2 switch & 2 VLANs

Similar Questions

• VMware Distributed Switch with VLAN

  Hi again,

  A lot of work with VLAN now.

  But just a quick Questions. Is there a documentation or HowTo Guides how to set up vSphare VMware Distributed Switch with several VLANS on a Switch GS724Tv4?

  

  But soon, I try to add a host or network, it is empty.

  This is probably an easy problem of VMware, but I try here first to see if someone has document guide HowTo so I can start with.

  Thank you

  Christian

  Never mind about this,

  I found the problem on my own, but perhaps a documentation would be great to have. But it's a good start to have the right license of VMware, before you start.

  * I was just out of luck when I thought *.

  / Christian

• SD205 (switch) and VLAN

  In addition to all my switches Cisco Catalyst (successful), I have a bunch of Linksys SD205 unmanaged switches on my local network.

  I want to configure my network for VLANs, which means I have all my managed Cisco switches will change to a "Routing" configuration   This configuration works well with Cisco Catalyst switches

  Question: the SD205 can operate in this environment?  I know I can't put one of the ports on the SD205 to be 'delivery', but I would like to connect the SD205 to a port of Cisco, which is "effective", so that the devices on the SD205 can communicate to the rest of the world.

  So far, I have not crowned success, then - maybe - they won't work in a shared resource environment.  Someone at - it a definitive answer?  If they simply can't do it, I will stop wasting my time!

  Thank you

  # A unmanaged switch is not compatible 802. 1 q. It will pass any frame ethernet that was 802. 1 q tagged. The only executives who pass through a switch are unmarked, frames that is the VLAN port on the catalyst native.

  If you want to use unmanaged switches, you have to connect to a port configured in mode access, Member of a single VLAN. For example, you can configure a port on the catalyst for access VLAN 10 mode and connect a switch to that port. All devices connected to the switch unmanaged will be VLAN 10. This as you can do.

  But several VLANS: alert the unmanaged switches is impossible because all frames ethernet on the switch must not be tagged.

• PowerConnect M6220 problem without tag switch of VLAN

  Good afternoon.
  I do not have much knowledge of networks and need help.
  M6220 have this connected to a HP ProCurve switch switch connected by a trunk.
  My problem is that I can not pass the 10 untagged procurve VLAN to the M6220 switch, can you help me?
  M6220 has firmware version 1.
  Thank you

  On a network connection VLAN native is the VLAN used to send and receive packets not marked. Here is an example of the configuration.

  Console (config-if-article gi1/0/1) #interface item in gi1/0/24
  trunk mode console (config-if-article gi1/0/24) #switchport
  Console (config-if-article gi1/0/24) #switchport trunk vlan 10 native
  trunk allowed vlan #switchport console (config-if-article gi1/0/24) add 10,11,12,13

  If trunk mode does not work, you can also try to use the general mode.

  Console (config-if-article gi1/0/1) #interface item in gi1/0/24
  mode console (config-if-article gi1/0/24) general #switchport
  Console (config-if-article gi1/0/24) #switchport general pvid 10
  Console (config-if-article gi1/0/24) #switchport general allowed vlan add 10 untagged
  Console (config-if-article gi1/0/24) #switchport general allowed vlan add 11,12,13 tag

  Hope this helps

• Make two cheating SG200 four switches with vlan

  Hello

  I have two switches SG200 I want to divide it into 2 VLANS totally independent.

  My guess is that I could create a VLAN #2 and then assign 1-24 of VLAN (default) #1 and ports 25-48 of VLAN #2.

  Do the same with the second switch.

  And finally connect the cable from the port 1 switch 1 to port 1 of the 2 switch and

  another cable to port 25 on switch 1 to port 25 on switch 2.

  For some reason, devices can bee 'ping' on the same ports vlan switch 1 but cannot reach the devices on the switch 2.

  Is there a way to do this with SG200 switches?

  Thank you

  It is a valid topology.

  Any individual connection to the router should be UNTAG vlan 1 and vlan 2 UNTAG.

  Any connection host for the vlan 1 should be vlan 1 UNTAG, any connection host in vlan 2 should be vlan 2 UNTAG. Marking only that we care is between the switches, 1u, 2 t trunk. Everything else is respectively not marked.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Mini of the UCS + 4 switches, no VLAN

  Hi all

  I have a mini UCS with 6324 modules e/s with B200 m3 x 5 blades, each ESXi 6.0 running.

  I want to uplink the UCS mini with four cables to four switches separated for traffic, and I wish that each host ESXi b200 see four separate vmincs, one on each network. The switches have no VLAN, but running DHCP. I want to get DHCP from each card.

  How can I go on the correspondences between the vNIC?  Groups of LAN Pin?

  Hi Alex,

  That is right. You can also implement Layer 2 disjoint explained in the guide below for more secure access.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/data-center-virtualiza...

  I hope this helps.

  Qiese Sa'di

• Make a little a bood by setting the switch 1 VLAN other than ALL - lost to ESXi management

  Hi all

  As the title says, I mucked this up a little bit. I have two virtual switches configured, one with all my virtual machines on three cards attached network, and the other with the management and interface card NETWORK attached.

  I thought that I have would combine the lot in a single switch and have the cards connected to the simple switch. Everything is VLAN'ed switch0 was set up at the trunk all the VLANS, as was the segment of management - although this should be in one VLAN specific. I've updated the Switch0 simply use the VLAN segment management and connectivity quickly lost the device to ESXi. All virtual machines on their VLAN specific are OK on the second switch.

  How can I return a network access ESXi?

  Console access is available, but I seem to have lost Out Light control will have to physically go to the machine.

  What a prick!

  Chris

  Couple of questions to understand the actions performed by you:

  I've updated the Switch0 simply use the VLAN management segment, and quickly lost connectivity to the device ESXi--> do you mean WHAT VLAN ID changed to 18 0 (none)?

  

  The virtual switch was set to pass all THE VLAN the Port VMkernal (Management Network Group) has been updated with "All THE VLAN", I went it to the VLAN (18)-->, you gave VLAN ID as 18 and your single NIC - VMNIC 0 is interconnection to VLAN 18?

  In simple words - you physical NIC 0 visibility to VLAN 18 or not (you will have to ask Admin network) - double else check your wiring asks that you made at the time of Installation

  For this kind of connectivity issues - you need problems like RSA/ILO/DRAC remote console based on the style of the material.

• Switch tag vlan

  Hello

  I'm install esx 5.1.

  I have 3 vlan (prod, vmotion, vmkernel). I am glad that when I put vlan dcui (yellow form) correct, that I can not ping host esx. If Iremove vlan tag I can ping esx host.

  I suspect that someone does not work on the switch (not run by me).

  How can I help the team network? What game on the switch port network team must be defined?

  Thank you

  Jonh

  asanet wrote:

  Hello

  I'm install esx 5.1.

  I have 3 vlan (prod, vmotion, vmkernel). I am glad that when I put vlan dcui (yellow form) correct, that I can not ping host esx. If Iremove vlan tag I can ping esx host.

  I suspect that someone does not work on the switch (not run by me).

  How can I help the team network? What game on the switch port network team must be defined?

  Thank you

  Jonh

  Your network team should create a 'trunk' for physical network ports used by ESXi. On the trunk, they should allow these 3 VLAN mentioned above. Now, I guess they did but you "VMkernel" VLANS is equal to your regular administration VLAN, which is also be the VLAN native.

  So I think that there is nothing 'wrong' with your configuration, it's just an implementation detail... If the "management VLANS" also happens be the VLAN native side effect is that you do not need to specify a VLAN ID on the portgroup.

  More details can be found here: VMware KB: example configuration of the virtual switch VLAN tagging (VST Mode)

• Networking Concepts advanced on Switch virtual: Vlan-association

  I have a network configuration problem, and I need to implement it on my virtual switch.

  I have Vlan Setup with a primary and the association vlan. The goal of this configuration is to isolate members vlan and to prohibit any communication between members of the same Vlan.

  The configuration is the following:

  VLAN 201

  name NewHostnig

  private - vlan primary school

  private - vlan association 202

  !

  VLAN 202

  name NewHostingIsolated

  !

  interface FastEthernet2/13

  FW description

  switchport access vlan 201

  switchport private - vlan mapping 201 202

  switchport mode private - vlan promiscuity

  events-the link status logging

  interface FastEthernet2/14

  Description Client_www

  Description access vlan 201

  organizing switchport private vlan Association 201 202

  switchport private - vlan mapping 201 202

  switchport mode private - vlan host

  events-the link status logging

  Can I set this up on my virtual switch?

  Thanks for your help

  Cisco PVLANS (Private VLANS) are not supported at the moment on ESX 3.5 vswitchs. Would be a nice feature, but we will have to wait and see

• ISE server receives requests for authentication of the bridge VLAN, not the IP Address of the switch management

  Hello

  A 3850 catalyst switch has VLAN 20 (10.18.4.32/29) defined on it, which has a 10.18.4.38 gateway:

  D01-01-BWY #show ip short int vlan 20
  Interface IP-Address OK? Method State Protocol
  Vlan20 10.18.4.38 YES manual up up

  A server of ISE (SNS3415) is connected to a port configured on VLAN 20, with IP address of 10.18.4.33.

  01-BWY-D01 has to a management interface of 10.18.4.17.

  I created this switch as a device network in ISE and activated the RADIUS config and then configured the switch with the following commands:

  RADIUS attribute 6 sur-pour-login-auth server
  RADIUS attribute 6 support-multiple server
  Server RADIUS attribute 8 include-in-access-req
  RADIUS attribute 25-application access server include
  dead-criteria 5 tent 3 times RADIUS server
  RADIUS-server host 10.18.4.33 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 borders 7 1521030916792F077C236436125657
  RADIUS-server host 10.18.4.35 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 borders 7 02350C5E19550B02185E580D044653

  radius of the IP source-interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1

  The problem:

  When I test the functionality of RADIUS using the following command, it fails. HOWEVER, the customer (switch) IP listed in the error log in the front door of the VLAN 20 (!):

  test the aaa group RADIUS server 10.18.4.33 auth-port 1812 Capita123 user radius acct-port 1813! new-code

  10.18.4.38 is the gateway IP address of the VLAN that hosts the servers of the ISE, I don't understand why its listed in error as IP device logs!

  ource Timestamp 2016-06-22 16:38:02.826 Receipt of timestamp 2016-06-22 16:38:02.841 Policy Server GLS-ISE-01 Event 5413, accounting RADIUS-Request dropped Reason for failure 11007 could locate no device network or Client AAA Resolution Check if the device network or AAA client is configured in: Administration > network resources > network devices First cause Could not find the network device or the AAA Client while accessing NAS by IP during authentication. Type of service Box NAS IPv4 address 10.18.4.38

  Other attributes ConfigVersionId 118 Port of the device 1646 DestinationPort 1813 Protocol RADIUS ACCT-status-Type Update-intermediate ACCT-Delay-Time 15 ACCT-Session-Id 00000000 ACCT-Authentic RADIUS AcsSessionID GLS-ISE-01/255868885/32 IP address of the device 10.18.4.38

  If I reconfigure the switch to the ISE - peripheral network and give it the IP address of 10.18.4.38 (the ip of the gateway), my radius authentication tests suddenly becomes successful.

  can someone clarify the situation what is happening here?

  I need to be able to define multiple switches by their unique IP addresses.

  Thanks for your time

  m

  Hello

  The only time I saw that it was due to use a deprecated command: radius server host.  There was a bug on the IOS XR platform as well.

  Could you please reconfigure your order of RADIUS by using the new command: radius server? And test again?

  The doc of Cisco for the new order:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/iOS-NX-OS-software/iDEN...

  Thank you

  PS: Please do not forget to rate and score as good response if this solves your problem

• VLANS with Cisco ASA 5505 and non-Cisco switch

  I have an ASA5505 and a switch Netgear GSM7224 L2 that I try to use together.  I can't grasp how VLANs (or at least how they should be put in place).  When configuring my VLAN on the ASA5505 it seems simple enough, but then on my switch, I thought I'd create just the same VLAN numbers that I used on the SAA and then add the ports that I wanted to use for each VLAN.

  Currently on my ASA, I have the following VLAN configured...

  outside - vlan11 - Port 0/0

  inside - vlan1 - Port 0/1

  dmz_ftp - vlan21 - Port 0/2

  Port of Corp - vlan31 - 0/3

  I need to do the same thing on my switch as well...  On my way, I'm a little confused as to how I need to configure the VLAN.  Below is the screenshot of web GUI...

  

  Note: Normally you can now change the VLAN ID (red), but in this case the default vlan (vlan id 1) may not be changed or deleted, you can does not change its settings.

  Tagged (green), Untagged (purple) and Autodetect (yellow) you must select at least 1.  I'm not sure how to in one place to tell my inner vlan (vlan1).

  I want VLAN1 ports 1-8 on my Netgear switch used alone to talk to interface/0/1 on the ASA5505 port.  I don't want to NOT port 9-24 able to talk to ports 1-8 on the Netgear switch ports OR 0/0, 0/2 - 0 / 7 on the Cisco ASA 5505.

  So, how can I configure my inner Vlan1 on ports 1-8 on the switch?  Do mark, UNTAG, autodetect them?  What about tours?  I've been a bit the impression that I would set up my VLAN on both devices, then trunk port 1 and dedicate this port on both devices to nothing other than the sheath and the security of vlan would then take the packages where they need to go.  Is this the wrong logic?

  Hi Arvo,

  If the port of the ASA is just part of a single VLAN (i.e. e0/0 single door 11 VLAN), this is called an access port. If the port of the ASA had to carry several VLANs, it would constitute a Trunk port.

  To access ports (VLAN unique), you must set the switch corresponding to be unidentified for port this VLAN individual. If you decide to configure a trunk port, then the port of the switch must be set for labelling for each of VLAN who win the trunk.

  For example, ASA I have:

  interface Ethernet0/1
  switchport access vlan 20
  !
  interface Vlan20
  nameif inside
  security-level 100
  ip address 192.168.100.254 255.255.255.0
  

  With the above configuration, the configuration of the switch would look like this (assuming the e0/1 port of the SAA is connected to 0/1 on the switch):

  VLAN 20 - 0/1 = untagged

  If instead you use a trunk port, the config would look like this:

  interface Ethernet0/0
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20
  switchport mode trunk
  !
  interface Vlan10
  nameif outside
  security-level 0
  ip address dhcp setroute
  !
  interface Vlan20
  nameif inside
  security-level 100
  ip address 192.168.100.254 255.255.255.0
  

  Assuming that the ASA e0/0 port is connected to 0/1 on the switch):

  VLAN 10 - 0/1 = tagged
  VLAN 20 - 0/1 = tagged
  

  Hope that helps.

  -Mike

• SF302 - 08 p Switch VLAN problem

  Hello

  I have a problem to set up a SF 302 - 08 p switch for VLAN. Here's my setup. I have two switches that are configured almost the same. The first switch is a SF200 - 24 p with 12 ports on VLAN1 and VLAN2 12 ports. The port of G1 is the trunk entering with 1UP, 2 t and all port of G2 at 1UP, 2 t connection to the G1 port on the switch of SF302-8. The two VLAN works OK on the SF200-24 switch. The port on the SF200-24 is set on trunk 1UP, 2T, and G1 on the SF302-8 port is set on trunk 1UP, 2 t. The composition of port VLAN on the SF302-8 figure to the VLAN 1 port 1-4 is 1UP and VLAN 2 port 5-8 is set to 2UP. Ports 1 to 4 work OK but the 5-8 does not connect to the vlan 2. I downloaded the latest firmware for the SF302 but it did not make a difference. Any suggestions on what I'm missing?

  Dan, send me an email with a number I can reach you. I am available at 4 pm Eastern.

  Update to this topic, we discovered a problem of layer 1, the switch upstream was a misplaced thread, leading to the port is misconfigured.

  Post edited by: Thomas Watts

• Problem VLAN HP Mini 110-4101er

  Hello. We have a level 2 + switch with VLAN. This netbook is unable to obtain an IP address from the DHCP server. Parameters default network has been applied. The same thing with another HP laptop with the same NIC Realtek. But another Acer netbook works fine on the same switch port. We do not know why.
  
  Any help would be appreciated.

  The problem is resolved. Had to download the new drivers and the utility of diagnosis on the Realtek site. With the help of the utility put in place of VLAN ID 0. Everything works fine.

• Tree covering weight switch STG

  The STG must match on all related switches of VLAN work correctly using PVRST?

  It seems that whenever I noticed that they are not the same VLANs that are not the same do not work as it should.

  Hello

  The STG value is local to the switch, so you can have for example vlan 100 10 STG on a switch and vlan 100 20 STG on another switch. For consistency, you should use the same training mapping on all switches, but is not mandatory.

  What needs to be mapped on both switches is the VLAN assigned to a tagged link. So if you have VLAN 1,10,20,30 assigned on the port on a switch, that you must have the same VLAN assigned on the port the other switch, regardless of the assigned fabyen.

  Kind regards

  Dan

• Connect together two switches SRW 2024

  I did some research on this and I'm getting mixed results.  I have 5 Configuration of VLAN, not including the native VLAN 1.  Vlan1 has 1 as untaggged and together the trunk port.  Him is excluded.  VLAN 100 has unidentified port defined on trunk and labeled 1 and 9-12.  VLAN 200 has 1 trunk port and labeled and 2-6 unidentified.  VLAN500 port 1 tag/trunk and 14-20 untagged ports.  VLAN 600 has a port like the trunk but excluded and 21-24 as not tagged. VLAN 700 has port 1 as marked and 7 and 8 as not tagged.  I didn't buy an exact duplicate of the switch, another srw2024 and I want to connect to this existing switch.  Could someone tell me how I can do cela two ways: a way to broaden the VLAN to the second switch and the other with just to add the second switch and be able to create new VIRTUAL networks?  Any help is greatly appreciated!  Thank you =)

  You must create all the VLANS on switches where traffic of this VLAN may occur, either because there is a device connected to VLAN access mode, either because the traffic must travel through the switch. So, in your case, if you create a new VLAN on the second switch probably want to create the same VLAN on the first switch as well and add this new VLAN for the trunk between the first and the second switch port (i.e. make new Member tagged VLAN on the trunk of the ports at both ends).

  Of course, if the first SRW not connected to any other router VIRTUAL local area network or the Internet (e.g. you have a completely closed environment) and that you do not need a VLAN special on one of the switches, there is no need to add the VLAN on the switch or trunk ports. For example, if all the VLAN 100 devices are connected only to the second switch and none of these talks of devices outside, simply configure the VLAN 100 on the second switch because VLAN 100 traffic must never travel to SRW given that there is no device in VLAN 100.

  It is possible, however, generally for clearer network design and a greater flexibility in your facility, I recommend you to run all the VLAN through all switches so that later, when you want to add a device to VLAN 100 on the first switch you would only configure the port rather than begin to implement a new VIRTUAL LAN and configure trunk ports...