WILL using a VPN configuration

A quite simple question here, but I can't verify this with the documentation:

A VPN concentrator can be configured as a Grateful breakpoint when you run a Contract by the IPSec LAN-to-LAN tunnel? If so, please provide an example.

Thanks in advance for your answer.

Sean

I don't think that it is possible to configure a VPN concentrator as a GRE endpoint.

HTH

Rick

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • Will there be improvements made to the features of VPN configuration and firewalls in the ACC?

    Future versions of CCA will have the ability to set up the VPN site-to site on UC520s, UC540s and SR520s without having to use the Multisite Manager or CLI? With non-SBCS Cisco VPN products have a Cisco's GUI to configure site-to-site VPNs. The UC520, UC540 and SR520 are the only Cisco products (with the exception of products that have reached end of life status) who do not have this capability in a sort of Cisco's GUI (apart from the Multisite Manager of CCA 2.1 and later versions).

    Future versions of CCA will allow you to modify the firewall on UC520s, UC540s and SR520s rules without having to resort to the CLI?

    Almost all Cisco products, except for UC520, UC540 and SR520 series products, have a Cisco's GUI to configure these features. The SA520 and SA540, these features can be configured in the web GUI. The Cisco ISR, these features can be configured through SDM or CCP. CCA has always had the ability to fix UC520 unit, but he had not the possibility to fine-tune the settings of firewall and security, unlike the web interface SA500, SDM or CCP.

    Reasons why having the skills to the CCA is important:

    • These characteristics are indicated on the data of UC520, UC540 and SR520 sheets
    • The opportunity to refine and verify access control lists in the ACC can accomplish the following:
      • Ability to comply with HIPAA, Sarbanes-Oxley, PCI, etc.
      • Improved troubleshooting
      • Eliminates the need to use CLI to refine or verify the firewall settings
    • VPN site to site can currently be configured via CLI or the CCA Multisite Manager
    • Multisite Manager CCA can be used for virtual private networks between UC500 or SR520s placed in front of UC500 units units
    • CCA Multisite Manager cannot be used for VPN between autonomous SR520 units, or between a unit UC500 and endpoint non-UC500 (with the exception of a placed in front of a UC500 unit SR520)
    • All images IOS Supportepar UC520 units, UC540 and SR520 routers have firewalls and VPN capabilities described here

    Hi John,.

    The ACC is a configuration tool for platforms that are part of the SBCS solutions. Multisite manager is the approach we take to configure a VPN site. Enchancements in customization of the firewall and access lists is something we plan to put on the roadmap. We will continue to improve the CCA to meet these requirements. We will schedule to get these features added in the 2010 calendar.

    Thank you

    Saurabh

  • Impossible to establish a VPN connection with a router configured as a Cisco server using client VPN 5.0.00.0340

    Hei guys,.

    Please help me on this one because I'm stuck enough on her...

    I am trying to connect to a Cisco 3700 router configured as a VPN server by using a VPN client and the VPN connection does not settle.

    This is an extract from the log:

    130 12:48:30.585 07/01/11 Sev = Info/5 IKE / 0 x 63000001
    Peer supports XAUTH
    131 12:48:30.585 07/01/11 Sev = WARNING/3 IKE/0xE3000057
    The HASH payload received cannot be verified
    132 12:48:30.600 07/01/11 Sev = WARNING/2 IKE/0xE300007E
    Failed the hash check... may be configured with password invalid group.
    133 12:48:30.600 07/01/11 Sev = WARNING/2 IKE/0xE300009B
    Impossible to authenticate peers (Navigator: 904)
    134 12:48:30.600 07/01/11 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013
    SEND to > ISAKMP OAK INFO (NOTIFY: INVALID_HASH_INFO) for 200.100.50.173

    I enclose the whole journal extract... The message "BOLD" is quite obvious, you mean, but I'm 100% sure, in the login entry, I typed correctly the group password: pass

    My topology is very basic, as I am setting this up only to get a clue of the operation of the Cisco VPN. It is built in GNS3:
    -2 3700 routers: one of them holds the configuration of the VPN server and the other would be the ISP through which the remote worker would try to establish a VPN connection. I am also attaching the configuration file for the router configured as a VPN router.

    Behind the second router there is a virtual XP machine on which I have installed VPN client...

    My connection entry in the customer is to have the following parameters:
    Host: 200.100.50.173 , //which is the IP address of the VPNServer
    Authentication-> authentication-> name group: grup1 password: pass / / I'm quite positive that I typed the correct password... even if the log messages are linked to a misidentification.

    I use public addresses only, because I noticed there is a question about behind the NAT VPN connections and is not not very familiar to the NAT.

    Another aspect which can be of any importance is that "allow Tunneling of Transport" in the tab Transport to the input connection is disabled

    and the VPNServer router logs the following error message when you try to establish the connection:

    * 01:08:47.147 Mar 1: % CRYPTO-6-IKMP_NOT_ENCRYPTED: IKE 200.100.50.34 package was not encrypted and it should have been.
    * 01:08:47.151 Mar 1: % CRYPTO-6-IKMP_NOT_ENCRYPTED: IKE 200.100.50.34 package was not encrypted and it should have been.

    You have no idea why I can't connect? Y at - it something wrong with my configuration of VPN server... or with the connection entry in the VPN client?

    Thank you

    Iulia

    Depending on the configuration of the router, the group name is grup1 and the password is baby.

    You also lack the ipsec processing game that you would need to apply to the dynamic map.

    Here is an example configuration for your reference:

    http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk583/TK372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080235197.shtml

    Hope that helps.

  • If I update my iOS to 10, it will be hase vpn pptp type?

    If I update my iOS to 10, it will be hase vpn pptp type?

    PPTP is no longer used. Replace your VPN L2TP configuration.

  • New ASA/VPN configuration

    So, I am looking to add one of my spare 5510 firewall to my secondary network as a vpn connection.

    All I want this new ASA to do is handle my site anyconnect VPN connections.  I'm pretty new to ASAs if any help would be great.  I know how to create a new access VPN on my ASA and I added a NAT for my inside and outside traffic to my new Pool of IP VPN.

    My question is, since it's only for the VPN and I want all my current internal traffic to continue to the asa 5510 existing routing, do I have to enter the ACL to my new single AAS of VPN?  ACLs are used for VPN traffic and do I need them to traffic the route via VPN?

    I'll put up inside interface of connection to one of my main Cisco switches and the outside interface connects to my DMZ switch on the new ASA only VPN.

    Thank you

    I don't know if I am how you connect to the external interface of single ASA VPN. Normally, in this type of installation, we would see the ASA VPN "in parallel" with the perimeter firewall.

    You mention the DMZ switch that threw me a little. If you are in France through your main firewall and go to single ASA VPN via the DMZ then Yes you will need to allow several open ports (protocol 50, udp/500, tcp/443 among others) and may have to do some other techniques (NAT - T, etc.) depending on the type of remote you are implementing. That's why we rarely see this configuration used - it adds a good dose of complexity without significant benefit.

    When the old facility is used, you need to switch internal to know to route traffic to the pool VPN through the only ASA VPN inside the interface. A static route is more often used, although you can use OSPF or EIGRP if you wanted to.

    Should generally not be any access list that VPN traffic around the Bank access lists incoming interface. Back to remote clients traffic is coming from inside and out through (and is usually part of anestablished connection) so no access list is necessary inside.

  • Lost the VPN tunnel between 2 site when internal client using client vpn

    We currently have VPN tunnel connected to the remote desktop using router VPN Hotbrick 2.

    When 1 of the internal computer try to connect to another server VPN customer using Cisco VPN Client v4.8, she will appear in drop/disable/loss of the tunnel between us VPN and remote offices. The tunnel is still established but no traffice between site 2. (cannot all ping)

    What are the causes of the problem? Hotbrik problem? Customer Cisco VPN setting or something else?

    I don't know what causes the problem. Help, please. Thanks in advance.

    Hello

    The problem is that your NAT device will not translating properly, and when the 2nd customer triggers (ISAKMP packets-UDP 500) connections port isn't transalated, so for the SAA is as the first user tries to connect again, then it rejects the initial connection.

    The trick is, as you have discovered, use global UDP.

    The problem is that UDP 10000 is not a standard, so you need to check if multiple users can be connected at the same time behind the same NAT device.

    If this is not the case, use the NAT transparency standard industry (UDP 4500). This should be configured only on the SAA.

    Please rate if this helped.

    Kind regards

    Daniel

  • Unlikely VPN configuration

    Hello

    one of our partners, had asked us a strange VPN configuration. I'm not a specialist of the ASA and I want to assure you that it is really impossible.

    We already have a VPN tunnel to the TOP. For example:

    Peer1: 1.1.1.1/32 (my company)

    Peer2: 2.2.2.2/32 (partner)

    EncryptionDomain1: 10.10.10.10/32 (our field of encryption)

    EncryptionDomain2: 20.20.20.20/24 (field of the partner encryption)

    Thus, the partner we asked to install a second tunnel with exactly the same configuration. (Homologous domain and encryptio).

    I don't think it is possible, for the reason of the match seemingly obvious to access list. In this way, I think that the ASA will get confused on which traffic corresponds to which access to the tunnel to the circulation list. It's quite a superposition of access list.

    Am I wrong?

    There might be an ASA feature that makes this possible?

    Best regards

    Fabiano Martins

    Hi, Fabiano,.

    As you rightly pointed out, it is not possible to create 2 tunnels for the same source and destination, between the same two peers.

    As a single card encryption can be applied to an interface, the different tunnels that put an end to this topic are configured with line numbers.

    When traffic is matched with the card encryption, for that, a descendant of the correspondence. And when two tunnels with the same crypto-list access are configured, then always match the first condition in the card encryption, and so the second tunnel will never come to the top.

    The most interesting question here would be, as to why your client wishes to set up such a facility.

    He may be trying to achieve something that can be done without the need for the two tunnels.

    -Shrikant

    P.S.: Please check the question as answered, if it has been resolved. Note the useful messages. Thank you.

  • Can I use two vpn set in my iPhone?

    Can I use two vpn set in my iPhone?

    Yes, you can use but not at the same time. You can add more than one vpn on your iPhone but can only use one at a time. Another way to use the two VPN at the same time, is that you can have an extra router to connect the two VPN at the same time. For more information on this, you can take a look at these answers https://www.quora.com/Why-cant-I-use-two-VPN-at-the-same-time hope this will solve your problem to his subject.

  • VPN configuration blocking Internet connectivity

    I own an iPhone6 (bought in November 14 and another iPad4 (bought in early 2014) - I face a problem even in both devices.)

    Whenever I'm trying to be devices connecting to the Internet (this either through Mobile or wireless data, I have to take concrete steps to start-up the VPN setting without which the device connect to the Internet. However sometimes (although not very often) the VPN configuration gets turned on by itself without manual intervention (on start-up or mobile data or WiFi on the device). So there is always some delay time in the connection to the Internet whenever I want to use the device.

    I would be grateful for suggestions from the community in order to overcome the problem.

    You have installed VPN software or you have configured in your VPN settings? If you have a VPN configuration, then check its configuration. If you do not have a VPN configuration or a VPN software installed, then the VPN switch in settings should not illuminate.

  • Issues with Dell desktop computer wireless and D-Link wireless network card. Only able to get wireless access by checking "Use Windows to configure my wireless network". This kind of file sharing impossible.

    original title: can't see the computer on wireless internet!

    I hope that's not too much detail, but I would like that the sequence of events to be clear...

    I have a Dell desktop computer that's probably six or seven years now.  It did not come with a wireless card, so I bought a DLink router and combo card wireless, install both with the DLink software.  It works beautifully.

    Later, we through my rep AT & T DSL, I got a Motorola modem/router with wireless capabilities.  I had plugged directly on my computer Dell desktop and moved to a Dell laptop DLink wireless receiver.  No problems.

    The Dell laptop is dead and the DLink receiver has not been used for a long time.  Family of my daughter moved to our place, and I have connected his desktop computers and laptop to wireless internet, using the Windows Connection Wizard.  Still no problem.

    I got a new ASUS laptop, I also linked using the Windows Wizard.  STILL no problem.

    Now, here's the problem comes.  I moved the Dell desktop computer, connected the DLink wireless receiver to it and I am able to get wireless access ONLY when I go into the properties of PC, click the wireless networks tab and check the "use Windows to configure my wireless network" box.  Then I can connect correctly, but I don't see this computer on my wireless network.  Bad luck... because I want to be able to access share files.  When I try to connect using different assistants of Windows, I get a message to the effect that, if I used another software to connect to the program, I can't use the Windows Wizard.

    So, what can I do to remove the original configuration of DLink completely and to connect to my wireless network using the wizards in Windows?  I uninstalled the software of DLink, but it seems to have no effect at all.

    BTW, Dell desktop computer is running XP, office computer of my daughter is running VISTA, and two laptops are equipped with Windows 7.  I can see all the computers on the network with the exception of the original Dell desktop computer wireless.

    Any help would be appreciated!

    Hi Joe and DonnaLoth,

    The network will have to be changed to allow the computer Windows XP join a workgroup.

    How to change a computer name, join a domain, and add a computer description in Windows XP or Windows Server 2003

    You can also read the following article.

    Networking of computers running different versions of Windows

  • How to use the automatic configuration wizard and where can I FIND?

    How to use the automatic configuration wizard and where can I FIND?

    Hi TannySmedt,

    To activate the Configuration service automatic wireless so it starts automatically, click the Start button. Select settings , then select Control Panel. If you use Windows XP display, select the performance and Maintenance category, and then select Administrative Tools. If you use Classic view, and then select Administrative Tools. In the left pane, click the Services icon. Click the automatic Wireless Configuration icon in the right pane, and change the box Startup Type to Automatic. This parameter will be defined the service starts automatically at boot time. Then click on the Start button to start the automatic Wireless Configuration service zero wireless and click on the OK button.

    The automatic Wireless Configuration can also be started and stopped from a command prompt. To start the automatic Wireless Configuration, run the following command:

    net start wzcsvc

    To stop the automatic Wireless Configuration, run the following command:

    net stop wzcsvc

  • Should I change ip of the router if I use the vpn - RV110W

    Hello:

    My RV110W ip address is 192.168.1.2. Now, I add a line to vpn clinet adjustment table. When I put the button Save page displays "to ensure the functionality.the good router need to change its ip address to 10.x.x.1. So. I need to know should I change ip of the router 10.x.x.1 order to use the VPN? It is very embarrassing because my devices are all set to the range of 192.168.1.x.

    Hello

    I'm sorry that you're having problems with your device.

    You are right, the router will force you to change the IP address when you try to date a new VPN user, if he always uses the IP address 192.168.1.X, in order to avoid problems when people connect remotely like this subnet is the most used, and if someone tries to connect remotely by using the 192.168.1.X subnet, then the connection will be rejected.

    Now, you don't really have to change if you don't want (I have no advice as the function is there for a reason and most likely you will have problems with the connection of users on the same subnet).

    What you can do is change the IP address that you want, create all VPN users and then change the IP address to you, this way you fool the router and you can keep your current IP address (even once, this is not recommended)

    I hope that was helpful, please let us know help.

  • VPN configuration

    in a firewall with multiple VPN connections, it is recommended to use the VPN Wizard in ASDM to configure VPN connections or use VPN section under Setup in the additional ASDM?

    which is better?

    Under Setup > remote access VPN (or VPN Site to Site as the case may be).

    I recommend that, because you have total control over the details (unlike the wizard that exposes only a subset of the options available).

  • Using Cisco VPN with desktop remotely

    Hi, I work with many customers that use Cisco VPN for remote access.  Unfortunately the Cisco VPN does not work well with my VPN IBM client so I can't have both running on my computer.  So, I thought that I would like to install the Cisco VPN on an old machine, connect to this computer via desktop to distance and VPN in the network from the customer via the VPN.

    Well, who does not work either.  As soon as I connect to the network via the VPN Remote Desktop client loses the connection.  Can someone tell me if it works as designed (WAD) or if there is a secret of configuration to operate?

    Thanks in advance...

    John,

    When you connect via VPN to the network client on the remote computer, the connection RD proper case?

    I think it's because the VPN connection that you have drawn on the client computer is configured to encrypt all traffic, and that's why the RD connection to your computer of the drops.

    You can do a quick test... on the VPN client computer under statististics (VPN software) verification and check if secure roads is 0.0.0.0 (no split tunneling).

    If Yes... and if having access to the VPN server, which can be changed.

    Federico.

  • IP address connection sets using the VPN Client

    Hello world. I'm using a VPN Client when I establish a VPN Tunnel with a 1600 router, and I have a question.

    Can I assign a fixed IP address in the client, instead the router send to random addresses from customer?

    What I would he do this?

    It would be in the configuration of the VPN client, or in the configuration of the router?

    If so, I'm doing this?

    Do I need another tool, or other software or hardware to do?

    any help is hope...

    Thank you...

    Hello

    I don't think that there is a simple way to do this.

    However, if you create a different groupname for the user who needs a static IP address, I think you should be good to go

    So what you need to do, create a new pool of addresses. Make the start and end ip address be the same (this is the address to which you want to assign to the VPN user)

    Configure another ipsec on the router group and bind the new pool to this group

    Ask your VPN client to connect to this group

    Hope that helps

    Jean Marc

Maybe you are looking for