11.1.2.2 planning architecture

Similar Questions

• Planning architecture

  Hi John,.
  
  I work on planning and got a basic doubt. If I divide architecture as database layer, the application layer and the client layer. I have db and essbase as database layer.
  
  I saw smart, workspace and web planning as my client layer or user. I am now confused with the application layer. Is this server web planning?
  
  your idea pls
  
  Khan

  Hi Khan,

  1. web breaks is a program whose goal is to deliver content using the HTTP protocol on intenet or WWW.

  2. coming from server of web application, its quite different. There the application logic in it, which is like scripts, objects, etc.

  3. the web server acts as the outside world application interface and it receives input from web clients (here, Forms data) via HTTP and deliver the output or result generated by the application in the form of HTML pages

  4 hope you explained

  Sandeep Reddy, Enti
  HCC
  http://hyperionconsultancy.com/

• Planning for the issue metadata.

  Hello
  
  I could hear a strange Essbase planning architecture information. Ideally, all changes in the Planning would reflect in Essbase post Refresh. Is there one or the other way around? say that any change in Essbase will update in the Planning? Maybe is not in the latest versions, all the versions old or older in planning?
  In addition, planning is never directly on Essbase (older versions), I mean with a relational repository?
  
  Please let me know.

  Hello

  Is there one or the other way around? say that any change in Essbase will update in the Planning?

  N °

  Maybe is not in the latest versions, all the versions old or older in planning?

  Some Versions will be repeated.

  a planning never reside directly on Essbase (older versions), I want to say on a relational repository?

  N °

  Planning emphasizes the management of metadata (contour, members, etc.). and pushing these changes to Essbase. Planning has always been a relational repository. The relational repository has pretty much everything on your application planning in there except the actual data. Never try to directly edit the essbase cube in a planning application. If you do something like Plum and the registry, you may cause the entire application to stop working.

  Kind regards
  Robb Salzmann

• pool-computers in office-users

  Hello

  I have a pool with 3 desktops and of multiple users. each user has received 1 desktop computer.

  is able to assign only 3 desktops to 40 users?  How can I do?

  or is mandatory 1 computer desktop for the user?

  Tjansk a lot

  I found the below on page 37 of the planning architecture guide.  It would seem that it is recommended to use a dedicated assignment.

  http://www.VMware.com/PDF/view45_architecture_planning.PDF

  Use dedicated assignment because the local mode users must connect to the same desktop computer every time.

  If you have found this device or any other useful post please consider the use of buttons useful/correct to award points

  Twitter: http://twitter.com/mittim12

• ADF Faces & BC: best practices for project implementation

  Season greetings my fellow JDevelopers!
  
  Our group of software works with ADF for about 5 years and over the years, we have accumulated a good amount of knowledge in collaboration with JDeveloper and ADF. A large part of our current structure of demand was resurrected in the early days of JDeveloper 10 where there are more codes samples floating around, then there was the 'best practices' documentation. I understand that this is a subjective question, and varies from one site to another, but in my view, there is a set of common practices, our group began to identify as essential to the rationalization of a development process (reusable decorated with user interface components, modular common biz logic, the development with svn, continuous integration/build team, etc...). One of our development objectives is to minimize the dependence between each engineer as everyone is responsible for the client and middle tier application without losing the consistency of coding. After speaking with a couple of the ACE to the last openworld, I understand a large part of our planned architectural requirements are filled with JDeveloper 11 (with the introduction of models, declarative elements, bordered of workflow, etc...) but lack of time on the results expected to come, we are still almost a year away before moving to this new version. Here's some of our group/application.
  
  JDeveloper version: 10.1.3.4
  Number of developers: 7
  Responsibilities of the developer: build both faces & collection bc
  
  We currently have two applications in our production environments.
  1.A flavor of the dynamic module from Steve Muench jdbc connection credentials
  2 core application ADF Faces & BC
  
  In our Core ADF Faces application, we get the following structure:
  
  OurApplication
  -OurApplicationLib (common framework files)
  -OurApplicationModel (project BC)
  src/org/ourapp/module1
  -src/org/ourapp/module 2
  …
  -OurApplicationView (project faces)
  OurApp/public_html/module1
  OurApp/public_html/module2
  …
  SRC/org/ourapp/support/module1
  SRC/org/ourapp/support/module 2
  …
  SRC/org/ourapp/pageDefs /.
  
  
  Total number of application Modules: 15 (including a RootApplicationModule that references the specific AMs module)
  Display of number objects total: 171
  Total number of entities: 58
  Total number of files BC: 1734
  Total number of JSP pages: 246
  Total number of pageDefs: 236
  Total number of cases of navigation in faces - config.xml: 127
  Total number of application files: 4183
  Application size total: 180megs
  
  Are there other ways to divide this application? IE: module specific projects with distinct faces-config files/databindings? If so, how can these files be "hooked" together? A couple of aces has recommended that we must separate all files of the entity in its own project that make sense. In addition, we look at maven builds that must remove the pesky model.jpr files that gets constantly "touched". I would love to hear how other groups organize their application and anything else, they would like to share as a best practice ADF.
  
  See you soon,.
  Wes

  After discussions in the summer/fall by members of the ADF methodology group, I have published a wiki page ADF Coding Standards that people may find useful:
  [http://wiki.oracle.com/page/ADF+Coding+Standards]

  It aims to ADF 11g and is intended to be a living document - if you have any comments or suggestions please post them to the ADF methodology ([http://groups.google.com/group/adf-methodology?hl=en]) google group.

• Installation of Hyperion Planning in a distributed Architecture

  Hi all
  
  I'm new in the world of Hyperion...
  
  I try to install Hyperion Palnning 11.1.1.1.0 in a distributed environment... and in the face of difficulty deciding where each component has to go...
  
  Here is a description of the architecture in which I want to get Hyperion operational Planning:
  
  A Windows Server box - EPMA must be installed on windows that I read in the available installation guides...
  Two boxes of AIX - decided to put and Essbase on one database and planning on the other.
  
  I'm using the Oracle 11 g as the daatbase. And Oracle application server for the deployment.
  
  According to my understanding... I need the following components must be installed for planning...
  
  Shared services
  Essbase - client, server, administrative services, service providers (for Smart office)
  Planning
  EPMA
  Workspace
  
  Can someone plaese advice on how I should go about the installation of the components?
  
  Advice would be appreciated.
  
  Thanks in advance!

  Hello

  Essbase does not have an application server, EAS made but which could be placed on the same server as the planning, it's your choice.

  See you soon

  John
  http://John-Goodwin.blogspot.com/

• Us plan to mobile CPU architecture and need ideas on my approach.

  We currently have 1 cluster of production with 4 ESX host 4.0 running on AMD cpu running. So we do not appreciate with the material (presumed reliability) are considering the switch to Intel.

  I want to just make sure I'm right in this approach. Create another cluster in vCenter new Intel based servers. Each virtual machine power off and migrate to the new cluster. Turn on the prompt.

  Guests should not have any problem change to the correct Intel chipset?

  Thank you

  Tim

  That sounds right. If you have kept the same architecture you might get away with migration, just need to restart the VM when in the new cluster for the VM sees the new CPUID and gets the instructions available in the new processor, but it is not possible between AMD and Intel, at least not yet. I'm sure it will soon be possible.

  Given that the virtual machines 'hardware' is especially virtualized, your VM is fine for most because the material does not actually change knowledge of the virtual machine. Now, here's capture, the CPU is not truly virtualized, it is essentially transmitted directly to the guest, essentially a hole punched in the layer of virtualization for virtual machine actually accesses the physical CPU. Any modern Windows installation should see the new processor during startup and update itself, which I'm sure that will result in a restart required. Linux in the past had problems with passage of AMD and Intel because the kernel compiled in some specificities of AMD, which was years ago it is quite possible it is more a problem, of course, if you don't have any Linux VM then this isn't a problem for you in any case. But if you don't you pouvez must recompile a new kernel. The only other way you have questions it's if you run software that was compiled specially to take advantage of the exclusive features of AMD. Say you had the source code of the software really really really old which was written poorly and you compile on one of these virtual machines with an AMD processor and software compiled with only the set of features of AMD. But I highly doubt this scenario...

  In conclusion, you should be fine. But first, try creating a clone test and make migration with first. Or test with a VM junk or non-critical virtual machine, or install a new temporary virtual machine and test it with this one.

  -Ed

• Get rid of a graphic architecture on a work plan

  Hello

  Hope you are well.

  Unfortunately, I can't attach a photo of it because when I try to use a snippet inside the Illustrator and take a snapshot of the page this graph disappears.

  It's something that I'll be gone before and I'm sure that can be cleared with a quick shortcut. It's kind of a two dimension blue and orange form. A bit like a building with views.

  Does anyone know how to get rid of this?

  Thank you!

  Cmd (Ctrl) - shift - I seem to be the rocker for tuning on and off the grid. (View > Perspective grid > show/hide grid)

• Update file is invalid for this architecture?

  Earlier this year, I bought a ReadyNAS NV + (silver body, 4 bays with 2 TB, plan 5.0).
  It is currently running RAIDiator version 4.1.9 build 1.00a043 (Orange and blue FrontView web interface).

  Today, I bought the following.

  Python2.7_2.7.3 - rnsparc - 0.5.1
  SABnzbd_0.6.15 - rnsparc - 0.7.0
  SickBeard_0.485.1 - rnsparc - 0.8.1

  Went to system/update / local. Click on "Choose file". Module ' Python2.7_2.7.3 - rnsparc - 0.5.1 "selected (bin file). Clicked on "download and check the image. Click on 'OK '. Received this error message, "update file is invalid for this architecture".

  What is going on, the processor has been changed? Have I misunderstood the installation process?

  Below are some information that might be relevant.

  -J' did what I can to check the processor, but it seems to be nothing in FrontView or RAIDar that verifies this.
  -I don't have SSH installed because I read somewhere that it invalidates the warranty.
  -J' got this error even some time back, when I tried to manually update RAIDiator.
  -J' just tried a few other modules SPARC and I still get this message.
  -I have no third party add-ons installed.
  -J' have the 'ReadyDLNA"streaming service and"TimeMachine support"lit.
  -I have not tried one of the other architecture because I don't want to lose more money and I don't know that it is SPARC.

  Thanks in advance for any help.

  A tech at ReadyNASXtras (MDGM) solved this problem for me. It turns out that at somepoint, I tried to install PLEX that is not available for SPARC. He failed but was not removed. There was no evidence (apart from this error) FrontView of the residue. Installation failed has confused the script of update/s. The clean tech upward and everything works fine now.

  Problem solved. Thanks MDGM.

  P.S. I just learned by MDGM that a reinstallation of the RAIDiator firmware would have also fixed this.

  Cheers. EkDor

• Programmatically change the number of producers in an architecture of producer/consumer

  Hi all

  I've got 3 momo SoMat I am streaming of data to 10 Hz. I plan on 3 producer loops and loop a consumer to treat.

  I am pretty sure when I show my customer that they want to increase the number of devices. This scuppers then the producer/consumer model unless I change by programming the number of producers and the rest of the architecture associated.

  Is there a way to do this or a better architecture?

  Phil

  As long as there is an ID any in your command of the queue, I do not see why your consumer cannot handle the producers as much as you need.  I would turn the producer code in a Subvi.  Make sure reentrant Subvi.  Then, you can call dynamically that VI as many times as you need, one for each instrument.

• Architecture for chemical plant DCS + SIS boards

  Hello

  I'm designing a control system for a small pilot plant.

  I have it set on the use of State diagrams to encode the actuator low level i/o (input sensor readings and instructions, output control signals). However, I am puzzled about how to architect the system as a whole in LabVIEW. I need to support sequences of quite complex locking, which allows the security system to do its thing without blocking unrelated parts of the plant.

  for example if high-high fires, open the valve B close valve c. condition D wait to fill out, then close the B valve and open valve C. In the meantime, valve X is planned to open for 5 seconds every 10 minutes under normal operations - it should continue its pattern, without taking into account the high-high alarm A. High-high alarm is valve however, X must be immediately opened until Z condition is met.

  Anyone with experience have any advice or resources to share?

  Thanks in advance!

  Consider placing the parts of the code that deal with non related (more correctly: independent) parts of your plant in parallel loops. These loops can run without interference from each other. Transmit messages between the loops as needed through queues.

  Watch the producer/consumer architecture and examples of Message Queuing as ideas to help you get started.  Probably none of these is entirely adapted to your needs in the basic shapes, but the concepts are useful.  The State machines for different parts of the plant can be implemented within these forms.

  A lot of planning before writing code is paid in terms of necessity reduced to go back and start over.

  Lynn

• What architecture for loop to hour of time timed with responsiveness front

  I cannot consider this application planning.  I was originally using an Event Driven Architecture with a State Machine in queue to analyse Panel UI changes and react accordingly.  (Something like the solution found here).

  Datalogging should be done in its own loop with the data passed by a queue.

  If you want, you can have multiple queues and several loops of consumer.

• Look at my new Foglight architecture, comments and reviews are welcome

  It's just an idea of my new Foglight presentation. I like gurus in our community to hammer on this subject, do not hesitate to comment on or remind me of some sin that this potential problem, architecture.

  The basic ideas for the layout are as

  1. divide the traffic by content type or categories.

  A Foglight lock only the end user sessions and to isolate the Foglight from any other content such as soap service visits. According to my calculations, processing capacity of the server R720 is good enough for the end-user session monitor and still have room for the increasing traffic and spikes in time. I wouldn't worry package flood the network my box of suffocation, and users have a stable environment.

  2. get independent foglight is better one back centralised.

  There are design using a server portal as Central and with several probes to load the data. I highly doubt on such a structure. I had already found data divergence/DELAY between the probe and the Portal Server. I also find that the collector of treatment capacity is about 50% to 30% lower than the probe. A fall of packets occurs if pass all traffic of Fxm in FxV. that is why I would use rather better autonomous system rather than shared system.  Just wonder if anyone has a similar experience, success or failure, centralized or distributed design/structure.

  3. use dashboard FMS to meet multiple foglight stabd-only system data

  Users need to connect several times looking for their stuff, but its disadvantage. I intend to use the dashboard FMS as a major platform to intergate mutiple FxM and FxV. Not sure if FMS have this ability to import all metrics of EUMS. I also like to listen to the commentary on this design

  Concerning

  Juwei

  

  Hi Juwei,

  Is this an update with the current equipment with an existing implementation, or is it a plan for a new implementation?

  Kind regards

  Darren

• Planning and design

  Hello

  I'm a Uni student and an assignment is to create a large network of WLAN.

  Please could someone point me in the right direction I need to know how to design and plan the WIFI network before you start searching for material. I tried all kinds of searches on the Internet but can't find something suitable.

  Please can someone help?

  Thanks in advance.

  Uzma

  Hi Sylvie,.

  At this time, it is likely that during the creation of a large network of WLAN you will use a "Light" architecture Here's something good "getting started" Cisco docs (and a video link) that could help with your first No. Don't forget to pay special attention to your (best to hire a professional firm for this function) Site Survey;

  Wireless LAN design guide

  http://www.Cisco.com/Web/about/ciscoitatwork/design_guides/DG-WLAN.html

  Site survey wireless FAQ

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_q_and_a_item09186a00805e9a96.shtml

  Understand the Lightweight Access Point Protocol (LWAPP)

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/NetSol/ns340/ns394/ns348/ns337/networking_solutions_white_paper0900aecd802c18ee.shtml

  Deploying Cisco of the X 440 series wireless LAN controllers

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6366/prod_technical_reference09186a00806cfa96.html

  Cisco Wireless LAN Controller Configuration Guide, version 4.0

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6366/products_configuration_guide_book09186a00806b0077.html

  Video WLC

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6366/index.html

  Lightweight Access Point FAQ

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6306/products_qanda_item09186a00806a4da3.shtml

  Registration of the light AP (LAP) to a controller (WLC) wireless LAN

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_tech_note09186a00806c9e51.shtml

  Wireless - compare products and Solutions

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/HW/wireless/products_category_buyers_guide.html

  I hope this helps! And good luck.

  Rob

• architecture of Windows

  I want to see the architecture of Windows. How does it work?

  Hi ShamsSultan,

  What are you exactly know?

  We can refer to the article and check if it helps.

  Windows 7: planning and Architecture

  Hope the helps of information. Let us know if you need help with Windows related issues. We will be happy to help you.