WRT320N security hole

WRT320N, if I disable "security/firewall/filter anonymous Internet requests", the web administration utility is accessible without any filtering via Internet (HTTP, HTTPS, or port 80, 443), he is indifferent, SPI firewall is activated at the same time. I need to uncheck "Filter anonymous Internet requests" because I am following up on the side of WAN network health with ICMP and otherwise the router does not meet the ICMP requests. The router has the latest firmware available installed.

I'we checked a very simple attack against the web utility open, and after a few hundred telnet on port 443 open blocking the web server integrated on the router, it doesn't matter if I do the authentication or not (brute force).

It is a security hole huge wery. Do anyone have a work around for this problem?

Pls help.

Okay, meanwhile helpdesk said, that this router is unable to filter malicious access on wan, it is not possible to allow ping and restrict access to the interface of administration at the same time, and they said I have to by another more expensive.

Tags: Linksys Routers

Similar Questions

  • Security hole warning won't go away

    Update on shutdown hit last night

    This morning security hole scan shows

    used my normal software (CSA/IOrbit) to clean, but did not work - shows always the security hole.

    Posted the ASC > IOrbit forum and was told to do the following:

    This update to the Microsoft security patch is released to the public yesterday to protect Windows users from hackers attack and encoding remotely PC using the icon loading vulnerability shortcuts.

    I advise you to use the automatic Windows Update or the manual update, that same Windows 7 OSs must restart during installation.

    Automatic Update:
    http://update.Microsoft.com/microsoftupdate/

    Manual installation:
    XP 32 bit:
    http://www.Microsoft.com/downloads/d...b-90f2727894fd

    Vista 32 bit:
    http://www.Microsoft.com/downloads/d...d-f64db229ee66

    Windows7 32 bit:
    http://www.Microsoft.com/downloads/d...a-8bd2d70d0a0a

    Most likely your update could not be completed as it should, and that's why security hole IS360 warns.

    It is a critical vulnerability, and I believe that after the installation correctly, IS360 not will warn you that more.

    I tried suggestions - here's what happened:

    (1) manual - he said that it does not apply to your computer.

    Automatic updated 2), this is the answer I get: the site has encountered a problem and cannot display the page you are trying to view. The options provided below may help you solve the problem.

    Can someone tell me the problem. I was at this for hours. Thank you

    Only one 1 antivirus should be installed & loading at startup. You had two installed for almost a year (i.e., IOBit & MSE and before that, IOBit and OneCare, judging by your last response).

    But it's not really important because you did not have any antivirus application installed by your own admission, at least 4 months: your computer is infected and has been for some time. See...

    Cleaning a compromised system
         http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc700813.aspx

    Personal data backup (which none should be considered 100% reliable at this point) then format the HARD disk and do a clean install of Windows. Please note that a repair installation (upgrade AKA on-site) will NOT fix it!

    HOW to do a clean install of Vista: section "If you want to reinstall Windows Vista by running a new installation...". "ofhttp://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-vista/Installing-and-reinstalling-Windows-Vista

    Once installed the clean, you will have the equivalent of a "new computer" in order to take care of everything on the next page before connecting the machine to the internet or one local network (i.e. other computers) otherwise and before connecting a flash drive, card SD or any other external disk to the computer:

    4 steps to help protect your new computer before going online
         http://www.Microsoft.com/security/pypc.aspx

    Tip: After completing the computer fully patched, download/install KB971029 manually before connecting any player external to the computer:http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971029

    NB: The free McAfee trial will be reinstalled (but invalid) when Windows is reinstalled. You MUST uninstall the trial for free AND download/run theMcAfee Consumer products removal tool before installing updates, Windows Service Packs or IE upgrades AND BEFORE installing your new anti-virus application.

    See also:

    Risks & benefits of P2P file sharing
    http://www.Microsoft.com/protect/data/downloadfileshare/filesharing.aspx
    http://blogs.technet.com/MMPC/archive/2008/10/06/the-cost-of-free-software.aspx

    Measures to help prevent spyware
    http://www.Microsoft.com/security/spyware/prevent.aspx

    Measures to help prevent computer worms
    http://www.Microsoft.com/security/worms/prevent.aspx

    Avoid fake security software!
    http://www.Microsoft.com/security/antivirus/rogue.aspx

    If you need help, please start a new thread in this forum: http://social.answers.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/vistarepair/threads

    If these procedures look too complex - and there is no shame in admitting this isn't your cup of tea - take the machine to a local, good reputation and stand-alone computer (that is, not BigBoxStoreUSA or Geek Squad) repair facility.

    Good luck!

    ~ Robear Dyer (PA Bear) ~ MS MVP (that is to say, mail, security, Windows & Update Services) since 2002 ~ WARNING: MS MVPs represent or work for Microsoft

  • Why the Adobe reader 9 can not skip to 11, and I see adobe 9.5.5 is more recent and FINAL release, so that if this final version has security hole, you won't fix it? Thank you!

    I want to improve my adobe 9 to 11, but why it cannot be upgraded directly, the second question is since adobe 9.5.5 is more recent and FINAL output, so if this final release has security hole, adobe will not solve it? Thank you very much!

    You are right. This isn't how it's done.  Upgrades are usually in this way, complete news, not a change to the existing product.

  • Using google DNS servers creates a security hole?

    Hello

    So I had slight problems with browsing the internet. Although it is not so frequent, sometimes I can not open sites and I encounter the message "safari could not find server'. Therefore, I thought that by using the dns servers of Google (8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4) could help with that. However, I wonder if using a public dns server instead of the ISP can harm to the security of my camera somehow.

    Thanks in advance

    Do not be afraid.

  • How to install the patch for the security hole last QT process running on a Dell with Windows 7 (Windows 10 upgrade) laptop? I got a message from my program called Belarc that the patch is missing on this device. Thank you

    How to install the patch for QuickTime Pro for Windows 7 on a Dell laptop... I got an alert through a program which I run from time to time (Belarc) and it says that there was a security breach detected by Apple (or one of its vendors, who manages the security of the operating system such as Cisco) during December 2015.

    Please notify.  Thanks in advance for your guidance pertaining to my question.

    Download QuickTime for Windows - Apple 7.7.9

    Apple ends development of QuickTime Player 7 for Mac and Windows operating system, so don't expect much more beyond this last version.

    The installation shows are supported for Windows 7 and lower, so I don't know what to expect on Windows 10.

  • What has been the recent initial risk security involving Javascript in Firefox?

    What has been the recent initial risk security involving Javascript in Firefox? I downloaded the suggested "No Script" to be able to allow or forbid scripts on Web sites. However, it gets a little frustrating when waiting for pages to download, then realize that I have to enable them. I really need to make it longer?

    JavaScript is not any security risk known that have not been resolved in recent versions of Firefox. You are thinking maybe Java, which is full of known security holes and should be turned off, but is not related to the Javascript in any way.

  • Recommendation of Firefox for security

    Email from Firefox recommends measures for safety... but when I try to know the recommendations, I get a popup that says page Mozilla isn't sure, so I can't display the recommendations

    First of all, you need to update Firefox 16.0.2, the version you are using of many known security holes, to stay safe please update as soon as POSSIBLE. Update Firefox to the latest version

    Then, what page you look at which gives you this message?

  • [Security breach] Windows Live ID is locked because of the bug from Microsoft Store.

    I had to create a new Windows Live ID for this question.  I have a Windows Live ID that has been locked by Microsoft's Store due to a failure of the purchase.  The account still clearly exists but is in a weird state of limbo: I can't create an account with the same email address, nor can I recover my password as it says the account does not exist.  I've written before, connection systems and this indicates that there is a flag on my Windows Live ID account that locked.  I have a number of critical Microsoft online services associated with this account, so I want to.  I also know it's Microsoft Store which caused this problem because I was able to log in and use my right to live account until the Microsoft Store transaction failed.

    Support of Microsoft Store staff are unable to help me.  I tried to get my Windows Live ID unlocked several times.  "It is not my job" mentality prevails.  It's their job.  Their system caused the problem, they should be eager to fix it as soon as POSSIBLE.

    The Microsoft Security Response center said it is not a security hole and can't be fixed.  I say that it is a security problem: a purchase that failed in the Microsoft Store where pending it (waiting transaction) succeeds but the transaction authorization fails results in any direct account associated with the email address used for the purchase being locked.  A hacker could use a set of known and prestigious real accounts with a bunch of stolen credit cards and they could block these accounts - put these people in the same boat as me.

    There is no human contact available for honest-to-goodness Windows Live ID Single Sign-On (SSO) questions - the only "solution" Microsoft must direct me to the password recovery page, which does not help because the account is locked and not simply a forgotten password.

    This problem lasts for a month and I'm tired of going round in circles.  Help!

    Have you tried Windows Live Solution Center?

    http://www.windowslivehelp.com/product.aspx?ProductID=10

    I think that if you post in the Forum here, they will follow up with you.

    Hope that helps
    Matt

  • Security 2729450 KB

    KB2729450 load, but the Update icon is always in the system tray, etc.. XP Home Edition, SP3.

    A sweep of Belarc Advisor displays the file (KB 2729450) unprotected with this message: (an unlocked lock) "marks a security hotfix that fails verification (a security hole).

    I uninstalled KB 2729450 and, in closing, I click on "do not install update".  Yes, the icon is still there!

    What is the solution?

    Hi Hangingonbymyfingers,

    Thanks for posting in Microsoft Communities. Provide the following information:

    ·         Did you do changes on the computer before the show?

    ·         The update is successfully installed?

    ·         The question is limited to this update (KB 2729450)?

    Follow these methods and try to install the update.

    Method 1: Temporarily disable the security software.

    Note: Antivirus software can help protect your computer against viruses and other security threats. In most cases, you should not disable your antivirus software. If you do not disable temporarily to install other software, you must reactivate as soon as you are finished. If you are connected to the Internet or a network during the time that your antivirus software is disabled, your computer is vulnerable to attacks.

    Method 2: Put the computer in a clean bootState to see if there is a software conflict as the clean boot helps eliminate software conflicts.

    Note: After completing the steps in the clean boot troubleshooting, follow the section How to configure Windows to use a Normal startup state from the link to start the computer to a Normal startupmode.

    After the clean boot used to resolve the problem, you can follow these steps to configure Windows XP to start normally.

    (a) click Start, run.

    (b) type msconfigand click OK.

    (c) the System Configuration Utility dialog box appears.

    (d) click the general tab, click Normal startup - load all services and device drivers and then click OK.

    (e) when you are prompted, click restart to restart the computer.

    Method 3: You can also manually install updates (KB number) by downloading from the Microsoft Download Center.

    http://www.Microsoft.com/downloads/en/default.aspx

    Method 4: Follow the steps in the article.

    How to reset the Windows Update components?

    I hope this helps. Let us know if you need more assistance.

    Thank you.

  • Service packs, security updates, and the performance of the PC

    First turn off let me say that I am certainly NOT too computer savvy... I know my way around, but do not know what things to say or do... That being said... My computer runs very slowly, even though I have downloaded MSE, clean space disk and Defrag... I was looking on my installed programs, and I have SO MANY service packs and security updates! (1) how security updates day and service packs? (2) they occupy space and make my computer run slower? (3) is it OK to delete the service packs and security updates

    1 - security patches close security holes that have been found or improve security in some way. Service Packs are large infrequent updates that contain a selection of 'wound' of many previous updates as well as adding features/features additional.

    2 & 3 - Microsoft/Windows updates take little space, but not a huge amount. However, given their importance and usefulness, I highly recommend that you leave alone, and then assign windows Update automatic recommended settings. If you start to remove the updates in a timely manner without the necessary expertise you can cause you problems.

    Even if you say that you've defragmented & used cleaning disc, there are a few other things to look at in this article:

    http://www.microsoft.com/atwork/maintenance/speed.aspx .

  • A procedure for security (false?), I did changed my desktop icons for the default system icon

    I have 64-bit Windows Vista Ultimate on a HP laptop.

    I read a review (whose source I can't remember, but I think this is Microsoft) that there is a security hole in the desktop icons that would attack at a distance.  (Yes, I know.)  So he gave a procedure to remove the danger with editing the registry, with the warning that it would make the normal icons disappear and be replaced by the default system icon.

    I performed the procedure and the icons have disappeared.  And I did not back up the registry first.  (Yes, I know.)

    Now, I know I don't want to live with all the icons, the same.  I have read many procedures on Windows 7, etc., but none that hits home.  And try the remedies to these problems is no help either.  Can anyone help?  Thank you very much.

    After three weeks of research, I posted the above message, then found the solution almost immediately after:

    http://www.Vistax64.com/tutorials/233243-default-file-type-associations-restore.html

    I have selected the "LNK" link and run the registry script it contains, and returned all the icons.  It is only the shortcuts that have been replaced.

    (This time I saved the first restore point!)  Problem solved, in an orderly manner.  TX to all who examined him.

  • Impact security to disable the content switch SSL closure alert?

    HI: I have a few problems troubleshooting of applications at the level of the SSL layer. Based on a few known bugs of IE with Cisco solutions for the content switch with SSL accelerator, we intend to disable the

    where to pass the content of the feature sends not SSL closure alert.

    Wondering if anyone out there have ideas if this (disable SSL closure alert to the server) will have an impact or if there are security holes?

    Thank you

    Ravi

    For the CSM = "close-Protocol No" tells the SSL module not

    for sending the SSL close notify alert all by closing the connection.

    One of the ramifications of this could be that IE browser client might

    not to negotiate the resumption of the SSL session for later ssl

    connection...

    This does not impair the functionality, could result in gradient

    performance from the SSL module should establish more new sessions

    instead of the resumed session.

  • Security procedures/packages. Hide source code?

    Hello.

    I was wondering if it is possible to hide the source code of a procedure for a user or to avoid him to recreate it, but leave it to run it.

    Im doing a procedure of Lac sand which modify and run an external task. It works fine, but I see a lot of security holes. If any DB user who can execute this procedure can change too, they could run any command shell by modifying the attributes of external work. I could use the credentials (11.2.0.2) and somehow limit the use of the system to specific orders, but I want to fix the security hole by limiting the user DB limiting rather the user of the system.

    It is the external work
    BEGIN
    DBMS_SCHEDULER.CREATE_JOB(
    job_name => 'test',
    job_type => 'EXECUTABLE',
    job_action => '/bin/sh',
    number_of_arguments => 2
    );
    
    DBMS_SCHEDULER.SET_JOB_ARGUMENT_VALUE (
    job_name => 'test',
    argument_position => 1,
    argument_value => '-c'
    );
    
    DBMS_SCHEDULER.SET_JOB_ARGUMENT_VALUE (
    job_name => 'test',
    argument_position => 2,
    argument_value => '/bin/date>>/tmp/date.log'
    );
    END;
    / 
    And then the procedure.
    CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE TEST_DATE_FILE ( new_file IN varchar2 )
    IS BEGIN
    DBMS_SCHEDULER.SET_JOB_ARGUMENT_VALUE (
    job_name => 'test',
    argument_position => 2,
    argument_value => '/bin/date>>/tmp/' || new_file
    );
    
    DBMS_SCHEDULER.RUN_JOB(
                                    job_name =>             'test',
                                    use_current_session =>  TRUE
                                    );
    END;
    /
    --
    SQL > conn scott/tiger
    Conectado.
    SQL > exec TEST_DATE_FILE('newfile.log');

    Procedure-PL/SQL terminado correctamente.

    SQL > CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE SYS. TEST_DATE_FILE (new_file IN varchar2)
    2. IS BEGIN
    3 DBMS_SCHEDULER. () SET_JOB_ARGUMENT_VALUE
    job_name 4 = > 'test ',.
    5 argument_position = > 2,
    argument_value 6 = > "rm - rf/bin / / tmp / *'"
    (7);
    8
    9 DBMS_SCHEDULER. () RUN_JOB
    job_name 10 = > 'test ',.
    11 use_current_session = > TRUE
    (12);
    13 END;
    14.

    Created procedure.

    SQL > exec TEST_DATE_FILE (' ');

    Procedure-PL/SQL terminado correctamente.

    --

    It is possible to hide the source code of the procedure that edits and run the external procedure?
    There is no work around or any idea how I can avoid this?

    Concerning

    Published by: elvegaa_esp on 17-may-2012 02:41

    Published by: elvegaa_esp on 17-may-2012 02:43

    [email protected] > host wrap iname = test.sql oname = test_wrap.sql

    PL/SQL Wrapper: Release 8.1.7.2.0 - Production on Mon Jan 07 12:44:21 2002
    Copyright (c) 1993 Oracle Corporation, 2000. All rights reserved.
    Test.sql to test_wrap.sql treatment

    [email protected] > @test_wrap.sql
    [email protected] > create or replace procedure wrapped p
    2 0
    3 abcd
    4 abcd
    5-abcd
    6 abcd
    7 abcd
    8 abcd
    9 abcd
    10 abcd
    11-abcd
    12 abcd
    13 abcd
    14 abcd
    ABCD 15
    ABCD 16
    17 abcd
    18 3
    19 7
    20 8106000
    21 1
    22 4
    23 0
    24 4
    25 2: e:
    26 1 P:
    27 1DBMS_OUTPUT:
    28 1PUT_LINE:
    29 1Hello world:
    30 0
    31
    ...
    86.

    Created procedure.

    and now you do not have

    [email protected] > select text from user_source where name = 'P ';

    TEXT
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    -------------------------------
    procedure wrapped p
    0
    ABCD
    ABCD
    ABCD
    ABCD
    ABCD
    ABCD
    ABCD
    ABCD
    ABCD
    ABCD
    ABCD
    ABCD
    ABCD
    ABCD
    ABCD
    3
    7
    8106000
    1
    4
    0
    4
    2: e:
    1 P:
    1DBMS_OUTPUT:
    1PUT_LINE:
    1Hello world:
    0
    ...

    [email protected] >

    Published by: human Chen on May 29, 2012 11:26

  • Remove Apple ID

    Inadvertently, I created two Apple ID a few years and the need to remove one of them.   I recently received a notice that it has connected in a web browser at the time I wasn't near a computer, so I'll try to close my security holes.

    Thank you.

    Click here and ask Apple to remove it.

    (144917)

  • Password in clear text in the settings personal WiFi hotspot?

    is ios10.0.1 - necessary to show wifi password in clear text? Why? Now I have to worry about pwd wifi being exposed to anyone who uses my phone. I can give them the phone to use for other purposes, but not at the risk of password exposure. This is a security hole.

    It's just for the personal hotspot. It is not reveal your password to other wifi wifi that connect. The personal hotspot, it must show for you to know what password to use to connect to it with other devices.

Maybe you are looking for