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 30
  Set transform-set RIGHT

  ISAKMP crypto key address No.-xauth

  interface FastEthernet0/0
  Description $ETH-LAN$$ETH-SW-LAUNCH$$INTF-INFO-FE $ 0/0
  IP 255.255.255.240
  IP access-group 107 to
  IP access-group out 106
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  route IP cache flow
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  crypto mymap map

  logging of access lists (applied outside to get an idea of what will happen.  No esp traffic happens, he has never hits)

  allowed access list 106 esp host host newspaper
  106 ip access list allow a whole
  allowed access list 107 esp host host Journal
  access-list 107 permit ip host host Journal

  access-list 107 permit ip host host Journal
  107 ip access list allow a whole

  Crypto isa HS her
  IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association
  status of DST CBC State conn-id slot
    QM_IDLE ASSETS 0 1010

  "Mymap" ipsec-isakmp crypto map 1
  Peer =.
  Extend the 116 IP access list
  access - list 116 permit ip host host (which is a public IP address))
  Current counterpart:
  Life safety association: 4608000 kilobytes / 2800 seconds
  PFS (Y/N): N
  Transform sets = {}
  myTrans,
  }

  OK - so I have messed around the lab for 20 minutes and came up with the below (ip are IP test:-)

  (4) ip nat pool crypto-nat 10.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 prefix length 30 <> it comes to the new address of NAT

  !
  (1) ip nat inside source list 102 interface FastEthernet0/0 overload <> it comes to the interface by default NAT

  !
  IP nat inside source map route overload of crypto-nat of crypto-nat pool <> it is the policy of the NAT function

  !

  (6) access-list 101 permit ip 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> defines the IP source and destination traffic

  !

  (2) access-list 102 deny ip 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> does not NAT the normal communication

  (3) access-list 102 deny ip 10.1.1.1 host 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> does not re - NAT NAT

  (1) access-list 102 permit ip 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 any <> allows everyone else to use the IP Address of the interface for NAT

  !

  (5) crypto-nat route-map permit 5 <> condition for the specific required NAT
  corresponds to the IP 101 <> game of traffic source and destination IP must be NAT'td

  (7) access list 103 permit ip 10.1.1.1 host 172.16.2.0 0.0.0.255 <> crypto acl

  Then, how the works above, when a package with the what IP 172.16.1.0/24 source wants to leave the router to connect to google, say the source will change to IP interface (1).  When 172.16.1.0/24 wants to talk to172.16.2.0/24, it does not get translated (2).  When the remote end traffic equaled the following clause of NAT - the already NAT'td IP will not be affected again (3) when a host 172.16.1.0/24 wants to communicate with 172.16.2.20/24 we need a NAT NAT specific pool is required (4).  We must define a method of specific traffic to apply the NAT with a roadmap (5) which applies only when the specific traffic (6), then simply define the interesting traffic to the VPN to initiate and enable comms (7) corresponding

• Flow on the client machine connected RAS VPN multicast

  Hi all

  I got a requirment, it is the flow of Muliticast need access via RAS VPN

  Scanario: I have ASA 5540 peripheral, configured profile RAS and user that connects to the ASA device to the standard access via VPN server.

  We have now posted on the Web and flow need to access the profile of RAS VPN PCF. Please let me know is technically possible to configure configuration mulitcast and is the machine of the client user can access flow via VPN. Help, please

  Unfortunately, this is not supported with the customers of the software.  You need a router IOS any if you want to multicast via VPN.

  -Jason

• Slow flow on MPLS VPN WAN

  Anyone have any ideas why a portion of the traffic is slow as it passes through a VPN MPLS WAN. My FTP copies are fast but copy all windows or windows file transfers are slow. Copies of windows are about three times slower as the FTP transfers. Can be optimized on routers or switches?

  Hello

  Thus, all transfers are done with CIFS are slow and other then CIFS are ok?

  All transfers are between XP/7 and servers (before 2008)?

  Please take a look at http://bit.ly/rkh9IM

  CIFS (or SMB) prior to the 2008 version is slow by definition as it can not cope with very good latency. Other protocols such as HTTP and FTP run much smoother.

  When you run Server 2008 (or better) combination with Windows Vista (or better) should solve some of your problems as it can using SMBv2.

  What actual speed is your order on the MPLS and what is the maximum transfer reached between server and workstation?

  Best regards, G.

• Flow ip VPN in one direction

  Hello

  I have a VPN from Site to Site that works finein one direction, distance to the Center, i.e. it goes upward, using VNC to connect remotely to Central or vice-versa works, on the back (Central remotely) No and ping is not two-way.

  IMHO, it would take something lack on the central site, because if I ping from central lan to lan remote or vice versa asa central says:

  No group of translation found for icmp src, dst domestic: domestic IP_ON_CENTRAL_LAN: IP_ON_REMOTE_LAN (type 8, code 0)

  Distance is on nat0, i.e. I

  IP LocalLAN 255.255.255.0 RemoteLAN 255.255.255.0 allow Access-list extended inside_nat0_outbound

  inside_nat0_outbound list extended access allow icmp LocalLAN 255.255.255.0 RemoteLAN 255.255.255.0

  IP LocalLAN 255.255.255.0 RemoteLAN 255.255.255.0 allow Access-list extended outside_1_cryptomap

  outside_1_cryptomap list extended access allow icmp LocalLAN 255.255.255.0 RemoteLAN 255.255.255.0

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_nat0_outbound

  NAT (inside) 0 inside_nat0_outbound list of outdoor access

  card crypto outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap

  outside_map game 1 card crypto peer REMOTE_PUBLIC_IP

  On the remote control (a pix 501), I have:

  inside_outbound_nat0_acl LanRemote 255.255.255.0 LanCentral 255.255.255.0 ip access list allow

  access-list allowed inside_outbound_nat0_acl icmp LanRemote 255.255.255.0 LanCentral 255.255.255.0

  outside_cryptomap_20 LanRemote 255.255.255.0 LanCentral 255.255.255.0 ip access list allow

  access-list allowed outside_cryptomap_20 icmp LanRemote 255.255.255.0 LanCentral 255.255.255.0

  NAT (inside) 0-list of access inside_outbound_nat0_acl

  outside_map 20 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  card crypto outside_map 20 match address outside_cryptomap_20

  card crypto outside_map 20 game peers CENTRAL_PUBLIC_IP

  outside_map card crypto 20 the transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 value

  outside_map interface card crypto outside

  What I am doing wrong?

  Thank you

  No group of translation found for icmp src, dst domestic: domestic IP_ON_CENTRAL_LAN: IP_ON_REMOTE_LAN (type 8, code 0)

  something is wrong with the routing on Central

• % 305013-5-ASA: rules asymmetrical NAT matched for flows forward and backward; Connection refused because of the failure of the path opposite. NAT VPN clients problems after that put 8.3.2 to level.

  I've recently updated to 8.3.2 and I have been informed of these NAT changes, but even after reading the https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-12569 I am still unable to rectify the communication network 192.168.100.0 VPN with hosts on 172.16.1.0 and 172.16.9.0. VPN clients connect to the external interface, and I try to ping inside and the demilitarized zone, respectable 172.16.1.0 and 172.16.9.0 hosts. VPN client shows that the two previously mentioned networks such as roads of security, but still not to the ping pong.

  # sh nat

  Manual NAT policies (Section 1)

  1 (inside) to the (whole) source static obj - 172.16.9.0 obj - 172.16.9.0 destination static obj - obj - unidirectional 192.168.100.0 192.168.100.0

  translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 0

  2 (inside) to the (whole) source static obj - 172.16.1.0 obj - 172.16.1.0 destination static obj - obj - unidirectional 192.168.100.0 192.168.100.0

  translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 0

  3 (inside) to the (whole) source static obj - 172.16.1.0 obj - 172.16.1.0 destination static obj - 172.16.12.0 obj - one-way 172.16.12.0

  translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 0

  4 (dmz) to (outside) source static obj - 172.16.9.0 obj - 172.16.9.0 destination static obj - obj - unidirectional 192.168.100.0 192.168.100.0

  translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 0

  5 (dmz) to (outside) source static obj - 172.16.9.0 obj - 172.16.9.0 destination static obj - 172.16.12.0 obj - one-way 172.16.12.0

  translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 0

  Auto NAT policies (Section 2)

  1 (dmz), to the source (external) static obj - 172.16.9.5 interface tcp www www service

  translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 142

  2 (dmz) (outdoor) source static obj - 172.16.9.5 - 01 interface service tcp 3389 3389

  translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 2

  3 (dmz) (outdoor) source static obj - 172.16.9.5 - 02 interface tcp ldap ldap service

  translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 0

  4 (dmz) (outdoor) source static obj interface - 172.16.9.5 - 03 service ftp ftp tcp

  translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 0

  5 (dmz) to (outside) of the source static obj - 172.16.9.5 - 04 interface tcp smtp smtp service

  translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 267

  6 (inside) source static obj - 172.16.9.0 172.16.9.0 (dmz)

  translate_hits = 4070, untranslate_hits = 224

  7 (inside) to (dmz) source static obj - 10.1.0.0 10.1.0.0

  translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 0

  8 (inside) to (dmz) source static obj - 172.16.0.0 172.16.0.0

  translate_hits = 152, untranslate_hits = 4082

  9 (dmz) to dynamic interface of the obj - 172.16.9.0 - 01 source (outdoor)

  translate_hits = 69, untranslate_hits = 0

  10 (inside) to the obj_any interface dynamic source (external)

  translate_hits = 196, untranslate_hits = 32

  I think you must following two NAT config

  NAT (inside, outside) source static obj - 172.16.1.0 obj - 172.16.1.0 destination static obj - 192.168.100.0 obj - 192.168.100.0
  NAT (dmz, external) source static obj - 172.16.9.0 obj - 172.16.9.0 destination static obj - 192.168.100.0 obj - 192.168.100.0

  Please configure them and remove any additional NAT configuration and then try again.

• L2l VPN is up but no traffic flow

  Hi people,

  Im trying to set up a VPN L2L between a 1841 and a NSA 2400, via the SDM. The Tunnel rises and when I test connectivity it shows as being successful, but I get an error stating: -.

  "

  A ping with the size of the data of this VPN interface size MTU and "do not fragment" bit set in the other end VPN device is a failure. This can happen if there is a lower MTU network which removes the packages "do not fragment". »

  From my reading, this should not cause any traffic to drop, right?

  Currently, I can't ping or telnet services from one end of the tunnel to the other. I was able to ping momentarily at the end of Sonicwall at one point, but this disappeared shortly after (without changing my about config).

  All ACLs created have been populated by the SDM.

  Should what troubleshooting steps I take?

  Reduce the MTU size on the interface of your router

  router (config)# interface type [slot_#/]     port_# router (config-if)# ip mtu MTU_size_in_bytes 

• Audio dropouts in streaming for magical flow device

  Hello

  I had a certain audio hang ups today.

  Check the journal of Unix, what is happening:

  26/05/2016 15:06:29.889 configd [52]: network modified: v4 (en0:192.168.0.4, en3 +:192.168.0.2) DNS * Proxy SMB

  to, I think, the same time as the break in the game.

  Has anyone else seen elsewhere? He is not related to hiring, occurs during playback of MP3 and FLAC.

  Looks like a problem with the network for me, however.

  I use an Airport express to keep WiFi (faster flow network).

  First of all, you did recently updated on your Mac or the AirPort Express? You use a VPN connection to the streaming source? Using Back to My Mac? Since you play files FLAC, I assume that you do not use iTunes as the audio server... correct?

  I recommend that you start troubleshooting cela by disabling the DNS cache on your MacBook Air with this command in Terminal:

  sudo dscacheutil-flushcache. sudo killall - HUP mDNSResponder

• Number of tunnel VPN LRT224

  Hello!

  I trying to get the LRT224 and need to understand something before you buy it:

  Manual user said it supports 50 VPN tunnels, but in the demo of the user Web interface, I can see PPTP 45 + 5 + 5 OpenVPN EasyLink - how these add up?

  In addition, these numbers limit the simultaneous number of tunnels or VPN accounts? For example can I have 10 accounts Easy Link (Open VPN) created and use only 3 of them at the same time, for example?

  Thank you very much!

  Hello, Amalakhov! These are the VPN router features:

  -50 via IPsec Site to Site tunnels
  -5 (compatible with OpenVPN) SSL tunnels
  -5 PPTP tunnels
  -IPsec 110 Mbps throughput
  -12 Mbps SSL throughput

  The maximum number of concurrent VPN connections through the router depends on the flow of IPSec. Your connection will be sacrificed if you would connect more than 5 tunnels at the same time.