Why the comment is considered ddl statement

Similar Questions

• Why the comment Panel keep appearing

  Hi, I created a form of an electronic document using LiveCycle, but now everytime I open the form in Acrobat keeps open the comments Panel. I can close or hide but appears when the form is loaded again. Thank you

  Frank

  HI -.

  Change the initial view for the file.

  Choose file > of Document properties and click the initial view tab. You will see that the notes pane shows as indicated by the behaviour of your document. Click on the drop down arrow and select Page only. Close the dialog box and save the document again. It should then open with just the displayed form.

  Donna.

• When reading newspapers on the Web sites, under the section comments, nothing appears. Why the comments do not appear on Firefox, appear on that?

  When I click on the link view comments on newspaper articles and online e, nothing is displayed. When I use Firefox at work or that you use Internet Explorer, comments are displayed under article.

  Hello mhburton313, you can try to reproduce this behavior when you start firefox in safe mode, once? If not, perhaps an addon intrudes here...

  Troubleshoot extensions, themes, and issues of hardware acceleration to resolve common problems of Firefox

• USB devices - why the comments show hosts materials integrated instead of a USB device?

  Whenever I click on the icon of the Guest Windows Savely remove the device, it displays only the hardware built-in to my host computer:

  But he has never really shows all connected peripheral USB!

  What I'm doing wrong here?

  If so, why it appears in the USB list anyway?

  See http://sanbarrow.com/workstation-faq.html#p6

  _________________________

  VMX-settings- WS FAQ -[MOAcd | http://sanbarrow.com/moa241.html]- VMDK-manual

• Why the same PDF allows to comment on Windows but not on Linux?

  All,

  I have a PDF document that (on version 9.5.1 Adobe Reader on Linux) has its file > properties... > Security > field commenting on the value "unauthorized."  However, I copied the same file on a Windows and Adobe Reader 10.1.3 machine to open.  On the Windows machine, the property of security even said this annotation is authorized.  Why the difference?  I would like to make comments on the Linux version, but it won't give me the tools to highlight or sticky notes.

  For what it's worth, all security properties (for example, 'Impression', 'Assembly of Document', '"content copying", etc.)  between the two copies of the PDF are identical.with with the exception of the property of 'comments '.

  Thanks for any help,

  -Steve Ross

  Thank you for your detailed review. In my opinion, your table supports my statement, and all is well. I stated (by the Readme) Reader X has been extended to allow the highlighting and sticky notes EVEN when a file is not extended.

  Thus, the Linux player, in version 9 and older than this change, should not for a default file display these tools. Since it cannot display these tools and no one else, poster correctly it is CORRECT to say his comments is not allowed.

  It seems to me that your table correctly records the difference between version 9 of the reader (Linux or Windows) and version X of the reader (not available for testing on Linux), except that nothing is wrong.

  It may not be what we want, but it's a whole different story.

• Why is there a commit implied before and after execution of DDL statements

  Hi guys,.
  
  Please let me know why he didn't is committed before and after the execution of DDL statements implied?
  
  
  Kind regards
  Sushmita

  Helyos wrote:
  This is because Oracle has the design like that.

  Come on Helyos, which is somewhat a weak response. :)

  The reason is that it is foolish to update the structure of the database, while there are some missing data updates that have not been committed.

  Imagine having a column VARCHAR2 (50), which currently has data of size up to 20 characters.
  Someone (person A) Decides that it would be useful to change the table and reduce the size of the varchar2 column (20) instead.
  Before they do, a third party (person B) inserted data that are 30 characters in size, but not yet committed it.
  In regard to person B is concerned and that the Insert succeeded as they don't got no error message, and they continue on through their process until they reach a suitable to commit point.
  Person that has and then tries to modify the database to make varchar2 (20).

  If the database has allowed that to happen then the column would be varchar2 (20) and the uncommitted data is more, even if the insertion was successful. When person B is going to know about it? It would be wrong to tell them when they try and commit, because their operations have succeeded, so why commit would fail.

  In this case, because it's two different people, then the database will recognize there are transactions that are uncommitted on the table and don't let anyone B change it.

  If it was just one person doing the two things in the same session, then the data would be automatically validated, the executed alter and the person has indicated that they can change the database because it is (now) data over the size that they want to.

  It makes perfect sense to have the database in a consistent state of data before changes are made, so why a commit is issued in advance.

  Here's something I wrote the other day on the subject...

  DOF delivers a validation before performing the actual action
  As long as the DOF is syntactically ok (the parser is happy with it), then the validation is issued, even if the actual DDL cannot be performed for another reason.

  For example...

  We have a table with data in there...

  SQL> create table xtest as select rownum rn from dual;
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> select * from xtest;
  
          RN
  ----------
           1
  

  We then delete the data but do not commit (demonstrated by the fact that we can roll it back)

  SQL> delete from xtest;
  
  1 row deleted.
  
  SQL> select * from xtest;
  
  no rows selected
  
  SQL> rollback;
  
  Rollback complete.
  
  SQL> select * from xtest;
  
          RN
  ----------
           1
  
  SQL> delete from xtest;
  
  1 row deleted.
  
  SQL> select * from xtest;
  
  no rows selected
  

  So now, our data are deleted, but not committed, what happens if we issue a DOF that is syntactically incorrect.

  SQL> alter tab xtest blah;
  alter tab xtest blah
        *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-00940: invalid ALTER command
  
  SQL> rollback;
  
  Rollback complete.
  
  SQL> select * from xtest;
  
          RN
  ----------
           1
  

  ... data can always be restored. This is because the parser was not happy with the syntax of the DDL statement.

  So let's delete the data again, without commit and deliver a DOF that is syntactically correct, but cannot run for another reason (i.e. the database object it refers to does not exist)...

  SQL> delete from xtest;
  
  1 row deleted.
  
  SQL> select * from xtest;
  
  no rows selected
  
  SQL> truncate table bob;
  truncate table bob
                 *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
  
  SQL> rollback;
  
  Rollback complete.
  
  SQL> select * from xtest;
  
  no rows selected
  

  So, there we have it. Just because the statement is syntactically correct, the deletion of the data has been committed, even if the DOF could not be performed.

  It makes sense really, because if we intend to amend the definition of the database where the data is stored, it cannot take place unless the database is in a State where the data is where it should be instead of being in limbo. For example, imagine the confusion if you update data on a column and then changed the data type of columns to be of a different size, for example reducing a column varchar2 50 characters up to 20 characters. If you had data that had just updated you to more than 20 characters whereas previously it was not, then the alter table command cannot not on this subject, which could alter the size of the column and then the data would be invalid to adapt while the update at the time did not fail.

  For example...

  We have a table that allows only 20 characters in a column. If we try to insert them more in this column, you get an error for our insert as planned...

  SQL> create table xtest (x varchar2(20));
  
  Table created.
  
  SQL> insert into xtest values ('012345678901234567890123456789');
  insert into xtest values ('012345678901234567890123456789')
                            *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-12899: value too large for column "SCOTT"."XTEST"."X" (actual: 30, maximum: 20)
  

  Now, if our table has allowed more character our insert statement are successful. As far as our 'application' is going to believe us, nay, we were told of the database, we have successfully introduced our data...

  SQL> alter table xtest modify (x varchar2(50));
  
  Table altered.
  
  SQL> insert into xtest values ('012345678901234567890123456789');
  
  1 row created.
  

  Now, if we tried to change our database column date back to 20 characters and it did not automatically the data beforehand then it would be happy to edit the column, but then when the data has been committed he wasn't. However the database has already told us that the data were inserted, so he can't go back to that now.

  Instead, we can see that the data be engaged first because the alter command returns an error telling us that the table data is too large, and also can not restore the insertion after the alter attempt...

  SQL> alter table xtest modify (x varchar2(20));
  alter table xtest modify (x varchar2(20))
                            *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-01441: cannot decrease column length because some value is too big
  
  SQL> rollback;
  
  Rollback complete.
  
  SQL> select * from xtest;
  
  X
  --------------------------------------------------
  012345678901234567890123456789
  
  SQL>
  

  Of course, being a statement commit to the existing session, if we had tried to modify the column of the table to another session would have got us

  SQL> alter table xtest modify (x varchar2(20));
  alter table xtest modify (x varchar2(20))
  *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-00054: resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified
  
  SQL>
  

  ... which is basically saying that we cannot change the table because someone else uses it and they did not commit their data still.

  Once the other session committed data, we obtain the expected error...

  ORA-01441: cannot decrease column length because some value is too big
  

  Hope that explains it

• Why did I lose the buttons in the comments to the newspaper in Firefox, but not in Google Chrome

  I read the Huffington Post from time to time and you want to comment on some articles. Each comment in Google Chrome has three buttons at the bottom and select either:
  Response
  Favorite
  Flag of abusive

  Now, if I have access to the site ( http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/) via Firefox, there is only the opportunity to respond to the comment. Why is this, is this something to do with Adblock that I activated and find it really useful.

  Thank you.

• I would like to know why my name is not appearing when I make a comment on the page RSS, my dose of name not appear in the comment box, and the comment I made disapered, why?

  When I try to comment on a story on Facebook, my dose of name doesn't show in the comment box, then my comment disapers, why is this?

  Hello

  Check with Facebook help and Support and their Forums.

  Facebook - help and Support
  http://www.Facebook.com/help.php

  Facebook - Facebook Contact and support of Facebook
  http://www.Facebook.com/help/?page=835

  Facebook - Forums
  http://getsatisfaction.com/Facebook

  I hope this helps.

  Rob Brown - Microsoft MVP<- profile="" -="" windows="" expert="" -="" consumer="" :="" bicycle=""><- mark="" twain="" said="" it="">

• Executes the DDL statement via ksh script

  I need execute a DDL statement (for example, ALTER USER) using ksh script and capture the result to be able to verify whether the statement succeeded or failed.

  I wrote a script below:

  SQL = "test ALTER USER...;"

  If sqlplus / as sysdba < < EOF > $MYFILE

  whernever sqlerror exit 1 rollback

  $sql

  commit;

  "exit";

  EXPRESSIONS OF FOLKLORE

  When I run the above script, I get 'modified by the user.  Commit complete. "written in a file.

  Is there an easy way to check the contents of the file for the result to a variable instead of an output file or program to see if the ALTER USER statement was successful?

  There is no need to check the contents of the file, just check for the error in your shell script.  Something like:

  Oracle > cat t.sh
  Export ORALCE_SID = dev2
  SQL = "select 1/0 from dual;"
  sqlplus-s / t.log
  whenever sqlerror exit 1
  $sql
  output
  EXPRESSIONS OF FOLKLORE
  If [$?-no 0]; then
  echo "an error has occurred."
  FI

  Oracle >. t.sh
  An error has occurred

  John

• Why can't I change a comment in the comment column?

  Well, I have a document. Fine. In this paper, I used the comment function. It works very well. I see the left hand the document with my comments and the right hand the list of comments. Fine. Now, I want to change a comment.

  Why can't I change a comment in the comment (the list) column to change completely? In the document, I don't see the changes! Clicking in the comment in the document, it looks like changed in the list of comments. When I then click somewhere else, it changes back and looks like he did before.

  So: What's the problem? (I used the comment text field).

  IhateAccounts wrote:

  ...

  When I click on the frame (box), it is marked. Changing the size of the block of text new text will appear. But why is not immediately, when I change the text of the comment in the list?

  This is a bug.

• Why using the typewriter in acrobat 9 adds less file size that the use of the text of the comment in acrobat 11 tool?

  Why using the typewriter in acrobat 9 adds less file size that the use of the text of the comment in acrobat 11 tool?

  Two employees, one using acrobat 9 and the other uses acrobat 11. The two employees open a secure document one page 105 KB in size. Used using acrobat 9 using the typewriter tool to add comments. Document increases in volume to 137 kb. Second employee using acrobat 11 uses the comment add the text tool (since it is no longer a typewriter tool). This employee has to use tool once and the document immediately increases size of 105 k to 950 + kb. Why is this? What can be done to avoid this?

  As I suspected much earlier, the difference is in the fonts that are used for the text. For the smaller file, text annotation font is Times Roman. that is a policy that is essentially built into Acrobat/Reader. For the larger file, the font is Tahoma, which is not an integrated police force, which ends by happens so the entire police gets embedded in the PDF file. The size of this font on disk file is 681KO on my system (Mac), and it ends up taking more space when they are embedded in the PDF file. The same type of thing happens with form fields and this is done so that all characters in the font are available when the text is changed in a system that may not have the installed font.

  One of the problems is if you try to reduce the size of the file by changing the font that used up one of the built-in ones (Courier, Helvetica, TImes Roman), Acrobat does not remove the now unused of the file font information, if you do not get the reduction in file size that you can imagine, even if the font is no longer presented as being incorporated. I submitted this as a bug some time ago, but it has not been fixed.

• Why the specification of package in the INVALID state

  Hi all
  Why spec package goes to the State not valid when I change a procedure that is called in the Package body
  and why the package body is always in a VALID State. Can someone please clarify my doubt.

  May be that the specification had errors and not the package.

  Can be one of the constants / variables declared in the specification of the package has bad reference

  like var1 tab1.col1%type who doesnexists of column...

  OR

  V number (1): = 10;

  or

  a bad closing / end a procedure...

• Why the error message is created, and the statement may not run properly?

  Why the error message is created, and the statement may not run properly?
  

  SQL> select sql_handle, plan_name, creator from dba_sql_plan_baselines where 
  sql_text='select*from hr.jobs where min_salary>10000';
  select sql_handle,plan_name,creator from dba_sql_plan_baselines 
  where sql_text='select*from hr.jobs where min_salary>10000'
                                                                        *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected - got CLOB

  It is true that it is the problem of syntax. Change the increased as follows, the increased can run successfully:

  SQL> select sql_handle,plan_name,creator from dba_sql_plan_baselines where sql_text
  like 'select*from hr.jobs where min_salary>10000';
  

  Edited by: jetq may 3, 2010 19:26

• Why the following statement is not successful?

  This statement is executed successfully.

  SQL> select to_char(sysdate+1/24,'yymmddhh24') from dual;
  
  TO_CHAR(
  --------
  09081510

  Why the following statement is not successful?

  SQL> select to_char(to_date(to_char(sysdate+1/24,'yymmddhh24'))) from dual;
  select to_char(to_date(to_char(sysdate+1/24,'yymmddhh24'))) from dual
                         *
  ERROR at line 1:
  ORA-01861: literal does not match format string

  You can be enlightened by this script.

  SQL> declare
   v_date date;
   begin
   select to_date(''||to_char(sysdate+1/24,'yymmddhh24')||'','yymmddhh24') into v_date from dual;
   dbms_output.put_line(to_char(v_date));
   end;
   /  2    3    4    5    6    7
  15-AUG-09
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  

• Why Google + comments will work for me in private browsing mode, but not in the regular navigation?

  For some reason, I can't respond to any comment of Google Plus on any Google service when Firefox is in normal browse mode. However, I can answer all the comments from Google over YouTube and Google more in private browsing mode. Google Plus comments work as well in Chrome. I can post a comment in all browsers in all modes, but I can't answer or mark as spam any comment of Google Plus in Firefox, when it is not in private browsing mode.

  Boot safe mode works. Can I disable my modules one by one to see what is responsible?